RESUMEN
Objetivo: analisar os registros perioperatórios baseados nas etapas de sistematização da assistência de enfermagem perioperatória em um hospital regional público do agreste de Pernambuco. Método: estudo transversal, descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, obtido com dados secundários, conduzido em um hospital público. A amostra foi composta por 276 prontuários de indivíduos que se submeteram a procedimentos anestésico-cirúrgicos, durante os meses de janeiro a maio de 2023. Utilizou-se a análise descritiva e inferencial. Resultados: a efetuação dos registros da sistematização da assistência de enfermagem perioperatória foi predominante na maioria do período perioperatório, com respectiva significância principalmente no pré-operatório. Conclusão: as atividades satisfatórias corresponderam à visita pré-operatória de enfermagem, histórico, diagnóstico e prescrição de enfermagem. Já as fragilidades identificadas destacaram-se a ausência de reservas sanguíneas, a verificação de alergia e a colocação de placa de eletrocautério, inserção de sonda vesical, a efetuação do controle de perdas sanguíneas, fisiológicas e secreção gástrica.
Objective: analyzing perioperative records based on the phases of systematization of perioperative nursing care in a public regional hospital in Pernambuco's harsh region. Method: a cross-sectional, descriptive study with a quantitative approach, using secondary data, conducted in a public hospital. The sample consisted of 276 medical records of individuals who underwent anesthetic-surgical procedures between January and May 2023. Descriptive and inferential analysis was used. Results: the recording of the systematization of perioperative nursing care was predominant in the majority of the perioperative period, with significance mainly in the preoperative period. Conclusion: the satisfactory activities corresponded to the preoperative nursing visit, history, diagnosis, and nursing prescription. The weaknesses identified were the lack of blood reserves, checking for allergies and placing the electrocautery plate, inserting a urinary catheter, controlling blood loss, physiological loss, and gastric secretion.
Objetivo: analizar los registros perioperatorios a partir de las etapas de sistematización de la atención de enfermería perioperatoria en un hospital público regional de la zona rural de Pernambuco. Método: estudio descriptivo transversal, con enfoque cuantitativo, a partir de datos secundarios, realizado en un hospital público. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 276 historias clínicas de personas sometidas a procedimientos anestésico-quirúrgicos, de enero a mayo de 2023. Se utilizó análisis descriptivo e inferencial. Resultados: el registro de la sistematización de la atención de enfermería perioperatoria predominó en la mayor parte del periodo perioperatorio, con significación principalmente en el periodo preoperatorio. Conclusión: las actividades satisfactorias correspondieron a la visita de enfermería preoperatoria, registro, diagnóstico y prescripción de enfermería. Las debilidades identificadas incluyeron falta de reservas de sangre, comprobación de alergias y colocación de placa de electrocauterio, inserción de sonda vesical, control de la pérdida de sangre, fisiológica y secreción gástrica.
