Is There Evidence on the Optimal Duration of Aminoglycoside Therapy in ß-Lactam/Aminoglycoside Combination Regimens Used for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in combination regimens is expected to be different from that of monotherapy regimens, and shorter durations could help minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence for the optimal duration of aminoglycosides in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINHAL databases were searched. Covidence software was used for article screening and management. Studies were included if they clearly reported the duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations used against Gram-negative bacteria. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023392709). RESULTS: A total of 45 ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combination courses from 32 articles were evaluated. The duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in combinations regimens ranged from 1 to 14 days, varying with the type of infection treated. In half (51.1%; (23/45) of the combinations, aminoglycosides were administered for a duration ranging from 6 to 9 days. In 26.7% (12/45) of the combinations, the duration of aminoglycoside therapy was ≤ 5 days. In the remaining 22.2% (10/45) of these combinations, the aminoglycosides were administered for a duration of ≥ 10 days. Aminoglycosides were administered for a longer duration of 7-14 days in 12 (75%) of the 16 combination courses that induced toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Long duration of aminoglycoside use is associated with increased risk of toxicity. However, there is a lack of evidence on defining an optimal duration of aminoglycoside therapy in ß-lactam/aminoglycoside combination regimens that ensures clinical efficacy outcomes whilst minimizing toxicity outcomes.

Optimising antibiotic exposure by customising the duration of treatment for respiratory tract infections based on patient needs in primary care.

Primary care antimicrobial stewardship programs have limited success in reducing antibiotic use, prompting the search for new strategies. Convincing general practitioners to resist antibiotic prescription amid uncertainty or patient demands usually poses a significant challenge. Despite common practice, standard durations for common infections lack support from clinical studies. Contrary to common belief, extending antibiotic treatment beyond the resolution of symptoms does not seem to prevent or reduce antimicrobial resistance. Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy has shown to be effective in mitigating the spread of resistance, particularly in cases of pneumonia. Recent hospital randomised trials suggest that ending antibiotic courses by day three for most lower respiratory tract infections is effective and safe. While community studies are scarce, it is likely that these shorter, tailored courses to meet patients' needs would also be effective and safe in primary care. Therefore, primary care studies should investigate the outcomes of advising patients to discontinue antibiotic treatment upon symptom resolution. Implementing patient-centred, customised treatment durations, rather than fixed courses, is crucial for meeting individual patient needs.

urations of antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media and variability in prescribed durations across two large academic health systems.

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) accounts for roughly 25% of antibiotics prescribed to children annually. Despite national guidelines that recommend short (5-7 days) durations of antibiotics for children two years and older with AOM, most receive long (10-day) courses. This study aims to evaluate antibiotic durations prescribed for children aged 2-17 years with uncomplicated AOM across two pediatric academic health systems, and to assess the variability in prescribed durations between and within each system. METHODS: Electronic medical record (EMR) data from 135 care locations at two health systems were retrospectively analyzed. Outpatient encounters for children aged 2-17 years with a diagnosis of AOM from 2019-2022 were included. The primary outcome was the percent of 5-day prescriptions. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of 7-day prescriptions, 10-day prescriptions, prescriptions for non-first line antibiotics, cases associated with treatment failure, AOM recurrence, and adverse drug events. RESULTS: Among 73,198 AOM encounters for children 2 years and older, 61,612 (84%) encounters resulted in an antibiotic prescription. Most prescriptions were for 10 days (45,689; 75%), 20% were for 7 days (12,060), and only 5% were for 5 days (3,144). Treatment failure, AOM recurrence, adverse drug events, hospitalizations, and office, emergency department or urgent care visits for AOM within 30 days after the index visit were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Despite national guidelines that recommend shorter durations for children with uncomplicated AOM, 75% of our cohort received 10-day durations. Shortening durations of therapy for AOM could reduce antibiotic exposure and should be a priority of pediatric antibiotic stewardship programs.

