RESUMEN
The long-term neurodevelopment of children born with oesophageal atresia (OA) is unclear. Therefore, we assessed the neurocognitive domains and their predictors. Patients born with OA between February 2006 and December 2014, who were routinely seen at eight years as part of a structured prospective longitudinal follow-up program, were included. Main outcome measures were need for school support, performance in various neurocognitive domains and potential predictors of neurocognitive problems. We analysed data of 65 children with a mean (SD) age of 8.1 (0.2) years, of whom 89% with OA type C. Thirty-five (54%) surgical corrections were minimally invasive; the median (interquartile range) duration of exposure to anaesthetics in the first 24 months was 398 (296 - 710) minutes. Forty-four (68%) attended regular education without extra support and intelligence was within normal range (99-108). More than 50% had z-scores ≤ -2 on one or more neurocognitive domains, of which attention was the most frequently affected domain. The speed on the sustained attention task was significantly below normal (z-score -1.48 (2.12), p < .001), as was fluctuation of sustained attention (z-score -3.19 (3.80), p < .001). The minimally invasive approach and a lower socio-economic status (both p = 0.006) proved significant predictors for sustained attention problems in multivariable analyses. Conclusion: Children who undergo minimally invasive surgery for OA correction are at risk for sustained attention problems at school age. Future studies unravelling the effects of perioperative events on neurodevelopment should lead to optimal surgical, anaesthesiological, and intensive care management in the neonatal period. What is Known: ⢠School-aged children born with oesophageal atresia have normal intelligence but problems with sustained attention at eight years. What is New: ⢠Oesophageal atresia patients, who undergo minimally invasive surgery or who have a background of lower socioeconomic status are at serious risk for sustained attention problems at school age. ⢠Moreover, those who have been intubated for a longer period are at risk for stronger fluctuations in sustained attention.
Asunto(s)
Atresia Esofágica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Humanos , Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Niño , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con HiperactividadRESUMEN
Previous studies have frequently reported neurocognitive deficits in children born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) at school age, which may contribute to academic difficulties. Yet, age at onset of these deficits is currently unknown. We evaluated neurocognitive skills with possible determinants in preschool children born with CDH. Eligible 5-year-old children born with CDH (2010-2015) who participated in our prospective structural follow-up program were included. We used the WPPSI-III to assess intelligence, subtests of the Kaufman-ABC for memory, and NEPSY-II to assess inhibition and attention. We included 63 children. Their test scores generally were within or significantly above normal range: total IQ = 103.4 (15.7) (p = 0.13); Verbal memory = 10.2 (2.8) (p = 0.61); Visuospatial memory = 11.4 (2.6) (p < 0.01); Inhibition = 10.5 (2.2), (p = 0.10). In univariable analyses, length of ICU-stay was negatively associated with IQ, and maximum vasoactive inotropic score and open repair were negatively associated with inhibition skills. In multivariable regression analysis, the latter association remained (B = 5.52, p = 0.04 (CI 0.32-10.72)). Conclusions: In these tested 5-year-old children born with CDH, neuropsychological outcome was normal on average. While problems in 8-year-olds are common, we did not detect onset of these problems at age 5. Yet, we cannot rule out that this cohort had a relatively mild level of disease severity; therefore, conclusions should be interpreted with caution. However, given the growing-into-deficit hypothesis, meaning that deviant brain development in early life is revealed once higher cognitive brain functions are demanded, follow-up should be conducted up to school age, and preferably beyond. What is Known: ⢠Children born with CDH are at risk for academic difficulties at school age. ⢠Whether these difficulties can be detected already before school age is unknown. What is New: ⢠At age 5 years, intelligence, inhibition, attention, and memory skills were all within normal range, or even above, in children with CDH. This is supportive of the growing-into-deficit hypothesis in this patient population. ⢠Those who underwent open surgical correction had poorer inhibition skills than those who were corrected with minimal access surgery.
Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Preescolar , Humanos , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Encéfalo , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
Children with congenital anatomical foregut anomalies and children treated with neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at risk for neurocognitive morbidities. We evaluated the association between the parent-reported pediatric perceived cognitive functioning (PedsPCF) questionnaire and the parent-reported behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF) as well as neuropsychological assessments (NPA). We included 8-, 12- and 17-year-old participants who had joined a prospective follow-up program between 2017 and 2019. Self- and parental proxy-reported PedsPCF and proxy-reported BRIEF scores and their mutual association were evaluated. In total, 168 participants were included. Self- and proxy-reported PedsPCF scores were significantly below normal (mean (SD) z-score: −0.35 (0.88), p < 0.001; −0.36 (1.06), p < 0.001, respectively). Total BRIEF scores were significantly above normal (mean (SD) z-score 0.33 (0.98), p < 0.001). Proxy-reported PedsPCF scores and the Metacognition Index subscores of the BRIEF correlated strongly (τ = 0.551, p < 0.001). Self-reported PedsPCF scores were not associated with NPA test scores. Proxy-reported PedsPCF scores were positively associated with multiple NPA test scores, especially intelligence (R2 = 0.141). The proxy-reported PedsPCF revealed cognitive problems more often than the BRIEF in school-aged children who had survived neonatal critical illness. The proxy-reported PedsPCF may support clinical decision-making regarding the need for extensive neuropsychological assessments.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To longitudinally evaluate self-reported and proxy-reported health status (HS) and quality of life (QoL) of school-aged children born with esophageal atresia (EA). METHODS: We obtained Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (HS) and DUX-25 (QoL) questionnaires from children born with EA between 1999 and 2011 at 8 and/or 12âyears old. Children completed self-reports during neuropsychological assessments in a prospective longitudinal follow-up program. Parents filled out proxy-reports at home. Total and subscale scores were evaluated longitudinally and compared with sex-specific reference norms. RESULTS: In total, 110 participants (62% boys) were included. Self-reported HS improved significantly between 8 and 12âyears for both boys (mean difference [md] 4.35, effect size [ES] 0.54, Pâ=â0.009) and girls (md 3.26, ES 0.63, Pâ=â0.004). Proxy-reported HS tended to improve over time, while self-reported and proxy-reported QoL tended to decline. Self-reported HS at 8âyears was below normal for both boys (md -5.44, ES -0.35, Pâ<â0.001) and girls (md -7.61, ES -0.32, Pâ<â0.001). Girls' self-reported QoL was below normal at 8 (md -5.00, ES -0.18, Pâ=â0.019) and 12âyears (md -10.50, ES -0.26, Pâ=â0.001). Parents reported normal HS at both ages, whereas they rated the QoL of their daughters below normal at 12âyears (md -10.00, ES -0.16, Pâ=â0.022). All above results are total scores. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported and proxy-reported HS of children with EA improved between 8 and 12âyears, while their QoL tended to decline. We recommend to consider HS and QoL as two separate concepts and to measure both simultaneously and longitudinally when evaluating the burden of disease.
Asunto(s)
Atresia Esofágica , Calidad de Vida , Niño , Atresia Esofágica/psicología , Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Padres/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: To investigate longitudinal functional and neuropsychological outcomes 3-6 and 24 months after paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Further, to explore the association between paediatric cerebral performance category (PCPC) and intelligence. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal single center study including children (0-17 years) with OHCA, admitted to the PICU of a tertiary care hospital between 2012 and 2017. Survivors were assessed during an outpatient multidisciplinary follow-up program 3-6 and 24 months post-OHCA. Functional and neuropsychological outcomes were assessed through interviews, neurological exam, and validated neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: The total eligible cohort consisted of 49 paediatric OHCA survivors. The most common cause of OHCA was arrhythmia (33%). Median age at time of OHCA was 48 months, 67% were males. At 3-6 and 24 months post-OHCA, respectively 74 and 73% had a good PCPC score, defined as 1-2. Compared with normative data, OHCA children obtained worse sustained attention and processing speed scores 3-6 (n = 26) and 24 (n = 27) months post-OHCA. At 24 months, they also obtained worse intelligence, selective attention and cognitive flexibility scores. In children tested at both time-points (n = 19), no significant changes in neuropsychological outcomes were found over time. Intelligence scores did not correlate with PCPC. CONCLUSION: Although paediatric OHCA survivors had a good PCPC score 3-6 and 24 months post-OHCA, they obtained worse scores on important neuropsychological domains such as intelligence and executive functioning (attention and cognitive flexibility). Follow-up should continue over a longer life span in order to fully understand the long-term impact of OHCA in childhood.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Niño , Función Ejecutiva , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the prenatal frame of reference of omphalocele (ie, survival of fetuses) with that after birth (ie, survival of liveborn neonates), and to assess physical growth and neurodevelopment in children with minor or giant omphalocele up to 2 years of age. DESIGN: We included fetuses and neonates diagnosed in 2000-2012. Physical growth (SD scores, SDS) and mental and motor development at 12 and 24 months were analysed using general linear models, and outcomes were compared with reference norms. Giant omphalocele was defined as defect ≥5 cm, with liver protruding. RESULTS: We included 145 fetuses and neonates. Of 126 (87%) who were diagnosed prenatally, 50 (40%) were liveborn and 35 (28%) survived at least 2 years. Nineteen (13%) neonates were diagnosed after birth. Of the 69 liveborn neonates, 52 (75%) survived and 42 children (81% of survivors) were followed longitudinally. At 24 months, mean (95% CI) height and weight SDS were significantly below 0 in both minor (height: -0.57 (-1.05 to -0.09); weight: -0.86 (-1.35 to -0.37)) and giant omphalocele (height: -1.32 (-2.10 to -0.54); weight: -1.58 (-2.37 to -0.79)). Mental development was comparable with reference norms in both groups. Motor function delay was found significantly more often in children with giant omphalocele (82%) than in those with minor omphalocele (21%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The prenatal and postnatal frames of reference of omphalocele differ considerably; a multidisciplinary approach in parental counselling is recommended. As many children with giant omphalocele had delayed motor development, we recommend close monitoring of these children and early referral to physical therapy.