A Novel REBOA Training Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a potentially life-saving intervention to treat noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Traditionally, REBOA use has been limited to surgeons. However, emergency physicians are often the first point-of-contact and are well-versed in obtaining rapid vascular access and damage control resuscitation, making them ideal candidates for REBOA training. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To fill this gap, we designed and evaluated a REBOA training curriculum for emergency medicine (EM) residents. METHODS: Participants enrolled in an accredited 4-year EM residency program (N = 11) completed a 12-hour REBOA training course. Day 1 included lectures, case studies, and hands-on training using REBOA task trainers and perfused cadavers. Day 2 included additional practice and competency evaluations. Assessments included a 25-item written knowledge exam, decision-making on case studies, REBOA placement success, and time-to-placement. Participants returned at 4 months to assess long-term retention. Data were analyzed using t-tests and nonparametric statistics at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Scores on a 25-item multiple choice test significantly increased from pre-training (65% ± 5%) to post-training (92% ± 1%), p < 0.001. On Day 2, participants scored 100% on correct recognition of REBOA indications and scored 100% on correct physical placement of REBOA. Exit surveys indicated increased preparedness, confidence, and support for incorporating this course into EM training. Most importantly, REBOA knowledge, correct recognition of REBOA indications, and correct REBOA placement skills were retained by the majority of participants at 4 months. CONCLUSION: This course effectively teaches EM residents the requisite skills for REBOA competence and proper placement. This study could be replicated at other facilities with larger, more diverse samples, aiming to expand the use of REBOA in emergency physicians and reducing preventable deaths in trauma.

Torso hemorrhage: noncompressible? never say never.

Since limb bleeding has been well managed by extremity tourniquets, the management of exsanguinating torso hemorrhage (TH) has become a hot issue both in military and civilian medicine. Conventional hemostatic techniques are ineffective for managing traumatic bleeding of organs and vessels within the torso due to the anatomical features. The designation of noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) marks a significant step in investigating the injury mechanisms and developing effective methods for bleeding control. Special tourniquets such as abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet and SAM junctional tourniquet designed for NCTH have been approved by FDA for clinical use. Combat ready clamp and junctional emergency treatment tool also exhibit potential for external NCTH control. In addition, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) further provides an endovascular solution to alleviate the challenges of NCTH treatment. Notably, NCTH cognitive surveys have revealed that medical staff have deficiencies in understanding relevant concepts and treatment abilities. The stereotypical interpretation of NCTH naming, particularly the term noncompressible, is the root cause of this issue. This review discusses the dynamic relationship between TH and NCTH by tracing the development of external NCTH control techniques. The authors propose to further subdivide the existing NCTH into compressible torso hemorrhage and NCTH' (noncompressible but REBOA controllable) based on whether hemostasis is available via external compression. Finally, due to the irreplaceability of special tourniquets during the prehospital stage, the authors emphasize the importance of a package program to improve the efficacy and safety of external NCTH control. This program includes the promotion of tourniquet redesign and hemostatic strategies, personnel reeducation, and complications prevention.

Efficacy of partial and complete resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the hemorrhagic shock model of liver injury.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can temporarily control traumatic bleeding. However, its prolonged use potentially leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Partial REBOA (pREBOA) can alleviate ischemic burden; however, its security and effectiveness prior to operative hemorrhage control remains unknown. Hence, we aimed to estimate the efficacy of pREBOA in a swine model of liver injury using an experimental sliding-chamber ballistic gun. METHODS: Twenty Landrace pigs were randomized into control (no aortic occlusion) (n=5), intervention with complete REBOA (cREBOA) (n=5), continuous pREBOA (C-pREBOA) (n=5), and sequential pREBOA (S-pREBOA) (n=5) groups. In the cREBOA and C-pREBOA groups, the balloon was inflated for 60 min. The hemodynamic and laboratory values were compared at various observation time points. Tissue samples immediately after animal euthanasia from the myocardium, liver, kidneys, and duodenum were collected for histological assessment using hematoxylin and eosin staining. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the survival rate of the REBOA groups was prominently improved (all P<0.05). The total volume of blood loss was markedly lower in the cREBOA group (493.14±127.31 mL) compared with other groups (P<0.01). The pH was significantly lower at 180 min in the cREBOA and S-pREBOA groups (P<0.05). At 120 min, the S-pREBOA group showed higher alanine aminotransferase (P<0.05) but lower blood urea nitrogen compared with the cREBOA group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In this trauma model with liver injury, a 60-minute pREBOA resulted in improved survival rate and was effective in maintaining reliable aortic pressure, despite persistent hemorrhage. Extended tolerance time for aortic occlusion in Zone I for non-compressible torso hemorrhage was feasible with both continuous partial and sequential partial measures, and the significant improvement in the severity of acidosis and distal organ injury was observed in the sequential pREBOA.

Efficacy of partial and complete resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the hemorrhagic shock model of liver injury / 世界急诊医学杂志（英文）

@#BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can temporarily control traumatic bleeding. However, its prolonged use potentially leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Partial REBOA (pREBOA) can alleviate ischemic burden; however, its security and effectiveness prior to operative hemorrhage control remains unknown. Hence, we aimed to estimate the efficacy of pREBOA in a swine model of liver injury using an experimental sliding-chamber ballistic gun. METHODS: Twenty Landrace pigs were randomized into control (no aortic occlusion) (n=5), intervention with complete REBOA (cREBOA) (n=5), continuous pREBOA (C-pREBOA) (n=5), and sequential pREBOA (S-pREBOA) (n=5) groups. In the cREBOA and C-pREBOA groups, the balloon was inflated for 60 min. The hemodynamic and laboratory values were compared at various observation time points. Tissue samples immediately after animal euthanasia from the myocardium, liver, kidneys, and duodenum were collected for histological assessment using hematoxylin and eosin staining. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the survival rate of the REBOA groups was prominently improved (all P<0.05). The total volume of blood loss was markedly lower in the cREBOA group (493.14±127.31 mL) compared with other groups (P<0.01). The pH was significantly lower at 180 min in the cREBOA and S-pREBOA groups (P<0.05). At 120 min, the S-pREBOA group showed higher alanine aminotransferase (P<0.05) but lower blood urea nitrogen compared with the cREBOA group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In this trauma model with liver injury, a 60-minute pREBOA resulted in improved survival rate and was effective in maintaining reliable aortic pressure, despite persistent hemorrhage. Extended tolerance time for aortic occlusion in Zone I for non-compressible torso hemorrhage was feasible with both continuous partial and sequential partial measures, and the significant improvement in the severity of acidosis and distal organ injury was observed in the sequential pREBOA.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) prior to interfacility transfer: Who might benefit in a statewide trauma system?

BACKGROUND: Rural trauma patients are often seen at lower-level trauma centers before transfer and have higher mortality than those seen initially at a Level 1 Trauma Center. This study aims to describe the potential for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) to bridge this mortality gap. METHODS: We queried the Arizona Trauma Registry between 2014 and 2017 for hypotensive patients who were later transported to a level 1 center. REBOA candidates were identified as those with injuries consistent with major infra-diaphragmatic torso hemorrhage as the likely cause of death. RESULTS: Of 17,868 interfacility transfers during the study period, 333 met inclusion criteria and had sufficient data for evaluation. 26 of the 333 patients were identified as REBOA candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that REBOA may be an effective means to extend survivability to those severely injured trauma patients needing interfacility transfer to a higher level of care.

Balón de resucitación aórtico endovascular (REBOA) para el control de la hemorragia no compresible de torso. Revisión de la evidencia

La hemorragia no compresible de torso continúa siendo unas de las principales causas de mortalidad del paciente víctima de trauma. El control de este tipo de sangrado requiere de procedimientos invasivos como la toracotomía de reanimación, la cual se realiza en el paciente in extremis. La utilización de REBOA se re-introduce desde el 2011, como una forma de oclusión endovascular de la aorta y con el tiempo ya forma parte de los implementos con que cuenta un centro de trauma nivel I. Actualmente REBOA se utiliza dentro del proceso de reanimación, mientras se realiza el control definitivo de un sangrado en el torso, con el fin de aumentar la perfusión de órganos como cerebro y corazón, existiendo dos zonas principales de oclusión a nivel aórtico. Múltiples investigaciones se han realizado para encontrar las indicaciones y beneficios de REBOA dentro de la atención integral de un paciente con trauma grave, estando aun estas en desarrollo. La utilización en un paciente con trauma grave se encuentra protocolizada en diferentes pasos que van desde el acceso arterial hasta el seguimiento de la extremidad post retiro del introductor. Por este último punto, REBOA se encuentra dentro de los implementos importantes de la reanimación, sin embargo, no reemplaza conceptos básicos como atención integral del paciente politraumatizado, control precoz del sangrado y el control de daños resucitativo. Su implementación requiere de un centro altamente protocolizado y con equipos de trauma establecidos con el objetivo de disminuir las complicaciones y optimizar la supervivencia.

Non compressible torso hemorrhage continues to be one of the main causes of mortality in trauma victims. The control of this type of bleeding requires invasive procedures such as resuscitation thoracotomy, that is performed on the patient "in extremis". The use of REBOA has been reintroduced since 2011, as a form of endovascular occlusion of the aorta and over time it is has already part of the implements that a level I trauma center. REBOA is used within the resuscitation process, while definitive control of bleeding in the torso is carried out, in order to increase the perfusion of organs such as the brain and heart, with two main areas of occlusion at the aortic level. Multiple investigations have been carried out to find the indications and benefits of REBOA within the comprehensive care of a patient with severe trauma, and these are still under development. Its use in a patient with severe trauma is protocolized in different steps that go from arterial access to follow-up of the extremity after removal of the sheath. For this last point, REBOA is among the important implements of resuscitation, however, it does not replace basic concepts such as comprehensive care of the polytraumatized patient, early control of bleeding and resuscitative damage control. Its implementation requires a highly protocolized center with established trauma teams with the aim of reducing complications and optimizing survival.

A dumbbell rescue stent graft facilitates clamp-free repair of aortic injury in a porcine model.

Objective: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage is a high-mortality injury. We previously reported improved outcomes with a retrievable rescue stent graft to temporize aortic hemorrhage in a porcine model while maintaining distal perfusion. A limitation was that the original cylindrical stent graft design prohibited simultaneous vascular repair, given the concern for suture ensnarement of the temporary stent. We hypothesized that a modified, dumbbell-shaped design would preserve distal perfusion and also offer a bloodless plane in the midsection, facilitating repair with the stent graft in place and improve the postrepair hemodynamics. Methods: In an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved terminal porcine model, a custom retrievable dumbbell-shaped rescue stent graft (dRS) was fashioned from laser-cut nitinol and polytetrafluoroethylene covering and compared with aortic cross-clamping. Under anesthesia, the descending thoracic aorta was injured and then repaired with cross-clamping (n = 6) or dRS (n = 6). Angiography was performed in both groups. Operations were divided into phases: (1) baseline, (2) thoracic injury with either cross-clamp or dRS deployed, and (3) recovery, after which the clamp or dRS were removed. Target blood loss was 22% to simulate class II or III hemorrhagic shock. Shed blood was recovered with a Cell Saver and reinfused for resuscitation. Renal artery flow rates were recorded at baseline and during the repair phase and reported as a percentage of cardiac output. Phenylephrine pressor requirements were recorded. Results: In contrast with cross-clamped animals, dRS animals demonstrated both operative hemostasis and preserved flow beyond the dRS angiographically. Recovery phase mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume were significantly higher in dRS animals (P = .033, P = .015, and P = .012, respectively). Whereas distal femoral blood pressures were absent during cross-clamping, among the dRS animals, the carotid and femoral MAPs were not significantly different during the injury phase (P = .504). Cross-clamped animals demonstrated nearly absent renal artery flow, in contrast with dRS animals, which exhibited preserved perfusion (P<.0001). Femoral oxygen levels (partial pressure of oxygen) among a subset of animals further confirmed greater distal oxygenation during dRS deployment compared with cross-clamping (P = .006). After aortic repair and clamp or stent removal, cross-clamped animals demonstrated more significant hypotension, as demonstrated by increased pressor requirements over stented animals (P = .035). Conclusions: Compared with aortic cross-clamping, the dRS model demonstrated superior distal perfusion, while also facilitating simultaneous hemorrhage control and aortic repair. This study demonstrates a promising alternative to aortic cross-clamping to decrease distal ischemia and avoid the unfavorable hemodynamics that accompany clamp reperfusion. Future studies will assess differences in ischemic injury and physiological outcomes. Clinical Relevance: Noncompressible aortic hemorrhage remains a high-mortality injury, and current damage control options are limited by ischemic complications. We have previously reported a retrievable stent graft to allow rapid hemorrhage control, preserved distal perfusion, and removal at the primary repair. The prior cylindrical stent graft was limited by the inability to suture the aorta over the stent graft owing to risk of ensnarement. This large animal study explored a dumbbell retrievable stent with a bloodless plane to allow suture placement with the stent in place. This approach improved distal perfusion and hemodynamics over clamp repair and heralds the potential for aortic repair while avoiding complications.

Short Peptide Nanofiber Biomaterials Ameliorate Local Hemostatic Capacity of Surgical Materials and Intraoperative Hemostatic Applications in Clinics.

Short designer self-assembling peptide (dSAP) biomaterials are a new addition to the hemostat group. It may provide a diverse and robust toolbox for surgeons to integrate wound microenvironment with much safer and stronger hemostatic capacity than conventional materials and hemostatic agents. Especially in noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH), diffuse mucosal surface bleeding, and internal medical bleeding (IMB), with respect to the optimal hemostatic formulation, dSAP biomaterials are the ingenious nanofiber alternatives to make bioactive neural scaffold, nasal packing, large mucosal surface coverage in gastrointestinal surgery (esophagus, gastric lesion, duodenum, and lower digestive tract), epicardiac cell-delivery carrier, transparent matrix barrier, and so on. Herein, in multiple surgical specialties, dSAP-biomaterial-based nano-hemostats achieve safe, effective, and immediate hemostasis, facile wound healing, and potentially reduce the risks in delayed bleeding, rebleeding, post-operative bleeding, or related complications. The biosafety in vivo, bleeding indications, tissue-sealing quality, surgical feasibility, and local usability are addressed comprehensively and sequentially and pursued to develop useful surgical techniques with better hemostatic performance. Here, the state of the art and all-round advancements of nano-hemostatic approaches in surgery are provided. Relevant critical insights will inspire exciting investigations on peptide nanotechnology, next-generation biomaterials, and better promising prospects in clinics.

Mechanistic considerations for adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium (ALM) in controlling coagulopathy.

Adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium (ALM) mixture is a cardioplegic agent that improves survivability undisputedly in rodents, but not swine, models of hemorrhagic shock. However, despite protection from comorbid coagulopathy being the one common effect reported in both models, the underlying prothrombotic mechanism for ALM has not been fully elucidated. Here, we undertook a component-based approach focusing on individual drugs in the mixture to elaborate on the protective mechanism against coagulopathy within the frames of adenosine signaling and metabolic pathways. Additionally, the translational potential of small and large animal models of hemorrhagic shock for human survival is critically appraised, owing to substantial quantitative/qualitative differences between humans and rodents, particularly regarding the genetics of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) interacting with ALM's constituents.

Do we need pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the civilian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS)?

Pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can be a life-saving procedure for patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage. We aimed to evaluate the potential eligibility for REBOA in trauma patients of a civilian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) using a stepwise approach. A retrospective analysis using the electronic database (HEMSDER) of "DRF Luftrettung" HEMS covering the period from January 2015 to June 2021 was performed. Trauma patients aged ≥ 16 years and with a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score of ≥ 4 were assessed for potential REBOA eligibility using two different decision trees based on assumed severe bleeding due to injuries of the abdomen, pelvis, and/or lower extremities and different vital signs on the scene and at hospital handover. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for comparison. A total of 22.426 patients met the inclusion criteria for data analysis. Of these, 0.15-2.24% were possible candidates for pre-hospital REBOA. No significant differences between groups on scene and at hospital handover regarding demographics, assumed injuries, and pre-hospital interventions were found. In the on-scene group, 21.1% of the patients remained unstable even at hospital handover despite pre-hospital care. In the handover group, 42.8% of the patients seemed initially stable but then deteriorated during the pre-hospital course. The number of potential pre-hospital REBOA in severely injured patients with a NACA score of ≥ 4 is < 3% or can be even < 1% if more strict criteria are used. There are some patients who may benefit from pre-hospital REBOA as a life-saving procedure. Further research on earlier diagnosis of life-threatening bleeding and proper indications of REBOA in trauma patients is needed.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Traumatic Cardiopulmonary Arrest in the Emergency Department: The First Case With Successful Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Taiwan.

Exsanguinating torso hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in trauma patients. Bleeding leads to hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy, the so-called "lethal triad," and creates a vicious cycle. Therefore, bleeding control tops the priority list in the management of trauma patients. Placement of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with traumatic non-compressible torso hemorrhage is a developing technique in the emergency departments (EDs) in Taiwan, and it is a possible solution for abdominal and pelvic trauma patients with hemodynamic instability. It not only temporarily controls bleeding below the inflation site but also increases cerebral and coronary circulation. It can create a bridge for definitive care such as an operation or an embolization, possibly preventing death. Compared to thoracotomy followed by an aortic cross clamp, REBOA is a less invasive and possibly, a more efficient way to control the hemorrhage and may lead to better overall survival. The use of REBOA has been proven to be associated with improved survival-to-discharge in severely injured trauma patients. We report a case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by penetrating injury wherein return of spontaneous circulation was successfully achieved after 39-minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation and REBOA placement in the ED. The REBOA balloon was deflated after bleeding was stopped during the laparotomy operation. The patient was then transferred to the intensive care unit for postoperative care. Unfortunately, the patient passed away approximately 12 hours after the surgery.

A review of treatments for non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) and internal bleeding.

Non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is associated with significant mortality in preventable deaths, both in the field and in civilian settings. Current management strategies of these injuries include fluid resuscitation, the use of foaming materials to occlude damaged vessels, and fibrin sealants. Researchers in the field have proposed multiple alternatives to these treatments, such as hemostatic sponges, self-assembling peptide materials, in situ crosslinking hydrogels, and intravenous nanoparticles, which are then challenged in a wide variety of injury models to evaluate their efficacy. This review first discusses the treatment of NCTH in the clinic and field before providing an overview of materials in literature designed for this same purpose, with the intention of summarizing the treatment options and research currently available in this field. The mechanisms of these hemostats, as well as their effectiveness in promoting hemostasis (evaluated through survival, bleeding time, and blood loss volume) are summarized side-by-side for easy comparison across various studies and animal models. Ultimately, a better understanding of existing technologies and the metrics through which they are evaluated may facilitate the development of safer, more effective therapies for non-compressible torso hemorrhage and internal bleeding.

Impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in traumatic abdominal and pelvic exsanguination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) represents a minimally invasive technique of aortic occlusion (AO). It has been demonstrated to be safe and effective with appropriate training in traumatic hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability; however, its indications are still debated. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the impact of REBOA on mortality in torso trauma patient with severe non-compressible hemorrhage compared to other temporizing hemostatic techniques. STUDY DESIGN: The primary outcome is represented by 24-h, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are post-procedural hemodynamic improvement (systolic blood pressure-SBP), mean injury severity score (ISS) differences, treatment-related morbidity, transfusional requirements and identification of prognostic factors. RESULTS: A significant survival benefit at 24 h (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.79; I2: 55%; p = 0.005) was highlighted in patients undergoing REBOA. Regarding in-hospital mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.75-1.32; I2: 73%; p = 0.98) no differences in risk of death were noticed. A hemodynamic improvement-although not significant-was highlighted, with 55.8 mmHg post-AO SBP mean difference between REBOA and control groups. A significantly lower mean number of packed Red Blood Cells (pRBCs) was noticed for REBOA patients (mean difference: - 3.02; 95% CI - 5.79 to - 0.25; p = 0.033). Nevertheless, an increased risk of post-procedural complications (RR 1.66; 95% CI 0.39-7.14; p = 0.496) was noticed in the REBOA group. CONCLUSIONS: REBOA may represent a valid tool in the initial treatment of multiple sites subdiaphragmatic hemorrhage with refractory hemodynamic instability. However, due to several important limitations of the present study, our findings should be interpreted with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III according to ELIS (SR/MA with up to two negative criteria).

Use of REBOA in the universe of magical realism: a real-world review / Uso de REBOA en el universo del realismo mágico: revisión de vida real

Abstract While reading the novella "Chronicle of a Death Foretold" by the Colombian Nobel Laureate Gabriel García-Marquez, we were surprised to realize that the injuries sustained by the main character could have been successfully treated had he received modern trauma care in which REBOA may have been considered. This is a discussion of Mr. Nasar's murder to explore whether he could have been saved by deploying REBOA as a surgical adjunct to bleeding control and resuscitation. In reading García-Marquez's novel we noted the events that unfolded at the time of Santiago Nasar's murder. To contextualize the claim that Mr. Nasar could have survived, had his injuries been treated with REBOA, we explored and illustrated what could have done differently and why. On the day of his death, Mr. Nasar sustained multiple penetrating stab wounds. Although he received multiple stab wounds to his torso, the book describes seven potentially fatal injuries, resulting in hollow viscus, solid viscus, and major vascular injuries. We provided a practical description of the clinical and surgical management algorithm we would have followed in Mr. Nasar's case. This algorithm included the REBOA deployment for hemorrhage control and resuscitation. The use of REBOA as part of the surgical procedures performed could have saved Mr. Nasar's life. Based on our current knowledge about REBOA in trauma surgery, we claim that its use, coupled with appropriate surgical care for hemorrhage control, could have saved Santiago Nasar's life, and thus prevent a death foretold.

Resumen Leyendo la novela "Crónica de una muerte anunciada" del Nobel de Literatura Gabriel García Márquez, nos sorprendió reconocer que las heridas provocadas al personaje principal se habrían podido tratar exitosamente en un centro de trauma moderno donde hubieran optado por REBOA. Hacemos referencia al asesinato del señor Nasar para explorar la posibilidad de que se hubiera podido salvar de haberse utilizado REBOA como adyuvante de la cirugía para reanimación y control de la hemorragia. En la lectura de la novela de García Márquez tomamos nota de los sucesos que tuvieron lugar en el momento del asesinato de Santiago Nasar. Para contextualizar la afirmación de que Nasar habría podido sobrevivir si le hubieran manejado sus heridas con REBOA, exploramos e ilustramos lo que habría podido hacerse de otra manera y porqué. El día en que murió, el señor Nasar sufrió múltiples heridas por arma blanca y si bien muchas de ellas fueron en el torso, el libro describe siete heridas mortales que comprometieron los órganos sólidos, además de lesiones vasculares mayores. Presentamos una descripción práctica del algoritmo para el manejo clínico y quirúrgico que habríamos seguido en el caso del señor Nasar. Este algoritmo incluye el uso de REBOA para el control de la hemorragia y la reanimación, el cual, como parte de los procedimientos quirúrgicos realizados, habría podido salvarle la vida a la víctima. Basados en nuestro conocimiento actual acerca del uso de REBOA en la cirugía de trauma, planteamos que, junto con la atención quirúrgica apropiada para controlar la hemorragia, este procedimiento habría podido salvarle la vida a Santiago Nasar y, por tanto, evitar una muerte anunciada.

A feasibility study of partial REBOA data in a high-volume trauma center.

PURPOSE: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporize patients with infradiaphragmatic hemorrhage. Current guidelines advise < 30 min, to avoid ischemia/ reperfusion injury, whenever possible. The technique of partial REBOA (P-REBOA) has been developed to minimize the effects of distal ischemia. This study presents our clinical experience with P-REBOA, comparing outcomes to complete occlusion (C-REBOA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' electronic data and local REBOA registry between January 2016 and May 2019. INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult trauma patients who received Zone I C-REBOA or P-REBOA for infradiaphragmatic hemorrhage, who underwent attempted exploration in the operating room. Comparison of outcomes based on REBOA technique (P-REBOA vs C-REBOA) and occlusion time (> 30 min, vs ≤ 30 min) RESULTS: 46 patients were included, with 14 treated with P-REBOA. There were no demographic differences between P-REBOA and C-REBOA. Prolonged (> 30 min) REBOA (regardless of type of occlusion) was associated with increased mortality (32% vs 0%, p = 0.044) and organ failure. When comparing prolonged P-REBOA with C-REBOA, there was a trend toward lower ventilator days [19 (11) vs 6 (9); p = 0.483] and dialysis (36.4% vs 16.7%; p = 0.228) with significantly less vasopressor requirement (72.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: P-REBOA can be delivered in a clinical setting, but is not currently associated with improved survival in prolonged occlusion. In survivors, there is a trend toward lower organ support needs, suggesting that the technique might help to mitigate ischemic organ injury. More clinical data are needed to clarify the benefit of partial occlusion REBOA.

Red Alert: It Is Time to Strengthen the Medical Knowledge of Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage Among Health-Care Workers.

