Complex elbow fracture-dislocations- what factors are associated with a poor post-operative outcome?

PURPOSE: Despite standardized treatment algorithms, patients with complex elbow fracture-dislocation frequently suffer from poor post-operative elbow function leading to reduced quality of life. Up to now, there is no valuable data regarding risk factors that lead to poor post-operative outcome after surgical reconstruction of complex elbow fracture-dislocations. METHODS: From 06/2010 to 12/2020 134 patients (51.3 ± 15.1 years, 44% women) undergoing surgical treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations could be included in this study. Follow-up period was 4.4 years (SD 2.5). All patients were clinically evaluated for elbow movement, elbow stability and common elbow scores (MEPS, OES, DASH-Score). Potential risk factors for poor post-operative outcome were identified using bi- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall good post-operative outcome has been achieved, mean MEPS was 88.8 ± 17.6. Post-operative complications occurred in 31.3% of the cases, while 25.4% required surgical revision. Patients with transolecranon dislocation fractures showed the significantly worst functional outcomes (p = 0.01). In addition, it has been shown that a patient's age of more than 70 years (OR = 10, p = 0.003) and a BMI of more than 35 kg/m2 (OR = 7.6, p = 0.004) are independent risk factors for a poor post-operative outcome. In contrast, gender and time to surgery showed no significant influence on post-operative outcome. CONCLUSION: In most cases, good post-operative functional results can be achieved using standardized treatment protocols. However, complication and revision rates remain high. Patients older than 70 years of age or with a BMI over 35 kg/m2 are at risk for an inferior outcome and require close follow-up monitoring.

Non-operative management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow; not so terrible?

Introduction: Terrible triad injuries (TTIs) of the elbow have traditionally been reported to have poor outcomes, hence requiring surgical stabilisation. We identified and reviewed patients with TTIs treated non-operatively within our department. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with TTI treated non-operatively with standardised elbow-instability rehabilitation from 2010 to 2020. We used Mason and Morrey classifications for radial head and coronoid fractures, respectively. Non-operative indications included a congruent joint on CT, significant co-morbidities pre-disposing to high-risk surgery and/or patient preference. Outcomes included Oxford Elbow Score (OES), ROM and complications. Results: Nineteen patients were included (mean age 49; 37% female). At an average of 6 years (range 2-11 years) post-treatment, mean OES was 46 ± 7. At last clinic review, mean 6 months (2-15), average ROM was 131 ± 11° flexion, 8 ± 10° extension, 85 ± 12° supination and 85 ± 13° pronation. One patient required arthrolysis and another had an incongruent ulnohumeral joint which developed clicking with a functional ROM. Conclusion: Our report suggests non-operatively managed and appropriately rehabilitated TTI injuries can achieve good function and ROM. We recommend conservative management as a viable option in cases with joint congruency and no mechanical block in patients with significant co-morbidities or those refusing surgery but patients must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Postoperative mobilization after terrible triad injury: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.

Postoperative Functional Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of the Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow.

Objective To evaluate the functional results of patients submitted to a surgical approach for the treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow, analyzing the treatment methods used and associated epidemiological variables. Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment for the terrible triad of the elbow from February 2018 to June 2020 at our service were evaluated. The identified sample consisted of 17 patients, but of these, only 13 completed all stages of the study and, therefore, were considered as the universe to be considered. Epidemiological information of interest was collected: age, sex, hand of dominance, affected side, characteristics and classification of injuries, trauma mechanism, time to surgery, type of procedure performed and range of motion. The Mason classification was used for radial head fractures and the Regan and Morrey classification for the coronoid process. In order to perform a functional analysis, the DASH and BRUCE questionnaires were applied. Results About 77% of the patients were male, 92% of the fracture mechanisms were due to high-energy trauma. Contrary to this, the predominance of the non-dominant side was observed as the most affected. Evaluating the results according to the time to start the treatment, the patients operated within 14 days had statistically better functional results. Conclusion Surgical treatment of TTIE generates acceptable functional results in most cases. The success of the treatment is related to the time interval between the trauma and the first surgery, in addition to the severity of the injuries.

