Chidamide plus R-GDP for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients ineligible for autologous transplantation: A prospective, single-arm, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: In relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a negative prognosis is frequently linked to heightened epigenetic heterogeneity. Chidamide, a selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, shows promise as a targeted therapy for R/R DLBCL by targeting abnormal epigenetic changes associated with poor prognosis. METHODS: A cohort of 27 ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL participated in an open - label, single - arm study. Chidamide was administered orally at a dose of 30 mg twice weekly for one week during the induction monotherapy phase. The subsequent combination therapy phase involved oral chidamide at a dose of 20 mg twice weekly for two weeks, followed by a one-week discontinuation period, in conjunction with intravenous R-GDP every 21 days. RESULTS: Among the cohort of 31 patients who underwent screening (median age: 67 years), 27 were ultimately included in the study, with 14 individuals successfully completing six cycles of C-R-GDP treatment. The overall best objective response rate was determined to be 79.1% (95% CI: 75.1%-83.3%), comprising a complete response rate of 45.8% (95% CI: 41.6%-49.9%) and a partial response rate of 33.3% (95% CI: 29.3%-37.4%). Within the subgroup of 14 patients who completed the full treatment regimen, the best objective response rate reached 100%, with 71.4% achieving complete response (n = 10) and 28.6% achieving partial response (n = 4). The median follow-up period for these patients was 17.0 months, ranging from 3.5 to 55 months. Progression-free survival was 5.9 months and overall survival was 48.3 months. Anemia was the most common adverse event, affecting all patients. Thrombocytopenia led to treatment interruption or dose reduction in 13 patients. Other common adverse events included hypocalcemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia. Three patients experienced grade 3 pneumonitis and one had grade 3 skin rash. CONCLUSIONS: Chidamide combined with R-GDP is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with R/R DLBCL who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Re-examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the era of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

Historically, salvage chemoimmunotherapy with consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was the only potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Treatment options were few and outcomes poor for patients whose lymphoma failed to respond to salvage chemotherapy/ASCT and for patients not eligible for ASCT. The approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory LBCL revolutionized the treatment landscape with unprecedented response rates and durability of responses. As a result, earlier intervention with CAR T-cell therapy has been explored, and the enthusiasm for CAR T-cell therapy has overshadowed ASCT. In this article, we will review the data available for ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed LBCL and will examine the role for ASCT in relapsed/refractory LBCL in the era of CAR T-cell therapy.

Nursing Considerations for the Clinical Management of Adverse Events Associated with Talquetamab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

OBJECTIVES: Talquetamab is a newly approved bispecific antibody targeting the CD3 receptor on T cells and a receptor, G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), highly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. In addition to immune therapy-related adverse events (AEs) associated with bispecific antibody therapies, talquetamab is associated with unique skin/nail and oral GPRC5D-related side effects that require additional supportive care. This review provides clinical management strategies for talquetamab based on oncology nurses' experience during the MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799/NCT04634552) clinical trial. The objective of this review is to raise awareness among nurses and patients to better understand and manage the side effects associated with talquetamab treatment in order to optimize patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MonumenTAL-1 is a phase 1/2 clinical trial of talquetamab in patients with relapsed/refractory MM who are triple-class exposed. Details on overall response, safety, and AE incidence and occurrence were previously published. Management strategies for the T-cell-related and unique GPRC5D-related AEs were collected from oncology nurses from different study sites. CONCLUSION: Talquetamab has shown overall response rates of >71% in patients with relapsed/refractory MM in the MonumenTAL-1 study. AEs were low grade and predictable; few led to study discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Oncology nurses have specialized knowledge of treatment administration monitoring based on their participation in the MonumenTAL-1 trial. This review provides information for nurses in both the academic and community settings on how to monitor, counsel, and support patients, which will in turn improve patients' quality of life and overall survival.

Outcomes of adults with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine and venetoclax compared to other therapies: a multicenter retrospective study.

