An Unusual Mimic of Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Case Report.

Axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic inflammatory condition predominantly affecting the sacroiliac joints and spine, typically presenting before the age of 45 years with inflammatory back pain. However, diagnostic challenges arise when atypical features and negative autoimmune markers obscure the clinical picture. We present a case of a male in his 40s with no significant medical history, presenting with a three-month history of inflammatory back pain. Despite negative human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) status, clinical examination, including positive findings on the FABER (flexion, abduction, and external rotation) test and exaggerated muscle tenderness, raised suspicion of axial SpA. An MRI of the pelvis confirmed bilateral symmetrical sacroiliitis, supporting the diagnosis. Unexpectedly, further investigations revealed a very low vitamin D level, normal calcium levels, and elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH), suggesting secondary hyperparathyroidism. A subsequent PET scan disclosed increased uptake posterior to the right lobe of the thyroid, prompting consideration of secondary hyperparathyroidism due to severe vitamin D deficiency. Treatment with vitamin D supplementation and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs yielded remarkable improvement in symptoms, with normal repeat blood investigations post-treatment. This case underscores the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach in patients with inflammatory back pain, especially when classical markers such as HLA-B27 are negative. It highlights the potential interplay between axial SpA and secondary hyperparathyroidism, emphasizing the need for vigilance and interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical practice.

Inflammatory Back Pain and Psoriasis: Expecting Spondyloarthritis, Discovering Lymphoma.

Inflammatory back pain is a characteristic of spondyloarthritis. It is not, however, an exclusive symptom of inflammatory rheumatic diseases as it can also be associated with non-inflammatory entities. Infrequently, the etiology can be found in neoplastic conditions such as malignant lymphoma. Even in the presence of comorbidities indicatory of underlying rheumatic disease, like psoriasis vulgaris, the clinician should not be led astray. It is essential to pay attention to contradictory findings, as treatment crucially differs depending on diagnosis. Herein, we report on a psoriasis patient who presented with characteristic inflammatory back pain and deceptive imaging results. While the patient was initially thought to suffer from an inflammatory rheumatic disease with axial involvement, it was the accompanying atypical circumstances, particularly her age, that instantly challenged the diagnosis of axial psoriatic arthritis. She was eventually diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma that manifested with rare and exclusively extranodal lesions and spondyloarthritis-like morphology. This case effectively demonstrates the importance of a thorough diagnostic workup and how certain clinical factors, such as the patient's age, should be considered when confronted with inflammatory back pain.

Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.

Background: Inflammatory back pain is a chronic condition with localized pain, particularly in the axial spine and sacroiliac joints, that is associated with morning stiffness and improves with exercise. YouTube is the second most frequently used social media platform for accessing health information. This study sought to investigate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on inflammatory back pain (IBP). Methods: The study design was planned as cross-sectional. A search was conducted using the term "inflammatory back pain," and the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria were selected on October 19, 2023. The data of the videos selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the study settings were examined. Videos with English language, with audiovisual content , had a duration >30 s, non-duplicated and primary content related to IBP were included in the study. A number of video parameters such as the number of likes, number of views, duration, and content categories were assessed. The videos were assessed for reliability using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria and the DISCERN tool. Quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS). Continuous variables were checked for normality of distribution using Shapiro-Wilk test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the continuous data depending on the number of groups. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test. Results: Reliability assessment based on JAMA scores showed 21% of the videos to have high reliability. Quality assessment based on GQS results showed 19% of the videos to have high quality. JAMA, DISCERN, and GQS scores differed significantly by source of video (p < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.002, respectively). Video duration had a moderate positive correlation with scores from the GQS (r = 0.418, p < 0.001), JAMA (r = 0.484, p < 0.001), and modified DISCERN (r = 0.418, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that YouTube offers videos of low reliability and low quality on inflammatory back pain. Health authorities have a responsibility to protect public health and should take proactive steps regarding health information shared on social media platforms.

