Incarceration of a part of the gastric wall into the abdominal cavity in a patient with hiatal hernia and complete dislocation of the stomach (upside-down stomach).

An upside-down stomach is a rare type of hiatal hernia. An 83-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed an upside-down stomach and the incarceration of a part of the gastric body into the abdominal cavity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a circular ulcer caused by gastric ischemia. Although she was discharged after 1 week of conservative therapy, she was readmitted to the hospital 1 day after discharge because of a recurrence of hiatal hernia incarceration. She underwent laparoscopic surgery 4 days after readmission and recovered successfully.

[Antireflux laparoscopic intervention]. / Primenenie antireflyuksnogo laparoskopicheskogo vmeshatel'stva.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair for gastroesophageal reflux disease following hiatal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 56 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia .They underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair between January 2020 and January 2023. RESULTS: All surgeries were successful without conversion to open surgery. Surgery time was 56-180 min (mean 68.4±3.6), blood loss 30-200 ml (mean 40.3±5.6). No mortality and severe complications occurred. All patients were followed-up for 6-24 months. The GERD-Q and De Meester scores were significantly lower after 6 months compared to baseline values (p <0.05), and resting pressure was lower. Tone of lower esophageal sphincter was significantly higher compared to preoperative level (p <0.05). In 1-2 years after surgery, symptoms completely disappeared in 48 patients and significantly improved in 6 patients. Two patients had no improvement. Contrast-enhanced examination found no recurrent hiatal hernia and digestive tract obstruction. CONCLUSION. L: Aparoscopic fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair is safe and effective for gastroesophageal reflux disease with hiatal hernia.

Clinical and computed tomography outcomes after mesh-enforced hiatoplasty and anterior hemi-fundoplication in large hiatal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The surgical technique in large hiatal hernia (HH) repair is controversially discussed and the outcome measures and follow-up schemes are highly heterogeneous. The aim of this study is to assess the true recurrence rate using computed tomography (CT) in patients with standardized large HH repair. METHODS: Prospective single-center study investigating the outcome after dorsal, mesh-enforced large HH repair with anterior fundoplication. Endoscopy was performed after 3 months and clinical follow-up and CT after 12 months. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2021, 100 consecutive patients with large HH were operated in the same technique. There were two reoperations within the first 90 days for cephalad migration of the fundoplication. Endoscopic follow-up showed a correct position of the fundoplication and no relevant other pathologies in 99% of patients. Follow-up CT was performed in 100% of patients and revealed 6% of patients with a cephalad slippage, defined as migration of less than 3 cm of the wrap, and 7% of patients with a recurrent hernia. One patient of each group underwent subsequent reoperation due to symptoms. There was no statistical correlation between abnormal radiological findings and clinical outcomes with 69.2% of patients being asymptomatic. Multivariate logistic regression did not show any prognostic factor for an unfavorable radiologic outcome. Ninety-four percent of patients rated their outcomes as excellent or good. CONCLUSION: Radiological follow-up after large HH repair using CT allows to detect slippage of the fundoplication wrap and small recurrences. Patients with unfavorable radiological outcomes rarely require operative revision but should be considered for further follow-up.

Laparoscopic Collis-Nissen Procedure in a Patient With Type IV Hiatal Hernia: Relevance of a Short Esophagus.

A short esophagus is generally diagnosed during antireflux surgery and is defined as a distance of less than 2 cm between the gastroesophageal junction and the apex of the hiatus. We present a female patient with a CT diagnosis of type IV hiatal hernia who was scheduled for antireflux surgery, showed a short esophagus during the procedure, opted to perform Collis gastroplasty, and discharged without complications. A short esophagus remains a controversial topic. Some authors argue that it is more common than suspected and responsible for high recurrences in specific patient groups.

Comparative analysis of readmission rates and outcomes: Sleeve gastrectomy with versus without Nissen fundoplication using a National Database.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure. To study the safety of LSG done with Nissen Fundoplication (NF) in patients affected by obesity and GERD and assess the complication rate. A retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2019. A total of 236111 patients underwent LSG with and without NF. A matched cohort of 1096 without NF and 548 with NF was obtained. The median age of patients was 47 years old. Median length of hospital stay was higher in the LSG with NF group. Median total charge was higher in the LSG with NF group. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates in patients with obesity and GERD who received LSG with NF compared to those who received LSG alone. Complications after both procedures were low, which highlights the safety of both procedures.

Laparoscopic Management of Esophageal Epiphrenic Diverticulum.

