Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove and the roman arch method for tibial tubercle lateralisation are reliable and distinguish between subjects with and without major patellar instability.

PURPOSE: Patellofemoral (PF) instability recurrence depends on several factors including the relative lateralisation of tibial tubercle (TT) regarding the trochlear groove (TG). TT relative lateralisation quantification has long been a topic of debate. Multiple measuring techniques have been described including TT-trochlear groove (TT-TG), TT-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) and TT-roman arch (TT-RA), with no clear consensus regarding the most reliable index or pathologic threshold. We set out to determine the normal value range of each index and their association with age, sex and PF instability status. Also, this study aims to determine a reliable pathologic distance threshold to effectively predict patellar dislocation. METHODS: Skeletally mature patients up to 45 years of age who presented a CT Scan and an MRI of the same knee between 2014 and 2018 were included and divided into subgroups based on history of PF instability. Three indexes (TT-TG, TT-PCL and TT-RA) were assessed by two independent observers blinded to instability history. ROC curves were performed for each index to obtain the cut point that better predicts instability. Univariate and multivariate models adjusted by age, sex, instability history and type of imaging technique were performed to test the influence of these variables. RESULTS: 208 patients were included. Mean age was 27.93 â€‹± â€‹8.48 years, 67.3% were female and 71 patients (34.1%) presented major instability history. Good or excellent inter and intraobserver reliability was found for all three indexes. All indexes presented significantly different distributions between subjects with and without major instability (p â€‹< â€‹0.001), except for TT-PCL. Different cut point values differing between imaging modalities were found: 11.4 â€‹mm for MRI TT-TG, 17 â€‹mm for CT TT-TG, 15.6 â€‹mm for MRI TT-RA and 18.2 â€‹mm for CT TT-RA. CONCLUSIONS: All indexes studied had good or excellent inter and intraobserver reliability. Measurements between imaging techniques (CT and MR) are not interchangeable. Both TT-TG and TT-RA correctly distinguish between subjects with and without major instability, while TT-PCL does not, recommending caution when evaluated on its own. Specific threshold values depending on imaging technique should be considered for surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Diagnostic Test.

Why are bone and soft tissue measurements of the TT-TG distance on MRI different in patients with patellar instability?

PURPOSE: To determine whether the tibial tuberosity-to-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) and patellar tendon-to-trochlear groove distance (PT-TG) are equal, whether the bony and cartilaginous points coincide in the trochlea, and whether the insertion of the PT coincides with the most anterior point of the TT in patients with patellar instability. METHODS: Fifty-three MRI scans of patients with patellar instability were examined. TT-TG and PT-TG were measured by three examiners in 31 knees. Additionally, the bone-cartilage distance in the trochlea [trochlear cartilage to trochlear bone (TC-TB)] and the distance between the mid-point of the PT insertion and the most anterior point of the TT (PT-TT) were measured by one examiner. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the measurements between the three examiners. The relationships between the measurements were determined, the means of the measurements were calculated, and the correlations between PT-TG and TT-TG, PT-TT, and TC-TB were assessed. RESULTS: The ICC was above 0.8. PT-TG was 3.7 mm greater than TT-TG. The TC and TB coincided in 73 % of cases, and the mean TC-TB was 0.3 mm. The PT was lateral to the TT in 94 % of the cases, and the mean PT-TT was 3.4 mm. The Pearson's correlation coefficients between PT-TG and TT-TG, PT-TT, and TC-TB were 0.946, 0.679, and 0.199, respectively. CONCLUSION: TT-TG underestimated PT-TG, primarily due to the lateralization of the PT insertion relative to the most anterior point of the TT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: our study shows that in patients with patellar instability, there are differences in the absolute values of TT-TG and PT-TG, as previously reported for patients without patellar instability. Hence, normal cut-off values based on case-control studies of TT-TG cannot be equivalently used when measuring PT-TG to indicate TT medialization in patients with patellar instability. It is also important to note that the clinical outcomes cannot be directly compared between patients evaluated using TT-TG versus PT-TG measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patellar Tendon-Trochlear Groove Angle Measurement: A New Method for Patellofemoral Rotational Analyses.

BACKGROUND: The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) is used as the gold standard for patellofemoral malalignment. PURPOSE: To assess 3 patellar tendon-trochlear groove (PT-TG) angle measurement techniques and the PT-TG distance measurement (tendinous cartilaginous TT-TG) as predictors of patellar instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Three PT-TG angle measurements and the PT-TG distance were measured in 82 participants with patellar instability and 100 controls using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Measurement landmarks were the line tangent to the posterior femoral condyles, the deepest point of the trochlea, the transepicondylar line, and the patellar tendon center. All measurements were recorded once by 1 examiner, and the measurements were recorded twice by 2 examiners in a random group of 100 knees. Mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were obtained. Normality cutoff values were defined as 2 and 3 SDs above the mean in the control group. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) were calculated. Inter- and intrarater reliability were assessed based on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The measurements from the patellar instability and control groups, respectively, for angle 1 (16.4° and 8.4°), angle 2 (31° and 15.6°), angle 3 (30.8° and 15.7°), PT-TG distance (14.5 and 8.4 mm), and patellar tilt (21.1° and 7.5°) were significantly different (P < .05). The angle measurements showed greater sensitivity, specificity, and LR+ than the PT-TG distance. Inter- and intrarater ICC values were >0.95 for all measurements. CONCLUSION: The PT-TG angle and the PT-TG distance are reliable and are different between the patellar instability and control groups. PT-TG angles are more closely associated with patellar instability than PT-TG distance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PT-TG angle measurements show high reliability and association with patellar instability and can aid in the assessment of extensor mechanism malalignment. A more sensitive and specific evaluation of extensor mechanism malalignment can improve patient care by preventing both redislocation and abnormal tracking of overlooked malalignment and complications of unnecessary tibial tuberosity medialization.