A Survey Exploring Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background Diagnostic delay of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a widely recognized issue worldwide, providing a great burden for patients with this disease. AxSpA is present in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This UK study primarily aims to identify the presence of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in patients attending IBD clinic. Further aims of this study include investigating if participants had received further referrals and diagnoses for their IBP and considering factors contributing to diagnostic delay. Methods Patients were recruited from a Royal Free London NHS Trust hospital's IBD clinic. Each participant completed a 23-question survey. The Berlin criteria were applied to the questions to investigate the presence of IBP. Further questions were asked about their IBD diagnosis and treatment, the healthcare professionals they had seen for their back pain, and other extra-articular features associated with axSpA. Results Seventy-five patients completed the online survey sent out via email. Forty percent (n = 30) of participants were female and 60% (n = 45) were male. Sixty-one percent (n = 36) of participants from the colitis clinic reported they had back pain, and 41% of the participants reported back pain for over three months. Of these, 39% (12) of participants fulfilled the Berlin criteria for IBP. Of patients experiencing back pain for over three months, we found that 10% (3) fulfilled the Berlin criteria but had not received a diagnosis for their IBP. All patients who had fulfilled the Berlin criteria but had not received a diagnosis for their IBP had seen their general practitioner (GP) and an allied healthcare professional, but not a rheumatologist. Conclusions This study highlights the presence of possibly undiagnosed axSpA in patients with IBD. The reasons for the diagnostic delay of axSpA are multifactorial. We consider specific patient characteristics, lack of awareness and education of the condition, and issues in the referral process. There is a need to improve education and awareness of axSpA, reconsider referral processes, and consider new initiatives such as joint specialty clinics to identify and treat axSpA on time.

Knowledge of Back Pain and Spinal Disorders Among the General Population in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.

Introduction  Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common global health problems and the second most common reason for seeking medical advice. However, most LBP does not indicate a serious disorder. Over half of the Saudi Arabian population experiences LBP at least once in their lives. Therefore, it is important to assess and understand how people manage this health problem. This study assessed back pain and spinal disorder knowledge among the general population in Saudi Arabia's western region. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of the general population in western Saudi Arabia. The data were collected using an online, self-administered, Arabic version of the validated questionnaire about LBP. A statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using a software program. Results A total of 754 eligible participants completed the questionnaire. Less than half of the participants could correctly define acute and chronic LBP and sciatica. Only 19.2% of participants were aware that medical history and clinical examinations are used to diagnose LBP. Young participants, university graduates, and unmarried participants had good LBP knowledge. Conclusion This study showed that the general population of Saudi Arabia in the Western region needs more knowledge about the definitions of acute and chronic LBP. However, they had fair knowledge about the aggravating factors and triggers of LBP. Young participants had better knowledge about LBP. Awareness campaigns with brochures and flyers can be used to increase the population's knowledge.

A Patient Survey Exploring the Burden of Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Known Psoriasis.

Background In the United Kingdom, diagnostic delay remains a challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Psoriasis is a frequently identified extra-musculoskeletal manifestation associated with axSpA. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in psoriasis patients at a specialized psoriasis dermatology clinic in a London NHS Trust. Our primary goal was to identify psoriasis patients with IBP who were not referred to a rheumatologist, potentially leading to axSpA diagnostic delays. Additionally, we aimed to investigate factors contributing to these delays and strategies to address them. Methodology A patient survey consisting of 22 questions was used to assess the prevalence of IBP among 66 psoriasis patients attending a weekly specialized psoriasis dermatology clinic within a London NHS Trust between May and July 2023. The survey comprised patient demographic information along with inquiries about the existence of back pain exceeding three months. The Berlin Criteria was utilized to identify IBP among patients who reported experiencing back pain for over three months. Additionally, the survey sought information on prior diagnosis of axSpA and whether participants had consulted healthcare professionals regarding their back pain. Results Of the 66 patients invited, 51 (77%) completed the survey. The average age of the patients was 50 years (range = 19-74 years), with 58.8% being female. The mean duration of psoriasis was 15.7 years (range = 2-44 years). Overall, 45% (23/51) reported back pain lasting over three months. Among the patients who reported back pain for more than three months, 13 met the Berlin Criteria for IBP (25% of the total surveyed), and only four of these patients had a diagnosis of axSpA. Notably, seven patients (14% of the total surveyed) potentially had undiagnosed axSpA. General practitioners (GPs) were commonly consulted for back pain, yet only 39% of those with prolonged back pain had seen a rheumatologist. Despite experiencing prolonged back pain, 17% of patients had not sought healthcare advice for their symptoms. Conclusions This study highlights that IBP is a common yet underdiagnosed comorbidity in psoriasis patients. Dermatologists, GPs, and other allied healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting early axSpA. However, limited awareness of IBP hinders its identification in psoriasis patients and subsequent referral to rheumatologists. This highlights the need for improving awareness and education regarding axSpA among dermatologists and allied healthcare professionals as well as the public and patients to ensure timely diagnosis. The development of simple and easy-to-administer screening questionnaires to aid non-rheumatologists in identifying patients with IBP together with simplified referral pathways would increase onward referrals of appropriate patients to rheumatologists.

