A snapshot audit of global flexible endoscopy practice among European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) surgeons from the EAES Flexible Endoscopy Subcommittee survey.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopy is an essential skill for all surgeons. However, endoscopic competency, training, and practice may vary widely among them. The EAES Flexible Endoscopy Subcommittee is working towards a standardized set of fundamental endoscopic knowledge and skills. To best advise on current practice patterns of flexible endoscopy among surgeons worldwide, a snapshot audit was conducted on the training, use, and limitations of flexible endoscopy in practice. METHODS: An online survey was distributed via email distribution and social media platforms for EAES, SAGES, and WebSurg members. Respondent demographics, training, and practice patterns were assessed. The main outcome measure was the annual endoscopic volume. Multivariate regression and machine learning models analyzed relationships between outcomes and independent variables of age, geographic region, laparoscopic surgery practice, and surgical specialization. RESULTS: A total of 1486 surgeons from 195 countries completed the survey. Respondents were mainly general (n = 894/1486, 60.2%), colorectal (n = 189/1486, 12.7%), bariatric (n = 117/1486, 7.9%), upper gastrointestinal (GI)/foregut (n = 108, 7.3%), hepatobiliopancreatic/HPB (n = 59/1486, 4%), and endocrine surgeons (n = 11/1486, 0.7%) in active practice. Eighty-two percent (n = 1,204) mentioned having used endoscopy in their practice, and 64.7% (n = 961/1486) received formal flexible endoscopy training. Of those performing endoscopy annually, 64.2% (n = 660/1486) performed between 0 and 20 endoscopies, 15.2% (n = 156/1486) performed between 20 and 50 endoscopies, 10.1% (n = 104/1486) performed between 50 and 100 endoscopies, and 10.5% (n = 108/1486) performed over 100 endoscopies. From the regression analysis, there was no statistical correlation between the annual endoscopy volume and age, geographic region, laparoscopic surgery practice, or surgical specialization. Performing advanced endoscopy was directly related to the bariatric subspecialty and to performing over 50% of cases in a minimally invasive fashion. CONCLUSIONS: This international snapshot audit revealed significant heterogeneity in endoscopic practices among surgeons worldwide. There was a nonindependent relationship between endoscopy volumes and other variables tested. Barriers to practicing and receiving endoscopy training were common among respondents. The EAES Flexible Endoscopy Subcommittee will consider such results when developing an equitable and effective standardized flexible endoscopy curriculum.

Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) was historically treated with an open transcervical myotomy with diverticulectomy, but endoscopic approaches have gained popularity, though with little recent data. This study aimed to report flexible endoscopic cricopharyngomyotomy (FEC) outcomes, particularly in smaller diverticula. METHODS: Patients with ZD treated with FEC at a tertiary center were reviewed. Patients were grouped by diverticulum size: small (sZD)≤1.5 â€‹cm; medium (mZD) â€‹> â€‹1.5 â€‹cm. RESULTS: Of 30 patients, median age, BMI, sex, and comorbidities were similar between sZD (n â€‹= â€‹18) and mZD (n â€‹= â€‹12). Overall, 80.0 â€‹% had the procedure performed with a needle knife. Median number of clips for mucosotomy closure (5.0[5.0,6.0]vs.7.0[5.0,7.0]clips;p â€‹= â€‹0.051), operative time (59.5[51.0,75.0]vs.74.5[51.0,93.5]minutes;p â€‹= â€‹0.498), length-of-stay (1.0[1.0,1.0]vs.1.0[1.0,1.0]days;p â€‹= â€‹0.397), and follow-up (20.8[1.1,33.4]vs.15.6[5.4,50.4]months;p â€‹= â€‹0.641) were comparable. There were no postoperative leaks; incomplete myotomy occurred in one sZD, yielding a clinical success rate of 96.7 â€‹%. CONCLUSIONS: FEC has a high success rate for ZD and an advantage in small diverticula, difficult to treat with stapling or open technique.

Insufflation-Free, Perianal Work Platform.

