Ultra-high resolution spectral photon-counting CT outperforms dual layer CT for lung imaging: Results of a phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare lung image quality obtained with ultra-high resolution (UHR) spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) with that of dual-layer CT (DLCT), at standard and low dose levels using an image quality phantom and an anthropomorphic lung phantom. METHODS: An image quality phantom was scanned using a clinical SPCCT prototype and an 8 cm collimation DLCT from the same manufacturer at 10 mGy. Additional acquisitions at 6 mGy were performed with SPCCT only. Images were reconstructed with dedicated high-frequency reconstruction kernels, slice thickness between 0.58 and 0.67 mm, and matrix between 5122 and 10242 mm, using a hybrid iterative algorithm at level 6. Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) for iodine and air inserts, and detectability index (d') were assessed for ground-glass and solid nodules of 2 mm to simulate highly detailed lung lesions. Subjective analysis of an anthropomorphic lung phantom was performed by two radiologists using a five-point quality score. RESULTS: At 10 mGy, noise magnitude was reduced by 29.1 % with SPCCT images compared to DLCT images for all parameters (27.1 ± 11.0 [standard deviation (SD)] HU vs. 38.2 ± 1.0 [SD] HU, respectively). At 6 mGy with SPCCT images, noise magnitude was reduced by 8.9 % compared to DLCT images at 10 mGy (34.8 ± 14.1 [SD] HU vs. 38.2 ± 1.0 [SD] HU, respectively). At 10 mGy and 6 mGy, average NPS spatial frequency (fav) was greater for SPCCT images (0.75 ± 0.17 [SD] mm-1) compared to DLCT images at 10 mGy (0.55 ± 0.04 [SD] mm-1) while remaining constant from 10 to 6 mGy. At 10 mGy, TTF at 50 % (f50) was greater for SPCCT images (0.92 ± 0.08 [SD] mm-1) compared to DLCT images (0.67 ± 0.06 [SD] mm-1) for both inserts. At 6 mGy, f50 decreased by 1.1 % for SPCCT images, while remaining greater compared to DLCT images at 10 mGy (0.91 ± 0.06 [SD] mm-1 vs. 0.67 ± 0.06 [SD] mm-1, respectively). At both dose levels, d' were greater for SPCCT images compared to DLCT for all clinical tasks. Subjective analysis performed by two radiologists revealed a greater median image quality for SPCCT (5; Q1, 4; Q3, 5) compared to DLCT images (3; Q1, 3; Q3, 3). CONCLUSION: UHR SPCCT outperforms DLCT in terms of image quality for lung imaging. In addition, UHR SPCCT contributes to a 40 % reduction in radiation dose compared to DLCT.

Proposal for a computed tomography score to predict major complications requiring hospitalization after percutaneous lung biopsy: a single-center retrospective study.

Background: Image-guided percutaneous lung biopsy (PLB) may lead to major complications requiring hospitalization. This study aims to evaluate the rate of major PLB complications and determine a predictive computed tomography (CT) score to define patients requiring hospitalization due to these complications. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all PLBs performed from July 2019 to December 2020 in Nimes University Hospital, France. Patients who were undergoing thermo-ablation during the same procedure or for whom PLB procedure data were not available were excluded. All major complications leading to hospitalization were recorded. A Percutaneous Image-guided Lung biopsy In/out Patient score (PILIP) based on variables significantly associated with major complications was calculated by multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 240 consecutive patients (160 men, 80 women; mean age: 67.3±10.5 years) were included. The major complication rate was 10.4%. Length of lung parenchyma traversed <20 vs. 20-40 mm [P=0.017, odds ratio (OR) =5.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-18.92] and vs. >40 mm (P=0.010, OR =6.15; 95% CI: 1.54-24.53), middle vs. superior lobar location (P=0.011, OR =6.34; 95% CI: 1.53-26.31), emphysema along the needle pathway (P<0.0001, OR =10.96; 95% CI: 3.61-33.28), and pleural/scissural attraction (P=0.023, OR =3.50; 95% CI: 1.19-10.32) were independently associated with major complications. Based on these parameters, the PILIP made it possible to differentiate low-risk patients (PILIP <4) from those at high risk (PILIP ≥4) of major complications with 0.40 sensitivity (95% CI: 0.21-0.59), 0.95 specificity (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), a positive predictive value of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.28-0.72) and a negative predictive value of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97). Conclusions: PLB showed a major complication rate of 10.4%. The PILIP is an easy-to-use CT score for differentiating patients at a low or high risk of complications requiring hospitalization.

