Current state about root coverage using soft-tissue substitutes in the presence of noncarious cervical lesions: A literature review.

About half of the cases of gingival recession are associated with the noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL), resulting in combined defects (CDs). NCCL negatively affects the root coverage outcomes. In addition, considering the morbidity associated with graft harvesting, soft-tissue substitutes (STSs) appeared as a suitable option for connective tissue grafts for surgical root coverage. Currently, the literature addressing the therapy of CDs employing STSs is scarce. Thus, the present review aimed to update the literature and outline the future perspectives about root coverage of CDs using STSs. A detailed literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using keywords and Boolean operators. Randomized clinical trials (2) and case reports (6) were included. None of the selected studies reported any adverse effect using STSs. Based on the limited evidence available, we cannot state that STSs may benefit the periodontal clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the long-term outcomes, surgical approaches, and restorative protocols.

Root coverage of gingival recessions with non-carious cervical lesions: a controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) is commonly produced by improper toothbrushing techniques, occlusion trauma, anatomic mal-positioned teeth, and acid erosion, thus sharing the same etiology of gingival recession (GR). The association of a graft to the coronally advanced flap had demonstrated the best long-term outcome for root coverage (RC). However, substitutes for the autogenous graft must be studied. This split-mouth clinical trial investigates the RC and the increase in keratinized tissue (KT) when comparing RC of NCCLs associated with GR with intact roots using an extended coronally advanced flap (ECAF) associated with the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG), a connective tissue replacement graft. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen individuals with bilateral GR were included in the study. One side had a NCCL (TG) and the opposite root was intact (CG). All patients were treated with the ECDF associated with ADMG. All clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and 6 months postoperative. RESULTS: Root coverage means (CG, 69.5 ± 19 and TG. 72.2 ± 16.5; p value = 0.849570) were not significantly different between control and test groups. In addition, the KT had an increase in the follow-up period for both groups. CONCLUSION: GR associated with NCCLs can be successfully treated with the ECDF and ADMG. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients frequently search for GR treatment due to cervical wear, root sensitivity, and compromising aesthetics. The NCCL participates with the same issues. The present study contributes to the literature that GR associated with NCCLs can be successfully treated with the ECAF and the ADMG.

Long-Term Outcome (10 Years) of Multiple Recession-Type Defects Treated With Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft and Coronally Advanced Flap: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence related to the long-term treatment outcomes of acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) plus coronally advanced flap (CAF) for the treatment of multiple recession defects. The aim of this case report is to assess the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of Miller Class I multiple gingival recession-type defects in the maxilla treated with ADMG plus CAF. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old female patient smoking < five cigarettes per day presented multiple adjacent Miller Class I gingival recession in the left maxilla and was referred for treatment with chief complaints of dental hypersensitivity and esthetics. Root coverage was achieved by ADMG + CAF and the patient underwent a 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this case report, mean root coverage obtained at 6 months could not be maintained in the long term. A significant relapse was detected after 10 years, from 80% complete root coverage (CRC) at 6 months to 40% at 10 years. Monitoring, compliance, and reinstructions in oral hygiene techniques seem mandatory for minimizing relapse of gingival recessions after root coverage procedures.