Hospital- and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia early after Lung Transplantation: a prospective Study on Incidence, Pathogen Origin and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Hospital- (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors and outcomes are not well reported. METHODS: LT recipients transplanted at our institution (07/2019-01/2020 and 10/2021-11/2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. In addition, we evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field-gel-electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR 7-13). 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE.Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR 4.42, 95% CI 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia.Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR 5.44, 95% CI 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR 4.31, 95% CI: 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplant; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in around 10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.

Oral Care and Positioning to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common nosocomial infections in critical patients. The negative impacts of VAP on patient outcomes emphasize the importance of effective preventive measures such as oral care and patient positioning. The aim of this review was to investigate the impact of oral care and positioning on the prevention of VAP among patients in the intensive care unit. Methods: This review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results: In total 13 studies were included, all of them were randomized controlled trials. Six out of nine studies about oral care have significant results on VAP incidence. Regarding the position, Patients positioned at a 45-degree were less likely to develop VAP than those positioned at a 30-degree and those in a supine position. Conclusion: Although patients positioned at 45-degree angle were less likely to develop VAP than those at 30-degree, it is necessary to individualize this practice before recommending it, once there are some contraindications, such as neurocritical patients. Regarding oral care to prevent VAP, considering the current guidelines' recommendation not to use oral chlorexidine, further studies evaluating alternatives are needed.

Effect of different sedatives on the prognosis of patients with mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV database.

Aim: To compare the effects of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine monotherapy and combination therapy on the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: 11,491 participants from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database 2008-2019 was included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was defined as incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in-hospital mortality, and duration of MV. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the association between sedation and the incidence of VAP. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between sedative therapy and in-hospital mortality. Additionally, univariate and multivariate linear analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between sedation and duration of MV. Results: Compared to patients not receiving these medications, propofol alone, dexmedetomidine alone, combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine, combination of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine were all association with an increased risk of VAP; dexmedetomidine alone, combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine, combination of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine may be protective factor for in-hospital mortality, while propofol alone was risk factor. There was a positive correlation between all types of tranquilizers and the duration of MV. Taking dexmedetomidine alone as the reference, all other drug groups were found to be associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. The administration of propofol alone, in combination with midazolam and dexmedetomidine, in combination with propofol and dexmedetomidine, in combination with midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine were associated with an increased risk of VAP compared to the use of dexmedetomidine alone. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine alone may present as a favorable prognostic option for ICU patients with mechanical ventilation MV.

The ReInvigorate Study-phrenic nerve-to-diaphragm stimulation for weaning from mechanical ventilation: a protocol for a randomized pivotal clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In the United States in 2017, there were an estimated 903,745 hospitalizations involving mechanical ventilation (MV). Complications from ventilation can result in longer hospital stays, increased risk of disability, and increased healthcare costs. It has been hypothesized that electrically pacing the diaphragm by phrenic nerve stimulation during mechanical ventilation may minimize or reverse diaphragm dysfunction, resulting in faster weaning. METHODS: The ReInvigorate Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Stimdia's pdSTIM System for facilitating weaning from MV. The pdSTIM system employs percutaneously placed multipolar electrodes to stimulate the cervical phrenic nerves and activate contraction of the diaphragm bilaterally. Patients who were on mechanical ventilation for at least 96 h and who failed at least one weaning attempt were considered for enrollment in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (treatment vs. control). Secondary endpoints will include the rapid shallow breathing index and other physiological and system characteristics. Safety will be summarized for both primary and additional analyses. All endpoints will be evaluated at 30 days or at the time of removal of mechanical ventilation, whichever is first. DISCUSSION: This pivotal study is being conducted under an investigational device exception with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The technology being studied could provide a first-of-kind therapy for difficult-to-wean patients on mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05998018 , registered August 2023.

Positive end-expiratory pressure management in patients with severe ARDS: implications of prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

The optimal strategy for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in the management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients remains unclear. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of a careful risk-benefit assessment for PEEP titration in terms of cardiopulmonary function in these patients. Over the last few decades, the primary goal of PEEP usage has shifted from merely improving oxygenation to emphasizing lung protection, with a growing focus on the individual pattern of lung injury, lung and chest wall mechanics, and the hemodynamic consequences of PEEP. In moderate-to-severe ARDS patients, prone positioning (PP) is recommended as part of a lung protective ventilation strategy to reduce mortality. However, the physiologic changes in respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics during PP may require careful re-assessment of the ventilation strategy, including PEEP. For the most severe ARDS patients with refractory gas exchange impairment, where lung protective ventilation is not possible, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) facilitates gas exchange and allows for a "lung rest" strategy using "ultraprotective" ventilation. Consequently, the importance of lung recruitment to improve oxygenation and homogenize ventilation with adequate PEEP may differ in severe ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO compared to those managed conservatively. This review discusses PEEP management in severe ARDS patients and the implications of management with PP or V-V ECMO with respect to respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic function.

Ventilator-Associated Events Cost in ICU Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Multi-State Model.

Introduction: Cost analysis is complicated by the fact that patients acquire infections during their hospital stay, having already spent time at risk without having an infection. Multi-state models (MSM) accounts for this time at risk treating infections as time-dependent exposures from ICU admission. Aim of the study: To estimate ventilator-associated events (VAEs) direct additional cost in ICU patients. Material and Methods: This was a prospective, observational study carried out for a two-year period in four medical-surgical ICUs of Athens, Greece. The sample consisted of adult patients who received mechanical ventilation for ≥4 days and were followed until discharge from the ICU or until death. CDC standard definitions were used to diagnose VAEs. To estimate VAEs additional length of stay (LOS), we used a four-state model that accounted for the time of VAEs. The direct hospital cost was calculated, consisting of the fixed and variable cost. The direct additional cost per VAEs episode was calculated by multiplying VAEs extra LOS by cost per day of ICU hospitalization. Results: In the final analysis were included 378 patients with 9,369 patient-days. The majority of patients were male (58.7%) with a median age of 60 years. Of 378 patients 143 (37.8%) developed 143 episodes of VAEs. VAEs crude additional LOS was 17 days, while VAE mean additional LOS after applying MSM was 6.55±1.78 days. The direct cost per day of ICU hospitalization was € 492.80. The direct additional cost per VAEs episode was € 3,227.84, € 885.56 the fixed and € 2,342.28 the variable cost. Antibiotic cost was € 1,570.95 per VAEs episode. The total direct additional cost for the two-year period was € 461,581.12. Conclusions: These results confirm the importance of estimating VAEs real cost using micro-costing for analytical cost allocation, and MSM to avoid additional LOS and cost overestimation.

Physicians' decision making when weaning patients from mechanical ventilation: A qualitative content analysis.

BACKGROUND: Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a complex and central intensive care process. This complexity indicates that the challenges of weaning must be explored from different perspectives. Furthermore, physicians' experiences and the factors influencing their decision-making regarding weaning are unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore and describe the factors influencing physicians' decision-making when weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: This qualitative study used an exploratory and descriptive design with qualitative content analysis. Sixteen physicians from five ICUs across Sweden were purposively included and interviewed regarding their weaning experiences. FINDINGS: The physicians expressed that prioritising the patient's well-being was evident, and there was agreement that both the physical and mental condition of the patient had a substantial impact on decision-making. Furthermore, there was a lack of agreement on whether patients should be involved in the weaning process and how their resources, needs, and wishes should be included in decision-making. In addition, there were factors not directly linked to the patient but which still influenced decision-making, such as the available resources and teamwork. Sometimes, it was difficult to point out the basis for decisions; in that decisions were made by gut feeling, intuition, or clinical experience. CONCLUSION: Physicians' decision-making regarding weaning was a dynamic process influenced by several factors. These factors were related to the patient's condition and the structure for weaning. Increased understanding of weaning from the physicians' and ICU teams' perspectives may improve the weaning process by broadening the knowledge about the aspects influencing the decision-making.

Key summary of German national guideline for adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia- Update 2024 Funding number at the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA): 01VSF22007.

PURPOSE: This executive summary of a German national guideline aims to provide the most relevant evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS: The guideline made use of a systematic assessment and decision process using evidence to decision framework (GRADE). Recommendations were consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation was supported by the German innovation fund providing extensive literature searches and (meta-) analyses by an independent methodologist. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations are presented including the quality of evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation. RESULTS: The original guideline contains 26 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with nosocomial pneumonia, thirteen of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while the other 13 represent consensus expert opinion. For this key summary, we present 11 most relevant for everyday clinical practice key recommendations with evidence overview and rationale, of which two are expert consensus and 9 evidence-based (4 strong, 5 weak and 2 open recommendations). For the management of nosocomial pneumonia patients should be divided in those with and without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) should not be used routinely. Bronchoscopic diagnosis is not considered superior to´non-bronchoscopic sampling in terms of main outcomes. Only patients with septic shock and the presence of an additional risk factor for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP) should receive empiric combination therapy. In clinically stabilized patients, antibiotic therapy should be de-escalated and focused. In critically ill patients, prolonged application of suitable beta-lactam antibiotics should be preferred. Therapy duration is suggested for 7-8 days. Procalcitonin (PCT) based algorithm might be used to shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment. Patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Diagnostics for Aspergillus should be performed with an antigen test from bronchial lavage fluid. CONCLUSION: The current guideline focuses on German epidemiology and standards of care. It should be a guide for the current treatment and management of nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.

Risk factors analysis of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in inpatients with overlapping syndrome of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical data of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea overlap syndrome (OS) during hospitalization and to evaluate the risk factors of patients treated with Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV). METHODS: Demographic and clinical data of patients with confirmed OS during hospitalization were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether noninvasive ventilator was used during hospitalization, including OS treated with NIV (244 cases) and OS without NIV (239 cases). The t-test, χ 2 test, and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to compare the two groups, and multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of NIV in patients with OS. RESULTS: Compared with the OS group without NIV, the pulmonary hypertension, lymphocyte count, and left ventricular ejection fraction% of OS patients with NIV were lower, whereas PCO2, uric acid, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were higher, with statistical differences (P < 0.05). During hospitalization and follow-up, OS patients with NIV had a longer hospital stay (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in the rate of readmission within 28 days. The logistic regression analysis showed that the history of diuretic use, previous history of noninvasive ventilator use, and ischemic heart disease were independent risk factors for NIV treatment in OS patients during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Patients with OS undergoing NIV during hospitalization exhibited more severe overall illness and had prolonged hospital stays compared to OS patients not receiving NIV. History of diuretic use, history of NIV use, and ischemic heart disease are independent risk factors for NIV treatment in OS patients during hospitalization.

Compassionate Ventilator Release in Patients With Neuromuscular Disease: A Two-Case Comparison.

Dyspnea, the subjective sensation of breathlessness, is a distressing and potentially traumatic symptom. Dyspnea associated with mechanical ventilation may contribute to intensive care unit (ICU) associated post-traumatic stress disorder and impaired quality of life. Dyspnea is both difficult to alleviate and a cause of significant distress to patients, their loved ones, and care providers People living with neuromuscular disease, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or myasthenia gravis (MG), often rely on a ventilator at late stages of illness due to complications of progressive respiratory muscle weakness and paralysis. When unable to wean from the ventilator, conversations turn towards goals of care and release from the ventilator for comfort and end of life (EOL). Patients with and without neuromuscular disease have high risk for dyspnea at EOL upon ventilator liberation. Although limited recommendations have been published specific to patients with ALS, no guidelines currently exist for the terminal liberation from mechanical ventilation in patients experiencing respiratory muscle insufficiency from a neuromuscular disease. Further research on this topic is needed, including creation of a protocol for ventilator release in patients with neuromuscular disease. The following case reports detail the dissimilar EOL experiences of two patients with different forms of neuromuscular disease.

Preventability of Hospital Deaths in Patients with Non-Ventilator Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Crude and adjusted mortality rates for patients with non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) are amongst the highest of all healthcare-associated infections, leading to calls for greater prevention. Patients prone to NV-HAP, however, tend to be severely ill at baseline making it unclear whether their high mortality rates are due to NV-HAP, underlying conditions, or both. METHODS: Two infectious disease physicians conducted detailed medical record reviews on 150 randomly selected adults from 4 hospitals who died in-hospital following an NV-HAP event between April 2016 and May 2021. Reviewers abstracted risk factors, estimated the preventability of NV-HAP, identified causes of death, and adjudicated the preventability of death. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 69.3 (IQR 60.7-77.4) and 43.3% were female. Comorbidities were common: 57% had cancer, 30% chronic kidney disease, 29% chronic lung disease, and 27% heart failure. At least one hospice-eligible condition was present before NV-HAP in 54% and "Do Not Resuscitate" orders in 24%. Most (99%) had difficult-to-modify NV-HAP risk factors: 76% altered mental status, 35% dysphagia, and 27% nasogastric/orogastric tubes. NV-HAP was deemed possibly or probably preventable in 21% and hospital death likely or very likely preventable in 8.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who die following NV-HAP have multiple, severe underlying comorbidities and difficult-to-modify risk factors for NV-HAP. Only 1 in 5 NV-HAPs that culminated in death and 1 in 12 deaths following NV-HAP were judged potentially preventable. This does not diminish the importance of NV-HAP prevention programs but informs expectations about the potential magnitude of their impact on hospital deaths.

Variations and National Perspectives on Evaluation and Management of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An In-Depth Survey Analysis.

Introduction Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are vulnerable to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which increases their morbidity and mortality. There is a significant overlap of clinical features of neonatal VAP with other pulmonary pathologies, particularly in preterm infants, which can make the definitive diagnosis and management of VAP challenging. Objective Our study surveyed NICU providers across the United States to understand the perspectives and variations in neonatal VAP diagnostic and management practices. Methods The REDCap survey was distributed to the actively practicing members of the Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (SoNPM) of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data from the respondents. Results Of 254 respondents, the majority (86.6%, 220) were neonatologists and had a relatively even geographical distribution. Most (75.9%, 193) stated that they would perform a gram stain and respiratory culture as part of a sepsis workup irrespective of the patient's duration on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV); 224 (88.2%) of providers preferred the endotracheal aspiration (ETA) technique to collect specimens. In cases where a positive respiratory culture was present, VAP (52.4%, 133) was the predominantly assigned diagnosis, followed by pneumonia (27.2%, 69) and ventilator-associated tracheitis (VAT) (9.8%, 25). Respondents reported a prescription of intravenous gentamicin (70%, 178) and vancomycin (41%, 105) as the initial empiric antibiotic drugs, pending final respiratory culture results. Most respondents (55.5%, 141) opted for seven days of antibiotics duration to treat VAP. The reported intra-departmental variation among colleagues in acquiring respiratory cultures and prescribing antibiotics for VAP was 48.8% (124) and 37.4% (95), respectively, with slightly more than half (53.5%, 136) of providers reporting having VAP prevention guidelines in their units. Conclusion The survey study revealed inconsistencies in the investigation, diagnostic nomenclature, choice of antibiotic, and treatment duration for neonatal VAP. Consequently, there is a pressing need for further research to establish a clear definition and evidence-based criteria for VAP.

Remimazolam Alleviates Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury by Activating TSPO to Inhibit Macrophage Pyroptosis.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages are activated in ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), accompanied by macrophage pyroptosis. Remimazolam (Re) plays a role in inhibiting macrophage activation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mechanism of Re in VILI. METHODS: A VILI model (20 mL/kg mechanical ventilation) was created using C57BL/6 mice. Alveolar macrophages were isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and received mechanical stretching to simulate the mechanical ventilation in vitro. VILI model mice were treated with Re (16 mg/kg) to assess the alveolar structure, wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio, endothelial barrier antigen (EBA) permeability index, BALF protein content, inflammatory factors, macrophage pyroptosis, pyroptosis-related factors, and translocator protein (TSPO) level using a series of biological experiments. Whether Re alleviated macrophage pyroptosis by regulating TSPO was determined by rescue experiments. RESULTS: Re alleviated VILI, as evidenced by improvement of abnormal morphology of lung tissues during VILI and decreases in the lung W/D weight ratio, lung EBA permeability index, and BALF protein content. Re attenuated pulmonary inflammation and macrophage pyroptosis during VILI via down-regulation of inflammatory factors (myeloperoxidase, malondialchehyche, 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, interleukin-1ß, and interleukin-18), and pyroptosis factors (cleaved gasdermin D (GSDMD)/GSDMD value, NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3), and caspase-1). Re activated TSPO in macrophages. TSPO overexpression rescued the cell stretch-inhibited macrophage viability and cell stretch-induced macrophage pyroptosis. CONCLUSION: Re alleviates VILI by activating TSPO to inhibit macrophage pyroptosis.

Prior carbapenem exposure increases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically Ill children.

BACKGROUND: Prior antibiotic exposure has been identified as a risk factor for VAP occurrence, making it a growing concern among clinical practitioners. But there is a lack of systematic research on the types of antibiotics and the duration of exposure that influence VAP occurrence in children at current. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 278 children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) between January 2020 and December 2022. Of these, 171 patients with MV duration ≥ 48 h were included in the study, with 61 of them developing VAP (VAP group) and the remaining 110 as the non-VAP group. We analyzed the relationship between early antibiotic exposure and VAP occurrence. RESULTS: The incidence of VAP was 21.94% (61/278). The VAP group had significantly longer length of hospital stay (32.00 vs. 20.00 days, p<0.001), PICU stay(25.00 vs. 10.00 days, p<0.001), and duration of mechanical ventilation(16.00 vs. 6.00 days, p<0.001) compared to the non-VAP group. The mortality in the VAP group was significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group (36.07% vs. 21.82%, p = 0.044). The VAP group had a significantly higher rate of carbapenem exposure (65.57% vs. 41.82%, p = 0.003) and duration of usage (9.00 vs. 5.00 days, p = 0.004) than the non-VAP group. Vancomycin and/or linezolid exposure rates (57.38% vs. 40.00%, p = 0.029) and duration (8 vs. 4.5 days, p = 0.010) in the VAP group were significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group, either. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the use of carbapenem (≥ 7 days) (OR = 5.156, 95% CI: 1.881-14.137, p = 0.001), repeated intubation (OR = 3.575, 95% CI: 1.449-8.823, p = 0.006), and tracheostomy (OR = 5.767, 95% CI:1.686-19.729, p = 0.005) as the independent risk factors for the occurrence of VAP, while early intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was a protective factor against VAP (OR = 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185-0.98, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Prior carbapenem exposure (more than 7 days) was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of VAP. For critically ill children, reducing carbapenem use and duration as much as possible should be considered.

Role of bronchoscopy in the management of patients with suspected or suffering from ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis.

Background: The utility of bronchoscopy in the treatment of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has been proposed, although prior research has yielded inconclusive findings. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine the impact of bronchoscopy on mortality rates, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) among patients with VAP. Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were acquired by conducting a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. To account for the potential heterogeneity, a random-effects model was utilized to combine the findings and incorporate its potential influence. Results: Eight RCTs and three cohort studies, including 3907 patients with highly suspected or clinically diagnosed VAP, were included. Compared to the controls, bronchoscopy use was not associated with a significant effect on all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.81, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 1.05, p = 0.12; I2 = 57 %). Subgroup analysis showed that bronchoscopy used for the microbiological diagnosis of VAP was not associated with reduced mortality (RR: 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.75 to 1.13), while therapeutic bronchoscopy use was associated with significantly reduced mortality (RR: 0.53, 95 % CI: 0.35 to 0.81). The duration of MV or length of ICU stay was not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Bronchoscopy use for the purpose of the microbiological diagnosis of VAP did not reduce short-term mortality compared to diagnosis without bronchoscopy use, while therapeutic bronchoscopy use was associated with reduced mortality in these patients.

Effect of different mouthwashes on ventilator-related outcomes and mortality in intensive care unit patients: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a common and life-threatening complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Maintaining oral hygiene is crucial for reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence. Various mouthwash solutions are used for oral care in ICU settings, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of commonly used mouthwashes for oral care in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing saline, chlorhexidine, sodium bicarbonate, oxidising agents, herbal extracts, and povidone-iodine for oral care in ventilated ICU patients. Outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence, ICU mortality, duration of ventilation, and Escherichia coli fixed value. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to synthesise direct and indirect evidence. This study is registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, 2023120028. RESULTS: FourteenRCTs with 1644 participants were included. Oxidising agents showed a trend towards reducing the incidence of VAP compared to the control group (risk ratio: 0.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-1.10). Administration of saline was associated with a notable reduction in ICU mortality (risk ratio: 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.88) versus no mouthwash. No significant differences were observed in the duration of mechanical ventilation between chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial mouthwashes, especially chlorhexidine, pose potential risks in ICU patients; oxidising solutions demonstrate relative safety. Saline solution emerges as a promising alternative, associated with a significant reduction in mortality rates. However, the need for large, high-quality RCTs remains paramount to substantiate these findings and establish evidence-based oral-care protocols in ICU settings. REGISTRATION: This study is registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, 2023120028.

Implementation of a structured oral hygiene program through nursing assistant education to address non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia: A quasi-experimental study.

INTRODUCTION: Non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV HAP) is a common complication for hospitalized patients. NV HAP develops when patients aspirate oral secretions containing pathogenic bacteria. Appropriate oral hygiene can help mitigate NV HAP development. Hospital staff, including nursing assistants, play an important role in ensuring that these cares are completed. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to evaluate outcomes before and after implementation of a structured oral hygiene education program. METHODS: A structured oral hygiene program was developed and implemented in a large quaternary hospital. Change in NA knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors before and after implementation of the oral hygiene program was evaluated. Retrospective patient outcomes before and after the intervention were analyzed to detect changes in NV HAP rates. RESULTS: Following the education, nursing assistant knowledge of recommended frequency of oral care for patients who are NPO increased (67.2% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.003). NAs were more likely to report oral hygiene tools including oral suctioning (80.8% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.005) and toothbrushes (89.3% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.031). The unadjusted incidence of NV HAP was significantly lower in the post-intervention cohort (0.25%) compared to the pre-intervention cohort (0.74%), p < 0.001. In the adjusted model, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation increased the odds of NV HAP by nearly sevenfold (AOR = 6.88, 95% CI: 3.99, 11.39). CONCLUSION: Focused education for NAs is an effective strategy to increase knowledge related to oral hygiene. Implementing a structured oral hygiene program for NAs appears to be a promising practice to decrease NV HAP.

[Nosocomial pneumonia]. / Nosokomiale Pneumonie.

Nosocomial pneumonia is defined as pneumonia occurring ≥ 48 h after hospital admission in a patient without severe immunosuppression. It can occur in spontaneously breathing patients or with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanically ventilated patients. In patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (semi)quantitative cultures of tracheobronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid should be perfomed. The initial empirical antimicrobial treatment is determined by the risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP). The advantage of combination treatment increases with the prevalence of MDRPs. The antibiotic treatment should be adapted when the microbiological results are available. After 72 h a standardized re-evaluation including the response to treatment and also checking of the suspected diagnosis of pneumonia in a structured form is mandatory. Treatment failure can occur as a primary or secondary failure and in the case of primary progression necessitates another comprehensive diagnostic work-up before any further antibiotic treatment.

Modes of administration of nitric oxide devices and ventilators flow-by impact the delivery of pre-determined concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) is a strong vasodilator, selectively directed on pulmonary circulation through inhaled administration. In adult intensive care units (ICU), it is mainly used for refractory hypoxemia in mechanically ventilated patients. Several medical delivery devices have been developed to deliver inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). The main purpose of those devices is to guarantee an accurate inspiratory NO concentration, whatever the ventilator used, with NO2 concentrations lower than 0.3 ppm. We hypothesized that the performances of the different available iNO delivery systems could depend on their working principle and could be influenced by the ventilator settings. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of seven different iNO-devices combined with different ICU ventilators' flow-by to reach inspiratory NO concentration targets and to evaluate their potential risk of toxicity. METHODS: We tested seven iNO-devices on a test-lung connected to distinct ICU ventilators offering four different levels of flow-by. We measured the flow in the inspiratory limb of the patient circuit and the airway pressure. The nitric oxide/nitrogen (NO/N2) flow was measured on the administration line of the iNO-devices. NO and NO2 concentrations were measured in the test-lung using an electrochemical analyzer. RESULTS: We identified three iNO-device generations based on the way they deliver NO flow: "Continuous", "Sequential to inspiratory phase" (I-Sequential) and "Proportional to inspiratory and expiratory ventilator flow" (Proportional). Median accuracy of iNO concentration measured in the test lung was 2% (interquartile range, IQR -19; 36), -23% (IQR -29; -17) and 0% (IQR -2; 0) with Continuous, I-Sequential and Proportional devices, respectively. Increased ventilator flow-by resulted in decreased iNO concentration in the test-lung with Continuous and I-Sequential devices, but not with Proportional ones. NO2 formation measured to assess potential risks of toxicity never exceeded the predefined safety target of 0.5 ppm. However, NO2 concentrations higher than or equal to 0.3 ppm, a concentration that can cause bronchoconstriction, were observed in 19% of the different configurations. CONCLUSION: We identified three different generations of iNO-devices, based on their gas administration modalities, that were associated with highly variable iNO concentrations' accuracy. Ventilator's flow by significantly impacted iNO concentration. Only the Proportional devices permitted to accurately deliver iNO whatever the conditions and the ventilators tested.