RESUMEN
Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a rare disease with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) as the most common cause. We report that hypersplenic hematologic changes in EHPVO might be eliminated by MPN. Through experience with splenectomy for variceal control with EHPVO, we suspected that spleen might mask MPN-induced thrombocytosis, and that MPN might have a significant influence on excessive thrombocytosis after splenectomy. To clarify the influence of MPN and spleen on platelet trends, we conducted a retrospective hospital database analysis, evaluating 8 EHPVO patients with splenectomy (2 males, 6 females; from 17 years to 64 years, mean 38.3 years). Three (37.5%) of 8 were diagnosed as MPN by JAK2V617F mutation. The perioperative serum platelet counts in EHPVO without MPN were 10.5, 35.4, and 36.6 (x104/µL) preoperatively, after 1 week and 3 weeks, respectively. The platelet counts in EHPVO with MPN were 34.2, 86.4, and 137.0 (x104/µL), respectively. Splenectomy and MPN showed positive interaction on platelet increasing with statistical significance. We also examined the spleen volume index (SpVI: splenic volume (cm3) / body surface area (m2) and postoperative platelet elevations ratio (PER: 3-week postoperative platelet counts / preoperative platelet counts). However, both SpVI and PER showed no significant difference with or without MPN. Histological examination revealed splenic congestion in all 8 EHPVO cases, and splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis in 2 of 3 MPN. In EHPVO with MPN, hypersplenism causes feigned normalization of platelet count by masking MPN-induced thrombocytosis; however, splenectomy unveils postoperative thrombocytosis. Spleen in EHPVO with MPN also participates in extramedullary hematopoiesis.
RESUMEN
Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVO) is an uncommon cause of portal hypertension. In the long term, patients may develop portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (PCC). Up to 30%-40% of patients with EHPVO may not have shuntable veins and are often difficult to manage surgically. Interventional treatment including portal vein recanalisation-trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVRecan-TIPS) has been used for patients with EHPVO. However, PV reconstruction-trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVRecon-TIPS) and portal vein stenting are novel techniques for managing such patients with EHPVO with non-shuntable venous anatomy. In contrast to PVRecan-TIPS, PV reconstruction-TIPS (PVRecon-TIPS) is performed through intrahepatic collaterals. Here we present six cases of PCC who presented with recurrent acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and or refractory biliary stricture. They did not have any shuntable veins. PVRecon-TIPS was performed for five patients whilst PV stenting was done in one. Amongst the six patients, one died of sepsis whilst one who developed hyponatremia and hepatic encephalopathy was salvaged with conservative management. Following the procedure, they were started on anti-coagulation. Decompression of cavernoma was documented in all other patients. Biliary changes improved completely in 40% of patients.
RESUMEN
Portal vein stenting is a treatment option for portal hypertension caused by extrahepatic portal vein obstruction or stenosis. However, limited pathways to approach the portal vein are available, hindering re-intervention in the portal vein. Portal vein puncture through the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt route is less invasive and considered suitable for portal vein stenting. Furthermore, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting facilitates repeat approaches to the portal vein. However, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent is not recommended unless necessary because of adverse events, and cannot be retrieved, once placed. Herein, we report on a novel approach using the repeatable microcatheter access port: ReMAP™ (Toray, Tokyo, Japan), a central vein port into which a 2.9 Fr catheter can be inserted. We used it for a repeat approach to the portal vein with only one puncture and without placing a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: More than 20% of patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) may be deemed as nonshuntable due to lack of a suitable vein. The role of "makeshift shunts" or "lesser shunts" assumes importance in such cases. In this report, the authors have shared their experience with the makeshift shunts in the management of portal hypertension in children with emphasis upon anatomic considerations, resolution of symptoms, outcomes after surgery, and shunt patency. Materials and Methods: During the period 1983-2018, 138 children with portal hypertension