Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 27(1): 100481, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36709694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dry needling is frequently used for the treatment of neck pain but knowledge about its neurophysiological central effects is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare the immediate effects of a single session of dry needling (DN) and sham needling (SN) on local and distant pressure pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain. METHOD: Participants with chronic idiopathic neck pain were randomly allocated to a DN or SN group. The primary outcome measure was the pressure pain threshold (PPT) at one peripheral location: quadriceps muscle (Q). Secondary outcome measures were local PPTs at the treated (most painful) (tUT) and non-treated upper trapezius muscle (ntUT), absolute and relative conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects and pain during hot water immersion. Patients were assessed at baseline and immediately post intervention. Linear mixed models were used to examine interaction effects as well as between- and within-group differences. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants were included for statistical analysis. Linear mixed model analyses showed no significant "group X time" interaction effects for any of the outcome measures. The relative CPM effect at the Q was significantly higher post-intervention, compared to baseline within the DN group (mean difference= 13.52%; 95% CI: 0.46, 26.59). CONCLUSION: The present study shows no superior effect of DN, compared to SN, in the immediate effect on local and distant PPTs and CPM in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Punción Seca , Humanos , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Dolor de Cuello , Puntos Disparadores
2.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 26(6): 100456, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In healthy people and people with nonspecific chronic spinal pain (nCSP) and/or insomnia, participation in physical activity on a regular basis has several physical and psychological health benefits. However, people with chronic conditions often tend to reduce physical activity participation which can lead to deconditioning over time. Currently, there are no known predictors for an (in)active lifestyle (before and after physical therapy treatment) in people with chronic spinal pain and comorbid insomnia. OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors of pre-treatment moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and to examine determinants for a change in MVPA in response to 14-weeks of active physical therapy treatment in people with nonspecific chronic spinal pain (nCSP) and comorbid insomnia. METHODS: Baseline data and post-treatment data were analyzed for 66 participants. A linear multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine which factors predict MVPA at baseline. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to identify determinants for change in MVPA in response to an active physical therapy treatment. RESULTS: Physical fatigue (b = -0.9; 95%CI: -1.59, -0.15), less limitations in functioning as a result of emotional problems (b = 0.1; 95%CI: 0.03, 0.10), mental fatigue (b = -1.0; 95%CI: -1.67, -0.43), lower general sleep quality (b= 0.7; 95%CI: 0.22, 1.17), and body mass index (b = -0.5; 95%CI: -0.93, -0.16) were significant predictors of baseline MVPA. The regression model explained 33.3% of the total variance in baseline MVPA. The change of MVPA in response to the treatment ranged from a decrease of 17.5 to an increase of 16.6 hours per week. No determinants for change in MVPA after treatment could be identified. CONCLUSION: People with nCSP and comorbid insomnia are more likely to engage in MVPA if they report, at baseline, lower sleep quality, fewer limitations in functioning resulting from emotional problems, lower body mass index, as well as less physical and mental fatigue.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Comorbilidad
3.
Lasers Med Sci ; 37(3): 1427-1440, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767117

RESUMEN

Exercise is often pointed out as an effective form of treatment in the clinical management of chronic neck pain (CNP). However, due to its complex range of causal factors and great diversity of signs and symptoms, other resources such as photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) have been routinely used for the treatment of CNP. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the use of the association of PBMT and therapeutic exercises in relation to pain intensity and neck disability in individuals with CNP. PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Cinahl (via Ebsco), and Central (via Cochrane library) databases were searched using the following terms: "laser," "low-level laser," "photobiomodulation," "light emitting diodes," "phototherapy," "exercise," "chronic neck pain." After verification and implementation of eligibility criteria, seven manuscripts were considered eligible for data analysis. These manuscripts had methodological quality between 5 and 8 points on the PEDro scale. Most studies used low infrared laser therapy to perform PBMT, with a wide range of parameters and energy density between 2 and 7 J/cm2 and a total treatment time between 2 and 6 weeks. Four studies showed significant benefits in terms of pain intensity at short-term follow-up and one at intermediate-term follow-up. However, only one showed a minimal clinically important change. No studies have shown significant improvement in disability. This review demonstrates that the association of PBMT with therapeutic exercises in general promotes significant benefits only for the intensity of pain. However, it does not seem to promote a minimally effective clinical difference in individuals with CNP.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Dolor Crónico/radioterapia , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello/radioterapia , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
4.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 23(4): 346-354, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30145129