A lower frequency of inflammatory back pain in male patients with ankylosing spondylitis compared with female patients.

In routine rheumatology practice, we noticed that a significant number of male ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients did not experience inflammatory back pain (IBP). Based on this observation, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of IBP in male AS patients and compare it to that in female patients. Patients with AS who fulfilled the modified New York criteria were subjected to a face-to-face interview with a standardized questionnaire that addressed the IBP components based on the Berlin criteria. The study also included 63 patients with chronic mechanical back pain (MBP). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity, Function, and Metrology Indexes (BASDAI, BASFI, and BASMI) were evaluated in patients with AS. There were 181 patients with AS (124 males, mean age 41.2 years; 57 females, mean age 44.6 years) and 63 patients with MBP (28 males, mean age 47.2 years; 35 females, mean age 43.5 years). The prevalence of IBP was found to be 87.7% in female and 66.1% in male patients with AS (p = 0.002). The specificity of the criteria was determined to be high both in females (85.7%) and males (89.2%). Female patients with AS had higher BASDAI levels than males (p = 0.048), but no difference was found in BASFI, BASMI, or serum CRP levels between genders. A considerable proportion of male patients with AS did not experience IBP, although they had similar CRP levels compared with females.

A mixed methods study to uncover impediments to accurate diagnosis of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis in the USA.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Delayed diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is well documented; little is known about the diagnostic journey and impediments for US patients with nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). It is hypothesized that impediments are varied and exist at both the healthcare provider (HCP) and patient levels. This study aims to understand patient experiences and contributors to delayed nr-axSpA diagnosis in the USA. METHOD: Interviews of adults with rheumatologist-diagnosed nr-axSpA, recruited through Spondylitis Association of America outreach and patient panels, and of rheumatologists, explored the diagnostic journey and diagnostic barriers. Emerging themes were further explored in an online patient survey. A multiple logistic regression analysis evaluated the main outcome variable, factors affecting time to nr-axSpA diagnosis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 25 patients and 16 rheumatologists. Survey responses from 186 eligible patients revealed median time from symptom onset to diagnosis of nr-axSpA was 3.25 years. Delayed diagnosis was significantly more likely for women and people in rural areas. Most patients consulted ≥4 different types of HCPs before a rheumatologist and ≥2 rheumatologists before diagnosis. Impediments to timely diagnosis included insidious chronic pain; episodic symptom patterns attributed to activity; symptoms other than chronic lumbosacral back pain requiring medical consultation; and unfamiliarity with and misperceptions about nr-axSpA among HCPs, radiologists, and rheumatologists. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed nr-axSpA diagnosis is common and reflects HCP knowledge gaps and frequent patient presentation with dominant nonaxial symptoms. Targeted HCP education, research into early disease patterns, and interventions sensitive to the broader spectrum of nr-axSpA manifestations are needed to improve timely diagnosis. Key Points • Patients with nr-axSpA often see multiple types of HCPs, and multiple rheumatologists, before receiving a diagnosis. • Both patients and HCPs are unfamiliar with nr-axSpA and its symptoms, lacking understanding that nr-axSpA can occur in young people, females, and those presenting with normal x-rays. • Disease recognition by nonrheumatology HCPs is key for early referral. • Education on cardinal features, epidemiology, burden, and benefits of timely nr-axSpA diagnosis is warranted for HCPs who commonly manage back pain.