were managed under the care of a single surgeon (VB). Of them, 134 were EHPVO. Children with EHPVO were treated with splenectomy and proximal lienorenal shunt (n = 107), splenectomy and devascularization (n = 21), and makeshift shunts (n = 6). Makeshift shunts comprised (i) side-to-side right gastroepiploic vein (Rt-GEV) to left renal vein (LRV) shunt (n = 1), (ii) superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to inferior vena cava (IVC) shunt using a spiral saphenous venous graft (n = 1), (iii) side-to-side inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) to LRV shunt (n = 2), (iv) side-to-side IMV to IVC shunt (n = 1), (v) end-to-side IMV to IVC shunt (n = 1), and (vi) side-to-side IMV to LRV shunt (n = 1) in a case of crossed fused renal ectopia. Results: Following the creation of portosystemic shunt, a decline in portal pressure was demonstrated in all six patients. There was resolution of symptoms including hematemesis, melena, and anorectal variceal bleed. None of the patients demonstrated the features of hepatic encephalopathy. The associated portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (n = 1) also resolved following Rt-GEV to LRV shunt. Shunt patency was documented for the entire duration of follow-up (1.5-4 years) in five of six patients; the sixth patient demonstrated shunt block at 6-month follow-up but without recurrence of symptoms. Conclusions: Makeshift shunts offer a viable alternative to standard portosystemic shunting in pediatric patients with a nonshuntable vein. The selection of such shunts is, however, subject to surgeon's preferences and has to be individualized to local anatomy.
RESUMEN
Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a well-recognized clinico-pathological entity, which is associated with clinical signs and symptoms, imaging, and endoscopic features of portal hypertension (PHT), in absence of cirrhosis. In patients with NCPH without known risk factors of PHT or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, the condition is called idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). There are multiple infectious, immune related causes, systemic diseases, drug and toxin exposures, haematological disorders, and metabolic risk factors that have been associated with this INCPH. However, the causal pathogenesis is still unclear. The Vascular liver disorders interest group group recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) as a syndromic entity, which provides definite histopathological criteria for diagnosis of NCPH (table 1). The three classical histo-morphological lesions specific for PSVD include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal fibrosis. The PSVD definition includes patients with portal vein thrombosis, PVT, and even those without PHT, thus broadening the scope of diagnosis to include patients who may have presented early, prior to haemodynamic changes consistent with PHT. However, this new diagnosis has pros and cons. The cons include mandating invasive liver biopsy to assess the PSVD histological triad in all patients with NCPH, an erstwhile clinical diagnosis in Asian patients. In addition, the natural history of the subclinical forms of PSVD without PHT and linear progression to develop PHT is unknown yet. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD, fallacies and strengths of the old and new schema, pathobiology of this disease, and clinical correlates in an Asian context. Although formulation of standardised diagnostic criteria is useful for comparison of clinical cohorts with INCPH/PSVD, prospective clinical validation in global cohorts is necessary to avoid misclassification of vascular disorders of the liver.
RESUMEN
This report describes the understudied co-occurrence of temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO), exploring a shared pathway involving hypercoagulability. TMJA is an acquired pathology where joint surfaces fuse, causing restricted mouth opening and facial asymmetry. Globally, TMJA is prevalent among 1.5 to 5 patients/million, with a higher incidence in developing countries. While trauma and infections often cause TMJA, the pathogenesis remains unclear in many cases. Recent literature notes a link between TMJA and EHPVO, a noncirrhotic vascular disorder causing portal hypertension and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children. Prothrombotic disorders such as protein C and S deficiency may contribute to EHPVO, mirroring TMJA's association with hypercoagulability. This report focuses on an 11-year-old female diagnosed with TMJA, accompanied by a history of ear infection and concurrent EHPVO. We further presented clinical observations, surgical interventions, and outcomes alongside a literature review to understand the probable connection between EHPVO and TMJA.