Comparison between artificial intelligence solution and radiologist for the detection of pelvic, hip and extremity fractures on radiographs in adult using CT as standard of reference.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for the detection of fractures of pelvic, proximal femur or extremity fractures in adults with radiologist interpretation of radiographs, using standard dose CT examination as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 94 adult patients with suspected bone fractures who underwent a standard dose CT examination and radiographs of the pelvis and/or hip and extremities at our institution between January 2022 and August 2023. For all patients, an AI solution was used retrospectively on the radiographs to detect and localize bone fractures of the pelvis and/or hip and extremities. Results of the AI solution were compared to the reading of each radiograph by a radiologist using McNemar test. The results of standard dose CT examination as interpreted by a senior radiologist were used as the standard of reference. RESULT: A total of 94 patients (63 women; mean age, 56.4 ± 22.5 [standard deviation] years) were included. Forty-seven patients had at least one fracture, and a total of 71 fractures were deemed present using the standard of reference (25 hand/wrist, 16 pelvis, 30 foot/ankle). Using the standard of reference, the analysis of radiographs by the AI solution resulted in 58 true positive, 13 false negative, 33 true negative and 15 false positive findings, yielding 82 % sensitivity (58/71; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 71-89 %), 69 % specificity (33/48; 95 % CI: 55-80 %), and 76 % accuracy (91/119; 95 % CI: 69-84 %). Using the standard of reference, the reading of the radiologist resulted in 65 true positive, 6 false negative, 42 true negative and 6 false positive findings, yielding 92 % sensitivity (65/71; 95 % CI: 82-96 %), 88 % specificity (42/48; 95 % CI: 75-94 %), and 90 % accuracy (107/119; 95 % CI: 85-95 %). The radiologist outperformed the AI solution in terms of sensitivity (P = 0.045), specificity (P = 0.016), and accuracy (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, the radiologist outperformed the AI solution for the diagnosis of pelvic, hip and extremity fractures of the using radiographs. This raises the question of whether a strong standard of reference for evaluating AI solutions should be used in future studies comparing AI and human reading in fracture detection using radiographs.

Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction by a new automatic tool on a pocket ultrasound device: Concordance study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is one of the primary objectives of echocardiography. The gold standard assessment technique in emergency medicine is eyeballing. A new tool is now available on pocket ultrasound devices (PUD): automatic LVEF. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between LVEF values estimated by automatic LVEF with PUD and by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS: This was a prospective, monocentric, and observational study. All adult patients with an indication for cardiac MRI underwent a point-of-care ultrasound. Blinded to the MRI results, the emergency physician assessed LVEF using the automatic PUD tool and by visual evaluation. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included and analyzed. Visual estimation of LVEF was feasible for all patients and automatic evaluation for 52 (87%) patients. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient between automatic ejection fraction with PUD and by cardiac MRI was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.03-0.40). CONCLUSION: Concordance between LVEF estimated by the automatic ejection fraction with PUD and LVEF estimated by MRI was non-existent.