Chronic Complex elbow fracture dislocation: Restoration of elbow function with ORIF and radial head replacement, a case report with long term follow up.

INTRODUCTION: The dislocation of the elbow joint to the posterior or postero-lateral region accompanied by fractures in the radial head or neck and coronoid process of the Ulna is known as a terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTI). IMPORTANCE: This injury presents as unique challenge for orthopedic surgeons due to elbow instability and stiffness, making the surgical intervention more difficult than usual. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old man suffered from polytrauma, including a pelvis fracture, a left humerus shaft fracture, and left ulna shaft fracture. An open reduction and internal fixation were administered as a treatment option. However, during a follow-up examination four months later, a missed fracture dislocation of the right elbow was discovered. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The complex surgery required open reduction of the chronic dislocated joint, release of the triceps, resection of the radial head, replacement, bone grafting of the coronoid, reconstruction of the coronoid, and application of a spanning external fixation. The injury was complex, consisting of coronoid fractures, olecranon, a proximal third of the Ulna, and radial head malunion with heterotrophic ossification around the elbow joint. CONCLUSION: After seven years, our patient had a full range of motion in elbow flexion with 20-25 lags in extension. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 100 and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 0.

Current concepts in the management of "Terrible Triad" injuries of the elbow.

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow are complex injuries which can result in long term complications and significant disability. They must be identified correctly, and managed appropriately in order to maximise functional outcomes. A clear understanding of the bony and ligamentous anatomy is essential to plan appropriate surgical reconstruction to provide elbow stability. Urgent reduction of the elbow, followed by 3-dimensional imaging and surgical repair or replacement of the injured structures is the mainstay of treatment in the majority of cases. This review presents a summary of the relevant anatomy and the evidence for the management of these complex injuries.

Comparison of different treatment approaches for coronoid process fracture in terrible triad injury: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the functional results of different treatment approaches for the fracture of the coronoid process in terrible triad injury (TTI). METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial included participants from seven level-1 trauma centres in China. All patients were randomly assigned to three groups, wherein different approaches were applied to treat coronoid fracture: group A) internal fixation of the coronoid process without external fixation or splint (ORIF group), B) external fixation using a hinged fixator without internal fixation (Exfix group), and C) long-arm plaster for two to three weeks postoperatively without internal fixation of coronoid process (Plaster group). Early active motion exercises within the limits of pain were started immediately after surgery under the supervision of a physical therapist. Outcomes were evaluated at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (22 patients in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 22 in Group C) were included in this trial from January 2016 to January 2019. The average arc of elbow motion was 114.1° ± 8.92°. The average flexion and flexion contracture were 126.4° ± 11.2° and 12.3° ± 7.7°, respectively. The arcs of forearm rotation of the elbow for each group were 145.41° ± 9.36°, 143.38° ± 9.79°, and 143.86° ± 10.95°, respectively. The MEPS for each group were 86.82 ± 9.7, 86.67 ± 9.92, and 85.23 ± 8.66, respectively. The DASH score for each group were 18.26 ± 19.31, 18.85 ± 15.02, and 20.19 ± 13.59, respectively. CONCLUSION: All three approaches in our trial showed similar functional results in the long-term survey. Patients treated with external fixation without internal fixation of the coronoid process showed less pain during early mobilization and acquired maximum flexion within a short duration after surgery.

Lateral elbow ligament reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability: 10 years follow-up in 32 patients.

