Lumbar epidural catheter insertion: the midline vs. the paramedian approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of epidural catheter insertion via the midline or the paramedian approach with regard to ease of catheter insertion, incidence of paraesthesias and efficacy of epidural block. In addition to the type of approach, the prognostic value of Patients characteristics variables with regard to the incidence of paraesthesias was assessed. METHODS: Thirty patients scheduled for surgery under epidural anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups of 15 patients each. Epidural anaesthesia was performed via a midline or paramedian approach using loss of resistance to saline. Variables measured were: time needed to identify the epidural space, time needed for and ease of epidural catheter insertion and the incidence of paraesthesias. After completion of these observations, epidural anaesthesia was established with 150 mg ropivacaine 1%. Efficacy of the epidural block was assessed by the need for intraoperative analgesics and by the patient on a three-point scale (good/fair/poor). RESULTS: Quality of sensory blockade was adequate in both groups. Catheter insertion was significantly faster using the paramedian approach. The difference between the two approaches with regard to the incidence of paraesthesias was not significant, however, there was a trend towards more paraesthesias in the midline group. In the multivariate analysis, type of approach was an independent significant predictor of paraesthesias and we found a trend towards a higher incidence of paraesthesias in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter insertion was faster in the paramedian group and we found a trend towards a higher incidence of paraesthesias with the midline approach.

Transient neurological symptoms with subarachnoid lidocaine: effect of early mobilization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although lidocaine has been used extensively for spinal anaesthesia since 1949, it has been associated with transient neurological symptoms only in the past 10 yr. It has been suggested that early ambulation after spinal anaesthesia, as opposed to traditional 24 h recumbency, might be the causative factor for the development of transient neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of early ambulation on the incidence of transient neurological symptoms after single injection spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine 2%. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing minor surgery under spinal anaesthesia were included. All patients received lidocaine 60 mg. After the establishment of successful subarachnoid block, patients were randomly allocated to two groups of 30 patients. Patients in Group 1 were ambulated as soon as possible, whereas patients in Group 2 were kept recumbent until 6 h after subarachnoid injection. Two days after surgery patients were contacted by a blinded observer and interviewed of transient neurological symptoms using a standardized questionnaire. Patients were asked to express the intensity of pain/discomfort on a verbal rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of transient neurological symptoms (23% vs. 27%). In all patients, symptoms resolved completely within 6-24 h. The median pain score was 5 (range 2-8) in Group 1 and 7 (range 1-8) in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, there is no correlation between the time of ambulation after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine and the incidence of transient neurological symptoms.

[The practice guideline 'Neuraxis blockade and anticoagulation']. / Richtlijn 'Neuraxisblokkade en antistolling'.

In a patient with a coagulation disorder, the administration of a local anaesthetic by means of a needle or via the insertion of a catheter into the epidural space or spinal cavity may lead to bleeding and haematoma formation, with a danger of pressure on the spinal cord or nerve roots. Employing the method of the Dutch Institute for Healthcare (CBO) for the development of practice guidelines, a working group of anaesthesiologists, a haematologist and a hospital chemist have drawn up recommendations for neuraxis blockade in combination with anticoagulant therapy. In patients with a clinically acquired tendency toward increased bleeding, the management is highly dependent on the cause of the bleeding tendency. If the patient uses acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel, the medication must be withdrawn at least 10 days before neuraxis blockade is started. Therapy with glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa-receptor antagonists is an absolute contra-indication for neuraxis blockade. In patients who are using coumarin derivatives, neuraxis blockade results in an increased risk of a neuraxial haematoma. The coumarin derivative should then be withdrawn and replaced by a different form of anticoagulation. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin at the usual prophylactic dosage is not a contra-indication for neuraxis blockade and the risk of a neuraxial haematoma following neuraxis blockade is also not increased significantly by the subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin.

Effect of age on the clinical profile and systemic absorption and disposition of levobupivacaine after epidural administration.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic changes, which may occur with increasing age, could alter the clinical profile of the new local anaesthetic levobupivacaine. We investigated the effect of age on the absorption and disposition kinetics and the neural block characteristics after epidural administration of levobupivacaine 0.75%. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in one of three age groups (Group 1, 18-44 yr; Group 2, 45-70 yr; Group 3, >70 yr). Twenty-five minutes after epidural administration of levobupivacaine (127.5 mg), they received approximately 25 mg deuterium-labelled levobupivacaine (D(3)-levobupivacaine) intravenously. Arterial blood samples were collected until 24 h after the epidural administration. Plasma concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed by compartmental and non-compartmental analysis. Assessments of analgesia and motor block were made at set intervals until complete regression of the block. RESULTS: The upper levels of analgesia in the two oldest groups of patients were 3 dermatomes (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.5-5.0 dermatomes) higher than in the youngest group. The fraction absorbed (F(1)) was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02-013) smaller and the absorption half-life (t(1/2,a1)), characterizing the initial fast absorption phase, 3.6 min (95% CI: 0.8-6.4) shorter in the oldest group compared with the youngest group. CONCLUSIONS: Age influences the pharmacokinetics, in particular the early absorption kinetics, and the neural block characteristics after epidural administration of levobupivacaine. Changes in the upper level of analgesia are best explained by anatomical considerations and possibly pharmacodynamic changes in the elderly.

