Load carriage does not reduce absolute mechanical power output but reduces agility in elite military police officers.

Objectives. The main objective of this study was to evaluate mean propulsive velocity (MPV), mean propulsive force (MPF) and mean propulsive power (MPP) in elite police officers under LOADED and UNLOADED conditions. The study also investigated the association of body composition and strength levels under the same load conditions. Methods. Twenty-one men from an elite unit in Brazil participated in the study, performing Smith machine half squats and an agility test. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measured body composition; a linear encoder measured MPV, MPF and MPP during the half squats; and a manual chronometer registered agility test performance. Results. The results showed that wearing and carrying occupational loads did not alter the squat exercise's MPP, MPV and MPF but reduced the performance of relative MPP and agility (p < 0.05). The results also showed that MPP had a higher association with force (i.e., MPF and one-repetition maximum [1RM]) than velocity (i.e., MPV and agility) under the LOADED condition (p < 0.05). Among the body composition variables, only lean body mass was associated with MPP under the LOADED condition (p < 0.05). Conclusion. These findings suggest that load carriage does not reduce absolute mechanical power output, but reduces the relative MPP and agility in military police officers.

A Microcost Analysis of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment During and Before the COVID-19 Pandemic From a Hospital Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the direct cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) used during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of a Brazilian tertiary public hospital. METHODS: We evaluated the cost of PPE during the pandemic to the cost before (2021 vs 2019, respectively) using the microcosting method. Cost estimates were converted into US dollars in 2023, taking inflation into account and using purchasing power parity conversion rates. Our expenses included gloves, disposable gowns, head coverings, masks, N95 respirators, and eye protection. The number of PPE used was determined by the hospital's usual protocol, the total number of hospitalized patients, and the number of days of hospitalization. We used the following variables for uncertainty analysis: PPE adherence, an interquartile range of median length of hospitalization, and variance in the cost of each PPE. RESULTS: In 2021, 26 618 individuals were hospitalized compared with 31 948 in 2019. The median length of stay was 6 and 4 days, respectively. The total and per-patient direct cost of PPE were projected to be 2 939 935.47 US dollar (USD) and 110.45 USD, respectively, during the pandemic, and 1 570 124.08 USD and 49.15 USD, respectively, before the pandemic. The individual cost of PPE was the most influential cost variable. CONCLUSIONS: According to the hospital's perspective, the total estimated direct cost of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic was nearly twice as high as the previous year. This difference might be explained by the 3-fold increase in PPE in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 compared with patients without isolation precautions.

Craniocervical Pain, Sleep Quality, Depressive Symptoms, and Physical Activity in Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: An increase in the workload and use of personal protective equipment by healthcare workers was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the connections between craniocervical structures, symptoms such as neck pain and temporomandibular symptoms could be influenced by the use of PPE. AIMS: To assess the prevalence of craniocervical pain, sleep quality, physical activity, and depressive symptoms and relationship among craniocervical symptoms in healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers. SETTINGS: An online questionnaire included a self-report of craniocervical pain intensity [orofacial pain, neck pain, and headache (Numerical Rating Scale)], sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire two items) and physical activity (self-report). METHODS: The sample analysis was performed by descriptive statistics, the paired t-test was used to compare symptoms intensity before and during the pandemic. The relationship between dependent and independent samples was assessed through McNemar test, Pearson's chi-squared test, and Student's independent t-test. A value of p < .05 was adopted as statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 147 participants replied the questionnaires. Headache, neck pain, and orofacial pain complaints increased during the pandemic in healthcare workers (p < 0.001). Craniocervical pain was correlated with poor sleep quality, probable depression, and physical activity during the pandemic (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Healthcare workers self-reported more craniocervical pain during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic. In addition, poor sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and physical inactivity were associated with craniocervical symptoms during this period.

Equipos de protección personal en odontología antes y después de la COVID-19

El uso de equipamientos de protección personal durante los tratamientos odontológicos garantiza la salud de profesionales y pacientes. Este trabajo tiene como propósito analizar, en la literatura científica, el conocimiento de estudiantes y profesionales de odontología sobre el uso de equipos de protección personal, antes y después de la pandemia COVID-19. Para ello se realizó una revisión integrativa en las bases de datos: Scielo, Pubmed, BVS y Web of Science, incluyendo artículos publicados entre agosto del 2010 y agosto del 2022. Fueron seleccionados 14 artículos, disponibles íntegramente en las bases de datos seleccionadas. Se excluyeron tesis, artículos de revisión, duplicados y aquellos donde la metodología no respondía al objetivo propuesto. En los 14 artículos seleccionados, el método para obtención de datos fue el cuestionario. Los estudios fueron realizados en Brasil, Yemen, Cuba, México, Líbano, Turquía, India, Londres, y Colombia. Seis estudios se realizaron antes de la pandemia y 8 de ellos después de su inicio. Todas las investigaciones evaluaban conocimientos, actitudes, prácticas y factores relacionados con el uso de equipos de protección personal. Se concluye que el uso de equipos de protección personal antes de la pandemia ya era una práctica esencial para garantizar la seguridad de profesionales, estudiantes y pacientes durante los procedimientos odontológicos; con la pandemia de COVID-19 nuevos protocolos fueron establecidos y con ellos nuevos equipamientos como el uso del protector facial y la mascarilla N95.

The use of personal protective equipment during dental treatments guarantees the professionals and patients' health. This researcher's purpose is to analyze in scientific literature the dental students and professionals' knowledge regarding the use of personal protective equipment, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. An integrative review was carried out in the databases: Scielo, Pubmed, BVS and Web of Science, including articles published between August 2010 and August 2022. 14 articles were selected, available in full in the selected databases. Theses, review articles, duplicates and those where the methodology did not respond to the proposed objective were excluded. In the 14 selected articles, the method for obtaining data was the questionnaire. The studies were carried out in Brazil, Yemen, Cuba, Mexico, Lebanon, Turkey, India, London, and Colombia. Six studies were carried out before the pandemic and 8 of them after its start. All researches evaluated knowledge, attitudes, practices and factors related to the use of personal protective equipment. It is concluded that the use of personal protective equipment before the pandemic was already an essential practice to guarantee the safety of professionals, students and patients during dental procedures; with the COVID-19 pandemic, new protocols were established and with them new equipment such as the use of the face shield and the N95 mask.