Patient Survey Exploring the Burden of Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Uveitis.

Background  In the UK, diagnostic delays remain a challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Studies have shown that acute anterior uveitis is the most common extra-articular manifestation associated with axSpA. As part of a National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS) Aspiring to Excellence quality improvement project, this study aimed to ascertain the burden of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in patients attending a uveitis clinic and to establish the number of these patients who had not been referred to a rheumatologist, thereby contributing to the diagnostic delay. The secondary aims were to explore the factors contributing to the diagnostic delay. Methods  A 22-question patient survey was created to identify the burden of back pain in patients attending a specialist uveitis clinic at a London NHS Trust. Participants were recruited when attending their clinic appointments. Survey content included patient demographics and whether they had experienced back pain for longer than three months. The Berlin Criteria was used to identify the presence of inflammatory back pain, and it was also ascertained whether participants had a previous diagnosis of axSpA. Participants were asked if they had seen any healthcare professionals regarding their back pain and the total number of consultations they had had with each profession. Results  A cohort of 50 patients who attended the uveitis clinic at the Royal Free London NHS Trust completed the survey between February and July 2022. The mean age of the respondents was 52 years with a mean length of time with uveitis of 6.57 years. Of them, 64% were female and 36% were male. Forty per cent (40%) of participants (20 respondents) reported experiencing back pain for more than three months and 12% (six respondents) had a diagnosis of axSpA. Of those who reported back pain for more than three months, the mean age of onset of back pain was 28.6 years. Of the 14 participants (28%) who had back pain and were not diagnosed with axSpA, nine (18%) fulfilled the Berlin criteria for IBP. All participants had seen a GP or allied health professional specifically for their back pain. On average, respondents had seen two allied healthcare professionals, but only 40% (eight) of respondents with back pain had been seen by a rheumatologist. Conclusions  In this study, the data highlights that inflammatory back pain is common in patients with uveitis and the majority of patients with inflammatory back pain had not been referred to a rheumatology service and potentially have undiagnosed axSpA. Contributing factors to this potential delay in diagnosis include a lack of awareness of axSpA and its presenting features and associated conditions and a lack of onward referral for a specialist rheumatology opinion. This highlights the need for public, patient and healthcare professional education and the development of timely referral pathways to reduce delays in diagnosis.

Clinical profile of ankylosing spondylitis at a teaching hospital.

Introduction/Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a type of spondyloarthropathy, is an autoimmune disease that mainly involves spine joints, sacroiliac joints and their adjacent soft tissues, such as tendons and ligaments. Progression of disease can lead to fibrosis and calcification, resulting in the loss of flexibility and mobility of the spine. The common clinical presentation is inflammatory back pain which is often neglected. The aim of our study was to assess the demographic and clinical proflie of patients of ankylosing spondylitis diagnosed on the basis of radiographic sacroillitis. Methods: In a cross sectional hospital based study, the patients visiting to outpatient departments with inflammatory back pain were evaluated and 200 patients who had sacroiliitis according to modified New york criteria were diagnosed to have ankylosing spondylitis.The demographic and clinical profile was studied. Disease activity was assessed by using the ASDAS and BASDAI and function by BASFI and BASMI. Results: Amongst the study participants, 72 % were males and 28 % were females. The mean age of participants was 46± 12years. The mean duration of symptoms was10± 3 years. Out of all, 92% patients were HLA B27 positive. High BASDAI score (>4) was positively correlated with elevated CRP, ESR ,neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and had negative correlation with serum vitamin D levels. Conclusion: Most of the patients in our study had advanced disease might be due to delay in the diagnosis. They had high BASDAI with elevated inflammatory markers. Awareness for early and definite diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis is needed to prevent irreversible structural damage, and worsening of quality of life.

