Animal production, animal health and food safety: Gaps and challenges in the chilean industry.

This paper summarizes the gaps and challenges related to animal production, health, and food safety as discussed by a panel at the 1st International Symposium of Food Safety (ISFS) in Santiago, Chile, in December 2016. Participating representatives of academia, industry, and government and statements from the audience confirmed that food safety is essential for increasing food security. First, panelists identified the need for a science-based regulatory framework to implement effective regulations. Second, they highlighted the importance of a risk analysis framework to quantify the risk of the potential for antimicrobial resistance associated with the use of antimicrobials, and the need of studies to evaluate foodborne prevention/control strategies. Third, the challenges of filling the gaps between industry and academia were addressed, including examples of successful collaboration, opportunities, and weakness identified by industry. Finally, challenges in animal food production included issues related to changing consumer preferences, animal welfare, the use of antimicrobials, and sustainable animal production. The symposium provided a regional platform to share experiences from the implementation of methods and approaches for food safety. The roundtable successfully explored the future science and technology challenges that are of strategic importance for Chile and the region in animal health and food safety.

Welfare in pig housing - brazilian and portuguese legislation

The Animal welfare is conditional on well-planned and well-managed exploitation, since the management of the animals strongly influences their behavior, their productivity and, consequently, the yield and quality of the final product. In this study, an investigative review was carried out of the literature, governmental databases and main institutions relating to animal welfare, seeking to highlight and discuss differences in legislation between Brazil and Portugal, in view of the interest and concern of the scientific community and the consumer market in relation to methods used for animal production. In Brazil, there is no specific legislation on the welfare of pigs and other related legislation is used as a basis. However, Portugal has more specific legislation on the subject. Considering the dissemination of knowledge and the growing concern with animal welfare in the European consumer market, it is noted that the need for its application standards that ensure animal welfare in production/breeding, possibly becoming a basic requirement in the coming years. However, Brazilian pig farms, like all other animal production activities, are still lacking specific legislation that is appropriate for Brazil, which ends up delaying the effective practice of welfare in productions, abstaining from the population of information about the activity. New studies are needed to ascertain the necessity and applicability of the legislation, and whether the legislation is effective in improving animal welfare or serves only to increase bureaucracy.

Welfare in pig housing - brazilian and portuguese legislation

The Animal welfare is conditional on well-planned and well-managed exploitation, since the management of the animals strongly influences their behavior, their productivity and, consequently, the yield and quality of the final product. In this study, an investigative review was carried out of the literature, governmental databases and main institutions relating to animal welfare, seeking to highlight and discuss differences in legislation between Brazil and Portugal, in view of the interest and concern of the scientific community and the consumer market in relation to methods used for animal production. In Brazil, there is no specific legislation on the welfare of pigs and other related legislation is used as a basis. However, Portugal has more specific legislation on the subject. Considering the dissemination of knowledge and the growing concern with animal welfare in the European consumer market, it is noted that the need for its application standards that ensure animal welfare in production/breeding, possibly becoming a basic requirement in the coming years. However, Brazilian pig farms, like all other animal production activities, are still lacking specific legislation that is appropriate for Brazil, which ends up delaying the effective practice of welfare in productions, abstaining from the population of information about the activity. New studies are needed to ascertain the necessity and applicability of the legislation, and whether the legislation is effective in improving animal welfare or serves only to increase bureaucracy.(AU)

Desafio da Pecuária na Amazônia frente ao novo código florestal brasileiro / Challenge of Livestock in the Amazon in front of the new Brazilian forest law

O rebanho bovino brasileiro no período de 1975 a 2017 passou de 101.673.753 para 171.858.168 de animais, o que representa um crescimento de 69%, sendo que 77% desse crescimento ocorreu na Amazônia, onde no mesmo período, o rebanho cresceu 1.066%. Mas, a derrubada da floresta cresceu na mesma proporção colocando a região no centro das discussões nacionais e internacionais em relação ao meio ambiente. Em 2012 foi aprovado o novo código florestal o qual determina que na Amazônia deve ser preservado 80% da área da propriedade como reserva legal (RL), restando 20% a ser explorado economicamente. Apesar da questão ambiental, é inegável que a pecuária colocou a região dentro do contexto econômico nacional. Portanto, o desafio é: é possível manter o desenvolvimento da pecuária na Amazônia de forma sustentável, dentro da concepção da nova lei? É dentro desse contexto que abordaremos de forma superficial essa grande questão, na certeza de que para respondê-la precisará de um profundo debate pela sociedade.

The Brazilian cattle herd in between 1975 and 2017 rose from 101,673,753 to 171,858,168 of animals, representing a growth of 69%, of which 77% of this growth occurred in the Amazon, where in the same period the herd grew 1.066%. However, the deforestation has grown at the same rate, putting the region at the center of national and international environmental discussions. In 2012 it was approved the new forest law that states that 80% of the property area must be kept as legal reserve (RL), whereas only 20% remaining economically exploitable. Despite the environmental issue, it is undeniable that livestock farming has placed the region within the national economic context. So the challenge is: Is it possible to sustainably maintain the livestock development in the Amazon region? It is within this context that we will superficially address this great question, in the certainty that in order to answer it, it will require a deep debate by society.

Desafio da Pecuária na Amazônia frente ao novo código florestal brasileiro / Challenge of Livestock in the Amazon in front of the new Brazilian forest law

O rebanho bovino brasileiro no período de 1975 a 2017 passou de 101.673.753 para 171.858.168 de animais, o que representa um crescimento de 69%, sendo que 77% desse crescimento ocorreu na Amazônia, onde no mesmo período, o rebanho cresceu 1.066%. Mas, a derrubada da floresta cresceu na mesma proporção colocando a região no centro das discussões nacionais e internacionais em relação ao meio ambiente. Em 2012 foi aprovado o novo código florestal o qual determina que na Amazônia deve ser preservado 80% da área da propriedade como reserva legal (RL), restando 20% a ser explorado economicamente. Apesar da questão ambiental, é inegável que a pecuária colocou a região dentro do contexto econômico nacional. Portanto, o desafio é: é possível manter o desenvolvimento da pecuária na Amazônia de forma sustentável, dentro da concepção da nova lei? É dentro desse contexto que abordaremos de forma superficial essa grande questão, na certeza de que para respondê-la precisará de um profundo debate pela sociedade.(AU)

The Brazilian cattle herd in between 1975 and 2017 rose from 101,673,753 to 171,858,168 of animals, representing a growth of 69%, of which 77% of this growth occurred in the Amazon, where in the same period the herd grew 1.066%. However, the deforestation has grown at the same rate, putting the region at the center of national and international environmental discussions. In 2012 it was approved the new forest law that states that 80% of the property area must be kept as legal reserve (RL), whereas only 20% remaining economically exploitable. Despite the environmental issue, it is undeniable that livestock farming has placed the region within the national economic context. So the challenge is: Is it possible to sustainably maintain the livestock development in the Amazon region? It is within this context that we will superficially address this great question, in the certainty that in order to answer it, it will require a deep debate by society.(AU)

Comparison of national and international standards of good egg production practices

Egg production is an important economic activity in Brazil, with about 697 million eggs produced annually. The conventional cage system is commonly used for egg production. However, there has been a growing concern for the welfare of laying hens around the world. In this context, many countries have issued laws, protocols, and other normative technical specifications to ensure the welfare of layers. This study aims at identifying similarities and differences between international standards and Brazilian protocols using the Comparative Law perspective. This article reports an analytical study of selected protocols, performing three analyses using the Comparative Law method. The research concludes that some items of the Brazilian protocols of good egg production practices, such as farm inspection, treatment of diseases, temperature, ventilation, beak trimming, feed and water supply, correspond to international specifications, whereas others, such as housing, freedom movement, use of equipment, and transport, are less strict.

Comparison of national and international standards of good egg production practices

Egg production is an important economic activity in Brazil, with about 697 million eggs produced annually. The conventional cage system is commonly used for egg production. However, there has been a growing concern for the welfare of laying hens around the world. In this context, many countries have issued laws, protocols, and other normative technical specifications to ensure the welfare of layers. This study aims at identifying similarities and differences between international standards and Brazilian protocols using the Comparative Law perspective. This article reports an analytical study of selected protocols, performing three analyses using the Comparative Law method. The research concludes that some items of the Brazilian protocols of good egg production practices, such as farm inspection, treatment of diseases, temperature, ventilation, beak trimming, feed and water supply, correspond to international specifications, whereas others, such as housing, freedom movement, use of equipment, and transport, are less strict.(AU)

Vantagens e desvantagens da pecuária no Brasil segundo atores da cadeia produtiva de carne bovina / Advantages and disadvantages of livestock farming in Brazil, according to beef chain actors

Este estudo objetivou identificar as vantagens e desvantagens de se produzir carne bovina para o mercado doméstico epara exportação, segundo a percepção dos atores da cadeia produtiva no Brasil. Para tanto, foi utilizada a metodologiaqualiquantitativa do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo, ferramenta que possibilita representar a opinião coletiva sobre um dadotema. A pesquisa de campo baseou-se em uma amostra de trinta e quatro indivíduos, de ambos os sexos, em sua maioriacom alto grau de escolaridade, pertencentes a cinco diferentes categorias de atores relacionadas à atividade pecuáriade corte no Brasil: pecuaristas, frigoríficos, empresas certificadoras, associações de classe e órgãos governamentais deregulação e inspeção. Os resultados indicaram que os pecuaristas percebem mais desvantagens do que vantagens em seproduzir carne bovina para exportação, especialmente pelo fato de que são os frigoríficos que estabelecem os preços nastransações domésticas. Além disso, sugerem também que a carne bovina brasileira destinada ao mercado doméstico é piordo que aquela destinada à exportação, reconhecendo-se também a segmentação do mercado interno, com exigências dequalidade diferenciadas.

This study aimed at identifying the advantages and disadvantages of beef production for the domestic market and for exportaccording to the perception of the production chain actors in Brazil. For that purpose, the qualiquantitative methodologyof the Collective Subject Discourse was used. This tool allows the representation of a collective opinion about a specificsubject. The field survey sample was composed of thirty-four individuals, both male and female, most of them with higheducation background, belonging to five different actor categories related to cattle growing in Brazil: farmers, slaughterhouses, certifying companies, class associations and regulatory governmental entities. The results indicated that farmersperceive more disadvantages than advantages in producing beef for export, especially due to the fact that the slaughterhouses establish the prices in the domestic transactions. Besides that, the results suggest that the Brazilian beef for thedomestic market is worse than that for export. A segmentation of the domestic market is also known, with differentiatedquality requirement.

Wild birds as pets in Campina Grande, Paraíba State, Brazil: an ethnozoological approach.

Birds are one of the animals most widely used by humans and are highly valued as pets. The present work reports the use of wild birds as pets in the city of Campina Grande, Paraíba State (PB), Brazil. The owners' choice and perceptions of the species ecology was assessed as well. The methodology employed included unstructured and semi-structured interviews, guided tours and direct observations. A total of 26 bird species distributed among ten families and four orders were identified. The most frequently encountered order was Passeriformes (76.9%), with a predominance of the family Emberizidae (34.6%). The specimens kept as pets were principally obtained in public markets or between the breeders themselves. The popularity of birds as pets, compounded by the inefficiency of official controls over the commerce of wild animals has stimulated the illegal capture and breeding of wild birds in Campina Grande.

Manejo y cuidado responsable de perros: tránsito y permanencia en la vía pública

El manejo responsable de perros y mascotas implica ciertas normas sobre su tránsito y permanencia en el espacio público, así como normas que deben cumplir propietarios, tenedores o paseadores. Estos últimos deben inscribirse en el nuevo registro creado por el Gobierno de la Ciudad, por lo que se incluyen los requisitos de inscripción

Manejo y cuidado responsable de perros: tránsito y permanencia en la vía pública

El manejo responsable de perros y mascotas implica ciertas normas sobre su tránsito y permanencia en el espacio público, así como normas que deben cumplir propietarios, tenedores o paseadores. Estos últimos deben inscribirse en el nuevo registro creado por el Gobierno de la Ciudad, por lo que se incluyen los requisitos de inscripción