The short-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-weekly dulaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Colombian adults.

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent disease worldwide and in Colombia, representing one of the main causes of death and placing a considerable burden on healthcare systems. 13 classes of drugs are approved for the treatment of T2DM, with Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists being a first-line treatment option for patients with or at high risk of certain cardiovascular diseases and chronic kidney disease. The objective of this study is to conduct a short-term cost-effectiveness analysis of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-weekly dulaglutide in Colombian adults with T2DM, from a third-party payer perspective. Methods: Numbers needed to treat were calculated for different single and composite endpoints of the SUSTAIN 7 trial, annual costs for once weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg were extracted from the public SISMED database. With these inputs a cost of control model was developed, to obtain the annual cost of bringing one T2DM patient to relevant clinical outcomes by using semaglutide or dulaglutide. Results: Semaglutide was considered cost-effective compared to dulaglutide across all pre-specified endpoints, even in the different scenarios evaluated in the sensitivity analyses, and in a particularly pronounced manner for weight loss outcomes. Semaglutide at a dose of 1.0 mg once-weekly was cost-effective compared to dulaglutide 1.5 mg across all outcomes in the short-term, making it an appropriate first-line choice in the treatment of T2DM when deciding between these two GLP-1 receptor agonists. Conclusions: This is the first short-term cost-effectiveness study of semaglutide and dulaglutide in T2DM Colombian patients. Our modeled results suggest that once-weekly semaglutide represents a cost-effective option for treating individuals with T2DM in Colombia who are not achieving glycaemia control with metformin, and it would be expected to improve HbA1C, promote greater weight loss and reduce costs from a third-payer perspective compared with treatment with dulaglutide.

Avaliação econômica de uma estratégia individual de empoderamento farmacoterapêutico: um modelo em longo prazo aplicado do diabetes mellitus tipo II / Economic evaluation of an individual pharmacotherapeutic empowerment strategy: an applied long-term model for type II diabetes mellitus

Objetivos: contribuir para a geração de dados de avaliação econômica de estratégias de empoderamento farmacoterapêutico para pacientes com Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM tipo 2). Métodos: este estudo farmacoeconômico é aninhado a um ensaio clínico com controle não randomizado que incluiu pacientes ≥18 anos de idade, cadastrados no HIPERDIA. Os pacientes foram alocados em um modelo de Markov conforme valores de hemoglobina glicada do acompanhamento. As probabilidades do surgimento de complicações relativas ao DM, incluindo-se óbito, foram estimadas por dez anos. Cada complicação do DM tipo 2 teve seu custo estabelecido para determinação do custo anual. Resultados: entre os participantes da intervenção, não ocorrem óbitos ocasionados por DM tipo 2, e a progressão de complicações mantém-se estável durante os anos simulados, enquanto, no grupo controle, 60% dos pacientes podem evoluir para óbito nos dez anos, e a probabilidade de serem acometidos por complicações relacionadas ao DM tipo 2 é crescente. Com relação aos custos, ao final de dez anos, os pacientes que participaram da Estratégia Individual de Empoderamento Farmacoterapêutico (EIEF) tiveram um custo médio de UU$134,45 poupando a vida de 100% dos pacientes, e os pacientes do atendimento convencional um custo médio de UU$237,12 e 40% dos pacientes acompanhados chegariam ao final do ciclo com vida. Conclusão: a EIEF parece ser uma alternativa economicamente viável em longo prazo, bem como para a promoção do controle glicêmico.

Objectives: contribute to the data generation for the economic evaluation of pharmacotherapeutic empowerment strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (type 2 DM). Method: This pharmacoeconomic study is nested in a clinical trial with non-randomized control that included patients ≥18 years old, registered in HIPERDIA. The patients were allocated to a Markov model according to the follow-up glycated hemoglobin values. The probabilities of the appearance of complications related to DM, including death, have been estimated for ten years. Each complication of type 2 DM had its cost established to determine the annual cost. Results: Among the participants in the intervention, there are no deaths caused by type 2 DM, and the progression of complications remains stable during the simulated years, whereas in the control group, 60% of the patients can progress to death in ten years and the probability of being affected by complications related to type 2 DM is increasing. Regarding costs, at the end of ten years, patients who participated in Individual Pharmacotherapeutic Empowerment Strategy (IPES) had an average cost of US$ 134.45, saving 100% of patient's lives, and conventional care patients cost an average of US$ 237.12 and 40% of the patients followed would reach the end of the life cycle. Conclusion: The IPES seems like an economically viable and long-term economic alternative and promotes glycemic control.