Abdominal image quality and dose reduction with energy-integrating or photon-counting detectors dual-source CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image-quality and dose reduction potential using a photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system by comparison with two different dual-source CT (DSCT) systems using two phantoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed using two DSCT systems (DSCT1 [Somatom Force] and DSCT2 [Somatom Pro.Pulse]) and one PCCT system (Naeotom Alpha) at four dose levels (13/6/3.4/1.8 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude and noise texture and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Detectability indexes (d') were computed to model the detection of abdominal lesions: one unenhanced high-contrast task, one contrast-enhanced high-contrast task and one unenhanced low-contrast task. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by two radiologists. RESULTS: For all dose levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCTs. For all CT systems, similar noise texture values were found at 13 and 6 mGy, but the greatest noise texture values were found for DSCT2 and the lowest for PCCT at 3.4 and 1.8 mGy. For high-contrast inserts, similar or lower f50 values were found with PCCT than with DSCT1 and the opposite pattern was found for the low-contrast insert. For the three simulated lesions, d' values were greater with PCCT than with DSCTs. Abdominal images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists for all dose levels with PCCT and for 13 and 6 mGy with DSCTs. CONCLUSION: By comparison with DSCTs, PCCT reduces image-noise and improves detectability of simulated abdominal lesions without altering the spatial resolution and image texture. Image-quality obtained with PCCT seem to indicate greater potential for dose optimization than those obtained with DSCTs.

Ultra-low dose chest CT for the diagnosis of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare ultra-low dose (ULD) and standard low-dose (SLD) chest computed tomography (CT) in terms of radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic value for diagnosing pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective board-approved study consecutive patients with HHT referred to a reference center for screening and/or follow-up chest CT examination were prospectively included from December 2020 to January 2022. Patients underwent two consecutive non-contrast chest CTs without dose modulation (i.e., one ULD protocol [80 kVp or 100 kVp, CTDIvol of 0.3 mGy or 0.6 mGy] and one SLD protocol [140 kVp, CTDIvol of 1.3 mGy]). Objective image noises measured at the level of tracheal carina were compared between the two protocols. Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = insufficient to 4 = excellent). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ULD CT for diagnosing pulmonary AVM with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter were calculated along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using SLD images as the standard of reference. RESULTS: A total of 44 consecutive patients with HHT (31 women; mean age, 42 ± 16 [standard deviation (SD)] years; body mass index, 23.2 ± 4.5 [SD] kg/m2) were included. Thirty-four pulmonary AVMs with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter were found with SLD images versus 35 with ULD images. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, and predictive negative value of ULD CT for the diagnosis of PAVM were 100% (34/34; 95% CI: 90-100), 96% (18/19; 95% CI: 74-100), 97% (34/35; 95% CI: 85-100) and 100% (18/18; 95% CI: 81-100), respectively. A significant difference in diagnostic confidence scores was found between ULD (3.8 ± 0.4 [SD]) and SLD (3.9 ± 0.1 [SD]) CT images (P = 0.03). No differences in overall image quality scores were found between ULD CT examinations (3.9 ± 0.2 [SD]) and SLD (4 ± 0 [SD]) CT examinations (P = 0.77). Effective radiation dose decreased significantly by 78.8% with ULD protocol, with no significant differences in noise values between ULD CT images (16.7 ± 5.0 [SD] HU) and SLD images (17.7 ± 6.6 [SD] HU) (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: ULD chest CT provides 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of treatable pulmonary AVM with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter, leading to a 78.8% dose-saving compared with a standard low-dose protocol.

Determining the Optimal Energy Level of Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Dual-Source CT for Diagnosis of Bowel Obstruction and Colitis.

