Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to quantify the head excursions of pediatric anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) seated in rearward-facing child restraint system (CRS) models during rear impact sled tests and compare to roof heights of vehicles in the current fleet to assess the possibility of head contact against the vehicle roof. METHODS: Head excursions of ATDs seated in rearward-facing CRS models were analyzed from high-speed video data from 14 rear impact sled tests across two different series. Tests were conducted in rigidized vehicle seats from recent model year vehicles. Rearward-facing infant and convertible CRS models were tested with a variety of pediatric ATDs aged 12 months to 6 years in a variety of installation conditions (e.g., lower anchors or seat belt, anti-rotation features, etc). Maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback were compared to previously measured roof heights of 87 different vehicles. RESULTS: The roof heights in all sedan seating positions (n = 58) and SUV/CUV/minivan seating positions (n = 60) were greater than the largest maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback (792 mm). Head contact was possible in two of the pickup trucks which had roof heights of 730 and 775 mm. In all, 98% of vehicle seating positions measured in this study would accommodate all of the maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback without contact. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of head contact against the vehicle interior roof appears low as maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback were typically not great enough to reach the rooflines of the vehicles in the sample. Head contact appears possible in pickup trucks, where the window/roofline is directly behind the head restraint.

Comparative performance of rearward and forward-facing child restraint systems with common use errors: Effect on crash injury risk for a 1-year-old occupant.

OBJECTIVE: To compare how errors in child restraint use influence crash injury risk in rearward and forward-facing restraints for a 1-year old occupant. METHODS: Three convertible child restraint systems (CRS) were subjected to frontal dynamic sled tests at 56 km/h in rearward-facing and forward-facing modes in a correct use (baseline) condition and in five incorrect use conditions: loose securing belt, loose harness, partial harness use, top tether slack, and three minor errors. Excursion, head, and chest 3 ms resultant acceleration, HIC15, and neck forces and moments of a Q1 anthropomorphic test device (ATD) seated in the restraints were measured. The effect of incorrect use on each outcome and restraint type was analyzed. RESULTS: The influence of errors varied across different outcome variables, the three restraints tested and orientation modes. Excursion increased in four of five incorrect use conditions in both rearward and forward-facing orientations. A very loose harness increased four of five outcome variables in at least one forward-facing restraint, whereas only excursion was increased when rearward-facing. Overall, there tended to be a more negative effect of incorrect use (demonstrated through increases in outcome variables compared to the baseline) in the forward-facing orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, errors in use tended to have a larger negative impact on forward-facing restraints than rearward-facing restraints. Given the widespread nature of errors in use, this adds further weight to arguments to keep children rearward-facing to 12 months of age and older. The results also highlight a variation in response to errors across differently designed restraints, suggesting the influence of errors may be minimized by restraint design that is more resistant to errors.

Investigation of occupant kinematics and injury risk in a reclined and rearward-facing seat under various frontal crash velocities.

INTRODUCTION: The availability of highly automated driving functions will vastly change the seating configuration in future vehicles. A reclined and rearward-facing seating position could become one of the popular seating positions. The occupant safety needs to be addressed in these novel seating configurations, as novel occupant loading conditions occur and the current standards as well as regulations are not fully applicable. METHOD: Twelve finite element simulations using a series production seat model and a state of the art 50th percentile male human body model were conducted to investigate the influences of various parameters on the occupant kinematics and injury risk. The varied parameters included the seatback angle, impact speed, and seatback rotational stiffness. RESULTS: The seat model shows a large seatback rotation angle during the frontal crash scenario with high impact speed. A reclining of the seatback angle leads to no significant increase of the injury risk for the assessed injury values. However, the reclining does affect the interaction among the occupant, seatbelt, and seatback. An increase of the seatback rotational stiffness helps reduce brain and chest injury metrics, while neck injury values are higher for the stiffer seatback.