Controversies in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common infectious syndrome in Australia and a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. It drives a significant amount of antimicrobial prescribing in Australia. Accurate assessment and stratification of CAP severity is important. However, adequate evaluation is challenging and controversy remains about the optimal method. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most commonly identified bacterial pathogen causing CAP. As such, oral amoxicillin monotherapy is the mainstay of empirical therapy for low-severity CAP. The need to start empirical therapy for pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella species in low-severity CAP remains controversial; evaluating the causative pathogen on clinical grounds alone is difficult. Oral antibiotics recommended for CAP (e.g. amoxicillin, doxycycline) have excellent bioavailability and may be used instead of intravenous therapy in some hospitalised patients. A duration of 5 days of antibiotic therapy is recommended in clinical practice guidelines for patients with uncomplicated CAP who meet stability criteria at follow-up.

Association Between Antibiotic Duration and Recurrence of Urinary Tract Infection in the Neonatal Critical Care Unit.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection in infants. Current practice guidelines suggest a treatment duration of 7 to 14 days. Suboptimal therapy may increase the risk for recurrent UTIs leading to renal scarring and possibly chronic kidney disease. The primary objective is to evaluate the duration of therapy for UTIs and its association with the incidence of recurrent UTIs in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The secondary objectives are to identify the risk factors and the most common organisms for recurrent UTIs. METHODS: Patients were identified via the diagnosis codes for UTIs and were included if admitted to the NICU and if they received antibiotics prior to hospital discharge. Patients were divided into 2 groups: antibiotic treatment for 7 days or fewer and antibiotic treatment for greater than 7 days. RESULTS: Eighty-six infants were included in the study. Twenty-six patients received antibiotics for 7 days or fewer, and 60 for more than 7 days. In the study, the median birth weight was 977 g and the median gestational age was 27.6 weeks. There was no significant difference in the rate of recurrent UTIs between the 2 groups (p = 0.66). However, in the subgroup analysis, the incidence was higher for patients receiving antibiotic therapy for fewer than 7 days versus 7 days (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in recurrence of UTI between treatment groups (≤7 days versus >7 days), and recurrence was seen in a higher percentage of patients with a urinary tract anomaly.

Neurobrucellosis Presenting with Motor Damage or Hearing Loss, and Use of Steroids are Associated with a Higher Risk of Sequelae or Relapse: A Systematic Review of Individual Participant Data.

BACKGROUND: Neurobrucellosis presents diverse clinical challenges and risks of long-term complications. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the relationship between the duration of antibiotic therapy, clinical factors, and the outcome of neurobrucellosis with a case report combined with a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: We present a case of a 31 years-old man successfully treated at our Institution. We then searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus for articles that encompassed neurobrucellosis cases, duration of treatment, and outcome. The primary outcome was to assess an association between the duration of treatment and the risk of sequelae or relapses. Univariate, multivariate and sensitivity analysis were carried out to define which variables affect​ed​ the clinical outcome. Quality assessment was performed using a dedicated tool. RESULTS: A total of 123 studies were included, totaling 221 patients. Median duration of treatment was 4 months (IQR 3 - 6), 69% patients recovered without sequelae, 27% had sequelae. Additionally, five patients had a relapse, and 4 patients died. Multivariate analysis found that the duration of treatment, age, and the use of ceftriaxone were not associated with a higher risk of sequelae or relapses. A significant association was found for corticosteroids use (OR 0.39, 95% IC 0.16 - 0.96, p = 0.038), motor impairment (OR 0.29, 95% IC 0.14 - 0.62, p = 0.002), and hearing loss (OR 0.037, 95% IC 0.01 - 0.11, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the variability in clinical presentations and treatment approaches for neurobrucellosis. Patients with factors indicating higher sequelae risk require meticulous follow-up.

Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined With Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A Dose-Escalation Study.

BACKGROUND: Normobaric hyperoxia (NBO) has neuroprotective effects in acute ischemic stroke. Thus, we aimed to identify the optimal NBO treatment duration combined with endovascular treatment. METHODS: This is a single-center, randomized controlled, open-label, blinded-end point dose-escalation clinical trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had an indication for endovascular treatment at Tianjin Huanhu Hospital were randomly assigned to 4 groups (1:1 ratio) based on NBO therapy duration: (1) control group (1 L/min oxygen for 4 hours); (2) NBO-2h group (10 L/min for 2 hours); (3) NBO-4h group (10 L/min for 4 hours); and (4) NBO-6h group (10 L/min for 6 hours). The primary outcome was cerebral infarction volume at 72 hours after randomization using an intention-to-treat analysis model. The primary safety outcome was the 90-day mortality rate. RESULTS: Between June 2022 and September 2023, 100 patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: control group (n=25), NBO-2h group (n=25), NBO-4h group (n=25), and NBO-6h group (n=25). The 72-hour cerebral infarct volumes were 39.4±34.3 mL, 30.6±30.1 mL, 19.7±15.4 mL, and 22.6±22.4 mL, respectively (P=0.013). The NBO-4h and NBO-6h groups both showed statistically significant differences (adjusted P values: 0.011 and 0.027, respectively) compared with the control group. Compared with the control group, both the NBO-4h and NBO-6h groups showed significant differences (P<0.05) in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, as well as in the change of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores from baseline to 24 hours. Additionally, there were no significant differences among the 4 groups in terms of 90-day mortality rate, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, early neurological deterioration, or severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of NBO therapy was associated with oxygen administration duration. Among patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular treatment, NBO therapy for 4 and 6 hours was found to be more effective. Larger-scale multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05404373.

"Give Me Five": The Case for 5 Days of Antibiotics as the Default Duration for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections.

Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) account for most antibiotic prescriptions in pediatrics. Although US guidelines continue to recommend ≥10 days antibiotics for common ARTIs, evidence suggests that 5-day courses can be safe and effective. Academic imprinting seems to play a major role in the continued use of prolonged antibiotic durations. In this report, we discuss the evidence supporting short antibiotic courses for group A streptococcal pharyngitis, acute otitis media, and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. We discuss the basis for prolonged antibiotic course recommendations and recent literature investigating shorter courses. Prescribers in the United States should overcome academic imprinting and follow international trends to reduce antibiotic durations for common ARTIs, where 5 days is a safe and efficacious course when antibiotics are prescribed.

Early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with cancer who have low-risk neutropenic sepsis: the EASI-SWITCH RCT.

