Prophylactic ureteral stent in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

PURPOSE: Accidental ureteric injury during colorectal surgery is a rare but dreadful event. It is associated with a higher risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Prophylactic placement of double J stents could improve ureteral identification and decrease the chance of accidental ureteral injury. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies published until March 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics, with p-values inferior to 0.10 and I2 > 25% considered significant. Statistical analysis was conducted in RStudio version 4.4.1. RESULTS: Eleven observational studies were included, comprising 71,784 patients. Among them, 11,723 (16.4%) were submitted to a prophylactic ureteral stent while 59,961 (83.6%) were not. There was no significant difference in ureteral injury between the groups (0.66% vs 0.8%; OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.43-4.87; p = 0.552; I2 = 56%). Prophylactic stent placement was associated with an increase in AKI (1.7% vs. 0.56%; OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.24-1.91; p < 0.001; I2 = 44%), operative time (MD 24.8 min; 95% CI 4.9-44.8; p = 0.01; I2 = 91%), and a decrease in mortality (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.05-0.23; p < 0.001; I2 = 42%). No differences were observed in UTI, hematuria, length of hospital stays, and reoperation. CONCLUSION: In colorectal surgery, prophylactic ureteral stents were associated with increased AKI and operative time. No significant difference was observed in ureteral injury, UTI, hematuria, length of hospital stays, and reoperation.

Sole Stenting versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Treating Dissecting Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Among the reconstructive methods for treating dissecting posterior circulation aneurysms, there are stent-assisted coiling (SAC), and sole stenting (SS) therapy. Despite SAC being widely employed when compared to SS, no study systematically analyzed the difference in their outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies employing both therapies to compare their outcomes. A search was performed in January 2024, including only studies with consecutive patients submitted to SS or SAC. The studies had to have at least one of the following outcomes: complete aneurysm occlusion, complications, mortality, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment, and good clinical outcome. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized for statistics. RESULTS: In a pooled analysis of 17 studies, comparing 173 SS and 377 SAC procedures for dissecting posterior circulation aneurysms, no significant differences were found in related mortality (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.49-4.27); total mortality (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.53-3.37); retreatment (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.16-1.26); recurrence (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.43-2.33); postoperative complete aneurysmal occlusion (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.09-6.77); follow-up complete aneurysmal occlusion (OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.62-3.94); intraoperative complications (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.29-3.73); postoperative complications (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.61-2.45); hemorrhagic complications (OR 2.16; 95% CI 0.77-6.06); ischemic complications (OR 1.68; 95% CI 0.68-4.15). Good clinical outcomes significantly favored SAC (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest there is no substantial basis for favoring SAC over SS across all cases. Instead, an individualized approach should be considered, according to the patient's characteristics, surgeon skills, and the available material.

Numerical analysis of blood flow in a branched modular stent-graft for aneurysms covering all zones of the aortic arch.

Due to the anatomical complexity of the aortic arch for the development of stent-grafts for total repair, this region remains without a validated and routinely used endovascular option. In this work, a modular stent-graft for aneurysms that covers all aortic arch zones, proposed by us and previously structurally evaluated, was evaluated from the point of view of haemodynamics using fluid-structural numerical simulations. Blood was assumed to be non-Newtonian shear-thinning using the Carreau model, and the arterial wall was assumed to be anisotropic hyperelastic using the Holzapfel model. Nitinol and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE-e) were used as materials for the stents and the graft, respectively. Nitinol was modelled as a superelastic material with shape memory by the Auricchio model, and PTFE-e was modelled as an isotropic linear elastic material. To validate the numerical model, a silicone model representative of the aneurysmal aorta was subjected to tests on an experimental bench representative of the circulatory system. The numerical results showed that the stent-graft restored flow behaviour, making it less oscillatory, but increasing the strain rate, turbulence kinetic energy, and viscosity compared to the pathological case. Taking the mean of the entire cycle, the increase in turbulence kinetic energy was 198.82% in the brachiocephalic trunk, 144.63% in the left common carotid artery and 284.03% in the left subclavian artery after stent-graft implantation. Based on wall shear stress parameters, it was possible to identify that the internal branches of the stent-graft and the stent-graft fixation sites in the artery were the most favourable regions for the deposition and accumulation of thrombus. In these regions, the oscillating shear index reached the maximum value of 0.5 and the time-averaged wall shear stress was close to zero, which led the relative residence time to reach values above 15 Pa-1. The stent-graft was able to preserve flow in the supra-aortic branches.

