Comparing redo surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent, residual, and/or tumors showing progression in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are well-differentiated benign tumors originating from the adenohypophyseal cells of the pituitary gland. They present with headaches, visual disorders, or cranial nerve deficits. NFPAs can recur, progress, or present as residual tumors. We, therefore, conducted this review to compare the effects of both revision surgery and stereotactic surgery on tumor size, visual status, endocrine status, and complications. Methods: A systematic review of published literature on recurrent, residual, or progressing NFPAs that underwent redo surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery from the inception till June 2020 was conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Thirteen records (1209 patients) were included, and risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated from each study were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Results: Redo surgery was the preferred intervention in patients presenting with larger tumor sizes and was more effective in reducing the tumor size as compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (risk ratio [RR] 56.14; 95% CI, 16.45-191.58). There was more visual loss with revision surgery as compared to SRS (risk ratio [RR] 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.20). However, SRS was associated with fewer complications, such as new diabetes insipidus, as compared to the redo surgery (risk ratio [RR] 0.01; 95% CI 0.01-0.03). Conclusion: Redo surgery is the superior choice in the treatment of recurrent/residual or progressing NFPAs if the tumor size is large and an immediate reduction in tumor burden through debulking is warranted. However, redo surgery is associated with a higher risk of visual loss, new endocrinopathies, and other complications, in contrast to SRS.

Quantitative Analysis of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors Gene Expression Levels in Non-functioning Pituitary Tumors and Association with Clinical and Molecular Aggressiveness Features.

The primary treatment for non-functioning pituitary tumors (NFPTs) is surgery, but it is often unsuccessful. Previous studies have reported that NFPTs express receptors for somatostatin (SST1-5) and dopamine (DRDs) providing a rationale for the use of dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues. Here, we systematically assessed SST1-5 and DRDs expression by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in a large group of patients with NFPTs (n = 113) and analyzed their potential association with clinical and molecular aggressiveness features. SST1-5 expression was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry. SST3 was the predominant SST subtype detected, followed by SST2, SST5, and SST1. DRD2 was the dominant DRD subtype, followed by DRD4, DRD5, and DRD1. A substantial proportion of NFPTs displayed marked expression of SST2 and SST5. No major association between SSTs and DRDs expression and clinical and molecular aggressiveness features was observed in NFPTs.

Radiation techniques in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas.

Defining the role of radiation techniques in treatment of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas is a difficult task: indeed, studies reported in the literature on this topic can probably be counted on the fingers of one hand. To try to better define these roles, it is thus necessary to extrapolate based on anti-secretory and anti-tumor efficacy reported in studies on non-selected pituitary tumours, regardless of their pathological status and intrinsic aggressiveness. Generally, radiation techniques are delivered as part of a multimodal treatment, usually with the primary aim of controlling tumor volume. Side-effects need to be divided into short and long-term, also depending on the overall prognosis of the tumour, since hypopituitarism will likely appear in the majority of patients, extra-pituitary side-effects, which have been reported after a significant delay after the procedure, can only be considered in patients with less aggressive pituitary tumours. In this review, we will first detail the different modalities of radiation techniques and the inherent limits of each technique depending on the volume and the localization of the tumour. We will then discuss the anti-tumour and anti-secretory efficacy of radiation techniques in aggressive pituitary tumors, either as a single treatment or as part of a multimodal treatment. Finally we will discuss the technique-specific side-effects.

Pituitary tumors: epidemiology and clinical presentation spectrum.

Pituitary tumors (PTs) are a heterogeneous group of lesions of the central nervous system that are usually benign. Most of them occur sporadically, but 5% can do so within family syndromes, usually at a young age. There are differences by sex, age, race, and genetic factors in the prevalence of different tumor cell types and clinical presentation. Functioning-PTs (FPTs) are usually diagnosed earlier than non-functioning PTs (NFPTs). However, this depends on the PT type. Headaches and visual disturbances are the most frequent mass-effect symptoms, but seizures or hydrocephalus may also occur. Pituitary apoplexy is another possible mode of presentation, and it requires special attention because of its potential severity. PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and old age present a series of clinical peculiarities that must be taken into account when evaluating these patients. Ectopic PTs (EPTs) are uncommon and share the same clinical-epidemiological data as eutopic PTs, but, depending on their location, other types of clinical manifestations may appear. Silent PTs are often detected as an incidentaloma or due to neurologic symptoms related to mass-effect. Aggressive PTs and pituitary carcinomas (PCs), which are very rare, are characterized by multiple local recurrences and metastases, respectively. This review addresses the epidemiology and clinical presentation of PTs, from the classical hormonal and mass-effect symptoms to the different rare presentations, such as pituitary apoplexy, hydrocephalus, or diabetes insipidus. Moreover, special situations of the presentation of PTs are discussed, namely, PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and the elderly, EPTs, silent and aggressive PTs, and PCs.