This study reports characteristics and outcomes of adults who received Azacitidine-Venetoclax (AZA-VEN) compared to other salvage therapies (NO-AZA-VEN) as first salvage therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The clinical data of 81 patients with a diagnosis of relapsed or refractory AML were analyzed. The ORR was comparable for both groups (55% vs 57%, p = 0.852). Median OS (6.8 vs 11.2 months, p = 0.053) and median RFS (6.9 vs 11.2 months, p = 0.488) showed a trend in favor of the NO-AZA-VEN group. OS was significantly longer with NO-AZA-VEN for ELN 2022 risk category sub-group, patients under 60 years old, primary AML and for patients who underwent allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplant after salvage therapy. There was no statistical difference in complications of treatment such as febrile neutropenia, intensive care unit stay, septic shock and total parenteral nutrition. Those results do not support the preferential use of AZA-VEN over other regimens in R/R acute myeloid leukemia.

Multiple myeloma: clinical characteristics, current therapies and emerging innovative treatments targeting ribosome biogenesis dynamics.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clinical disorder characterized by aberrant plasma cell growth in the bone marrow microenvironment. Globally, the prevalence of MM has been steadily increasing at an alarming rate. In the United States, more than 30,000 cases will be diagnosed in 2024 and it accounts for about 2% of cancer diagnoses and more than 2% of cancer deaths, more than double the worldwide figure. Both symptomatic and active MM are distinguished by uncontrolled plasma cell growth, which results in severe renal impairment, anemia, hypercalcemia, and bone loss. Multiple drugs have been approved by the FDA and are now widely used in clinical practice for MM. Although triplet and quadruplet induction regimens, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and maintenance treatment are used, MM continues to be an incurable illness characterized by relapses that may occur at various phases of its progression. MM patients with frailty, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia, central nervous system recurrence, functional high risk, and the elderly are among those with the greatest current unmet needs. The high cost of care is an additional challenge. MM cells are highly protein secretary cells and thus are dependent on the activation of certain translation pathways. MM also has a high chance of altering ribosomal protein-encoding genes like MYC mutation. In this article we discuss the importance of ribosome biogenesis in promoting MM and RNA polymerase I inhibition as an upcoming treatment with potential promise for MM patients.

Challenges in overcoming advanced-stage or relapsed refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Introduction: Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL), a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, is known for its destructive local impact on nasal structures and systemic induction of inflammatory cytokines. Concurrent treatment with radiation and nonanthracycline- based chemotherapy has improved survival rates in patients with localized disease stages. However, survival outcomes vary significantly in advanced-stage and relapsed or refractory (R/R) cases. Methods: Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis using random effects models to assess prognostic factors in advanced or R/R ENKTCL, employing a digital extractor on Kaplan-Meier graphs owing to the scarcity of published prospective trials for these patients. Results: We observed that patients with advanced ENKTCL treated with Lasparaginase had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.3 months and an overall survival (OS) of 19 months. In R/R ENKTCL, PFS and OS were 11.7 and 15.6 months, respectively. Additionally, OS outcomes in advanced-stage ENKTCL were better in the asparaginase group than that in the non-asparaginase group, with PEG-asparaginase showing superior results compared with that using Lasparaginase. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-DNA positivity in the bloodstream prior to treatment was associated with poor outcomes in advanced-stage ENKTCL, and similar trends were observed in patients with R/R ENKTCL and post-treatment EBV viremia. Discussion: Collectively, these findings suggest that chemotherapy with Lasparaginase or PEG-asparaginase can enhance survival in advanced or R/R ENKTCL. However, future strategies must be developed to effectively suppress EBV viremia and achieve a deep response toward tumor eradication.

Efficacy of ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone regimen in daratumumab-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective analysis.

We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), p = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) p = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), p = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR).