Comparing open and closed cell stents in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Background: Open cell stents (OC) and closed cell stents (CC) each offer unique advantages and potential drawbacks in the context of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) treatment. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of using OC and CC for IIH.Methods: We conducted a systematic review in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases following the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included ≥4 patients with IIH treated by OC or CC. Primary outcomes were headache, visual acuity, and papilledema status before and after the procedure. Additionally, failure rate, minor complications, major complications, and total complications were assessed. Pooled analysis of the OC group and CC group were done separately and then compared.Results: Twenty-four studies were included. Of these, 20 reported on OC and 6 reported on CC. Pooled analysis of failure rate was 8% (4%-12%) in OC and 5% (0%-11%) in CC. For headache improvement rate: 78% (70%-86%) in OC and 81% (66%-69%) in CC. For visual acuity improvement: 78% (65%-92%) in OC and 76% (29%-100%) in CC. For papilledema improvement: 88% (77%-98%) in OC and 82% (67%-98%) in CC. For minor complications: 0% (0%-1%) in OC and 0% (0%-2%) in CC. For major complications: 0% (0%-1%) in OC and 2% (0%-6%) in CC. Total complications: 0% (0%-1%) in OC and 2% (0%-6%) in CC.Conclusion: Low failure and complication rates were found in both OC and CC, with no significant difference between them in effectiveness. The CC showed a slight but significant increase in major and total complications compared to the OC. Additionally, a subtle yet significantly lower failure rate was identified in the CC.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on the Coronary Revascularization Guided by Intracoronary Physiology: Results of the First Registry with Long-Term Follow-Up in a Latin American Population.

The use of invasive physiology methods in patients with renal dysfunction is not well elucidated. Our objective was to evaluate the in-hospital and long-term results of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 151 patients from January 2018 to January 2022, divided into 2 groups: CKD (81 patients [114 lesions]) and non-CKD (70 patients [117 lesions]). The mean age was higher (p < 0.001), body mass index was lower (p = 0.007), contrast volume used was lower (p = 0.02) and the number of ischemic lesions/patients was higher (p = 0.005) in the CKD group. The primary outcomes (rate of major adverse cardiac events during follow-up, defined as death, infarction, and need for new revascularization) in the CKD and non-CKD groups were 22.07% and 14.92%, respectively (p = 0.363). There was a significant difference in the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate (11.68%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.02), this initial statistical difference was not significant after adjusting for variables in the logistic regression model. There was no difference between the rates of death from all causes (6.49%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.15), reinfarction (3.89%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.394), and need for new revascularization (11.68%, CKD group vs. 5.97%, non-CKD group, p = 0.297). As there was no difference in the endpoints between groups with long-term follow-up, this study demonstrated the safety of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with CKD.

Safety and Performance of a Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Hemodialysis Vascular Access Outflow Stenosis: A Brazilian Multicenter Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and performance of Wrapsody™, a cell-impermeable endoprosthesis (CIE), for treating hemodialysis vascular access outflow stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators retrospectively analyzed 113 hemodialysis patients treated with a CIE (11/2021-12/2022) across four centers in Brazil. De novo or restenotic lesions were treated. The primary efficacy outcome measure was target lesion primary patency (TLPP) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; the primary safety outcome measure was the absence of serious local or systemic adverse events within the first 30 days post-procedure. Secondary outcome measures included technical and procedural success, access circuit primary patency (ACPP), and secondary patency at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (34.5%) had thrombosed access at the initial presentation, and 38 patients (33.6%) presented with recurrent stenosis. TLPP rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 100%, 96.4%, 86.4%, and 69.7%, respectively. ACPP rates were 100% at 1 month, 89.2% at 3 months, 70.9% at 6 months, and 56.0% at 12 months. The target lesion secondary patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 100%, 97.3%, 93.6%, and 91.7%, respectively. In the adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, male sex and endoprosthesis with diameters of 10, 12, 14, and 16 mm were associated with improved primary patency rates. No localized or systemic serious adverse event was observed through the first 30 days post-procedure. CONCLUSION: The CIE evaluated in this study is safe and effective for treating peripheral and central outflow stenoses in hemodialysis vascular access. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b, cohort study.

Simplified Models to Assess the Mechanical Performance Parameters of Stents.

Ischemic heart disease remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, which has promoted extensive therapeutic efforts. Stenting has emerged as the primary intervention, particularly among individuals aged 70 years and older. The geometric specifications of stents must align with various mechanical performance criteria outlined by regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Finite element method (FEM) analysis and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) serve as essential tools to assess the mechanical performance parameters of stents. However, the growing complexity of the numerical models presents significant challenges. Herein, we propose a method to determine the mechanical performance parameters of stents using a simplified FEM model comprising solid and shell elements. In addition, a baseline model of a stent is developed and validated with experimental data, considering parameters such as foreshortening, radial recoil, radial recoil index, and radial stiffness of stents. The results of the simplified FEM model agree well with the baseline model, decreasing up to 80% in computational time. This method can be employed to design stents with specific mechanical performance parameters that satisfy the requirements of each patient.

Resultados del uso de prótesis endoscópica colorrectal. 15 años de experiencia

Objetivo: Describir morbimortalidad asociada al uso de prótesis colorrectales (PC) e identificar factores asociados a sus complicaciones durante los años 2007 a 2022 en Clínica INDISA. Material y Método: Estudio transversal retrospectivo basado en registro clínico. Resultados: Se instalaron 49 PC con un 100% de éxito de desobstrucción. El 87,8% en colon izquierdo. La etiología principal fue la patología maligna 91,8% y el 85,7% de ellos fueron primarios colorrectales. Se instalaron 34 como tratamiento paliativo (TP), 12 como puente a cirugía electiva (PCE) y 3 por patología benigna. La tasa de complicaciones fue de 26,5% (7 estenosis, 4 perforaciones y 2 migraciones). La mortalidad asociada fue de 4,1% (2 pacientes). El grupo de complicados fue más joven, con etapas oncológicas más avanzadas y con estenosis en rectosigmoides(p < 0,005). Los menores de 50 años tuvieron 5 veces más riesgo de alguna complicación (OR = 5,0;IC95%:1,09-23,0; p = 0,039). Discusión: El uso de PC tiene baja morbimortalidad. Su uso principal es como TP o PCE en obstrucción colorrectal maligna, con alta tasa de desobstrucción. Está asociado con menor morbilidad que la cirugía de urgencia, menor tasa de ostomía y mayor cosecha ganglionar. La instalación como puente se asocia además a mayor tasa de anastomosis primaria. Nuestra serie mostró mayor tasa de complicación en aquellos con tumores avanzados y más jóvenes. Conclusión: El uso de PC es seguro y con baja morbimortalidad. La principal indicación es en neoplasia colorrectal obstructiva como TP. Tienen mayor riesgo de complicación los pacientes jóvenes y los tumores colorrectales avanzados con ganglios peri tumorales.

Objective: To describe morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal prostheses (CP) and identify factors associated with their complications during the 2007 to 2022 at INDISA Clinic. Material and Method: Retrospective cross-sectional study based on clinical registry. Results: 49 CPs were installed with 100% clearing success. 87.8% in left colon. The main etiology was malignant 91.8% and 85.7% were primary colorectal. 34 were installed with palliative intention, 12 as a bridge to elective surgery (BTS) and 3 for benign pathology. There were 13 (26.5%) patients with adverse effects (7 strictures, 4 perforations and 2 migrations). Associated mortality was 4.1% (2 patients). The complicated group was younger, with more advanced oncological stages and rectosigmoid stenosis (p < 0.005). Those under 50 years of age had 5 times higher risk of some complication (OR = 5.0; 95% CI: 1.09-23.0; p = 0.039). Discussion: The use of CPs has low short-term morbidity and mortality. Its main use is as palliative treatment or BTS in malignant colorectal obstruction. It's a high clearance rate. It is associated with less morbidity than emergency surgery, a lower ostomy rate, and a higher lymph node harvest. Installation as a bridge is also associated with a higher rate of primary anastomosis. Our group showed a higher complication rate in those with advanced and younger tumors. Conclusion: The use of CPs is safe, with low morbidity and mortality. The main indication is in obstructive colorectal neoplasia as palliative treatment. Young patients and advanced colorectal tumors with peritumoral nodes have a higher risk of complications.

[Angioplasty with ductal stent: experience at Garrahan Hospital]. / Angioplastia con stent ductal: experiencia en el Hospital Garrahan.

Objective: To describe and evaluate the outcomes of ductal angioplasty with stent placement at a single high-complexity center during the period 2016-2022. Method: A retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted, including patients under 3 months of age who underwent ductal stent implantation as initial palliative treatment. Demographic, clinical, and anatomical data were collected before the intervention. Mortality, intra- and post-procedural complications, need for re-intervention, intensive care requirements, and hospital stay were recorded. The characteristics at the time of definitive surgery are described. Discrete variables are presented as percentages, and continuous variables are presented with their medians and respective interquartile ranges. Results: Twenty patients who underwent this treatment were reviewed, revealing a success rate of 80%. Complications due to stent dysfunction required surgical resolution. 95% of patients were dischargedfrom the institution after the procedure, and 17 patients reached a second definitive surgical stage. Three patients died afterthe procedure, but with no direct relation to it. Conclusions: Indications for ductal angioplasty with stent as an alternative treatment to systemic-pulmonary anastomosis by surgery are not yet fully defined; the strategy represents a valid alternative in appropriately selected patients. The presented experience shows results similar to international reference centers.

Objetivo: Describir y evaluar los resultados de la angioplastia con stent ductal en un único centro de alta complejidad durante el periodo 2016-2022. Método: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversal en el que se incluyeron pacientes menores de 3 meses a quienes se implantó un stent en el conducto arterioso como tratamiento paliativo inicial. Se recolectaron datos demográficos, clínicos y anatómicos previos a la intervención. Se registraron la mortalidad, las complicaciones intra- y posprocedimiento, la necesidad de reintervención, los requerimientos de cuidados intensivos y la estadía hospitalaria. Se describen las características al momento de la cirugía definitiva. Las variables discretas son presentadas con porcentajes, y las variables continuas con sus medianas y sus respectivos intervalos intercuartílicos. Resultados: Se revisaron 20 pacientes que habían recibido este tratamiento y se evidenció una tasa de éxito del 80%. Las complicaciones por disfunción del stent requirieron resolución quirúrgica. Egresaron de la institución el 95% de los pacientes luego del procedimiento y lograron arribar a un segundo estadio quirúrgico definitivo 17 pacientes. Fallecieron tres pacientes luego del procedimiento, pero sin relación directa con este. Conclusiones: Las indicaciones de angioplastia del conducto con stent como tratamiento alternativo a la realización de una anastomosis sistémico-pulmonar por cirugía todavía no están completamente definidas; la estrategia constituye una alternativa válida en pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados. La experiencia presentada muestra resultados similares a los de otros centros de referencia internacional.

A Modified Single-Stage Endoscopic Repair for Bilateral Choanal Atresia.

The work illustrates a step-by-step surgical approach to demonstrate technical feasibility of a single-stage endoscopic repair for bilateral choanal atresia with adjuvant bioabsorbable steroid-eluting stent placement to safely mitigate unique perioperative challenges in the pediatric population. Laryngoscope, 134:4414-4417, 2024.

