The Influence of Adhesive Strategy, Type of Dental Composite, and Polishing Time on Marginal Gap Formation in Class I-like Cavities.

Even after more than six decades of dental composite invention (1962), there is still controversial information about the time in which composite restorations should be polished in order to avoid marginal gap formation at the tooth-composite interface. The aim of the present study was to analyze the influence of adhesive strategy, the type of dental composite, and polishing time on marginal gap formation (%MG) at the tooth-composite interface. Class I-like cavities were hybridized with a universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal) through two strategies: selective enamel etching (SEE) or self-etching mode (SEM). Cavities were filled with two types of dental composites: nanofilled (Z350) or bulk fill (Filtek One Bulk Fill-ONE), and polishing was performed immediately or delayed for 7 days (n = 5). %MG was evaluated by using a 3D laser confocal microscope. As flexural modulus (FM) and degree of conversion (DC%) are determinants of marginal integrity in dental composite restorations, these properties were evaluated for both composites. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). Cavities hybridized following the SEE strategy presented lower %MG (p < 0.05). Z350 showed higher %MG than ONE (p < 0.05). There was no difference in %MG between the polishing times when the SEE strategy was used (p > 0.05). Z350 presented higher FM than ONE (p < 0.05). DC% was found to be not significant (p > 0.05). The results suggest that selective enamel etching (SEE) is a better strategy for producing less %MG in composite restorations with enamel margins irrespective of the time in which the restoration is polished.

Avaliação dos Efeitos da Remoção da Resina Residual e do Polimento na Superfície do Esmalte após Descolagem do Braquete / Evaluation of the Effects of Residual Resin Removal and Polishing on the Enamel Surface after Bracket Debonding

Considerando o uso de brocas para remoção da resina residual após descolagem do braquete e a possibilidade de injúrias à superfície do esmalte após o uso dessas brocas, este trabalho teve como objetivo realizar um estudo experimental, para avaliar a variação do aspecto superficial do esmalte de forma qualitativa, por meio da avaliação com imagens topográficas do esmalte dentário, utilizando-se a Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV), a qual permitiu ilustrar e avaliar a superfície do esmalte após a fase de polimento final, realizada por dois métodos: taça de borracha ou escova Robinson. Foram utilizados 25 dentes pré-molares humanos, obtidos a partir de exodontias em pacientes que procuraram voluntariamente o curso de Residência em Cirurgia da Clínica Odontológica Universitária da Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Os dentes foram divididos em quatro grupos: A, B, C e D, contendo 6 dentes cada, de acordo com as brocas utilizadas para a remoção do remanescente adesivo e o polimento escolhido, além de um dente como "controle". Foi avaliada a rugosidade superficial do esmalte após a remoção da resina e a superfície do esmalte após o polimento com as duas opções apresentadas. Os resultados mostraram que, por observação e inspeção, as brocas removeram a resina residual de todos os dentes, porém, causaram riscos e ranhuras, como evidenciado nas imagens em MEV. Concluiu-se que não houve diferença estatística entre os métodos de polimento e que ambos foram importantes para a redução das marcas abrasivas, proporcionando uma superfície mais lisa do esmalte.

Considering the use of specific burs to remove residual resin after bracket debonding and the possibility of injuries to the dental enamel after using these burs, this study aimed to verify the variation in the enamel surface appearance in a qualitative way and evaluation with topographic images of the dental enamel. The use of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) allowed to illustrate and evaluate the enamel surface after the final polishing phase using two methods: rubber cup or Robinson brush. Twenty-five human premolar teeth were obtained from extractions in patients who voluntarily sought the Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Residency at the Dental School from the State University of Londrina; the teeth were divided into four groups A, B, C and D containing 6 teeth each according to the burs used to remove the remaining adhesive and the chosen polishing, in addition to one tooth as a "control". Dental enamel surface roughness was evaluated after resin removal and enamel surface after polishing with the two methods presented. The results showed that by observation and inspection, the burs removed residual resin from all teeth, however, caused scratches and grooves as evidenced in the SEM images. Based on the results, there was no statistical difference between the polishing methods, and both were important for the reduction of abrasive marks and provided a smoother enamel surface.

Effect of chemical or mechanical finishing/polishing and immersion in staining solutions on the roughness, microhardness, and color stability of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics.

During the manufacture of ceramic restorations there is an important step of finishing and polishing and the effects of different types of these procedures on the surface characteristics of ceramics are not known for sure. AIM: To evaluate the effects of various surface treatments and immersion in coloring substances on the roughness, microhardness, and color stability of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The ceramics used were lithium disilicate reinforced with zirconium dioxide (Suprinity), lithium disilicate (E.max) or leucite (Empress). They were subjected to two surface treatments: glazing (group G) (n=20) or mechanical polishing (group P) (n=20). Then they were divided into two subgroups (n=10) to be treated with the staining substance (coffee or water). Roughness, microhardness and color were measured before and after treatment. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and multiple comparisons were performed with Tukey tests at 5% significance level. RESULTS: Roughness was lower in all tested ceramics after polishing than after glazing. Microhardness was the same for polished and glazed E.max, higher in glazed than polished Empress, and higher in polished than glazed Suprinity. Analysis of the effects of glazing and polishing on the individual ceramics showed that the ΔE2000 and ΔWID data of the E.max ceramic subjected to polishing showed greater change. Mechanical polishing is a good option for surface treatment of monolithic ceramics. CONCLUSION: Glazing was inferior and less satisfactory than polishing. Glazing generates changes that can lead to color instability.

