Adolescent/Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Experience from a Multisite Adolescent Medicine Collaborative.

OBJECTIVE: To report on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) experience and continuation rates in the Adolescent Medicine LARC Collaborative. STUDY DESIGN: LARC insertion data (682 implants and 681 intrauterine devices [IUDs]) were prospectively collected from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2019, across 3 Adolescent Medicine practices. Follow-up data through December 31, 2020, were included to ensure at least 1 year of follow-up of this cohort. Continuation rates were calculated at 1, 2, and 3 years, overall and by Adolescent Medicine site, as were descriptive statistics for LARC procedural complications and patient experience. RESULTS: Implant and IUD insertion complications were uncommon and largely self-limited, with no IUD-related uterine perforations. Uterine bleeding was the most frequently reported concern at follow-up (35% implant, 25% IUD), and a common reason for early device removal (45% of implant removals, 32% of IUD removals). IUD malposition or expulsion occurred following 6% of all insertions. The pooled implant continuation rate at 1 year was 87% (range, 86%-91% across sites; P = .63), 66% at 2 years (range, 62%-84%; P = .01), and 42% at 3 years (range, 36%-60%; P = .004). The pooled IUD continuation rate at 1 year was 88% (range, 87%-90% across sites; P = .82), 77% at 2 years (range, 76%-78%; P = .94), and 60% at 3 years (range, 57%-62%; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: LARC is successfully provided in Adolescent Medicine clinical settings, with continuation rates analogous to those of well-resourced clinical trials. Uterine bleeding after LARC insertion is common, making counselling imperative. Future analyses will assess whether the medical management of LARC-related nuisance bleeding improves continuation rates in our Adolescent Medicine patient population.

Association between the use of hormonal contraceptives and risk of cholecystectomy in women of reproductive age.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have indicated an increased risk of gallbladder disease with hormonal contraceptives although with discordant results. The potential increased risk of gallbladder disease with hormonal contraceptives is concerning given that women are at increased risk of this disease. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine risk of surgery-confirmed gallbladder disease (cholecystectomy) with oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and injectable hormonal contraceptives. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Females aged 15-45 who initiated hormonal contraceptive use were identified in the United States IQVIA Ambulatory electronic medical record database between 2008 and 2018. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for cholecystectomy with eight formulations of contraceptives compared with levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by lagging exposure by 90 days and by excluding patients with history of gallbladder disease. Secondary analyses were conducted by cumulative duration of use. RESULTS: We identified 1,425,821 females who initiated the use of hormonal contraceptives and generated 4417 cholecystectomy events. Overall, the use of medroxyprogesterone acetate (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.40) and at least 1 year of levonorgestrel intrauterine device use (HR: 1.74: 95% CI: 1.19-2.54) were associated with increased risk of cholecystectomy when compared with levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive. However, we did not observe an increased risk with other hormonal contraceptives. Consistent results were observed across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: In this large population-based study, there was an increased risk of cholecystectomy with medroxyprogesterone acetate and intrauterine device but not other hormonal contraceptives. Additional large observational studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Predicting menstrual bleeding patterns with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems.

PURPOSE: To develop a bleeding-pattern prediction model to inform counselling on amount and regularity of bleeding after levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fixed-cluster and regression-tree models were developed using bleeding data pooled from two clinical trials of LNG-IUSs. Models were trained and cross-validated on LNG-IUS 12 data, then applied to LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 8 data. Three clusters were generated for the fixed-cluster model: predominantly amenorrhoea; predominantly spotting; and predominantly bleeding. A random-forest model predicted the future-bleeding cluster, then the probability of cycle regularity was calculated. In the regression-tree model, women were assigned by the model to less- or more-bleeding groups. RESULTS: With LNG-IUS 12 (n = 1351) in the fixed-cluster model, 70.4% of women were correctly classified. The correct classification rates for LNG-IUS 20 (n = 216) and LNG-IUS 8 (n = 1300) were 72.2% and 69.0%. The probability distribution for cycle regularity showed regular and irregular bleeding were best separated with LNG-IUS 12 data, and less well with LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 8 data. In the regression-tree model there was high variability in the more- and less-bleeding group distributions with LNG-IUS 12 data. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-cluster model predicted bleeding patterns better than a regression-tree model in women using LNG-IUS, yielding understandable, informative output.