There is an ever increasing volume of colorectal surgery being performed endoscopically by anal access, as well as greater employment of robotics for these procedures. Intraluminal visualization for perianal operations is today dependent on insufflation of the bowel. When full-thickness resections above the peritoneal reflection become necessary, the peritoneal cavity becomes inflated, facilitating infection and necessitating general anesthesia and patient intubation. Our patented tool was originally envisioned to enable abdominal cavity access via a single 2cm port incision, suitable for insufflation-free laparoscopic surgery, under local anesthesia (e.g., cholecystectomy). On further consideration, this instrument was modified to be used for perianal colorectal surgery.

Use of current automatic smoke evacuation system in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy: Its feasibility and potential usefulness.

Objectives: Flexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy. Methods: [Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: "manual suction only," "manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force)," and "manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force)." The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured. Results: [Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; p = 0.011, vs. 70%; p = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; p = 0.012, vs. 70%; p = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (p = 0.041, p = 0.0085). Conclusions: The automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.

A Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach Is Necessary for the Contemporary Management of Esophageal Diverticula.

Background: Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. Results: A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, P < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, P < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.

Awake endoscopic laser surgery for early glottic carcinoma.

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the oncologic efficacy of awake endoscopic laryngeal surgery in the treatment of T1-T2 glottic carcinoma. This is a retrospective study. Seventy-one patients with early glottic carcinoma (T1a- 26, T1b- 18, T2- 27) who underwent awake flexible endoscopic laryngeal surgery under local anesthesia and mild intravenous sedation were included in the study. In 64 cases (90.1%) only endoscopic tumor ablation by Nd:YAG laser (in 32.4% of cases being preceded by diathermy snare excision) was performed, and in 7 T2 cases postoperative radiotherapy was also offered. There were no complications during or after the endoscopic surgery. Ultimate control of disease, including salvage treatment, was obtained in 67 patients (94.4%). Cure without recurrence was achieved in 60 cases (84.5%). Local control without salvage radiotherapy or/and open surgery was achieved in 64 (90.1%) patients. Larynx preservation was obtained in 66 (93.0%) cases. At 5 years from the beginning of endoscopic treatment, 74.6% of the patients were alive and free of disease. The best results were obtained in the T1a group of treated patients, all the patients being free of disease with the preserved larynx. Awake endoscopic laryngeal surgery is a safe and oncologically efficient method of treatment of early glottic carcinoma that can be considered as an alternative to the traditional approach, primarily, for patients with risks/contraindications for radiotherapy, general anesthesia, and transoral microsurgery, and also for the patients who prefer to avoid general anesthesia with its related risks and would rather choose office-based laryngeal surgery.

Various Endoscopic Approaches for Removal of Proventricular Foreign Bodies in Parrots-Three Case Reports.

Although the use of incision-free endoscopy for foreign body (FB) removal in dogs and cats has been extensively documented, its application in birds remains limited. Thus, we present the endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal (GI) FBs from psittacine birds, employing different patient positioning and anesthesia methods. Two blue-and-yellow macaws (Ara ararauna) and a Triton cockatoo (Cacatua galerita triton) were examined. X-ray imaging revealed FBs situated in the proventriculus in each case. The FBs, all identified as feeding tubes, were safely removed using grasping forceps during the endoscopic procedure, and no severe complications occurred. Based on the outcomes of each operation, the most suitable patient position may be ventral recumbency rather than dorsal recumbency, with the use of a mask or endotracheal intubation, depending on the anticipated operation time. However, a larger number of cases would be necessary to confirm the optimal patient positioning and anesthesia method.

Optimal Timing of Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) Testing in General Surgery Residency: Early Is Better.

BACKGROUND: Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) completion is mandatory for certification by the American Board of Surgery (ABS). As early simulation and competency assessment can bolster development of trainee proficiency, we sought to determine the optimal timing for FES examination by evaluating pass rates based on training level and previous endoscopic experience. METHODS: PGY2-5 residents at a university-based medical center who were novice to FES were assigned to complete FES training and testing. Training year, prior endoscopic experience, and FES exam scores were recorded with pre- and post-test surveys. RESULTS: Most residents in the program (88%) were able to complete FES training and testing within a single academic year. Most required only a single faculty-led session (88%) to feel confident to take the exam, augmented by varying numbers of independent practice sessions (50% 1-2, 19% 3-5, 27% > 5). After training, most (84%) felt confident that they would pass the exam, and 93% did so on their first attempt. While higher written exam scores were noted in the PGY5 group, there were no other statistically significant differences in overall pass rates or technical exam scores based on PGY level (p = 0.24). A number of previously completed endoscopic cases did not correlate with exam scores (p = 0.24 written, p = 0.91 technical). CONCLUSION: Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) certification can be successfully completed by junior level general surgery residents regardless of previous endoscopic experience. Moving this exam to earlier training years can benefit resident development and preparedness in the clinical setting without negatively impacting pass rates.