Background: Neutropenic sepsis is a common complication of systemic anticancer treatment. There is variation in practice in timing of switch to oral antibiotics after commencement of empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy. Objectives: To establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of early switch to oral antibiotics in patients with neutropenic sepsis at low risk of infective complications. Design: A randomised, multicentre, open-label, allocation concealed, non-inferiority trial to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of early oral switch in comparison to standard care. Setting: Nineteen UK oncology centres. Participants: Patients aged 16 years and over receiving systemic anticancer therapy with fever (≥ 38°C), or symptoms and signs of sepsis, and neutropenia (≤ 1.0 × 109/l) within 24 hours of randomisation, with a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer score of ≥ 21 and receiving intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem for < 24 hours were eligible. Patients with acute leukaemia or stem cell transplant were excluded. Intervention: Early switch to oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) and co-amoxiclav (625 mg three times daily) within 12-24 hours of starting intravenous antibiotics to complete 5 days treatment in total. Control was standard care, that is, continuation of intravenous antibiotics for at least 48 hours with ongoing treatment at physician discretion. Main outcome measures: Treatment failure, a composite measure assessed at day 14 based on the following criteria: fever persistence or recurrence within 72 hours of starting intravenous antibiotics; escalation from protocolised antibiotics; critical care support or death. Results: The study was closed early due to under-recruitment with 129 patients recruited; hence, a definitive conclusion regarding non-inferiority cannot be made. Sixty-five patients were randomised to the early switch arm and 64 to the standard care arm with subsequent intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses including 125 (intervention n = 61 and control n = 64) and 113 (intervention n = 53 and control n = 60) patients, respectively. In the intention-to-treat population the treatment failure rates were 14.1% in the control group and 24.6% in the intervention group, difference = 10.5% (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.22). In the per-protocol population the treatment failure rates were 13.3% and 17.7% in control and intervention groups, respectively; difference = 3.7% (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.148). Treatment failure predominantly consisted of persistence or recurrence of fever and/or physician-directed escalation from protocolised antibiotics with no critical care admissions or deaths. The median length of stay was shorter in the intervention group and adverse events reported were similar in both groups. Patients, particularly those with care-giving responsibilities, expressed a preference for early switch. However, differences in health-related quality of life and health resource use were small and not statistically significant. Conclusions: Non-inferiority for early oral switch could not be proven due to trial under-recruitment. The findings suggest this may be an acceptable treatment strategy for some patients who can adhere to such a treatment regimen and would prefer a potentially reduced duration of hospitalisation while accepting increased risk of treatment failure resulting in re-admission. Further research should explore tools for patient stratification for low-risk de-escalation or ambulatory pathways including use of biomarkers and/or point-of-care rapid microbiological testing as an adjunct to clinical decision-making tools. This could include application to shorter-duration antimicrobial therapy in line with other antimicrobial stewardship studies. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN84288963. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/140/05) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 14. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Neutropenic sepsis, or infection with a low white blood cell count, can occur following cancer treatment. Usually patients receive treatment with intravenous antibiotics (antibiotics delivered into a vein) for two or more days. Patients at low risk of complications from their infection may be able to have a shorter period of intravenous antibiotics benefitting both patients and the NHS. The trial compared whether changing from intravenous to oral antibiotics (antibiotics taken by mouth as tablets or liquid) 12­24 hours after starting antibiotic treatment ('early switch') is as effective as usual care. Patients could take part if they had started intravenous antibiotics for low-risk neutropenic sepsis. Patients were randomly allocated to 'early switch' or to usual care. The main outcome measured was treatment failure. Treatment failure happened if fever persisted or recurred despite antibiotics, if patients needed to change antibiotics, if they needed to be re-admitted to hospital or needed to be admitted to intensive care within 14 days or died. We had originally intended that 628 patients would take part, but after review of the design of the study the number needed to take part was revised to 230. We were not able to complete the trial as planned as unfortunately only 129 patients took part. As the trial was smaller than expected we were not able to draw conclusions as to whether 'early switch' is no less effective than usual care. Our findings suggest that 'early switch' might result in a shorter time in hospital initially; however, treatment failure was more likely to occur, meaning some patients had to return to hospital for further antibiotics. There were no differences in side effects and no serious complications from treatment or treatment failure (such as intensive care admission or death) among the 65 patients in the 'early switch' group. Patients were satisfied with 'early switch'. Early switch may be a treatment option for some patients with low-risk neutropenic sepsis who would prefer a shorter duration of hospital admission but accept a risk of needing hospital re-admission.

When to Stop Antibiotics in the Critically Ill?

Over the past century, antibiotic usage has skyrocketed in the treatment of critically ill patients. There have been increasing calls to establish guidelines for appropriate treatment and durations of antibiosis. Antibiotic treatment, even when appropriately tailored to the patient and infection, is not without cost. Short term risks-hepatic/renal dysfunction, intermediate effects-concomitant superinfections, and long-term risks-potentiating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), are all possible consequences of antimicrobial administration. These risks are increased by longer periods of treatment and unnecessarily broad treatment courses. Recently, the literature has focused on multiple strategies to determine the appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy. Further, there is a clinical shift to multi-modal approaches to determine the most suitable timepoint at which to end an antibiotic course. An approach utilising biomarker assays and an inter-disciplinary team of pharmacists, nurses, physicians, and microbiologists appears to be the way forward to develop sound clinical decision-making surrounding antibiotic treatment.