Uptake of long acting reversible contraception following integrated couples HIV and fertility goal-based family planning counselling in Catholic and non-Catholic, urban and rural government health centers in Kigali, Rwanda.

BACKGROUND: When integrated with couples' voluntary HIV counselling and testing (CVCT), family planning including long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) addresses prongs one and two of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT). METHODS: In this observational study, we enrolled equal numbers of HIV concordant and discordant couples in four rural and four urban clinics, with two Catholic and two non-Catholic clinics in each area. Eligible couples were fertile, not already using a LARC method, and wished to limit or delay fertility for at least 2 years. We provided CVCT and fertility goal-based family planning counselling with the offer of LARC and conducted multivariate analysis of clinic, couple, and individual predictors of LARC uptake. RESULTS: Of 1290 couples enrolled, 960 (74%) selected LARC: Jadelle 5-year implant (37%), Implanon 3-year implant (26%), or copper intrauterine device (IUD) (11%). Uptake was higher in non-Catholic clinics (85% vs. 63% in Catholic clinics, p < 0.0001), in urban clinics (82% vs. 67% in rural clinics, p < 0.0001), and in HIV concordant couples (79% vs. 70% of discordant couples, p = .0005). Religion of the couple was unrelated to clinic religious affiliation, and uptake was highest among Catholics (80%) and lowest among Protestants (70%) who were predominantly Pentecostal. In multivariable analysis, urban location and non-Catholic clinic affiliation, Catholic religion of woman or couple, younger age of men, lower educational level of both partners, non-use of condoms or injectable contraception at enrollment, prior discussion of LARC by the couple, and women not having concerns about negative side effects of implant were associated with LARC uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility goal-based LARC recommendations combined with couples' HIV counselling and testing resulted in a high uptake of LARC methods, even among discordant couples using condoms for HIV prevention, in Catholic clinics, and in rural populations. This model successfully integrates prevention of HIV and unplanned pregnancy.

Long-acting reversible contraception side effect management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is increasingly used by adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Subsequent to LARC insertion, AYAs are presenting to their primary care providers with LARC concerns. This article seeks to equip primary care clinicians with the tools necessary to assess and manage common LARC-associated side effects. RECENT FINDINGS: Side effects are common with progestin-only LARC, and can precipitate early discontinuation of an otherwise effective, low-maintenance form of contraception. Abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, acne, and weight change are often cited as progestin-only LARC side effects, yet the causes are poorly understood despite extensive research. While most side effects improve with time, therapeutic interventions are available for patients with undesirable side effects that prefer medical management. Research emphasizes the importance of proper patient counseling and clinical follow-up. SUMMARY: Counseling remains essential in the management of LARC-associated side effects. However, options are available to temporarily mitigate such side effects and increase LARC satisfaction. While these therapeutic options are prescribed based on expert opinion, such regimens remain inadequately studied in AYA populations.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Specific Issues for Adolescents.

Long-acting reversible contraceptives are the most effective methods to prevent pregnancy and also offer noncontraceptive benefits such as reducing menstrual blood flow and dysmenorrhea. The safety and efficacy of long-acting reversible contraception are well established for adolescents, but the rate of use remains low for this population. The pediatrician can play a key role in increasing access to long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents by providing accurate patient-centered contraception counseling and by understanding and addressing the barriers to use.

Providing Long-acting Reversible Contraception to Adolescents: A Review.

Unintended teen pregnancy continues to be a problem in the United States which has the highest rate of adolescent pregnancy among developed nations. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has much higher continuation rates compared with moderately effective reversible contraception; however, moderately effective reversible contraception is more commonly used by adolescents. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend LARC as first-line contraception for adolescents. Clinicians providing contraception to adolescents should be knowledgeable of LARC indications, side effects, initiation guidelines, management of adverse reactions, and adolescent specific issues regarding LARC counseling, initiation, and continuation.

Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are safe, effective and convenient post-abortal methods. However, there is concern that some LARCs may reduce the effectiveness of abortifacient drugs or result in other adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: We undertook two systematic reviews to examine the early administration of LARCs in women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. (i) For women who are having a medical abortion and who plan to use a progestogen-only contraceptive implant or injectable, does administration of the contraception at the same time as mifepristone influence the efficacy of the abortion? (Implant/injectable review). (ii) For women who have had a medical abortion, how soon after expulsion of the products of conception is it safe to insert an intrauterine contraceptive device/system? (LNG-IUS/Cu-IUD review). SEARCH METHODS: On 19 November 2018, we searched Embase Classic, Embase; Ovid MEDLINE(R) including Daily and Epub Ahead-of-Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations; the Cochrane Library; Cinahl Plus; and Web of Science Core Collection. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in English from 1985 (Implant/injectable review) or 2007 (LNG-IUS/Cu-IUD review) onwards, conducted in women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol and studying either (i) simultaneous administration of mifepristone and a progestogen-only contraceptive implant or injectable compared to administration >24 h after mifepristone, or (ii) immediate insertion of intrauterine contraception after expulsion of the products of conception compared to early insertion (≤7 days) or to delayed insertion (>7 days) or early compared to delayed insertion. One author assessed the risk of bias in the studies using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for RCTs. All the outcomes were analysed as risk ratios and meta-analysed in Review Manager 5.3 using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and a fixed-effect model. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. OUTCOMES: Two RCTs (n = 1027) showed lower 'subsequent unintended pregnancy' rates and higher 'patient satisfaction' rates, and no other differences, after simultaneous administration of mifepristone and the implant compared to delayed administration. One RCT (n = 461) showed higher 'patient satisfaction' rates after simultaneous administration than after delayed administration of mifepristone and the injectable, but no other differences between these interventions. Three RCTs (n = 536) found no differences other than higher copper IUC uptake after early compared to delayed insertion at ≤9 weeks of gestation and higher rates of IUC expulsion, continuation and uptake after immediate compared to delayed insertion at 9+1-12+0 weeks of gestation and higher IUC continuation rates after immediate compared to delayed insertion at 12+1-20+0 weeks of gestation. The quality of this evidence ranged from very low to high and was mainly compromised by low event rates, high attrition and no blinding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The contraceptive implant or injectable should be offered on the day of taking mifepristone. Intrauterine methods of contraception should be offered as soon as possible after expulsion of the pregnancy.

Perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception among women receiving medication for opioid use disorder in Vermont.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate perceptions of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) among women receiving medication for opioid use disorder. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 200 women receiving medication for opioid use disorder in Vermont. RESULTS: A considerable proportion of women receiving medication for opioid use disorder in Vermont reported previous use of an IUD (40%) and/or a subdermal contraceptive implant (16%); the majority of prior LARC users were satisfied with their IUD (68%) or their implant (74%). Of the 38% of participants who had never considered IUD use, 85% percent (64/75) said that they knew nothing or only a little about IUDs. Of the 61% of participants who had never considered an implant, 81% percent (98/121) said that they knew nothing or only a little about the contraceptive method. The most commonly reported reasons for a lack of interest in the IUD and/or implant were concerns about side effects and preference for a woman-controlled method. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in LARC knowledge are common among those who have not used LARCs and concerns about side effects and preferences for a woman-controlled method limit some women's interest in these contraceptives. Additionally, reasons for dissatisfaction among past users are generally similar for IUD and implant and include irregular bleeding and having a bad experience with the method. IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to increase awareness of LARC methods among women receiving medication for opioid use disorder should address concerns about side effects and reproductive autonomy and encourage satisfied LARC users to share their experiences with their social networks.

Predictors of Discontinuation of Subdermal Levonorgestrel Implants (Jadelle) at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria: An Analytic Cohort Study.

Uptake and continuation of long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) such as subdermal levonorgestrel implants are pivotal to the achievement of some sustainable development goals (SDG). We evaluated Jadelle uptake and factors affecting its discontinuation in the first three years of initiation at the Family Planning Clinic of the College of Medicine, University of Lagos (CMUL), Nigeria. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 517 consecutive new Jadelle acceptors, at the family planning clinic of CMUL, between 1 October 2007 and 30 September 2010, who were followed up till 30 September 2011. Survival life table analysis, Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were conducted to evaluate factors affecting time to Jadelle discontinuation. Stata version 13 statistical software (StataCorp USA) was used for analysis. The mean age of Jadelle acceptors was 32.9 (S.D: ±5.4) years and uptake rate of Jadelle was 61.8%. The overall discontinuation rate was 19 per 100 women-years while the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year Jadelle discontinuation rates were 7.1%; 27.0% and 58.1% respectively. Increased age, (P=0.047) and previous contraceptive use (P <0.001) were independent predictors of Jadelle discontinuation. Menstrual irregularity (51.4%) and intention to get pregnant (40.3%) were the commonest reasons for discontinuation. The failure rate was low at 0.27 per 100 women-years. This study showed that Jadelle had a high uptake rate complimented by a low failure rate; and is quite suitable for postpartum childbirth spacing as well as ongoing long term contraception.

Prevalence of early discontinuation and associated factors among a retrospective cohort of etonogestrel contraceptive implant users.

Purpose: To characterise the frequency of and predictors of contraceptive implant discontinuation within 12 months of insertion in our clinical setting.Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included women receiving the etonogestrel contraceptive implant at our hospital between May 2007 and May 2012. We abstracted data from charts including implant removal date, bleeding complaints, reproductive and demographic characteristics, prior contraceptive use, tobacco use and implant insertion timing. Our primary outcome was implant discontinuation within 12 months following insertion. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to generate frequencies, bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models.Results: Implant discontinuation was documented in 16% of implant users prior to 12 months (89/544). Women with documented bleeding complaints in the medical record were more likely to discontinue within 12 months (OR: 4.36, CI: 2.71, 7.00). No other demographic or clinical characteristics were associated with premature discontinuation. Having less than two prior pregnancies and tobacco use were associated with documented bleeding complaints.Conclusions: Discontinuation of the implant is associated with bleeding complaints. Women with lower parity and tobacco users may be more likely to experience bleeding or to find it intolerable.

Predictors of Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Before 30 Months of Use by Adolescents and Young Women.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the article was to describe adolescent and young women's rates of discontinuation of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants, the extent to which discontinuation is predicted by baseline factors, reasons for discontinuation, and subsequent contraceptive initiation. METHODS: We recruited English-speaking women, aged 13-24 years, from a family planning clinic serving clients <25 years old. Participants completed surveys before and after contraceptive initiation visits. We reviewed medical records and contacted participants who initiated use of an IUD or contraceptive implant and assessed contraceptive discontinuation before 30 months of use. We collected follow-up data on duration of use, reasons for discontinuation, and new method selected. We used multivariable regression models to ascertain factors associated with method discontinuation. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2013, 775 young women completed surveys and initiated IUD or implant use. We determined 30-month discontinuation status of 633 women (81.7%). Among those with known outcome, fewer IUD than implant initiators had discontinued use (36.3% vs. 45.4%, p = .02). Mean duration of use was 733 days (95% confidence interval 702-763 days) for the IUD and 697 days (95% confidence interval 666-728 days) for the implant. Participants who stated at baseline that it was "very important" to avoid pregnancy were about half as likely to discontinue use. The most common reasons for discontinuation were pain (IUD) and bleeding (implant). Most participants initiated alternate contraception after discontinuing their original method. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents and young women who initiate an IUD or implant make decisions for discontinuation based on weighing high contraceptive effectiveness with other reproductive health values and preferences.

Use of long-acting reversible contraception in a cluster-random sample of female sex workers in Kenya.

OBJECTIVE: To assess correlates of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use, and explore patterns of LARC use among female sex workers (FSWs) in Kenya. METHODS: Baseline cross-sectional data were collected between September 2016 and May 2017 in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Mombasa. Eligibility criteria included current sex work, age 16-34 years, not pregnant, and not planning pregnancy. Peer educators recruited FSWs from randomly selected sex-work venues. Multiple logistic regression identified correlates of LARC use. Prevalence estimates were weighted to adjust for variation in FSW numbers recruited across venues. RESULTS: Among 879 participants, the prevalence of contraceptive use was 22.6% for implants and 1.6% for intra-uterine devices (IUDs). LARC use was independently associated with previous pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio for one pregnancy, 11.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.25-30.8), positive attitude to and better knowledge of family planning, younger age, and lower education. High rates of adverse effects were reported for all methods. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that implant use has increased among FSWs in Kenya. Unintended pregnancy risks remain high and IUD use is negligible. Although LARC rates are encouraging, further intervention is required to improve both uptake (particularly of IUDs) and greater access to family planning services.

Opportunity, satisfaction, and regret: Trying long-acting reversible contraception in a unique scientific circumstance.

Increased use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) can reduce unintended pregnancies. However, significant barriers exist to LARC uptake, particularly high up-front costs. In North Carolina in 2014, we interviewed thirty-four purposively selected participants (aged 20-30 years) enrolled in a partially randomized patient preference trial to learn about their experiences with and attitudes toward contraception in this unique trial context. Cost of LARC was important in participants' decision-making. Experiencing an unintended pregnancy motivated women to switch to LARC. No participants who tried LARC, even those who experienced side effects, regretted it. Several participants regretted discontinuing their LARC. Concerns about insertion and removal did not influence future willingness to try LARC. Participants discussed the importance of affordability and feeling in control when choosing a contraceptive method. Cost, combined with uncertainty over whether LARC is the right method for them, may deter young women from trying LARC. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants should be made affordable so that women can try them without significant financial commitment. Affordability will likely increase uptake, which will reduce unintended pregnancies. Regret from discontinuing LARC was more frequently reported than regret from trying LARC. Providers should offer young women LARC and counsel to support continuation.

Use of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Management of Side Effects from Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives: A Quality Improvement Report.

INTRODUCTION: Many health care providers believe that women who initiate long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) discontinue the method because of side effects too soon for the method to be economical. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement and evaluate an evidence-based telephone triage nursing guideline for management of side effects of LARC with an ultimate goal of reducing the number of early discontinuations. PROCESS: A telephone triage guideline was adapted from the Contraceptive Choice Project's Clinician Call Back System, supplemented with evidence-based resources, and approved by clinicians at 2 community women's health and midwifery offices. Baseline retrospective data were collected on all women over the age of 18 who had LARC inserted at the 2 sites in the year prior to guideline implementation and in the 3 months after implementation. Rates of LARC removal at or before 3 months postinsertion, before and after guideline implementation, were evaluated. OUTCOMES: Approximately 1 in 5 women called for help managing LARC side effects. Of the callers, 3 of 32 (9.4%) women receiving standard care discontinued their LARC prior to 3 months, whereas 0 of 24 women who were triaged using the guideline discontinued their LARC prior to 3 months (P = .12). Cramping, bleeding, and malposition or expulsion were the most common concerns and reasons for discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Fewer women than anticipated called to report side effects, and even fewer chose to discontinue their LARC early. There were fewer discontinuations with guideline use, but this was not a statistically significant difference. Most women did not discontinue their LARC early for any reason, including side effects.

Contraception Update: Extended Use of Long Acting Methods, Hormonal Contraception Risks, and Over the Counter Access.

The clinical update serves as a brief review of recently published, high-impact, and potentially practice changing journal articles summarized for our readers. Topics include menopause, sexual dysfunction, breast health, contraception, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease. For this clinical update, we reviewed both reproductive and general medical journals for clinically relevant publications related to the use of contraceptive methods. We have chosen to highlight articles examining the extended use of highly effective (long-acting) methods, complications of implants, risks associated with oral combined hormonal contraceptives, and the availability of over the counter contraception.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Difficult Insertions and Removals.

The use of long-acting reversible contraception is on the rise across the United States and has contributed to a decrease in teen pregnancies. With the increased use of long-acting reversible contraception, physicians may encounter difficult insertions and removals of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the contraceptive implant. Uterine structure (e.g., extreme anteversion or retroversion, uterine tone during the postpartum period and breastfeeding) can pose challenges during IUD insertion. Special consideration is also needed for IUD insertions in patients who are transgender or gender nonconforming, such as psychosocial support and management of vaginal atrophy. Missing IUD strings may complicate removal, possibly requiring ultrasonography and use of instruments such as thread retrievers, IUD hooks, and alligator forceps. Regarding implant removal, those that are barely palpable (e.g., because of an overly deep insertion or excessive patient weight gain), removal may require ultrasonography, use of vas clamps and skin hooks, and extra dissection.