Assessment of buccal mucosa genotoxicity in insecticide-exposed urban fumigators in Cali, Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate cytogenetic damage in the buccal mucosa of non-exposed subjects (N = 33) and insecticide-exposed fumigators (N = 31) in the urban area of Cali, Colombia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through a questionnaire sociodemographic data, anthropometric measurements, state of health, and lifestyle were collected. Buccal micronucleus cytome (BMCyt) assay was using for evaluate cytogenetic damage. RESULTS: The study showed that all fumigators used adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and had low alcohol consumption. The authors did not find significant differences in BMCyt biomarkers between the groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed a 13% increase in micronucleus (MN) frequency for every year of increasing age (OR = 1.13, p = 0.029), and higher MN with the decrease in daily fruit consumption (OR = 4.71, p = 0.084), without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The results between groups could be related to healthy habits and PPE use among the subjects. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024;37(1):128-37.

Perception of personal protective equipment availability and mental health outcomes in workers from two national hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: During the first wave of the pandemic, a constant concern of healthcare workers, who are more vulnerable to contagion, is their personal safety. This is directly related to the availability of adequate PPE, which led to a perception of dissatisfaction and inequality with government responses. We aim t o determines whether perception of adequate PPE availability is associated with depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms in different types of healthcare workers. Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study surveyed clinical and non-clinical healthcare workers in two third-level hospitals in Lima, Peru. An online self-survey assessed the perception of adequate PPE availability, using a Likert scale question, which was then dichotomized for the analysis. In addition, we assessed the depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms using validated questionnaires. Results: 563 participants were included. In general, there is no association between perception of PPE availability and three mental health outcomes. However, in the subgroup analysis, physicians with better perception of PPE availability had less moderate-severe outcomes in mental health; in contrast, nurses had higher moderate-severe outcomes. The type of profession in healthcare workers may modify the effect of this association. Conclusion: The association between perception of PPE availability and mental health outcomes is complex in healthcare workers from two third-level hospitals. This association can vary according to the type of work.

Covid-19: fatores associados ao uso e adesão de equipamentos de proteção individual entre residentes no Brasil / Covid-19: factors associated with the use and adherence of personal protective equipment in Brazil among residents / Covid-19: factores asociados al uso y adherencia de equipos de protección personal entre los residentes en Brasil

Objetivo: analisar os fatores associados ao uso e a adesão aos equipamentos de proteção individual pelos profissionais pós-graduandos vinculados a programas de residência em saúde. Método: transversal com 227 residentes. Avaliadas variáveis relacionadas à adesão e uso adequado de equipamentos de proteção individual por meio de instrumento validado "E.P.I. covid-19 Brasil-versão adaptada para residentes". Realizou-se análise bivariada, teste qui-quadrado/exato de Fisher e cálculo da razão de prevalência. Pesquisa foi aprovada pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa com Seres Humanos. Resultados: realizaram atividades de capacitação sobre EPIs (59,9%).Associação entre uso de máscara cirúrgica(p≤0,01) e idade; área de concentração do programa e uso de gorro (p≤0,01) e máscara cirúrgica (p=0,04); realização de atividades de capacitação e uso de máscara cirúrgica (p=0,02) e N95 (p≤0,01). A adesão variou de 0% a 67%. Conclusão: fatores associados ao uso adequado, idade, área de concentração do programa e realização de atividades de capacitação. Houve fragilidades na adesão. Sugere-se o fortalecimento do tema biossegurança na residência.

Objective: to analyze the factors associated with the use and adherence to personal protective equipment by graduate professionals linked to residency programs in health. Method: cross-sectional study with 227 residents. E.P.I.covid-19 Brasil-adapted version for residents". Bivariate analysis, Fisher chi-square/exact test and calculation of the prevalence ratio were performed. Research was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Human Beings. Results: they carried out training activities on PPE (59.9%). Association between use of surgical mask (p≤0.01) and age; program concentration area and use of cap (p≤0.01) and surgical mask (p=0.04); performance of training activities and use of surgical mask (p=0.02) and N95 (p≤0.01). Adherence to PPE ranged from 0% to 67%. Conclusion: factors associated with the proper use of personal protective equipment were age, area of program concentration, and performance of training activities. There were weaknesses in adherence. It is suggested to strengthen the theme of biosafety in the residence.

Objetivos:analizar los factores asociados al uso y la adherencia a los equipos de protección personal (EPP) por parte de profesionales graduados vinculados a programas de residencia en salud. Método: estudio transversal con 227 residentes. Se utilizó la versión adaptada para residentes del «Cuestionario sobre EPI en la atención primaria de salud (EPS-APS) en el contexto de la COVID-19 en Brasil. Se realizaron análisis bivariados, prueba chi-cuadrado de Fisher/prueba exacta y cálculo de la razón de prevalencia. La investigación fue aprobada por el Comité de Ética para la Investigación con Seres Humanos. Resultados: se realizaron actividades de capacitación sobre EPI (59,9%). Se observó asociación entre el uso de mascarilla quirúrgica (p≤0,01) y la edad; área de concentración del programa y uso de cofia (p≤0,01) y mascarilla quirúrgica (p=0,04); realización de actividades de capacitación y uso de mascarilla quirúrgica (p=0,02) y N95 (p≤0,01). La adherencia a los EPI osciló entre el 0% y el 67%. Conclusión: los factores asociados al uso correcto de los EPI fueron la edad, el área de concentración del programa y la realización de actividades de capacitación. Se observaron debilidades en la adherencia. Se sugiere fortalecer el tema de la bioseguridad en la residencia.

Medidas de proteção contra a COVID-19: impactos comunicativos, sociais e emocionais em usuários de aparelhos de amplificação sonora individual / Protective measures against COVID-19: communicative, social and emotional impacts on hearing aids users