Utilidad de la endoscopia intraoperatoria en cirugía esofagogástrica / The utility of intraoperative endoscopy in esophagogastric surgery

La endoscopia flexible (EF) es un procedimiento de gran utilidad para el manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de lesiones del tracto digestivo superior. A pesar de que su uso intraoperatorio se ha extendido con el paso de los años, su empleo por parte de cirujanos es aún limitado en nuestro medio. Las oportunidades de capacitación en EF varían ampliamente entre instituciones, especialidades y países. La endoscopia intraoperatoria (EIO) presenta ciertas peculiaridades que aumentan su complejidad respecto a la EF estándar. La realización de EIO repercute positivamente en los resultados quirúrgicos aportándoles seguridad y calidad así como disminución de las complicaciones asociadas a estas técnicas. Debido a sus innumerables ventajas, su uso intraoperatorio por parte de cirujanos es actualmente un proyecto vigente en muchos países y forma parte de un futuro próximo en otros, extendiéndose su uso dentro de la especialidad de cirugía general gracias a la creación de proyectos de formación mejor estructurados. En este manuscrito se realiza una revisión y puesta al día de las indicaciones y utilidades de la endoscopia digestiva alta intraoperatoria en la cirugía esofagogástrica. (AU)

Flexible endoscopy (FE) plays a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Although its intraoperative use has spread over the years, its use by surgeons is still limited in our setting. EF training opportunities are different among many institutions, specialties, and countries. Intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) presents peculiarities that increase its complexity compared to standard EF. IOE has a positive impact on surgical results, due to increased safety and quality, as well as a reduction in the complications. Due to its innumerable advantages, its intraoperative use by surgeons is currently a current project in many countries and is part of the near future in others because of the creation of better structured training projects. This manuscript reviews and updates the indications and uses of intraoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in esophagogastric surgery. (AU)

Laryngeal Papillomatosis: A Non-traditional Flexible Endoscopic Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of flexible endoscopic laryngeal surgery (FELS) using unconventional tools in the treatment of laryngeal papillomatosis (LP). METHODS: We applied FELS using forceps, diathermy snare, and Nd:YAG laser for 47 patients with LP. In 38 cases (81%), surgeries were performed under topical anesthesia with spontaneous respiration and in seven cases we used general anesthesia with superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation. In two cases, both types of anesthesia were used in different sessions. In 22 cases (46.8%), the interventions were performed as outpatient procedures. The Nd:YAG laser was used in the majority (89.4%) of cases. RESULTS: The expected result (complete eradication of the visible lesion) was obtained in all treated patients without procedure complications. Disease recurrence was established in 16 cases (34%) that led to repeated surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: FELS, using Nd:YAG laser as a main tool, is a safe and effective approach that can be a feasible alternative to the conventional approach in the treatment of LP due to possibility to avoid repeated general anesthesia with its associated risks; applicability for the patients, who have contraindications for general anesthesia and transoral microsurgery; possibility to perform the intervention in an outpatient setting that leads to essential reduction of medical costs; economy of time. Nd:YAG laser ablation, preceded by diathermy snare resection, allows reducing the time of the intervention and thermal injury of the adjacent tissues, compared to using laser alone, and can be used in bulky and obstructive lesions that present a limitation for nonablative techniques.

