Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol ; 74(1): 41-48, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31420502

RESUMEN

Cleaning validation is the documented evidence that shows the effectiveness of cleaning procedures for the removal of product residues and other contaminants. The cleaning procedures must be validated and methods to determine trace amounts of drugs have to be considered with special attention. An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (UHPLC-UV) method for the determination of mometasone furoate residues on stainless-steel surfaces was developed and validated in order to control a cleaning procedure. The chromatography separation was achieved on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm) at 40°C using acetonitrile and water (1:1, v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The injection volume was 2 µL, and the detection was performed at 254 nm. The swab and rinse procedures were optimized in order to obtain a recovery higher than 90% of mometasone furoate from stainless-steel surfaces, using ethanol as the extraction solvent. The method was validated in the range of 0.2-2.6 µg/mL and showed appropriate selectivity, limit of detection and quantification, linearity, precision, accuracy, and robustness. This method was found to be simple, fast, and sensitive for determination of mometasone furoate residues and, therefore, can be used for cleaning validation analysis.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Furoato de Mometasona/análisis , Acero Inoxidable/análisis , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Rayos Ultravioleta , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Braz. j. pharm. sci ; 52(1): 105-112, Jan.-Mar. 2016. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-789070

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Cleaning validation, a requirement of the current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) for Drugs, consists of documented evidence that cleaning procedures are capable of removing residues to predetermined acceptance levels. This report describes a strategy for the selection of the worst case product for the production of lyophilized reagents (LRs) for labeling with 99mTc from the Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN-CNEN/São Paulo). The strategy is based on the calculation of a "worst case index" that incorporates information about drug solubility, cleaning difficulty, and occupancy rate in the production line. It allowed a reduction in the required number of validations considering the possible manufacturing flow of a given product and the subsequent flow, thus facilitating the process by reducing operation time and cost. The products identified as "worst case" were LRs PUL-TEC and MIBI-TEC.


RESUMO A validação de limpeza é uma exigência dos atuais regulamentos de Boas Práticas de Fabricação de Medicamentos (BPF) e consiste na evidência documentada, que demonstra que os procedimentos de limpeza removem os resíduos em níveis de aceitação pré-determinados. Este estudo apresenta uma estratégia para escolha do produto "pior caso" da linha de produção de reagentes liofilizados para marcação com 99mTc do Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN-CNEN/São Paulo). A estratégia baseia-se no cálculo de um índice denominado "índice para pior caso," que utiliza informações de solubilidade dos fármacos, dificuldade de limpeza dos equipamentos e ocupação dos produtos na linha de produção. A estratégia adotada proporcionou a diminuição no número de validações necessárias, considerando-se as possibilidades de sequências de fabricação de um determinado produto e do produto subsequente, possibilitando a simplificação do processo e redução no tempo e nos custos das atividades envolvidas. Os produtos indicados como pior caso foram os reagentes liofilizados (RL) PUL-TEC e MIBI-TEC.


Asunto(s)
Radiofármacos/análisis , Estudios de Validación como Asunto , Liofilización , Tareas del Hogar/métodos
3.
Rev. cuba. farm ; 47(1): 45-53, ene.-mar. 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-674109

RESUMEN

Introduction: cleaning validation is an integral part of current good manufacturing practices in pharmaceutical industry. The main purpose of cleaning validation is to prove the effectiveness and consistency of cleaning in a given pharmaceutical production equipment to prevent cross contamination and adulteration of drug product with other active ingredient. Objective: a rapid, sensitive and specific reverse phase HPLC method was developed and validated for the quantitative determination of irinotecan hydrochloride in cleaning validation swab samples. Method: the method was validated using waters symmetry shield RP-18 (250mm x 4.6mm) 5 µm column with isocratic mobile phase containing a mixture of 0.02 M potassium di-hydrogen ortho-phosphate, pH adjusted to 3.5 with ortho-phosphoric acid, methanol and acetonitrile (60:20:20 v/v/v). The flow rate of mobile phase was 1.0 mL/min with column temperature of 25°C and detection wavelength at 220nm. The sample injection volume was 100 µl. Results: the calibration curve was linear over a concentration range from 0.024 to 0.143 µg/mL with a correlation coefficient of 0.997. The intra-day and inter-day precision expressed as relative standard deviation were below 3.2%. The recoveries obtained from stainless steel, PCGI, epoxy, glass and decron cloth surfaces were more than 85% and there was no interference from the cotton swab. The detection limit (DL) and quantitation limit (QL) were 0.008 and 0.023 µg ml-1, respectively. Conclusion: the developed method was validated with respect to specificity, linearity, limit of detection and quantification, accuracy, precision and solution stability. The overall procedure can be used as part of a cleaning validation program in pharmaceutical manufacture of irinotecan hydrochloride.