Real-world use and clinical impact of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool in patients with solid tumors treated with immuno-oncology therapy.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tools to monitor symptoms in patients undergoing cancer treatment has shown clinical benefits. Tennessee Oncology (TO) implemented an ePRO platform in 2019, allowing patients to report their health status online. We conducted a real-world, multicenter, observational, non-interventional cohort study to evaluate utilization of this platform in adults with solid tumors who initiated immuno-oncology (IO) therapy as monotherapy or in combination at TO clinics. METHODS: Patients initiating IO therapy prior to platform implementation were included in a historical control (HC) cohort; those initiating treatment after implementation were included in the ePRO cohort, which was further divided into ePRO users (platform enrollment ≤ 45 days from IO initiation) and non-users. Data were extracted from electronic medical records; patients were followed for up to 6 months (no minimum follow up). Outcomes included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, duration of therapy (DoT), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Data were collected for 538 patients in the HC and 1014 in the ePRO cohort; 319 in the ePRO cohort were ePRO users (uptake rate 31%). Baseline age was higher, more patients had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and more received monotherapy (82 vs 52%, respectively) in the HC vs the ePRO cohort. Median follow-up was 181.0 days (range 0.0-182.6) in the HC and 175.0 (0.0-184.0) in the ePRO cohort. Median DoT of index IO regimen was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-NE) in the HC cohort vs not estimable (NE) in the ePRO cohort. Multivariable regression adjusting for baseline differences confirmed lower risk of treatment discontinuation in the ePRO vs HC cohort: hazard ratio (HR) 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97); p < 0.05. The estimated 6-month OS rate was 65.5% in the HC vs 72.4% in the ePRO cohort (p < 0 .01). Within the ePRO cohort, DoT of index IO regimen and OS did not differ between users and non-users. In ePRO users, patient platform use was durable over 6 months. CONCLUSION: Improvements in DoT and OS were seen after ePRO platform implementation. Conclusions are limited by challenges in separating the impact of platform implementation from other changes affecting outcomes.

Clinical profile of Spanish hepatitisC virus-infected treatment-naïve patients with compensated cirrhosis in the CREST study. / Perfil clínico de los pacientes españoles con hepatitisC naïve con cirrosis compensada tratados en el estudio CREST.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: There are still patients with hepatitisC in Spain who have yet to be diagnosed, but their clinical profile is unclear. In 2021, 21.93% of patients diagnosed had cirrhosis and were mostly treatment-naïve. METHODS: This sub-analysis describes the clinical profile of the 60Spanish treatment-naïve patients with compensated cirrhosis who were included in the CREST study. MAJOR RESULTS: Sixty percent of patients were male, median age 56years, and 33% had a history of drug use. Almost three-quarters (71.3%) had more than one comorbidity and 78.3% took concomitant medication. At treatment initiation, median platelet count was 139×103/µL and FibroScan® 17kPa. No virological failure was observed and no patient discontinued treatment due to adverse events. No clinically significant changes were noted during or after treatment in the median platelet, albumin, bilirubin, and transaminase levels. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8weeks in this cohort of treatment-naïve patients with compensated cirrhosis in Spain was safe and effective. This information reinforces the use of this short antiviral regimen even when there is compensated cirrhosis, simplifying the approach to hepatitisC among those patients still to be diagnosed and treated in Spain.