The systemic absorption and disposition of levobupivacaine 0.5% after epidural administration in surgical patients: a stable-isotope study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Absorption and disposition kinetics can be studied with a stable-isotope method. The aim of this study was to validate a stable-isotope method for levobupivacaine and to derive the relevant pharmacokinetics after epidural administration. METHODS: Eight volunteers (18-32 yr) received approximately 23 mg of both levobupivacaine and deuterium-labelled levobupivacaine simultaneously by intravenous infusion. Venous blood samples were taken for 8 h. Fifteen patients (23-85 yr) received 19 mL levobupivacaine 0.5% (including a 3 mL test dose) epidurally and, 25 min later, approximately 25 mg deuterium-labelled levobupivacaine (D3-levobupivacaine) intravenously. Arterial blood samples were collected for 24 h. Plasma concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plasma concentration-time data were analysed by compartmental and non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Based on the ratio of the normalized areas under the curve of unlabelled and deuterium-labelled levobupivacaine in volunteers, as determined by both compartmental (mean ratio: 1.02, 90% CI: 1.00-1.04) and non-compartmental analysis (mean ratio: 1.02, 90% CI: 1.00-1.03) the two formulations were considered equivalent. In surgical patients the elimination half-life (mean +/- SD: 196 +/- 65 min), total body clearanc (349 +/- 114 mL min(-1)) and volume of distribution at steady state (56 +/- 14 L), derived by compartmental analysis, were similar to those obtained by non-compartmental analysis. The absorption was bi-phasic. The fractio absorbed and half-life of the fast absorption process were 0.22 +/- 0.06 and 5.2 +/- 2.7 min, respectively. Th values for the slow absorption process were 0.84 +/- 0.14 and 386 +/- 91 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: D3-levobupivacaine is pharmacokinetically equivalent to unlabelled levobupivacaine and can be used to study the absorption and disposition kinetics after perineural administration of levobupivacaine in a single experiment.

Mortality associated with anaesthesia: a qualitative analysis to identify risk factors.

From a prospectively defined cohort of patients who underwent either general, regional or combined anaesthesia from 1 January 1995 to 1 January 1997 (n = 869 483), all consecutive patients (n = 811) who died within 24 h or remained unintentionally comatose 24 h after anaesthesia were classified to determine a relationship with anaesthesia. These deaths (n = 119; 15%) were further analysed to identify contributing aspects of the anaesthetic management, other factors and the appropriateness of care. The incidence of 24-h peri-operative death per 10 000 anaesthetics was 8.8 (95% CI 8.2-9.5), of peri-operative coma was 0.5 (0.3-0.6) and of anaesthesia-related death 1.4 (1.1-1.6). Of the 119 anaesthesia-related deaths, 62 (52%) were associated with cardiovascular management, 57 (48%) with other anaesthetic management, 12 (10%) with ventilatory management and 12 (10%) with patient monitoring. Inadequate preparation of the patient contributed to 30 (25%) of the anaesthesia-related deaths. During induction of anaesthesia, choice of anaesthetic technique (n = 18 (15%)) and performance of the anaesthesiologist (n = 8 (7%)) were most commonly associated with death. During maintenance, the most common factors were cardiovascular management (n = 43 (36%)), ventilatory management (n = 12 (10%)) and patient monitoring (n = 12 (10%)). In both the recovery and the postoperative phases, patient monitoring was the most common factor (n = 12 (10%) for both). For cardiovascular, ventilatory and other anaesthetic management, human failure contributed to 89 (75%) deaths and organisational factors to 12 (10%). For inadequate patient monitoring, human factors contributed to 71 (60%) deaths and organisational factors to 48 (40%). Other contributing factors were inadequate communication (30 deaths (25%) for all four aspects of the anaesthetic management) and lack of supervision (particularly for ventilatory management). Inadequate care was delivered in 19 (16%) of the anaesthesia-related deaths with respect to cardiovascular management, in 20 (17%) with respect to ventilatory management, in 18 (15%) with respect to patient monitoring and in 23 (19%) with respect to other anaesthetic management.

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effects of duration spent in the sitting position.

Sixty patients, aged 65-84 yr, undergoing minor urological surgery under spinal anaesthesia remained sitting for 2 (group 1, n = 15), 5 (group 2, n = 15), 10 (group 3, n = 15), or 20 (group 4, n = 15) min after completion of the subarachnoid administration of 3 ml of a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution. They were then placed in the supine position. Analgesia levels were assessed bilaterally using pinprick. Motor block was scored using a 12-point scale. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate were also recorded. Twenty minutes after the injection the upper analgesia levels were lower (P<0.05) in group 4 (median T9.0) than in the groups 1-3 (medians T6.6-T8.5). The highest obtained levels (medians T5.7-T8.0) did not differ between the groups, but occurred later (P<0.05) in group 4 (median 35 min) than in groups 1-3 (medians 19-24 min). There were no significant differences in the maximum degree of motor block or haemodynamic changes between the four study groups.

Epidural infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after major orthopedic surgery: pharmacokinetic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Changing plasma protein concentrations may affect the protein binding and pharmacokinetics of drugs in the postoperative phase. Therefore, the authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, administered by 72-h epidural infusion to provide postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, scheduled for major orthopedic surgery during combined epidural and general anesthesia received a bolus dose of ropivacaine (50 or 75 mg), followed by constant-rate (10 ml/h) epidural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (group 1) or 3 mg/ml (group 2). Total and unbound plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and pipecoloxylidide and plasma concentrations of alpha1-acid glycoprotein were determined. In addition, the urinary excretion of ropivacaine and major metabolites was measured. RESULTS: Total plasma concentrations of ropivacaine increased steadily during the infusion, reaching 2.7 +/- 0.7 and 2.9 +/- 0.5 mg/l in groups 1 and 2 after 72 h constant-rate infusion. Unbound ropivacaine concentrations reached average steady state levels of approximately 0.06 and 0.07 mg/l. Total and unbound concentrations of pipecoloxylidide increased to 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 0.4 +/- 0.2 mg/l (group 1) and 1.2 +/- 0.4 and 0.5 +/- 0.1 mg/l (group 2) after 72 h infusion. alpha1-Acid glycoprotein concentrations initially decreased, but thereafter increased steadily to approximately twice the baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative increases in plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein concentrations enhance the protein binding of ropivacaine and pipecoloxylidide, causing divergence of total and unbound plasma concentrations.

Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia: contribution of plasma protein binding to intra-patient and inter-patient variability.

We have examined the influence of plasma protein binding on inter-individual and intra-individual variability in the effective postoperative analgesic concentration (EAC) of alfentanil and on the performance of the target-controlled infusion system used. Ten patients received standardized anaesthesia and target-controlled alfentanil for postoperative analgesia. Analgesia was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Plasma protein binding of alfentanil was assessed at four different times (on arrival in the recovery room, at 21:00 on the day of surgery and at 09:00 and 21:00 on the first postoperative day). Bias and inaccuracy were examined on the day of surgery and on the first postoperative day. Unbound fractions of alfentanil varied from 5 to 15% and varied in time. In general, the unbound fractions on the day of surgery were higher than those on the first postoperative day. Thirty-nine percent of inter-individual variability in the EAC of alfentanil (range 33-140 ng ml-1) at the onset of therapy could be explained by protein binding. At the other observation times, correlations between unbound fraction and EAC were only moderate. Bias on the day of surgery was -19% and 12% on the first postoperative day (ns). Inaccuracy was 23% and 18%, respectively (ns). We conclude that inter-individual variations in plasma protein binding can explain a significant portion of inter-individual variability in the EAC of alfentanil in the early postoperative phase.

The epidural "top-up" in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: the effect of volume versus dose.

UNLABELLED: The reinforcement of anesthesia by an epidural "top-up" in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia may be explained by a dual mechanism: a volume effect compressing the dural sac and a local anesthetic effect. The purpose of our study was to investigate the relative importance of each of these factors. Fifty patients scheduled for lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five groups comprising 10 patients each. Using a needle-through-needle technique, all patients received a subarachnoid injection of 10 mg of plain bupivacaine and an epidural catheter. After the maximal level of sensory blockade as a result of the subarachnoid injection had been established, an epidural top-up was given according to the randomization code. Patients in Group 1 received 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%; patients in Group 2 received 10 mL of saline; patients in Group 3 received 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5%; patients in Group 4 received 5 mL of saline; and patients in Group 5 received no epidural top-up. The maximal level of sensory blockade was then assessed for an additional 30 min. In Groups 1-4, the maximal level of sensory blockade increased significantly, whereas there was no significant increase in Group 5. There was no significant difference in the increase in the maximal level of sensory blockade among Groups 1-4. We conclude that, under the conditions of our study, there is no difference between 5 and 10 mL with regard to the volume effect of an epidural top-up in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and that to produce an additional local anesthetic effect with bupivacaine, the dose must be larger than 25 mg. IMPLICATIONS: In combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, an epidural "top-up" may increase the maximal level of sensory blockade by means of a volume effect and a local anesthetic effect. In this study, volumes of 5 and 10 mL produced a similar increase, and 25 mg of bupivacaine was insufficient to produce an additional local anesthetic effect.