RESUMEN
Negative past experiences with vaccines or unfamiliar environments can be sources of stress during the COVID-19 vaccination procedure. We examined whether the perceived stressfulness of the vaccination procedure differ between mass vaccination centers and general practitioner (GP) practices. A survey was distributed (07/2021-10/2021) among newly vaccinated individuals in ten GP practices (n = 364) and two vaccine centers (n = 474). Stress was low at all sites. The perceived stressfulness of the procedure was higher among younger participants and those in GP practices, and increased with longer waiting time at the site. Stress decreased with better comprehensibility of the procedure and higher satisfaction with patient education. Participants who expressed greater concern about the health risks of COVID-19 vaccines perceived the vaccination procedure as more stressful. Our findings indicate opportunities for improvements in future vaccination campaigns and highlight the important role of healthcare providers in mitigating stress by addressing individual concerns.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pharmaceutical interventions are proposals made by hospital clinical pharmacists to address sub-optimal uses of medications during prescription review. Pharmaceutical interventions include the identification of drug-related problems, their prevention and resolution. The objective of this study was to exploit a newly developed deep neural network classifier to identify drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions and perform a large retrospective descriptive analysis of them in a French university hospital over a 3-year period. METHODS: Data were collected from prescription support software from 2018 to 2020. A classifier running in Python 3.8 and using Keras library was then used to automatically categorise drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions according to the coding of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy. RESULTS: 2 930 656 prescription lines were analysed for a total of 119 689 patients. Among these prescription lines, 153 335 (5.2%) resulted in pharmaceutical interventions (n=48 202 patients; 40.2%). Pharmaceutical interventions were predominantly observed in patients aged 65 years or older (n=26 141 patients out of 53 186; 49.1%) and in patients taking five or more medications (44 702 patients out of 93 419; 47.8%). The most frequently identified types of drug-related problems associated with pharmaceutical interventions were 'Non-conformity to guidelines or contra-indication' (n=88 523; 57.7%), 'Overdosage' (16 975; 11.1%) and 'Improper administration' (13 898; 9.1%). The most frequently encountered drugs were: paracetamol (n=10 585; 6.9%), esomeprazole (6031; 3.9%), hydrochlorothiazide (2951; 1.9%), enoxaparin (2191; 1.4%), tramadol (1879; 1.2%), calcium (2073; 1.3%), perindopril (1950; 1.2%), amlodipine (1716; 1.1%), simvastatin (1560; 1.0%) and insulin (1019; 0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The deep neural network classifier used met the challenge of automatically classifying drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions from a large database without mobilising significant human resources. The use of such a classifier can lead to alerting caregivers about certain risky practices in prescription and administration, and triggering actions to improve patients' therapeutic outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Drug incompatibility, a significant subset of medication errors, threaten patient safety during the medication administration phase. Despite the undeniably high prevalence of drug incompatibility, it is currently poorly understood because previous studies are focused predominantly on intensive care unit (ICU) settings. To enhance patient safety, it is crucial to expand our understanding of this issue from a comprehensive viewpoint. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and mechanism of drug incompatibility by analysing hospital-wide prescription and administration data. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary academic hospital, included data extracted from the clinical data warehouse of the study institution on patients admitted between January 1, 2021, and May 31, 2021. Potential contacts in drug pairs (PCs) were identified using the study site clinical workflow. Drug incompatibility for each PC was determined by using a commercial drug incompatibility database, the Trissel's™ 2 Clinical Pharmaceutics Database (Trissel's 2 database). Drivers of drug incompatibility were identified, based on a descriptive analysis, after which, multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the risk factors for experiencing one or more drug incompatibilities during admission. RESULTS: Among 30,359 patients (representing 40,061 hospitalisations), 24,270 patients (32,912 hospitalisations) with 764,501 drug prescriptions (1,001,685 IV administrations) were analysed, after checking for eligibility. Based on the rule for determining PCs, 5,813,794 cases of PCs were identified. Among these, 25,108 (0.4 %) cases were incompatible PCs: 391 (1.6 %) PCs occurred during the prescription process and 24,717 (98.4 %) PCs during the administration process. By classifying these results, we identified the following drivers contributing to drug incompatibility: incorrect order factor; incorrect administration factor; and lack of related research. In multivariate analysis, the risk of encountering incompatible PCs was higher for patients who were male, older, with longer lengths of stay, with higher comorbidity, and admitted to medical ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: We comprehensively described the current state of drug incompatibility by analysing hospital-wide drug prescription and administration data. The results showed that drug incompatibility frequently occurs in clinical settings.