Core socioDemographic data variables in ICU Trials (CoDe-IT): a protocol for generating core data variables using a Delphi consensus process.

INTRODUCTION: Sociodemographic variables influence health outcomes, either directly (ie, gender identity) or indirectly (eg, structural/systemic racism based on ethnoracial group). Identification of how sociodemographic variables can impact the health of critically ill adults is important to guide care and research design for this population. However, despite the growing recognition of the importance of collecting sociodemographic measures that influence health outcomes, insufficient and inconsistent data collection of sociodemographic variables persists in critical care studies. We aim to develop a set of core data variables (CoDaV) for social determinants of health specific to studies involving critically ill adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review to generate a list of possible sociodemographic measures to be used for round 1 of the modified Delphi processes. We will engage relevant knowledge users (previous intensive care unit patients and family members, critical care researchers, critical care clinicians and research co-ordinators) to participate in the modified Delphi consensus survey to identify the CoDaV. A final consensus meeting will be held with knowledge user representatives to discuss the final CoDaV, how each sociodemographic variable will be collected (eg, level of granularity) and how to disseminate the CoDaV for use in critical care studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Calgary conjoint health research ethics board has approved this study protocol (REB22-1648).

Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Guideline for the Prevention of Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Adults.

RATIONALE: Critically ill adults can develop stress-related mucosal damage from gastrointestinal hypoperfusion and reperfusion injury, predisposing them to clinically important stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of UGIB in adults in the ICU. DESIGN: A multiprofessional panel of 18 international experts from dietetics, critical care medicine, nursing, and pharmacy, and two methodologists developed evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Conflict-of-interest policies were strictly followed during all phases of guideline development including task force selection and voting. METHODS: The panel members identified and formulated 13 Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. We conducted a systematic review for each question to identify the best available evidence, statistically analyzed the evidence, and then assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate the recommendations. Good practice statements were included to provide additional guidance. RESULTS: The panel generated nine conditional recommendations and made four good practice statements. Factors that likely increase the risk for clinically important stress-related UGIB in critically ill adults include coagulopathy, shock, and chronic liver disease. There is no firm evidence for mechanical ventilation alone being a risk factor. Enteral nutrition probably reduces UGIB risk. All critically ill adults with factors that likely increase the risk for stress-related UGIB should receive either proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists, at low dosage regimens, to prevent UGIB. Prophylaxis should be discontinued when critical illness is no longer evident or the risk factor(s) is no longer present despite ongoing critical illness. Discontinuation of stress ulcer prophylaxis before transfer out of the ICU is necessary to prevent inappropriate prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline panel achieved consensus regarding the recommendations for the prevention of stress-related UGIB. These recommendations are intended for consideration along with the patient's existing clinical status.

[Recommendations of the new S1 guidelines on airway management]. / Empfehlungen zur neuen S1-Leitlinie Atemwegsmanagement.

The German guidelines for airway management aim to optimize the care of patients undergoing anesthesia or intensive care. The preanesthesia evaluation is an important component for detection of anatomical and physiological indications for difficult mask ventilation and intubation. If predictors for a difficult or impossible mask ventilation and/or endotracheal intubation are present the airway should be secured while maintaining spontaneous breathing. In an unexpectedly difficult intubation, attempts to secure the airway should be limited to two with each method used. A video laryngoscope is recommended after an unsuccessful direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, a video laryngoscope should be available at every anesthesiology workspace throughout the hospital. Securing the airway should primarily be performed with a video laryngoscope in critically ill patients and patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration. Experienced personnel should perform or supervise airway management in the intensive care unit.

Sustainability of the Subspecialty of Anesthesiology Critical Care: An Expert Consensus and Review of the Literature.

While considerable literature exists with respect to clinical aspects of critical care anesthesiology (CCA) practice, few publications have focused on how anesthesiology-based critical care practices are organized and the challenges associated with the administration and management of anesthesiology critical care units. Currently, numerous challenges are affecting the sustainability of CCA practice, including decreased applications to fellowship positions and decreased reimbursement for critical care work. This review describes what is known about the subspecialty of CCA and leverages the experience of administrative leaders in adult critical care anesthesiologists in the United States to describe potential solutions.

Prognostication in Neurocritical Care.

OBJECTIVE: This article synthesizes the current literature on prognostication in neurocritical care, identifies existing challenges, and proposes future research directions to reduce variability and enhance scientific and patient-centered approaches to neuroprognostication. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Patients with severe acute brain injury often lack the capacity to make their own medical decisions, leaving surrogate decision makers responsible for life-or-death choices. These decisions heavily rely on clinicians' prognostication, which is still considered an art because of the previous lack of specific guidelines. Consequently, there is significant variability in neuroprognostication practices. This article examines various aspects of neuroprognostication. It explores the cognitive approach to prognostication, highlights the use of statistical modeling such as Bayesian models and machine learning, emphasizes the importance of clinician-family communication during prognostic disclosures, and proposes shared decision making for more patient-centered care. ESSENTIAL POINTS: This article identifies ongoing challenges in the field and emphasizes the need for future research to ameliorate variability in neuroprognostication. By focusing on scientific methodologies and patient-centered approaches, this research aims to provide guidance and tools that may enhance neuroprognostication in neurocritical care.

Quality Improvement in an Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit Through Pain Assessment and Control.