RESUMO Objetivo investigar os impactos comunicativos, sociais e emocionais gerados pela adoção de medidas protetivas contra a COVID-19 e associá-los ao grau da perda auditiva e ao tempo de uso dos aparelhos de amplificação sonora individual. Métodos estudo transversal e quantitativo, com 72 indivíduos, divididos em adultos e idosos, com perda auditiva bilateral, de grau até moderadamente severo, protetizados antes da pandemia em um programa público de saúde auditiva e que mantiveram uso efetivo dos dispositivos. Os sujeitos foram convidados a participar do estudo enquanto aguardavam consulta. Os prontuários foram acessados, a fim de coletar informações sobre o perfil audiológico e adaptação/uso dos aparelhos de amplificação sonora individual. Em sala silenciosa, foi aplicado, oralmente, protocolo contendo questões objetivas e os dados foram tabulados e submetidos aos testes estatísticos Igualdade de Duas Proporções e Qui-Quadrado. Resultados nos dois grupos, um número significativo de usuários teve a comunicação impactada pelo uso de máscaras e pelo distanciamento físico, predominando, entre os adultos, a dificuldade com as tecnologias digitais (celulares/computadores), enquanto nas videochamadas, os prejuízos comunicativos foram mais experenciados pelos idosos. Os empecilhos comunicativos e sociais existiram, independentemente do perfil audiológico e do tempo de uso dos dispositivos. Quando questionados se deixaram de se comunicar e se as medidas afetaram a sua vida social, as respostas ficaram divididas entre "sim/às vezes" e "não". Quanto ao impacto emocional das medidas protetivas, constatou-se maior repercussão entre os adultos. Conclusão as medidas protetivas afetaram a comunicação dos usuários de aparelhos de amplificação sonora individual, porém, não desencorajaram as trocas comunicativas e as interações sociais de, aproximadamente, metade da amostra, sendo o impacto emocional mais evidente nos adultos. Tais dificuldades não estiveram relacionadas ao perfil audiológico e uso diário dos dispositivos.

ABSTRACT Purpose to investigate the communicative, social, and emotional impacts generated by adopting protective measures against COVID-19 and associate them with the degree of hearing loss and the time of use of hearing aids. Methods cross-sectional quantitative study, with 72 individuals, divided into adults and older adults, with bilateral hearing loss up to moderately severe degree, users of hearing aids fitted before the pandemic in a public hearing health program who had maintained effective use of the devices. The participants were invited to participate in the study while waiting for an appointment and signed the consent form. After that, medical records were accessed to collect information about audiological profiles and the fitting/use of hearing aids. Afterward, a protocol with objective questions was orally applied in a silent room. Data were tabulated and subjected to Equality of Two Proportions and Chi-Square statistical tests. Results in both groups, a significant number of users had communication impacted by the use of masks and by social distancing, with difficulty with digital technologies (cell phones/computers) predominating among adults, while older adults more commonly experienced communicative impairments during video calls. The communicative impediment existed regardless of the audiological profile and device use time. When asked if they stopped communicating and if the measures affected their social life, the sample was divided between "yes/sometimes" and "no". As for the emotional impact of protective measures, there was a greater impact among adults. Conclusion protective measures affected the communication of hearing aids users but did not discourage communicative exchanges and social interactions for approximately half of the sample, with the emotional impact being more evident in adults. Such difficulties were not related to the audiological profile and daily use of the devices.

COVID-19 and Personal Protective Equipment-Related Challenges Faced by Pediatric Dentists during patient care: A Qualitative Study

Abstract Objective: To describe the challenges pediatric dentists face while caring for their patients during the pandemic. Material and Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with purposefully sampled pediatric dentists. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews until the content of the collected data reached theoretical saturation. Data were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using content analyses. Results: Seven participants (four females and three males) between 29 and 50 years participated in the study. Three themes emerged from the analyses: Anxiety and fear; PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and its impact on care delivery; and 3) Behavior management. Conclusion: Dental care delivery was challenging for pediatric dentists. They experienced high anxiety levels and modified their services according to the recommended guidelines while making accommodations to lessen patients' COVID-19-related anxiety. The additional mandated PPE use affected the communication between the dentists and their patients, affecting their dentist-patient bonding.

Reuse of N95/PFF2 masks in clinical practice: morphological and structural analysis / Reutilización de mascarillas N95/PFF2 en la práctica clínica: análisis morfológico y estructural / Reutilização das máscaras N95/PFF2 na prática clínica: análise morfológica e estrutural

Objective: to analyze the integrity of N95/PFF2 masks in relation to fiber morphology, porosity, cracks and micro holes, as well as identify visible damage to their structure and components, after seven- and fifteen-day reuse protocols. Method: cross-sectional study. Structural and morphological characteristics of a new N95/PFF2 mask were analyzed in comparison with N95/PFF2 masks (n=10) used in seven- and fifteen-day protocols, through visual inspection and scanning electron microscopy. Results: upon visual inspection, following the seven-day protocol, 40% and 60% of the N95/PFF2 masks showed, respectively, personal identification marks and external and internal dirt. Additionally, 20% exhibited loosening and/or tearing of the straps, while 100% showed some type of damage to the nose clips. In the fifteen-day protocol, all N95/PFF2 masks had dirt, loose straps and damaged nose clips, and 80% had folds. Electronic microscopy revealed an increase in pores and loosening in the weaves from seven days onwards, extending up to fifteen days, with the presence of micro holes and residues. Conclusion: the reuse of N95/PFF2 masks affects their structural and morphological integrity. It is crucial to carry out tests to measure the impact of this practice on the safety of health professionals.

Objetivo: analizar la integridad de mascarillas N95/PFF2 con relación a la morfología de las fibras, porosidad, grietas y microagujeros, así como identificar daños visibles en su estructura y componentes, luego de protocolos de reutilización de siete y quince días. Método: estudio transversal. Se analizaron las características estructurales y morfológicas de una mascarilla N95/PFF2 nueva en comparación con las mascarillas N95/PFF2 (n=10) utilizadas en protocolos de siete y quince días, mediante inspección visual y microscopía electrónica de barrido. Resultados: tras la inspección visual, siguiendo el protocolo de siete días, el 40% y el 60% de las mascarillas N95/PFF2 mostraron, respectivamente, marcas de identificación personal y suciedad externa e interna. Además, el 20% presentó aflojamiento y/o desgarro de las correas de sujeción, mientras que el 100% presentó algún tipo de daño en los clips nasales. En el protocolo de quince días, todas las mascarillas N95/PFF2 tenían suciedad, correas de sujeción sueltas y clips nasales dañados, y el 80% tenía pliegues. La microscopía electrónica reveló un aumento de poros y aflojamiento en las tramas a partir de los siete días, extendiéndose hasta los quince días, con presencia de microagujeros y residuos. Conclusión: la reutilización de las mascarillas N95/PFF2 compromete su integridad estructural y morfológica. Es crucial realizar pruebas para medir el impacto de esta práctica en la seguridad de los profesionales de la salud.