Résumé Introduction/Contexte: La spondylarthrite ankylosante (AS), un type de spondyloarthropathie, est une maladie auto-immune qui implique principalement Les articulations de la colonne vertébrale, les articulations sacroiliaques et leurs tissus mous adjacents, tels que les tendons et les ligaments. La progression de la maladie peut entraîner une fibrose et Calcification, entraînant la perte de flexibilité et de mobilité de la colonne vertébrale. La présentation clinique courante est les maux de dos inflammatoires qui est souvent négligé. Le but de notre étude était d'évaluer le proflie démographique et clinique des patients de la spondylarthrite ankylosante diagnostiquée sur la base de la sacroie radiographique. Méthodes: Dans une étude en section d'hôpital transversal, les patients visitant des services ambulatoires avec des maux de dos inflammatoires ont été évalués et 200 patients souffrant de sacro -iliite selon les critères modifiés de New York ont été diagnostiqués avoir une spondylite ankylosante. Le profil démographique et clinique a été étudié. L'activité de la maladie a été évaluée en utilisant les Asdas et Basdai et fonction par Basfi et Basmi. Résultats: Parmi les participants à l'étude, 72% étaient des hommes et 28% étaient des femmes. La moyenne L'âge des participants était de 46 ± 12 ans. La durée moyenne des symptômes était de 10 ± 3 ans. Sur tous, 92% des patients étaient positifs HLA B27. Le score de Basdai élevé (> 4) était positivement corrélé avec le rapport lymphocytaire CRP, ESR, ESR élevé et avait une corrélation négative avec taux sériques de vitamine D. Conclusion: La plupart des patients de notre étude avaient une maladie avancée pourraient être dus à un retard dans le diagnostic. Ils avaient Basdai élevé avec des marqueurs inflammatoires élevés. Une conscience pour un diagnostic précoce et définitif de la spondylarthrite ankylosante est nécessaire pour prévenir Dommages structurels irréversibles et aggravation de la qualité de vie. Mots-clés: spondylarthrite ankylosante, indice d'activité de la spondylarthrite ankylosante du bain, maux de dos inflammatoires, spondyloarthropathie.

Differential diagnosis of back pain.

Back pain (BP) is among the most common reasons for seeking medical attention worldwide. The nature of BP depends on the causative stimulus and its anatomical location. Clinically, BP is manifested by pain, muscle tension, and stiffness. The development of BP is a very complex, multifactorial process in which not only somatic stimuli (anatomical structures), but also psychosocial effects are involved. Using a variety of criteria, BP can be divided into specific where the cause of pain is known, nonspecific wherein the cause remains unclear, or according to its duration (i.e., acute, subacute, and chronic back pain). Simple low back pain must be distinguished from inflammatory BP. Inflammatory BP is one of the symptoms of spondyloarthritides. It is typically a resting pain of insidious onset, peaking at night or in the morning associated with morning stiffness, improved with exercise, and responding to non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs. A red-flag system was developed for the early identification of at-risk patients with a potentially severe disease presenting with BP. Early diagnosis and identification of the cause of complaints often requires multidisciplinary cooperation. The treatment involves pharmacological agents (analgesic and muscle relaxation therapies) and nonpharmacological approaches (rehabilitation, surgical intervention, etc.).

Axial Pain and Arthritis in Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data.

Objective: To estimate the nationally representative prevalence of chronic axial pain, inflammatory back pain (IBP), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and peripheral arthritis in persons diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients and Methods: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from the 1976-1980 and 2009-2010 survey cycles. Results: In NHANES 1976-1980, the chronic axial pain prevalence in participants with diagnosed ulcerative colitis (UC) was 19.5% vs 7.2% in the general population (P<.01). Neck or upper back, lower back, and Amor criteria-based axial pain were also significantly increased (11.2%, 14.5%, and 13.0%, respectively, vs 3%-5% in the general population (P<.01). In those with diagnosed UC, 40% had axial pain onset at an age older than 45 years; 30.2% reported peripheral arthralgias, and 12.2% reported peripheral arthritis. Arthritis findings on examination were uncommon. In NHANES 2009-2010, axial pain in those diagnosed with IBD had similar patterns. Conclusion: Despite high rates of chronic axial pain in those with IBD, few cases met the IBP and axSpA classification criteria. This apparent discrepancy is unexplained. However, in IBD, axial pain onset at an age older than 45 years is common; and these may not meet IBP and axSpA age criteria. Also, neck pain was increased in those with IBD but is not included in most IBP and axSpA criteria. Peripheral arthralgias and chronic arthritis symptoms were common, but examination findings were not, suggesting that tenosynovitis or enthesitis is more likely than frank arthritis to occur in patients with UC.