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Effective nurse-child communication is a fundamental aspect of delivering pediatric nursing care. Family caregivers' global ratings to hospital are considered a proxy-reported measure for assessing a child's inpatient stay experience. We investigate the associations between nurse-child communication and family caregivers' global ratings to hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a national child patient experience survey data was conducted. Patient experience with nurse-child communication and the family caregivers' global ratings of hospital were measured using the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. Hierarchical linear models were constructed to examine the association between nurse-child communication measures and family caregivers' global ratings to hospital. RESULTS: Data from 1010 patients at six National Regional Centers for Pediatric in China were collected. The overall rating of hospitals and the willingness to recommend the hospital showed increasing trends as the nurse-child communication score increased. How often nurses encourage children to ask questions was significantly associated with family caregivers' overall ratings of hospital and the family caregivers' willingness to recommend the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Effective communication by nurses with the child is associated with significantly higher global ratings to the hospital by family caregivers during inpatient care. Encouraging children to ask questions is a promising contributor to caregivers' global ratings to hospital. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pediatric nurses should emphasis encouraging children to ask questions for effective communication in nursing practice. Future research is also needed to develop more targeted strategies to assist pediatric nurse to communicate with child better.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Pharmaceutical Intervention aims to optimize and rationalize the use, effectiveness, and safety of dispensed medications resolving drug-related problems (DRPs) and negative medicine outcomes (NMOs). Objectives: To evaluate Pharmaceutical Interventions in Benzodiazepines users during the COVID-19 pandemic from a Community Pharmacy. Method: Prospective observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study (AEMPS code: DAA-CLO-2020-01) of Pharmaceutical Interventions offered by the community pharmacy between August 2020 and February 2021. Results: A total of 306 Pharmaceutical Interventions were conducted involving 127 patients. Health education and personalized medication information were the most common Pharmaceutical Interventions after detecting a high level of unfamiliarity with the Benzodiazepines among patients. Pharmaceutical Interventions leading to medical referrals accounted for 37.8% of the total, triggered by the detection of DRPs and/or NMOs or after identifying the patient as candidate for deprescription. These referrals included patients with a very high level of depression according to the Euroqol 5D-3L test. Pharmaceutical Interventions resulting in Medication Review with Follow-up Service were performed in 3.1% of patients. The patient acceptance rate of Pharmaceutical Interventions reached 98.4%. Conclusions: The high acceptance rate of Pharmaceutical Interventions reinforces the value of Community Pharmacy in optimizing and rationalizing Benzodiazepines usage, while strengthening the pharmacist-patient relationship. The COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges to pharmacist-physician collaboration despite of the availability of telecommunication protocols among healthcare professionals.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (BP) increases recurrent stroke risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed hypertension prevalence, treatment, control, medication adherence, and predictors of uncontrolled BP 90 days after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke among 561 Mexican American and non-Hispanic White (NHW) survivors of stroke from the BASIC (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) cohort from 2011 to 2014. Uncontrolled BP was defined as average BP ≥140/90 mm Hg at 90 days poststroke. Hypertension was uncontrolled BP or antihypertensive medication prescribed or hypertension history. Treatment was antihypertensive use. Adherence was missing zero antihypertensive doses per week. We investigated predictors of uncontrolled BP using logistic regression adjusting for patient factors. Median (interquartile range) age was 68 (59-78) years, 64% were Mexican American, and 90% of strokes were ischemic. Overall, 94.3% of survivors of stroke had hypertension (95.6% Mexican American versus 92.0% non-Hispanic White; P=0.09). Of these, 87.9% were treated (87.3% Mexican American versus 89.1% non-Hispanic