Objetivo: analisar a integridade das máscaras N95/PFF2 em relação à morfologia das fibras, porosidade, fissuras e micro furos, bem como identificar danos visíveis em sua estrutura e componentes, após protocolos de reutilização de sete e quinze dias. Método: estudo transversal. Características estruturais e morfológicas de uma máscara N95/PFF2 nova foram analisadas em comparação com máscaras N95/PFF2 (n=10) utilizadas em protocolos de sete e quinze dias, por meio da inspeção visual e microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Resultados: na inspeção visual, seguindo o protocolo de sete dias, 40% e 60% das máscaras N95/PFF2 apresentaram, respectivamente, marcas de identificação pessoal e sujidades externas e internas. Além disso, 20% exibiram afrouxamento e/ou rompimento das tiras de fixação, enquanto 100% mostraram algum tipo de dano nos clipes nasais. No protocolo de quinze dias, todas as máscaras N95/PFF2 apresentavam sujidade, tiras de fixação frouxas e clipes nasais comprometidos; 80% possuíam dobras. A microscopia eletrônica revelou aumento dos poros e afrouxamento nas tramas a partir de sete dias, ampliando-se até quinze dias, com presença de micro furos e detritos. Conclusão: a reutilização das máscaras N95/PFF2 compromete a integridade estrutural e morfológica. É crucial realizar testes para mensurar o impacto dessa prática na segurança dos profissionais de saúde.

Association between skin injuries and the importance atributed to prevention by health professionals during the pandemic / Asociación entre lesión cutánea e la importancia atribuida a la prevención por los profesionales de la salud durante la pandemia / Associação entre lesão cutânea e importância atribuída à prevenção pelos profissionais de saúde na pandemia

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify the association between the occurrence of skin lesions due to the use of products and/or personal protective equipment and the importance attributed to preventive care among health professionals working on the front lines of the struggle against the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: Cross-sectional, analytical study, carried out between May and June 2020, with a convenience sample (n=398) of health workers from 10 professional categories. To verify the existence of an association between the occurrence of skin lesions and exposure variables, a Contingency Table was used to obtain the Prevalence Ratio and respective Confidence Intervals. Results: 260 (65.3%) participants self-declared the development of skin lesions, predominantly nurses (53.8%), women (54.0%), from public institutions (52.8%), characterized by pressure injuries (37.3%), contact/allergic dermatitis (25.8%), or both lesions simultaneously (16.5%). More than half of professionals (53.5%) used preventive products, mainly moisturizers (51.0%). Conclusion: There was probability of an association between professionals who attributed less importance to the predictor "Protocol for proper product PPE and products" and the risk of skin injuries.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Verificar la asociación entre la aparición de lesiones cutáneas por el uso de productos y/o equipos de protección personal y la importancia atribuida al cuidado preventivo entre los profesionales de la salud que trabajaran en la primera línea de defensa contra la pandemia de la COVID-19. Método: Estudio analítico transversal, realizado entre mayo y junio de 2020, con una muestra por conveniencia (n=398) de profesionales de la salud de 10 categorías profesionales. Para verificar la existencia de asociación entre la aparición o no de lesiones cutáneas y las variables de exposición, se utilizó una Tabla de Contingencia para obtener el Índice de Prevalencia y los respectivos Intervalos de Confianza. Resultados: 260 (65,3%) participantes declararon el desarrollo de lesiones cutáneas, predominantemente enfermeras (53,8%), mujeres (54,0%), de instituciones públicas (52,8%), caracterizadas por lesiones por presión (37,3%), de dermatitis contacto/alérgicas (25,8%) y ambas lesiones simultáneamente (16,5%). Más de la mitad de los profesionales (53,5%) utilizan productos preventivos, principalmente hidratantes (51,0%). Conclusión: Hubo probabilidad de asociación de riesgo entre la aparición de lesiones cutáneas y la atribución de menor importancia al factor predictor "Protocolo para el uso adecuado de productos y EPP".

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar a associação entre ocorrência de lesão cutânea por uso de produtos e/ou equipamentos de proteção individual e importância atribuída aos cuidados preventivos entre profissionais de saúde atuantes na linha de frente durante a pandemia da Covid-19. Método: Estudo transversal, analítico, realizado entre maio e junho de 2020, com uma amostra por conveniência (n=398) de profissionais de saúde de 10 categorias profissionais. Para verificar a existência de associação entre a ocorrência ou não de lesão de pele e as variáveis de exposição utilizou-se Tabela de Contingência para obter a Razão de Prevalência e respectivos Intervalos de Confiança. Resultados: 260 (65,3%) participantes autodeclararam desenvolvimento de lesões na pele, predominando enfermeiros (53,8%), mulheres (54,0%), provenientes de instituições públicas (52,8%), caracterizadas por lesões por pressão (37,3%), dermatite de contato/alérgica (25,8%), e ambas as lesões de forma simultânea (16,5%). Mais da metade dos profissionais (53,5%) usou produtos preventivos, principalmente hidratantes (51,0%). Conclusão: Ocorreu probabilidade de associação de risco entre a ocorrência de lesão de pele e a menor importância atribuída ao fator preditor Protocolo para uso adequado de produtos e EPIs.

Adherence to standard precautions in university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed study / Cumplimiento de las precauciones estándar en hospitales universitarios durante la pandemia de COVID-19: un estudio mixto / Adesão às precauções padrão em hospitais universitários na pandemia de COVID-19: estudo misto

