ANXA1 Promotes Tumor Immune Evasion by Binding PARP1 and Upregulating Stat3-Induced Expression of PD-L1 in Multiple Cancers.

The deregulation of Annexin A1 (ANXA1), a regulator of inflammation and immunity, leads to cancer growth and metastasis. However, whether ANXA1 is involved in cancer immunosuppression is still unclear. Here, we report that ANXA1 knockdown (i) dramatically downregulates programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma cells; (ii) promotes T cell-mediated killing of cancer cells in vitro; and (iii) inhibits cancer immune escape in immune-competent mice via downregulating PD-L1 expression and increasing the number and killing activity of CD8+ T cells. Mechanistically, ANXA1 functioned as a sponge molecule for interaction of PARP1 and Stat3. Specifically, binding of ANXA1 to PARP1 decreased PARP1's binding to Stat3, which reduced poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and dephosphorylation of Stat3 and thus, increased Stat3's transcriptional activity, leading to transcriptionally upregulated expression of PD-L1 in multiple cancer cells. In clinical samples, expression of ANXA1 and PD-L1 was significantly higher in breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and skin cutaneous melanoma compared with corresponding normal tissues and positively correlated in cancer tissues. Moreover, using both ANXA1 and PD-L1 proteins for predicting efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and patient prognosis was superior to using individual proteins. Our data suggest that ANXA1 promotes cancer immune escape via binding PARP1 and upregulating Stat3-induced expression of PD-L1, that ANXA1 is a potential new target for cancer immunotherapy, and combination of ANXA1 and PD-L1 expression is a potential marker for predicting efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in multiple cancers.

Resolution Pharmacology: Focus on Pro-Resolving Annexin A1 and Lipid Mediators for Therapeutic Innovation in Inflammation.

Chronic diseases that affect our society are made more complex by comorbidities and are poorly managed by the current pharmacology. While all present inflammatory etiopathogeneses, there is an unmet need for better clinical management of these diseases and their multiple symptoms. We discuss here an innovative approach based on the biology of the resolution of inflammation. Studying endogenous pro-resolving peptide and lipid mediators, how they are formed, and which target they interact with, can offer innovative options through augmenting the expression or function of pro-resolving pathways or mimicking their actions with novel targeted molecules. In all cases, resolution offers innovation for the treatment of the primary cause of a given disease and/or for the management of its comorbidities, ultimately improving patient quality of life. By implementing resolution pharmacology, we harness the whole physiology of inflammation, with the potential to bring a marked change in the management of inflammatory conditions.

Annexin A1 (Ac2-26)-dependent Fpr2 receptor alleviates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by inhibiting inflammation and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: Excessive inflammatory responses and apoptosis are critical pathologies that contribute to sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SI-AKI). Annexin A1 (ANXA1), a member of the calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding protein family, protects against SI-AKI through its anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects, but the underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown. METHODS: In vivo, SI-AKI mouse models were established via caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and were then treated with the Ac2-26 peptide of ANXA1 (ANXA1 (Ac2-26)), WRW4 (Fpr2 antagonist) or both. In vitro, HK-2 cells were induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and then treated with ANXA1 (Ac2-26), Fpr2-siRNA or both. RESULTS: In the present study, we found that the expression levels of ANXA1 were decreased, and the expression levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-8 and Bax were significantly increased, accompanied by marked kidney tissue apoptosis in vivo. Moreover, we observed that ANXA1 (Ac2-26) significantly reduced the levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6 and cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-8, FADD and Bax and inhibited apoptosis in kidney tissue and HK-2 cells, accompanied by pathological damage to kidney tissue. Seven-day survival, kidney function and cell viability were significantly improved in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Furthermore, the administration of ANXA1 (Ac2-26) inhibited the CLP- or LPS-induced phosphorylation of PI3K and AKT and downregulated the level of NF-κB in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, our data demonstrate that blocking the Fpr2 receptor by the administration of WRW4 or Fpr2-siRNA reversed the abovementioned regulatory role of ANXA1, accompanied by enhanced phosphorylation of PI3K and AKT and upregulation of the level of NF-κB in vivo and in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, this study provides evidence that the protective effect of ANXA1 (Ac2-26) on SI-AKI largely depends on the negative regulation of inflammation and apoptosis via the Fpr2 receptor.

Pro-resolving therapies as potential adjunct treatment for infectious diseases: Evidence from studies with annexin A1 and angiotensin-(1-7).

Infectious diseases, once believed to be an eradicable public health threat, still represent a leading cause of death worldwide. Environmental and social changes continuously favor the emergence of new pathogens and rapid dissemination around the world. The limited availability of anti-viral therapies and increased antibiotic resistance has made the therapeutic management of infectious disease a major challenge. Inflammation is a primordial defense to protect the host against invading microorganisms. However, dysfunctional inflammatory responses contribute to disease severity and mortality during infections. In recent years, a few studies have examined the relevance of resolution of inflammation in the context of infections. Inflammation resolution is an active integrated process transduced by several pro-resolving mediators, including Annexin A1 and Angiotensin-(1-7). Here, we examine some of the cellular and molecular circuits triggered by pro-resolving molecules and that may be beneficial in the context of infectious diseases.

Annexin A1 Mimetic Peptide and Piperlongumine: Anti-Inflammatory Profiles in Endotoxin-Induced Uveitis.

Uveitis is one of the main causes of blindness worldwide, and therapeutic alternatives are worthy of study. We investigated the effects of piperlongumine (PL) and/or annexin A1 (AnxA1) mimetic peptide Ac2-26 on endotoxin-induced uveitis (EIU). Rats were inoculated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and intraperitoneally treated with Ac2-26 (200 µg), PL (200 and 400 µg), or Ac2-26 + PL after 15 min. Then, 24 h after LPS inoculation, leukocytes in aqueous humor, mononuclear cells, AnxA1, formyl peptide receptor (fpr)1, fpr2, and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 were evaluated in the ocular tissues, along with inflammatory mediators in the blood and macerated supernatant. Decreased leukocyte influx, levels of inflammatory mediators, and COX-2 expression confirmed the anti-inflammatory actions of the peptide and pointed to the protective effects of PL at higher dosage. However, when PL and Ac2-26 were administered in combination, the inflammatory potential was lost. AnxA1 expression was elevated among groups treated with PL or Ac2-26 + PL but reduced after treatment with Ac2-26. Fpr2 expression was increased only in untreated EIU and Ac2-26 groups. The interaction between Ac2-26 and PL negatively affected the anti-inflammatory action of Ac2-26 or PL. We emphasize that the anti-inflammatory effects of PL can be used as a therapeutic strategy to protect against uveitis.

Decreased Annexin A1 expression enhances sensitivity to docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination induction chemotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Annexin A1, a member of the Annexin superfamily, has been shown to play a vital role in a broad range of molecular and cellular processes. This study aims to explore the relationship between the Annexin A1 expression and the clinical response to cisplatin, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) as induction chemotherapy in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: This study recruited two hundred thirty-two patients from a III/IVA OSCC trial. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the level of Annexin A1 expression. Overexpression and knockdown methods in HB96, HN4 and CAL27 cell lines were used to assess the role of Annexin A1 in the neoplastic cellular response to chemotherapy. RESULTS: We found that reduced expression of Annexin A1 conferred a prognostic benefit from induction chemotherapy based on the TPF drug combination in patients with moderately/poorly differentiated disease. Using an in vitro model, we found that low Annexin A1 enhanced cellular proliferation by activating the EGFR/AKT signalling pathway and inhibiting p27 expression. Furthermore, low Annexin A1 initiated a significant decrease in cell viability after treatment with TPF agents. In addition, downregulation of Annexin A1 promoted apoptosis induced by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, and upregulation of Annexin A1 inhibited apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Annexin A1 may be of prognostic value in patients with locally advanced OSCC who are managed with TPF chemotherapy, as low Annexin A1 promotes chemosensitivity to TPF chemotherapy in oral cancer cells via enhanced caspase-dependent apoptosis.

Annexin A1 protects against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by modulating microglia/macrophage polarization via FPR2/ALX-dependent AMPK-mTOR pathway.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a major cause of early complications and unfavorable outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Recent studies indicate that modulating microglia/macrophage polarization and subsequent inflammatory response may be a potential adjunct therapy to recanalization. Annexin A1 (ANXA1) exerts potent anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving properties in models of cerebral I/R injury. However, whether ANXA1 modulates post-I/R-induced microglia/macrophage polarization has not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: We retrospectively collected blood samples from AIS patients who underwent successful recanalization by EVT and analyzed ANXA1 levels longitudinally before and after EVT and correlation between ANXA1 levels and 3-month clinical outcomes. We also established a C57BL/6J mouse model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion (tMCAO/R) and an in vitro model of oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation (OGD/R) in BV2 microglia and HT22 neurons to explore the role of Ac2-26, a pharmacophore N-terminal peptide of ANXA1, in regulating the I/R-induced microglia/macrophage activation and polarization. RESULTS: The baseline levels of ANXA1 pre-EVT were significantly lower in 23 AIS patients, as compared with those of healthy controls. They were significantly increased to the levels found in controls 2-3 days post-EVT. The increased post-EVT levels of ANXA1 were positively correlated with 3-month clinical outcomes. In the mouse model, we then found that Ac2-26 administered at the start of reperfusion shifted microglia/macrophage polarization toward anti-inflammatory M2-phenotype in ischemic penumbra, thus alleviating blood-brain barrier leakage and neuronal apoptosis and improving outcomes at 3 days post-tMCAO/R. The protection was abrogated when mice received Ac2-26 together with WRW4, which is a specific antagonist of formyl peptide receptor type 2/lipoxin A4 receptor (FPR2/ALX). Furthermore, the interaction between Ac2-26 and FPR2/ALX receptor activated the 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and inhibited the downstream mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). These in vivo findings were validated through in vitro experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Ac2-26 modulates microglial/macrophage polarization and alleviates subsequent cerebral inflammation by regulating the FPR2/ALX-dependent AMPK-mTOR pathway. It may be investigated as an adjunct strategy for clinical prevention and treatment of cerebral I/R injury after recanalization. Plasma ANXA1 may be a potential biomarker for outcomes of AIS patients receiving EVT.

The formyl peptide receptor agonist Ac2-26 alleviates neuroinflammation in a mouse model of pneumococcal meningitis.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial meningitis is still a cause of severe neurological disability. The brain is protected from penetrating pathogens by the blood-brain barrier and the innate immune system. The invading pathogens are recognized by pattern recognition receptors including the G-protein-coupled formyl peptide receptors (FPRs), which are expressed by immune cells of the central nervous system. FPRs show a broad spectrum of ligands, including pro- and anti-inflammatory ones. Here, we investigated the effects of the annexin A1 mimetic peptide Ac2-26 in a mouse model of pneumococcal meningitis. METHODS: Wildtype (WT) and Fpr1- and Fpr2-deficient mice were intrathecally infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 (type 2). Subsequently, the different mice groups were treated by intraperitoneal injections of Ac2-26 (1 mg/kg body weight) 2, 8, and 24 h post-infection. The extent of inflammation was analyzed in various brain regions by means of immunohistochemistry and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) 30 h post-infection. RESULTS: Ac2-26-treated WT mice showed less severe neutrophil infiltration, paralleled by a reduced induction of pro-inflammatory glial cell responses in the hippocampal formation and cortex. While meningitis was ameliorated in Ac2-26-treated Fpr1-deficient mice, this protective effect was not observed in Fpr2-deficient mice. Irrespective of Ac2-26 treatment, inflammation was more severe in Fpr2-deficient compared to Fpr1-deficient mice. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study demonstrates anti-inflammatory properties of Ac2-26 in a model of bacterial meningitis, which are mediated via FPR2, but not FPR1. Ac2-26 and other FPR2 modulators might be promising targets for the development of novel therapies for Streptococcus pneumoniae-induced meningitis.

Harnessing inflammation resolving-based therapeutic agents to treat pulmonary viral infections: What can the future offer to COVID-19?

Inflammation is generally accepted as a component of the host defence system and a protective response in the context of infectious diseases. However, altered inflammatory responses can contribute to disease in infected individuals. Many endogenous mediators that drive the resolution of inflammation are now known. Overall, mediators of resolution tend to decrease inflammatory responses and provide normal or greater ability of the host to deal with infection. In the lung, it seems that pro-resolution molecules, or strategies that promote their increase, tend to suppress inflammation and lung injury and facilitate control of bacterial or viral burden. Here, we argue that the demonstrated anti-inflammatory, pro-resolving, anti-thrombogenic and anti-microbial effects of such endogenous mediators of resolution may be useful in the treatment of the late stages of the disease in patients with COVID-19.

Annexin A1 attenuates neuroinflammation through FPR2/p38/COX-2 pathway after intracerebral hemorrhage in male mice.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest stroke subtype and neuroinflammation is a critical component of the pathogenesis following ICH. Annexin A1-FPR2 signaling has been shown to play a protective role in animal stroke models. This study aimed to assess whether Annexin A1 attenuated neuroinflammation and brain edema after ICH and investigate the underlying mechanisms. Male CD-1 mice were subjected to collagenase-induced ICH. Annexin A1 was administered at 0.5 hr after ICH. Brain water content measurement, short-term and long-term neurobehavioral tests, Western blot and immnunofluorescence were performed. Results showed that Annexin A1 effectively attenuated brain edema, improved short-term neurological function and ameliorated microglia activation after ICH. Annexin A1 also improved memory function at 28 days after ICH. However, these beneficial effects were abolished with the administration of FPR2 antagonist Boc-2. Furthermore, AnxA1/FPR2 signaling may confer protective effects via inhibiting p38-associated inflammatory cascade. Our study demonstrated that Annexin A1/FPR2/p38 signaling pathway played an important role in attenuating neuroinflammation after ICH and that Annexin A1 could be a potential therapeutic strategy for ICH patients.