Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 12(10): 1636-46, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25142183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Three novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently been registered by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency Commission: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. To quantify DOACs in plasma, various dedicated coagulation assays have been developed. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a reference ultra-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method and to evaluate the analytical performance of several coagulation assays for quantification of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. METHODS: The developed UPLC-MS/MS method was validated by determination of precision, accuracy, specificity, matrix effects, lower limits of detection, carry-over, recovery, stability, and robustness. The following coagulation assays were evaluated for accuracy and precision: laboratory-developed (LD) diluted thrombin time (dTT), Hemoclot dTT, Pefakit PiCT, ECA, Liquid anti-Xa, Biophen Heparin (LRT), and Biophen DiXal anti-Xa. Agreement between the various coagulation assays and UPLC-MS/MS was determined with random samples from patients using dabigatran or rivaroxaban. RESULTS: The UPLC-MS/MS method was shown to be accurate, precise, sensitive, stable, and robust. The dabigatran coagulation assay showing the best precision, accuracy and agreement with the UPLC-MS/MS method was the LD dTT test. For rivaroxaban, the anti-factor Xa assays were superior to the PiCT-Xa assay with regard to precision, accuracy, and agreement with the reference method. For apixaban, the Liquid anti-Xa assay was superior to the PiCT-Xa assay. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the various coagulation assays as compared with the UPLC-MS/MS reference method. It is currently unknown whether these differences are clinically relevant. When DOACs are quantified with coagulation assays, comparison with a reference method as part of proficiency testing is therefore pivotal.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Morfolinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , beta-Alanina/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Calibración , Dabigatrán , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/química , Humanos , Control de Calidad , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Rivaroxabán , beta-Alanina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA