Tofacitinib for Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Case Report.

Purpose: At present, we have entered the era of using biological agents and small molecule targeted drugs to treat diseases. Although there have been many reports of biological agents treating pityriasis rubra pilaris recently, the clinical application of the JAK inhibitors in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris has been rarely reported, and there is a lack of evidence on the safety and efficacy of these drugs. We explore the use of the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with significant efficacy and no significant side effects, providing new ideas for the clinical treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris. Methods: We cover a case of pityriasis rubra pilaris treated with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib, which showed significant efficacy without any adverse effects. Results: This case report showed that the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib had significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris. We speculated that the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with the JAK inhibitors may be related to blocking the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, thereby blocking the high expression of cytokines IL-17, IL-12/IL-23, IL-23, TNF-α. Conclusion: The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib can become a new option for treating pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Renal Dysfunction in a Patient With Crohn's Disease During Ustekinumab Treatment: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ustekinumab is a first-line drug for Crohn's disease. However, little is known about its potential adverse effects on renal function. We present the case of a 42-year-old man with Crohn's disease who developed chronic renal dysfunction during ustekinumab treatment, which resolved after discontinuing ustekinumab. The findings underscore the importance of close monitoring of renal function in patients receiving ustekinumab, particularly those with preexisting kidney disease or risk factors for renal dysfunction.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Vedolizumab, Ustekinumab, and Tofacitinib After Induction and Maintenance for Ulcerative Colitis: Three Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited. METHODS: Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators. CONCLUSION: In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

Tocilizumab unfolds colo-protective and immunomodulatory effect in experimentally induced ulcerative colitis via mitigating autophagy and ER stress signaling.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic, relapsing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The pathophysiology of UC is complicated and involves several factors including immune, genetic, and environmental factors. Recently, a huge amount of research has concentrated on the role of interleukins including interleukin-6 (IL-6) in its pathophysiology. Thus, this study aims to examine the colo-protective and immunomodulatory effect of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in an experimental model of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced UC. In the current study, we analyzed the inflammatory, immunomodulatory, apoptotic, autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers and other clinical features including stool consistency, rectal bleeding, and edema markers in rats. Our results showed that induction of colitis caused bloody diarrhea and increased IL-6 levels. Treatment with TCZ significantly ameliorated DSS-induced injury via decreasing inflammatory markers of colon injury (IL-6), signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT-3), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Furthermore, TCZ attenuated the apoptotic marker (caspase-3), and down-regulated endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor proteins (inositol- requiring transmembrane kinase endonuclease-1 (IRE-1) and activated transcription factor-6 (ATF-6)) and autophagy proteins (autophagy-related 16-like protein 1 (ATG16L1) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein-2 (NOD2)), as compared to DSS group. Altogether, the current data suggest TCZ to be a promising protective therapy against UC.

How comparative studies can inform treatment decisions for Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing. AREAS COVERED: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. EXPERT OPINION: There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most 'sustainable' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

Real-World Long-Term Persistence and Surgical Procedure-Free Period Among Bio-naïve Patients with Crohn's Disease and Fistula Initiated on Ustekinumab.

INTRODUCTION: Fistula is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Treatment with biologics has been associated with fistula healing. Long-term persistence is an important factor for a chronic inflammatory process such as fistula. This study described 24-month persistence and time-to-surgery endpoints among bio-naïve patients with CD and intestinal fistula who were initiated on ustekinumab. METHODS: Adults with CD and any enteric or perianal fistula initiated on ustekinumab (index date) between September 23, 2016, and March 2, 2022, were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database and followed up to 24 months. Persistence on ustekinumab (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days) and composite endpoints of being persistent while on monotherapy and persistent while corticosteroid free were also assessed. The date of surgery was defined as the date of first claim for any CD-related surgeries. Persistence and time-to-surgery endpoints were assessed from the index date until the earliest of discontinuation (event), immunomodulator or other biologic use (event), corticosteroid use (event), date of surgery (event), 24-month follow-up or data end (censoring) using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The sample included 445 patients (mean age: 42.8 years; 56.6% female). The most common type of fistula was anal fistula (36.0%). At 24 months after ustekinumab initiation, 64.2% of patients remained persistent (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.8-71.4). Furthermore, 53.3% of patients were persistent while on monotherapy (95% CI 45.1-60.7), and 45.6% of patients were persistent while being corticosteroid free (95% CI 36.9-53.8). At 24 months, 22.8% (95% CI 17.0-30.3) of patients underwent any CD-related surgery. CONCLUSION: This study quantified long-term persistence on ustekinumab among bio-naïve patients with CD and fistula. Over half of patients initiated on ustekinumab were persistent and persistent while on monotherapy 24 months after initiation. Time-to-surgery estimate was comparable to existing evidence. These findings support ustekinumab as a treatment option for long-term management of CD with fistula.

Limited predictive value of the gut microbiome and metabolome for response to biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Emerging evidence suggests the gut microbiome's potential in predicting response to biologic treatments in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this prospective study, we aimed to predict treatment response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab, integrating clinical data, gut microbiome profiles based on metagenomic sequencing, and untargeted fecal metabolomics. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers and attempted to replicate microbiome-based signals from previous studies. We found that the predictive utility of the gut microbiome and fecal metabolites for treatment response was marginal compared to clinical features alone. Testing our identified microbial ratios in an external cohort reinforced the lack of predictive power of the microbiome. Additionally, we could not confirm previously published predictive signals observed in similar sized cohorts. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of external validation and larger sample sizes, to better understand the microbiome's impact on therapy outcomes in the setting of biologicals in IBD before potential clinical implementation.

Comparison of real-world healthcare resource utilization among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on ustekinumab or vedolizumab.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States. METHODS: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.

Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab.

INTRODUCTION: Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254). CONCLUSION: This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.

Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Background: The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population. Objectives: We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents. Design: This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data. Methods: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed. Results: In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed. Conclusion: In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

A narrative review of the literature: The role of biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Though there have been significant advancements in targeted therapies in skin diseases such as psoriasis or eczema, the progress in the treatment of vitiligo has been slow, with minimal studies assessing the effect of biologics, though there has been recent evidence of the effectiveness of JAK inhibition. This paper reviews the published case reports and studies for the use of systemic targeted therapies including biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF in Elderly Crohn's Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies are associated with increased infection risk among elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there are few data on the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in the elderly. METHODS: The study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in elderly Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Patients ≥60 years of age who commenced ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for CD were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort. The primary outcome was incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalization. Effectiveness was assessed by clinical remission, clinical response, and treatment persistence rates at 6 months. We adjusted for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and performed a logistic regression analysis to assess factors associated with serious infections, clinical remission, and treatment persistence. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients commencing ustekinumab and 124 commencing anti-TNF therapy were included. There was no difference in serious infection rates between anti-TNF agents (2.8%) and ustekinumab (3.1%) (P = .924) after propensity adjustment. Clinical remission rates were comparable at 6 months for ustekinumab (55.9%) and anti-TNF agents (52.4%) (P = .762). There was a significant reduction in HBI at 6 months in both groups. Treatment persistence was comparable between ustekinumab (90.6%) and anti-TNF agents (90.0%) at 6 months. Cox regression analysis did not show differences in treatment persistence (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.61; P = .594) and serious infection incidence (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-7.57; P = .709) by 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: We observed comparable safety and effectiveness for ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in treating elderly CD patients.

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we report equal safety and effectiveness for ustekinumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in treating older adults with Crohn's disease over a 6-month period.

One-year Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease: The K-STAR Study.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in Korean patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Adult patients with CD treated with UST were prospectively enrolled in the K-STAR (Post-MarKeting Surveillance for Crohn's Disease patients treated with STelARa) study between April 2018 and April 2022. Both the clinical effectiveness and adverse effects of UST therapy were analyzed. Missing data were handled using nonresponder imputation (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03942120). RESULTS: Of the 464 patients enrolled from 44 hospitals across Korea, 457 and 428 patients (Crohn's disease activity index ≥150) were included in the safety analysis and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. At weeks 16 to 20 after initiating UST, clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free remission rates were 75.0% (321 of 428), 64.0% (274 of 428), and 61.9% (265 of 428), respectively. At week 52 to 66, clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free remission rates were 62.4% (267 of 428), 52.6% (225 of 428), and 50.0% (214 of 428), respectively. Combined effectiveness (clinical response + biochemical response) was achieved in 40.0% (171 of 428) and 41.6% (178 of 428) at week 16 to 20 and week 52 to 66, respectively. Biologic-naïve patients exhibited significantly higher rates of combined effectiveness than biologic-experienced patients (50.3% vs 30.7% at week 16-20, P < .001; 47.7% vs 36.0% at week 52-66, P = .014). No additional benefits were observed with the concomitant use of immunomodulators. Ileal location was independently associated with a higher probability of clinical remission compared with colonic or ileocolonic location at week 52 to 66. Adverse and serious adverse events were observed in 28.2% (129 of 457) and 12.7% (58 of 457), respectively, with no new safety signal associated with UST treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab was well-tolerated, effective, and safe as induction and maintenance therapy for CD in Korea.

Ustekinumab was well-tolerated and safe for Koran patients with Crohn's disease with no new safety signal as induction and maintenance therapy. Biologic-naïve patients exhibited better effectiveness outcomes, whereas combination therapy with immunomodulators was not superior to ustekinumab monotherapy.

Megaconial congenital muscular dystrophy: Importance of cutaneous features and successful response to ustekinumab.

Megaconial congenital muscular dystrophy (MCMD) is a rare autosomal-recessive multisystem disorder characterized by delayed motor development, intellectual disability, and skin involvement. We report a patient with MCMD who had diffuse ichthyosis-like scaling, and successfully responded to ustekinumab.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess the relative efficacy at 52 weeks (Wk52) of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or who had a previous inadequate response or an intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR). METHODS: Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from the bimekizumab trials BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data on patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 1 trial (NCT01009086; 45 mg, N = 205; 90 mg; N = 204) and a subgroup of TNFi-IR patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 2 trial (NCT01077362; 45 mg, N = 60; 90 mg, N = 58), respectively. Patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of the ustekinumab trial patients. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Non-placebo-adjusted comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and ustekinumab outcomes for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria (non-responder imputation) were analyzed. RESULTS: In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 45 mg: 2.14 [1.35, 3.40]; 90 mg: 1.98 [1.24, 3.16]), ACR50 (45 mg: 2.74 [1.75, 4.29]; 90 mg: 2.29 [1.48, 3.55]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 3.33 [2.04, 5.46]; 90 mg: 3.05 [1.89, 4.91]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (45 mg: 4.17 [2.13, 8.16]; 90 mg: 4.19 [2.07, 8.49]), ACR50 (45 mg: 5.00 [2.26, 11.05]; 90 mg: 3.86 [1.70, 8.79]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 9.85 [2.79, 34.79]; 90 mg: 6.29 [1.98, 20.04]). CONCLUSIONS: Using MAIC, bimekizumab showed greater efficacy than ustekinumab in achieving all ACR responses in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT01009086, NCT01077362.

Factors Associated with Delays in Initiating Biologic Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Expeditious initiation of biologic therapy is important in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, initiation of biologics in the outpatient setting may be delayed by various clinical, social, and financial variables. AIM: To evaluate the delay in initiation of an advanced therapy in IBD and to identify factors that contributed to this delay. METHODS: This was a multi-center retrospective study. Outpatients who were initiated on a biologic therapy from 3/1/2019 to 9/30/20 were eligible for the study. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with a delay in biologic treatment initiation. Delay was defined as the days from decision date (prescription placement) to first infusion or delivery of medication. RESULTS: In total 411 patients (Crohn's disease, n = 276; ulcerative colitis, n = 129) were included in the analysis. The median [interquartile range-(IQR)] delay for all drugs was 20 [12-37] days (infliximab, 19 [13-33] days; adalimumab, 10 [5-26] days; vedolizumab, 21 [14-42] days; and ustekinumab, 21 [14-42] days). Multivariate linear regression analysis identified that the most important variables associated with delays in biologic treatment initiation was self-identification as Black, longer distance from treatment site, and lack of initial insurance coverage approval. CONCLUSION: There may be a significant delay in biologic treatment initiation in patients with IBD. The most important variables associated with this delay included self-identification as Black, longer distance from site, and lack of initial insurance coverage approval.

Successful Treatment of Rituximab-Induced Crohn's Disease With Ustekinumab.

Autoimmune optic papillitis is a rare disorder that causes progressive visual loss, often treated with rituximab (RTX). However, its use is not without risks. Here, we present a 51-year-old man who experienced vision loss because of autoimmune optic papillitis, which was well-controlled with RTX. Four years later, the patient developed abdominal pain and diarrhea and was found to have RTX-induced Crohn's disease (CD). The patient failed treatment with azathioprine, but was subsequently able to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission of his CD with ustekinumab, while continuing RTX therapy for autoimmune optic papillitis. This case report describes the efficacy of the anti-interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody in inducing remission of RTX-induced CD.

Single-cell analysis of Crohn's disease: Unveiling heterogeneity and evaluating ustekinumab outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to dissect the cellular complexity of Crohn's disease (CD) using single-cell RNA sequencing, focusing on identifying key cell populations and their transcriptional profiles in inflamed tissue. METHODS: We applied scRNA-sequencing to compare the cellular composition of CD patients with healthy controls, utilizing Seurat for clustering and annotation. Differential gene expression analysis and protein-protein interaction networks were constructed to identify crucial genes and pathways. RESULTS: Our study identified eight distinct cell types in CD, highlighting crucial fibroblast and T cell interactions. The analysis revealed key cellular communications and identified significant genes and pathways involved in the disease's pathology. The role of fibroblasts was underscored by elevated expression in diseased samples, offering insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets, including responses to ustekinumab treatment, thus enriching our understanding of CD at a molecular level. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the complex cellular and molecular interplay in CD, suggesting new biomarkers and therapeutic targets, offering insights into disease mechanisms and treatment implications.

Hidradenocarcinoma in a Crohn's patient on ustekinumab: A case report.

Hidradenocarcinoma is a locally aggressive malignancy of the sweat glands, most commonly found on the head, neck, and upper body. Although rare, it has been seen in patients with hidradenitis supparativa, who have an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancers. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent used to treat inflammatory bowel disease, has been associated with development of cancer in some patients. We present a case of a 36-year-old female with hidradenitis supparativa and Crohn's disease who developed hidradenocarcinoma in setting of ustekinumab use, demonstrating the need for further study of the relationship between biologic therapy and malignancy.