A 45-year-old man who presented with progressive dysphagia of five months duration was diagnosed as a case of oesophageal epiphrenic diverticulum after endoscopic and imaging investigations. He underwent laparoscopic cardiomyotomy with Dor's fundoplication. Myotomy was done from the base of the diverticulum up to 2 cm distal to the gastroesophageal junction. Intraoperative endoscopy was done to check the adequacy of myotomy. Diverticulectomy was not done. Yet the patient had complete relief of symptoms and is well and asymptomatic after two years. Cardiomyotomy with anti-reflux procedures is effective in treating the epiphrenic diverticulum without the need for resection of the diverticulum, which also provides a better prognosis and less morbidity to the patient.

Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias > 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias > 2 cm. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible. RESULTS: Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4-94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0-7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0-5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0-8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0-13.8%). CONCLUSION: Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.

Determining the learning curve of minimally invasive antireflux surgery: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

The rapid uptake of minimally invasive antireflux surgery has led to interest in learning curves for this procedure. This study ascertains the learning curve in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted antireflux surgery. A systematic review of the literature pertaining to learning curves in minimally invasive fundoplication with or without hiatal hernia repair was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-regression analysis was undertaken to identify the number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency, and a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between cases that were undertaken during a surgeon's learning phase and experienced phase. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria. A meta-regression analysis was performed to quantitatively investigate the trend of number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency from 1996 to present day. Using a mixed-effects negative binomial regression model, the predicted learning curve for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted antireflux surgery was found to be 24.7 and 31.1 cases, respectively. The meta-analysis determined that surgeons in their learning phase may experience a moderately increased rate of conversion to open procedure (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28, 4.64), as well as a slightly increased rate of intraoperative complications (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.08, 2.38), postoperative complications (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.36, 2.87), and needing reintervention (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.16, 2.34). This study provides an insight into the expected caseload to be competent in performing antireflux surgery. The discrepancy between outcomes during and after the learning curve for antireflux surgery suggests a need for close proctorship for learning surgeons.

Laparoscopic Revisional Antireflux and Hiatal Hernia Surgery Results in a Higher Rate of Complications and Severity at 90-days Than Primary Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Data on graded complications and their frequency after laparoscopic revisional antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery compared to primary surgery are lacking. We describe 30- and 90-day morbidity using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. METHODS: 298 patients underwent revision surgery between 2003-2020 and were propensity matched to primary surgeries [1:2 ratio] based on age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, LA grade esophagitis, presence of Barrett's, and indication for surgery. Complications were graded using the CD classification, with the highest grade of complication reported per patient. RESULTS: After matching, both groups were majority females, with a median age of 60 and a median BMI of 29.5. Most were healthy, with non-erosive esophagitis and modest levels of Barrett's esophagus. A laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was most common; however, a partial fundoplication was more common in revisions. Mesh, relaxing incisions and Collis were more common in revisional surgery. At 30-days, total complications were similar [23.5%, (70/298) versus 20.6% (123/596), p=0.373] with 1 death in each group. Minor complications (0.001) more frequently, with esophageal obstruction requiring revision and esophageal/gastric leak being most common. Grade CD4A/B complications were comparable in both groups. At 90-days, revision patients experienced overall complications [7.1% (21) vs 2.0% (12), p=0.003], and CD3B complications [1.0% (3) vs 0 , p=0.037] more frequently, with intra-abdominal abscess washout being the most common CD3B complication. CONCLUSION: Revisional surgery results in similar total complications at 30 days but additional complications can occur out to 90 days.

Outcomes of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF 2.0): A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study in Academic and Community Practices (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is an established safe endoscopic technique for the management of GERD but with variable efficacy. In the last decade, the TIF technology and technique have been optimized and more widely accepted but data on outcomes outside clinical trials are limited. We tracked patient-reported and clinical outcomes of GERD patients after TIF 2.0. METHODS: Patients with BMI < 35, hiatal hernia < 2cm, and confirmed GERD with typical and/or atypical symptoms from 9 academic and community medical centers were enrolled in a prospective registry and underwent after TIF 2.0 performed by gastroenterologists and surgeons. The primary outcomes were safety and clinical success (response in >2 of 4 endpoints). Secondary endpoints were symptom improvement, acid exposure time (AET), esophagitis healing, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed at last follow-up within 12 months. RESULTS: 85 patients underwent TIF 2.0, 81 were included in the outcomes analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 94%, GERD-HRQL scores improved in 89%, and elevated RSI score normalized in 85% of patients with elevated baseline. Patient satisfaction improved from 8% to 79% (p <0.0001). At baseline, 81% were taking at least daily PPI, while 80% were on no or occasional PPI after TIF 2.0 (p<0.0001). Esophageal AET was normal in 72%, greater with an optimized TIF 2.0 valve >300 degree circumference, >3cm length (94% vs 57%, p=0.007). There were no TIF 2.0-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: TIF 2.0 is a safe and effective endoscopic outpatient treatment option for select patients with GERD.