Efficacy of CARVYKTI in CARTITUDE-4 versus other conventional treatment regimens for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Aim: The phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) demonstrated superiority of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) over daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) and pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have received one to three prior line(s) of therapy (LOT[s]) including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and are refractory to lenalidomide. These analyses estimate the relative efficacy between cilta-cel and other common treatment regimens, for which no direct comparative evidence is available. Materials & methods: Patient data were available from the CARTITUDE-4, CASTOR, CANDOR and APOLLO RCTs. Imbalances between cohorts on key patient characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Relative efficacies were estimated with response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better rate (≥VGPR) and complete response or better rate (≥CR), and with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analyses using different analytical methods and additional covariates were explored. Results: Key characteristics were well balanced across cohorts after IPTW. Cilta-cel showed statistically significant benefit in PFS (HRs: 0.11-0.51), ≥VGPR (RRs: 1.51-5.13) and ≥CR (RRs: 2.90-35.24) versus all comparators, and statistically significant improvements in ORR over most comparator regimens (RRs: 1.22-1.90). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Cilta-cel demonstrated benefit over other common treatment regimens, highlighting its potential to become a new standard of care option for lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients with one to three prior LOT(s). These comparisons help to demonstrate the improved efficacy of cilta-cel in countries where the standard of care may differ from DPd/PVd.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Contemporary Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Era of Cellular Therapies.

Since the 1990s, the standard of care for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) had been salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) in patients with a chemotherapy-sensitive remission. However, promising results from the recent TRANSFORM and ZUMA-7 trials evaluating the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy versus HDT-ASCT for second line relapsed/refractory DLBCL have sought to challenge this standard of care. While these studies have established a new standard for the treatment of early relapsed and primary refractory DLBCL, significant differences in the trial design between these studies and limitations with the timing of randomization during the disease course warrant a thoughtful interpretation of the results. Additionally, the financial burden and logistic challenges of CAR T-cell administration and limited access to these therapies continue to be ongoing issues. Despite the encouraging results from these trials, HDT-ASCT continues to have a role in the treatment of DLBCL, especially in disease relapsing ≥12 months after initial therapy, and in chemo sensitive disease with a good response to salvage chemotherapy. Ongoing studies evaluating novel salvage regimens for use prior to HDT-ASCT, and future studies evaluating the role of CAR T-cell therapy in chemo sensitive disease will help determine the continued role of HDT-ASCT for relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

From Triple- to Penta-Exposed Multiple Myeloma: A Real-World Study in a Medicare Population.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been transformed by novel therapies, including CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and proteasome inhibitors (PIs), resulting in increasing numbers of patients who are triple-class exposed (TCE; exposed to ≥ 1 drug in each class). Many patients are penta-exposed (PE; ≥ 2 IMiDs, ≥ 2 PIs, and a CD38 mAb), some are triple-class refractory (TCR), and some are PE and TCR (PE-TCR). Data on real-world outcomes in elderly patients with MM across this spectrum of exposure are limited. METHODS: Data from the Medicare Chronic Conditions Warehouse Database from November 2006-December 2020 were used to examine cohorts of TCE, TCR, PE, and PE-TCR patients. Outcomes were assessed from the start of the index line of therapy (LOT), defined as the first LOT after becoming TCE or PE. RESULTS: A total of 2830 TCE, 1371 TCR, 1121 PE, and 774 PE-TCR patients were identified. Pomalidomide was the most frequently used medication for the index LOT in all cohorts (32.6% [PE-TCR] to 43.3% [TCR]). The most frequently used regimens for the index LOT were pomalidomide plus daratumumab for TCE (17.2%) and PE (7.0%), pomalidomide plus carfilzomib for TCR (10.3%), and pomalidomide plus elotuzumab for PE-TCR (7.4%). Median time to discontinuation (TTD) ranged from 4.2 (PE-TCR) to 6.9 (TCE) months, and overall survival (OS) ranged from 13.0 (TCR) to 15.9 (PE) months. Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) was lowest for TCE and highest for PE-TCR patients. Mean monthly healthcare costs (HCC) ranged from $23,091 (TCE) to $24,412 (PE-TCR). MM medications represented 66.2% (PE-TCR) to 72.8% (TCE) of costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study across a spectrum of Medicare TCE patients, there was heterogeneity in treatment regimens, suggesting no standard of care. TTD and OS were short, and HRU and HCC were high. These results underscore the potential for new therapies in this population.

Complete loss of lineage defining antigens in two cases of B-cell malignancies following CAR-T therapy.

Targeted immunotherapy is a promising approach in treating high-risk and refractory/relapsed lymphoid malignancies. Although this strategy has shown a significant success in treating non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma, relapse with loss of targeted antigen can occur. Rarely, complete loss of multiple lineage specific markers can happen. We are describing 2 cases of B-cell neoplasms along with contributing immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic, and molecular results. Post-targeted CAR-T therapy, both cases, one aggressive B-cell lymphoma and the other plasma cell myeloma, lost B-cell, and plasma cell antigens, respectively. Complete loss of lineage specific markers post-targeted therapy is a rare event that makes the diagnosis of the relapsed neoplasm challenging. In this article, we also reviewed the literature and highlighted possible mechanisms of antigen loss following targeted therapy.

PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of relapsed primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma follow up by 18F-FDG PET/CT: A case report and literature review.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a specific subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which occurs more frequently in young women. PMBCL is an uncommon kind of cancer. R-EPOCH is a common therapeutic regimen that is suitable for patients with PMBCL, and could get a relatively high complete remission rate. However, it may not be effective response in patients with relapsed PMBCL. Immunotherapy appears to be helpful in recent years. Therefore, in this case, a 31-year-old female patient with relapsed PMBCL. Progressive disease was identified after rechemotherapy and target therapy, complete remission can be achieved after switching to PD-1 inhibitor plus targeted therapy. These recurrence, progression, remission and follow-up are all displayed well on 18F-FDG PET/CT. This case with consecutive imaging monitor illustrates that PD-1 inhibitor may be used as a first-line treatment for recurrent PMBCL. In addition, 18F-FDG PET/CT is strongly recommended for monitoring PMBCL include baseline staging, interim response and follow-up study.

Triplet therapy with gilteritinib, venetoclax, and azacitidine for relapsed/refractory FLT3mut acute myeloid leukemia.

The FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but the overall survival (OS) is only approximately 20 % and few patients achieve deep and/ or durable response. We retrospectively analyzed 29 R/R FLT3mut AML patients treated on triplet regimens (gilteritinib+ venetoclaxï¼»VEN] +azacitidineï¼»AZA]). Nineteen patients (65.5 %) had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The modified composite complete remission (mCRc) rate was 62.1 % (n = 18; CR, 4/29,13.8 %; CRi, 6/29, 20.7 %; MLFS, 8/29, 27.6 %). Among 18 patients achieved mCRc, FLT3-PCR negativity was 94.4 % (n=17), and flow-cytometry negativity was 77.7 % (n=14). The mCRc rate was 70 % (n=7) in 10 patients without prior FLT3 TKI exposure and 57.8 % (n=11) in 19 patients with prior FLT3 TKI exposure (P=0.52). At the end of the first cycle, the median time to ANC > 0.5× 109/L was 38 days and platelet > 50× 109/L was 31 days among responders, but 60-day mortality was 0 %. The estimated 2-year OS was 60.9 % for all R/R FLT3mut patients. The 1-year OS was 80 % and 58.8 % in patients without and with prior FLT3 TKI exposure, respectively (P=0.79). The estimated 2-year OS was 62 % in 19 (65.5 %) patients who received allo-HSCT after triplet therapy and 37 % in 10 patients who did not receive allo-HSCT (P=0.03). In conclusion, triplet therapy with gilteritinib, VEN, and AZA is effective and safe and an excellent frontline option for R/R FLT3mut AML.

Safety and activity of lenalidomide in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single group, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.