White; P=0.54). Among the total population, 38.3% (95% CI, 34.4%-42.4%) had uncontrolled BP. Among those with uncontrolled BP prescribed an antihypertensive, 84.5% reported treatment adherence (95% CI, 78.8%-89.3%). Uncontrolled BP 90 days poststroke was less likely in patients with stroke who had a primary care physician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.83]; P=0.01), greater stroke severity (aOR per-1-point-higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]; P=0.02), or more depressive symptoms (aOR per-1-point-higher Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 score, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99] among those with a history of hypertension at baseline; P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Greater than one third of survivors of stroke have uncontrolled BP at 90 days poststroke in this population-based study. Interventions are needed to improve BP control after stroke.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Americanos Mexicanos , Población Blanca , Humanos , Americanos Mexicanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/etnología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Factores de Tiempo , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etnología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/etnología , Texas/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etnología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of generalist palliative care interventions in hospitals is unknown. AIM: This study aimed to explore the impact of a palliative care case management intervention for patients with gastrointestinal cancer (PalMaGiC) on hospital admissions, healthcare use, and place of death. DESIGN: This was a register-based cohort study analyzing data from the Danish Register on Causes of Death, the Danish National Patient Register, and the Danish Palliative Database. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Deceased patients with gastrointestinal cancer from 2010 to 2020 exposed to PalMaGiC were compared over three periods of time to patients receiving standard care. RESULTS: A total of 43,969 patients with gastrointestinal cancers were included in the study, of whom 1518 were exposed to PalMaGiC. In the last 30 days of life, exposed patients were significantly more likely to be hospitalized (OR of 1.62 (95% CI 1.26-2.01)), spend more days at the hospital, estimate of 1.21 (95% CI 1.02-1.44), and have a higher number of hospital admissions (RR of 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.27)), and were more likely to die at the hospital (OR of 1.94 (95% CI 1.55-2.44)) with an increasing trend over time. No differences were found for hospital healthcare use. CONCLUSION: Patients exposed to the PalMaGiC intervention had a greater likelihood of hospitalizations and death at the hospital compared to unexposed patients, despite the opposite intention. Sensitivity analyses show that regional differences may hold some of the explanation for this. Future development of generalist palliative care in hospitals should focus on integrating a home-based approach, community care, and PC physician involvement.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Cuidados Paliativos , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Dinamarca , Anciano , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke are leading global causes of death and can be used to assess acute care quality. We examined the 30-day mortality trends after emergency department admission for AMI and stroke in Korea from 2008 to 2019, focusing on regional and income disparities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The AMI and stroke patients admitted to hospitals in Korea were collected from the claims data. We analyzed age and sex-standardized 30-day mortality for AMI, as well as hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes. Disparities in mortality were analyzed using absolute differences and relative ratios between the Organization for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD) and Korea, and among income levels and regions in Korea. A 12-year joinpoint regression was used to determine the annual percent change and the average annual percent change. RESULTS: The trends in the 30-day AMI mortality of Korea were not significantly changed from 2008 to 2019; the gap remained at 1.2 between the OECD and Korea. Korea maintained lower mortality rates for hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke than the mean of OECD. In Korea, the 30-day hemorrhagic stroke mortality showed a constant decreasing trend for the higher-income group living in urban areas; it led to a widened gap based on income levels in urban areas. The 30-day mortality for ischemic stroke tended to decrease in the higher-income group and urban areas. CONCLUSION: National-level intervention is needed to manage regional and income-based disparities in AMI and stroke 30-day mortality. It is important to understand the variance in mortality rate by different geographical regions and income levels to establish an appropriate public health strategy.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) aims to increase patient outcomes in relation to the costs incurred, with a focus on measuring these outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The German healthcare system faces the challenge of quality disparities in care amidst rising costs, making VBHC of interest. OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to illustrate how VBHC principles are currently being implemented in the field of internal medicine in Germany and to identify the potential that can be derived from VBHC pioneering examples from the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Selected case studies are presented to illustrate how VBHC principles are already being applied in internal medicine, focusing on where PROMs are utilized and how value-based reimbursement supports VBHC implementation-both in Germany and the Netherlands. RESULTS: In Germany, various cross-provider initiatives and individual providers implement the VBHC element of PROMs measurement. In addition, the Baden-Württemberg selective contract in cardiology demonstrates how financing VBHC elements in regular care was already made possible in Germany. Pioneers such as the Dutch center of excellence Diabeter and the multidisciplinary care network Netherlands Heart Network provide further inspiration for the implementation of VBHC in internal medicine. CONCLUSION: While various initiatives support the measurement of PROMs in the German context, the use of these results in care practice is not apparent. The utilization of PROMs and strategies identified in Dutch examples could be initial steps toward fostering VBHC in Germany.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos , Alemania , Países Bajos , Medicina Interna/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Atención Médica Basada en ValorRESUMEN
Purpose: Humanistic caring in clinical practice is important for quality care and patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with humanistic care for emergency patients in China and its associated factors. Methods: From October 2023 to December 2023, a multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted across 28 provinces and 87 hospitals in China, using a sampling method for inpatients in emergency department. Patient satisfaction with humanistic care was evaluated by a self-developed questionnaire with 32 items across 6 dimensions. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to explore associated factors. Results: A total of 3,003 valid questionnaires were successfully collected, with an effective rate of 86.05%. The emergency patients' total mean humanistic caring satisfaction score was 4.67 ± 0.66. Age, medical insurance type, specialized emergency department visited, waiting times, whether had accompanied person, hospital level, and hospital type are correlated factors (P < 0.05) regarding humanistic caring satisfaction. The correlation analysis showed perceived value, and its three dimensions were moderately correlated with humanistic caring satisfaction. The multiple linear regression showed waiting time (ß = -0.219, P < 0.05), whether had accompanied person (ß = -0.192, P < 0.05), hospital level (ß = -0.137, P < 0.05), functional value (ß = 0.197, P < 0.05), and emotional value (ß = 0.418, P < 0.05) were strong predictors. Conclusion: Hospitals at all levels should improve patients' perceived value, shorten waiting times, and provide caregivers with improved humanistic care in the emergency department.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanismo , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , China , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Hospitales , Adolescente , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The main aim of this study was to build an item bank for assessing the care quality of multi-professional healthcare centers (MPHCC) from the perspective of patients with multimorbidity. This study was part of the QUALSOPRIM (QUALité des SOins PRIMaires; primary healthcare quality) research project to create a psychometrically robust self-administered questionnaire to assess healthcare quality. METHODS: First, twelve experts built an item bank using data from a previous qualitative work and a systematic literature review. Second, the validity of each item was assessed in a sample of patients. Adult patients with multimorbidity were recruited from six French MPHCC. Items were assessed based on ceiling effects, the level of missing or neutral responses and patient feedback. Patient feedback was recorded after the item bank completion. Based on results, items were validated, improved, or removed during expert meetings. In case of disagreement the Delphi method was used to reach consensus. RESULTS: The study sample included 209 outpatients. The most frequent medical conditions were cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular diseases and rheumatological conditions. In total, a bank of 109 items classified in nine domains was built. The validity assessment led to the removal of 34 items. Retained items explored a variety of topics related to care quality: availability, accessibility, premises' layout and building, technical care, expertise, organization, relationships with caregivers and communication, involvement and personal relationships. CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed cross-validation of a bank of 75 items, leading to a complete picture of the patient perception of care quality items. Overall, patients were generally satisfied with their care at the MPHCC. Nonetheless, there were still numerous items on subjects for which patients' satisfaction could be improved.