Ensayo clínico multicéntrico para la resección de pólipos rectales mediante un nuevo dispositivo de acceso transanal híbrido laparoendoscópico / Multicenter clinical trial for the resection of rectal polyps using a new laparoendoscopic hybrid transanal access device

Introducción: Los pólipos complejos requieren el uso de técnicas endoscópicas avanzadas o la cirugía mínimamente invasiva para su abordaje. En los pólipos rectales es de especial relevancia llegar a un consenso de cuál es el mejor abordaje de estos para evitar infratratamientos o sobretratamientos que incrementen una morbimortalidad innecesaria. Métodos: Se describe un ensayo clínico piloto con un producto sanitario de primer uso en humanos multicéntrico y prospectivo. Se plantea la hipótesis que UNI-VEC® facilita la cirugía laparoendoscópica transanal para la extirpación de tumores rectales precoces. El objetivo principal es evaluar que es seguro y cumple los requisitos funcionales establecidos. Los secundarios son evaluar resultados, complicaciones y nivel de satisfacción.Resultados: Se reclutaron 16 pacientes en 12 meses con un seguimiento mínimo de dos meses. El tamaño medio ha sido de 3,4 cm, siendo el pólipo mayor de 6 cm. Respecto a la localización, la media se encontraba a 6,6 cm del margen anal. Se realizó resección endoscópica mucosa (REM) (6,3%), disección submucosa endoscópica (DSE) (43,8%), resección espesor completo (REC) (6,3%) y transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) (43,8%). El tiempo medio fueron 73,25 min; 56,3% utiliza una cámara de 30̊ y 43,8% el endoscopio flexible como instrumento de visión. El 56,3% son lesiones benignas y 43,8% malignas. En 87,5% se consigue resección completa. En cuanto a las complicaciones, se presenta sangrado leve (Clavien I) en 25, 6,3 y 21,4% a las 24 h, 48 h y siete días, respectivamente. La continencia se valora según la Escala de Wexner. A los siete días, 60% presentan continencia perfecta, 26,7% IF leve y 13,3% IF moderada. A los 30 días, 66,7% continencia perfecta, 20% IF leve y 13,3% IF moderada. A los dos meses se revisan cuatro de los pacientes que a los 30 días presentaban un Wexner superior al preoperatorio y se demuestra continencia perfecta en 25% de los pacientes, 50% leve y 25% moderada. (AU)

Introduction: Complex polyps require the use of advanced endoscopic techniques or minimally invasive surgery for their approach. In rectal polyps it is of special relevance to reach a consensus on the best approach to avoid under- or overtreatment that increases unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Methods: We describe a prospective, multicenter, pilot clinical trial with a first-in-human medical device. It is hypothesized that UNI-VEC® facilitates transanal laparoendoscopic surgery for the removal of early rectal tumors. The primary objective is to evaluate that it is safe and meets the established functional requirements. Secondary objectives are to evaluate results, complications and level of satisfaction. Results: Sixteen patients were recruited in 12 months with a minimum follow-up of 2 months. The mean size was 3.4 cm with the largest polyp being 6 cm. Regarding location, the mean was 6.6 cm from the anal margin. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (6.3%), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (43.8%), REC (6.3%) and TAMIS (43.8%) were performed. The mean time was 73.25 min. The 56.3% used a 30° camera and 43.8% used the flexible endoscope as a viewing instrument. The 56.3% were benign lesions and 43.8% malignant. Complete resection is achieved in 87.5%. Regarding complications, mild bleeding (Clavien I) occurred in 25%, 6.3% and 21.4% at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days, respectively. Continence was assessed according to the Wexner scale. At 7 days, 60% showed perfect continence, 26.7% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 30 days, 66.7% had perfect continence, 20% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 2 months, 4 patients were reviewed who at 30 days had a Wexner's degree higher than preoperative and perfect continence was demonstrated in 25% of the patients, 50% mild and 25% moderate. (AU)

Management of the Zenker diverticulum: multicenter retrospective comparative study of open surgery and rigid endoscopy versus flexible endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Zenker's diverticulum is a rare disease that affects quality of life due to dysphagia and regurgitation. This condition can be treated by various surgical or endoscopic methods. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients treated for Zenker's diverticulum in three centers in the south of France between 2014 and 2019 were included. The primary objective was clinical efficacy. Secondary objectives were technical success, morbidities, recurrences, and need for a new procedure. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients with a total of one hundred sixty-five procedures performed were included. A significant difference was found between the different groups in terms of clinical success (97% for open surgery versus 79% for rigid endoscopy versus 90% for flexible endoscopy, p = 0.009). Technical failure occurred more frequently in the rigid endoscopy group than in the flexible endoscopy and surgical groups (p = 0.014). Median procedure duration, median time to resumption of feeding, and hospital discharge were statistically shorter for endoscopies than for open surgery. On the other hand, more recurrences occurred in patients treated by endoscopy than those treated by surgery, and more reinterventions were required. CONCLUSION: Flexible endoscopy appears to be as effective and safe as open surgery in the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Endoscopy allows a shorter hospital stay at the expense of a higher risk of recurrence of symptoms. It could be used as an alternative to open surgery for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum, especially in frail patients.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum: a retrospective multicenter study.

Zenker per-oral endoscopic myotomy (ZPOEM) has become a promising technique for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). The aim of this study was to add to the limited body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of ZPOEM. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent ZPOEM at two separate institutions between January 2020 and January 2022. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, intraoperative data, adverse events, and length of stay were analyzed. A total of 40 patients (mean age 72.5 years, 62.5% male) were included. Average operative time was 54.7 minutes and average length of stay was 1.1 days. There were three adverse events, and only one was related to the technical aspects of the procedure. Patients showed improvement in the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores at 1 month (5 vs 7, p < 0.0001). The median FOIS scores remained 7 at both 6 and 12 months, although this improvement was not statistically significant at these time intervals (p = 0.46 and 0.37, respectively). Median dysphagia scores were decreased at 1 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), 6 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), and 12 months (2.5 vs 0, p = 0.016). The number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom was also decreased at 1 (40 vs 9, p < 0.0001) and 6 months (40 vs 1, p = 0.041). Although the number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom remained consistent at 12 months, this was not statistically significant (40 vs 1, p = 0.13). ZPOEM is a safe and highly effective treatment for the management of ZD. .

Flexible Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Nonepithelial Lesions of the Larynx.

Aims: The traditional approach for the management of benign laryngeal lesions is transoral microsurgery. In cases of anatomic particularities, such as insufficient cervical extension, short mandible, temporomandibular joint ankylosis etc., and contraindications for general anesthesia, transoral microsurgery is not possible. In such cases transnasal flexible endoscopic surgery under local anesthesia can be a relevant alternative. The purpose of the study was to assess the possibilities of flexible endoscopic management of benign nonepithelial lesions of the larynx. Materials and methods: Flexible endoscopic surgical interventions were performed on 315 patients with different benign nonepithelial lesions of the larynx. The larynx pathology was represented by following lesions: myxoid polyp, polypoid degeneration of vocal folds, fibrous polyp, angiofibrous polyp, angiomatous polyp, nonspecific granuloma, cyst, lipoma, neurofibroma and amyloidosis. In 97,8% of the cases interventions were performed under local anesthesia with spontaneous respiration. In 88,6% of the cases interventions were performed as outpatient procedures. Results: In all the cases the expected result was obtained - complete ablation of the visible lesion. In 7 cases repeated interventions were performed for recurrent lesions. Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic surgery is an efficient method for the treatment of benign nonepithelial lesions of the larynx, that offers a relevant therapeutic alternative, especially for the patients who have contraindications for general anesthesia or transoral microsurgery. The advantages of the method, worthy of mentionning, are positive economic effect and time economy, the intervention being possible in an outpatient setting for the majority of patients. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03444-z.

Study on impact of flexible endoscopy training course for surgeons in India.

Context: Competence in flexible endoscopy is essential for all surgeons during this era of minimal access surgery. However, fewer surgeons have expertise in endoscopy due to a lack of training and interest. The Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons devised a short-structured training course in the art and science of endoscopy. Aims: This study aimed to find the impact of the endoscopy training course (Endoscopic Fellowship of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons [EFIAGES]) in improving the endoscopic skill of surgeons. Settings and Design: Twenty-two-part electronic survey forms were sent to all 375 candidates who took the course between 2016 and 2019 for this retrospective observational study. Subjects and Methods: The following outcome measures were noted, namely technical competence in endoscopy before the course, delegate feedback about the course modules, volume of endoscopies before and after the course and quality indicators such as reaching up to duodenum (D2) and caecum before and after the course. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis of the impact of the course was done using Chi-square test. Results: Responses from 262 out of a total of 375 candidates were received. Seventy-seven per cent of trainees were pleased with content and mode of conduct of the course. The quality indicator of gastroscopy with the ability to reach D2 in 90% of the caseload was achieved by only 28% of trainees before the EFIAGES. This increased to 72% of candidates after the course and similar results were seen with colonoscopy also. Most of the candidates noted a distinct improvement in their endoscopic navigation skills subsequent to the course. Conclusions: Endoscopy skill transfer was possible with a short-structured endoscopy course. The surgical fraternity should realise the importance of endoscopy skills in the current era of surgical practice.