Durante a confecção de restaurações cerâmicas existe uma importante etapa dos procedimentos de acabamento e polimento. Os efeitos de diferentes tipos desses procedimentos nas características superficiais das cerâmicas não são conhecidos com certeza. Objetivo: Avaliar os efeitos de vários tratamentos de superfície e imersão em substâncias corantes na rugosidade, microdureza e estabilidade de cor de cerâmicas monolíticas CAD-CAM. Materiais e Métodos: As cerâmicas utilizadas foram dissilicato de lítio reforçado com dióxido de zircônio (Suprinity), dissilicato de lítio (E.max) ou leucita (Empress). Foram submetidos a dois tratamentos de superfície: glazeamento (grupo G) (n=20) ou polimento mecânico (grupo P) (n=20). Em seguida, foram divididos em dois subgrupos (n=10) para serem tratados com a substância corante (café ou água). Rugosidade, microdureza e cor foram medidas antes e após o tratamento. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e as comparações múltiplas foram realizadas com testes de Tukey ao nível de 5% de significância. Resultados: A rugosidade foi menor em todas as cerâmicas testadas após o polimento do que após o glazeamento. A microdureza foi a mesma para o E.max polido e vidrado, maior no Empress vidrado do que no polido, e maior no Suprinity polido do que no vidrado. A análise dos efeitos do esmaltação e polimento nas cerâmicas individuais mostrou que os dados ΔE2000 e ΔWID da cerâmica E.max submetida ao polimento apresentaram maior alteração. O polimento mecânico é uma boa opção para o tratamento superficial de cerâmicas monolíticas. Conclusão: A aplicação do glazing foi inferior e menos satisfatório que o polimento, gerando alterações que podem levar à instabilidade da cor.

Effect of chemical or mechanical finishing/polishing and immersion in staining solutions on the roughness, microhardness, and color stability of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics / Efeito do acabamento/polimento químico ou mecânico e imersão em soluções manchantes na rugosidade, microdureza e estabilidade da cor em cerâmicas monolíticas CAD-CAM

ABSTRACT During the manufacture of ceramic restorations there is an important step of finishing and polishing and the effects of different types of these procedures on the surface characteristics of ceramics are not known for sure. Aim: To evaluate the effects of various surface treatments and immersion in coloring substances on the roughness, microhardness, and color stability of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics. Materials and Method: The ceramics used were lithium disilicate reinforced with zirconium dioxide (Suprinity), lithium disilicate (E.max) or leucite (Empress). They were subjected to two surface treatments: glazing (group G) (n=20) or mechanical polishing (group P) (n=20). Then they were divided into two subgroups (n=10) to be treated with the staining substance (coffee or water). Roughness, microhardness and color were measured before and after treatment. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and multiple comparisons were performed with Tukey tests at 5% significance level. Results: Roughness was lower in all tested ceramics after polishing than after glazing. Microhardness was the same for polished and glazed E.max, higher in glazed than polished Empress, and higher in polished than glazed Suprinity. Analysis of the effects of glazing and polishing on the individual ceramics showed that the ΔE2000 and ΔWID data of the E.max ceramic subjected to polishing showed greater change. Mechanical polishing is a good option for surface treatment of monolithic ceramics. Conclusion: Glazing was inferior and less satisfactory than polishing. Glazing generates changes that can lead to color instability.

RESUMO Durante a confecção de restaurações cerâmicas existe uma importante etapa dos procedimentos de acabamento e polimento. Os efeitos de diferentes tipos desses procedimentos nas características superficiais das cerâmicas não são conhecidos com certeza. Objetivo: Avaliar os efeitos de vários tratamentos de superfície e imersão em substâncias corantes na rugosidade, microdureza e estabilidade de cor de cerâmicas monolíticas CAD-CAM. Materiais e Métodos: As cerâmicas utilizadas foram dissilicato de lítio reforçado com dióxido de zircônio (Suprinity), dissilicato de lítio (E.max) ou leucita (Empress). Foram submetidos a dois tratamentos de superfície: glazeamento (grupo G) (n=20) ou polimento mecânico (grupo P) (n=20). Em seguida, foram divididos em dois subgrupos (n=10) para serem tratados com a substância corante (café ou água). Rugosidade, microdureza e cor foram medidas antes e após o tratamento. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e as comparações múltiplas foram realizadas com testes de Tukey ao nível de 5% de significância. Resultados: A rugosidade foi menor em todas as cerâmicas testadas após o polimento do que após o glazeamento. A microdureza foi a mesma para o E.max polido e vidrado, maior no Empress vidrado do que no polido, e maior no Suprinity polido do que no vidrado. A análise dos efeitos do esmaltação e polimento nas cerâmicas individuais mostrou que os dados ΔE2000 e ΔWID da cerâmica E.max submetida ao polimento apresentaram maior alteração. O polimento mecânico é uma boa opção para o tratamento superficial de cerâmicas monolíticas. Conclusão: A aplicação do glazing foi inferior e menos satisfatório que o polimento, gerando alterações que podem levar à instabilidade da cor.

Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study.