Background: Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is the most frequent form of both acute and chronic elbow instability. It is due to mechanical incompetence of the lateral collateral ligament. O'Driscoll et al described treatment of this instability by autologous reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. The aim of our study was to evaluate the medium and long-term clinical, functional and radiological results of patients who were surgically treated for PLRI by this technique. We hypothesized that such ligament reconstruction restores a functional joint complex and durably stabilizes the elbow and limits the long-term risk of osteoarthritis. Methods: All patients treated for symptomatic PLRI by ligament reconstruction since January 1995 and who had a minimum follow-up of 36 months were retrospectively included. Results: Thirty-two patients (32 elbows) underwent clinical and radiological evaluation with a mean follow-up of 112 months (range, 36-265 months). The success rate of the procedure was 97% with one patient requiring revision reconstruction. Twenty-four patients (75%) were free from pain. Pain was significantly greater in patients with associated lesions (P = .03) and those with morbid obesity (body mass index ≥40) (P = .03). Twenty-nine (91%) patients had resumed their previous activities. Twenty-eight patients (87%) were satisfied or very satisfied. The mean Mayo Clinic score was 96/100 and the QuickDash 14.7/100. Two patients (6%) with accompanying lesions developed severe osteoarthritis. Conclusion: Elbow ligament reconstruction by the technique of O'Driscoll et al effectively restores stability and limits progression to osteoarthritis in the long term. The only failure in our series was due to several technical errors. Patients who had dislocation with associated lesions or morbid obesity are at risk of poorer functional results.

Using an Internal Joint Stabilizer Through a Single Posterior Approach for Elderly Patients With Terrible Triad Injury.

Introduction: Treating a terrible triad injury of the elbow remains a challenge for orthopedic surgeons, especially in elderly patients due to the poor quality of the surrounding soft tissue and bony structures. In the present study, we propose a treatment protocol using an internal joint stabilizer through a single posterior approach and analyze the clinical results. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 15 elderly patients with terrible triad injuries of the elbow who underwent our treatment protocol from January 2015 to December 2020. The surgery involved a posterior approach, identification of the ulnar nerve, bone and ligament reconstruction, and the application of the internal joint stabilizer. A rehabilitation program was initiated immediately after the operation. Surgery-related complications, elbow range of motion (ROM), and functional outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean follow-up period was 21.7 months (range, 16-36 months). ROM at the final follow-up was 130° in extension to flexion and 164° in pronation to supination. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 94 at the final follow-up. Major complications included breaking of the internal joint stabilizer in 2 patients, transient numbness over the ulnar nerve territory in one, and local infection due to irritation of the internal joint stabilizer in one. Conclusions: Although the current study involved only a small number of patients and the protocol comprised two stages of operation, we believe that such a technique may be a valuable alternative for the treatment of these difficult cases. Level of Clinical Evidence: 4.

Recognition of the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow using 3D-printed models.

AIMS: This study aimed to answer the following questions: do 3D-printed models lead to a more accurate recognition of the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow?; do 3D-printed models lead to a more reliable recognition of the pattern of these injuries?; and do junior surgeons benefit more from 3D-printed models than senior surgeons? METHODS: A total of 15 orthopaedic trauma surgeons (seven juniors, eight seniors) evaluated 20 complex elbow fractures for their overall pattern (i.e. varus posterior medial rotational injury, terrible triad injury, radial head fracture with posterolateral dislocation, anterior (trans-)olecranon fracture-dislocation, posterior (trans-)olecranon fracture-dislocation) and their specific characteristics. First, fractures were assessed based on radiographs and 2D and 3D CT scans; and in a subsequent round, one month later, with additional 3D-printed models. Diagnostic accuracy (acc) and inter-surgeon reliability (κ) were determined for each assessment. RESULTS: Accuracy significantly improved with 3D-printed models for the whole group on pattern recognition (acc2D/3D = 0.62 vs acc3Dprint= 0.69; Δacc = 0.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.14); p = 0.025). A significant improvement was also seen in reliability for pattern recognition with the additional 3D-printed models (κ2D/3D = 0.41 (moderate) vs κ3Dprint = 0.59 (moderate); Δκ = 0.18 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.22); p ≤ 0.001). Accuracy was comparable between junior and senior surgeons with the 3D-printed model (accjunior = 0.70 vs accsenior = 0.68; Δacc = -0.02 (95% CI -0.17 to 0.13); p = 0.904). Reliability was also comparable between junior and senior surgeons without the 3D-printed model (κjunior = 0.39 (fair) vs κsenior = 0.43 (moderate); Δκ = 0.03 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.10); p = 0.318). However, junior surgeons showed greater improvement regarding reliability than seniors with 3D-printed models (κjunior = 0.65 (substantial) vs κsenior = 0.54 (moderate); Δκ = 0.11 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.18); p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The use of 3D-printed models significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of recognizing the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow. However, the current long printing time and non-reusable materials could limit the usefulness of 3D-printed models in clinical practice. They could be suitable as a reusable tool for teaching residents.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):56-63.

The simulation of terrible triad injuries in fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens with intact soft tissue envelope.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to develop a technical process to reproducibly generate terrible triad injuries (TTI) in fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens, while leaving the skin intact. Such "pre-fractured" specimens, used for scientific analysis and for surgical education, might help to improve current treatment, which is complex and prone to complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To induce the desired fractures, a custom-made fracturing unit was used to apply an axial force on the extended cadaveric elbow specimens, with the forearm pronated and under valgus load. To simulate the valgus load, a pneumatic cylinder was developed to apply valgus stress to the joint by an additional force vector from the lateral side of the joint. RESULTS: The success rate of TTI induction was 92.3% (12/13). Of the 12 radial head fractures, 3 (25%) were classified Mason type II and 9 (75%) Mason type III. The coronoid fractures were grouped in tip subtype 2 (5 fractures, 41.7%), anteromedial facet (AMF) subtype 2 (4 fractures, 33.3%), AMF subtype 3 (1 fracture, 8.3%) and basal subtype 1 (2 fractures, 16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides an instrument for successful and reproducible production of dislocation fracture patterns with their typical accompanying soft tissue lesions. The methodology might be applied on a broad basis to be able to perform biomechanical studies regarding primary stability of fixation concepts for TTI and to educate surgeons in a fairly realistic scenario with the surgical treatment of TTI.

Postoperative Functional Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of the Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow / Avaliação funcional pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico da tríade terrível do cotovelo

Abstract Objective To evaluate the functional results of patients submitted to a surgical approach for the treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow, analyzing the treatment methods used and associated epidemiological variables. Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment for the terrible triad of the elbow from February 2018 to June 2020 at our service were evaluated. The identified sample consisted of 17 patients, but of these, only 13 completed all stages of the study and, therefore, were considered as the universe to be considered. Epidemiological information of interest was collected: age, sex, hand of dominance, affected side, characteristics and classification of injuries, trauma mechanism, time to surgery, type of procedure performed and range of motion. The Mason classification was used for radial head fractures and the Regan and Morrey classification for the coronoid process. In order to perform a functional analysis, the DASH and BRUCE questionnaires were applied. Results About 77% of the patients were male, 92% of the fracture mechanisms were due to high-energy trauma. Contrary to this, the predominance of the non-dominant side was observed as the most affected. Evaluating the results according to the time to start the treatment, the patients operated within 14 days had statistically better functional results. Conclusion Surgical treatment of TTIE generates acceptable functional results in most cases. The success of the treatment is related to the time interval between the trauma and the first surgery, in addition to the severity of the injuries.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar os resultados funcionais dos pacientes submetidos a abordagem cirúrgica para o tratamento da tríade terrível do cotovelo, analisando os métodos de tratamento utilizados e variáveis epidemiológicas associadas. Métodos Foram avaliados pacientes submetidos aotratamento cirúrgico de tríade terrível do cotovelo de fevereiro de 2018 a junho de 2020 em nosso serviço. A amostra identificada foi de 17 pacientes, mas destes apenas 13 concluíram todas as etapas das pesquisas e por isso foram considerados como o universo a ser levado em consideração. Coletou-se informações epidemiológicas de interesse: idade, sexo, dominância, lado acometido, características e classificações das lesões, mecanismo do trauma, tempo para cirurgia, tipo de procedimento realizado e o arco de movimento. Foi utilizada a classificação de Mason para a fratura de cabeça do rádio e a de Regan e Morrey, para o processo coronoide. A fim de realizar uma análise funcional, aplicou-se os questionários de DASH e BRUCE. Resultados Cerca de 77% dos pacientes foram do sexo masculino, 92% dos mecanismos de fratura foram por trauma de alta energia. Contrariamente a esta, observou-se a predominância do lado não dominante como o mais afetado. Avaliando os resultados de acordo com o tempo para início do tratamento, os pacientes operados em até 14 dias obtiveram resultados funcionais estatisticamente melhores. Conclusão O tratamento cirúrgico da TTC gera resultados funcionais aceitáveis na maioria dos casos. O sucesso do tratamento está relacionado ao intervalo de tempo entre o trauma e a primeira cirurgia, além de se relacionar com a gravidade das lesões.

Anteroposterior Cannulated Screw Fixation of Coronoid Fractures in Terrible Triad Injuries: A Simple Syringe-guided Technique.

OBJECTIVE: The fixation of the coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries is quite challenging. In this study, we introduce a minimally invasive technique using a syringe as a guide for insertion of the cannulated screw in an anterior to posterior fashion to fix the coronoid fracture in patients with terrible triad injuries. METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical data of patients suffering from terrible triad injuries between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed. Fifteen patients with an average age of 38.2 years old (21-56 years) were enrolled in this study, of which 12 were males and three were females. The Regan-Morrey type II and type III coronoid fractures in these patients were treated with cannulated screws, inserted anteriorly using a 1 mL syringe as a guide. Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, stability and daily function using Mayo Elbow Performance scores (MEPs). The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were used for evaluating a healing fracture. RESULTS: After a mean follow up of 44.2 months (range 13-80), the mean elbow flexion was 128.2°, extension was 12.3°, forearm pronation was 74.6° and supination was 73.6°. A concentric reduction was maintained without severe pain, stiffness, and radiographic evidence of instability in all patients during the follow-up period. The mean MEPs was 89.7 points. CONCLUSION: The anteroposterior cannulated screw fixation via simple syringe guide is a minimally invasive and safe option for surgical treatment of coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries.

Radial head arthroplasty vs. open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis update.

Terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE) is a severe high-energy injury to the elbow, mainly including elbow dislocation, coronoid fracture and radial head fracture. It is difficult to maintain the stability of the elbow joint using traditional conservative treatment, and there is a high risk of redislocation and various complications. Therefore, surgical treatment is currently advocated, mainly for repairing damaged ligaments and reconstructing bony structures, but there is still controversy about the treatment plan for the radial head. The current meta-analysis was conducted to compare the differences in efficacy of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of TTIE. Published literature related to the treatment (either ORIF or RHA) of TTIE was searched for in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. According to the search strategy, a total of 1,928 related publications were retrieved. The patient must have been diagnosed with TTIE and required surgery on the radial head. The interventions were RHA and ORIF. Non-case-control studies, case reports, review articles, letters, duplicate reports and literature without sufficient relevant data were excluded. The quality of the literature was evaluated according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology and the Jadad scale. After data extraction, meta-analysis was performed using ReviewManager 5.4 software (Cochrane). A total of 15 studies involving 455 patients (189 who underwent RHA and 266 who underwent ORIF) were included. Range of motion (ROM) of the forearm (pronation-supination arc) after surgery in the RHA group [95% CI (0.28, 9.59); P=0.04] was found to be significantly superior to the ORIF group, with a lower incidence of complications [95% CI (0.22, 0.84); P=0.01]. However, there was no statistically significant difference for the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score nor for ROM of the elbow (flexion-extension arc). Overall, compared with the ORIF group, the RHA group had better forearm rotational ROM and fewer complications after surgery. Therefore, RHA was found to be superior to ORIF in the treatment of TTIE.

Surgical fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures via mesh plate: A case report.