RESUMEN
Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a rare disease. Most EHPVO patients are usually referred to a gastroenterologist for intestinal bleeding and hypersplenic thrombocytopenia; however, hypercoagulative diseases may be occult in these patients and require anticoagulation. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the clinical characteristics of EHPVO. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the hospital database, evaluating the medical records of 15 patients (7 males, 8 females, mean age of onset 42.0 years, range 5-74 years). Thirteen of 15 EHPVO patients (86.7%) had intestinal varices. These included 10 esophageal (66.7%), 12 gastric (80.0%), and 6 ectopic varices (40.0%). Nine (60.0%) of 15 had a history of intestinal bleeding. Regarding comorbidities, 5 of 15 (33.3%) suffered from vascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and mesenteric vein thrombosis. The former 3 vascular commodities manifested at less than 32 years of age. Four patients (26.7%) with JAK2V617F mutation were diagnosed as myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). 72.3% of EHPVO patients without MPN experienced thrombocytopenic state. No EHPVO patients with MPN experienced thrombo-leukocytopenia. The elevation of white blood cell and platelet counts, and decrease of protein S were seen in EHPVO with MPN, compared with EHPVO without MPN. EHPVO is frequently associated with underlying hypercoagulative factors, causing a dilemma between thrombotic complications and portal hypertensive bleeding. Most EHPVO patients experience an evident thrombocytopenic state due to severe hypersplenism; however, hypersplenic hematologic changes are eliminated in EHPVO with MPN. MPN should be suspected in EHPVO patients negative for thrombo-leukocytopenia.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Extrahepatic Portal Vein Obstruction is the most common cause of portal hypertension in children. However, it has a very low prevalence. Esophageal varices due to portal hypertension in children can lead to recurrent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which can have a sinister outcome if timely diagnosis and treatment are not initiated. CASE PRESENTATION: A 7-year-old male child presents with recurrent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding for 3 years. Clinical examination reveals pallor and splenomegaly. Laboratory investigations revealed signs of hypersplenism with anemia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia, and Doppler ultrasonography and CT abdomen and pelvis revealed splenic vein thrombosis with splenomegaly and cavernous transformation of the portal vein. The patient was managed operatively with splenectomy with splenorenal shunting and devascularization of esophagogastric varices. DISCUSSION: Extrahepatic Portal Vein obstruction is the most common cause of noncirrhotic portal hypertension in children. Its occurrence in the pediatric population is very rare. Portal hypertension can lead to variceal bleeding and splenomegaly, which can have a significant impact on a child's long-term health. Because of its insidious nature, a meticulous workup is required for its diagnosis, and treatment in the pediatric population is difficult, and appropriate guidelines for its management specifically targeting the pediatric population are lacking. CONCLUSION: Extrahepatic Portal Vein obstruction is rare in children with a difficult diagnosis and management. Despite these hindrances, timely intervention can lift a significant burden of its detrimental outcome off the young children and drastically uplift the quality of life of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hepatopatías , Enfermedades Vasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Vena PortaRESUMEN
Background: Concerned studies with respect to the outcome of pregnant patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension are limited. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature was conducted. Methods: A literature search was conducted from 1999 to December 2021 for studies evaluating pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Results: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of variceal bleeding, ascites and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion were 9.6%, 2.3%, and 14.9%, respectively. The pooled rate of spontaneous miscarriage, gestational hypertension, delivery by cesarean section, and postpartum hemorrhage were 11.9%, 4.5%, 36.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The pooled stillbirth rate was 2.5% and among the live births, the pooled rates of preterm birth, low birth weight, intensive care unit admission, and neonatal mortality were 21.6%, 18.7%, 15.5%, and 1.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Pregnancy in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is associated with increased maternal & fetal morbidity but mortality remains low.
