Dermal penetration of propylene glycols: measured absorption across human abdominal skin in vitro and comparison with a QSAR model.

The dermal penetration of undiluted monopropylene glycol (MPG) and dipropylene glycol (DPG) has been measured in vitro using human abdominal skin under conditions of infinite dose application, and the results compared with predictions from the SKINPERM QSAR model (ten Berge, 2009). The measured steady-state penetration rates (Jss) for MPG and DPG were 97.6 and 39.3 µg/cm2/h, respectively, and the permeability coefficients (Kp) were 9.48×10(-5) cm/h for MPG and 3.85×10(-5) cm/h for DPG. In comparison, the SKINPERM model slightly over-predicted Jss and Kp for MPG and DPG by between 2.6- and 5.1-fold, respectively. The model predictions of 254 µg/cm2/h and 24.6×10(-5) cm/h for MPG, and 202 µg/cm2/h and 19.8×10(-5) cm/h for DPG were in fairly good agreement with the measured values. Further, the model predicted a Jss of 101 µg/cm2/h and a Kp of 9.9×10(-5) cm/h for the homologue tripropylene glycol. Assuming that the measured Jss was the same under conditions of finite dose application (taken to be 10 µL/ cm2) and was maintained over a 24-h period (both conservative assumptions), the relative dermal absorption of the applied dose was estimated to be 23% (0.96%/h) for MPG and 9% (0.39%/h) for DPG. However, the extrapolation for MPG may be further overestimated due to possible residence in the stratum corneum under infinite conditions of exposure that would not be applicable to a finite loading dose.

Mortality update of workers exposed to acrylonitrile in The Netherlands.

To study the possible carcinogenic effects of acrylonitrile, we updated the follow up of a cohort of 2842 acrylonitrile workers. The comparison group consisted of 3961 workers from a nitrogen fixation plant. Industrial hygiene assessments quantified past exposure to acrylonitrile, 8-hour averages as well as peak exposure, the use of personal protective equipment, and exposure to other potential carcinogenic agents. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated to adjust for the effect of age distribution, length of follow up, and temporal changes in background mortality rates. Cumulative dose-effect relations were determined for 3 exposure categories and 3 latency periods. The results show that no cancer excess seems related to exposure to acrylonitrile. This additional follow up of a cohort of 2842 workers exposed to acrylonitrile further supports the notion that occupational exposures to acrylonitrile that have occurred in the past have not noticeably increased workers' cancer mortality rates.