RESUMEN
Most multicellular organisms have a major body cavity that harbors immune cells. In primordial species such as purple sea urchins, these cells perform phagocytic functions but are also crucial in repairing injuries. In mammals, the peritoneal cavity contains large numbers of resident GATA6+ macrophages, which may function similarly. However, it is unclear how cavity macrophages suspended in the fluid phase (peritoneal fluid) identify and migrate toward injuries. In this study, we used intravital microscopy to show that cavity macrophages in fluid rapidly form thrombus-like structures in response to injury by means of primordial scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domains. Aggregates of cavity macrophages physically sealed injuries and promoted rapid repair of focal lesions. In iatrogenic surgical situations, these cavity macrophages formed extensive aggregates that promoted the growth of intra-abdominal scar tissue known as peritoneal adhesions.
Asunto(s)
Macrófagos Peritoneales/inmunología , Peritoneo/inmunología , Peritoneo/lesiones , Heridas y Lesiones/inmunología , Animales , Líquido Ascítico/inmunología , Plaquetas/inmunología , Agregación Celular/inmunología , Factor de Transcripción GATA6/análisis , Macrófagos Peritoneales/química , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Receptores Depuradores de Clase B/inmunología , Trombosis/inmunología , Adherencias Tisulares/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open abdomen (OA) may be required in patients with abdominal trauma, sepsis or compartment syndrome. Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) is a widely used approach for temporary abdominal closure to close the abdominal wall. However, this method is associated with a high incidence of re-operations in short term and late sequelae such as incisional hernia. The current study aims to compare the results of surgical strategies of OA with versus without permanent mesh augmentation. METHODS: Patients with OA treatment undergoing vacuum-assisted wound closure and an intraperitoneal onlay mesh (VAC-IPOM) implantation were compared to VAWCM with direct fascial closure which represents the current standard of care. Outcomes of patients from two tertiary referral centers that performed the different strategies for abdominal closure after OA treatment were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the study. Of these, 50 (36.0%) patients underwent VAC-IPOM and 89 (64.0%) patients VAWCM. VAC-IPOM was associated with reduced re-operations (adjusted incidence risk ratio 0.48 per 10-person days; CI 95% = 0.39-0.58, p < 0.001), reduced duration of stay on intensive care unit (ICU) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.53; CI 95% = 0.36-0.79, p = 0.002] and reduced hospital stay (aHR 0.61; CI 95% = 0.040-0.94; p = 0.024). In-hospital mortality [22.5 vs 18.0%, risk difference - 4.5; confidence interval (CI) 95% = - 18.2 to 9.3; p = 0.665] and the incidence of intestinal fistula (18.0 vs 22.0%, risk difference 4.0; CI 95% = -10.0 to 18.0; p = 0.656) did not differ between the two groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, hernia-free survival was significantly increased after VAC-IPOM (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing OA treatment, intraperitoneal mesh augmentation is associated with a significantly decreased number of re-operations, duration of hospital and ICU stay and incidence of incisional hernias when compared to VAWCM.
Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Anciano , Fasciotomía , Femenino , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
The individual results of the antibiotic susceptibility tests of 110 Enterobacteriaceae to 31 antibiotics (beta-lactamines, aminoglycosides, quinolones) have been compared on Mueller-Hinton and Isosensitest. No difference between the diameters of inhibition has been shown by the paired t test or signed rank test. The identification of the phenotypes of resistance (resistance patterns) were compared by principal component analysis and by help of an expert system. The patterns are identical in 99 cases and different in 11 cases. Six pattern were erroneous on Mueller-Hinton and 5 on Isosensitest. Globally both media gave a similar comparable answer in these conditions.