Cost-minimization Analysis of Ranibizumab versus Aflibercept in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: In 2020 Colombia may expect to have close to 231,700 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Treatment of neovascular ARMD involves the sequential Intra-vitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF therapy) medications. The efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF therapy on a treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing scheme are similar when ranibizumab or aflibercept are administered. Objective : A cost-minimization analysis from the payer`s perspective in Colombia projects treatment expenses of anti-VEGF therapy using aflibercept or ranibizumab on T&E regimens for the treatment of neovascular ARMD. Methods : A model projects the expenses of the compared treatment regimens for two and five-year periods beginning on February 2020. The model used information from clinical trials, case series and meta-analyses on the compared treatment regimens, demographic, epidemiologic and economic data originated from the Colombian government sources. A 3% discount rate was applied. Results : Projected cost differences in favor of ranibizumab after two and five-year treatment periods beginning February 2020 could be close to U.S. $ 4,861 and U.S $ 7,241 per treated eye, respectively. If all patients with unilateral and bilateral neovascular ARMD in Colombia were to receive appropriate anti-VEGF therapy for two years, the projected expected cost difference in favor of ranibizumab could be close to U.S. $ 462,717,092 dollars. Conclusion : Within the Colombian healthcare setting anti-VEGF therapy on a T&E regimen utilizing ranibizumab for neovascular ARMD may be cost-saving compared with employing aflibercept. Despite cost favorability, ranibizumab should not be the only therapeutic option since in clinical practice alternatives are required.

Pharmacoeconomic study comparing carbetocin with oxytocin for the prevention of hemorrhage following cesarean delivery in Lima, Peru.

Postpartum hemorrhage is one of the main causes of maternal death. Oxytocin has traditionally been used to prevent postpartum hemorrhage. AIM: To compare oxytocin with carbetocin, a long-acting analog of oxytocin, for prevention of uterine hemorrhage after cesarean delivery. MATERIALS & METHODS: Clinical data were retrieved from the 2012 Cochrane meta-analysis "Carbetocin for preventing postpartum hemorrhage". A decision tree was constructed. The direct costs were those of medications from the Peruvian official price list (DIGEMID). Costs associated with additional oxytocic drugs, blood transfusions, postpartum hemorrhage kits and hysterectomy were obtained from Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. The perspective of the study was that of the payer. The time horizon for calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was 1 year (2015). RESULTS: Patients who received carbetocin required fewer additional uterotonic agents, had fewer hemorrhages and received fewer blood transfusions. Therefore, the costs associated with these interventions were lower. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was S/. 49,918 per QALY gained, which is lower than the threshold we estimated for Peru. CONCLUSION: Carbetocin is more cost-effective than oxytocin for prevention of uterine hemorrhage after cesarean delivery.

Evaluación de la calidad de estudios farmacoeconómicos del uso de los inhibidores de la bomba de protones en enfermedad ácido péptica / Quality assessment of pharmacoeconomic studies of the use of proton pump inhibitors in peptic ulcer disease

Los inhibidores de la bomba de protones (IBP) son un grupo de fármacos que reducen la secreción de ácido en el estómago, por lo que son ampliamente utilizados en el tratamiento de la úlcera péptica. La notable prevalencia e incidencia de esta patología sugiere que los recursos económicos y humanos dedicados a su tratamiento son considerables y, por tanto, es necesario identificar fuentes fiables de información relacionadas con los costos y los beneficios de estos agentes terapéuticos que permitan valorarlos en términos de eficiencia para mejorar su prescripción racional. Este trabajo realizó una revisión de los estudios farmacoeconómicos correspondientes al uso de los ibp en la prevención y tratamiento de la enfermedad ácido péptica y se presenta una evaluación pareada de la calidad metodológica de la bibliografía basada en el instrumento qhes (Ofman et al., [10]). De los diez artículos revisados, cuatro son de costo-efectividad, dos de costo-utilidad, tres de descripción de costos y uno de minimización de costos. El puntaje global promedio obtenido por los estudios evaluados fue de 66,6 sobre 100. Cuatro de ellos puntuaron por debajo de 60, haciendo evidente deficiencias en la calidad de los estudios de acuerdo con el instrumento usado, además pone de manifiesto que se necesitan evaluaciones farmacoeconómicas en relación con el uso de los ibp para la prevención y el tratamiento de la úlcera péptica, especialmente estudios de costo-efectividad, que cumplan con los estándares de calidad metodológica.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are a group of drugs that reduce gastric acid secretion and therefore are widely used in the treatment of peptic ulcer. The remarkable prevalence and incidence of this disease suggests that economic and human resources devoted to treatment are considerable and therefore it is necessary to identify reliable sources of information related to the costs and benefits of these therapeutic agents to appraise in terms of efficiency to improve rational prescribing. This paper conducted a review of pharmacoeconomic studies pertaining to the use of ppi in the prevention and treatment of peptic acid disease, as it presents a paired assessment of methodological quality of the literature instrument based on qhes (Ofman et al., [10]). Of the ten articles reviewed, four were cost-effectiveness, two cost-utility, three description of cost, and one of cost minimization. The average overall scored 66.6 out of 100. Four of them scored below 60.0, making it a clear need for pharmacoeconomic evaluations in connection with the use of ppi for prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer, especially cost-effectiveness studies that meet standards of methodological quality.