Background: Rituximab and lenalidomide is a preferred option for relapsed indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Obinutuzumab may be a superior combination partner with lenalidomide given enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis compared to rituximab. Our aim was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and activity of lenalidomide in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory WHO Grade 1-3A follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma and adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We excluded patients with evidence of ongoing transformation to aggressive lymphoma. During phase 1, 1000 mg intravenous obinutuzumab was administered with three predefined levels of oral lenalidomide in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to establish lenalidomide 20 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. During phase 2, patients received induction therapy with six 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 20 mg with intravenous obinutuzumab 1000 mg. In accordance with our prior experience with lenalidomide plus rituximab, patients who were responding to the combination could receive up to 6 additional cycles (up to 12 cycles in total) of combination therapy. Dosing of obinutuzumab was continued in all responding patients after cycle 6 every 2 months for a total of 30 months from the start of therapy. The decision of number of cycles of combination therapy beyond 6 was at discretion of the investigator and was included to allow individualisation of therapy to maximise response while minimising exposure. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and overall response, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response in relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the end of induction therapy, according to Cheson and colleagues (2007 criteria). The secondary endpoints were complete response after induction therapy and time to event endpoints including time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Analyses were intent to treat in the efficacy cohort and per-treated in the safety population in all patients who received at least one dose of either investigational agent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01995669. Findings: Between June 03, 2014, and 07 March 2019, we completed planned enrolment, and 66 patients started therapy including 9 patients in phase 1 and 57 patients in phase 2. All patients were evaluated for safety and the 60 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide 20 mg were evaluable for activity. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia 21% (14/66) and thrombocytopenia 11% (7/66) with no cases of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities included lung infection 8% (5/66), fatigue 8% (5/66) and rash 6% (4/66). By Cheson 2007 criteria, 90% (54/60, 95% CI: 79-96) achieved an overall response at the end of induction meeting the prespecified activity endpoint. Complete responses were seen in 33% (20/60, 95% CI: 22-47) at the end of induction. Median progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival have not been reached after median follow-up of 41.7 months. Estimated 4-year progression free survival rates were 55% (95% CI: 42-73), time to progression of 56% (95% CI: 43-74) and overall survival of 84% (95% CI: 74-95). Interpretation: Our findings suggest that oral lenalidomide with obinutuzumab is safe and highly active in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is associated with prolonged remission duration. The study is limited by the lack of a control arm leading to cross-trial comparisons to evaluate activity. Future randomised trials comparing this regime to rituximab and lenalidomide are warranted. Funding: Genentech and an MD Anderson Core grant.

Evaluating pirtobrutinib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is generally considered incurable. Covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi) are the cornerstone of treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) MCL, but treatment options are limited and prognosis is poor after cBTKi failure. Pirtobrutinib is a non-covalent BTK inhibitor that has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety and represents an important new treatment in the evolving treatment landscape of R/R MCL. AREAS COVERED: This review will provide an overview of the therapeutic landscape of R/R MCL, characteristics of pirtobrutinib, and efficacy and safety data of pirtobrutinib in R/R MCL from pivotal clinical trials. PubMed and major hematology conference proceedings were searched to identify relevant studies involving pirtobrutinib. EXPERT OPINION: For patients with R/R MCL that has progressed after treatment with cBTKi, pirtobrutinib is an important and efficacious treatment that confers favorable outcomes. In the post-cBTKi setting, when chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is not available or feasible, pirtobrutinib is the preferred treatment for R/R MCL. How to sequence or combine pirtobrutinib with CAR T-cell therapy and other available or emerging therapies requires further investigation. Future studies should also explore the role of pirtobrutinib in earlier lines of therapy for MCL.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on utilizing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy as a second-line treatment for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Introduction: Inconsistent results observed in recent phase III trials assessing chimeric antigenic receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy as a second-line treatment compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) prompted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in this setting. Methods: Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for comparison between CAR-T cell therapy and SOC. Mixed treatment comparisons were made using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach. Results: Meta-analysis of three trials with 865 patients showed significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS: HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.97; I2: 92%), progression-free survival (PFS: HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; I2: 0%) with CAR-T cell therapy compared to SOC. Although there was a signal of potential overall survival (OS) improvement with CAR-T cell therapy, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.03; I2: 29%). Mixed treatment comparisons showed significant EFS benefit with liso-cel (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.61) and axi-cel (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.29-0.61) compared to tisa-cel. Discussion: CAR-T cell therapy, as a second-line treatment, appears to be effective in achieving higher response rates and delaying the disease progression compared to SOC in R/R DLBCL.