Introduction: The coronoid process of the ulna is the primary stabilizer of the elbow joint. There has not yet been an accurate off-the-shelf dedicated implant because fragments of coronoid process fractures are often small and diverse. The variable angle locking compression mesh plate 2.4/2.7 (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) acts as a versatile, low-profile implant that can be cut to suit the specific fracture pattern and fits anatomically. Case presentations: We report two cases of Regan-Morrey type II ulnar coronoid process fractures in terrible triad elbow injuries. In both cases, persistent instability was fluoroscopically diagnosed after repair of the lateral structures. We performed osteosynthesis for the ulnar coronoid process fractures using a mesh plate, which we cut into a rhombus-like shape and used as a buttress plate. Here we report the good results obtained thereof. Conclusion: Considering our positive experience with using mesh plates, the mesh plate may be a good method of fixation for ulnar coronoid process fractures.

Posterior (Boyd) approach to terrible triad injuries.

BACKGROUND: A 'terrible triad injury of the elbow' (TTIE) refers to an injury pattern involving posterior dislocation of the ulnohumeral joint, fracture of the radial head, and fracture of the coronoid process of the ulna. It is a complex injury to the elbow joint and can result in long-term elbow instability, pain, stiffness, and arthritis. In specific cases, it may be treated conservatively, but in most circumstances, surgical stabilization is advised.The 'drop sign' is an objective static radiographically measured ulnohumeral distance of ≥4 mm seen intraoperatively and postoperatively. Although controversial, it may portend postoperative instability and arthritis. The senior author repairs these injuries in a standardized fashion through a modified Boyd rather than a lateral approach. Our aim was to assess the number of cases demonstrating an intraoperative drop sign after surgical treatment of a TTIE with this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 22 consecutive patients with 23 acute TTIEs. These injuries were treated by a single surgeon using a modified Boyd (posterior) approach to the elbow. Intraoperative image intensifier x-rays were analyzed by the two authors to assess for a 'drop sign'. RESULTS: None of the 23 cases had 'drop signs' on intraoperative imaging after stabilization. No patient has redislocated, underwent reoperation, or had symptoms of instability at follow-up. CONCLUSION: None of our patient cohort had an intraoperative 'drop sign' after standardized stabilization for a TTIE injury using a modified Boyd approach.

Management of Geriatric Elbow Injury.

Approximately 4.1% of all fractures in the elderly involve the elbow. Most elbow injuries in geriatric patients occur as the result of low-energy mechanisms such as falls from standing height. Elbow injuries in elderly patients present complex challenges because of insufficient bone quality, comminution, articular fragmentation, and preexisting conditions, such as arthritis. Medical comorbidities and baseline level of function must be heavily considered in surgical decision making.

Analysis of Fracture Characteristic and Medial Collateral Ligament Injury Relationships in Terrible Triad Elbow Injuries.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to identify the relationship between fracture characteristics and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries in terrible triad injuries of the elbow. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 60 patients who underwent surgery for terrible triad elbow injuries were retrospectively reviewed. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments, patients were stratified into those who had intact or low-grade partial MCL tears (low-grade MRI-MCL group) and those who had high-grade partial or full-thickness MCL tears (high-grade MRI-MCL group). We also analyzed patients according to whether they underwent MCL repair surgery. Fractures of the radial head were assessed according to Mason's classification system and measurements of fracture fragment arc on axial cuts. Fractures of the coronoid processes were assessed according to the system of Regan and Morrey and measurements of coronoid process volumes. RESULTS: Patients in the high-grade MRI-MCL group (28 patients) had a more comminuted and higher fragment arc of radial head fractures than those in the low-grade MRI-MCL group (32 patients) (143º ± 45º vs 119º ± 31º). However, the volume of coronoid fracture fragments was smaller in the high-grade MRI-MCL than in the low-grade MRI-MCL group (359 ± 325 mm3 vs 722 ± 448 mm3). The MCL repair group (22 patients) also had a more comminuted and higher fragment arc in radial head fractures (153º ± 44º vs 117º ± 31º) and a smaller coronoid process fracture volume (236 ± 224 mm3 vs 735 ± 419 mm3) than the non-MCL repair group (38 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that high-grade MCL injuries are associated with comminuted and larger-sized radial head fractures, as well as smaller-sized coronoid process fractures in terrible triad injuries. In making a decision regarding surgical treatment, these fracture characteristics could help to predict the severity for MCL injury in terrible triad injuries. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.