Utility of selected sequence MRI imaging of the axial skeleton in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis.

Background: Whole body MRI has been used to evaluate inflammatory lesions associated with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). These sequences are extensive, time consuming and add to the cost of the investigation. We aimed to determine the utility of selected sequence MRI imaging of the axial skeleton including spine, pelvis and sacroiliac (SI) joints to identify features of (SpA). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 76 patients diagnosed with SpA that underwent a selective sequence MRI imaging of the axial skeleton. The MRI were reported by two musculoskeletal trained radiologists were reviewed. The MRI sequences included whole spine sequences of sagittal STIR (short tau inversion recovery), T1 weighted and T2 weighted sequences. Coronal STIR and T1 weighted images were studied for SI joints and pelvis. The MRI were assessed based on the guidelines outlined by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) for features of spondylitis, spondylodiscitis, enthesitis, synovitis, capsulitis, bone marrow edema, fatty marrow replacement, erosions and bony ankylosis. Inflammatory lesions were documented in the spine, sacroiliac, facet, hip and costovertebral joints. Results: The mean scan duration was 28 min. SI joint involvement was noted in 74 (97.3%) of patients. The other most prevalent findings were spondylitis in 44 (57.8%) patients, costovertebral joint involvement in 31 (40.7%), facet joint lesions in 32 (42.1%), spondylodiscitis in 21 (27.6%), enthesitis in 13 (17.1%), hip lesions in 16 (21%) and ankylosis in 10 (13.1%). Conclusions: This selective sequence imaging of the pelvis and spine was able to identify typical lesions of SpA in a shorter time period. Fifty-five percent patients had lesions in the posterior elements including facet joints and costovertbral joints that would be missed on traditional SI joint imaging.

Evaluation of musculoskeletal adverse effects in patients on systemic isotretinoin treatment: A cross-sectional study.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the frequency of musculoskeletal adverse effects in acne vulgaris patients receiving systemic isotretinoin treatment. Patients and methods: Between January 2016 and December 2017, a total of 200 severe acne patients (22 males, 178 females; mean age: 21.8±0.4 years; range, 15 to 53 years) who were on isotretinoin treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Data including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), duration of disease, diagnosis, and comorbidities were recorded. Back pain severity was evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: The treatment period was mean 8.5±0.1 (range, 6 to 12) months. The dose of isotretinoin was mean 0.6±0.1 (range, 0.5 and 1) mg/kg. Musculoskeletal side effects were seen in 99 (49.5%) patients. Back pain was reported during the treatment period in 78 (78.7%) patients. The diagnosis was mechanical back pain in 31 (39.7%) and inflammatory back pain in 47 (60.3%) patients. The moderate-severe back pain group received higher cumulative isotretinoin doses than the mild back pain group (p=0.003). The BMI values did not show a significant difference between the patients with and without back pain (p=0.55). There was no significant correlation between the BMI and VAS scores (p=0.06). The VAS scores were found to be correlated with age (p=0.04). Sacroiliitis was diagnosed in four (4%) patients. One (1%) patient was diagnosed with enthesitis. Creatine kinase elevation was reported in 18 (18.1%) patients, while three (3%) patients described myalgia of mild severity. Conclusion: Low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal side effects of isotretinoin treatment that usually resolves with dose reduction. The cumulative dose of isotretinoin does not seem to play a role in the development of back pain, but can determine pain severity. Pain severity is directly correlated with the increasing age. Evaluation of the patients for musculoskeletal side effects during isotretinoin use is important in clinical practice, as it is a common occurrence.