Images from 64 patients undergoing an enhanced abdominal-pelvis scan at portal phase in dual-energy CT mode for the diagnosis of colitis or bowel obstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Acquisitions were performed on a third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) 100/Sn150 kVp. Mixed images were generated, as well as virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 40/50/60/70 keV. Objective image quality was assessed on VMIs and mixed images by measuring contrast, noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Noise, smoothing and overall image quality were subjectively analyzed by two radiologists using Likert scales. For both patient groups, the noise decreased significantly according to the energy level from 40 to 60 keV by -47.2 ± 24.0% for bowel obstruction and -50.4 ± 18.2% for colitis. It was similar between 60 and 70 keV (p = 0.475 and 0.059, respectively). Noise values were significantly higher in VMIs than in mixed images, except for 70 keV (p = 0.53 and 0.071, respectively). Similar results were observed for contrast values, with a decrease between 40 and 70 keV of -56.3 ± 7.9% for bowel obstruction -56.2 ± 10.9% for colitis. The maximum CNR value was found at 60 keV compared to other energy levels and mixed images, but there was no significant difference with the other energy levels apart from 70 keV (-9.7 ± 9.8%) for bowel obstruction and 40 keV (-6.6 ± 8.2%) and 70 keV (-5.8 ± 9.2%) for colitis. The VMIs at 60 keV presented higher scores for all criteria for bowel obstruction and colitis, with no significant difference in smoothing score compared to mixed images (p = 0.119 and p = 0.888, respectively).

Impact of the automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) system on virtual monoenergetic image quality for dual-source CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) quality in dual-source CT(DSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions were performed on DSCT using the Mercury phantom. The acquisition parameters for an abdomen-pelvic examination with single-energy CT(SECT) and dual-energy CT(DECT) imaging were used. Acquisitions were performed for each imaging mode using fixed mAs and ATCM. The mAs value was set to obtain a volume CT dose index of 11 mGy in fixed mAs acquisitions. This value was used as the reference mAs in ATCM acquisitions. The noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function at 40,50,60 and 70 keV levels were computed on VMIs and SECT images. The detectability index (d') was calculated for a lesion with an iodine concentration of 10 mg/mL. RESULTS: The noise magnitude on VMIs was higher with the ATCM system than with fixed mAs for all energy levels and section diameters of 21,26 and 31 cm. The noise texture and spatial resolution were similar between the fixed mAs and ATCM acquisitions for both imaging modes. The d' values were lower for all energy levels with ATCM than with fixed mAs acquisitions for 21 and 26 cm diameters by -39.82 ± 9.32%, similar at 31 cm diameter -4.13 ± 0.24% and higher at 36 cm diameter 10.40 ± 6.69%. It was higher on VMIs at all energy levels compared to SECT images. CONCLUSIONS: The ATCM system could be used with DECT imaging to optimize patient exposure without changing the noise texture and spatial resolution of VMIs compared to fixed mAs and SECT.

First Results of a New Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Quality and Liver Metastasis Conspicuity for Abdominal Low-Dose CT.

The study's aim was to assess the impact of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm (Precise Image; DLR) on image quality and liver metastasis conspicuity compared with an iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR). This retrospective study included all consecutive patients with at least one liver metastasis having been diagnosed between December 2021 and February 2022. Images were reconstructed using level 4 of the IR algorithm (i4) and the Standard/Smooth/Smoother levels of the DLR algorithm. Mean attenuation and standard deviation were measured by placing the ROIs in the fat, muscle, healthy liver, and liver tumor. Two radiologists assessed the image noise and image smoothing, overall image quality, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales. The study included 30 patients (mean age 70.4 ± 9.8 years, 17 men). The mean CTDIvol was 6.3 ± 2.1 mGy, and the mean dose-length product 314.7 ± 105.7 mGy.cm. Compared with i4, the HU values were similar in the DLR algorithm at all levels for all tissues studied. For each tissue, the image noise significantly decreased with DLR compared with i4 (p < 0.01) and significantly decreased from Standard to Smooth (-26 ± 10%; p < 0.01) and from Smooth to Smoother (-37 ± 8%; p < 0.01). The subjective image assessment confirmed that the image noise significantly decreased between i4 and DLR (p < 0.01) and from the Standard to Smoother levels (p < 0.01), but the opposite occurred for the image smoothing. The highest scores for overall image quality and conspicuity were found for the Smooth and Smoother levels.