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze adherence to standard precautions by healthcare professionals and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian university hospitals. Method: Multicenter study, with a mixed approach, with a concomitant incorporated strategy and a sample of 559 health professionals and 53 managers from five university hospitals in Southern Brazil. Data collected online from September 2020 to October 2021 with the Instrument of Variables Related to Standard Precautions and sociodemographic and pandemic-related variables. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test) and content analysis were performed. Results: High level of adherence to standard precautions, with a significant association with having children (p = 0.014); COVID area (p < 0.001), biosafety training (p = 0.018), and social distancing (p < 0.001). The testimonies demonstrated a high risk perception and search for the use of protective equipment and biosafety knowledge. Conclusion: High adherence to standard precautions, associated with having children, working in COVID-19 care units, receiving biosafety guidance/training at the institution and practicing social distancing.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar la adherencia a las precauciones estándar por parte de los profesionales de la salud y los factores asociados durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en hospitales universitarios brasileños. Método: Estudio multicéntrico, con enfoque mixto, estrategia incorporada concomitante y muestra de 559 profesionales de la salud y 53 gestores de cinco hospitales universitarios del sur de Brasil. Datos recopilados en línea de septiembre de 2020 a octubre de 2021 con el Instrumento de Variables Relacionadas con Precauciones Estándar y variables sociodemográficas y relacionadas con la pandemia. Se realizaron análisis estadísticos descriptivos e inferenciales (prueba de Mann-Whitney y Kruskal-Wallis) y análisis de contenido. Resultados: Alto nivel de adherencia a las precauciones estándar, con asociación significativa con tener hijos (p = 0,014); área COVID (p < 0,001), capacitación en bioseguridad (p = 0,018) y distanciamiento social (p < 0,001). Los testimonios indican una alta percepción de riesgo y búsqueda del uso de equipos de protección y conocimientos de bioseguridad. Conclusión: Alto cumplimiento de las precauciones estándar, asociadas con tener hijos, trabajar en unidades de atención de COVID-19, recibir orientación/capacitación en bioseguridad en la institución y practicar el distanciamiento social.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a adesão às precauções padrão por profissionais da saúde e os fatores associados durante a pandemia de COVID-19 em hospitais universitários brasileiros. Método: Estudo multicêntrico, de abordagem mista, com estratégia incorporada concomitante e amostra de 559 profissionais da saúde e 53 gestores de cinco hospitais universitários do Sul do Brasil. Coleta de dados realizada de setembro de 2020 a outubro de 2021, online, com o Instrumento de Variáveis Relativas às Precauções Padrão, variáveis sociodemográficas e relacionadas à pandemia. Realizada análise estatística descritiva e inferencial (teste de Mann-Whitney e Kruskal-Wallis) e análise de conteúdo. Resultados: Alto nível de adesão às precauções padrão, com associação significativa para ter filhos (p = 0,014); área COVID (p < 0,001), treinamento sobre biossegurança (p = 0,018) e distanciamento social (p < 0,001). Depoimentos demonstraram percepção de risco elevada e busca pela utilização de equipamentos de proteção e por conhecimentos relacionados à biossegurança. Conclusão: Alta adesão às precauções padrão, associada a ter filhos, trabalhar em unidades de atendimento à COVID-19, receber orientações/capacitação sobre biossegurança na instituição e realizar distanciamento social.

Infection and the use of personal protective equipment among Primary Health Care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic / Infecção e uso de equipamentos de proteção individual entre trabalhadores da Atenção Primária à Saúde durante a pandemia da COVID-19 / Infección y uso de equipos de protección individual entre trabajadores de la Atención Primaria de Salud durante la pandemia de COVID-19

Abstract Objective: to analyze the frequency and associated risk factors for COVID-19 infection and the availability of Personal Protective Equipment used by primary healthcare workers. Method: a cross-sectional study was conducted over six months in Rio Grande do Sul. Descriptive analysis was performed, with the comparison of independent samples using Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test (p<.05). Results: the study included 206 (27%) healthcare workers who presented COVID-19 symptoms. There was a statistical association for the following variables: availability of surgical masks (p=.003), seeking information on the correct use of personal protective equipment (p=.045), having attended people with flu-like syndrome (p=.024), and believing that the highest risk of contamination is when attending a patient positive for coronavirus disease (p=.001). Conclusion: the availability of personal protective equipment is indispensable for COVID-19 prevention, with special emphasis on the use of surgical masks. Furthermore, the study highlighted the importance of providing Personal Protective Equipment in conjunction with guidance on its use.

Resumo Objetivo: analisar a frequência e os fatores de risco associados à infecção por COVID-19 e a disponibilidade de Equipamentos de Proteção Individual utilizados por trabalhadores da atenção primária à saúde. Método: estudo transversal, com duração de seis meses, realizado no Rio Grande do Sul. Para a análise, realizou-se a análise descritiva, com comparação de amostras independentes pelo teste de Qui-quadrado de Pearson e Exato de Fisher (p<0,05). Resultados: participaram do estudo 206 (27%) trabalhadores da saúde que apresentaram sintomas de COVID-19. Verificou-se associação estatística para as variáveis disponibilidade da máscara cirúrgica (p=0,003), buscar informações sobre o uso correto dos equipamentos de proteção individual (p=0,045), ter atendido pessoas com síndrome gripal (p=0,024) e acreditar que o maior risco para contaminação é atender um paciente positivo para coronavirus disease (p=0,001). Conclusão: a disponibilidade de equipamentos de proteção individual é indispensável para prevenção contra a COVID-19, com especial ênfase na utilização da máscara cirúrgica. Além disso, o estudo apontou a importância de fornecer os Equipamentos de Proteção Individual de forma articulada com a orientação assistencial para o seu uso.

Resumen Objetivo: analizar la frecuencia y los factores de riesgo asociados a la infección por COVID-19 y la disponibilidad de Equipos de Protección Individual utilizados por los trabajadores de la atención primaria de salud. Método: estudio transversal, con duración de seis meses, realizado en Rio Grande do Sul. Para el análisis, se realizó análisis descriptivo, con comparación de muestras independientes mediante la prueba de Chi-cuadrado de Pearson y la prueba Exacta de Fisher (p<0,05). Resultados: participaron del estudio 206 (27%) trabajadores de la salud que presentaron síntomas de COVID-19. Se verificó asociación estadística para las variables disponibilidad de mascarilla quirúrgica (p=0,003), buscar información sobre el uso correcto del equipo de protección individual (p=0,045), haber atendido a personas con síndrome gripal (p=0,024) y creer que el mayor riesgo de contaminación es al atender a un paciente positivo a la enfermedad por coronavirus (p=0,001). Conclusión: la disponibilidad de equipos de protección individual es fundamental para prevenir la COVID-19, con especial énfasis en el uso de la mascarilla quirúrgica. Además, el estudio señaló la importancia de proporcionar Equipos de Protección Individual junto con orientaciones de cuidado para su uso.

Safety of nursing professionals and patient facing COVID-19 pandemic in critical care unit / Segurança dos profissionais de enfermagem e do paciente frente à pandemia da COVID-19 em unidades críticas / Seguridad de los profesionales de enfermería y del paciente ante la pandemia de COVID-19 en unidades críticas

Abstract Objective: to evaluate nursing professionals and patient safety culture during the professional performance in the care of suspected or infected patients with COVID-19. Method: a cross-sectional study carried out with 90 professionals from critical care units of two teaching hospitals. An instrument for sociodemographic characterization and health conditions was used, in addition to the constructs "Nursing professional and patient safety" and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Univariate analyzes were performed between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the characteristics of Nursing professionals, applying Kendell's correlation between the constructs. Results: the COVID-19 diagnosis presented a significant statistical difference between nursing professionals that worked for more than six years at the critical care unit (p=0.020) and the items of the construct "Nursing professional and patient safety" regarding the doubts about how to remove the personal protective equipment (p=0.013) and safety flow (p=0,021). The dimensions 2 (p=0.003), 3 (p=0.009), 4 (p=0.013), 6 (p<0.001), and 9 (p=0.024) of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture were associated with the accomplishment of training. Conclusion: a higher professional nursing experience time was associated with non-infection by COVID-19. The perception of the safety culture of the patient was related to the accomplishment of training.

