The Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire shows better discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings than the Eckardt score: Results from a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Grading dysphagia is crucial for clinical management of patients. The Eckardt score (ES) is the most commonly used for this purpose. We aimed to compare the ES with the recently developed Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) in terms of their correlation and discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings and evaluate the effect of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms on both. METHODS: Symptomatic patients referred for high-resolution manometry (HRM) were prospectively recruited from seven centers in Spain and Latin America. Clinical data and several scores (ES, BEDQ, GERDQ) were collected and contrasted to HRM findings. Standard statistical analysis was performed. KEY RESULTS: 426 patients were recruited, 31.2% and 41.5% being referred exclusively for dysphagia and GERD symptoms, respectively. Both BEDQ and ES were independently associated with achalasia. Only BEDQ was independently associated with being referred for dysphagia and with relevant HRM findings. ROC curve analysis for achalasia diagnosis showed AUC of 0.809 for BEDQ and 0.765 for ES, with the main difference being higher BEDQ sensitivity (80.0% vs 70.8% for ES). GERDQ independently predicted ES but not BEDQ. In the absence of dysphagia (BEDQ = 0), GERD symptoms significantly determine ES. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our study suggests both the BEDQ and ES can complementarily describe symptomatic burden in achalasia. BEDQ has several advantages over the ES in the dysphagia evaluation, basically due to its higher sensitivity for manometric diagnosis and independence of GERD symptoms. ES should be used as an achalasia-specific metric, while BEDQ is a better symptom-generic evaluating tool.

The HLA-DQß1 insertion is a strong achalasia risk factor and displays a geospatial north-south gradient among Europeans.

Idiopathic achalasia is a severe motility disorder of the esophagus and is characterized by a failure of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax due to a loss of neurons in the myenteric plexus. Most recently, we identified an eight-amino-acid insertion in the cytoplasmic tail of HLA-DQß1 as strong achalasia risk factor in a sample set from Central Europe, Italy and Spain. Here, we tested whether the HLA-DQß1 insertion also confers achalasia risk in the Polish and Swedish population. We could replicate the initial findings and the insertion shows strong achalasia association in both samples (Poland P=1.84 × 10(-04), Sweden P=7.44 × 10(-05)). Combining all five European data sets - Central Europe, Italy, Spain, Poland and Sweden - the insertion is achalasia associated with Pcombined=1.67 × 10(-35). In addition, we observe that the frequency of the insertion shows a geospatial north-south gradient. The insertion is less common in northern (around 6-7% in patients and 2% in controls from Sweden and Poland) compared with southern Europeans (~16% in patients and 8% in controls from Italy) and shows a stronger attributable risk in the southern European population. Our study provides evidence that the prevalence of achalasia may differ between populations.

Common variants in the HLA-DQ region confer susceptibility to idiopathic achalasia.

Idiopathic achalasia is characterized by a failure of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax due to a loss of neurons in the myenteric plexus. This ultimately leads to massive dilatation and an irreversibly impaired megaesophagus. We performed a genetic association study in 1,068 achalasia cases and 4,242 controls and fine-mapped a strong MHC association signal by imputing classical HLA haplotypes and amino acid polymorphisms. An eight-residue insertion at position 227-234 in the cytoplasmic tail of HLA-DQß1 (encoded by HLA-DQB1*05:03 and HLA-DQB1*06:01) confers the strongest risk for achalasia (P=1.73×10(-19)). In addition, two amino acid substitutions in the extracellular domain of HLA-DQα1 at position 41 (lysine encoded by HLA-DQA1*01:03; P=5.60×10(-10)) and of HLA-DQß1 at position 45 (glutamic acid encoded by HLA-DQB1*03:01 and HLA-DQB1*03:04; P=1.20×10(-9)) independently confer achalasia risk. Our study implies that immune-mediated processes are involved in the pathophysiology of achalasia.

Lack of association between the functional c-kit rs6554199 polymorphism and achalasia in a Spanish population.

A functional polymorphism (rs6554199) located in the c-kit gene was associated with achalasia in a Turkish cohort. Our aim was to replicate this result in a large cohort of Spanish patients and controls. A case-control study was performed with 282 Spanish white unrelated patients and 687 healthy controls. All were genotyped for SNP rs6554199 using a TaqMan Assay. No association was found in our study (T allele frequency in patients and controls: 47.3% vs. 49.4%; OR=0.92, p=0.41). The finding that the T allele of the c-kit rs6554199 polymorphism could be associated with achalasia as reported in a Turkish population could not be replicated in a Spanish cohort. Although ethnic differences might explain these data, the sample size that compromised the statistical power in the Turkish cohort and is higher in our study, led us to suggest that the reported association seems to be a false positive.

Association of IL10 promoter polymorphisms with idiopathic achalasia.

Idiopathic achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder of unknown etiology. A wealth of evidence supports the concept that achalasia is an immune-mediated disease. According to this evidence, achalasia has been significantly associated with specific alleles of the human leukocyte antigen class II, PTPN22 and IL23R. Several studies have demonstrated association of the IL10 gene with different inflammatory disorders. Our aim was to evaluate the role of functional IL10 promoter polymorphisms in susceptibility to idiopathic achalasia. A case-control study was performed with the -1082, -819, and -592 IL10 promoter polymorphisms in 282 patients and 529 controls and in an independent replication set of 75 patients and 575 controls. The GCC haplotype of the IL10 promoter was reported to be associated with a lower risk of achalasia in the discovery sample (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.98, p = 0.029). This association was validated in a replication set (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48-1.00, p = 0.04). In the combined analysis no heterogeneity was observed between the 2 sample sets and the GCC haplotype was significantly associated with the disease (OR(MH) = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63-0.91, p = 0.003). Our results provide the first evidence for an association between IL10 promoter polymorphisms and idiopathic achalasia, suggesting that the interleukin-10 cytokine may contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease.

Laparoscopic approach to esophageal perforation secondary to pneumatic dilation for achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Perforation of the esophagus after pneumatic dilation for achalasia is a severe complication which should be treated accurately in order to obtain a successful immediate outcome and a satisfactory result for the underlying condition. METHODS: Five consecutive patients presenting with distal esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia were included in this study. All patients had gastrografin swallow performed to confirm the perforation, and one patient was also submitted to flexible esophagoscopy. Laparoscopic approach was performed in all patients with five portals. The phrenoesophageal membrane was opened on its anterior aspect. The distal esophagus was dissected free, and perforations were identified with the help of methylene blue or milk administration through the esophageal tube. All perforations were sutured with interrupted absorbable sutures. Contralateral myotomy and partial anterior Dor fundoplication completed the operation. Endoscopic control of length of myotomy and watertightness of mucosal closure was performed in all cases. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. After surgery all patients were maintained with nil per os until a barium swallow showed no leakage. One patient had a radiologic leakage sustained for 1 week. All patients were dismissed uneventfully. At 6 months after surgery, esophageal manometry was performed. Mean lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure had fallen from 30 to 8.7 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy offers an excellent approach to treat distal esophageal instrumental perforations, perhaps even better than open surgery. Suture of the perforation, contralateral myotomy and partial anterior fundoplication is a good option in the treatment of perforated achalasia after pneumatic dilation.