The importance of surface composition and wettability on the dissolution performance of high drug loading amorphous dispersion formulations.

One of the limitations with an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation strategy is low drug loading. Hydrophobic drugs have poor wettability and require a substantial amount of polymer to stabilize the amorphous drug and facilitate release. Using grazoprevir and hypromellose acetate succinate as model drug and polymer respectively, the interplay between particle surface composition, particle wettability, and release performance was investigated. A hierarchical particle approach was used where the surfaces of high drug loading ASDs generated by either solvent evaporation or co-precipitation were further modified with a secondary excipient (i.e., polymer or wetting agent). The surface-modified particles were characterized for drug release, wettability, morphology, and surface composition using two-stage dissolution studies, contact angle measurements, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. Despite surface modification with hydrophilic polymers, hierarchical cPAD particles did not consistently exhibit good release performance. Contact angle measurements showed that the secondary excipient had a profound impact on particle wettability. Particles with good wettability showed improved drug release relative to particles that did not wet well, even with similar drug loadings. These observations underscore the intricate interplay between particle wettability and performance in amorphous dispersion formulations and illustrate a promising hierarchical particle approach to formulate high drug loading amorphous dispersions with improved dissolution performance.

Validated LC/MS method for simultaneous determination of elbasvir and grazoprevir in human plasma.

A sensitive and accurate LC/MS method for the determination of elbasvir (ELB) and grazoprevir (GZP) in human plasma was established using daclatasvir (DCT) as an internal standard. The analytes were separated on a Waters Spherisorb phenyl column (150mm×4.6mm ID, 5µm particle size) maintained at 40°C±2°C. Gradient elution, at a flow rate of 0.8mLmin-1, was used. The mobile phase consists of 90% of acetonitrile mixed to 10% of a 5mM ammonium formate buffer (+0.1% v/v of trimethylamine, pH was adjusted to 3.2 by formic acid) as phase A and 10% of acetonitrile mixed to 90% of the same buffer as phase B. Liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate solvent was used to recuperate compounds from plasma. The method was validated over a concentration range of 2 and 100ng/mL for GZP and between 1 and 50ng/mL for ELB. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy of the quality control samples at low, medium, and high concentration levels exhibited relative standard deviations (RSD)<15%, and the accuracy values ranged from 94.2 to 107.8%. The robustness of the method was established using a two-level full factorial design.

Safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 4 in Qassim region of Saudi Arabia.

Objective: Untreated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocellular cancer, and even death and also increases liver diseases. The elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR-GZR) treatment regimen when given in HCV genotype (GT) 1 and GT4 infection for 8 or 12 weeks showed a high sustained virolgical response (SVR) rates in different populations. This study was assessed the effectiveness as well as safety of EBR-GZR in 12 week treatment regimen in HCV GT4-infected treatment-naïve Saudi patients. Methods: This study conducted from June 2017 and December 2020 on Saudi HCV patients infected with GT4. Treatment protocol was given for 12 weeks in treatment-naive HCV GT4 infected cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic participants which were later followed for a total of 24 weeks for safety and efficacy of EBR-GZR. Results: We analyzed data of 54 participants with HCV GT 4 infection. Mean age was (53.46 ± 14.94) Treatment regimen was given to 14 cirrhotic (F4) and 40 non-cirrhotic (F0-F3). SVR was seen in 98.1% of participants with tolerable side effects and improved model for end stage liver disease (MELD) scores as fall in percentage seen from 18.5% to 14.8% in participants with MELD > 10. Conclusion: This retrospective study confirms that EBR-GZR for 12 weeks is a safe and effective treatment regimen in HCV GT4 patients in studied Saudi population. Treatment completion was followed by high SVR12 rates with improvement in prognostic markers of liver disease in participants with compensated cirrhosis. In short, the EBR-GZR combination showed efficacy in achieving the SVR12 in Child-Pugh B cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic population with a favorable safety profile.

High real-world effectiveness of 12-week elbasvir/grazoprevir without resistance testing in the treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1a infection in Norway.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The recommended treatment duration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a (GT1a) infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in the presence of a high baseline viral load and resistance associated substitutions (RAS) is 16 weeks with ribavirin added. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without ribavirin and regardless of baseline viral load and RAS testing. METHOD: This retrospective, observational cohort study was performed at five Norwegian hospitals that did not systematically utilize RAS testing. All adult patients with chronic HCV GT1a and compensated liver disease who had received 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without ribavirin and baseline RAS testing, were included. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12), or if not available, at week 4 (SVR4). RESULTS: We included 433 patients and attained SVR data on 388. The mean age was 45.7 years (22-73 years). 67.2% were male. HIV co-infection was present in 3.8% (16/424) and cirrhosis in 4% (17/424). The viral load was >800 000 IU/mL in 55.0% (235/427) of patients. Overall SVR was achieved in 97.2% (377/388). SVR was achieved in 98.3% (169/172) of those with viral load ≤800 000 IU/mL and in 96.2% (202/210) of those with viral load >800 000 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: We observed high SVR rates among patients with HCV GT1a infection treated with EBR/GZR for 12 weeks without ribavirin, with no regard to baseline viral load and no RAS testing.

An observational, prospective, multicenter study on the utilization and effectiveness of elbasvir-grazoprevir treatment association for chronic hepatitis C in France (ZEPHYR study).

Background and Aim: The efficacy and safety profiles of elbasvir-grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) has been established in more than 10 clinical trials. However, the characteristics of patients treated in routine clinical practice may differ. The present study was therefore designed to assess the real-life effectiveness of EBR/GZR therapy in the general population and among subgroups with a high hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in France. Methods: The Zephyr study was designed as a French, multicentre, prospective, observational study on EBR/GZR use and effectiveness in current practice in chronic hepatitis C patients. These results are based on data regarding the adult patients who received at least one dose of EBR/GZR between December 2017 and June 2019 in 67 French hospitals and clinics. Results: Overall, 478 patients were included. The Full Analysis Set corresponded to the 467 patients who met all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Gender was balanced and the mean age was 55.7 ± 13.3 years. The patients were mainly treatment-naive (89.5%) and infected with Genotype 1b (70.4%). Among the 75 patients with HCV Gt1a genotype, 56% had HCV RNA ≥ 800,000 IU/ml. F3-F4 fibrosis stage involved 24.2% of our population. Our subgroups were distributed among 110 migrants (23.6%), 58 (15.3%) using opioid agonist treatment, including people who inject drugs, 30 (6.8%) with chronic kidney disease Stages 3-5, 9 (1.9%) with an inherited blood disorder, and 4 (0.9%) coinfected with HIV. The remaining 269 (58.7%) were included in the general population subgroup. Overall, sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment reached 98.0% and remained consistent among genotype, HCV RNA values, fibrosis stage, and the subgroup of interest. The rate of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption​​​ and Life Habit questionnaire completion was high at each visit, with data suggesting alcohol consumption decrease and an improvement in quality of life. Conclusions: Using real-world evidence data on a French population representative of HCV patients, we confirmed the results obtained during EBR/GZR development program.

Improving Dissolution Performance and Drug Loading of Amorphous Dispersions Through a Hierarchical Particle Approach.

Co-precipitation is an emerging manufacturing strategy for amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs). Herein, the interplay between processing conditions, surface composition, and release performance was evaluated using grazoprevir and hypromellose acetate succinate as the model drug and polymer, respectively. Co-precipitated amorphous dispersion (cPAD) particles were produced in the presence and absence of an additional polymer that was either dissolved or dispersed in the anti-solvent. This additional polymer in the anti-solvent was deposited on the surfaces of the cPAD particles during isolation and drying to create hierarchical particles, which we define here as a core ASD particle with an additional water soluble component that is coating the particle surfaces. The resultant hierarchical particles were characterized using X-ray powder diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Release performance was evaluated using a two-stage dissolution test. XPS analysis revealed a trend whereby cPAD particles with a lower surface drug concentration showed improved release relative to particles with a higher surface drug concentration, for nominally similar drug loadings. This surface drug concentration could be impacted by whether the secondary polymer was dissolved in the anti-solvent or dispersed in the anti-solvent prior to isolating final dried hierarchical cPAD powders. Grazoprevir exposure in dogs was higher when the hierarchical cPAD was dosed, with ∼1.8 fold increase in AUC compared to the binary cPAD. These observations highlight the important interplay between processing conditions and ASD performance in the context of cPAD particles and illustrate a hierarchical particle design as a successful approach to alter ASD surface chemistry to improve dissolution performance.

Efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment for Chinese patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) treatment in Chinese patients with GT1b chronic hepatitis virus C (HCV) infections. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 49 treatment-naive patients with chronic GT1b HCV infection were treated with GZR (100 mg) plus EBR (50 mg) for 12 weeks. The viral response was the primary endpoint and fibrosis stage changes during and after treatment, as well as the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: After 2-week EBR/GZR treatment, the virologic response rate was 85.1% (80/94) and reached 100% (94/94) after 8 and 12 weeks of therapy. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 100% at the 12, 24 and 48-week follow-ups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the baseline viral load of HCV RNA may affect the rapid 2-week virologic response (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.92, P=0.034), but did not influence efficacy during further treatment or follow-ups. Fifteen patients with ≥1 TEAE (16.0%) were observed and 7 (7.4%) and 8 (8.5%) patients had mild ALT or AST elevations (1.1-2.5× BL), but no serious drug-related AEs occurred. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), the AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis index based on 4 factor (FIB4) scores were consistently reduced, especially in patients with high baseline assessments after 12 weeks' treatment and during follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: A 12-week EBR/GZR regimen shows high efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with GT1b HCV infections.

Cost-Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review.

Objective: This study aims to systematically review recent economic evaluations of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for chronic hepatitis C (CHC), to critically appraise the reporting quality and to summarize the results. Methods: A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, EconLit, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Chongqing VIP to identify original articles containing economic evaluations of EBR/GZR for CHC published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2020. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement was used to assess the quality of reporting of the articles. Results: Of 93 articles identified, 13 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in 4 countries, and 8 active interventions were assessed. The target population was patients infected with CHC genotype 1 infection in all studies. Eight out of 13 studies that compared EBR/GZR vs. other direct antiviral agents suggested that EBR/GZR was generally more cost-effective or dominant than daclatasvir/asunaprevir (DCV/ASV), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir (3D) but not more cost-effective than glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB). Two studies from China and one study from the USA that compared EBR/GZR vs. pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) consistently indicated that EBR/GZR was generally more cost-effective than PegIFN/RBV. One study from Italy compared EBR/GZR with SOF + PegIFN/RBV and suggested that EBR/GZR had a lower cost and higher effectiveness. One study from France and one study from the USA confirmed that compared with non-therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease, EBR/GZR was cost-effective at commonly accepted current standards. All included studies were of good quality of reporting, with an average score of 21.9 (range 19-23). Conclusion: EBR/GZR for CHC genotype 1 might be cost-effective or dominant compared with PegIFN/RBV and other direct antiviral agents (SOF/VEL, 3D, DCV/ASV, LDF/SOF) or non-therapy. However, under certain assumptions, EBR/GZR was not a cost-effective alternative for CHC patients vs. GLE/PIB.

Transient flare of psoriasis under direct-acting antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: A case report.

Extrahepatic manifestations of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection frequently involve the skin. Here, we report the case of a woman, who experienced a psoriasis exacerbation on DAA treatment, which lead to psoriasis resolution upon HCV clearance under continued treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir.

The efficacy of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir fixed-dose combination for 8 weeks in HCV treatment and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic, genotype 4-infected patients (ELEGANT-4): A single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Background: Cost, adverse events, and long treatment duration can be significant obstacles in treating hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected individuals. Shortening the treatment regimen can minimize these barriers, thereby enhancing adherence and increasing medication availability to more patients. Methods: This is a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial on treatment naïve, non-cirrhotic, HCV genotype 4 patients. The study aimed to evaluate an 8-week course of Elbasvir (ELB)/Grazoprevir (GZR) in this population. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR-12). The secondary endpoints were SVR-4, adverse events, and changes in health- and hepatitis-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: Of the 30 patients who were enrolled, 29 (97%) achieved SVR-12 and SVR-4 (95% CI: 90-100%). No patients experienced serious or life-threatening adverse events (AEs), but mild/moderate AEs were reported by 16 (53%). The most commonly reported AEs were itching/skin rash (20%), headache (16.7%), abdominal/epigastric pain and decreased appetite (13.3% each), and nausea/vomiting (10%). Marked improvements in HRQoL were reported between the first (baseline) and third (SVR-12) timepoints. HRQoL score improvements involved the physical, mental, and hepatitis-specific indices, and ranged between 6 and 42 points (out of 100, P ≤0.003). Conclusion: The trial provides empirical evidence that HCV genotype 4-infected patients can achieve viral eradication with an 8-week-regimen of ELB/GZR. Further, this course of treatment is associated with a minimal adverse event profile and potentially significant improvements in quality of life. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03578640).