Resumo Objetivo: avaliar a segurança dos profissionais de enfermagem e a cultura de segurança do paciente durante a atuação profissional no atendimento de pacientes suspeitos ou com COVID-19. Método: estudo transversal realizado com 90 profissionais de unidades críticas de dois hospitais-escola. Foi utilizado um instrumento para caracterização sociodemográfica e condições de saúde, além dos constructos "Segurança do profissional e do paciente" e Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Foram realizadas análises univariadas entre o diagnóstico de COVID-19 e as características dos profissionais, aplicando-se a correlação de Kendell entre os constructos. Resultados: o diagnóstico de COVID-19 apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os profissionais que trabalhavam há mais de seis anos na unidade (p=0,020) e os itens do constructo "Segurança do profissional e do paciente" referentes às dúvidas sobre como retirar o equipamento de proteção individual (p=0,013) e fluxo seguro (p=0,021). As dimensões 2 (p=0,003), 3 (p=0,009), 4 (p=0,013), 6 (p<0,001) e 9 (p=0,024) do Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture foram associadas à realização de treinamentos. Conclusão: maior tempo de experiência profissional do profissional de enfermagem esteve associado a não infecção por COVID-19. A percepção de cultura de segurança do paciente esteve relacionada à realização de treinamentos.

Resumen Objetivo: evaluar la seguridad de los profesionales de enfermería y la cultura de seguridad del paciente durante su actuación profesional en el cuidado de pacientes sospechosos o con COVID-19. Método: estudio transversal realizado con 90 profesionales de unidades críticas de dos hospitales universitarios. Se utilizó un instrumento de caracterización sociodemográfica y de condiciones de salud, además de los constructos "Seguridad del profesional y del paciente" y Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Se realizaron análisis univariados entre el diagnóstico de COVID-19 y las características de los profesionales y se aplicó la correlación de Kendell entre los constructos. Resultados: el diagnóstico de COVID-19 mostró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los profesionales que actuaron por más de seis años en la unidad (p=0,020) y los ítems del constructo "Seguridad del profesional y del paciente" referentes a dudas sobre cómo retirar el Equipo de Protección Personal (p=0,013) y flujo seguro (p=0,021). Las dimensiones 2 (p=0,003), 3 (p=0,009), 4 (p=0,013), 6 (p<0,001) y 9 (p=0,024) del Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture se asociaron a la realización de formación. Conclusión: mayor tiempo de experiencia profesional de enfermería se asoció con la no infección por COVID-19. La percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente se relacionó con la realización de entrenamiento.

Lesiones cutáneas asociadas con el uso de respiradores N95 en profesionales de la salud de Brasil durante 2020 / Skin lesions associated with the use of N95 respirators among health professionals in Brazil in 2020 / Lesões de pele associadas ao uso de respiradores N95 entre profissionais de saúde no Brasil em 2020

Objetivo: investigar la prevalencia de lesiones cutáneas y factores asociados con el uso de respiradores N95 en profesionales de la salud de Brasil. Método: estudio transversal realizado con 11.368 profesionales de la salud en el que se empleó un método de muestreo dirigido por encuestados adaptado para entornos en línea. Se ejecutaron análisis univariados y multivariados para investigar la asociación entre la variable "lesiones cutáneas por utilizar respiradores N95" y sexo, categoría profesional, lugar de trabajo, capacitación, diagnóstico de COVID-19 y disponibilidad de suficiente provisión de Equipo de Protección Personal de buena calidad. Resultados: la prevalencia de lesiones cutáneas fue del 61,8%. Las mujeres fueron 1,203 veces (IC 95%: 1,154-1,255) más propensas a desarrollar lesiones que los hombres. La probabilidad de lesiones cutáneas en psicólogos (RP=0,805; IC 95%: 0,678-0,956) y dentistas (RP=0,884; IC 95%: 0,788-0,992) fue menor en comparación con la encontrada en los profesionales de Enfermería. Los profesionales con diagnóstico positivo de COVID-19 y que trabajan en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos son más propensos a sufrir lesiones cutáneas (RP=1,074; IC 95%: 1,042-1,107); (RP=1,203; IC 95%: 1,168-1,241), respectivamente, Conclusión: la prevalencia de lesiones cutáneas causadas por utilizar respiradores N95 fue del 61,8% y estuvo asociada al sexo femenino, a la categoría profesional, al lugar de trabajo, a la capacitación, a diagnóstico de COVID-19 y a la disponibilidad de suficiente provisión de Equipo de Protección Personal de buena calidad.

Objective: to investigate the prevalence of skin lesions and factors associated with the use of N95 respirators among health professionals in Brazil. Method: cross-sectional study conducted with 11,368 health professionals using a respondent-driven sampling method adapted for online environments. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the association between the "skin lesions with the use of N95 respirators" variable and gender, professional category, workplace, training, COVID-19 diagnosis, and availability of sufficient and high-quality Personal Protective Equipment. Results: the prevalence of skin lesions was 61.8%. Women were 1.203 times (95% CI: 1.154-1.255) more likely to develop a lesion than men. The chances of skin lesions in psychologists (PR=0.805; 95% CI: 0.678-0.956) and dentists (PR=0.884; 95% CI: 0.788-0.992), were lower when compared to Nursing professionals. Professionals with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis and working in the Intensive Care Unit have an increased chance of presenting skin lesions (PR=1.074; 95% CI: 1.042-1.107); (PR=1.203; 95% CI: 1.168-1.241), respectively. Conclusion: the prevalence of skin lesions caused by the use of N95 respirators was 61.8% and was associated with female gender, professional category, workplace, training, COVID-19 diagnosis, and availability of sufficient and highquality Personal Protective Equipment.