Aim: The surface roughness of dental restorations can decrease resin durability, since it leads to its deterioration, color variation, and loss of gloss. Therefore, the aim was to assess the surface roughness of nanoparticle resin composites, subjected to two different polishing systems. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal in vitro experimental study consisted of 32 resin specimens made according to ISO 4049-2019 and divided equally into four groups: A1: Palfique LX5 / Sof-Lex, A2: Palfique LX5 / Super Snap, B1: Filtek Z350 XT / Sof-Lex, and B2: Filtek Z350 XT / Super Snap. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Surface roughness was measured with a digital roughness tester, both before and after the polishing procedure. The data were analyzed with the Student's t-test for related samples, and with the inter-subject ANOVA test with two factors; considering significance at P < 0.05. Results: The surface roughness of Palfique LX5 resin with the Sof-lex system was 0.330 (CI: 0.282-0.378 µm) and 0.170 (CI: 0.087-0.253 µm) before and after polishing, respectively. With the Super Snap system, values of 0.448 (CI: 0.346-0.549 µm) and 0.206 (CI: 0.130-0.282 µm) were obtained before and after polishing, respectively. For the Filtek Z350 XT resin, the surface roughness obtained with the Sof-lex system was 0.353 (CI: 0.278-0.427 µm) and 0.134 (CI: 0.095-0.172 µm) before and after polishing, respectively. With the Super Snap system, values of 0.334 (CI: 0.247-0.421 µm) and 0.171 (CI: 0.122-0.221 µm) were obtained before and after polishing, respectively. Surface roughness did not show significant differences in all groups assessed both before (P = 0.068) and after (P = 0.335) polishing. However, before and after the application of the polishing systems, all groups significantly decreased their surface roughness (P < 0.05). Further, when comparing this decrease among all groups, no significant differences were observed (P = 0.437). Conclusion: The surface roughness of the Filtek Z350 XT and Palfique LX5 nanoparticle resin composites showed no significant differences when using the Sof-lex and Super Snap polishing systems. However, both polishing systems significantly decreased the surface roughness of the nanoparticulated resins, with this decrease being similar in all groups.

In Vitro Color Stability Evaluation of Three Polished and Unpolished Nanohybrid Resin Composites Immersed in a 0.12% Chlorhexidine-Based Mouthwash at Different Times.

The use of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes on resin composites with rough surfaces can cause discoloration which compromises the esthetic of patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the in vitro color stability of Forma (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan), Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and Filtek Z350XT (3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) resin composites, with and without polishing, after being immersed in a 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX)-based mouthwash at different times. The present in vitro experimental and longitudinal study used 96 nanohybrid resin composite blocks (Forma, Tetric N-Ceram and Filtek Z350XT) 8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, evenly distributed. Each resin composite group was divided into two subgroups (n = 16) with and without polishing and then immersed in a 0.12% CHX-based mouthwash for 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. Color measurements were performed with a calibrated digital spectrophotometer. Nonparametric tests were used to compare independent (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis) and related (Friedman) measures. In addition, the Bonferroni post hoc correction was used considering a significance level of p < 0.05. All polished and unpolished resin composites presented color variation < 3.3 when immersed for up to 14 days in 0.12% CHX-based mouthwash. The polished resin composite with the lowest color variation (ΔE) values over time was Forma, and the one with the highest values was Tetric N-Ceram. When comparing the color variation (ΔE) over time, it was observed that the three resin composites, with and without polishing, presented a significant change (p < 0.001), although these changes in color variation (ΔE) were evident from 14 days between each color acquisition (p < 0.05). The unpolished Forma and Filtek Z350XT resin composites showed significantly more color variation than the same polished ones at all times when immersed in a 0.12% CHX-based mouthwash for 30 s daily. In addition, every 14 days, all three resin composites with and without polishing showed a significant color change, while, every 7 days, color stability was maintained. All the resin composites showed clinically acceptable color stability when exposed for up to 14 days to the above-mentioned mouthwash.

Estabilidad de Color de Tres Resinas Nanohíbridas en Relación al Tipo Pulido Realizado

El color de las restauraciones se considera una de las características más exigidas por los pacientes, cuyo éxito final dependerá de mantenerse en el tiempo, sin sufrir alteraciones. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la estabilidad de color que experimentan las resinas al ser sumergidas en una sustancia pigmentante en función al factor tiempo y al tipo de pulido final realizado. Estudio experimental in vitro de tres resinas de nanopartículas: Filtek Z-350 XT® (3M), Brillant NG® (Coltene), Tetric N-Ceram® (Vivadent) donde se comparó la estabilidad de color al ser sumergidas en café. Se confeccionaron 120 discos de resinas (color esmalte A3) divididos posteriormente en dos grupos: Grupo 1 protocolo habitual de pulido Grupo 2: protocolo habitual más sellador fotocurable Biscover® (Bisco). Las muestras fueron almacenadas en agua destilada en estufa a 37° durante 24 hs para su hidratación. Se registró el color utilizando el colorímetro Kónica Minolta®. Posteriormente se sumergieron las muestras en café, y se tomó nuevamente el color a las 24 hs y a los 7 días. Los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente mediante análisis de varianza y test de compación de Tukey. Se observó que la resina que más se pigmentó en el grupo 1 correspondió a la resina Filteck Z-350 con DE: 4,68 a las 24 hs y DE: 5,53 a los 7 días. Al analizar el grupo 2 las tres resinas se mantuvieron en valores bajos de DE: 0,96 a 1,42 en ambos períodos. Al sumergir las resinas en una sustancia pigmentante, la alteración del color se va produciendo en función del tiempo. Sin embargo, el uso complementario de un sellador fotocurable como pulido mejora significativamente la estabilidad de color en estos materiales, factores que el clínico debe tener en cuenta para lograr el éxito de sus restauraciones.

The color of the restorations is considered one of the characteristics most demanded by patients, whose final success will depend on being maintained over time, without undergoing alterations. The objective of this study was to determine the color variations experienced by reinforced resins when immersed in a pigmenting substance as a function of the time factor and the type of final polishing performed. In vitro experimental study of three nanoparticle resins: Filtek Z-350 XT® (3M), Brillant NG® (Coltene), Tetric N-Ceram® (Vivadent) where color stability was compared when immersed in coffee. 120 Discs of resins (enamel color A3) were made and subsequently divided into two groups: Group 1 usual polishing protocol Group 2: usual protocol plus Biscover® (Bisco) light-curing sealer. The samples were stored in distilled water in an oven at 37 ° for 24 hours for hydration. Color was recorded using the Konica Minolta® colorimeter. Subsequently, the samples were immersed in coffee, and the color was taken again at 24 hours and 7 days. Data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's comparison test. It was observed that the most pigmented resin in group 1 corresponded to the Filteck Z-350 resin with DE: 4.68 at 24 hours and DE: 5.53 at 7 days. When analyzing group 2, the three resins maintained low DE values: 0.96 to 1.42 in both periods. By immersing the resins in a pigmenting substance, the change in color occurs over time. However, the complementary use of a light-curing sealer such as polishing significantly improves color stability in these materials, factors that the clinician must take into account to achieve the success of their restorations.

Surface smoothness of resin composites after polishing-A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to provide evidence for the best polishing protocol for different types of resin composites to minimize surface roughness. A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on July 2, 2019 (updated in December, 2020). In vitro studies that included at least two systems for polishing resin composites and analyzed surface roughness were included. The risk of bias was evaluated. A random-effects Bayesian-mixed treatment comparison model was used to compare surface roughness in resin composites with the different types of polishers. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was performed to rank the probability for the best polishing system. After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening yielded 34 studies. Network meta-analysis was not possible for hybrid and microhybrid composites. SUCRA analysis showed that abrasive paper discs allowed greater surface smoothness for nanohybrid and nanofill composites to a probability of between 83% and 91.6%. Silicon carbide brush had a 78.2% probability of being the best system for microfill composites. The use of abrasive paper disc polishers showed a favorable result in nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Silicon carbide brush has a greater chance of promoting a smoother surface for microfill resin composites.

Sistemas de pulido para restauraciones cerámicas. Revisión de la literatura / Polishing systems for ceramic restorations. Literature review

El pulido es un paso de suma importancia en el flujo de trabajo de las restauraciones cerámicas, después de realizado un ajuste con puntas o piedras diamantadas, ya que disminuye la rugosidad de las superficies tratadas. Esto repercute positivamente en las propiedades mecánicas y ópticas del material. Sin embargo, la poca literatura disponible acerca de este procedimiento hace que sea pasado por alto. Debido a esto, el presente articulo tuvo como objetivo realizar una revisión bibliográfica sobre los diferentes protocolos de pulido para las diversas restauraciones cerámicas de mayor uso: Feldespática, disilicato de litio y zirconia en sus diferentes presentaciones. Se describen aspectos relevantes sobre el pulido mecánico, la rugosidad superficial y los sistemas de pulido actuales para cerámicas.

Polishing is an extremely important step in the workflow of ceramic restorations, after adjustment with diamond burs or stones, as it reduces the roughness of the treated surfaces. This has a positive impact on the mechanical and optical properties of the material; however, the limited literature available about this procedure makes it to be overlooked. Therefore, the aim of this article was to review the literature on the different polishing protocols for the most used ceramic restorations: Feldspathic, lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramics. Relevant aspects on mechanical polishing, surface roughness and current polishing systems for ceramics are described.

Evaluation of different composite resin finishing and polishing protocols by confocal laser scan microscopy

Aim This study aimed to analyze the influence of finishing and polishing (F/P) protocols on resin surface through roughness (Ra) values and laser scan microscopy observations. Methods Forty-eight (n=48) resin specimens were sorted into four groups (n=12), according to the type of resin used: Filtek Z250 (Z250), Filtek Z350 (Z350), Filtek One Bulk Fill (BF), Filtek P60 (P60). The specimens were sorted into six groups according to the type of F/P system used (n=2/group): Control group, Diamond bur (KG Sorensen), Soflex Pop-On Discs (3M ESPE), Soflex Spiral (3M ESPE), Dura Gloss (American Burs), and Praxis (TDV). Results The highest roughness values (Ra) were attributed to BF group for all F/P systems, except for the Soft-Lex PopOn discs. The Soft-Lex PopOn, Spiral, and Praxis discs presented a better performance for the surface treatment of the tested composite resins. Regardless of the restorative material, the use of diamond bur or single-step abrasive rubber (Dura Gloss) were associated with the highest Ra values. Conclusion The effect of F/P systems on Ra is material-dependent and instrument or system-dependent.

The Microhardness and Surface Roughness Assessment of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Treated with and without the Application of an Oxygen-Inhibited Layer and a Polishing System: An In Vitro Study.

The aim of this study was to assess the microhardness and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites treated with and without the application of an oxygen-inhibited layer (OIL) and a polishing system. This in vitro experimental study consisted of 72 resin composite blocks divided into three groups: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Opus Bulk Fill APS, and Filtek Bulk Fill. Each resin composite group was further divided into two subgroups: with and without OIL control. Subsequently, surface roughness and microhardness were measured before and after polishing. A t-test was used to compare independent and related measures. For the intergroup comparison of variation before and after polishing, the Kruskal−Wallis test with Bonferroni post hoc was used considering a significance level of p < 0.05. When comparing surface roughness, significant differences were observed between Opus Bulk Fill resin composite with and without OIL control (p = 0.003) before polishing. The same occurred when comparing Tetric N-Ceram resin composite with and without OIL control (p = 0.039) after polishing. In addition, the surface roughness of Filtek Bulk Fill, Opus Bulk Fill, and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin composites, with and without OIL control, decreased significantly after polishing (p < 0.001), while surface microhardness significantly increased (p < 0.05), with the exception of Opus Bulk Fill resin with OIL control (p = 0.413). In conclusion, OIL control and polishing significantly improved the surface roughness and surface microhardness of Filtek Bulk Fill and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin composites. However, in the case of Opus Bulk Fill resin composite, only its surface roughness was significantly improved.

Knowledge and practice of dentists in processing polishing points: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Adequately processing polishing points used to polish composite resin restorations is necessary for microbiological control in dentistry, but there is no specific protocol to guide professionals. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of dentists in processing these instruments. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included the application of an online questionnaire via Google Forms and social media promotion. The study evaluated the association of field of activity, time since graduation, age, and sex of professionals with processing practice. The statistical analysis was performed with absolute and relative frequencies and logistic and Poisson regressions at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Overall, 473 questionnaires were analyzed. A rate of 51% of professionals reported using inadequate processing methods, and almost 68% claimed to have good knowledge of the topic. Both regression analyses were significantly associated, showing a direct effect of age and time since graduation on adequate processing practices. CONCLUSIONS: Although most professionals reported understanding the processing of polishing points, they do not perform it most adequately. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: An expressive number of dentists process polishing points improperly. The topic is significant for representing a semi-critical instrument extensively used in esthetic restorations.

Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that dental restorations with rough surfaces can have several disadvantages such as pigment retention or plaque accumulation, which can facilitate caries formation, color variation, loss of brightness, degradation of restoration, among others. The present study aimed to assess surface roughness in bulk fill and conventional nanohybrid resins with and without polishing, controlling the oxygen inhibited layer. METHODS: This in vitro and longitudinal experimental study consisted of 120 resin blocks of 6 mm diameter and 4 mm depth, divided into two groups: Bulk Fill (Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk-fill, Opus Bulk Fill APS, Filtek™ Bulk Fill) and conventional nanohybrid (Tetric® N-Ceram, Opallis EA2, Filtek™ Z250 XT). Each resin group was divided into two equal parts, placing glycerin only on one of them, in order to control the oxygen inhibited layer. Subsequently, the surface roughness was measured before and after the polishing procedure with Sof-Lex discs. The data were analyzed with the T-test for related measures, and for comparison between groups before and after polishing, the non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test with the Bonferroni post hoc was used, considering a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Before polishing, the resin composites with the lowest surface roughness were Opus Bulk Fill APS (0.383 ± 0.186 µm) and Opallis EA2 (0.430 ± 0. 177 µm) with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, respectively; while after polishing, those with the lowest surface roughness were Opus Bulk Fill APS (0.213 ± 0.214 µm) and Tetric N-Ceram (0.097 ± 0.099 µm), with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, respectively. Furthermore, before and after polishing, all resins significantly decreased their surface roughness (p < 0.05) except Opus Bulk Fill APS resin with oxygen inhibited layer control (p = 0.125). However, when comparing this decrease among all groups, no significant differences were observed (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Opus Bulk Fill APS resin with oxygen inhibited layer control presented lower surface roughness both before and after polishing, being these values similar at both times. However, after polishing the other bulk fill and conventional nanohybrid resins with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, the surface roughness decreased significantly in all groups, being this decrease similar in all of them.

Análise das propriedades físicas e cromáticas de materiais restauradores a base de cerâmica em função de diferentes protocolos de acabamento/polimento e envelhecimento / Analysis of the physical and chromatic properties of ceramic-based restorative materials as a function of different finishing/polishing and aging protocols

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência de diferentes protocolos de ajuste e acabamento intraorais em diferentes materiais restauradoress indiretos a base de cerâmica: dissilicato de lítio, resina nanocerâmica e zircônia após o envelhecimento na sua rugosidade, microscopia eletrônica de varredura, resistência flexural e estabilidade de cor. Para a análise mecânica, 480 espécimes de tamanho 16 x 3 x 1 mm foram envelhecidos por termociclagem (18000 ciclos). E cortes de 5 x 3 x 1 mm para obtenção de espécimes para a análise de estabilidade de cor (n = 600) envelhecidos por imersão em solução de café. Os protocolos analisados foram: Desgaste com ponta diamantada em alta rotação com/sem refrigeração, seguido ou não de polimento; desgaste com ponta diamantada em contra-ângulo multiplicador 1:5 com/sem refrigeração, seguido ou não de polimento; grupo controle sem nenhum tratamento de superfície, seguido ou não de polimento ou glaze. As superfícies foram analisadas por meio da rugosidade (n=5) antes e após envelhecimento. Após a termociclagem, os espécimes foram submetidos ao teste de flexão em EMIC com velocidade de 0,5 mm / min até a fratura. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste ANOVA a três critérios seguida pelo teste de Tukey, considerando o nível de significância de 5%. A avaliação da estabilidade de cor, os espécimes foram imersos em solução de café por 28 dias e comparado com a mesma amostra antes da imersão, por meio da análise de espectofotometria em 2 períodos (inicialmente (T0) e pós 28 dias (T1)), e avaliado de acordo com o sistema CIE L*a*b*. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste ANOVA a dois critérios seguida pelo teste de Tukey, considerando o nível de significância de 5%. A análise de rugosidade mostrou diferença significante em relação aos diferentes materiais avaliados (p < 0.0001) e quanto as diferentes superfícies (p < 0.0001), enquanto o envelhecimento não mostrou diferenças (p = 0.8458); no grupo glaze não houve diferença estatística. Para força máxima, o envelhecimento por termociclagem, as superfícies e o material não influenciaram os resultados estatisticamente. Na análise de cor houve diferença estatística independente do material (p < 0.001), superfície (p = 0.001) e na interação dos fatores(AU)

The aimof this work was to evaluate the influence of different intraoral adjustment and finishing protocols on different indirect ceramic-based restored materials: lithium disilicate, nanoceramic resin and zirconia after aging on its roughness, scanning electron microscopy, flexural strength and stability. by heart. For mechanical analysis, 480 specimens of size 16 x 3 x 1 mm were aged by thermocycling (18000 cycles). And cuts in 5 x 3 x 1 mm to obtain specimens for the analysis of color stability (n = 600) aged by immersion in coffee solution. The protocols analyzed were: High speed diamond grinding with/without cooling, followed or not by polishing; wear with diamond point in contra-angle multiplier 5:1 with/without coolant, followed or not by polishing; control group without any surface treatment, followed or not by polishing or glaze. The surfaces were analyzed by roughness (n=5) before and after aging. After thermocycling, the specimens were subjected to the bending test in EMIC with a velocity of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's test, considering a significance level of 5%. To evaluate the color stability, the specimens were immersed in coffee solution for 28 days and compared with the same sample before immersion, through spectrophotometry analysis in 2 periods (initially (T0) and after 28 days (T1)) , and evaluated according to the CIE L*a*b* system. Data were submitted to a two-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's test, considering a significance level of 5%. The roughness analysis showed a significant difference in relation to the different materials evaluated (p < 0.0001) and for the different surfaces (p < 0.0001), while aging showed no differences (p = 0.8458); in the glaze group there was no statistical difference. For maximum strength, thermocycling aging, surfaces and material did not influence the results statistically. In the color analysis, there was a statistical difference independent of the material (p < 0.001), surface (p = 0.001) and in the interaction of factors(AU)

Influence of Finishing/Polishing in Surface Roughness of Conventional Nanocomposites and Bulk-Fill / Influência do Acabamento/Polimento na Rugosidade de Superfície das Resinas Compostas Nanoparticuladas Convencional e Bulk-Fill

The choice of the best finishing/polishing methods for composite resin restorations is critical to the choice of excellence results related to longer clinical longevity. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of a Nanoparticulate and Bulk-fill resin. For the research, 40 sample disks were prepared for each composite: single-increment (BF) (Bulk Fill 3M), both 2 mm thick and 10 mm in diameter (FZ) (Filtek Z350, 3M). The specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups with 10 samples each, according to the different materials to which they were subjected to the finishing and polishing protocols: control [C]- diamond tip (FG 4137F FAVA); [EN] polishing discs (Enhance, Dentsply); [SL] Abrasive discs (Sof-Lex Pop-on, 3M) and [PD] felt disc + Polishing paste (Diamond Excel, FGM). A surface roughness (Ra) was verified with a roughness meter in three different data volumes and calculated as arithmetic means. Data were statistically treated by one way ANOVA followed by test t and student t test. Regardless of the data tested, evidence of the systemic controlling against different systems for polishing control with control (p <0.05). PD presented statistically greater roughness to the EN and SL (p <0.001), these in turn obtained similar performance and presented the lowest values of roughness for both composites (p> 0.05). The different finishing / polishing methods influenced the surface roughness of both composites, observing for Sof-lex and Enhance lower Ra values. (AU)

A escolha dos adequados métodos de acabamento/polimento para restaurações de resina composta é fundamental para obtenção de resultados de excelência, relacionados a maior longevidade clínica. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a influência dos sistemas de acabamento e polimento na rugosidade de superfície das resinas nanoparticuladas convencional e bulk-fill. Para a pesquisa foram confeccionados 40 discos de amostra para cada compósito: Convencional [FZ] (Filtek Z350, 3M) e de incremento único [BF] (Filtek Bulk Fill, 3M), ambas com 2 mm de espessura e 10 mm de diâmetro. Foram divididos aleatoriamente em 4 grupos com 10 amostras cada, de acordo com os diferentes protocolos que receberam, sendo: controle (C) ponta diamantada (FG 4137F, FAVA); (EN) discos de silicone (Enhance, Dentsply); (SL) discos abrasivos (Sof-Lex Pop-on, 3M); (PD) Feltro + Pasta diamantada (Diamond Excel, FGM). A rugosidade de superfície (Ra) foi verificada com um rugosímetro em três leituras de diferentes direções e calculadas as médias aritméticas. Os dados foram tratados estatisticamente pelos testes ANOVA 1 fator seguido pelo teste t e t de student (p<0,05). Independente da resina testada, evidenciou-se diminuição da rugosidade pelos diferentes sistemas de polimento frente ao grupo controle (p<0,05). PD apresentou rugosidade estatisticamente maior à EN e SL (p<0,001), estes últimos que por sua vez obtiveram desempenho semelhante e apresentaram os menores valores de rugosidade para ambos os compósitos (p>0,05). Os diferentes métodos de acabamento/polimento influenciaram na rugosidade de superfície dos dois compósitos testados, observando para Sof-lex e Enhance menores valores de Ra. (AU)

Effect of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Nano-Hybrid and Nano-Filling Composite Resins: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The polishing of surface roughness is an important characteristic of composite resins and is directly related to the longevity of the restoration and patient comfort. Different polishing systems utilize different protocols, as reported in the literature. This systematic review (SR) aimed to synthesize and analyze the available scientific evidence about the effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid and nano-filling composite resins. METHODS: The study protocol of this SR was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews -PROSPERO- (CRD4201705653). A search was conducted in PubMed-Medline, Scopus, LILACS, EMBASE, for the period 2007-2020. Quality appraisal and a descriptive analysis of the papers that met the inclusion criteria were conducted. RESULTS: 18 records were included. Seven polishing systems (PS) of one step were found, seven PS of two steps, eight PS of three steps, three PS of four steps, and four PS of five steps. Polishing protocols (PP) varied, with application times ranging from 10 s to 60 s with speeds between 10,000 and 30,000 RPM. Regarding composition, the aluminum oxide was one of the most important components used to achieve a smooth surface. CONCLUSIONS: Multistep polishing systems were the most effective (i.e., Astropol and Sof-Lex Discs).

Efeito do acabamento e polimento sobre a topografia superficial de uma resina composta convencional e uma bulk fill / Effect of finishing and polishing on the surface topography of a conventional compound resin and a bulk fill / Efecto de acabado y pulido en la topografía superficial de una resina compuesta convencional y un llenado a granel

Introdução:As atuaisresinas Bulk-Fill apresentamcomovantagens e propriedades: menor tempo clínico, baixa contração de polimerização, maior translucidez, entre outros. Objetivo:Avaliar a topografia superficial de restaurações com diferentes tipos de resina composta antes e após submetê-las a diferentes sistemas de acabamento e polimento. Metodologia:Confecção de100 corpos de prova, sendo 50 de cada composto resinoso, apresentando cinco grupos (n=10) sorteados de forma aleatória, de acordo com o sistema de acabamento e polimento empregado. Foram utilizadas as resinas Filtek Z350 XT e a Bulk Fill Filtek One Bulk Fill e os sistemas de acabamento e polimento: Discos de Lixa Sof-Lex Pop On Kit;Discos Diamantado Espiral Sof-Lex; Ponta Enhance e Broca Carbide Multilaminada nº 0283F, que foram comparados com superfície deixada pela Tira de Poliester (Controle Negativo). Após 7 dias de armazenamento em água destilada, os corpos de provaforam submetidos aoMicroscópio Eletrônico de Varredura.Resultados:Os corpos de provada resina Bulk Fill tiveram como melhor resultado o sistema de acabamento e polimentocom broca carbidee resultado não satisfatório com discodiamantado espiral Sof-lex, enquanto a ponta Enhance e lixa Sof-lex Pop Ontiveram resultados semelhantes. Os corpos de prova da resina Filtek Z350 XT tiveram melhor aspecto visual de lisura no grupo controle negativoe pior resultado no grupo com disco diamantado espiral Sof-lex. Conclusões:Dessa forma, o sistema que apresentou melhor resultado foi a broca Carbidena resina Bulk Fill, enquanto a Filtek Z350 XT apresentou-se melhor no grupo controle. Porém, ainda são necessáriosestudos para se chegar em um protocolo de acabamento e polimento mais eficiente (AU).

Introduction:The current Bulk-Fill resins have the following advantages and properties: less clinical time, low polymerization shrinkage, greater translucency, among others.Objective:Toevaluate the topography of restorations with different types of composite resin before and after submitting them to different finishing and polishing systems.Methodology:Manufacture of 100 specimens, 50 of each resin compound, presenting five groups (n = 10) drawn at random, according to the finishing and polishing system employed. Filtek Z350 XT resins and Bulk Fill Filtek One Bulk Fill andfinishing and polishing systems were used: Sof-Lex Pop On Kit Sanding Discs; Diamond Spiral Sof-Lex Discs; Tip Enhance and Multilaminated Carbide Drill nº 0283F, which were compared with the surface left by the Polyester Strip (Negative Control). After 7 days of storage in distilled water, the specimens were submitted to a Scanning Electron Microscope.Results:The Bulk Fill resin specimens had the best result of the finishing and polishing system with carbide drill and unsatisfactory result with Sof-lex spiral diamond disc, while the Enhance tip and Sof-lex Pop On sandpaper had similar results. The Filtek Z350 XT resin specimens had a better visual aspect of smoothness in the negative control group and a worse result in the group with Sof-lex spiral diamond wheel.Conclusions:Thus, the system that showed the best result was the Carbide drill in Bulk Fill resin, while Filtek Z350 XT was better in the control group. However, studies are still needed to arrive at a more efficient finishing and polishing protocol (AU).

Introducción:Las actuales resinas Bulk-Fill tienen las siguientes ventajas y propiedades: menor tiempo clínico, baja contracción de polimerización, mayor translucidez, entre otras.Objetivo: Evaluar la topografía de restauraciones con diferentes tipos de resina compuesta antes y después de someterlas a diferentes sistemas de acabado y pulido.Metodología: Fabricación de 100 probetas, 50 de cada resina compuesta, presentando cinco grupos (n = 10) extraídos al azar, según el sistema de acabado y pulido empleado. Se utilizaron resinas Filtek Z350 XT y Bulk Fill Filtek One Bulk Fill y sistemas de acabado y pulido: Discos de lijado Sof-Lex Pop On Kit; Discos Sof-Lex en espiral de diamante; Broca Realce de Punta y Carburo Multilaminado nº 0283F, que fueron comparadas con la superficie dejada por la Tira de Poliéster (Control Negativo). Después de 7 días de almacenamiento en agua destilada, lasmuestras se sometieron a un Las muestras de resina Bulk Fill tuvieron el mejor resultado del sistema de acabado y pulido con broca de carburo y un resultado insatisfactorio con el disco de diamante en espiral Sof-lex, mientras que la punta Enhance y el papel de lija Sof-lex Pop On tuvieron resultados similares. Las muestras de resina Filtek Z350 XT tuvieron un mejor aspecto visual de suavidad en el grupo de control negativo y un peor resultado en el grupo con disco de diamante en espiral Sof-lex.Conclusiones: Así, el sistema que mejor resultado mostró fue la broca Carbide en resina Bulk Fill, mientras que Filtek Z350 XT fue mejor en el grupo control. Sin embargo, aún se necesitan estudios para llegar a un protocolo de acabado y pulido más eficiente (AU).

In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this randomized in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of carbide, fibreglass and polymer burs on resinous remnant removal after bracket debonding, by the evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology. The secondary objective was to compare the time dispended on the procedures. METHODS: The buccal surfaces of 28 bovine incisors were analysed by a profilometer to initial roughness measurement (Ra-T1). Brackets were bonded with a light-cured resin and debonded with a debonding plier. The samples were randomly divided into four groups, according to the bur used (n=7): A-Tungsten carbide; B-Fibreglass; C-Polymer; D-Polymer with 75% ethanol pre-treatment. The second roughness measurements were made after resin removal (Ra-T2). Time for removal procedures was also recorded. The third measurements were made after polishing (Ra-T3). Scanning Electronic Microscopy was performed in two samples of each group: after resin removal and after polishing. Results of roughness and time measurements were statically analysed by analysis of variance with post-hoc Bonferroni. RESULTS: After polishing, tungsten carbide (P=0.1555) and fibreglass burs provided final surface roughness statistically similar to the baseline condition (P=1.0000). Yet, polymer burs, associated (P<0.0001) or not to alcohol (P<0.0001), provided surface roughness significantly higher when compared to baseline values. Polymer burs were more time-consuming on resinous remnant removal than tungsten carbide and fibreglass burs (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Polymer burs were less effective and more time-consuming to remove the remaining resin than tungsten carbide and fibreglass burs. The polishing step created smoother surfaces regardless of the burs used for resin removal.

Avaliação da rugosidade superficial de uma resina composta com uso de diferentes polidores / Evaluation of the surface roughness of a composite resin using different polishers

Introdução: A rugosidade superficial é definida pela superfície de um material restaurador após as etapas de acabamento e polimento, e é afetada pelas propriedades do compósito resinoso, bem como pelos instrumentos utilizados para a realização do polimento. Objetivos: Avaliar a rugosidade superficial de uma resina composta nano-híbrida polida com diferentes sistemas de polimento por Microscopia de Força Atômica (MFA) e análise dos polidores por Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV). Materiais e métodos: Os fatores em estudo são os sistemas de polimento em três níveis: Enhance (Dentsply), Ultra-Gloss (American Burrs) e Dura-Gloss (American Burrs). As unidades experimentais são formadas por 30 corpos de prova em resina composta convencional nano-híbrida, divididos aleatoriamente em 3 grupos (n=10). O Grupo G1 recebeu tratamento com o sistema de polimento de uma única etapa: Dura-Gloss; o Grupo G2, sistema de polimento de múltiplas etapas: Ultra-Gloss; e o Grupo G3 recebeu o tratamento com o sistema de polimento de uma única etapa: Enhance. A variável de resposta quantitativa se dá pela rugosidade superficial avaliada pela Microscopia de Força Atômica (MFA). Resultados: Os resultados obtidos demonstram que os sistemas de polidores Dura-Gloss e Ultra-Gloss apresentaram rugosidade superficial similar entre si (p=0,201) e diferiram estatisticamente do sistema Enhance (p=0,023, Ultra-Gloss e p=0,000, DuraGloss), o qual apresentou maior rugosidade superficial para a resina composta nano-híbrida. Conclusão: Os polidores Dura-Gloss e Ultra-Gloss tem maior capacidade de polimento da resina composta nano-hibrida(AU)

Introduction: The surface roughness is defined by the surface of a restorative material after the finishing and polishing steps, and is affected by the properties of the resinous composite as well as by the instruments used to perform the polishing. Objectives: To evaluate the surface roughness of a polished nano-hybrid composite resin with different polishing systems by atomic force microscopy (MFA) and polishing analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: the factors under study are polishing systems at three levels: Enhance (Dentsply), Ultra-Gloss (American Burrs) and Dura-Gloss (American Burrs). The experimental units are composed of 30 specimens in conventional nano-hybrid composite resin, divided randomly into 3 groups (n = 10). The G1 Group received treatment with the single-stage polishing system: Dura-Gloss, Group G2, multi-step polishing system: UltraGloss and Group G3 was treated with the single-stage polishing system: Enhance. The quantitative response variable is given by the surface roughness evaluated by atomic force microscopy (MFA). Results: the results showed that the systems of Dura-Gloss and UltraGloss polishers presented similar surface roughness (p = 0.201) and differed statistically from the Enhance system (p = 0.023, Ultra-Gloss and p = 0.000, Dura- Gloss), which presented higher surface roughness for the nano-hybrid composite resin. Conclusion: Dura-Gloss and Ultra-Gloss polishers have a higher polishing capacity of nano-hybrid composite resin(AU)

Impact of additional polishing method on physical, micromorphological, and microtopographical properties of conventional composites and bulk fill.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), depth distribution of the charge particles (DDCP), mapping of chemical elements, 3D microtopography (3DM), and the micromorphology of the composites (MOR) of conventional and bulk fill after additional polishing. The specimens were prepared from Filtek Bulk Fill (FBF), Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCBF), Opus Bulk Fill (OBF), X-tra Fil (XTFL), Filtek Z250 XT (XT), Grandioso (GRA), Tetric N-Ceram (TNC), Vittra APS (VT), according to three additional techniques (n = 10): without finishing and polishing, finishing and polishing with abrasive rubbers (Astropol), finishing and polishing with Astropol plus additional polishing with silicon carbide brush. The SR and CA were measured using a profilometer and adapted goniometer, respectively; 3DM used atomic force microscopy (AFM); the micromorphology and DDCP by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the MOR by means of X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy (EDS). The SR and CA were analyzed by ANOVA-two factors and Tukey test (p < .05); the others data were analyzed descriptively. The DDCP of all the resins had an organic matrix rich surface layer and a particulate rich subsurface layer of smaller dimensions. Additional polishing: reduced SR of FBF, VT, TNCBF, and XTFL resins; increased the CA value of the XTFL and decreased of XT. In the analyzes for 3DM, smoother and more uniform surfaces were observed in all a resins. The elements: carbon (predominant), oxygen, silicon, zirconia, and aluminum were present in all composite resins. Therefore, additional polishing improved the surface properties of the resins studied.