4.
Rev. ciênc. farm. básica apl ; Rev. ciênc. farm. básica apl;33(2)ago. 2012.
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-655400

RESUMEN

Como parte integrante do conjunto de normas das boas práticas de fabricação de medicamentos, a validação de limpeza visa demonstrar a garantia da remoção de resíduos de produtos recém-fabricados, evitando a contaminação cruzada. Neste trabalho, apresenta-se uma estratégia para validação de limpeza de formas farmacêuticas sólidas, manipuladas por granulação úmida. Para tanto, foi escolhido a furosemida, um fármaco de ação diurética, apresentado na forma de comprimidos e produzido pelo Lafepe® (Recife-PE, Brasil). Para análise dos resíduos do fármaco, a coleta das amostras foi realizada por swab e os métodos de quantificação utilizados foram por espectrofotometria e por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência, este último foi desenvolvido e validado pelo Lafepe®. Na detecção de resíduos de produtos de limpeza, a amostragem foi realizada por água de enxágüe, analisando o pH e a condutividade. O limite de aceitação da limpeza do princípio ativo foi de 8,26 miug mL-1 de furosemida no produto subseqüente e do detergente nos equipamentos foi de 10 ppm. Por conseguinte, observou-se que os resíduos dos contaminantes encontrados nos equipamentos após a limpeza foram inferiores aos limites de aceitação admitidos, o que assevera a eficácia e segurança da limpeza realizada na empresa.


As an integral part of the set of good practices in medicine fabrication, the purpose of cleaning validation is to guarantee the removal of remains of newly manufactured products and thus avoid cross-contamination. This article presents an approach to cleaning validation for the compounding of solid pharmaceutical forms by wet granulation. The method is demonstrated for furosemide, a diuretic drug, fabricated in the form of tablets by Lafepe® (Recife, PE, Brazil), in a multipurpose production line. To analyze drug residues left in the equipment after cleaning, samples were collected from surfaces by swab and traces of furosemide were quantitated by spectrophotometry and by a high performance liquid chromatography method developed and validated at the Lafepe® laboratories. To detect residues of detergent used in cleaning, the pH and conductivity of the final rinsing water were measured and compared with those of known dilutions. The acceptance cleaning limit of the active principle was 8.26 miug mL-1 of furosemide in the subsequent product and for the detergent it was 10 ppm in the last rinse of the equipment. The results showed that the residues of contaminants found in the equipment after cleaning were below the acceptable limits, which certifies the effectiveness and security of the cleaning practices in this company.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Medicamentos/prevención & control , Furosemida , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Comprimidos
5.
Rev. cuba. farm ; 46(1): 29-39, ene.-mar. 2012.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-628441

RESUMEN

Objetivo: proponer un procedimiento analítico selectivo para la cuantificación de glibenclamida en muestras de limpieza de equipos farmacéuticos mediante cromatografía líquida de alta resolución. Métodos: la fase móvil consistió en una mezcla equivalente de volúmenes de acetonitrilo y solución amortiguadora KH2PO4 de concentración 0,037 mol/L a pH 5,25 y flujo 1,5 mL/min, en una columna Nucleosil 100 C8. La glibenclamida se inyectó con progesterona como estándar interno y empleando detector UV a una l= 230 nm. Resultados: el método resultó lineal en el intervalo de concentraciones de 0,4-150 mg/mL, teniendo como límites de detección y cuantificación 10 y 40 ng/mL respectivamente y siendo específico al analito en presencia del placebo, sus productos de degradación y a otros ingredientes farmacéuticamente activos. Se consideraron potenciales de interferencias para el método propuesto: captopril, clortalidona, dexametasona, digoxina, 8-cloroteofilina, difenhidramina HCl, fenobarbital, haloperidol, hidroclorotiazida, ácido fumárico, ketotifeno, metoclopramida HCl, piridoxina HCl, piroxicam, prednisona y nifedipino. Se identificaron: ibuprofeno, indometacina, trifluoperazina HCl, tioridazina HCl e imipramina HCl, como interferentes del procedimiento en concentraciones cercanas a 10 mg/mL. Conclusiones: el método desarrollado es sensible, rápido y especialmente selectivo para la evaluación de residuales del principio activo glibenclamida en equipos de producción de tabletas, empleando un muestreo por hisopado, y pudiera utilizarse potencialmente cuando exista sospecha de contaminación cruzada de glibenclamida con otros fármacos de los aquí descritos.


Objective: to submit a selective analytical method for quantization of glibenclamide in cleaning samples of pharmaceutical equipment using high performance liquid chromatography. Methods: the mobile phase consisted of an equal mixing of acetonitrile/phosphate buffer KH2PO4; with 0.037 mol/L concentration pH 5.25 and flow of 1.5 mL/min, in a Nucleosil 100 C8 column. Glibenclamide was injected with progesterone as internal standard and using an UV detector= 230 nm Results: the method was linear in the 0.4-150 mg/mL concentration interval having a detection and quantization limits of 10 and 40 ng/mL respectively. It was specific to analyte when placebo is present, to degradation products and to other active ingredients. Possible interferences with the proposed method was considered for captopril, chlortalidone, dexametasone, diphenhydramin HCl, digoxine, 8-chlortheophylline, diphenhydramina HCl, phenobarbital, haloperidol, hydrochlorothiazide, fumaric acid, ketotifen, metoclopramide HCl, piridoxine HCl, piroxicam, prednisone and nifedipine, On the other hand, ibuprofen, indometacin, trifluoperazine HCl, thioridazine HCl and imipramine were identified as interferences in the procedure at concentration figures close to 10 mg/mL. Conclusions: the present method is sensitive, quick and selective for the evaluation of residues of active pharmaceutical principle glibenclamide in tablet production equipment after a swap sampling and it could be potentially used in case of cross-contamination of glibenclamide and other drugs already described.


Asunto(s)
Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Equipos y Suministros , Contaminación de Equipos , Gliburida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA