Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Med Econ ; 27(sup1): 1-11, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468478

RESUMEN

AIMS: Our cost-of-illness (COI) model adopted payer and societal perspectives over five years to measure the economic burden of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prevalence-based model was constructed to estimate costs and economic consequences for SLE patients in Colombia. The model included four health states: three phenotypes of SLE representing mild, moderate, and severe states and death. The clinical inputs were captured from the published literature and validated by the Delphi panel. Our model measured direct medical and indirect costs, including disease management, transient events, and indirect costs. One-way sensitivity analysis was also performed. RESULTS: The number of Colombian SLE patients was 37,498. The number of SLE patients with mild, moderate, and severe phenotypes was 5343, 28757 and 3,397, respectively. SLE-patients with moderate (Colombian pesos; COP 146 billion) and severe phenotypes (COP276 billion) incurred higher costs than those with mild phenotypes (COP2 billion), over 5 years. The total SLE cost in Colombia over five years from the payer and societal perspectives was estimated to be COP 915 billion and 8 trillion, respectively. The costs per patient per year from the payer and societal perspectives were COP 4,881,902 ($3,510) and COP 46,637,054 ($33,528), respectively. CONCLUSION: The burden of SLE in Colombia over five years is substantially high, mainly due to the consequences of economic loss because it affects women and men of working age, in addition to the costs of SLE management and its consequences, such as flares, infection, and organ damage. Our COI indicated that disease management costs among patients with moderate and severe SLE were substantially higher than those among patients with a mild phenotype. Therefore, more attention should be paid to limiting the progression of SLE and the occurrence of flares, with the need for further economic evaluation of novel treatment strategies that help in disease control.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Colombia/epidemiología , Estrés Financiero , Costo de Enfermedad
2.
J Med Econ ; 27(sup1): 12-22, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468477

RESUMEN

AIMS: Our cost of illness study aimed to provide an estimate of the burden related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the Mexican context. METHODS: Our model was used to simulate the resource utilization and economic consequences over a period of 5 years for patients with SLE in Mexico. The model simulated four health states-three phenotypes of SLE, including mild, moderate, and severe states, and death. Clinical parameters were retrieved from the literature. Resource utilization in our model represents the most common practice in the Mexican healthcare system. These include disease management, transient events (e.g. infections, flares, and complications due to SLE-related organ damage), and indirect costs. Direct non-medical costs were not considered. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of targeted Mexican SLE patients was 57,754. The numbers of SLE patients diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe phenotypes were 8,230, 44,291, and 5,233, respectively. Disease management costs, including the treatment of each phenotype and disease follow-up, were MXN 4 billion ($ 415 million); the costs of transient events (infections, flares, and consequences of SLE-related organ damage) were MXN 5 billion ($ 478 million). Productivity loss costs among adult employed Mexican patients with SLE were estimated at MXN 17 billion ($ 1.6 billion). The total SLE cost in Mexico over 5 years from the payer and societal perspectives is estimated at MXN 9 billion ($ 893 million) and 26 billion ($ 2.5 billion), respectively. Over 5 years, the costs per patient per year from the payer and societal perspectives were MXN 32,131($ 3,095) and MXN 91,661($ 8,830), respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings pointed out the substantial economic burden associated with SLE, including the costs of disease progression and SLE transient events, such as flare-ups, infections, and organ damage, in addition to productivity loss due to work capacity impairment.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Financiero , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Adulto , Humanos , México , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costo de Enfermedad
3.
J Med Econ ; 26(1): 1108-1121, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632452

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PEM + AXI) have demonstrated significant clinical benefits as first-line (1 L) treatments for intermediate/poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of NIVO + IPI versus PEM + AXI from a Brazilian private healthcare system perspective, utilizing a novel approach to estimate comparative efficacy between the treatments. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model (progression-free, progressed, and death) was developed to estimate costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) over a 40-year time horizon. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons between NIVO + IPI and PEM + AXI, clinical data for NIVO + IPI was obtained from CheckMate 214 (NCT02231749) and for PEM + AXI from KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331). A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted to account for the imbalance of treatment effect modifiers between the trials. Patient characteristics, resource use, health state utilities, and costs were based on Brazilian-specific sources. Costs and health outcomes were both discounted by 5% annually in line with Brazilian guidelines. The robustness of the results was evaluated through extensive sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. RESULTS: When comparing the matched versus unmatched OS, PFS, and TTD curves there was no noteworthy difference. NIVO + IPI was associated with cost savings (R$ 350,232), higher LYs (5.54 vs. 4.61), and QALYs (4.74 vs. 3.76) versus PEM + AXI, resulting in NIVO + IPI dominating PEM + AXI. Key model drivers were the treatment duration for PEM, NIVO, and AXI. NIVO + IPI remained dominant in all scenario analyses, which indicated that model results were robust to alternative modelling inputs or assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that NIVO + IPI is estimated to be a life-extending and potentially cost-saving 1 L treatment option when compared with PEM + AXI for intermediate/poor-risk a RCC patients in the Brazilian private healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Axitinib/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Brasil , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Atención a la Salud , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología
4.
J Med Econ ; 26(1): 731-741, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37139828