RESUMEN
Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a very rare disease-causing portal hypertension. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) including essential thrombocythemia (ET) is reported as a risk factor for EHPVO due to underlying persistent thrombophilia.A Japanese woman in her 40s was referred to our hospital with a one-month history of gastric variceal bleeding due to EHPVO. Laboratory investigation demonstrated thrombocytosis despite portal hypertension. She had a mutation of clonal marker JAK2V617F with EHPVO, which prompted us to consult a hematologist. Bone marrow biopsy revealed megakaryocyte lineage proliferation, leading to a diagnosis of ET.Esophagogastroduodenoscopy indicated esophagogastric varices (LsF2CbRC2, Lg-cF1RC1). Abdominal Computed Tomography and angiography revealed splenomegaly and portal vein thrombosis with cavernous transformation. These radiologic findings suggested EHPVO.The patient had a history of ruptured esophagogastric varices and required prophylaxis against further variceal bleeding prior to anti-thrombotic therapy for EHPVO with ET. We performed laparoscopic Hassab's operation followed by endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and hematological cytoreduction therapy.Laparoscopic Hassab's operation and three bi-monthly EVL improved the esophagogastric varix (LmF0RC0, Lg-f F0RC0) at 6 months after surgery. Platelet count decreased to 60.1 x104 /uL by cytoreduction therapy. She was very healthy at 7 months after surgery.Patients with EHPVO are traditionally referred to the gastroenterologist for abdominal pain, intestinal bleeding, or refractory ascites; however, hypercoagulative disease may be occult in such patients and require the attention of a hematologist. When encountering the patients with splanchnic thrombosis caused by EHPVO, the gastroenterologists should screen for hematological disease, including MPN.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy, (HE) although commonly associated with cirrhosis, has also been reported in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). The importance of identifying and treating HE in NCPH lies in the fact that many patients may be wrongly diagnosed as having psychiatric or neurologic disorders. Hence, we aimed to systematically review the prevalence of HE in NCPH. METHODS: A comprehensive search of three databases (Medline, Embase and Scopus) was conducted from inception to November 2022 for studies reporting on the prevalence of minimal HE (MHE) and overt HE (OHE) in patients with NCPH. Results were presented as pooled proportions with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Total 25 studies (n = 1487) were included after screening 551 records. The pooled prevalence of MHE in NPCH was 32.9% (95% CI: 26.7-39.0) without any difference between adult (32.9%, 95% CI: 23.5-42.3) and pediatric patients (32.6%, 95% CI: 26.1-39.1) (p = 0.941). There was no significant difference in the prevalence between patients with NCPH and compensated cirrhosis with odds ratio of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.77-1.44). The pooled event rate for prior history of OHE in NCPH was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.3-2.1). CONCLUSION: Around one-third of the patients with NCPH have MHE, irrespective of age group. OHE is extremely rare in NCPH and is usually associated with a precipitating factor.
Asunto(s)
Encefalopatía Hepática , Hipertensión Portal , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Encefalopatía Hepática/epidemiología , Encefalopatía Hepática/etiología , Prevalencia , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a rare condition characterized by the occlusion or narrowing of the portal vein outside the liver. We present a case report of a patient with EHPVO secondary to combined protein C and S deficiency and pancytopenia secondary to hypersplenism, highlighting the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies. Early recognition of this condition and prompt initiation of appropriate treatment can prevent life-threatening complications such as variceal bleeding and portal hypertension. This case underscores the need for a high index of suspicion for inherited thrombophilias in patients presenting with portal vein thrombosis, particularly in the absence of traditional risk factors.
