Bi-weekly irinotecan is an effective and convenient regimen in the treatment of relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite initial dramatic responses, metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) invariably recurs. Irinotecan is one of the active agents for patients with recurrent SCLC. In the second line, weekly or three-weekly irinotecan regimens have been adopted, however, the optimal dose and schedule is not defined. In our institution, we use a bi-weekly regimen of irinotecan. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the bi-weekly irinotecan in the second- or third-line treatment of SCLC patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of advanced stage SCLC patients who were followed at Hacettepe University Cancer Institute between January 2007 and March 2021 and received salvage irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks, following progression after platinum-etoposide treatment. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. At diagnosis, nineteen patients (19%) had limited stage and 81 patients (81%) had extensive stage SCLC. Objective response rates (ORR) were 44.6% and 46.2% for patients who received irinotecan treatment in second line, and in third line, respectively. Seventeen percent of all the patients had grade 3 and above adverse events during irinotecan treatment. In our study, 45.8% of patients were able to complete at least 6 cycles of irinotecan treatment and 69.8% were able to receive at least 3 cycles of irinotecan treatment without any dose interruption or reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks appears to be safe and effective in the 2nd- and 3rd-line treatment of advanced stage SCLC. Bi-weekly administration allows G-CSF prophylaxis in between doses, leading to an uninterrupted administration.

Not all types of depressed patients who persist with their antidepressant treatment improve in side effect complaints: A comparison of treatment completers and dropouts in the STAR*D trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a "traditional belief" that antidepressant side effect complaints improve with medication persistence; however, support for this theory has remained inconclusive. We aimed to examine if side effect complaints improved over time by modeling the relationship between side effect complaints and time at dropout for patients receiving citalopram during the first level of acute treatment in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. METHODS: We categorized the 2833 patients into five patterns by week of dropout. We used pattern-mixture modeling to model change in side effect complaints (frequency, intensity, and burden) over the 12-week course of treatment, while accounting for attrition and depressive severity. Using post-hoc linear contrasts, we compared the attrition patterns with the completers' pattern for severity of side effect complaints at each respective last visit prior to dropout as well as averaged side effect complaints across the duration of treatment. We also reported frequencies and tolerability of side effects for nine organ/function systems over the course of treatment. RESULTS: Patients who dropped out early exhibited worsening side effect burden and patients who dropped out later showed improvements in side effect frequency and intensity. Treatment completers improved in all side effect complaints over the course of treatment. Early attrition patterns had more severe side effect complaints for both tests of post-hoc linear contrasts than later attrition patterns and completers. CONCLUSIONS: Side effect complaints from antidepressant treatment improve over time, but only for some types of patients. As a precaution for early dropout, clinicians should monitor patients who exhibit worsening and more severe side effect complaints-especially in the first 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment. In addition, clinicians may want to consider changing the type of treatment early on for these patients, rather than encouraging them to persist with their current medication.

Short-term safety and tolerability profile of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine in human subjects: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Introduction: Psychedelic agents have regained the attention of pharmaceutical companies as promising treatments for depressive episodes. 5-Methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT), an atypical psychedelic, is emerging as a potentially effective, novel rapid-acting antidepressant. In this systematic review, we analyze the safety and tolerability evidence from clinical trials. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, electronic databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and EBSCO) were searched from inception until 15 May 2024 to identify clinical trials (regardless of phase) reporting on short-term safety and tolerability profile of 5-MeO-DMT using the following keywords in various combinations: 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine, 5-MeO-DMT, safety, adverse, adverse reaction, side effects, tolerability, dropout, healthy volunteer, healthy participant, depression, major depressive disorder. Only studies written in English were considered. Results: Initial search yielded 100 records, out of which 3 met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported on the results from clinical trial phases I and I/II, with a total of 78 participants included; two studies involved healthy volunteers, and one included patients with treatment-resistant depression. Although the data is limited, it confirms a good short-term safety and tolerability profile for 5-MeO-DMT, with no serious adverse events (SAEs) reported. Furthermore, no drop-outs were reported. Conclusion: 5-MeO-DMT administration in human subjects presents favorable short-term safety and tolerability profile. Importantly, no SAEs have been documented, and no adverse events led to participant withdrawal from the studies There is a need for future randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with larger samples and follow-up to assess potential chronic adverse events.

Penile compression devices for the treatment of urinary incontinence: current status and future prospects.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence (UI), especially stress UI, is common after prostatectomy. Penile compression devices (PCDs) may be a safe, tolerable option for conservative management in men who are not candidates for or not interested in surgical intervention for their UI. AREAS COVERED: This article examines the epidemiology of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI), and options for management. All available studies on PCDs are explored, including those on biomechanics, safety, tolerability, and user experience. History, availability of PCDs, and areas for future development are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: PCDs are an option for conservative management of PPI. They are recommended for those men without impairment in cognition, dexterity, or sensation. They should be worn for short periods of time and are best used during situations when incontinence might be precipitated. Overall, data suggest they are well tolerated and effective when tested, but large randomized comparative trials and studies of long-term use with relevant patient reported outcome measures are lacking. More studies are needed on commercially available PCDs. Biomechanical studies suggest that there are superior designs and materials both for efficacy and tolerability. With an aging population, and more older men going for prostate surgery, a larger market for these devices is likely.

Safety and tolerability of tirbanibulin ointment 1% treatment on 100 cm2 of the face or scalp in patients with actinic keratosis: A phase 3 study.

Background: Tirbanibulin is approved for actinic keratosis (AK) field treatment up to 25 cm2. However, AK often affects larger areas; thus, AK treatments for larger fields are needed. Objective: Evaluate the safety and tolerability of tirbanibulin when applied to a field of approximately 100 cm2. Methods: Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study among adult patients having a treatment field on the face or balding scalp of approximately 100 cm2 with 4-12 AKs. Patients received tirbanibulin to cover the treatment field once daily (5 consecutive days). Safety was assessed by evaluating treatment emergent adverse events and tolerability by composite score of 6 local tolerability signs (LTS). Results: A total of 105 patients were included. The most common LTS were erythema (96.1%) and flaking/scaling (84.4%), being mostly mild-to-moderate severity, and resolved/returned to or close to baseline by Day 29. The only severe LTS were erythema (5.8%) and flaking/scaling (8.7%). Most frequent treatment emergent adverse events were application site pruritus (10.5%) and application site pain (8.6%). Mean total number of AKs decreased from 7.7 AKs at baseline to 1.8 AKs at Day 57. Mean percent of change (reduction) from baseline in lesion count was 77.8% at Day 57. Limitations: No control group. No long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Safety and tolerability profiles in patients treated with tirbanibulin up to 100 cm2 were consistent with those previously reported over smaller field. Tirbanibulin could be used on a larger field (>25 cm2).

Assessment of prolonged safety and tolerability of erenumab in migraine patients in a long-term open-label study (APOLLON).

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of human monoclonal antibody erenumab used for migraine prophylaxis have been shown in clinical studies. APOLLON is an open-label, multi-center, single arm study, which permits dose adjustments of erenumab and includes an option for a drug holiday. The findings contribute to the accumulating long-term evidence regarding erenumab's tolerability and safety profile in individuals experiencing episodic and chronic migraines. METHODS: The study population consisted of adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine, who had successfully completed the HER-MES study (NCT03828539). Patients were treated with erenumab for 128 weeks at a flexible dose of either 70 mg or 140 mg. Treatment discontinuation attempts were allowed as voluntary single treatment interruption ('drug holiday') of up to 24 weeks. RESULTS: 701 patients were enrolled in APOLLON. The exposure associated incidence rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) (N = 601) per 100 subject years was 101.71 (95% CI [92.28; 111.14]) meaning a patient could expect having about one adverse event per each year of treatment. EAIR was higher in females (n = 524, EAIR: 104.40, 95% CI [93.93; 114.86]) than in males (n = 77, EAIR: 86.55, 95% CI [65.39; 107.71]) and increased with initial monthly migraine days (MMD) and prior prophylactic treatment failures. A total of 155 patients discontinued erenumab treatment during open-label treatment phase. Of these, 29 were due to AEs (4.1% of total cohort) and out of these 65.5% (N = 19) were considered treatment-related. Safety parameters were in line with HER-MES data and did not reveal new safety signals. Drug holidays were realized by 108 patients (15.4%), of which 64.8% (N = 70) returned to treatment. The mean number of monthly headache days (MHDs), MMDs, and days with acute headache medication significantly increased during drug holiday. After resumption of erenumab treatment, a rapid reduction of the migraine parameters was observed. CONCLUSIONS: APOLLON provides long-term safety and tolerability data confirming the beneficial safety profile of erenumab over a period of 128 weeks. In addition, reversibility of migraine deterioration during drug holiday was shown and most patients returned to their treatment with similar response rates compared to initial treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04084314 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04084314 ), First submitted: 2019-09-06.

MEDI1814 selectively reduces free Aß42 in cerebrospinal fluid of non-clinical species and Alzheimer's disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: Small molecules and antibodies are being developed to lower amyloid beta (Aß) peptides. METHODS: We describe MEDI1814, a fully human high-affinity monoclonal antibody selective for Aß42, the pathogenic self-aggregating species of Aß. RESULTS: MEDI1814 reduces free Aß42 without impacting Aß40 in the cerebrospinal fluid of rats and cynomolgus monkeys after systemic administration. MEDI1814 administration to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 57) in single or repeat doses up to 1800 mg intravenously or 200 mg subcutaneously was associated with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. No cases of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities were observed. Predictable dose-proportional changes in serum exposures for MEDI1814 were observed across cohorts. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis demonstrated central nervous system penetration of MEDI1814. Pharmacodynamic data showed dose-dependent suppression of free Aß42, increases in total (bound and free) Aß42, but no change in total Aß40 in CSF across doses. DISCUSSION: MEDI1814 offers a differentiated approach to impacting Aß in AD via selective reduction of free Aß42.

Menopause and its impact on the effectiveness of fremanezumab for migraine prophylaxis: post-hoc analysis of a prospective, real-world Greek registry.

OBJECTIVE: This post-hoc analysis of data extracted from a prospective study aimed to explore for the first time if the efficacy of fremanezumab in preventing difficult-to-treat migraine, according to ICHD-III, would differ between pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. METHODS: A total of 171 (aged 18-70 years) fremanezumab-treated female migraine patients for six consecutive months were classified to those at pre-menopausal (n = 82) or post-menopausal (n = 89). Monthly headache days (MHD), disability, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were assessed at baseline and at week 24 post-fremanezumab within subgroups and were then compared between them. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: In both groups, fremanezumab demonstrated significant reductions in MHDs, reduced disability, and higher QOL scores at week 24 post-treatment, compared to baseline. However, the between-subgroup comparison documented that pre-menopausal women and those at post-menopausal comparably benefited with significant reductions in overall MHDs (p = 0.883). Less disability, according to MIDAS (p = 0.696) and HIT-6 scores (p = 0.912), as well as higher QOL scores at week 24 post-fremanezumab, were also comparably evident in both groups. Safety was excellent across both subgroups. CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab can be considered a very effective treatment option for preventing migraines in difficult-to-treat women, aged 18-70 years, regardless of their menopausal status.

"Anything that would help is a positive development": feasibility, tolerability, and user experience of smartphone-based digital phenotyping for people with and without type 2 diabetes.

Background: Digital phenotyping, the in-situ collection of passive (phone sensor) and active (daily surveys) data using a digital device, may provide new insights into the complex relationship between daily behaviour and mood for people with type 2 diabetes. However, there are critical knowledge gaps regarding its use in people with type 2 diabetes. This study assessed feasibility, tolerability, and user experience of digital phenotyping in people with and without type 2 diabetes after participation in a 2-month digital phenotyping study in Ireland. At study completion, participants rated methodology elements from "not a problem" to a "serious problem" on a 5-point scale and reported their comfort with the potential future use of digital phenotyping in healthcare, with space for qualitative expansion. Results: Eighty-two participants completed baseline. Attrition was 18.8%. Missing data ranged from 9-44% depending on data stream. Sixty-eight participants (82.9%) completed the user experience questionnaire (51.5% with type 2 diabetes; 61.8% female; median age-group 50-59). Tolerability of digital phenotyping was high, with "not a problem" being selected 76.5%-89.7% of the time across questions. People with type 2 diabetes (93.9%) were significantly more likely to be comfortable with their future healthcare provider having access to their digital phenotyping data than those without (53.1%), χ2 (1) = 14.01, p = < .001. Free text responses reflected a range of positive and negative experiences with the study methodology. Conclusions: An uncompensated, 2-month digital phenotyping study was feasible among people with and without diabetes, with low attrition and reasonable missing data rates. Participants found digital phenotyping to be acceptable, and even enjoyable. The potential benefits of digital phenotyping for healthcare may be more apparent to people with type 2 diabetes than the general population. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-024-00116-6.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Psychedelics in Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD).

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder, associated with substantial burden and large economical costs. Notwithstanding various conventional antidepressant treatment options, a large portion of depressed people (ca. 30%) fails to respond to first-line treatment, resulting in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although non-response to multiple antidepressant interventions is a common outcome, a consensus definition of TRD is not yet available. In practice, TRD is applied when two or more successive treatments with different antidepressants are not working. The last decade's intense research into new medicines for TRD has led to two developments, using typical or serotonergic (psilocybin, ayahuasca) and atypical (glutamatergic) psychedelics (ketamine, esketamine). Both approaches, although via different entrance mechanism, exhibit a fast onset but also long-lasting antidepressant effect far beyond the biological presence of the drug in the body, strongly indicating that downstream mechanisms activated by signaling cascades in the brain are involved. The present chapter describes the clinical development of psilocybin and esketamine for TRD and discusses the problems involved in the use of a proper placebo because of the psychotomimetic (psilocybin) or dissociative (ketamine) effects that interfere with performing "blind" studies. Nevertheless, intranasal esketamine was developed and approved for TRD, whereas psilocybin has shown positive results. Adverse effects and tolerability of both drugs in the dose ranges used are generally acceptable. The emergence of anti-TRD medicines for treatment of a very severe disease is a breakthrough in psychiatry.