Asunto(s)
Multimorbilidad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Femenino , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Psicometría , Francia , Técnica Delphi , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , AdultoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: An operating room pharmaceutical unit centralizes medical devices and drugs for various surgical specialities. The aim of this work is to present the methodology used in our establishment to set up the operating room pharmaceutical unit. METHODS: This approach involved the formation of multi-professional working groups. The needs of operating theatres were defined based on an analysis of healthcare product consumption and stock inventories. Material sheets were defined for each procedure. On the basis of simulations, material supply arrangements were selected, specifying material flows, equipment, workstations and information systems. RESULTS: Over 3200 healthcare product references were identified and 862 equipment files were created. Local stocks have been limited to medical trolleys for nursing staff. Emergency operating packs have been deployed for unforeseen operations. Cabinets have been dedicated to transporting re-sterilizable medical devices, and carts have been purchased for programmed operating packs. The equipment is made available by logistics agents and pharmacy assistants under pharmaceutical responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative approach is a model for facilities desiring to centralize and secure the logistics of healthcare products in the operating room. Ongoing adjustments will be required to meet new operating rooms needs.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The rapid expansion of robotic surgical equipment necessitates a review of the needs and challenges faced by hospitals introducing robots for the first time to compete with experienced institutions. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of robotic surgery on our hospital compared to open and laparoscopic surgery, examine internal transformations, and assess regional, domestic, and international implications. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of electronic medical records (EMRs) from 2019 to 2022 at Inha University Hospital, including patients who underwent common robotic procedures and equivalent open and laparoscopic operations. The study investigated clinical and operational performance changes in the hospital after the introduction of robotic technology. It also evaluated the operational effectiveness of robot implementation in local, national, and international contexts. To facilitate comparison with other hospitals, the data were transmitted to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. for analysis. The study was conducted in compliance with domestic personal information regulations and received approval from our Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: We analyzed EMR data from 3,147 patients who underwent surgical treatment. Over a period of 3.5 years, the adoption of robotic technology in a hospital setting significantly enhanced the technical skills of all professors involved. The introduction of robotic systems led to increased patient utilization of conventional surgical techniques, as well as a rise in the number of patients choosing robotic surgery. This collective trend contributed to an overall increase in patient numbers. This favorable evaluation of the operational effectiveness of our hospital's robot implementation in the context of local, national, and global factors is expected to positively influence policy changes. CONCLUSION: Stakeholders should embrace data science and evidence-based techniques to generate valuable insights from objective data, assess the health of robot-assisted surgery programs, and identify opportunities for improvement and excellence.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improving palliative care for inpatients is urgently needed. Data from patient-reported experience measures (PREM) can assist in identifying areas for focused improvement. This study aimed to describe patient reported experience of care in inpatients with palliative care needs, to inform a baseline understanding of care experience and identify key areas for improvement. METHODS: Cross-sectional study design where inpatients with palliative care needs were invited to complete 'consideRATE,' a patient reported experience measure of care, over six months in 2022. Inpatients with palliative care needs receiving care on an oncology, general medicine/renal and general medicine/respiratory ward (n = 3) at an Australian metropolitan hospital were screened for eligibility. Carers could provide proxy responses where inpatients were unable to participate. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative ratings, whilst free text responses were analysed using integrated thematic analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty participants (108 patients and 12 carers) completed consideRATE. The questions with the highest number of 'very good' responses were attention to symptoms, attention to feelings and attention to what matters most; the questions with the lowest number of 'very good' responses was attention to patients' affairs, what to expect, and the environment of care. Almost half (n = 57, 48%) indicated that attention to patients' affairs 'did not apply' to their inpatient stay. Analysis of 532 free text responses across 8 questions highlighted the importance of feeling supported, feeling informed, feeling heard and navigating the clinical environment. CONCLUSION: Enabling inpatients with palliative care needs to provide feedback about their experience of care is one method of ensuring improvements matter to patients. Supporting clinical teams to understand and use these data to make tailored improvements is the next step in this multi-phase research.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pacientes Internos/psicología , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Australia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Satisfacción del Paciente , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Person-centered care is foundational to good quality primary care and has positive effects on health outcomes and patient satisfaction. The Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) is a recently developed, patient-reported survey able to assess person-centeredness and has demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Little is known, however, about the feasibility of the PCPCM in non-English-speaking settings. We aimed to translate the questionnaire into Dutch, psychometrically evaluate the translated version, and ensure its feasibility for patients in Dutch primary care. METHODS: We translated the PCPCM into Dutch using forward-backward translations. We conducted psychometric evaluations to ensure its feasibility among Dutch-speaking primary care patients, with special attention to low literacy populations. Next, we assessed structural validity, convergent validity using the Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes (QUOTE) questionnaire, and internal consistency in a cross-sectional study in primary care. RESULTS: Translation and adaptation for low literacy populations required 4 iterations. In 4 general practices, 205 patients completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses could not confirm the 1-factor solution. The 3-factor solution was found to be a more optimal fit: comprehensiveness of care, personal relation, and contextual care. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α were 0.82, 0.73, and 0.86, respectively). We found a strong correlation between the total PCPCM and QUOTE scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.65, P <.001), indicating good convergent validity. CONCLUSION: The Dutch version of the PCPCM has acceptable validity and reliability for measuring person-centeredness in primary care among Dutch-speaking populations including those with low literacy.