RESUMEN
Extrahepatic portal vein aneurysm (PVA) is a rare condition in which the extrahepatic portal vein is partially dilated into a sac-like or spindle-like shape. Usually, patients are followed, but surgery is considered in cases of rupture, thrombus, or enlargement. We report a case of thrombus formation in an extrahepatic portal vein aneurysm following trauma that resulted in regression of the aneurysm and extrahepatic portal vein occlusion. Immediately after the trauma, ultrasonography showed moderately hyperechoic structures and comet signs along the vessel wall of the aneurysm and turbulent blood flow in the aneurysm, like in a whirlpool. There were floating point-like echogenic features, which were presumed to be microthrombi. In other words, the trauma might have triggered Virchow's triad: changes in the vessel wall, changes in blood properties, and blood stagnation. This is a valuable case in which ultrasonography imaging revealed interesting changes during the thrombus formation process inside an extrahepatic portal vein aneurysm. The aneurysm's size was reduced by thrombus-induced organization, but the main trunk of the portal vein became deficient in blood flow, resulting in extrahepatic portal vein occlusion. This case is suggestive of the mechanism of extrahepatic portal vein occlusion.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Trombosis , Humanos , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/etiología , Ultrasonografía , Dilatación Patológica , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiologíaRESUMEN
The expression splanchnic vein thrombosis encompasses Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These disorders have common characteristics: they are both rare diseases which can cause portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, among which myeloproliferative neoplasms represent the most common; a rapid comprehensive work-up for risk factors of thrombosis is needed in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis and in those with porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease. The presence and nature of underlying liver disease impacts the management of portal vein thrombosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are growing, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is now a second-line option. Due to the rarity of these diseases, studies yielding high-grade evidence are scarce. However, collaborative studies have provided new insight into the management of these patients. This article focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, or cirrhosis with non-malignant portal vein thrombosis.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the relationship between the angiographic pattern of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) and its etiology and clinical manifestations. METHODS: Clinical, etiological, and angiographic findings in 155 children with EHPVO were reviewed. Anatomy of extrahepatic portal venous system (EPVS) was categorized into five imaging patterns. Assessment of the severity of esophageal and gastric varices (EV and GV) was performed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: Based on multislice CT angiography, most commonly observed pattern of EHPVO was type I (48.4%) and type II (29%). According to anamnesis, 68 (43.8%) children had pathological conditions in neonatal period. Of these, 35 (22.6%) had an umbilical vein catheterization, 11 (7.1%) had a history of omphalitis, and 9 (5.8%) had prolonged jaundice. Thirteen (8.4%) patients had various septic conditions in neonatal period and it was more common associated with widespread thrombosis throughout the EPVS (type 5)-28% of observations. Significantly lower risk of bleeding from EV (p = 0.01) was noted in children with type IV pattern, whereas children with type III and V patterns had higher grades of EV. CONCLUSION: Angiographic pattern of portomesenteric occlusion may provide a clue to its etiology, and clinical manifestation, especially in children with widespread thrombosis throughout the EPVS.
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Hipertensión Portal , Enfermedades Vasculares , Recién Nacido , Niño , Humanos , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/patología , Relevancia Clínica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Hipertensión Portal/diagnóstico por imagen , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) in cirrhotic patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) was a relatively rare disease and had no consensus on the treatment. Our study aimed to explore the value of anticoagulation with warfarin treatment for CTPV cirrhotic patients with EHPVO. METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2019, the clinical characteristics of cirrhotic patients who were diagnosed as CTPV with EHPVO were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were distributed into the anticoagulation group (n = 46) and control group (n = 38). The change of portal vein thrombosis, hepatic decompensation, survival and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up of our patients was 51 months in the anticoagulation group and 44 months in the control group. The progress rate of the portal vein was higher in patients from the control groups (n = 12) than in patients from the anticoagulation group (n = 4, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference between the partial recanalization rate and stable rate between the two groups. Patients in anticoagulation group developed less hepatic decompensation than those in control group (13.0% vs 34.2%, p = 0.021). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that patients in the anticoagulation group had a better prognosis than patients in the control group (P < 0.022). There were no serious complications due to warfarin treatment. CONCLUSION: For CTPV cirrhotic patients with EHPVO, anticoagulation with warfarin treatment was effective and safe. Anticoagulants could prevent portal vein thrombosis progression, hepatic decompensation and death. In addition, our results showed little benefit of anticoagulants on thrombosis recanalization.