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Forward head posture (FHP) and muscular dysfunction are likely contributing factors to chronic neck pain (CNP) but there are inconsistent findings on the relevance of these factors to clinical CNP characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To compare FHP, cervical muscles size and endurance between CNP and asymptomatic participants and to investigate their association with pain and disability and relative involvement of deep/superficial and flexor/extensor muscles. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with CNP and 35 asymptomatic participants were included in this case-control study. FHP in standing, extensor and flexor muscles endurance and dimensions were assessed using digital photography, clinical tests and ultrasonographic imaging, respectively. The visual analog scale and neck disability index were also used to evaluate CNP patients' clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Deep flexor (mean difference=0.06, 95% CI=0.02-0.11) and extensor muscles size (mean difference=0.07, 95% CI=0.01-0.12) were found to be significantly smaller in CNP patients. CNP patients also demonstrated lower levels of flexor (mean difference=14.68, 95% CI=3.65-25.72) and global extensor endurance capacity. FHP was neither different between the groups nor correlated with any of the dependent variables. Neither FHP nor endurance was correlated with pain/disability. Extensor endurance in both groups and flexor endurance in the asymptomatic group showed significant correlations with muscles size. CONCLUSIONS: FHP was found neither different between groups nor correlated with muscle performance or CNP clinical characteristics. While cervical endurance was found lower in CNP patients, it did not show any association with pain/disability. The muscular size-endurance relationship seems to become more complex in the presence of NP. While deep muscles seem to be differentially affected in the presence of CNP, the alterations do not seem to be uniform in the flexor and extensor groups.


Asunto(s)
Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Músculos del Cuello/fisiología , Dolor de Cuello/fisiopatología , Postura/fisiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cabeza , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Proyectos Piloto
5.
J Oral Rehabil ; 43(5): 321-32, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26732204

RESUMEN

Neck pain is the most common musculoskeletal complaint among computer office workers. There are several reports about the coexistence of neck pain and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, there are no studies investigating this association in the context of work involving computers. The purpose of this study was to verify the association between TMD and neck pain in computer office workers. Fifty-two female computer workers who were divided into two groups: (i) those with self-reported chronic neck pain and disability (WNP) (n = 26) and (ii) those without self-reported neck pain (WONP) (n = 26), and a control group (CG) consisting of 26 women who did not work with computers participated in this study. Clinical assessments were performed to establish a diagnosis of TMD, and craniocervical mechanical pain was assessed using manual palpation and pressure pain threshold (PPT). The results of this study showed that the WNP group had a higher percentage of participants with TMD than the WONP group (42·30% vs. 23·07%, χ(2) = 5·70, P = 0·02). PPTs in all cervical sites were significantly lower in the groups WNP and WONP compared to the CG. Regression analysis revealed TMD, neck pain and work-related factors to be good predictors of disability (R(2) = 0·93, P < 0·001). These results highlighted the importance of considering the work conditions of patients with TMD, as neck disability in computer workers is explained by the association among neck pain, TMD and unfavourable workplace conditions. Consequently, this study attempted to emphasise the importance of considering work activity for minimising neck pain-related disability.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Músculos del Cuello/fisiopatología , Dolor de Cuello/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatología , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/fisiopatología , Lugar de Trabajo , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Computadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Ergonomía , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Conducta Sedentaria , Autoinforme , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/etiología , Interfaz Usuario-Computador
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA