[Standard radiographic images in cephalomedullary nailing fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fractures].

Objective: To review and summarize the projections of radiographic images during cephalomedullary nailing fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fractures, and to propose a set of three projections as standard requirement in immediate postoperative fluoroscopy. Methods: Papers on intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary nailing fixation that published in a three-year period of 2021-2023 in four leading English orthopedic trauma journals were searched in PubMed. The presented radiographic pictures were identified and scrutinized as whether they were in standard anteroposterior and/or lateral projections of the implanted nails. The nonstandard presence percentage was calculated. Combined with clinical experience, the standard anteroposterior and lateral perspective images of femoral neck, the current situation of radiographic imaging in the operation of cephalomedullary nails, the literature analysis of nonstandard images, the impact of limb rotation on image interpretation, and the characteristics of anteromedial 30° oblique perspective were summarized and analyzed. Results: The presence of nonstandard radiographic pictures is 32.1% in anteroposterior view and 69.2% in lateral view in leading orthopedic trauma journals. In cephalomedullary nailing fixation operation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures, it is reasonable to use the radiographic images of the implanted nails to represent the fractured head-neck, as the head-neck implant (lag screw or helical blade) is aimed to put into centrally in femoral head in lateral projection. Limb rotation or nonstandard projections produced distortion of images, which interfers the surgeons' judgement of fracture reduction quality and the measurement of implant position parameters in femoral head (such as neck-shaft angle and tip-apex distance), and finally lead to a meaningless comparison with the accurate normal value. The 30° anteromedial oblique view from the true lateral (set as 0°) is a tangential projection of the cortices at the anteromedial inferior corner, which gives a clear profile for the determination of cortical apposition status and mechanical support. It is essential to get firstly the true standard lateral fluoroscopy of the nail (shown as a line), then rotate the C-arm to 90° and 30° to get anteroposterior and anteromedial oblique views, and use these three immediate postoperative radiographies as the baseline for evaluation of operative quality and follow-up comparisons. Conclusion: As for real-time monitoring of surgical steps, intraoperative fluoroscopy follows the "Enough is Good" principle, but as for immediate postoperative data storage and basis for operative quality evaluation and baseline for follow-up comparison, it is recommended to obtain a set of three standard radiographic pictures in anteroposterior, true lateral, and 30° anteromedial oblique fluoroscopic projections.

Comparison of Twin Screw Derotation Type Versus Single Helical Blade Type Cephalomedullary Nail in the Management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The intertrochanteric fracture is a frequently occurring fracture, often attributed to osteoporosis in older populations. Recently, there has been a proposal to perform early surgical fixation on elderly patients to facilitate early rehabilitation. This approach has been shown to have a beneficial effect in lowering comorbidities. The study aims to compare the efficacy of the twin screw derotation type cephalomedullary nail with that of the single helical blade type cephalomedullary nail in the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. METHODOLOGY:  The research sample included patients from the orthopedic outpatient and emergency departments of Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Ambala Cantt, India, who were scheduled for surgery for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the kind of implant they were given: either a twin screw derotation cephalomedullary nail or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail. The functional result was evaluated by comparing the modified Harris hip score (HHS). Patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, including reverse oblique fractures and fractures with posteromedial comminution, as well as patients who provided consent, were included in this study. RESULTS:  Thirteen individuals received treatment with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA2), whereas 19 individuals received treatment with proximal femoral nail (PFN). The mean age in the PFNA2 group was 69.51, whereas the mean age in the PFN group was 70.804. There were three patients in the PFNA2 group and five patients in the PFN group who had a tip apex distance of more than 25 mm. According to the Cleveland index, nine patients in the PFNA2 group and eight patients in the PFN group had an implant location that was not optimum. Four patients in the PFNA2 group and seven patients in the PFN group had a neck shaft angle difference of more than 10° between their undamaged and operated sides. The mean HHS was 74.55 for the PFNA2 group and 69.88 for the PFN group. The PFNA2 group exhibited four problems, whereas the PFN group had five issues. CONCLUSION:  The study found that both implants offer similar functional outcomes, with adherence to specific radiological parameters optimizing results. While both face similar challenges with osteoporosis, there was no notable distinction between them. Notably, the PFNA2 group showed superior outcomes in perioperative morbidity.

Impact of lateral cortical notching on biomechanical performance in cephalomedullary nailing for unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

PURPOSE: In pertrochanteric femur fractures the risk for fracture healing complications increases with the complexity of the fracture. In addition to dynamization along the lag screw, successful fracture healing may also be facilitated by further dynamization along the shaft axis. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical stability of additional axial notch dynamization compared to the standard treatment in an unstable pertrochanteric femur fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing. METHODS: In 14 human cadaver femora, an unstable pertrochanteric fracture was stabilized with a cephalomedullary nail. Additional axial notch dynamization was enabled in half of the samples and compared against the standard treatment (n = 7). Interfragmentary motion, axial construct stiffness and load to failure were investigated in a stepwise increasing cyclic load protocol. RESULTS: Mean load to failure (1414 ± 234 N vs. 1428 ± 149 N, p = 0.89) and mean cycles to failure (197,129 ± 45,087 vs. 191,708 ± 30,490, p = 0.81) were equivalent for axial notch dynamization and standard treatment, respectively. Initial construct stiffness was comparable for both groups (axial notch dynamization 684 [593-775] N/mm, standard treatment 618 [497-740] N/mm, p = 0.44). In six out of seven specimens the additional axial dynamization facilitated interfragmentary compression, while maintaining its mechanical stability. After initial settling of the constructs, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either subsidence or rotation of the femoral head fragment (p ≤ 0.30). CONCLUSION: Axial notch dynamization provided equivalent mechanical stability compared to standard treatment in an unstable pertrochanteric fracture. Whether the interfragmentary compression generated by axial notch dynamization will promote fracture healing through improved fracture reduction needs to be evaluated clinically.

Factors Associated With Failure of Synthesis in the Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures With Cephalomedullary Nails.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femur fractures are common in older patients and typically require surgical treatment, with cephalomedullary nails being the gold standard device for this approach. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with the failure of cephalomedullary nailing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 380 patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail between August 2021 and August 2022 in a trauma referral center in Brazil. A total of 221 (58.1%) patients were included in the study after applying specific eligibility criteria. Data were collected and rates were determined by reviewing patients' medical records and radiographs. RESULTS: Of 221 patients, 14 (6.3%) had nail failures A significant association was found between post-fixation cervico-diaphyseal angle and the occurrence of nail failure (p<0.001). Furthermore, calcar-referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD) and tip-apex distance (TAD) values were higher in cases with nail failure than in those without nail failure. Cutoff points were established for TAD and CalTAD to measure the correspondence with nail failures. CONCLUSION: The present study supports previous evidence that varus reduction potentially causes collapse and nail failure in pertrochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nailing and that high TAD and CalTAD values contribute to the incidence of cut-out.

Is nail-plate docking worth the effort? A biomechanical analysis of docking a plate and a nail in peri-implant femur fractures.

Purpose: The ideal treatment of peri-implant femur fractures (PIFFs) remains unclear due to the thin clinical and biomechanical evidence concerning the most suitable form of osteosynthesis. The purpose of the present study was thus to determine the biomechanical stability that results from combining a cephalomedullary nail and a plate for proximal PIFFs, especially when the nail-plate docking technique is applied. Methods: Twenty four PIFFs were simulated in both 12 foam and 12 composite specimens and were stabilized via a combination of a cephalomedullary nail and a plate. The control group (n = 6) had a nail and a plate without a connection, while the intervention group (n = 6) had a screw that connected the plate with the interlocking screw hole of the nail, thereby creating a nail-plate docking system. The specimens were evaluated under axial and torsional loading using a material-testing machine and a 3D metrology system. Results: The data regarding stiffness, failure load, and failure displacement showed significantly higher stability for specimens without nail-plate docking. For docked specimens, a non-significant trend toward a higher resistance to torque was observed. Both techniques displayed no significant difference in fracture gap displacement or total displacement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that nail-plate docking of a cephalomedullary nail, and a plate significantly decreases the stiffness and stability of osteosynthesis under axial loading. However, there seems to be a tendency toward higher resistance to torque. Therefore, surgeons should consider this technique if higher torsional stability is necessary, and they should decide against it, if axial stability is preferred.

Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if augmentation of the helical blade with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement decreases the rates of varus cut-out and medial perforation in geriatric intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study at two urban Level I trauma centers. Patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture (classified as AO 31A1-3) who were treated with the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) from 2018 to 2021 were eligible for the study. Medical records and post-operative radiographs were reviewed to determine procedure complications and reoperations. Results: Of the 179 patients studied, cement augmentation (CA) was used in 93 patients (52%) and no cement augmentation (NCA) was used in 86 (48%). There were no significant differences between group demographics and fracture reduction grades. Varus cut-out occurred three times in the CA group and five times in the NCA group (p = 0.48). Medial perforation occurred three times, all in the NCA group (p = 0.11). The most frequent complication was symptomatic blade lateralization from fracture collapse, with eight occurrences in the CA group compared with two in the NCA group (p = 0.10). There were 10 reoperations in the CA group and 9 in the NCA group (p = 0.99). The most common reason for reoperation was varus cut-out and the most common revision procedure was hip arthroplasty. Conclusions: Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFNA fixation system with and without cement augmentation have similar complication profiles and reoperation rates.

What is the Optimal Nail Length to Treat Osteoporotic Subtrochanteric Fractures? A Finite Element Analysis.

Background: Operative management with intramedullary nail fixation remains the definitive treatment of choice for osteoporotic subtrochanteric (ST) fractures; however, there remains no consensus regarding the proper nail length. We aimed to use 3-dimensional finite element (FE) analysis to determine the optimal nail length for the safe fixation of osteoporotic ST fractures. Methods: Nine modes of FE models were constructed using 9 different lengths of cephalomedullary nails (short nails: 170, 180, and 200 mm; long nails: 280, 300, 320, 340, 360, and 380 mm) from the same company. The interfragmentary motion was analyzed. Additionally, the peak von Mises stress (PVMS) in the cortical bone, cancellous bone of the femoral head, and the nail were measured, and the yielding risk for each subject was investigated. Results: Long nails were associated with less interfragmentary motion. In the cortical bone, the PVMS of short nails was observed at the distal locking screw holes of the femoral medial cortex; however, in long nails, the PVMS was observed at the lag screw holes on the lateral cortex. The mean yielding risk of long nails was 40.1% lower than that of short nails. For the cancellous bone of the femoral head, the PVMS in all 9 FE models was in the same area: at the apex of the femoral head. There was no difference in the yielding risk between short and long nails. For implants, the PVMS was at the distal locking screw hole of the nail body in the short nails and the nail body at the fracture level in the long nails. The mean yielding risk was 74.9% lower for long nails than that for short nails. Conclusions: Compared to short nails, long nails with a length of 320 mm or more showed less interfragmentary motion and lower yielding risk in low-level osteoporotic ST fractures. The FE analysis supports long nails as a safer option than short nails, especially for treating transverse-type low-level osteoporotic ST fractures.

Comparative study of a novel proximal femoral bionic nail and three conventional cephalomedullary nails for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: a finite element analysis.

Purpose: Conventional cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly employed for internal fixation in the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric (ROI) fractures. However, the limited effectiveness of conventional CMNs in addressing ROI fractures results in significant implant-related complications. To address challenges associated with internal fixation, a novel Proximal Femoral Bionic Nail (PFBN) has been developed. Methods: In this study, a finite element model was constructed using a normal femoral specimen, and biomechanical verification was conducted using the GOM non-contact optical strain measurement system. Four intramedullary fixation approaches-PFBN, Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation InterTan nail (ITN), and Gamma nail (Gamma nail)-were employed to address three variations of ROI fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3). The biomechanical stability of the implant models was evaluated through the calculation of the von Mises stress contact pressure and displacement. Results: Compared to conventional CMNs, the PFBN group demonstrated a 9.36%-59.32% reduction in the maximum VMS at the implant. The A3.3 ROI fracture (75% bone density) was the most unstable type of fracture. In comparison to conventional CMNs, PFBN demonstrated more stable data, including VMS values (implant: 506.33 MPa, proximal fracture fragment: 34.41 MPa), contact pressure (13.28 MPa), and displacement (17.59 mm). Conclusion: Compared to the PFNA, ITN, and GN, the PFBN exhibits improvements in stress concentration, stress conduction, and overall model stability in ROI fractures. The double triangle structure aligns better with the tissue structure and biomechanical properties of the proximal femur. Consequently, the PFBN has significant potential as a new fixation strategy for the clinical treatment of ROI fractures.

Role of Anteromedial Cortical Support for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Being Treated With Cephalomedullary Nails.

INTRODUCTION: Reduction quality is of paramount importance for an optimal outcome in unstable pertrochanteric fractures. The non-anatomical functional anteromedial buttress is proposed to prevent impending mechanical complications. We aimed to evaluate the role of anteromedial cortical support in preventing mechanical complications following fixation with the cephalomedullary nail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-arm interventional study was conducted in the Orthopaedics Department of a Combined Military Hospital (CMH) in Rawalpindi. The duration of the study was 24 months. Patients were recruited by the purposive sampling technique as per inclusion/exclusion criteria. Preoperatively, the reduction was categorized as per Baumgartner's and Chang's criteria. Post-operatively, weight bearing as tolerated was advised. Radiographs prior to discharge for loss of reduction were evaluated. Follow-up radiographic measurements of neck length, neck shaft angle, and their loss as per protocol were done at three and six months. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were operated on from October 21 until August 23. Mortality at six months in 39 patients (19.3%) and loss to follow-up in 31 patients (15.3%) resulted in 132 patients with complete follow-up and having developed complications in 12 patients (9.09%). The mean age was 76.3 ± 7.98 years; males were 105 (79.5%), and females were 27 (20.5%). Closed reduction was 58 (43.9%), and additional manoeuvres were required in 74 (56.1%). The mean tip apex distance (TAD) was 24.56 ± 2.76, and the Calcar gap was 5.16 ± 1.27. Cleveland zone centre-centre in 54 (40.9%), inferior-centre in 65 (49.2%), and inferior-posterior (9.9%) were statistically significant for mechanical complications (p≤0.001). There was a significant association between the grading of Chang's and Baumgartner's poor groups for the development of mechanical complications (p≤0.001). The mean time to full weight bearing without support was 21 ± 1.22 weeks. The mean Hip Harris score at six months was 69.27 ± 7.68. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that anteromedial cortical support can lead to fewer potential mechanical complications at six months. A higher Chang's grade drives surgeons to engage in additional manoeuvres. Anteromedial cortical support is worth consideration for unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

Retrospective evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures utilizing PFNA and PFNA augmented.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures utilizing the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), with the main focus on complications and reoperations. The secondary aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with and without cement augmentation of the cephalomedullary nails. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with an acute proximal femoral fracture consequently treated with a PFNA between January 2011 and Dezember  2018 were evaluated. Clinical and radiological data were assessed for intra- and postoperative complications, including treatment failure. In addition, intra- and postoperative radiographs were used to determine the position of the implant, and any migration, via Tip-Apex-Distance (TAD) and the caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD). The accuracy of the fracture reduction was rated according to Baumgaertners criteria. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four consecutive patients (mean age 78.8 ± 12.0; 73.1% female) were included. The predominant OTA/AO fracture classification was 31A1 (153 cases, 58.0%). The average duration of surgery was 63.1 ± 28.0 min and showed no significant differences between PFNA and PFNA with augmentation. The implant positioning was rated as good in 222 cases (84.1%). Two hundred sixty-three patients (99.6%) showed evidence of healing within the time frame of three months postoperatively, one case of delayed union healed after secondary dynamization. During the observational period, 18 patients (6.8%) required a total of 23 additional surgeries. Overall, a lower reoperation rate was observed following the use of the augmentation option (2/86 patients (2.3%) vs. 16/178 patients (9.0%), p = 0.04). In particular, there were no cases of cut-out or cut-through among patients who underwent augmentation as part of osteosynthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall reoperation rate after surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures utilizing the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) was 6.8%, with 23 additional surgeries performed in 18 patients. The usage of the PFNA with augmentation showed equally good implant positioning, excellent healing rates and fewer postoperative complications compared to the PFNA implant alone with a similar overall duration of surgery.

Unravelling variations: an examination of entry point selection in proximal femoral cephalomedullary nailing.

BACKGROUND: The exact positioning of the cephalomedullary (CM) nail entry point for managing femoral fractures remains debatable, with significant implications for fracture reduction and postoperative complications. This study aimed to explore the variability in the selection of the entry point among trauma surgeons, hypothesizing potential differences and their association with surgeon experience. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, 16 participants, ranging from residents to senior specialists, partook in a simulation wherein they determined the optimal entry point for the implantation of a proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A; DePuy Synthes) in various femora. The inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated, along with comprehensive descriptive statistical analysis, to assess the variability in entry point selection and the impact of surgeon experience. RESULTS: In this study, the mean distance from the selected entry points to the calculated mean entry point was 3.98 mm, with a smaller distance observed among surgeons with more than 500 implantations (ANOVA, p = 0.050). Intra-surgeon variability for identical femora averaged at 5.14 mm, showing no significant differences across various levels of surgical experience or training. Notably, 13.6% of selected entry points would not allow a proper intramedullary positioning of the implant, thereby rendering anatomical repositioning unfeasible. Among these impossible entry points, a significant skew towards anterior placement was observed (70.6% of the impossible entry points), with a smaller fraction being overly lateral (27.5%) or medial (13.7%). On a patient level, the impossibility rate varied widely from 0 to 35% among the different femora examined, with a significantly higher rate seen in younger patients (mean age 55.02 versus 60.32; t-test for independent samples, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations exist in surgeons' selection of entry points for proximal femoral nailing, underscoring the task's complexity. Experience does not prevent the choice of unfeasible entry points, emphasizing the inadequacy of a universal approach and pointing towards the necessity for a patient-specific strategy for improved outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032465.

No difference in clinical and hospital quality outcomes in treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric Hip fractures (AO/OTA 31.A3) based on Cephalomedullary nail length.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes following reverse obliquity (RO) intertrochanteric hip fractures based on the use of short cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) compared to long CMNs for fixation. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospectively collected hip fracture registry at an urban academic medical center was queried for all AO/OTA 31A3.1-3 reverse obliquity intertrochanteric (RO) fractures. One hundred and seventy patients with age > 55 years old and minimum 6-month follow-up were identified for analysis. Data was collected for patient demographics, injury details, intraoperative radiographic parameters, perioperative physiologic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes including radiographic time to healing, need for reoperation, nonunion, and mortality. Comparative analyses were conducted between cohorts. Additional multivariable binary logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate for factors independently associated with short and long nail usage. RESULTS: The mean age of the entire cohort was 80.91±10.09 years: 103 patients had a long CMN implanted, and 67 patients had a short CMN implanted. There were no demographic differences or differences in radiographic time to healing, rates of mortality, readmission, nonunion, and need for reoperation. Univariable analysis revealed that short CMN had lower intraoperative blood loss (111.19±83.97 mL vs 176.72±161.45 mL, p = 0.002), decreased need for transfusion (37% vs. 55 %, p = 0.022), and shorter procedures (118.67±57.87 min vs. 148.95±77.83 min, p = 0.002. Multivariable analysis revealed that short nail usage was associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss, decreased need for transfusion, and shorter operative times. CONCLUSION: Nail length does not affect healing or hospital quality outcomes in the treatment of RO hip fractures. The use of short CMNs for these fractures did correlate with lower intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and need for blood transfusion, with non-inferior outcomes and similar hospital quality measures when compared to long CMNs.

Bilateral Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures in a Paraplegic Patient: A Case Report.

Bilateral intertrochanteric (IT) femur fractures are rare, and appropriate evaluation and treatment can vary depending on concurrent patient comorbidities. Even less has been described for patients with bilateral IT fractures with pre-existing paraplegia. This case report describes the unique case of a 72-year-old paraplegic female who presented with bilateral IT femur fractures due to a wheelchair accident. The patient was treated with single-stage bilateral cephalomedullary nail fixation so she could effectively transfer to and from the wheelchair with less pain and a greater chance of fracture union. At the last follow-up, the patient's pain had resolved and she was able to transfer as effectively and safely as her pre-injury baseline. Single-stage cephalomedullary fixation of bilateral IT femur fractures is indicated in the paraplegic population to relieve pain and improve effective safe transfers for daily activities.

[Research progress on distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures].

Objective: To summarize the new research progress in distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: Relevant domestic and foreign literature was extensively reviewed to summarize the static/dynamic types of distal interlocking screw holes, biomechanical studies, clinical studies and application principles, effects on toggling in the cavity, and related complications of distal interlocking screws. Results: The mode of the distal interlocking screw holes can be divided into static and dynamic. Distal interlocking screws play the role of anti-rotation, maintaining femur length, resisting compression stress, increasing torque stiffness, resisting varus stress, etc. The number of the screws directly affects the toggling of the main nail in the cavity. At present, regardless of whether long or short nails are used, distal interlocking screws are routinely inserted in clinical practice. However, using distal interlocking screws can significantly increase the duration of anesthesia and operation, increase fluoroscopy exposure time, surgical blood loss, and incision length. There is a trend of trying not to use distal interlocking screws in recent years. No significant difference is found in some studies between the effectiveness of dynamic and static interlocking for AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A1/2 fractures. At present, the selection of the number and mode of distal interlocking screws is still controversial. When inserting distal interlocking screws, orthopedists should endeavor to minimize the occurrence of complications concerning miss shot, vascular injuries, local stress stimulation, and peri-implant fractures. Conclusion: Distal interlocking screws are mainly used to prevent rotation. For stable fractures with intact lateral walls, long cephalomedullary nails can be used without distal interlocking screws. For any type of intertrochanteric fractures, distal interlocking screws are required when using short cephalomedullary nails for fixation. Different interlocking modes, the number of interlocking screws, and the application prospects of absorbable interlocking screws may be future research directions.

Comparative biomechanical analysis of reconstruction and cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of intramedullary nails - reconstruction nails (RCN) and cephalomedullary nails (CMN) - each with different proximal fixations, in a model of an osteoporotic subtrochanteric femoral fracture. This study focused on assessing stiffness and load to failure of RCN and CMN nails to provide insight into their clinical applications in osteoporotic fracture treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten synthetic osteoporotic femoral models were used to generate a comminuted subtrochanteric fracture model. Five femurs were fixed using an RCN, and the remaining five were fixed using a CMN. The constructs were subjected to axial compression to measure their structural stiffness, load to failure, and failure modes. RESULTS: The CMN group demonstrated a slightly higher load to failure (mean, 2250 N) than the RCN group (mean, 2100 N), which was statistically significant (p = 0.008). However, the stiffness in both groups was statistically similar (RCN, 250 N/mm; CMN, 255 N/mm; p = 0.69). Both groups showed a load to failure exceeding 1500 N, a typically exerted load on the femoral head by a 75 kg individual. The failure patterns differed, with CMN failures starting at the nail insertion area and RCN failures starting at the reconstruction screw area. CONCLUSION: The RCN offers stiffness comparable to that of the CMN; although its load to failure is slightly lower than that of the CMN, it still exceeds the physiological tolerance limit. These findings suggest that the RCN is a viable alternative for treating osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures.

Comparison of patient positions without traction table for proximal femoral nailing: Supine, semilithotomy and lateral decubitus positions.

BACKGROUND: Femur intertrochanteric fractures are performed commonly in a supine position with a traction table. There is a challenge in obtaining traction tables, especially in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is still a debate on which position should be preferred if the traction table cannot be obtained. METHODS: A total of 123 patients who were treated for femur intertrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA A1 or A2) using cephalomedullary nail (CN) were retrospectively analyzed. All three positions without traction table (supine:25 patients, semilithotomy:36 patients and lateral decubitus:62 patients) were compared according to preparation time, surgical time, Tip-Apex distance (TAD), zones of lag screw placement, collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), CDA difference (∆ CDA), postoperative posterior sag, medial cortical support and Baumgardner reduction quality criteria. RESULTS: The preparation time was longer in the semilithotomy group, and surgery time was longer in the supine position group. There was no difference according to total time, surgical time, TAD, CDA difference (∆ CDA), postoperative posterior sag, medial cortical support and Baumgardner reduction quality criteria. Target lag screw placement is superior in supine and semilithotomy group than lateral decubitus. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that there was a difference in preparation time, surgery time and optimal lag screw placement in the lateral plane between groups. The surgeon may prefer all three methods according to patient benefit and surgeon familiarity.

Lessons learned from biomechanical studies on cephalomedullary nails for the management of intertrochanteric fractures. A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing socioeconomic need for optimal treatment of hip fractures in combination with the high diversity of available implants has raised numerous biomechanical questions. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of biomechanical research on the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary devices. METHODS: Following the PRISMA-P guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed on 31.12.2022. The databases PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched. Scientific papers published between 01.01.2000 - 31.12.2022 were included when they reported data on implant properties related to the biomechanical stability for intertrochanteric fractures. Data extraction was undertaken using a synthesis approach, gathering data on criteria of implants, sample size, fracture type, bone material, and study results. RESULTS: The initial search identified a total of 1459 research papers, out of which forty-three papers were considered for final analysis. Due to the heterogeneous methods and parameters used in the included studies, meta-analysis was not feasible. A comprehensive assessment of implant characteristics and outcome parameters was conducted through biomechanical analysis. Various factors such as proximal and distal locking, nail diameter and length, fracture model, and bone material were thoroughly evaluated. CONCLUSION: This scoping review highlights the need for standardization in biomechanical studies on intertrochanteric fractures to ensure reliable and comparable results. Strategies such as avoiding varus, maintaining a sufficient tip-apex-distance, cement augmentation, and optimizing lesser trochanteric osteosynthesis enhance construct stability. Synthetic alternatives may offer advantages over cadaveric bone. Further research and meta-analyses are required to establish standardized protocols and enhance reliability.

Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nail: One or two cephalic screws?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of cut-out, cut-in, cut-through, Z-effect, and reverse Z-effect in two cephalomedullary nail (CMN) systems: one with single cephalic screw fixation and the other with dual-screw fixation using a lag screw and an anti-rotation screw. METHODS: A retrospective study from a cohort of patients was conducted between January 2017 and August 2019 in patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with osteosynthesis using CMN. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six patients with intertrochanteric fractures who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The median age was 81 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12]. Seventy-six percent had fractures classified as Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (OTA/AO) 31A2. Twenty-one mechanical complications occurred, 8.7% (17) was cut-out with a single cephalic screw CMN and 2% (4) was Z-effect with a dual-screw CMN non-integrated. The median tip-apex distance (TAD) was 19.4 mm (IQR 10.8) in patients who experienced cut-out and 19 mm (IQR 10) in those who experienced Z-effect. The median time to cut-out occurrence was 39,5 days (IQR 47,5), while the median time to Z-effect was 90 days (IQR 86). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of osteosynthesis failure using CMN is more frequent in patients treated with a single cephalic screw CMN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

Comparison of Outcomes of Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14,547 Patients.

Purpose: Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures (IFF) fixation could be done with short or long Cephalomedullary Nails (CMNs). Nevertheless, despite several studies in the literature, there has been a continued lack of consensus on which design of CMN is better than the other. Hence, the current review aimed to evaluate the evidence about short versus long CMNs for the fixation of IFF. Methodology: PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol for the study was registered to PROSPERO. Four databases, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched. A total of 31 studies with 6 randomized trials (RCTs) and 25 non-randomized studies were included. Demographic data, follow-up period, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted and evaluated from each of the included studies; statistical analysis was done by Review Manager Software version 5.4.1. Results: Fourteen thousand five hundred forty-seven patients were included in this review. Primary Outcomes: Long CMNs showed statistically significant lower rates of ipsilateral shaft femur refracture (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14, 2.24, p = 0.007); however, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups for mortality at 30 days and within 1 year. Secondary Outcomes: Statistically significant shorter duration of surgery (MD-17.83 (95% CI - 22.03, - 13.63, p < 0.05), less intra-operative blood loss (MD - 62.65, 95% CI - 97.13 to - 28.17, p = < 0.05), and lower blood transfusion rates (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62, 0.83, p < 0.05) for short CMNs; no statistically significant difference for the length of hospital stay, implant-related complications, overall complications, re-operation rates, fluoroscopy time, and functional outcome between two groups of CMNs was seen. Conclusion: With shorter operative time, lesser intra-operative blood loss, and lower postoperative transfusion rates for short CMNs, they have certain benefits over longer CMNs. However, more distal shaft femur fractures were seen in the shorter version of nail, which should be considered before offering these nails to a patient; careful and individualized postoperative weight-bearing protocol could minimize the same. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-00915-5.

How to place a cephalomedullary screw when visualization is obscured by the jig in peritrochanteric hip fractures using "peek radiographs."

Lag screw positioning can be difficult to discern intraoperatively on lateral fluoroscopic imaging during intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures in some nailing systems due to the drill guide handle obstructing the view. We have described a method of obtaining non-obstructed lateral-oblique "peek" views that reliably assist in obtaining adequate tip-apex distance (TAD) measurements when using intramedullary fixation for these fractures. The purpose of this study was (1) to describe an intraoperative radiographic technique to obtain non-obscured views for appropriate center-center placement of the lag screw(s) within the femoral head during jig-aided cephalomedullary nailing of peritrochanteric hip fractures and (2) to present a case series detailing the radiographic results using this technique. This clinical series of sixty-five patients with intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric proximal femur fractures stabilized with a cephalomedullary nail had an average TAD of 15.1 ± 3.3mm (range: 9.4mm-26.2mm). This suggests that our technical trick of obtaining "peek" radiographs intraoperatively may aid in a precise lag-screw placement.