Asunto(s)
Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Psicometría , Traducciones , Humanos , Países Bajos , Femenino , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Factorial , Traducción , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
This study aims to assess the service quality and user satisfaction of a community support program (CSP) in a specific administrative region of Taiwan. Employing a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 450 CSP users in the region via a questionnaire. Statistical analyses, including descriptive analysis, ANOVA, and Scheffe's Test, were conducted using SPSS 22.0. The findings reveal that users aged 70-79 years with primary education, as well as those with demand or unknown demand for long-term care, reported the highest level of satisfaction with CSP services (mean = 4.5, SD = 0.7, p < 0.05). The study underscores the influence of user characteristics and their understanding of the services on satisfaction levels. These insights provide clear direction for policymakers in shaping the future of CSPs, emphasizing the importance of addressing user needs and enhancing awareness and the utilization of available services.
RESUMEN
In 2021 and 2022, researchers carried out an implementation trial that considered how the capsule sponge test might be used to screen for Barrett's oesophagus using a mobile clinic in East Anglia. This paper offers insights from 15 months of ethnographic fieldwork studying the trial. It aims to highlight the value of the test in offering reassurance to worried patients, particularly to those with a family history of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. It also considers the variety of aims people held for the capsule sponge test, including the hope that it would address their symptoms of acid reflux, and the conflict that sometimes emerged as a result. The second half of the paper uses fieldwork carried out in virtual support groups for people with Barrett's oesophagus to explore experiences postdiagnosis, which sometimes were defined by fear of future cancers. It describes notable differences between the care offered to people with morphological risk conditions like Barrett's oesophagus and the care given to those with genetic risk conditions, including the provision of genetic counselling. More broadly, the paper highlights a tension between patient-centred and risk-centred medicine that is likely to grow as healthcare services continue to shift towards preventative approaches.
RESUMEN
AIM: Given challenges in collecting long-term outcomes for survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), most studies have focused on in-hospital survival. We evaluated the correlation between a hospital's risk-standardized survival rate (RSSR) at hospital discharge for IHCA with its RSSR for long-term survival. METHODS: We identified patients ≥65 years of age with IHCA at 472 hospitals in Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry during 2000-2012, who could be linked to Medicare files to obtain post-discharge survival data. We constructed hierarchical logistic regression models to compute RSSR at discharge, and 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year RSSRs for each hospital. The association between in-hospital and long-term RSSR was evaluated with weighted Kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Among 56,231 Medicare beneficiaries (age 77.2 ± 7.5 years and 25,206 [44.8%] women), 10,536 (18.7%) survived to discharge and 8,485 (15.1%) survived to 30 days after discharge. Median in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year RSSRs were 18.6% (IQR, 16.7-20.4%), 14.9% (13.2-16.7%), 10.3% (9.1-12.1%), and 7.6% (6.8-8.8%), respectively. The weighted Kappa coefficient for the association between a hospital's RSSR at discharge with its 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year RSSRs were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.76), 0.56 (0.50-0.61), and 0.47 (0.41-0.53), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation between a hospital's RSSR at discharge and its 30-day RSSR for IHCA, although this correlation weakens over time. Our findings suggest that a hospital's RSSR at discharge for IHCA may be a reasonable surrogate of its 30-day post-discharge survival and could be used by Medicare to benchmark hospital performance for this condition without collecting 30-day survival data.