Time-action and patient experience analyses of locally advanced cervical cancer brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although MRI-based image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has resulted in favorable outcomes, it can be logistically complex and time consuming compared to 2D image-based brachytherapy, and both physically and emotionally intensive for patients. This prospective study aims to perform time-action and patient experience analyses during IGABT to guide further improvements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LACC patients treated with IGABT were included for the time-action (56 patients) and patient experience (29 patients) analyses. Times per treatment step were reported on a standardized form. For the patient experience analysis, a baseline health status was established with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the perceived pain, anxiety and duration for each treatment step were assessed with the NRS-11. RESULTS: The median total procedure time from arrival until discharge was 530 (IQR: 480-565) minutes. Treatment planning (delineation, reconstruction, optimization) required the most time and took 175 (IQR: 145-195) minutes. Highest perceived pain was reported during applicator removal and treatment planning, anxiety during applicator removal, and duration during image acquisition and treatment planning. Perceived pain, anxiety and duration were correlated. Higher pre-treatment pain and anxiety scores were associated with higher perceived pain, anxiety and duration. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the complexity, duration and impact on patient experience of the current IGABT workflow. Patient reported pre-treatment pain and anxiety can help identify patients that may benefit from additional support. Research and implementation of measures aiming at shortening the overall procedure duration, which may include logistical, staffing and technological aspects, should be prioritized.

Impact of Opioid Use on Duration of Therapy and Overall Survival for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the effect of opioid use on outcomes in patients receiving ICI either alone or with chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective review of 209 patients with advanced NSCLC who received an ICI at the University of Virginia between 1 February 2015 and 1 January 2020. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the impact of opioid use on duration of therapy (DOT) and overall survival (OS). Patients with no or low opioid use (n = 172) had a median DOT of 12.2 months (95% CI: 6.9-17.4) compared to 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-2.0) for those with high opioid use (n = 37, HR 0.26 95% CI: 0.17-0.40, p < 0.001). Patients with no or low opioid use had a median OS of 22.6 months (95% CI: 14.8-30.4) compared to 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.9) for those with high opioid use (HR 0.26 95% CI: 0.17-0.40 p < 0.001). High opioid use was associated with a shorter DOT and worse OS. This difference remained significant when accounting for possible confounding variables. These data warrant investigation of possible mechanistic interactions between opioids, tumor progression, and ICIs, as well as prospective evaluation of opioid-sparing pain management strategies, where possible.

Is there a prospective association between psychological distress as measured by the CORE-OM and treatment attendance and treatment duration? A follow-up study at a Norwegian Community Mental Health Centre.

BACKGROUND: Feasible and reliable methods for identifying factors associated with treatment duration and treatment attendance in mental health services are needed. This study examined to what degree the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) at the start of treatment is associated with treatment attendance and treatment duration. METHODS: Outpatients (N = 124) at a community mental health centre in Norway completed the 34-item CORE-OM questionnaire addressing the domains of subjective well-being, problems and symptoms, functioning and risk at the start of treatment. The CORE-OM subscales and the 'all' items total scale were used as predictor variables in regression models, with treatment duration, number of consultations attended, treatment attendance (number of therapy sessions attended divided by number of sessions offered) and termination of treatment (planned versus unplanned) as outcome variables. RESULTS: Higher CORE-OM subscale scores and the 'all' scale were associated with longer treatment duration. No association was found between CORE-OM scales and number of therapy sessions, treatment attendance (sessions attended/offered) or whether the patients unexpectedly ended treatment. CONCLUSION: Higher patient-reported psychological distress as measured by the CORE-OM at the start of treatment was prospectively associated with treatment duration but not with treatment attendance or drop-out of treatment. The findings imply that patients with higher initial psychological distress need longer treatment but that treatment attendance may be related to factors other than the severity of distress.

