J-shaped association between apolipoprotein B and CV outcomes in statin-treated patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The association between apolipoprotein B (apoB) and residual cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between apoB levels and CV outcomes in statin-treated CCS patients. METHODS: We enrolled 8641 statin-treated CCS patients at Fuwai Hospital. The patients were divided into 5 groups based on to apoB quintiles (Q1 to Q5). The primary endpoint was 3-year CV events, including CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.17 years, there were 232 (2.7%) CV events. After multivariable adjustment, a restricted cubic spline illustrated a J-shaped relationship between apoB levels and 3-year CV events, with the risk remaining flat until apoB levels exceeded 0.73g/L, after which the risk increased (nonlinear P <.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed the lowest CV event rate in the Q3 group (0.68-0.78g/L). Compared with the Q3 group, multivariable Cox regression models revealed that both low (Q1, ≤0.57g/L) and high (Q5, >0.93g/L) apoB levels were associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (all P <.05). Notably, patients with low apoB levels (Q1) had the highest risk of CV death (HR, 2.44; 95%CI, 1.17-5.08). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicates that both low and high levels of apoB are associated with elevated CV risk, with the risk being particularly pronounced at higher levels (> 0.73g/L).

Impact of recent criteria changes for the deferral criteria specific to men who have sex with men in France.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2016, France allowed men who have sex with men (MSM) to donate blood if they had not had sex with men in the previous 12 months. In April 2020, this restriction was relaxed to 4 months due to the lack of negative impact observed on blood safety. This study assesses the impact of reducing this deferral period on epidemiological surveillance indicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares infection surveillance indicators between two 30-month periods before (P1) and after (P2) this second deferral change. RESULTS: Overall, 79 donations tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (49 in P1 and 30 in P2), 322 for hepatitis C virus (HCV) (185 and 137), 622 for hepatitis B virus (HBV) (355 and 267) and 1684 for syphilis (799 and 885). Positive donation rates decreased between P1 and P2, except for syphilis: HIV (0.07/10,000 donations vs. 0.04; p > 0.5), HCV (0.25 vs. 0.20; p < 0.05), HBV (0.49 vs. 0.39; p < 0.01) and syphilis (1.10 vs. 1.29; p < 0.001). For all three viruses, residual risks of transmission by transfusion did not increase: HIV (1/7,800,000 donations vs. 1/10,500,000), HCV (1/25,200,000 vs. 1/47,300,000) and HBV (1/6,400,000 vs. 1/6,000,000). CONCLUSION: Reducing the deferral period for MSM in April 2020 did not negatively impact residual risks, which remained very low, or the rate of positive donations, except for syphilis, which requires careful monitoring. To ensure equal access to blood donation, MSM have been allowed to donate blood under the same conditions as other donors since March 2022 (i.e., no more than one sexual partner in the last 4 months).

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins cholesterol, 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, and risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins cholesterol (TRLs-C) has been associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), even among individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the targeted range. We assessed whether the associations of TRLs-C with myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke (IS) vary by the burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, as reflected by predicted 10-year risk for ASCVD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included were 327,899 participants from the UK Biobank who were free of MI or IS and did not receive lipid-lowering treatment at baseline. Ten-year risk for ASCVD was estimated by the Pooled Cohort Equations and was grouped as low (<7.5%), intermediate (7.5% to <20%), and high risk (≥20%). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to examine the associations of TRLs-C and triglycerides with risk of MI and IS, overall and by the 10-year risk categories. RESULTS: During a median of 12.3 years of follow-up, 8,358 incident MI and 4,400 incident IS cases were identified. Overall, higher TRLs-C was associated with a higher risk of MI (p-trend <.0001) but not IS (p-trend = 0.074). Triglycerides and non-HDL-C levels provide generally similar results. There was evidence for interactions between TRLs-C, triglycerides, non-HDL-C and 10-year ASCVD risk on risk of MI. However, the interaction was only between TRLs-C, triglycerides and10-year ASCVD risk on risk of IS. Hazard ratios (95% CIs) of MI comparing the highest with the lowest quartiles of TRLs-C, triglycerides, non-HDL-C were 2.10 (1.23-1.30), 2.02 (1.80-2.27) and 2.17 (1.93-2.44) in the low-risk group. The corresponding estimates for IS were 1.24 (1.05-1.45) 1.25 (1.06-1.47) and 1.08 (0.92-1.27) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The associations of TRLs-C with MI and IS were significant in the low-risk group. Triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol are roughly equivalent to TRLs-C in determining risk. These findings may have implications for more detailed risk stratification and early intervention.

Significance of Persistent Inflammation in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the REAL-CAD Study.

Background: The prognostic implications of persistent low-grade inflammation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) are underexplored. The REAL-CAD (Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid Lowering Therapy with Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease) study demonstrated the benefit of higher intensity pitavastatin in Japanese patients with CCS. Objectives: This prespecified subanalysis of the REAL-CAD study aimed to assess the prognostic effect of the persistent low-grade inflammation represented by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in CCS patients. Methods: The present analysis involved patients without events until 6 months after randomization and whose hs-CRP levels were available at baseline and 6 months (n = 10,460). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unstable angina hospitalization. Landmark analyses evaluated the prognostic impact of continuous inflammation in 4 groups based on the median levels of hs-CRP (0.5 mg/L for both) at baseline and 6 months. The 4 groups included patient with persistently low, elevated (increased), reduced, and persistently high hs-CRP. Results: Adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses demonstrated an increased risk of the primary endpoint in the group with persistently high hs-CRP when compared to the group with persistently low hs-CRP as a reference (adjusted HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18-1.89; P = 0.001), but with a similar risk in the group with elevated (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.77-1.49, P = 0.68) and reduced (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.66-1.27; P = 0.60) hs-CRP. Conclusions: The study shows that persistent low-grade inflammation is associated with poor outcomes and underscores the need to address residual inflammatory risk in CCS patients. (Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid Lowering Therapy With Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease [REAL-CAD]; NCT01042730).

It is time to address the contribution of cholesterol in all apoB-containing lipoproteins to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

On average, LDL particles are the most populous lipoprotein in serum under fasting conditions. For many reasons, it has been the primary target of lipid-lowering guidelines around the world. In the past 30 years, we have witnessed remarkable changes in each iteration of dyslipidaemia guidelines, with LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) targets becoming lower and lower among patients at high and very high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The world over, goal attainment rates are low, and hence, ASCVD prevalence remains unacceptably high. Inadequate LDL-C lowering is a major issue in contemporary cardiovascular (CV) medicine. Another issue that vexes even the most astute clinician is that of 'residual risk', meaning the excess risk that remains even after LDL-C is appropriately reduced. In recent years, an important new component of residual risk has emerged: triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins or remnant lipoproteins. These precursors to LDL particles can assume outsized importance among patients with derangements in triglyceride metabolism (e.g. genetic variants, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus) and may be more atherogenic than LDL species. Consequently, to reduce total risk for acute CV events, the time has come to include the entire spectrum of apoB-containing lipoproteins in approaches to both risk evaluation and treatment.

The relative impact of components of high residual risk on the long-term prognosis after AMI.

Background: The reduction in long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is less pronounced than that of in-hospital mortality among patients with AMI complicated by heart failure (HF) and/or in those with a high residual thrombotic risk (HTR). Aim: To investigate the relative prognostic significance of HTR and HF in AMI survivors. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients admitted for AMI in 2014-2015 in all Italian hospitals. HTR was defined as at least one of the following conditions: previous AMI, ischemic stroke or other vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, renal failure. Patients were classified into four categories: uncomplicated AMI; AMI with HTR; AMI with HF and AMI with both HTR and HF (HTR + HF). Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the impact of HTR, HF and HTR + HF on the 5-year prognosis. A time-varying coefficient analysis was performed to estimate the 5-year trend of HR for major averse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results: a total of 174.869 AMI events were identified. The adjusted 5-year HR for MACCE was 1.74 (p < 0.0001) and 1.75 (p < 0.0001) in HTR and HF patients vs uncomplicated patients, respectively. The coexistence of HTR and HF furtherly increased the risk of MACCE (HR = 2.43, p < 0.0001) over the first 3 years after AMI. Conclusion: Either HRT and HF confer an increased 5-year hazard of MACCE after AMI. The coexistence of HTR and HF doubled the overall 5-year risk of MACCE after AMI.

Beyond LDL-C: unravelling the residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk landscape-focus on hypertriglyceridaemia.

Aims: Historically, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile mitigation has had a predominant focus on low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this narrative review we explore the residual ASCVD risk profile beyond LDL-C with a focus on hypertriglyceridaemia, recent clinical trials of therapeutics targeting hypertriglyceridaemia and novel modalities addressing other residual ASCVD risk factors. Findings: Hypertriglyceridaemia remains a significant ASCVD risk despite low LDL-C in statin or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor-treated patients. Large population-based observational studies have consistently demonstrated an association between hypertriglyceridaemia with ASCVD. This relationship is complicated by the co-existence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Despite significantly improving atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the most recent clinical trial outcome has cast doubt on the utility of pharmacologically lowering triglyceride concentrations using fibrates. On the other hand, purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), but not in combination with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has produced favourable ASCVD outcomes. The outcome of these trials suggests alternate pathways involved in ASCVD risk modulation. Several other pharmacotherapies have been proposed to address other ASCVD risk factors targeting inflammation, thrombotic and metabolic factors. Implications: Hypertriglyceridaemia poses a significant residual ASCVD risk in patients already on LDL-C lowering therapy. Results from pharmacologically lowering triglyceride are conflicting. The role of fibrates and combination of EPA and DHA is under question but there is now convincing evidence of ASCVD risk reduction with pure EPA in a subgroup of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia. Clinical guidelines should be updated in line with recent clinical trials evidence. Novel agents targeting non-conventional ASCVD risks need further evaluation.

Salmonella Prevalence in Raw Cocoa Beans and a Microbiological Risk Assessment to Evaluate the Impact of Cocoa Liquor Processing on the Reduction of Salmonella.

Salmonella in raw cocoa beans (n = 870) from main sourcing areas over nine months was analyzed. It was detected in 71 (ca. 8.2%) samples, with a contamination level of 0.3-46 MPN/g except for one sample (4.1 × 104 CFU/g). Using prevalence and concentration data as input, the impact of thermal treatment in cocoa processing on the risk estimate of acquiring salmonellosis by a random Belgian chocolate consumer was calculated by a quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) approach. A modular process risk model from raw cocoa beans to cocoa liquor up to a hypothetical final product (70-90% dark chocolate tablet) was set up to understand changes in Salmonella concentrations following the production process. Different thermal treatments during bean or nib steam, nib roasting, or liquor sterilization (achieving a 0-6 log reduction of Salmonella) were simulated. Based on the generic FAO/WHO Salmonella dose-response model and the chocolate consumption data in Belgium, salmonellosis risk per serving and cases per year at population level were estimated. When a 5 log reduction of Salmonella was achieved, the estimated mean risk per serving was 3.35 × 10-8 (95% CI: 3.27 × 10-10-1.59 × 10-7), and estimated salmonellosis cases per year (11.7 million population) was 88 (95% CI: <1-418). The estimated mean risk per serving was 3.35 × 10-9 (95% CI: 3.27 × 10-11-1.59 × 10-8), and the estimated salmonellosis cases per year was 9 (95% CI: <1-42), for a 6 log reduction. The current QMRA model solely considered Salmonella reduction in a single-step thermal treatment in the cocoa process. Inactivation obtained during other process steps (e.g. grinding) might occur but was not considered. As the purpose was to use QMRA as a tool to evaluate the log reduction in the cocoa processing, no postcontamination from the processing environment and ingredients was included. A minimum of 5 log reduction of Salmonella in the single-step thermal treatment of cocoa process was considered to be adequate.

Role and impact of a specialized cardiometabolic clinic in managing high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Background: Lipid-related risk and residual cardiovascular risk remain high in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Significant treatment gaps exist in implementation of pluripotent and effective therapies that reduce these risks. Objective: This study evaluates the efficacy and impact of a dedicated, standalone cardiometabolic clinic designed to address treatment gaps through streamlined management and optimization of treatment strategies. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the first 400 patients with T2D and ASCVD who underwent treatment at the clinic and presented for at least one follow-up visit. These patients were primarily managed for their cardiometabolic risks and received intensified lipid-lowering therapies, including adjunct non-statin therapies. Results: Significant findings included increased use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) to 84 % and 65 %, respectively, with 94 % of patients eventually on one therapy and 55 % on dual therapy. Increases in lipid-lowering therapies led to 89 % of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below patient-specific thresholds for intensification. Conclusion: This care model effectively manages high-risk patient needs, achieving significant intensification of lipid-lowering therapies and broad use of cardiometabolic drugs, and highlights the clinic's potential to serve as a model for similar high-risk populations.

Beyond quadruple therapy: the potential roles for ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Quadruple therapy is effective for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, providing significant clinical benefits, including reduced mortality. Clinicians are now in an era focused on how to initiate and titrate quadrable therapy in the early phase of the disease trajectory, including during heart failure hospitalization. However, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction still face a significant "residual risk" of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Despite the effective implementation of quadruple therapy, high mortality and rehospitalization rates persist in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and many patients cannot maximize therapy due to side effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. In this context, ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil may have adjunct roles in addition to quadruple therapy (note that omecamtiv mecarbil is not currently approved for clinical use). However, the contemporary use of ivabradine and vericiguat is relatively low globally, likely due in part to the under-recognition of the role of these therapies as well as costs. This review offers clinicians a straightforward guide for bedside evaluation of potential candidates for these medications. Quadruple therapy, with strong evidence to reduce mortality, should always be prioritized for implementation. As second-line therapies, ivabradine could be considered for patients who cannot achieve optimal heart rate control (≥ 70 bpm at rest) despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker dosing. Vericiguat could be considered for high-risk patients who have recently experienced worsening heart failure events despite being on quadrable therapy, but they should not have N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels exceeding 8000 pg/mL. In the future, omecamtiv mecarbil may be considered for severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and heart failure hospitalization within 6 months) when current quadrable therapy is limited, although this is still hypothesis-generating and requires further investigation before its approval.

The joint association of lipoprotein(a) and Lp-PLA2 with the risk of stroke recurrence.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently little is known about the joint association of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) with stroke recurrence. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter cohort study, 10,675 consecutive acute ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack patients (TIA) with Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 were enrolled. The association of stroke recurrence within 1 year with Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves. The interaction between Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 with stroke recurrence was evaluated by multiplicative and additive scales. RESULTS: A significant joint association of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 with the risk of stroke recurrence was observed. Multivariate cox regression analysis demonstrated that the combination of elevated Lp(a) (≥ 50 mg/dL) and Lp-PLA2 (≥175.1 ng/ml) was independently associated with the risk of stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42; 95 % CI: 1.15-1.76). Both significant multiplicative [(exp(ß3):1.63, 95 % CI: 1.17-2.29, P = 0.004] and additive interaction (RERI:0.55, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.90, P = 0.002; AP: 0.39, 95 %CI, 0.24-0.53) were observed between Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 have a joint association with the risk of stroke recurrence in IS/TIA patients. Patients with concomitant presence of elevated Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 have greater risk of stroke recurrence.

Relationship of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, in addition to C-reactive protein, with cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To quantify the relationship of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), independent of C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Patients with T2D from the UCC-SMART-cohort were studied using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. The relationship of NLR and CRP with vascular events (cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction and vascular death) and all-cause mortality was quantified. RESULTS: During 10,833 person-years, 232 vascular events and 302 deaths occurred in 1,239 patients with T2D. Risk of vascular events and all-cause mortality increased per standard deviation (SD) in NLR (hazard ratio (HR) 1.27; 95 % confidence interval (CI):1.11-1.46) and 1.15; 95 % CI:1.02-1.30) after adjustment for CRP. CRP was not associated with vascular events after adjustment for NLR, (HR per SD 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.90-1.19), but was associated with all-cause mortality (HR per SD 1.18; 95 % CI: 1.04-1.33). Notably, NLR was related to vascular events in patients with CRP < 2 mg/L (HR per unit 1.45; 95 % CI: 1.19-1.77). CONCLUSION: In patients with T2D, NLR is related to higher risk of CVD and all-cause mortality, independently from CRP. NLR is related to CVD even when CRP is low, indicating that NLR is a marker of CVD-risk in addition to CRP. Both NLR and CRP are independently related to all-cause mortality in T2D patients.

The residual risk of inflammation and remnant cholesterol in acute coronary syndrome patients on statin treatment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Residual risk assessment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after sufficient medical management remains challenging. The usefulness of measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and remnant cholesterol (RC) in assessing the level of residual inflammation risk (RIR) and residual cholesterol risk (RCR) for risk stratification in these patients needs to be evaluated. METHODS: Patients admitted for ACS on statin treatment who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March 2016 and March 2019 were enrolled in the analysis. The included patients were stratified based on the levels of hsCRP and RC during hospitalization. The primary outcome was ischemic events at 12 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary outcomes included 12-month all-cause death and cardiac death. RESULTS: Among the 5778 patients, the median hsCRP concentration was 2.60 mg/L and the median RC concentration was 24.98 mg/dL. The RIR was significantly associated with ischemic events (highest hsCRP tertile vs. lowest hsCRP tertile, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.30, P = 0.046), cardiac death (aHR: 1.77, 95% CI:1.02-3.07, P = 0.0418) and all-cause death (aHR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.24-3.24, P = 0.0048). The RCR was also significantly associated with these outcomes, with corresponding values for the highest tertile of RC were 1.81 (1.21-2.73, P = 0.0043), 2.76 (1.57-4.86, P = 0.0004), and 1.72 (1.09-2.73, P = 0.0208), respectively. The risks of ischemic events (aHR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.75-4.49, P < 0.0001), cardiac death (aHR: 4.10, 95% CI: 2.18-7.70, P < 0.0001), and all-cause death (aHR: 3.00, 95% CI, 1.73-5.19, P < 0.0001) were significantly greater in patients with both RIR and RCR (highest hsCRP and RC tertile) than in patients with neither RIR nor RCR (lowest hsCRP and RC tertile). Notably, the RIR and RCR was associated with an increased risk of ischemic events especially in patients with adequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) (Pinteraction=0.04). Furthermore, the RIR and RCR provide more accurate evaluations of risk in addition to the GRACE score in these patients [areas under the curve (AUC) for ischemic events: 0.64 vs. 0.66, P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: Among ACS patients receiving contemporary statin treatment who underwent PCI, high risks of both residual inflammation and cholesterol, as assessed by hsCRP and RC, were strongly associated with increased risks of ischemic events, cardiac death, and all-cause death.

Early, Intensive and Persistent Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

AIM: Early and intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C)-lowering therapy plays important roles in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the treatment period for further clinical benefit remains undefined. This single-center, retrospective study explored LDL-C trajectory after ACS and its associations with subsequent cardiovascular events (CVE). METHODS: In 831 patients with ACS, we evaluated LDL-C reduction during the first 2 months post-ACS as an index of early intervention and the area over the curve for LDL-C using 70 mg/dl as the threshold in the next 6 months (AOC-70) as a persistent intensity index. Patients were followed for a median of 3.0 (1.1-5.2) years for CVE, defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina pectoris requiring revascularization, cerebral infarction, and coronary bypass grafting. RESULTS: LDL-C decreased from baseline to 2 months post-ACS (107±38 mg/dl to 78±25 mg/dl, p＜0.001) through high-intensity statin prescription (91.8%), while achieving rates of LDL-C ＜70 mg/dl at 2 months remained only 40.2% with no significant changes thereafter. During the follow-up period, CVE occurred in 200 patients. LDL-C reduction during the first 2 months and AOC-70 in the next 6 months were both associated with subsequent CVE risk (sub-HR [hazard ratio] [95% confidence interval]: 1.48 [1.16-1.89] and 1.22 [1.05-1.44]). Furthermore, early intervention followed by persistently intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy resulted in further CVE risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The present study observed that achieving early and intensive LDL-C reduction within the first two months after ACS and maintaining it for the next six months suppressed subsequent CVE risk, suggesting the importance of early, intensive, and persistent LDL-C-lowering therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS.

New tatt? We're ok with that! Relaxing the tattoo deferral for plasmapheresis donors maintains safety and increases donations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tattooing is one of the leading donor deferral reasons in Australia. Until September 2020, donors were deferred from all donation types for 4 months after a tattoo. At this time, our guideline changed such that donations of plasma for further manufacture were accepted immediately, provided the tattoo was administered in a licensed or regulated Australian establishment. We examined the effects of this change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donors with a tattoo deferral in the 2 years before or after the guideline change were identified and followed up until 3 November 2022. Between the two periods, we compared blood-borne virus (BBV) incidence, donor return, and the number of donors and donations regained after deferral. RESULTS: The incidence of BBV infection in donors after a tattoo deferral was zero in both periods. To exceed a residual risk of 1 in 1 million for hepatitis C virus, 190 donors would need to be infected yearly from a tattoo. Donors returned to donate significantly faster after the change (median return 85 days compared with 278 days). An extra 187 donations per 10,000 person-years of observation were gained, yielding a total of 44,674 additional plasma donations nationally 0-4 months after getting a tattoo. CONCLUSION: Allowing plasma donations immediately post-tattoo resulted in a substantial donation gain with no adverse safety effect. Lifeblood subsequently reduced the deferral for transfusible component donations to 7 days for tattoos in Australian licensed/regulated establishments.

Atherosclerosis Residual Lipid Risk-Overview of Existing and Future Pharmacotherapies.

Patients with atherosclerotic disease remain at increased risk of future events despite receiving optimal medical treatment. This residual risk is widely heterogeneous, but lipoprotein particles and their content play a major role in determining future cardiovascular events. Beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), other lipoprotein particles have not demonstrated similar contribution to the progression of atherosclerosis. Statins, ezetimibe, and more recently, proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and bempedoic acid have confirmed the causal role of LDL-c in the development of atherosclerosis. Data on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) suggested a possible causal role for atherosclerosis; nonetheless, HDL-c-raising treatments, including cholesteryl-ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors and niacin, failed to confirm this relationship. On the other hand, mendelian randomisation revealed that triglycerides are more implicated in the development of atherosclerosis. Although the use of highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) was associated with a reduction in the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, this beneficial effect did not correlate with the reduction in triglycerides level and has not been consistent across large phase 3 trials. Moreover, other triglyceride-lowering treatments, such as fibrates, were not associated with a reduction in future cardiovascular risk. Studies assessing agents targeting angiopoietin-like 3 (lipoprotein lipase inhibitor) and apolipoprotein C3 antisense will add further insights into the role of triglycerides in atherosclerosis. Emerging lipid markers such as lipoprotein (a) and cholesterol efflux capacity may have a direct role in the progression of atherosclerosis. Targeting these biomarkers may provide incremental benefits in reducing cardiovascular risk when added to optimal medical treatment. This Review aims to assess available therapies for current lipid biomarkers and provide mechanistic insight into their potential role in reducing future cardiovascular risk.

Effects of icosapent ethyl according to baseline residual risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results from REDUCE-IT.

AIMS: Icosapent ethyl lowers triglycerides and significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), though treatment effects may vary between individuals. This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute effects of icosapent ethyl on MACE according to baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants from the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) with ASCVD were included (n = 5785). The primary outcome was 3-point MACE, i.e. non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Baseline 5-year risk of MACE was estimated using the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended SMART2 risk score. Modification of the relative treatment effects of icosapent ethyl by baseline risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, including a treatment-by-risk interaction. Next, treatment effects were assessed stratified by quartiles of baseline risk. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.2-5.3), MACE occurred in 361 vs. 489 patients in the icosapent ethyl vs. placebo group [95% confidence interval (CI)]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 (0.63-0.82), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.4% (2.6-6.2%), number needed to treat (NNT) 23 (16-38), and 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence reduction (CIR) 5.7% (3.5-7.9%). Icosapent ethyl significantly reduced MACE in all risk quartiles, with an HR (95% CI) of 0.62 (0.43-0.88), 0.66 (0.48-0.92), 0.69 (0.53-0.90), and 0.78 (0.63-0.96), respectively (P for treatment-by-risk interaction = 0.106). The ARR (95% CI) increased across risk quartiles, i.e. was 3.9% (1.0-6.8%), 4.3% (1.2-7.3%), 5.1% (1.4-8.7%), and 5.6% (1.3-10.0%), respectively. This translates to NNTs (95% CI) of 26 (15-98), 24 (14-84), 20 (11-70), and 18 (10-77). The 5-year CIR (95% CI) was 4.8% (1.3-8.2%), 5.0% (1.3-8.7%), 6.1% (1.7-10.5%), and 7.7% (2.3-13.2%), respectively. Consistent results were obtained for 5-point MACE, additionally including coronary revascularization and unstable angina. CONCLUSION: Among patients with ASCVD and elevated triglyceride levels, icosapent ethyl significantly reduces the risk of MACE irrespective of baseline CVD risk, though absolute benefits are largest for patients at the highest risk.

Unexplained Residual Risk In Type 2 Diabetes: How Big Is The Problem?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: What is new? Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2D) individuals. Of the major risk factors for CVD, less than 10% of T2D people meet the American Diabetes Association/American Heart Association recommended goals of therapy. The present review examines how much of the absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk in type 2 diabetes patients can be explained by major CV intervention trials. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple long-term cardiovascular (CV) intervention trials have examined the effect of specific target-directed therapies on the MACE endpoint. Only one prospective study, STENO-2, has employed a multifactorial intervention comparing intensified versus conventional treatment of modifiable risk factors in T2D patients, and demonstrated a 20% absolute CV risk reduction. If the absolute CV risk reduction in these trials is added to that in the only prospective multifactorial intervention trial (STENO-2), the unexplained CV risk is 44.1%. What are the clinical implications? Potential explanations for the unaccounted-for reduction in absolute CV risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients are discussed. HYPOTHESIS: failure to take into account synergistic interactions between major cardiovascular risk factors is responsible for the unexplained CV risk in T2D patients. Simultaneous treatment of all major CV risk factors to recommended AHA/ADA guideline goals is required to achieve the maximum reduction in CV risk.