RESUMEN

AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a severe condition with poor prognosis that places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a treatment available to patients with HCC which addresses some of the limitations of alternative treatment options. A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken into the use of SIRT using Y-90 resin microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intermediate- and late-stage HCC in Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A partitioned-survival model was developed, including a tunnel state for patients downstaged to receive treatments with curative intent. Sorafenib was the selected comparator, a common systemic treatment in Brazil and for which comparative evidence exists. Clinical data were extracted from published sources of pivotal trials, and effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years (LYs). The analysis was conducted from the Brazilian private payer perspective and a lifetime horizon was implemented. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: LYs and QALYs were higher for SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres versus sorafenib (0.27 and 0.20 incremental LYs and QALYs, respectively) and costs were slightly higher for SIRT (R$15,864). The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was R$77,602 per QALY. The ICER was mostly influenced by parameters defining the sorafenib overall survival curve and SIRT had a 73% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$135,761 per QALY (3-times the per-capita gross domestic product in Brazil). Overall, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results indicating that SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres is cost-effective compared with sorafenib. LIMITATIONS: A rapidly evolving treatment landscape in Brazil and worldwide, and the lack of local data for some variables were the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS: SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres is a cost-effective option compared with sorafenib in Brazil.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Radioisótopos de Itrio , Brasil , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Microesferas
5.
J Med Econ ; 23(11): 1340-1344, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897765

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the clinical and economic impact of two PD-L1 IHC assays, SP142 versus 22C3, to identify the eligibility of the patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) to the treatment with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in the Brazilian private healthcare system (BPHS). METHODS: The study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a partitioned-survival model with three mutually exclusive health states: progression-free (PF), progression, and death. Data of progression-free survival and overall survival were extracted from a retrospective exploratory analysis of IMpassion130, an analytical harmonization of PD-L1 IHC assays. The analyses included only direct costs (drug acquisition and management of adverse events) that were based on CBHPM (Classificação Brasileira Hierarquizada de Procedimentos Médicos) and CMED PF18% (Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos) tables. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed as a second-order Monte Carlo Simulation in order to evaluate the uncertainties of the model. RESULTS: The SP142 assay has the potential to improve PFS and generate savings to the BPHS. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was -USD 4,119.43 per month of progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SP142 assay demonstrated to be a dominant alternative compared to 22C3 to guide the treatment with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with aTNBC.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/análisis , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Econométricos , Supervivencia sin Progresión
6.
Toxicol Rep ; 2: 437-442, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28962379

RESUMEN

Although non-innervated, the placenta contains both cholinesterases (ChEs), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE). These enzymes are well-known for their multiple molecular forms. In a first approach, we used recognized specific inhibitors, substrate preferences and non-denaturating gel electrophoresis in order to characterize the ChE profile of term placenta from uncomplicated pregnancy. Results strongly suggest that the predominant cholinesterasic form present was tetrameric BChE. It is well established that both ChEs are targets of cholinesterase-inhibiting organophosphates (OP), one of the most important classes of chemicals actively applied to the environment. However, we have previously reported increased ChEs activity in placenta of rural residents exposed to OP. In the present work, we have studied: 1) whether this finding was reproducible and, 2) whether AChE or BChE up regulation is behind the increase of placental ChE activity. The population studied included forty healthy women who live in an agricultural area. Samples were collected during both the OP pulverization period (PP) and the recess period (RP). The placental ChEs activity increased in PP, evidencing reproducibility of previous results. The analysis of non-denaturating gels revealed that increased activity of total ChE activity in placenta from women exposed to OP may be attributable to tetrameric BChE up-regulation.

7.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 96: 99-102, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23886799

RESUMEN

Cholinesterase (ChE) activity has been used for many years as a biomarker of exposure to organophosphate and carbamate pesticides. Recent studies have demonstrated that there could be biological factors that determine ChE type and levels; thus, juvenile Sergeant major (Abudefduf saxatilis) ChE enzymes were biochemically characterized. ChE enzymes found in the head and trunk were evaluated for their substrate preference and sensitivity to selective inhibitors. The use of the head and trunk was chosen as a strategy to reduce dissection time and to ensure sample uniformity between stations. The results indicated that there are two types of ChE enzymes in the head: acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and atypical butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) that exhibits intermediate characteristics of human AChE and BChE activities. Atypical BChE is predominantly found in the trunk. The results also indicated that the ChE activity found in A. saxatilis may be used as a biomarker in studies monitoring the Mexican Caribbean.


Asunto(s)
Colinesterasas/metabolismo , Perciformes/fisiología , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Acetilcolinesterasa/análisis , Acetilcolinesterasa/metabolismo , Animales , Biomarcadores/análisis , Butirilcolinesterasa/análisis , Butirilcolinesterasa/metabolismo , Región del Caribe , Colinesterasas/análisis , Colinesterasas/química , Plaguicidas/toxicidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA