Mastering the Best Practices: A Comprehensive Look at the European Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

The successful outcome of a cardiac surgery procedure is significantly dependent on the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Even if a cardiac operation is technically well-conducted, a patient may suffer CPB-related complications that could result in severe comorbidities, reduced quality of life, or even death. However, the role of clinical perfusionists in perioperative patient care, which is critical, is often overlooked. Therefore, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA), and the European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) have agreed to develop joint clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for CPB due to its significant impact on patient care and significant variations in practice patterns between countries. The European guidelines, based on the EACTS standardized framework for the development of CPGs, cover the entire spectrum of CPB management in adult cardiac surgery. This includes training and education of clinical perfusionists, machine hardware, disposables, preparation for initiation of CPB, a complete set of procedures during CPB to help maintain end-organ function and anticoagulation, weaning from CPB, and the gaps in evidence and future research directions. This comprehensive coverage ensures that all aspects of CPB management are addressed, providing clinicians with a standardized approach to CPB management based on the latest evidence and best practices. To ensure better integration of these evidence-based recommendations into daily practice, this review aims to provide a general understanding of guideline development and an overview of essential treatment recommendations for CPB management.

A Clinical Audit on the Indications for Intervention With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Over Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients in Mohammed Bin Khalifa Bin Salman Al Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Centre.

Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a novel treatment strategy used to treat patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. It utilizes a percutaneous approach and is preferred over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at high surgical risk. The aim of this study was to audit the indications of the intervention with TAVI over SAVR in Bahrain Defence Force Hospital, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Bin Sulman AlKhalifa Cardiac Centre (BDF-MKCC), as well as note the outcomes of patients who underwent TAVI. Methods The indications for allocating aortic stenosis patients to TAVI over SAVR in BDF-MKCC were studied with regard to the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines published in 2017. Data from 82 patients, which accounts for all patients who underwent TAVI, were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records and the percentage of compliance was calculated and analyzed. Results The compliance percentages of the 23 parameters for the intervention with TAVI that have been set by the ESC/EACTS are calculated, where BDF-MKCC were fully adherent to 12 out of the 23 standards. Moreover, the total number of patients that are compliant with all standards is 13 out of 82 (15.85%) compliant patients. Conclusion The centre showed non-compliance to many of the published standards. Hence, we created a checklist to ensure that the international guidelines are followed. We are looking forward to re-audit this aspect in the near future, to make certain that changes were done. We would also like to do a comparative study to compare the patients' outcomes before and after implementing the 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines. Furthermore, we call for further studies to be conducted in this field and that is to evaluate the standards themselves as well as the safety of TAVI in those who are not eligible for it according to the ESC/EACTS.

IACTS position statement on "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization": section 7.1-a consensus document.

American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA) and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) recently released the Clinical Practice Guidelines for myocardial revascularization [1]. The guidelines were the felt need of the fraternity and this single all-encompassing document, relegating the previous six guidelines on the subject to archives, is indeed welcome. However, the downgrading of coronary artery bypass surgery for stable multivessel coronary artery disease and its bracketing with percutaneous coronary interventions has caused a lot of anguish in the surgical fraternity. This document presents the official viewpoint of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons on the matter.

Analysis of the ESC/EACTS 2020 Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines With Perioperative Implications.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, with an individual lifetime risk of approximately 37% in the United States. Broadly defined as a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with disorganized atrial activation, AF results in an increased risk of stroke, heart failure, valvular heart disease, and impaired quality of life, and confers a significant burden on the health of individuals and society. AF in the perioperative setting is common and a significant source of perioperative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The latest iteration of the European Society of Cardiology AF guidelines published in 2020 provide the clinician a valuable road map for the management of this arrythmia. This expert review will comprehensively analyze the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines and provide perioperative management tools for the clinician.

Single centre 12 year experience with durable mechanical circulatory support: comparison with the EUROMACS registry.

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical circulatory support is an established therapy in end-stage heart failure. The EUROMACS registry was created to promote research in these patients. The aim of this report was to present our 12 year experience with the durable mechanical circulatory support devices and compare it with the EUROMACS registry. METHODS: Data from the entire EUROMACS registry from January 2011 to April 2019 were included (4704 implantations in 4410 patients). During the 12 years of our experience, until April 2019,125 mechanical support devices were implanted, in 122 patients. We compare patients´ characteristics, operative data and results with the EUROMACS registry and we report the major complications during the observational period. RESULTS: Primary end-point (death) occurred in 40 (32.8 %) patients in our cohort during the follow-up period, representing the survival rate 75 %, 68 %, and 58 % for 6, 12, 24 months respectively, which compares favourably with the data, reported by the EUROMACS registry, the survival 66 % and 53 % after 1 and 2 years respectively. Cerebrovascular accident occurred in 7 %, a bleeding event in 32 %, significant infection (driveline) in 78 % and a device malfunction in 13 % of the patients. Forty- three patients underwent a heart transplant with hospital and long-term mortality of 11.6 % and 14 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Mechanical circulatory support is a valuable therapeutic option with excellent survival rates, nevertheless it is associated with clinically significant complications rates. The direct comparison between our cohort and the EUROMACS registry showed that early implantation strategy and mini invasive approach may improve survival rates and decrease postoperative complications (Tab. 3, Fig. 3, Ref. 16).

Wi-Fi Assisted Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit for Neighbor Discovery and Selection in Millimeter Wave Device to Device Communications.

The unique features of millimeter waves (mmWaves) motivate its leveraging to future, beyond-fifth-generation/sixth-generation (B5G/6G)-based device-to-device (D2D) communications. However, the neighborhood discovery and selection (NDS) problem still needs intelligent solutions due to the trade-off of investigating adjacent devices for the optimum device choice against the crucial beamform training (BT) overhead. In this paper, by making use of multiband (µW/mmWave) standard devices, the mmWave NDS problem is addressed using machine-learning-based contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) algorithms. This is done by leveraging the context information of Wi-Fi signal characteristics, i.e., received signal strength (RSS), mean, and variance, to further improve the NDS method. In this setup, the transmitting device acts as the player, the arms are the candidate mmWave D2D links between that device and its neighbors, while the reward is the average throughput. We examine the NDS's primary trade-off and the impacts of the contextual information on the total performance. Furthermore, modified energy-aware linear upper confidence bound (EA-LinUCB) and contextual Thomson sampling (EA-CTS) algorithms are proposed to handle the problem through reflecting the nearby devices' withstanding battery levels, which simulate real scenarios. Simulation results ensure the superior efficiency of the proposed algorithms over the single band (mmWave) energy-aware noncontextual MAB algorithms (EA-UCB and EA-TS) and traditional schemes regarding energy efficiency and average throughput with a reasonable convergence rate.

Frozen elephant trunk repair of aortic aneurysms: How to reduce the incidence of endoleak and reintervention.

BACKGROUND: Frozen elephant trunk (FET) enables treatment of arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta aneurysms. In treating patients with single-stage FET, the relationship of distal stent size to endoleak and reintervention has remained unexamined. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of 63 cases in which FET was used to repair aneurysms between 2008 and 2019, 36 were intended as single-stage procedures. Effective sizing and sealing of distal stents were analyzed by preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). RESULTS: During a mean of 25.8 ± 5.7 months of CTA follow-up, 10 of 36 (28%) experienced endoleak, and 3 of 36 (8%) had sac expansion. Ultimately, 5 of 13 (38%) underwent thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. Patients without endoleak or sac expansion were more likely to have stents with >10% oversize and a >30-mm seal in healthy aorta compared with those experiencing these complications (11 of 23 vs 0 of 13; P = .0031). Conversely, 11 of 36 patients (31%) with adequately oversized and sealed stents developed fewer endoleaks compared with those without (0 of 11 vs 10 of 14; P < .0004). Patients with endoleak or sac expansion had smaller mean distal stent oversize and shorter mean sealing length compared with those without endoleak or sac expansion (2.3 ± 3.9% vs 18 ± 2.9% [P = .0023] and 1 ± 0.7 mm vs 34 ± 6 mm [P = .0005], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend >10% distal stent oversize and >30-mm sealing length to minimize endoleak and reintervention. Increasing multidisciplinary collaboration with endovascular surgeons will improve distal stent planning.

[ESC guidelines 2018 on myocardial revascularization : What must anesthesiologists know?] / ESC-Leitlinie 2018 "Myokardiale Revaskularisation" : Was muss der Anästhesiologe wissen?

In 2018 the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) published an update of the guidelines on myocardial revascularization from 2014. In these updated guidelines both associations agreed on joint recommendations concerning myocardial revascularization. Especially anesthesiologists being part of the cardiac anesthesia or heart team and intensive care physicians should have knowledge about the new or changed recommendations of these guidelines. This article summarizes the most important changes of the ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Discrepancy between the European clinical guidelines and myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease in Russia.

OBJECTIVE: In European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines, six indications have been proposed for making a decision on myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Our aim was to study a discrepancy between the actual clinical situation and ESC/EACTS indications on performing the revascularization in patients with CAD in Russia. DESIGN AND SETTING: We used retrospective clinical data on patients with stable CAD enrolled in the 2012-2015 Russian Registry of Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Heart Failure. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1522 patients with CAD (aged 53.0 ± 8.5 years, 76.2% male) were used for analysis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were divided into two groups: 591 patients with performed myocardial revascularization (named as R-CAD) and 931 patients refused from revascularization (named as NR-CAD). Factors associated with revascularization performance were identified by discriminant function analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ESC/EACTS indications for revascularization were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1196 patients with CAD had any ESC/EACTS indication for revascularization, but only 40.2% of them had performed invasive coronary intervention. Myocardial revascularization was appropriate in 81.4% of R-CAD patients and 76.8% of NR-CAD patients. The main factor of revascularization performance was any stenosis >50% and grades III-IV of stable angina. With non-performed revascularization, the following factors were associated: limiting angina or angina equivalent, unresponsive to medical therapy, atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease and increasing the New York Heart Association class of chronic heart failure. Most ESC/EACTS indications had little effect on decision-making on revascularization. CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between the actual clinical situation and ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization in patients with stable CAD in Russia.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Mitral Valve Repair: State of the Art Review.

Minimally invasive surgical mitral valve repair (MVRepair) has become routine for the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation, and indications have been expanded to include reoperations. Current European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease recommended standards in terms of mitral valve disease differentiation, timing of intervention and surgical techniques to improve patient care. Numerous minimally invasive techniques to lessen the invasiveness have been described, such as the minimal-access J-sternotomy (ministernotomy), the parasternal incision, the port-access technique and the right minithoracotomy. Despite the development of catheter-based techniques, surgical repair remains the gold standard today for nearly all patients with degenerative valvular diseases and the majority of patients with other types of valvular diseases. Techniques include resection of the prolapsed segment, neo-chordae implantation and ring annuloplasty. In this review, the current indications for mitral valve surgery are summarised and state-of-the-art MVRepair techniques are highlighted.

An overview of surgical treatment modalities and emerging transcatheter interventions in the management of tricuspid valve regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is frequently encountered and is most often functional (FTR) in nature. Surgical tricuspid valve (TV) treatment is well established in specialized centers. While transcatheter therapy for other valve disease is well established, interventional treatment of TV disease is still in its early stages. With the increasing adoption of catheter-based treatments, there is a growing interest in and need for interventional treatments for TR. An extensive literature search was methodologically performed aiming for an integrative review paper. Areas covered: This review will discuss the current surgical treatment modalities and emerging transcatheter interventions in the management of TR. Furthermore, this review will describe the pathophysiology of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR), and the new 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of TR. Finally, a five-year view into the future will be stated. Expert commentary: At their center, the authors have an aggressive approach for the treatment of FTR owing to its significant impact on perioperative as well as late postoperative morbidity and mortality. The authors perform TV ring annuloplasty when substantial annular dilation (≥45mm) is observed. In the future, percutaneous TV technologies might become an alternative option to treat TR patients with high surgical risk selectively.

Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Joint guidelines on myocardial revascularization were published by the European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery: Patients with left main stem, proximal left anterior descending, or 3-vessel disease should be discussed with a surgeon before revascularization, and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention has no elective indication in these categories. We assess the impact of the guidelines on referral patterns to a cardiac surgery service at a large-volume cardiac center in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Joint guidelines were published in August 2010. All patients with severe disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at one institution were identified 6 months before (January to June 2010) and 6 months after (January to June 2011) their introduction. Decision-making and surgical referral were determined from minutes of multidisciplinary meeting. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention pre-guidelines, of whom 62 had severe disease. Only 6 patients (9%) were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting before intervention. After introduction of the guidelines, elective percutaneous coronary interventions were performed in 164 patients, of whom 42 had surgical disease. Only 8 patients (17%) were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting before intervention (P = not significant). Follow-up was a median of 480 (380-514) days for the pre-guideline group and 104 (31-183) days for the post-guideline group. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in surgical disease occurred in 8 patients (14%) pre-guidelines and was unchanged for 9 patients (26%) post-guidelines (P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendation by both cardiology and cardiac surgical bodies and widespread publicity, a significant number of patients in this single-center study are not receiving optimal treatment recommended by these guidelines.

Assessing surgical risk for adults with congenital heart disease: are pediatric scoring systems appropriate?

BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital heart disease are frequently surviving into adulthood, and many of them will require surgery. Currently, there is no validated risk scoring system for adult congenital heart surgery, and predicting outcomes in these patients is challenging. Our objective was to determine if commonly used pediatric congenital heart disease surgery risk scores are also applicable to adults. METHODS: Four hundred fifty-eight adult (age ≥ 18 years) operations involving cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease between 2000 and 2010 at a single institution were studied retrospectively. The pediatric scores evaluated were the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) score, the Aristotle Basic Score, and the Society of Thoracic Surgery-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STAT) Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the ability of the scoring systems to predict mortality, major adverse events (stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, prolonged coma, deep sternal infection, reoperation, and operative mortality), and prolonged length of stay (>7 days). RESULTS: Of 458 operations, there were 16 (3%) deaths, 94 (21%) major adverse events, and 90 (20%) prolonged lengths of stay. Four hundred thirty (94%) of the operations were included in all 3 scoring systems and the ROC analysis. For mortality, areas under the ROC curve were 0.91, 0.91, and 0.65 for the Aristotle, STAT, and RACHS-1 scores, respectively. For major adverse event, areas under the ROC curves were 0.81, 0.76, and 0.61 for the Aristotle, STAT, and RACHS-1 scores, respectively. For prolonged length of stay, areas under the ROC curve were 0.82, 0.76, and 0.61 for the Aristotle, STAT, and RACHS-1 scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric risk scoring systems such as Aristotle, STAT, and RACHS-1 offer prognostic value in adults undergoing congenital heart surgery. The scores are predictive of mortality, major adverse events, and prolonged lengths of stay. The STAT and Aristotle systems fared best.

Long-term outcomes and comparison after conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for left main disease between patients classified as percutaneous coronary intervention recommendation classes II and III.

OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively analysed long-term outcomes after conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between patients having left main (LM) disease who should have been assigned class II and those assigned class III recommendation for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to the 2010 European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2009, conventional CABG was routinely employed in 180 consecutive patients with previously untreated and stable LM lesion. A comparison between two groups (CABG for PCI class II and CABG for PCI class III) was performed, looking at the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, stroke [cerebral vascular accident (CVA)], myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization. We also analysed the effects of variables on MACCE at 8 years after the operation. RESULTS: The overall 8-year MACCE rates were significantly lower in the CABG for PCI class II group than in the CABG for PCI class III group (9.7% class II vs 31.1% class III; P = 0.0005). This was largely because of an increased rate of repeat revascularization (1.2% class II vs 13.8% class III; P = 0.0029). The cumulative rate of the combined outcomes of all death/CVA/MI was significantly lower in the CABG for PCI class II group (8.5% class II vs 19.2% class III; P = 0.048); there was no observed difference between the groups for all-cause death, CVA and MI. The SYNTAX score was demonstrated to be the only significant predictor of combined outcomes (Death/CVA/MI) at 8 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, P = 0.023], repeat revascularization at 8 years (OR 1.11, P = 0.0013) and MACCE at 8 years (OR 1.07, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In our routine strategy of conventional CABG for LM disease, patients believed to be PCI candidates for LM disease have significantly better long-term outcomes as characterized by combined outcomes (Death/CVA/MI), repeat revascularization and MACCE. These results provide a suitable benchmark against which long-term outcomes of PCI for LM disease can be compared. The SYNTAX score, which was introduced to determine treatment for complex coronary disease, is indicative of long-term outcomes after CABG for LM disease.