Phase IB Study of Oral Selinexor in Combination with Rituximab and Platinum Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma-Final Analysis.

PURPOSE: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportine-1 (XPO1) with efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a study investigating the combination of selinexor with rituximab and platinum-based chemotherapy in B-cell lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase 1b, dose-escalation, and expansion trial, which enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients received oral selinexor according to a 3 + 3 design in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, oxaliplatine (DHAOX) or gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, 27 during the escalation phase and 12 during the expansion phase. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 77%). Group R-DHAOX was prematurely closed to inclusion due to a recommendation from the French drug agency, independent of this trial. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor in association with R-GPD was established at 40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. In a population of 18 patients treated at this dose of selinexor, the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were hematological. With this regimen, seven obtained a complete metabolic response and five a partial response. The median PFS was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma, selinexor at a weekly dose of 40 mg with R-GDP is feasible for outpatients, with a generally acceptable safety profile.

Plain language summary of the CARTITUDE-4 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a phase 3 clinical trial called CARTITUDE-4. This trial compared the anti-cancer therapy ciltacabtagene autoleucel (or cilta-cel) with standard therapies in people who have multiple myeloma, a cancer that affects specific kinds of blood cells called plasma cells. The people in the study had been treated with 1 to 3 previous treatments for multiple myeloma, including a common anti-myeloma treatment called lenalidomide, but their multiple myeloma did not get better. HOW WAS THE STUDY IN THIS SUMMARY CONDUCTED?: About half of the 419 participants in this study received cilta-cel, while the other half received standard therapies, or therapies that are commonly used to treat multiple myeloma. Participants who received cilta-cel had a type of immune cell called T cells collected from their blood and genetically modified to recognize a specific protein found on myeloma cells. These modified T cells, which comprise cilta-cel, were then infused back into the bloodstream. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY?: After approximately 1 year in the study, more participants were alive without their cancer getting worse in the cilta-cel group (76%) than in the standard therapies group (49%). The most common side effects in both groups were infections and low blood cell counts. Cytokine release syndrome (a potentially serious side effect caused by overactivation of the immune system) was common but mostly mild. Neurotoxicities (including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, which can cause symptoms such as headaches, changes in consciousness, and difficulty with memory, attention, speaking, or understanding others) were less common and were reported in 20.5% of participants treated with cilta-cel. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: In CARTITUDE-4, more participants treated with cilta-cel showed improvements and were alive with control of their disease 12 months after receiving cilta-cel compared with participants who received standard therapies.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04181827 (CARTITUDE-4) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Outcomes of patients undergoing third hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

With advancements in novel therapeutics, it is unclear whether third hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT3) has a place in the treatment of recurrent hematopoietic malignancies. We evaluated patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent HCT3 between 2000-2020. Nine patients, with a median age of 18 (9-68) years at HCT3 with acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 5), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 2), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 1), or undifferentiated acute leukemia (n = 1), were identified. The median time between first HCT and HCT3 was 3.9 (0.7-13.6) years. Indication for HCT3 was relapse (n = 8) or graft failure (n = 1) after second HCT. At HCT3, seven of nine patients were in complete remission by flow cytometry. All experienced robust donor engraftment by one month after HCT3 (≥ 90% CD3) while one died at day + 24 of multi-organ failure and was not evaluable for chimerism. In total, eight patients died from relapse (n = 4), non-relapse, (n = 3) or unknown (n = 1) causes at a median of 0.6 (range, 0.1 - 9.9) years after HCT3. After HCT3, estimated overall survival at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 88%, 63%, and 22%, respectively. In this highly selected group, HCT3 provided a treatment option although long-term survival was still dismal.

Novel natural killer cell-based therapies for hematologic and solid malignancies: latest updates from ASCO 2024.

Natural killer (NK) cell-based therapies have made great progress in treating both hematological and solid tumors. Their unique mechanism of action does not rely on antigen presentation to recognize and eliminate tumor cells, making them a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of the latest clinical data of the novel NK cell-based therapies from the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, highlighting the potential of these advancements to revolutionize the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.