Objetivo: investigar a prevalência de lesões de pele e fatores associados ao uso de respiradores N95 entre profissionais de saúde no Brasil. Método: estudo transversal realizado com 11.368 profissionais de saúde por meio de um método de amostragem dirigido por respondentes adaptado para ambientes online. Análises univariadas e multivariadas foram realizadas para investigar a associação entre a variável "lesão de pele com uso de respirador N95" e sexo, categoria profissional, local de trabalho, treinamento, diagnóstico de COVID-19 e disponibilidade suficiente de equipamentos de proteção individual de qualidade. Resultados: a prevalência de lesões cutâneas foi de 61,8%. As mulheres foram 1,203 vezes (IC 95%: 1.154-1.255) mais propensas a desenvolver uma lesão do que os homens. As chances de lesão de pele em psicólogos (RP=0,805; IC 95%: 0,678-0,956) e dentistas (RP=0,884; IC 95%: 0,788-0,992) foram menores quando comparados aos profissionais de Enfermagem. Profissionais com diagnóstico positivo para COVID-19 e que trabalham em Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos têm maior chance de apresentar lesões de pele (RP=1,074; IC 95%: 1,042-1,107); (RP=1,203; IC 95%: 1,168- 1,241), respectivamente. Conclusão: a prevalência de lesões de pele causadas pelo uso do respirador N95 foi de 61,8% e esteve associada ao sexo feminino, categoria profissional, local de trabalho, treinamento, diagnóstico de COVID-19 e disponibilidade suficiente de equipamentos de proteção individual de qualidade.

Uso da dupla proteção auditiva na atenuação do ruído ocupacional: uma revisão sistemática / Use of double hearing protection for occupational noise attenuation: a systematic review / El uso duplo de protecctores auditivos para la reducción del ruido ocupacional: una revisión sistemática

Introdução: A Perda Auditiva Induzida por Ruído (PAIR) está associada à contínua exposição ao ruído dentro do ambiente ocupacional, é a segunda doença mais recorrente entre os trabalhadores. Objetivo: Verificar a efetividade e benefício do uso da dupla proteção auditiva na atenuação do ruído ocupacional. Método: A busca de artigos científicos foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE (Pubmed), LILACS, SciELO, SCOPUS e WEB OF SCIENCE, sem restrição de idioma, período e localização. Para complementar e evitar viés de risco foi realizada uma busca por literatura cinzenta no Google Acadêmico. A revisão sistemática foi conduzida de acordo com as recomendações do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Análises (PRISMA). Estudos que pontuaram ≥ 6 pontos de acordo com o protocolo de pontuação qualitativa proposto por Pithon et al. (2015). Resultados: A dupla proteção auditiva deverá ser utilizada quando o protetor auditivo tipo concha ou plug não fornecerem atenuação suficiente para diminuir o ruído no ambiente laboral, contudo, a atenuação sonora pelos EPI auditivos pode ser um obstáculo à comunicação e localização espacial, principalmente aos trabalhadores que possuem algum grau de PAIR. Conclusão: o uso da dupla proteção auditiva pode ser uma estratégia considerável para proteção de perdas auditivas em ambientes controlados. Novos padrões sonoros para alarmes de alerta, prevendo o aviso de acidentes em ambiente ocupacional em que o uso combinado dos dispositivos auditivos utilizados em ambientes controlados e a implantação dos sinais de banda larga como sinal padrão poderão ser utilizados como estratégias de segurança coletiva. (AU)

Introduction: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) is associated with continuous exposure to noise within the occupational environment and is the second most common disease among workers. Objective: To verify the effectiveness and benefit of using double hearing protection in attenuating occupational noise. Search Strategy: The search for scientific articles was carried out in the MEDLINE (Pubmed), LILACS, SciELO, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE databases, without restriction of language, period and location. To complement and avoid risk bias, a search for gray literature was performed on Google Scholar. Methodology: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Studies that scored ≥ 6 points according to the qualitative scoring protocol proposed by Pithon et al. (2015). Results: Double hearing protection should be used when the use of a shell or plug type hearing protector does not provide enough attenuation to reduce noise in the work environment, but this sound attenuation by hearing PPE can be an obstacle to communication and spatial location, especially to workers who have some degree of PAIR. Conclusion: the use of double hearing protection can be a considerable strategy for protecting against hearing loss in controlled environments. New sound patterns for warning alarms, providing for the warning of accidents in an occupational environment where the combined use of hearing devices used in controlled environments and the implementation of broadband signals as a standard signal can be used as collective safety strategies. (AU)

Introdución: La pérdida de audición inducida por el ruido es associada com la exposición continua el lo ambiente de trabajo y es la segunda enfermedad más comum em los trabajadores. Objectivo: Verificar la eficácia y beneficio del doble uso de los protectores auditivos em la atenuación del ruído. Método: La revisión sistemática se realizó de acuerdo con las recomendaciones para revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis (PRISMA). Los estudios que obtuvieron ≥ 6 puntos según el protocolo de puntuación cualitativa propuesto por Pithon et al. (2015). Resultados: La protección auditiva doble és utilizada cuando el uso de un protector auditivo tipo concha o enchufe no proporciona la atenuación suficiente para reducir el ruido en el ambiente de trabajo, pero esta atenuación del sonido por los EPP auditivos puede ser un obstáculo para la comunicación y la ubicación espacial, especialmente para los trabajadores con perdida de audición. Conclusión: el uso de doble protección auditiva es una estrategia considerable en ambientes controlados y seguros. Nuevos padrones sonoros para alarmas de aviso de accidentes en un entorno laboral y la implementación de señales de banda ancha como señal estándar, pueden utilizarse como estrategias de seguridad colectiva.(AU)

Investigação sobre os métodos de assepsia e equipamentos de proteção individual utilizados por manicures e pedicures / Research on asepsy methods and personal protective equipment used by manicurs and pedicurers / Investigación sobre métodos de asepsia y equipos de protección individual utilizados por manicuras y pedicuras

Introdução: As atividades laborais de manicures e pedicures geram riscos de exposições acidentais aos patógenos vinculados ao sangue como vírus, fungos e bactérias, devido à falta de adesão às medidas de biossegurança, e procedimentos de esterilização acarretando riscos à saúde dos profissionais e clientes. Objetivo:Verificar os conhecimentos das manicures e pedicures sobre os métodos de limpeza e esterilização de materiais, o uso de equipamentos de proteção individual e doenças relacionadas à profissão. Metodologia:Estudo transversal de abordagem quantitativa, realizado entre Outubro de 2017 a Janeiro de 2018, com 22 participantes finais. Incluídos os maiores de 18 anos, ambos os sexos, experiência mínima de um ano e residir em Nova Floresta. A técnica para seleção da amostra foi snowball. Resultados: A limitação de conhecimento sobre os riscos laborais na exposição de agentes infectantes, a baixa adesão no uso de equipamentos de proteção individuale a falta de padronização no processo de descontaminação, limpeza, desinfecção e esterilização dos instrumentais estão associados ao potencial risco de contaminação por agentes infecciosos, e ao acometimento de doenças infectocontagiosas por manicures, pedicures e clientela. Conclusões:Existem fragilidades no conhecimento destes profissionais,a maioria expõe métodos de antissepsia precários, devido a falta de sistematização e padronização dos procedimentos de limpeza, descontaminação dos instrumentais e o uso de equipamentos de proteção individual, além do conhecimento da profissão ter sido adquirido informalmente (AU).

Introduction: The work activities of manicurists and pedicurists generate risks of accidental exposure to pathogens linked to the blood such as viruses, fungi and bacteria, due to the lack of adherence to biosafety measures, and sterilization procedures causing risks to the health of professionals and clients. Objective:To verify the knowledge of manicurists and pedicurists on methods of cleaning and sterilizing materials, the use of personal protective equipment and diseases related to the profession. Methodology: Cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach, carried out between October 2017 and January 2018, with 22 final participants. Included are those over 18 years of age, both sexes, with at least one year's experience and residing in Nova Floresta. The technique for sample selection was snowball.Results:Limited knowledge about occupational risks in the exposure of infectious agents, low adherence to the use of personal protective equipmentand the lack of standardization in the process of decontamination, cleaning, disinfection and sterilizationof instruments are associated with the potential risk of contamination by infectious agents, and the spread of infectious diseases by manicurists, pedicurists and clientele. Conclusions:There are weaknesses in the knowledge of these professionals, most expose precarious antisepsis methods, due to the lack of systematization and standardization of cleaning procedures, decontamination of instruments and the use of personal protective equipment, in addition to the knowledge of the profession having been acquired informally (AU).

Introducción: Las actividades laborales de manicuras y pedicuras generan riesgos de exposiciónaccidental a patógenos ligados a la sangre como virus, hongos y bacterias, debido al incumplimiento de medidas de bioseguridad y procedimientos de esterilización generando riesgos a la salud de profesionales y clientes. Objetivo:Verificar los conocimientos de manicuras y pedicuras sobre métodos de limpieza y esterilización de materiales, el uso de equipos de protección personal y enfermedades relacionadas con la profesión. Metodología:Estudio transversal de abordaje cuantitativo, realizado entre octubre de 2017 y enero de 2018, con 22 participantes finales. Se incluyen los mayores de 18 años, de ambos sexos, con experiencia mínima de un año y vivir en Nova Floresta. La técnica para la selección de la muestra fue la de bola de nieve. Resultados:El conocimiento limitado sobre los riesgos laborales en la exposición de agentes infecciosos, la baja adherencia al uso de equipo de protección personal y la falta de estandarización en el proceso de descontaminación, limpieza, desinfección y esterilización de instrumentos se asocian con el riesgo potencial de contaminación por agentes infecciosos, y la propagación de enfermedades infecciosas entre manicuras, pedicuras y clientela. Conclusiones:Existen debilidades en el conocimiento de estos profesionales, la mayoría expone métodos de antisepsia precarios, debido a la falta de sistematización y estandarización de los procedimientos de limpieza, descontaminación de los instrumentos y el uso de equipo de protección Personal,además de haber adquirido los conocimientos de la profesión informalmente (AU).

Knowledge and practice of radiation safety in Brazilian equine veterinarians are less than optimal: An online survey.

Exposure to ionizing radiation is an occupational risk for veterinarians due to the potential for carcinogenesis, reproductive disorders, cataracts, and hereditary genetic changes. This survey study aimed to identify the radiological protection practices routinely used by veterinarians who work with portable digital X-ray equipment in horses in Brazil and assess their knowledge regarding current legislation. A total of 120 voluntary participation questionnaires were sent to veterinarians who used portable digital radiographic equipment in horses nationwide. The frequencies of the answers were analyzed using the chi-square test and logistic regression models. Thirty-five veterinarians responded (29% response rate). Of these, there was a greater participation of professionals in public institutions (40%, 14/35, p < .001), with 69% from the southeast region (24/35, p < .001) and 69% (24/35, p = .028) being male. We found that self-employed veterinarians had a higher odds ratio (OR) (9.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.39-58.44]; p = .021) of not using personal protective equipment compared with those in professional public institutions. In addition, not knowing the current legislation Collegiate Directorate Resolution 611/22 was a potential risk factor for lower radiological protection (OR, 8.00; 95% CI, [0.79-81.33]; p = 0.079). In conclusion, findings indicated that Brazilian equine veterinarians generally do not adopt adequate radiological protection against ionizing radiation during radiographic examinations and have low knowledge of the current legislation. Results can be used as background for the formulation of specific radiation protection guidelines for veterinarians and incentive educational and training strategies to reduce risks inherent to occupational exposure.

The Impacts of Plastic Waste from Personal Protective Equipment Used during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The period from 2019 to 2022 has been defined by the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in an unprecedented demand for and use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). However, the disposal of PPE without considering its environmental impact and proper waste management practices has become a growing concern. The increased demand for PPE during the pandemic and associated waste management practices have been analyzed. Additionally, the discussion around treating these residues and exploring more environmentally friendly alternatives, such as biodegradable or reusable PPE, is crucial. The extensive use of predominantly non-degradable plastics in PPE has led to their accumulation in landfills, with potential consequences for marine environments through the formation of microplastics. Therefore, this article seeks to establish a connection between these issues and the Sustainable Development Goals, emphasizing the importance of efficient management aligned with sustainable development objectives to address these emerging challenges and ensure a more sustainable future.

Zinc Phosphide Poisoning: From A to Z.

Zinc phosphide is a rodenticide that is used in agricultural, urban and industrial environments in México. After ingestion, it reacts with hydrochloric acid, hydrolyzing into phosphine. It causes cellular hypoxia via mitochondrial toxicity, resulting in multiple organ dysfunction and death. There is no antidote or specific treatment for zinc phosphide toxicity. We present the case of a 45-year-old female who ingested zinc phosphide with suicidal intent. On arrival at the emergency department, she had multisystemic disorders. Supportive care, decontamination and antidotal therapy were initiated. Subsequently, she evolved to clinical improvement with a resolution of the biochemical abnormalities of tissue hypoperfusion. She was discharged on day 7 without complications. In this review, we provide updated therapeutic options and discuss their specific pathophysiological basis.