OBJECTIVE: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is a major challenge in prehospital bleeding control and is associated with high mortality. This study was performed to estimate medical knowledge and the perceived barriers to information acquisition among health-care workers (HCWs) regarding NCTH in China. METHODS: A self-administered and validated questionnaire was distributed among 11 WeChat groups consisting of HCWs engaged in trauma, emergency, and disaster rescue. RESULTS: A total of 575 HCWs participated in this study. In the knowledge section, the majority (87.1%) denied that successful hemostasis could be obtained by external compression. Regarding attitudes, the vast majority of HCWs exhibited positive attitudes toward the important role of NCTH in reducing prehospital preventable death (90.4%) and enthusiasm for continuous learning (99.7%). For practice, fewer than half of HCWs (45.7%) had heard of NCTH beforehand, only a minority (14.3%) confirmed they had attended relevant continuing education, and 16.3% HCWs had no access to updated medical information. The most predominant barrier to information acquisition was the lack of continuing training (79.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge and practice deficiencies do exist among HCWs. Obstacles to update medical information warrant further attention. Furthermore, education program redesign is also needed.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta Versus Aortic Cross-Clamping by Thoracotomy for Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta (REBOA) in lowering mortality rate compared to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is inconclusive. In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we determined the effectiveness of the two techniques in patients with noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online databases (PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE) were searched until April 23, 2021, for original articles investigating the effect of REBOA on relevant outcomes (e.g., mortality in ED, mortality before discharge, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and length of ICU stay) among NCTH patients in contrast to open aortic occlusion by RT. Data on baseline characteristics and endpoints were extracted. Review Manager version 5.4.1 and OpenMetaAnalyst were used for analyses. Risk ratios (RR) and the weighted mean differences (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Eight studies were included having 3241 patients in total (REBOA: 1179 and RT: 2062). The pooled analysis demonstrated that compared to RT, mortality was significantly lower in the REBOA group in all settings: In emergency department (ED) (RR 0.63 [0.45, 0.87], P = 0.006, I2 = 81%), before discharge (RR= 0.86 [0.75, 0.98], P = 0.03, I2 = 93%), and in-hospital mortality (RR 0.80 [0.68, 0.95], P = 0.009, I2 = 85%). Similarly, the length of ICU stay was significantly lower in REBOA group (WMD = 0.50 [-0.48, 1.48], P = 0.32, I2 =97%). However, no significant differences were observed in the length of hospital stay (WMD = 0.0 [-0.26, 0.26] P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled analysis shows REBOA to be effective in reducing mortality among NCTH patients. However, due to limited studies, the positive findings should be viewed discreetly and call for further investigation.

A Life Saving Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) with Open Groin Technique.

A 53-year-old male pedestrian was hit by a car and arrived at our hospital with a blunt abdominal injury and hemorrhagic shock. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) was performed in a timely fashion using the open groin technique in the emergency room. The procedure resulted in rapid improvement of hemodynamic status while the bleeding source was controlled. Recently, REBOA is a proper adjunctive procedure in major non-compressible torso hemorrhage patients. The procedure requires a portable X-ray or fluoroscopic machine in the ER to confirm the balloon's position. This method has likely limited the use of REBOA in developing countries. The procedure with open groin technique, using anatomical landmarks and physiologic change to confirm the position of the balloon, has been developed to address these concerns. Here we report on the treatment's success with this technique and believe that it can benefit trauma patient care.

State-of-the-art methods for the treatment of severe hemorrhagic trauma: selective aortic arch perfusion and emergency preservation and resuscitation-what is next?

Trauma is a primary cause of death globally, with non-compressible torso hemorrhage constituting an important part of "potentially survivable trauma death." Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta has become a popular alternative to aortic cross-clamping under emergent thoracotomy for non-compressible torso hemorrhage in recent years, however, it alone does not improve the survival rate of patients with severe shock or traumatic cardiac arrest from non-compressible torso hemorrhage. Development of novel advanced maneuvers is essential to improve these patients' survival, and research on promising methods such as selective aortic arch perfusion and emergency preservation and resuscitation is ongoing. This review aimed to provide physicians in charge of severe trauma cases with a broad understanding of these novel therapeutic approaches to manage patients with severe hemorrhagic trauma, which may allow them to develop lifesaving strategies for exsanguinating trauma patients. Although there are still hurdles to overcome before their clinical application, promising research on these novel strategies is in progress, and ongoing development of synthetic red blood cells and techniques that reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury may further maximize their effects. Both continuous proof-of-concept studies and translational clinical evaluations are necessary to clinically apply these hemostasis approaches to trauma patients.

Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage: An update.

With the widespread adoption of advanced tourniquets, the mortality rate of limb wound hemorrhage has decreased significantly, and non-compressible torso hemorrhage has gradually occupied the leading position of potentially preventable death, both in military and civilian circumstances. With the emergence of novel hemostatic devices and materials, strategies for the management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage have changed significantly. This review summarizes the current treatment strategies and types of equipment for non-compressible torso hemorrhage and suggests future research directions, hoping to provide a comprehensive review for the medical personnel and researchers engaging in this field.