Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Parasit Vectors ; 14(1): 333, 2021 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34174940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aedes albopictus is a very invasive mosquito, which has recently colonized tropical and temperate regions worldwide. Of concern is its role in the spread of emerging or re-emerging mosquito-borne diseases. Ae. albopictus from south-western Europe and Brazil were studied to infer genetic and phenetic diversity at intra-individual, intra-population and inter-population levels, and to analyse its spread. METHODS: Genotyping was made by rDNA 5.8S-ITS-2 and mtDNA cox1 sequencing to assess haplotype and nucleotide diversity, genetic distances and phylogenetic networks. Male and female phenotyping included combined landmark-and outlined-based geometric morphometrics of wing size and shape. RESULTS: Specimens from seven populations from Spain, France and Brazil provided 12 cox1 and 162 5.8S-ITS-2 haplotypes, with great genetic variability difference between both markers (0.9% vs 31.2%). Five cox1 haplotypes were shared with other countries, mainly Italy, USA and China, but none was shared between Europe and Brazil. The 5.8S-ITS-2 showed 2-7 intra-individual (mean 4.7) and 16-34 intra-/inter-population haplotypes (24.7), including haplotypes shared between Spain, France and Brazil. A 4.3% of ITS-2 haplotypes were shared, mainly with Italy, USA and Thailand, evidencing worldwide spread and introductions from areas where recent outbreaks of Ae. albopictus-transmitted pathogens occurred. Wing size showed sex differences. Wing shape distinguished between Brazilian and European specimens. Both genetic and morphometric markers showed differences between insular Spain and continental Spain, France and Brazil. CONCLUSIONS: ITS-2 proves to be a useful marker to assess Ae. albopictus spread, providing pronouncedly more information than cox1, including intra-individual, intra-population and inter-population levels, furnishing a complete overview of the evolutionary exchanges followed by this mosquito. Wing morphometry proves to be a useful phenotyping marker, allowing to distinguish different populations at the level of both male and female specimens. Results indicate the need for periodic surveillance monitorings to verify that no Ae. albopictus with high virus transmission capacity is introduced into Europe.


Asunto(s)
Aedes/genética , ADN Intergénico/genética , ADN Mitocondrial/genética , ADN Ribosómico/genética , Aedes/anatomía & histología , Aedes/clasificación , Animales , Brasil , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Variación Genética , Haplotipos , Masculino , Mosquitos Vectores/clasificación , Mosquitos Vectores/genética , Fenotipo , Filogenia , Alas de Animales/anatomía & histología
2.
Parasite ; 24: 34, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28959938

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Forty-four strains isolated from a cohort of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) patients who did or did not respond to one course of treatment with meglumine antimoniate were investigated to explore genetic polymorphisms in parasite kinetoplast DNA minicircles. Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis strains isolated from responder (R) and non-responder (NR) patients who acquired infection in Rio de Janeiro or in other Brazilian states were studied using low-stringency single-specific primer polymerase chain reaction (LSSP-PCR) to identify genetic polymorphisms. RESULTS: Polymorphisms were observed in parasites recovered from patient lesions. No association was found between a specific genotype and R or NR patients. Phenetic analysis grouped the genotypes into three main clusters, with similarity indices varying from 0.72 to 1.00. Although no specific genotype association was detected, at least one group of L. (V.) braziliensis genotypes that circulates in Rio de Janeiro was discriminated in clusters I and III, showing phenotypes of good and poor responses to treatment, respectively. Cluster I comprised parasite profiles recovered from R patients from Rio de Janeiro and in cluster III, NR samples were prevalent. Cluster II comprised 24 isolates, with 21 from Rio de Janeiro and three from other states, equally distributed between R and NR patients. Additionally, we found that parasites sharing all common genetic characteristics acted differently in response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results are of clinical-epidemiological importance since they demonstrate that populations of L. (V.) braziliensis that exhibit high levels of genetic similarity also display different phenotypes associated with meglumine antimoniate responses in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Leishmania braziliensis/clasificación , Leishmania braziliensis/genética , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/parasitología , Meglumina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organometálicos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Antiprotozoarios/farmacología , Brasil , Niño , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios de Cohortes , ADN de Cinetoplasto/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Agar , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Leishmania braziliensis/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Meglumina/farmacología , Antimoniato de Meglumina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos/farmacología , Fenotipo , Proyectos Piloto , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Polimorfismo Genético , Adulto Joven
3.
J Trop Med ; 2012: 808132, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23304168

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate genetic polymorphism in Leishmania braziliensis population previously typed through isoenzyme electrophoresis, isolated from the same patient in two different moments: (A) before the beginning of treatment and (B) after treatment failure to meglumine antimoniate or reactivation after successful initial treatment. Fifteen pairs of isolates were assessed using the polymorphic molecular marker LSSP-PCR and following the phenetic analysis. The genetic profiles of the 30 samples were grouped in four clusters. Only two patients presented total identity in the A and B isolates. Most isolates presented similarity coefficients varying from 0.63 to 0.91. In this group of patients genetic polymorphisms could be observed indicating low similarity between the pairs of isolates. The results demonstrate the existence of genetic polymorphism between the samples isolated before treatment and after reactivation or treatment failure, suggesting a possible differentiation of the structure of the original parasite population which could be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to treatment or reactivation of lesions in the ATL. This phenomenon is important, although other factors also could be involved in this context and are discussed in this paper.

4.
J Basic Microbiol ; 50 Suppl 1: S107-15, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20806245

RESUMEN

In this study diarrheagenic and uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains were comparatively characterized according to serotype, hemolytic activity, protein polymorphism among housekeeping enzymes, phylogenetic group and urovirulence genes. Intra-serogroup/serotype variations were observed. Hemolytic activity was detected in 100%, 93%, 67% and 39% of UPEC, EAEC, EPEC and ETEC strains, respectively. The alpha-hemolytic phenotype was observed in all pathogenic groups while beta-hemolytic phenotype was less frequent. PCR phylotyping revealed higher prevalence of diarrheagenic E. coli in groups A and D while uropathogenic strains were mainly found in subgroup B2. Amplification assays revealed that 74%, 45% and 22% of UPEC, EAEC and EPEC strains, respectively, carried at least one of the urovirulence sequences. The molecular typing system revealed a pathotype-specific clonal group distribution and showed a closer relationship between the EAEC and UPEC. Additionally, the occurrence of urovirulence traits, especially those related to iron acquisition, was more frequent among EAEC and UPEC than among the other E. coli pathotypes. This observation is of special value considering that the EAEC pathotype constitutes an emerging group of enteropathogens, particularly, in developing countries, and information on their pathogenic and phylogenetic characteristics is still scarce.


Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/genética , Tipificación Molecular , Escherichia coli Uropatógena/genética , Animales , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/clasificación , Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/patogenicidad , Eritrocitos/microbiología , Hemólisis , Hipopituitarismo , Filogenia , Serotipificación , Escherichia coli Uropatógena/clasificación , Escherichia coli Uropatógena/patogenicidad , Virulencia/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA