Case report: Immunotherapy-based combination therapy achieving complete remission and prolonged survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with extensive bone marrow metastasis.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with bone marrow metastasis presents a rare and challenging clinical scenario associated with exceedingly poor prognosis. While standard treatment regimens offer limited efficacy and tolerability in such cases, individualized approaches are increasingly necessary. We present the case of a 64-year-old male diagnosed with recurrent nonkeratinizing undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with extensive bone marrow metastasis (rTxN0M1). Treatment was initiated with immunotherapy-based combination therapy, consisting of pembrolizumab and low-dose cisplatin, which resulted in an initial response. Subsequently, there was a transition to standard-dose nab-paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by maintenance therapy with pembrolizumab plus fruquintinib. The patient achieved a sustained response with renormalization of tumor markers, imaging findings, and bone biopsies, resulting in complete remission. This case highlights the successful management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with extensive bone marrow metastasis through an individualized treatment approach incorporating immunotherapy.

[Comparison of the efficacy of carelizumab combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the induction therapy of locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma].

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of carrelizumab combined with the modified TPF regimen (docetaxel, cisplatinand capecitabine) and TPF regimen alone in larynx preservation strategy for locally advanced resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: A cohort study was conducted. Patients with locally advanced resectable hypopharyngeal carcinoma (cT3-4aN0-3bM0) who were treated at the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University from January 2017 to April 2023 were enrolled in the study. One group was treated with a modified TPF regimen (TPF group) for 2-3 cycles (retrospective data), and the other group was a prospective phase Ⅱ trial with a modified TPF regimen combined with carrelizumab (TPFC group) for three cycles. The patients with complete or partial remission of the primary focus were treated with sequential radical radiotherapy and/or drug therapy. The patients in the TPFC group were treated with carrelizumab at the end of radiotherapy with a maximum of up to 18 doses. The patients with stable or progressive disease were given radical surgery, and those who refused the surgery were given radical chemoradiotherapy. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, larynx preservation rate (LPR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 51 male patients in the TPFC group, with an median age of 57 (35, 69) years. Meanwhile, 44 patients were in the TPF group, among which 43 were male and one was female, with an median age of 62 (46, 70) years. The ORR of the TPFC group was higher than that of the TPF group [82.4% (42/51) vs 63.6% (28/44), P=0.039]. During a median follow-up of 24.4 (18.5, 31.4) months, the TPFC group showed a higher 2-year survival rate (84.8% vs 64.6%, P=0.013) and 2-year LPR (66.6% vs 48.6%, P=0.045) than those in the TPF group. In patients with poor effect of induction therapy for hypopharyngeal carcinoma, surgical combination therapy significantly prolonged the 2-year PFS rate (77.9% vs 18.2%, P<0.001) and 2-year survival rate (76.9% vs 45.5%, P=0.005)than those of non-surgical combination therapy. The incidences of nausea and/or vomiting, reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, thyroid dysfunction, and rash were increased in the TPFC group (all P<0.05). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusion: Carrelizumab combined with a modified TPF regimen has good efficacy and safety and can improve the LPR of locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

The therapeutic efficacy of 5-ALA based photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy combination in triple negative breast cancer cells.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the subtypes of breast cancer characterized by a heterogeneous and aggressive nature. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has drawn significant attention in cancer treatment. However, solubility of photosensitizer, penetration problems into a target tissue and insufficient oxygen concentration limit the effectiveness of PDT. To overcome these limitations and to reduce the side effects of chemotherapy, combination treatment modalities play an essential role in cancer treatment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the combination efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)/PDT in TNBC cells and healthy breast cells in vitro. To determine the effect of the combination effects of cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT on TNBC cells, two treatment protocols (simultaneous and sequential combination therapy) were evaluated compared with cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT monotherapy and WST-1, Annexin V assay, acridine orange (AO) and mitochondrial staining were performed. Our findings showed that MDA-MB-231 TNBC cell viability was significantly decreased following simultaneous combination treatment compared to cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT monotherapy. Additionally, simultaneous combination treatment was more effective than sequential combination treatment. The simultaneous combination treatment of 2.5 µM cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT at 6 J/cm2 and 9 J/cm2 induced 46.78% and 53.6% total apoptotic death, respectively in TNBC cells compared with monotherapies (cisplatin (37.88%) and 5-ALA/PDT (6 J/cm2: 31.48% and 9 J/cm2: 37.78%). Additionally, cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT combination treatment resulted in nuclear fragmentation and mitochondrial damage due to apoptosis. Our results suggest that cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT simultaneous combination therapy could be a promising new alternative strategy for treating TNBC. However, further studies are required to assess the underlying molecular mechanisms of cisplatin and 5-ALA/PDT combination treatment at the molecular level.

Additional chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a potentially efficient therapeutic intervention for superficial esophageal cancer. Additional treatment such as chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or esophagectomy is recommended in cases of muscularis mucosa invasion with positive resection margins or lymphovascular invasion or submucosal layer invasion, which are considered noncurative ESD, due to an increased risk of lymph node metastasis. However, the adequacy of additional CRT after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD has not been fully discussed. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of additional CRT for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD, which was defined as a mucosal defect measuring ≥ 3/4 of the esophageal circumference. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 24 patients who received additional CRT for superficial esophageal SCC after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD between 2012 and 2018. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was performed in all patients and boost irradiation (BI) was performed after ENI in 4 patients with positive resection margins. The prescription doses of ENI and BI were 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions and 9 Gy in 5 fractions, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy (a combination of cisplatin or nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil) was administered to all patients. RESULTS: The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92% and 78%, respectively, while the 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 83% and 70%, respectively. Grade 2 esophageal stenosis occurred in 8 (33%) patients. There was no case of Grade 3 or worse esophageal stenosis. Among them, 4 (17%) patients developed stenosis before additional CRT, which persisted after the completion of additional CRT. The remaining 4 (17%) patients developed de novo stenosis within 5 months following the completion of additional CRT. One patient (4%) still requires regular bougie dilation. Grade 3 and Grade 4 acute toxicity, including anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and esophagitis occurred in 1 (4%) and 0 (0%), 6 (25%) and 1 (4%), 1 (4%) and 0 (0%), and 1 (4%) and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. One (4%) patient who underwent salvage CRT for the out-of-field lymph node recurrence died with acute myeloid leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: Additional CRT is a viable treatment option even in patients who have undergone near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD. Esophageal stenosis after additional CRT following near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD is manageable and acceptable.

Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center, single-arm study, we enrolled patients (18-70 years) with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC1r-IVA and IVB (distant metastasis only with inguinal lymph node metastasis) cervical cancer. Eligible patients should have normal function of the bone marrow (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 2.0 × 109/L) and adequate hepatic and renal functions. Key exclusion criteria included: previous chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; a history of bone marrow dysplasia or other hematopoietic abnormalities. All patients underwent radical radiotherapy (pelvic radiotherapy or extended-field irradiation) plus brachytherapy. The chemotherapy regimen included four cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin. PEG-rhG-CSF was administered 48-72 h after each treatment cycle. Salvage granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was only permitted in certain circumstances. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints included frequency of febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy completion rate in cycles 2-4, time to complete radiotherapy, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 52 patients were enrolled in this study from July 2019 to October 2020. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 28.8%, with an average duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia persistence of 3.85 days (1-7 days). The incidence rate of FN was 3.8%. The chemotherapy completion rate was 94.2%, 82.7%, and 75.0% for cycles 2-4, respectively. The incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia for cycles 1-4 were 9.6% (5/52), 8.2% (4/49), 14.0% (6/43), and 2.6% (1/39), respectively. All patients completed radiotherapy within 8 weeks (median, 48 days; range: 41-56 days), except one patient who withdrew consent and did not receive radiotherapy. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was not observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: PEG-rhG-CSF is an effective and safe prophylactic treatment for neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024494. Date of Registration:13/July/2019.

Improved efficacy of cisplatin delivery by peanut agglutinin­modified liposomes in non­small cell lung cancer.

Globally, non­small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant threat to human health, and constitutes >80% of lung cancer cases. Cisplatin (CDDP), a commonly used drug in clinical treatment, has been the focus of research aiming to mitigate its potent toxicity through encapsulation within liposomes. However, challenges, such as a reduced drug loading efficiency and nonspecific release, have emerged as obstacles. The present study aimed to improve the encapsulation efficiency of CDDP within liposomes by pre­preparation of CDDP and modifying the liposome surface through the incorporation of peanut agglutinin (PNA) as a ligand [CDDP­loaded PNA­modified liposomes (CDDP­PNA­Lip)]. This strategy was designed to enhance the delivery of CDDP to tumour tissues, thereby reducing associated side effects. The effect of CDDP­PNA­Lip on the proliferation and migration of NSCLC cell lines with high MUC1 expression was elucidated through in vitro studies. Additionally, the capacity of PNA modification to augment the targeted anti­tumour efficacy of liposomes was assessed through xenograft tumour experiments. The results indicated that in an in vitro uptake assay Rhodamine B (RhB)­loaded PNA­modified liposomes were taken up by cells with ~50% higher efficiency compared with free RhB. In addition, CDDP­PNA­Lip resulted in a 2.65­fold enhancement of tumour suppression in vivo compared with free CDDP. These findings suggested that the encapsulation of CDDP within ligand­modified liposomes may significantly improve its tumour­targeting capabilities, providing valuable insights for clinical drug development.

[Treatment strategies of cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review].

Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with rapid disease progression. Hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) done immediately after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has become an important treatment for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients. However, different treatment options for HIPEC exist with potential influence on survival rates and prognosis in patients, exist. These treatment options include open or closed abdomen technique, perfusion solution, number of catheters, temperature, duration, and drug regimens. This paper aims to provide more evidence on standardization of HIPEC treatment options and technologies by systematically reviewing different drug regimens and technical approaches. The study included 2 randomized controlled trials, 3 phase I/II clinical trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 34 retrospective cohort studies, involving 1511 patients. The most common HIPEC option is to dissolve 50-75 mg/m2 of Cisplatin and 30-40 mg/m2 of Mitomycin C in 3-4 L saline solution at 42-43℃. After gastrointestinal anastomosis, 2-3 catheters are used in the HIPEC system with a perfusion flow rate of 500 ml/min. The duration is 60-90 minutes. Anastomotic leakage was low in studies where HIPEC was performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis. The utilization of open HIPEC and a two-drug regimen resulted in improved overall survival rates. The future development of HIPEC aims to enhance tumor-specific therapy by optimizing various aspects, such as identifying the safest and most effective chemotherapy regimens, refining patient selection criteria, and improving perioperative care.

Association of low adherence to weekly cisplatin with outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommends consideration of weekly cisplatin as an alternative option for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation. However, in a recent phase III trial (ConCERT), 20% of patients treated with weekly cisplatin could not receive a total of 200 mg/m2, and the association of low adherence to weekly cisplatin and cancer control outcomes remains unclear. To fill this knowledge gap, we performed an observational cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) between November 2007 and April 2023. Adherence to weekly cisplatin was defined as receiving at least 5 cycles with a total cumulative dose of 200 mg/m2. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard multivariable (MVA) analyses. Logistic MVA was performed to identify variables associated with low adherence to weekly cisplatin. Fine-Gray MVA was performed to analyze failure outcomes with death as a competing event. RESULTS: Among 119 patients who met our criteria, 51 patients (42.9%) had low adherence to weekly cisplatin. Median follow up was 19.8 months (interquartile range 8.8-65.6). Low adherence to weekly cisplatin was associated with worse overall survival (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-5.47, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (aHR 2.32, 95% CI 1.29-4.17, p = 0.005). It was also associated with worse distant failure (aHR 4.55, 95% CI 1.19-17.3, p = 0.03), but not locoregional failure (aHR 1.61, 95% CI 0.46-5.58, p = 0.46). KPS < 90 was the only variable associated with low adherence to weekly cisplatin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.67, 95% CI 1.10-6.65, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that over 40% of patients underwent fewer than 5 weekly cisplatin cycles and that low adherence to weekly cisplatin was an independent, adverse prognostic factor for worse survival and distant failure outcomes. Those with reduced adherence to weekly cisplatin were more likely to have poor performance status. Further studies are warranted to improve the adherence to chemotherapy and outcomes.

A propensity score-matched comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin-5FU and carboplatin-paclitaxel in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A Turkish oncology group study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant treatment is the standard treatment in locally advanced ESCC. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen is not known. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational cohort study conducted with propensity score matching. Patients with resectable ESCC from 13 tertiary centers from Türkiye were screened between January 2011 and December 2021. We compared the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the CF and the CROSS regimens in patients with ESCC. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-two patients were screened. Patients who received induction chemotherapy (n = 72) and CROSS-ineligible (n = 31) were excluded. Two hundred and fifty nine patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After propensity score matching (n = 97 in both groups), the mPFS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 9.3-27.4) and 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.6-35.7; p = 0.974), and the mOS was 35.2 months (95% CI, 18.9-51.5) and 39.6 months (95% CI 20.1-59.2; p = 0.534), in the CF and the CROSS groups, respectively. There was no difference between subgroups regarding PFS and OS. Compared with the CF group, the CROSS group had a higher incidence of neutropenia (34.0% vs. 62.9%, p < 0.001) and anemia (54.6% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.003) in all grades. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in grade 3-4 anemia, grade 3-4 neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia between groups. There were more dose reductions and dose delays in the CROSS group than in the CF group (11.3% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.026 and 34.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.009, respectively). The resection rate was 52.6% in the CF-RT and 35.1% in the CROSS groups (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Favorable PFS and pCR rates and a comparable OS were obtained with the CROSS regimen over the CF regimen as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with ESCC.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion. RESULTS: Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus Docetaxel-Cisplatin-Fluorouracil (DCF) versus CRT plus Fluorouracil-Folinic Acid (FUFA) in Stage III Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the optimal management strategy in resectable gastric cancer. There is a debate about the efficacy of more aggressive CRT plus chemotherapy regimens in adjuvant setting. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant CRT plus docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) versus CRT plus fluorouracil-folinic acid (FUFA) in stage III gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of stage III gastric cancer treated with adjuvant therapy after curative resection were analyzed. Patients' disease characteristics and impacts of the regimens on median disease-free survival (DFS) and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients (102 in FUFA arm and 59 in DCF arm) with a median age of 56.0 (29-79) were evaluated. In the DCF arm, there were more renal toxicities (31.6% vs 6.4% P < 0.001), emergency department admissions (64.9% vs 23.7%, P < 0.001), and dose reductions/treatment modifications in the DCF arm (51.6% vs 37.2, P < 0.001). The median follow-up was 23 months (1-124) in the FUFA arm and 26.0 months (1-77) in the DCF arm. The median DFS was 25.0 months (%95 CI, 12.7-37.2) in the DCF arm and 17.0 months (%95 CI, 2.6-31.3) in the FUFA arm, P = 0.66. The median OS was 28.0 months (%95 CI, 17.0-38.9) in the DCF arm and 25.0 months (%95 CI, 11.9-36.0) in the FUFA arm, P = 0.70. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, when compared with FUFA regimen, more aggressive therapy with DCF was more toxic and did not improve OS in adjuvant setting of stage III gastric cancer.

No lipiodol, no beads-another transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with fine cisplatin powder and porous gelatin particles for TACE-naïve, multifocal, up-to-seven out hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: The Japanese Interventional oncology group (JIVROSG) showed the efficacy and safety of nonselective transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with fine cisplatin powder (diamminedichloroplatinum; DDP-H) (65 mg/m2) and porous gelatin particles (DDP-H TACE) without lipiodol for extensive multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are no studies on this method following the JIVROSG study. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this new DDP-H TACE and its effect on liver function. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of TACE-naïve patients with multifocal HCC (Child-Pugh class A, up-to-seven out, no prior history of systemic therapy) who underwent whole-liver DDP-H TACE between January 2006 and December 2019. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 71 (range, 35-88) years. The median maximum size of tumors was 26 (range, 8-184) mm; 86.7% of patients met the up-to-11 criteria out. The overall survival duration was 30.3 months. At the time of initial evaluation (median, 45 days), the overall response rate was 65.0%; the disease control rate was 86.7% based on the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors guideline. Although nine patients' liver function had deteriorated to Child-Pugh class B at initial evaluation, six of them recovered to Child-Pugh class A. Only three patients (5%) showed permanently impaired liver function. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-liver DDP-H TACE without lipiodol or beads effectively reduced tumors and preserved liver function.

Successful treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor: a case report.

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-dUT) is a devastating subtype of thoracic tumor with SMARCA4 inactivation and is characterized by rapid progression, poor prognosis, and high risk of postoperative recurrence. However, effective treatments for SMARCA4-dUT are lacking. Herein, we describe a patient with SMARCA4-dUT who exhibited an impressive response to the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody (tislelizumab) in combination with conventional chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SMARCA4-dUT treated with chemotherapy, comprising etoposide and cisplatin, combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. Immunotherapy combined with etoposide and cisplatin may be a promising strategy to treat SMARCA4-dUT.

Trajectories of squamous cell carcinoma antigen and outcomes of patients with advanced penile cancer after chemotherapy based on paclitaxel, ifosfamid, and cisplatin regimen.

INTRODUCTION: Penile cancer (PC) is a lethal malignancy with no effective prognostic biomarker. We aim to investigate associations between trajectories of squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-A) and patient outcomes after chemotherapy based on paclitaxel, ifosfamid, and cisplatin (TIP) regimen. METHODS: Consecutive AJCC staging III/IV PC patients who received TIP chemotherapy and repeated SCC-A measurements in 2014-2022 were analyzed. Latent class growth mixed (LCGM) models were employed to characterize patients' serum SCC-A trajectories. Patient survival, and clinical and pathological tumor responses were compared. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to adjust confounding factors. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. LCGM models identified two distinct trajectories of SCC-A: low-stable (40%; n = 32) and high-decline (60%; n = 48). Overall survival (HR [95% CI]: 3.60 [1.23-10.53], p = 0.019), progression-free survival (HR [95% CI]: 11.33 [3.19-40.3], p < 0.001), objective response rate (37.5% vs. 62.5% p = 0.028), disease control rate (60.4% vs. 96.9% p < 0.00), and pathological complete response rate (21.2% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.014) were significantly worse in the high-decline arm. CONCLUSION: PC patients' SCC-A change rate was associated with tumor response and patient survival after TIP chemotherapy. SCC-A might assist tumor monitoring after systemic therapies.

Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial. SETTING: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up. CONCLUSION: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

Optimal Number of Cycles of First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In recent years, switch maintenance after platinum-based chemotherapy has been a standard of care. However, the appropriate number of systemic chemotherapy cycles against advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains unclear. This study assessed the survival outcomes of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy according to treatment cycles in patients with metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with metastatic bladder and upper urinary tract cancer who received platinum-based combination therapy. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 179 patients, 47 (26.3%) were women, and 73 (40.8%) had upper urinary tract cancer. Furthermore, 47 (26.3%) who were not eligible for cisplatin received carboplatin. The median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range=1-14 cycles). The rates of progressive disease within two cycles, from two to four cycles, and from four to six cycles were 18.4%, 19.2%, and 30.6%, respectively. The median OS of patients with 2, 3, 4, 5-6, and ≥7 treatment cycles were 8.6, 14.3, 21.3, 24.4, and 26.1 months, respectively. The OS did not significantly differ between patients receiving four treatment cycles and those receiving ≥5 treatment cycles. In patients with disease control (complete or partial response or stable disease) receiving ≥4 treatment cycles, there was no significant difference in terms of OS between patients receiving four cycles and those receiving six cycles. CONCLUSION: Four cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy can be effective in patients with metastatic UC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab for locally advanced vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVES: External beam radiation with sensitizing platinum is the recommended therapy for locally advanced vulvar cancers not amenable to curative surgery and is associated with considerable acute and chronic side effects. Radical vulvectomy post-radiation for persistent disease is often compromised with poor wound healing. We describe clinical outcomes for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus bevacizumab followed by radical vulvectomy for locally advanced vulvar cancer. METHODS: We performed retrospective analyses of all patients at our institution who underwent radical vulvectomy from January 2015 to November 2023. Of 113 patients, 13 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Demographics and clinicopathologic data were extracted, and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were further evaluated for response, adverse effects, and survival. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 13 patients with stage II-IV disease that involved the urethra, vagina, or anus. Lesion sizes ranged from 4 to 20 cm (median 7 cm). Patients received 2-6 cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. Nine (69.2%) patients had partial pathologic responses, and four patients had complete responses. All patients had negative surgical margins. Ten (76.9%) patients had radiographic evidence of inguinal lymph node metastasis prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and four had residual nodal disease. Only one patient developed a superficial groin seroma. Three patients developed recurrence, two locally and one distant, and there was one death. The median follow-up was 23 months (range 6-84 months). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using combination platinum/paclitaxel/bevacizumab was efficacious for locally advanced vulvar cancer, resulting in complete resections, negative margins, and excellent wound healing. A multi-institutional phase II trial is warranted to validate these findings.

Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis. METHODS: TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin using a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by disease status and primary tumour location. Participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Investigators and participants were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. TOPAZ-1 met its primary endpoint at the preplanned interim analysis, and the study is active but no longer recruiting participants. Updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1, with additional follow-up (data cutoff Feb 25, 2022) and data maturity beyond the interim analysis, are reported here. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The TOPAZ-1 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03875235. FINDINGS: From April 16, 2019, to Dec 11, 2020, 914 participants were enrolled, 685 of whom were randomly assigned (341 to the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 344 to the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group). 345 (50%) participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Median follow-up at the updated data cutoff was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-25·2) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 22·4 months (21·4-23·8) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. At the updated data cutoff, 248 (73%) participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 279 (81%) participants in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group had died (median overall survival 12·9 months [95% CI 11·6-14·1] vs 11·3 months [10·1-12·5]; hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·91]). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 24-month overall survival rates were 23·6% (95% CI 18·7-28·9) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 11·5% (7·6-16·2) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. Maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 250 (74%) of 338 participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 257 (75%) of 342 in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. The most common maximum grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (70 [21%] vs 86 [25%]), anaemia (64 [19%] vs 64 [19%]), and neutropenia (63 [19%] vs 68 [20%]). INTERPRETATION: Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed robust and sustained overall survival benefit with no new safety signals. Findings continue to support the regimen as a standard of care for people with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Dual encapsulation and sequential release of cisplatin and vitamin E from soy polysaccharides and ß-cyclodextrin bioadhesive hydrogel nanoparticles.

Chemically cross-linked hydrogel nanoparticles (HGNPs) offer enhanced properties over their physical counterparts, particularly in drug delivery and cell encapsulation. This study applied pH-thermal dual responsive bio-adhesive HGNPs for dual complexation and enhanced the controlled release and bioavailability of cisplatin (CDDP) and Vitamin E (VE) drugs. The CDDP was loaded into the HGNPs via chemical conjugation with the carboxyl groups in the HGNPs surface by soy polysaccharides (SSPS). At the same time, the host-guest interaction complexed the VE through the ß-cyclodextrin (ß-CD). The HGNPs showed a uniform HGNPs size distribution of 90.77 ± 14.77 nm and 81.425 ± 13.21 nm before and after complexation, respectively. The FTIR, XRD, XPS, and zeta potential confirmed the conjugation. The cumulative release percent of CDDP reached 98 % at pH 1.2, while <45 % was released at pH 7.4. Our HGNPs enhance the incorporation of CDDP by substituting its chlorides with carboxyl groups of the SSPS; the loading of CDDP and VE was 15 ± 0.33 and 11.32 ± 0.25 wt%, respectively. Moreover, the CDDP and VE also released slower from the HGNPs at 25 °C than at 37 °C and 42 °C. The (VE/CDDP)-loaded HGNPs exhibited longer circulation time in vivo than free CDDP and free VE suspension.

Camrelizumab-based induction chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma: phase II clinical trial.

This phase II trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of induction chemoimmunotherapy of camrelizumab plus modified TPF in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA HSCC) (NCT04156698). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), larynx preservation rate (LPR), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Patients (cT3-4aN0-2M0), regardless of sex, received induction chemoimmunotherapy for three cycles: camrelizumab 200 mg d1, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 d1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d1-3, and capecitabine 800 mg/m2 bid d1-14, q21d. Patients were assigned to radioimmunotherapy if they had a complete or partial response, those with stable or progressive disease underwent surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. Camrelizumab was maintained post-radioimmunotherapy. Fifty-one patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 23.7 months. After induction therapy, the ORR was 82.4% (42/51), meeting the prespecified endpoint. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 26 patients, and no treatment-related death occurred. As three-year outcomes were immature, two-year OS, PFS and LPR were reported. As no distant metastatic event had occurred, MFS was not reported here. The two-year OS, PFS, and LPR rates were 83.0%, 77.1%, and 70.0%, respectively. The induction chemoimmunotherapy of camrelizumab plus TPF showed a high ORR rate with an acceptable safety profile in LA HSCC.