Gonadotrofinomas: análisis multicéntrico y retrospectivo de 66 pacientes / Gonadotrophinomas: multicenter and retrospective analysis of 66 patients

Objetivo: Analizar la presentación clínica, radiológica, bioquímica y el comportamiento posquirúrgico de una cohorte de pacientes portadores de gonadotrofinomas. Pacientes y Métodos: Se evaluaron pacientes con gonadotrofinomas estudiados en nueve centros endocrinológicos de la ciudad de Bs.As. durante el período 1983 a 2003. El criterio de inclusión fue la inmunohistoquímica (IH) positiva para hormona luteinizante (LH), folículoestimulante (FSH) y/o alfa subunidad (ASU). Los adenomas plurihormonales fueron excluidos. Resultados: Fueron analizados 66 pacientes de 51,8 ± 12,1 (X +/- DS) años (39 varones). Los síntomas mas frecuentemente observados fueron las alteraciones visuales (72,8%), seguidas por el hipogonadismo y las cefaleas. El 10,6% se diagnosticaron en forma incidental. El 98,5% fueron macroadenomas, 56,9% de los cuales correspondieron a un estadio Hardy (EH) 3 y 29,6% a un EH 4. El tiempo de seguimiento fue de 47,8 meses (r: 5-168). El hipogonadismo definido bioquímicamente se presentó en el 82,4% de los pacientes. En su mayoría presentaban niveles bajos o inapropiadamente normales de gonadotrofinas, pero 4 mujeres y 3 varones presentaron niveles séricos elevados y disociados de FSH y LH. La hiperprolactinemia por desconexión fue observada en 45,2% de la población (X: 65.6 ng/ml r: 30-172). El hipopituitarismo se detectó en 25,7% de los casos. La cirugía fue transeptoesfenoidal (TSE) en 80%; una segunda operación fue realizada en el 28% de la población. La IH fue positiva por orden de frecuencia para LH, FSH y ASU o las 3 combinaciones. La evolución posquirúrgica evidenció mejoría en el campo visual (CV) en el 41%. La presencia de restos tumorales y/o recidiva fue del 84%. Se indicó radioterapia en 37% y la sustitución hormonal fue necesaria en el 65% de los pacientes.

The aim of our study was to describe the clinical-biochemical and radiologic presentation and the post surgery outcome in a cohort of patients with gonadotrophinomas. Patients were selected from nine Endocrinology Units of the city of Buenos Aires from 1983 at 2003. The inclusion criteria was defined by nonfunctinoning pituitary adenomas with positive innmunohistochemical (IH) for luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and/or alpha subunit (ASU). Innmunohistochemically plurihormonal adenomas were excluded. Sixty six patients were analyzed, aged 51,8 ± 12,1 (X +/- DS) years; (39 men). More prevalent symptoms were visual alterations (72,8%), hypogonadism and headaches. Eleven percent was diagnosed as incidentalomas. Ninety eight percent were macroadenomas, 56,9% was Hardy stage (HS) 3 and 29,6% was HS 4. The patients were followed up for 47,8 months (r: 5-168). Hypogonadism was biochemically found in 82,4%. The majority showed low or inappropriately normal levels of gonadotrophins except for 4 women and 3 men that had high and dissociated levels. Hyperprolactinemia was observed in 45,2% and was interpreted as an interference with normal dopamine inhibition of prolactin secretion (X+/-DS: 65.6+/- ng/ml, r: 30-172). Hypopituitarism was found in 25,7% of the patients. Transsphenoidal surgery was carried out in 80% and in 28% a second surgery was needed. The IH was positive for LH, FSH and ASU in this order of frequency or its combinations. Tumor persistency and/or recurrency were found in 84% of the patients. Forty one percent showed improvement of visual defects. Radiotherapy was indicated in 37% and hormonal replacement was needed in 65% of the patients.