The utility of intraoperative endoscopy in esophagogastric surgery.

Flexible endoscopy (FE) plays a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Although its intraoperative use has spread over the years, its use by surgeons is still limited in our setting. FE training opportunities are different among many institutions, specialties, and countries. Intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) presents peculiarities that increase its complexity compared to standard FE. IOE has a positive impact on surgical results, due to increased safety and quality, as well as a reduction in the complications. Due to its innumerable advantages, its intraoperative use by surgeons is currently a current project in many countries and is part of the near future in others because of the creation of better structured training projects. This manuscript reviews and updates the indications and uses of intraoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in esophagogastric surgery.

Differences in Glottal Closure and Visibility of the Anterior Commissure during Rigid-90°, Rigid-70°, and Flexible Laryngostroboscopy.

INTRODUCTION: The conventional rigid-90° and rigid-70° laryngostroboscopy has been so far considered the gold standard in assessing the vibratory behavior of the vocal folds and the glottal closure configuration during phonation. Meanwhile, this rigid laryngostroboscopy is more and more replaced by flexible chip-on-tip systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of these different endoscopic techniques on glottal closure configuration and on visibility of the complete focal fold length including anterior commissure during phonation. METHODS: Twenty-one euphonic subjects were enrolled (mean age 34.6 ± 9.5; m = 10, f = 11). They were examined with the three laryngoscopic techniques (conventional rigid-90°, rigid-70°, and flexible chip-on-tip laryngoscopy during low and high voice pitch with soft and loud voice intensity). For evaluating the degree of glottal closure, a modified classification of Södersten et al. was applied and the visibility of the anterior commissure was evaluated. The correlation of the three endoscopic techniques was assessed with Cohen and Fleiss' kappa. RESULTS: In even low loud phonation, the rigid-90° and rigid-70° endoscopies revealed a complete closure of the glottis in only 47.6% of subjects but with flexible endoscopy in 81%. The complete vocal fold length with anterior commissure was best visible with flexible endoscopy in 90.5% in low-soft and high-soft phonation. The rigid-90° endoscopy showed a slight agreement in comparison with the flexible endoscopy in regard to the types of vocal fold closure with a Cohen's kappa coefficient k = 0.199. The rigid-90° endoscopy showed an almost perfect agreement with k = 0.84 when compared to the rigid-70° endoscopy. The flexible endoscopy compared to the rigid-70° endoscopy showed a fair agreement with k = 0.346. CONCLUSION: We found mainly corresponding results in both rigid-90° and rigid-70° endoscopic techniques which can be explained by the same transoral approach with the tongue pulled out, whereas the flexible transnasal endoscopy mainly gives a better view on the anterior commissure. The influence of transorally or transnasally guided endoscopic techniques needs to be considered in interpretation of laryngostroboscopic parameters like vocal fold closure and supraglottal hyperactivity.

Sentinel node identification in laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinoma after flexible endoscopy-guided tracer injection under topical anesthesia: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of flexible endoscopy-guided tracer injection for sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification in patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: Sixteen cT1-4N0-2M0 patients with laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinoma underwent intra- and peritumoral [99m Tc]Tc-nanocolloid injections after topical anesthesia under endoscopic guidance. SPECT-CT scans were performed at two time points. RESULTS: Tracer injection and visualization of SLNs was successful in 15/16 (94%) patients. Median number of tracer injections was 1 intratumoral and 3 peritumoral. The median duration of the endoscopic procedure including tracer injection after biopsy taking was 7 min (range 4-16 min). A total of 28 SLNs were identified which were all visualized on the early and late SPECT-CT. Most SLNs were visualized in neck levels II and III. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endoscopy-guided tracer injection for SLN identification is a feasible and fast procedure in laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinoma patients.