Isotretinoin-induced inflammatory back pain and sacroiliitis in patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.

INTRODUCTION: Isotretinoin has been reported to induce inflammatory back pain (IBP) and sacroiliitis in the patients with acne vulgaris. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of IBP and sacroiliitis in patients receiving isotretinoin treatment compared with oral antibiotics for acne vulgaris. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 201 patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris who received isotretinoin (n = 100) or oral antibiotics (n = 101) were included in the study. All patients were monthly questioned for IBP symptoms during their treatment. Patients described IBP were also evaluated for sacroiliitis by c-reactive protein, sedimentation rate, HLAB27, and sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Isotretinoin was discontinued in all patients diagnosed as sacroiliitis, and these patients were reevaluated after 3 months. RESULTS: IBP was observed in 21 (10.4%), and sacroiliitis was detected in 11 (11%) patients on isotretinoin treatment; in oral antibiotic group, we did not observe IBP or sacroiliitis. The incidence of IBP and sacroiliitis differed significantly between the isotretinoin and oral antibiotic groups (p < 0.0001, p = 0.02). Complete regression was observed in the great majority of patients following cessation of isotretinoin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the largest prospective controlled study that investigated the incidence of sacroiliitis in patients receiving isotretinoin and compared with patients using oral antibiotics.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Inflammatory Back Pain: Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: 2021 Update.

Inflammatory back pain is a hallmark feature of axial spondyloarthritis, a heterogeneous group of inflammatory disorders which affects the sacroiliac joints and spine. Imaging plays a key role in diagnosis of this disease and in facilitating appropriate treatment. This document provides evidence-based recommendations on the appropriate use of imaging studies during multiple stages of the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Algorithm for the referral of patients with inflammatory back pain from primary care in Malaysia.

Chronic low back pain, defined as back pain lasting for more than three months, can be divided into mechanical or inflammatory back pain (IBP). IBP typically starts in patients below the age of 40, is improved with activity and worsens with rest. IBP is strongly associated with axial spondyloarthritis. Early recognition of IBP among primary care physicians is essential for timely diagnosis and intervention to ensure the best outcomes for patients with axial spondyloarthritis. This paper describes the Malaysian Society of Rheumatology's recently developed Inflammatory Back Pain Referral Algorithm for primary care physicians, which aims to facilitate the early identification and referral of IBP patients to rheumatologists.

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis: An update for rheumatologists.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous, chronic, inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that can lead to peripheral and axial damage and loss of function. Axial involvement occurs in 25% to 70% of patients with PsA, varying greatly depending on its definition, with the key manifestations being sacroiliitis and/or spondylitis. However, there are no agreed-upon classification or diagnostic criteria for axial involvement in PsA and no consensus on treatment paradigms, which complicates management of PsA. There have only been a few studies assessing biologics in patients with PsA with axial involvement, and most treatment plans are based on evidence from patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatologists therefore face many challenges in the management of axial PsA, including diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and choice of appropriate treatment. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, differential diagnoses, treatment options, and prognosis of axial PsA, with the aim of increasing rheumatologists' knowledge of this phenotype of PsA and thereby aiding its optimal management.

Axial Psoriatic Disease: Clinical and Imaging Assessment of an Underdiagnosed Condition.

The frequent involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joint has justified the classification of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the Spondyloarthritis group. Even if different classification criteria have been developed for PsA and Spondyloarthritis over the years, a well-defined distinction is still difficult. Although the majority of PsA patients present peripheral involvement, the axial involvement needs to be taken into account when considering disease management. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of axial disease may vary from 25 to 70% in patients affected by PsA. To date, no consensus definition has been reached in the literature and the definition of axial involvement in PsA has varied from isolated sacroiliitis to criteria used in ankylosing spondylitis. This article reviews the unmet needs in the clinical and radiological assessment of axial PsA, reporting the various interpretations of axial involvement, which have changed over the years. Focusing on both imaging and clinical standpoints, we reported the prevalence of clinical and radiologic features, describing the characteristics of axial disease detectable by X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and PET-CT, and also describing the axial symptoms and outcome measures in patients affected by axial disease.