RESUMEN
Background/objective: To retrospectively evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of benign hepatic nodules in patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) and assess predictable features for their development. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 18 diagnosed patients of EHPVO who underwent contrast enhanced abdominal MRI at our Institute between June 2016 and May 2017, and who could be followed up for at least two years. The patients with liver nodules formed the study group (n = 8; 4 males, 4 females; mean age: 26.1 ± 10.9 years) and patients without liver nodules were controls (n = 10; 3 males, 7 females; mean age: 24.2 ± 15.1 years). Liver nodules were confirmed as benign by either biopsy or stability on follow up imaging. MRI features of liver nodules were assessed. Clinical details and imaging data of the study group were compared with controls to assess predictable features. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, clinical characteristics and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings between the study and control groups. The size of the lienorenal collateral, left renal vein and superior mesenteric vein were significantly larger in the study group (P < 0.05). In the study group, the majority had multiple hepatic nodules with most of them being isointense on T1 (18/35; 51.4%) and T2-weighted images (16/35; 45.7%) and showing restriction of diffusion (21/35; 60%). All (n = 35) lesions showed arterial phase hyperenhancement and none showed washout in the venous phase. The patients in the control group did not develop any liver nodules during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Liver nodules in patients with EHPVO are likely to be benign and have characteristic MRI features. Significantly larger lienorenal collateral, left renal vein and superior mesenteric vein were associated with the development of these nodules.
RESUMEN
Background & Aims: We aimed to evaluate long-term outcome of patients with chronic non-cirrhotic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (CNC-EHPVO) who underwent portal vein recanalisation (PVR) without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion and to determine factors predicting PVR failure and stent occlusion. Methods: This retrospective monocentric study included all patients who underwent PVR without TIPS insertion in the context of CNC-EHPVO between the years 2000 and 2019. Primary patency was defined by the absence of a complete stent occlusion on follow-up imaging. Results: A total of 31 patients underwent PVR with a median follow-up of 52 months (24-82 months). Indications were gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 13), abdominal pain attributed to CNC-EHPVO (n = 7), prior to abdominal surgery (n = 4), and others (n = 7). Technical success was obtained in 27 patients. PVR failure was associated with extension within the intrahepatic portal veins (p = 0.005) and recanalisation for abdominal pain (p = 0.02). Adverse events occurred in 6 patients with no mortality. Anticoagulation was administered in 21 patients after technical success of PVR. In patients with technical success, 5-year primary patency was 73% and was associated with improved muscle mass (p = 0.007) and decreased spleen volume (p = 0.01) at 1 year. Furthermore, 21 (78%) patients with PVR technical success were free of portal hypertension complication at 5 years. Conclusions: PVR without TIPS insertion was feasible and safe in selected patients with CNC-EHPVO and portal hypertension with past or expected complications. Primary patency at 5 years was obtained in 3 of 4 patients with technical success of PVR and was associated with a control of complications of CNC-EHPVO. PVR was associated with improvement of sarcopenia and decreased spleen volume at 1 year. Lay summary: Patients with chronic obstruction of the portal vein and without cirrhosis or malignancy can develop complications related to the high pressure in the venous system. The present study reports long-term favourable outcome of patients in whom the obstruction was treated with stents.
RESUMEN
Background and Aim: Shunt surgery is the definitive treatment for symptomatic patients with portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (PCC), but few patients are non-surgical candidates or fail to improve even after surgery. This study aims to analyze the long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy in these patients. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients with symptomatic PCC managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) followed by stent placement. Outcomes studied included number of biliary interventions, complications, resolution of stricture, development of decompensation and mortality. Results: Thirty-five patients (68.6% males, median age = 35 years) with a median follow-up duration of 46 months (12-112) were included in the analysis. Presentation was only jaundice in 51.4% cases while one-third (37.1%) of the patients presented with cholangitis. Patients underwent a total of 363 endoscopic sessions with a median of 9 procedures (3-29) per patient. Hemobilia was the most common complication of the procedure (6.06%). Ten (28.5%) patients required frequent stent exchanges. Patients who required frequent stent exchanges had higher number of cholangitis episodes and hospitalization. Secondary biliary cirrhosis developed in 4 (11.4%) patients and 2 (5.7%) patients had mortality. Of the 5 (14.3%) patients who were given a stent free trial, 3 patients required restenting due to redevelopment of symptoms. Conclusion: Patients with PCC without shuntable veins for surgery or those who failed to improve after surgery can be managed long-term with repeated endoscopic intervention with a slightly increased risk of non-fatal hemobilia.