Comparative efficacy and optimal duration of first-line antibiotic regimens for acute otitis media in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 89 randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic use for acute otitis media (AOM) is one of the major sources of antimicrobial resistance. However, the effective minimal antibiotic duration for AOM remains unclear. Moreover, guidelines often recommend broad ranges (5-10 days) of antibiotic use, yet the clinical impact of such a wide window has not been assessed. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from database inception to 6 October 2021. Network meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials that assessed antibiotic treatment for AOM in children (PROSPERO CRD42020196107). RESULTS: For amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, 7-day regimens were noninferior to 10-day regimens in clinical responses [amoxicillin: risk ratio (RR) 0.919 (95% CI 0.820-1.031), amoxicillin-clavulanate: RR 1.108 (0.957-1.282)], except for ≤ 2 years. For the third-generation cephalosporins, 7-day and 10-day regimens had similar clinical responses compared to placebo [7-day: RR 1.420 (1.190-1.694), 10-day: RR 1.238 (1.125-1.362) compared to placebo]. However, 5-day regimens of amoxicillin-clavulanate and third-generation cephalosporins were inferior to 10-day regimens. Compared to amoxicillin, a shorter treatment duration was tolerable with amoxicillin-clavulanate. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that 10 days of antibiotic use may be unnecessarily long, while the treatment duration should be longer than 5 days. Otherwise, 5-day regimens would be sufficient for a modest treatment goal. Our findings revealed that the current wide range of recommended antibiotic durations may have influenced the clinical outcome of AOM, and a narrower antibiotic duration window should be re-established.

Diabetic foot wound ulcers management by vacuum sealing drainage: A meta-analysis.

The meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare diabetic foot wound ulcer management by vacuum sealing drainage. Using dichotomous or contentious random- or fixed-effects models, the outcomes of this meta-analysis were examined, and the odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Twenty-three examinations from 2000 to 2023 were enrolled for the present meta-analysis, including 1928 individuals with diabetic foot ulcers. Vacuum sealing drainage had significantly lower wound healing (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.79-3.08, p < 0.001), lower duration of therapy (MD, -6.19; 95% CI, -10.06 to -2.32, p = 0.002), higher wound size reduction (MD, 4.22; 95% CI, 0.87-7.56, p = 0.01) and lower complication (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.80, p = 0.01) compared with standard therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The examined data revealed that vacuum sealing drainage had significantly lower wound healing, duration of therapy and complication rates, as well as higher wound size reduction, compared with standard therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Yet, attention should be paid to its values since most of the selected examinations had a low sample size.

Shorter versus longer duration of antibiotic treatment in children with bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for the most common bacterial meningitis etiologies in the pediatric population, namely Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis, is not well-established in the literature. Therefore, we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis comparing shorter versus longer antibiotic treatment in children with meningitis. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared shorter (up to 7 days) versus longer (10 days or double the days of the equivalent short course) duration of antibiotic treatment in children with meningitis and reported the outcomes of treatment failure, death, neurologic sequelae, non-neurologic complications, hearing impairment, nosocomial infection, and relapse. Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for statistical analysis and RoB-2 (Cochrane) for risk of bias assessment. Of 684 search results, 6 RCTs were included, with a cohort of 1333 children ages 3 weeks to 15.5 years, of whom 49.51% underwent a short antibiotic course. All RCTs included monotherapy with ceftriaxone, except one, which added vancomycin as well. No differences were found comparing the short and long duration of therapy concerning treatment failure, relapse, mortality, and neurologic complications at discharge and at follow-up.  Conclusion: Because no statistically significant differences were found between groups for the analyzed outcomes, the results of this meta-analysis support shorter therapy. However, generalizing these results to complicated meningitis and infections caused by other pathogens should be made with caution. (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022369843). What is Known: • Current recommendations on the duration of antibiotic therapy for bacterial meningitis are mostly based on clinical practice. • Defining an optimal duration of antibiotic therapy is essential for antimicrobial stewardship achievement, improving patient outcomes, and minimizing adverse effects. What is New: • There are no differences between shorter versus longer antibiotic treatment duration in regard to treatment failure, relapse, mortality, neurologic complications, and hearing impairment at discharge and at follow-up.