High risk of coronary artery obstruction during TAVR, how to avoid it?

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery obstruction after percutaneous aortic replacement is a complication with high short-term mortality secondary to the lack of timely treatment. There are various predictors of coronary obstruction prior to valve placement such as the distance from the ostia, the degree of calcification, the distance from the sinuses; In such a situation some measures must be taken to prevent and treat coronary obstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: An 84-year-old male, with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk, who was treated with TAVR. However, during the deployment of the valve he presented hemodynamic instability secondary to LMCA obstruction. The intravascular image showed obstruction of the ostium secondary to the displacement of calcium that he was successfully treated with a chimney stent technique. CONCLUSIONS: The high degree of calcification and the left ostium near the annulus are conditions for obstruction of the ostium at the time of valve release; In this context, provisional stenting prior to TAVR in patients at high risk of obstruction should be considered as a safe prevention strategy to achieve the success of the procedure.

Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent versus endoscopy vacuum therapy for traumatic esophageal perforations: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic esophageal perforations (TEP) are a grave medical condition and require immediate intervention. Techniques such as Esophageal Self-Expandable Metal Stent (E-SEMS) and Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) show promise in reducing tissue damage and controlling esophageal leakage. The present study aims to compare the application of EVT to E-SEMS placement in TEP. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study valuated 30 patients with TEP. The E-SEMS and EVT groups were assessed for time of hospitalization, treatment duration, costs, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Patients treated with EVT (24.4 ± 13.2) demonstrated significantly shorter treatment duration (p < 0.005) compared to the group treated with E-SEMS (45.8 ± 12.9) and patients submitted to E-SEMS demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in the time of hospitalization compared to the EVT (34 ± 2 vs 82 ± 5 days). Both groups demonstrated a satisfactory discharge rate (E-SEMS 93.7% vs EVT 71.4%) but did not show statistically significant difference (p = 0.3155). E-SEMS treatment had a lower mean cost than EVT (p < 0.05). Descriptive statistics were utilized, arranged in table form, where frequencies, percentages, mean, median, and standard deviation of the study variables were calculated and counted. The Fisher's Exact Test was used to evaluate the relationship between two categorical variables. To evaluate differences between means and central points, the parametric t-test was utilized. Comparisons with p value up to 0.05 were considered significant. CONCLUSION: E-SEMS showed a shorter time of hospitalization, but a longer duration of treatment compared to EVT. The placement of E-SEMS and EVT had the same clinical outcome. Treatment with E-SEMS had a lower cost compared with EVT.

Safety and efficacy of a new covered stent in hemodialysis vascular access outflow stenosis: A Brazilian multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular stenosis commonly leads to dysfunction in hemodialysis vascular access. Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is an established treatment, stent utilization has increased in the last decade as an alternative solution to extend the access function. This study evaluated the safety and initial results of a new impermeable covered stent for treating vascular access outflow stenosis. METHODS: Investigators retrospectively analyzed 114 hemodialysis patients treated with polytetrafluorethylene-covered stents from September 2018 to September 2022 across four centers. Lesions treated were de novo or restenotic and located in the venous graft anastomosis, outflow segment, cephalic arch, and basilic swing point. Patients were followed by in-person physical examination at 1, 3, and 6 months, and Duplex ultrasound was performed to evaluate the vascular access circuit and in-stent restenosis. The primary efficacy endpoint was target lesion primary patency at 1, 3, and 6 months. Secondary endpoints included access circuit primary patency and secondary patency at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from local or systemic serious adverse events through 30 days post-procedure. RESULTS: Forty-four patients had thrombosed access at the initial presentation, and 41 patients presented with recurrent stenosis. The target lesion primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 100%, 89.4%, and 74%, respectively. The access circuit primary patency rates were 100% at 1 month, 85% at 3 months, and 62.7% at 6 months. The secondary patency rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 100%, 96.4%, and 94.6%, respectively. In the adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, only recurrent lesions and female gender were associated with reduced primary patency rates. No serious adverse event was observed through the first 30 days post-procedure. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, a new covered stent was shown to be safe and effective for treating peripheral outflow stenosis in vascular access.

Impact of Sex Differences on the Outcomes of Coronary Invasive Physiological Assessment: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Brazilian Population.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; the sum of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates) according to interventional strategies guided by invasive physiological methods in both sexes in a Brazilian population during long-term follow-up for an average of 2 years. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 151 consecutive patients (232 lesions) between January 2018 and January 2022. The participants were divided into two groups: the female group (FG), comprising 59 patients with 88 lesions, and the male group (MG), comprising 92 patients with 144 lesions. Results: The FG had a greater mean age (FG: 67.96 ± 13.12 vs. MG: 62.36 ± 12.01 years, p = 0.009) and lower mean creatinine clearance (FG: 79.35 ± 38.63 vs. MG: 92.02 ± 38.62 mL/min, p = 0.02) than did the MG. The percentage of lesions in the left main coronary artery was higher in the FG than in the MG (12.5% vs. 2.78%, p = 0.006). The mean follow-up time was longer in the MG than in the FG (795.61 ± 350 vs. 619.19 ± 318 days, respectively; p = 0.001). MACE occurred in 11.86% and 13.04% of patients in the FG and MG, respectively (p = 0.850). Secondary outcomes, such as death, reinfarction, and the need for new revascularization, showed no significant between-sex differences. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the safety of invasive physiological methods to determine coronary revascularization in both male and female patients in a Brazilian population, as evidenced by the low rates of adverse cardiac events and death after a long-term follow-up.

Ureteral stent after PCNL: is leaving the threads through the percutaneous tract safe and better tolerated?

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, urinary symptoms, and feasibility of JJ stent removal with exteriorized threads through the percutaneous tract after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, transversal, comparative, experimental, randomized 1-to-1 cohort study in 52 patients who underwent "tubeless" PCNL from October 2020 to November 2022. Group A with threads through the urethra and Group B through the percutaneous tract. The validated USSQ (Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire) was applied in the Urology office a week after the procedure, and the JJ stent was withdrawn by pulling the threads. Hemoglobin and urine culture, and pre- and post-surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference in favor of group B when comparing urinary symptoms (p = 0.008), body pain (p = 0.009), and general condition (p = 0.042), mainly for non-urgency incontinence, frequency of analgesic use, and dysuria. There were significant differences between groups (p = 0.028, p = 0.026, p = 0.027, respectively). There is no association with urinary infections (p = 0.603) nor an increased risk of bleeding (p = 0.321). CONCLUSION: The removal of the JJ stent with exteriorized threads through the percutaneous tract after PCNL in the office is a feasible and safe procedure if it is removed before 8 days and has better tolerance regarding the urinary symptoms.

A Study of PLA Thin Film on SS 316L Coronary Stents Using a Dip Coating Technique.

The dip coating process is one of the recognized techniques used to generate polymeric coatings on stents in an easy and low-cost way. However, there is a lack of information about the influence of the process parameters of this technique on complex geometries such as stents. This paper studies the dip coating process parameters used to provide a uniform coating of PLA with a 4-10 µm thickness. A stainless-steel tube (AISI 316L) was laser-cut, electropolished, and dip-coated in a polylactic acid (PLA) solution whilst changing the process parameters. The samples were characterized to examine the coating's uniformity, thickness, surface roughness, weight, and chemical composition. FTIR and Raman investigations indicated the presence of PLA on the stent's surface, the chemical stability of PLA during the coating process, and the absence of residual chloroform in the coatings. Additionally, the water contact angle was measured to determine the hydrophilicity of the coating. Our results indicate that, when using entry and withdrawal speeds of 500 mm min-1 and a 15 s immersion time, a uniform coating thickness was achieved throughout the tube and in the stent with an average thickness of 7.8 µm.

Evaluating the efficacy of stent retriever and catheter aspiration combination in refractory cerebral venous sinus Thrombosis: A comprehensive Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, often associated with specific risk factors. The primary treatment for CVST is anticoagulation, but some cases progress to Refractory CVST (rCVST), requiring endovascular treatment. A combination of stent retriever and catheter aspiration is emerging as a promising technique to enhance treatment effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of this approach, aiming to improve recanalization success and neurological outcomes while reducing complications in rCVST patients. METHODS: A search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted across Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify studies on the use of stent retrievers and catheter aspiration for rCVST. Pooled analysis with 95 % confidence intervals was used to assess the effects. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used. Complete recanalization. good clinical outcomes (mRS ≤ 2), hemorrhagic, neurological, ischemic, and total complications, poor clinical outcomes (mRS > 2), and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of five retrospective studies involving 55 patients examined outcomes in CVST. The median mean age was 40 years. Complete recanalization rate: 36 % (95 % CI: 9 % to 62 %, I2 = 90 %). Good clinical outcomes: 72 % (95 % CI: 50 % to 94 %, I2 = 76 %). Hemorrhagic complications: 2 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 8 %, I2 = 15 %). Ischemic complications: 0 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 6 %, I2 = 0 %). Neurological complications: 7 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 14 %, I2 = 0 %). Poor clinical outcomes: 26 % (95 % CI: 6 % to 46 %, I2 = 70 %). Total complications: 6 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 15 %, I2 = 10 %). Mortality rate: 5 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 13 %, I2 = 19 %). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis scrutinized the efficacy of combining Stent Retriever and Catheter Aspiration for rCVST. Findings highlighted varied outcomes, including recanalization rates, complications, and mortality. The dichotomy between good and poor outcomes underscores the necessity for personalized therapeutic decisions. While offering a comprehensive overview, the study emphasizes literature heterogeneity, suggesting a need for more rigorous and standardized research to optimize therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Multilayer Stent for Emergency Treatment of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: A Case Report.

PURPOSE: We report the case of an acute type B dissection with high-risk features treated with multilayer stent. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with an acute type B aortic dissection. Conservative medical treatment did control blood pressure but did not alleviate her dissection symptoms. She was treated endovascularly with multilayer stents extensively covering the whole dissected area. HThe aortic arch side branches, visceral arteries and renal arteries remained patent after treatment. The recovery was uneventful, and she was discharged the day after the intervention. At 6- and 12-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, the true lumen volume increased and all side branches remained patent. CONCLUSION: We present a case of the use of a multilayer stent for acute type B aortic dissection. This technique allows to treat the whole dissection with low risk of paraplegia or side branch occlusion. Long-term results of ongoing clinical studies should confirm the place of the multilayer stent as a treatment option for type B aortic dissection.

Recanalization of portal vein thrombosis after pediatric liver transplantation: Efficacy and safety of the transsplenic access.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is challenging. Transsplenic access (TSA) is growing as an access option to the portal system but with higher rates of bleeding complications. The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transsplenic portal vein recanalization (PVR) using a metallic stent after pediatric liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 15 patients with chronic PVT who underwent PVR via TSA between February 2016 and December 2020. Two children who had undergone catheterization of a mesenteric vein tributary by minilaparotomy were excluded from the patency analysis but included in the splenic access analysis. The technical and clinical success of PVR and complications related to the procedure via TSA were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen children with PVT were treated primarily using the TSA. The mean age was 4.1 years (range, 1.5-13.7 years), and the most common clinical presentation was hypersplenism (60%). Technically successful PVR was performed in 11/13 (84.6%) children, and clinical success was achieved in 9/11 (81.8%) children. No major complications were observed, and one child presented moderate pain in the TSA (from a total of 17 TSA). The median follow-up was 48.2 months. The median primary patency was 9.9 months. Primary patency in the first 4 years was 75%, and primary assisted patency was 100% in the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Transsplenic PVR is a safe and effective method for the treatment of PVT after pediatric liver transplantation.