Multilevel analysis of individual- and community-level determinants of birth certification of children under-5 years in Nigeria: evidence from a household survey.

Promoting birth certification is central to achieving legal identity for all - target 16.9 of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Nigeria is not on track to achieve this goal with its low coverage of birth certification (BC). This study is aimed at identifying patterns of BC and its associated individual- and community-level factors, using pooled cross-sectional data from three rounds (2008, 2013, and 2018) of the nationally representative Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey. A weighted sample of 66,630 children aged 0-4 years was included, and a two-level multilevel logistic model which accommodates the hierarchical nature of the data was employed. Of the total sample, 17.1% [95% CI: 16.3-17.9] were reported to be certified. Zamfara state (2.3, 95% CI: 0.93-3.73) and the Federal Capital Territory (36.24, 95% CI: 31.16-41.31) reported the lowest and the highest BC rates. Children with an SBA [AOR = 1.283, 95% CI: 1.164-1.413] and with at least one vaccination [AOR = 1.494, 95% CI: 1.328-1.681] had higher odds of BC. The AOR for mothers with at least one prenatal visit was 1.468 [95% CI: 1.271-1.695], and those aged 30-34 years at the time of birth [AOR = 1.479, 95% CI: 1.236-1.772] had the highest odds. Further, the odds of BC increased the most for mothers [AOR = 1.559, 95% CI: 1.329-1.829] and fathers [AOR = 1.394, 95% CI: 1.211-1.605] who were tertiary-educated. In addition, children in middle-income [AOR = 1.430, 95% CI: 1.197-1.707] or rich wealth HHs [AOR = 1.776, 95% CI: 1.455-2.169] or those whose families had bank accounts [AOR = 1.315, 95% CI: 1.187-1.456] had higher odds. Living in non-poor and within close proximity to a registration center (RC) act as protective factors for BC, while living in poor communities [AOR = 0.613, 95% CI: 0.486-0.774] and more than 10kms from an RC reduce the odds of BC [AOR = 0.466, 95% CI: 0.377-0.576]. The study identified several protective and risk factors which policymakers can adopt as strategic areas for universal birth certification. National and sub-national programs should integrate non-formal institutions as well as target child and maternal utilization of healthcare services to promote BC in Nigeria.

Counting on birth registration: mixed-methods research in two EN-BIRTH study hospitals in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Birth registration marks a child's right to identity and is the first step to establishing citizenship and access to services. At the population level, birth registration data can inform effective programming and planning. In Tanzania, almost two-thirds of births are in health facilities, yet only 26% of children under 5 years have their births registered. Our mixed-methods research explores the gap between hospital birth and birth registration in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. METHODS: The study was conducted in the two Tanzanian hospital sites of the Every Newborn-Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) multi-country study (July 2017-2018). We described the business processes for birth notification and registration and collected quantitative data from women's exit surveys after giving birth (n = 8038). We conducted in-depth interviews (n = 21) to identify barriers and enablers to birth registration among four groups of participants: women who recently gave birth, women waiting for a birth certificate at Temeke Hospital, hospital employees, and stakeholders involved in the national birth registration process. We synthesized findings to identify opportunities to improve birth registration. RESULTS: Standard national birth registration procedures were followed at Muhimbili Hospital; families received birth notification and were advised to obtain a birth certificate from the Registration, Insolvency, and Trusteeship Agency (RITA) after 2 months, for a fee. A pilot programme to improve birth registration coverage included Temeke Hospital; hand-written birth certificates were issued free of charge on a return hospital visit after 42 days. Among 2500 women exit-surveyed at Muhimbili Hospital, 96.3% reported receiving a birth notification form and nearly half misunderstood this to be a birth certificate. Of the 5538 women interviewed at Temeke Hospital, 33.0% reported receiving any documentation confirming the birth of their child. In-depth interview respondents perceived birth registration to be important but considered both the standard and pilot processes in Tanzania complex, burdensome and costly to both families and health workers. CONCLUSION: Birth registration coverage in Tanzania could be improved by further streamlining between health facilities, where most babies are born, and the civil registry. Families and health workers need support to navigate processes to register every child.

Management of intersex newborns: Legal and ethical developments.

Countries worldwide are increasingly expanding male/female binary sex classifications to recognize a third status. Intersex newborns may be included in this third category on birth certification. Parents, families, and communities require counselling and education to accommodate intersex newborns without stigma or discrimination. Whatever its biological or genetic origin, intersex status is a natural if relatively uncommon condition (one in 1500-2000 live births) that distinguishes sex from gender. The tendency of societies to recognize only male and female genders at birth has resulted in intersex children being subjected to invasive surgery and related, sometimes lifelong, medication to confirm them as male or female. On gaining maturity, some are severely distressed and resentful that early gender assignment was mistaken, particularly when excision of testes to enforce femininity or of ovaries to enforce masculinity has denied them procreative capacity. Emerging principles support postponement of such interventions until intersex individuals can make a gender choice for themselves.