The aim of the study is to determine whether the assessment of postoperative pain and timely measures to control it improve the quality of medical care in intensive care units (ICUs). To develop an improvement model with a focus on pain assessment and control. 151 patients were included in the study, divided into two groups: a retrospective group (RG)-60 patients and a prospective group (PG)-91 patients. A multimodal approach to pain control was applied to all patients. We administered the Critical Care Pain Observational Tool (CPOT) to PG upon admission to the ICU. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment was used in all non intubated patients in 6 hours intervals. In the PG, а model for improvement was applied using a PDSA (Plan, Do, Study/ Check, Act) cycle. The following indicators have been used: process, outcome, and balancing indicators. A survey of the PG was also conducted. The developed Model of improvement increased the VAS score reporting success rate from 40 to 95%, which allowed significantly better pain control. In PG the registered CPOT score was 1.71 ± 0.73. 90% of patients in PG have an average VAS score below 5 after the improvement model, while in RG-50% of patients, which is statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in balancing indicators between the two groups. Conclusion: The conducted survey confirmed the positive effect of the model. Quality improvement in the ICU depends on accurate assessment of postoperative pain and timely and adequate treatment.

Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: The Standard of Care.

Intensive care unit-based palliative care has evolved over the past 30 years due to the efforts of clinicians, researchers, and advocates for patient-centered care. Although all critically ill patients inherently have palliative care needs, the path was not linear but rather filled with the challenges of blending the intensive care unit goals of aggressive treatment and cure with the palliative care goals of symptom management and quality of life. Today, palliative care is considered an essential component of high-quality critical care and a core competency of all critical care nurses, advanced practice nurses, and other intensive care unit clinicians. This article provides an overview of the current state of intensive care unit-based palliative care, examines how the barriers to such care have shifted, reviews primary and specialist palliative care, addresses the impact of COVID-19, and presents resources to help nurses and intensive care unit teams achieve optimal outcomes.

Selection of knowledge translation strategies to implement best practices on nonpharmacological prevention of delirium in intensive care unit / Sélection de stratégies de transfert des connaissances visant à implanter les pratiques recommandées de prévention non pharmacologiques du délirium en soins intensifs.

Background: Delirium prevention in the ICU should focus on a non-pharmacological approach. However, these recommendations are not always applied by care providers. Objective: To select knowledge translation strategies to facilitate the implementation of non-pharmacological best practices to prevent delirium in the ICU. Method: A consensus study was conducted. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nonpharmacological methods, and knowledge translation strategies, were identified in two nominal groups. A context assessment was also carried out. Nine professionals and one patient-partner participated. Results: The barriers and facilitators on which consensus was reached were most frequently related to environmental context and resources, intention, and knowledge. The areas of organizational context with the highest levels of agreement were interpersonal relations, culture and leadership. Consequently, knowledge translation strategies were selected to facilitate practices, as well as to modify the environment and improve knowledge. Conclusion: A structured method was used during this study to guide the selection of knowledge translation strategies. The application of these strategies could potentially improve clinical practice in intensive care.

Introduction: La prévention du délirium aux soins intensifs devrait être axée sur les méthodes non pharmacologiques. Toutefois, ce type de recommandation n'est pas toujours appliqué. Objectif: Sélectionner des stratégies de transfert des connaissances afin de faciliter l'implantation des pratiques non pharmacologiques pouvant prévenir le délirium en soins intensifs. Méthode: Une étude de consensus a été réalisée autour de deux thèmes. Deux groupes nominaux ont été constitués pour identifier les barrières et les facilitateurs à l'implantation des méthodes et les stratégies de transfert des connaissances. Une évaluation du contexte a aussi été réalisée. Neuf professionnels et une patiente-partenaire ont participé. Résultats: Les barrières et les facilitateurs ayant fait l'objet d'un consensus étaient plus fréquemment reliés au contexte environnemental et aux ressources, à l'intention et aux connaissances. Les domaines du contexte organisationnel qui ont obtenu le plus haut niveau d'accord sont les relations interpersonnelles, la culture et le leadership. Conséquemment, des stratégies de transfert des connaissances pour faciliter les pratiques, modifier l'environnement et améliorer les connaissances ont été sélectionnées. Conclusion: Une méthode structurée a été utilisée afin de guider la sélection de stratégies de transfert des connaissances. L'application de ces stratégies pourrait potentiellement améliorer la pratique clinique en soins intensifs.

Beyond the obstacles : diving into the heart of interventions promoting the involvement of relatives in intensive care unit / Au-delà des obstacles : plonger au cœur des interventions favorisant l'implication des proches aux soins intensifs.

Background: Involving family caregivers in direct care in the intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as part of best care practices. However, little is known about the factors that foster this involvement. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the factors in the literature that promote or limit the involvement of family caregivers in direct care in adult intensive care units. Method: A rapid literature review was conducted in MEDLINE and CINAHL for English-and French-language articles published between 2010 and 2021. Results: 25 articles were selected (n=20 primary studies, n=5 literature syntheses). The results show a diversity of factors that influence the involvement of relatives in direct intensive care units. These factors can be grouped into four categories : relational, informal, clinical, and political. Conclusion: This review identifies the organizational, clinical and human issues relating to the involvement of family caregivers in direct care in order to propose recommendations to facilitate the implementation of this approach in the intensive care units.

Contexte: L'implication des proches aidants dans les soins directs à l'unité des soins intensifs est de plus en plus reconnue comme faisant partie des meilleures pratiques de soins. Toutefois, les facteurs permettant de favoriser cet engagement sont peu connus. Objectifs: Cette étude vise à identifier dans la littérature les facteurs favorables ou limitant l'implication des proches aidants dans les soins directs dans les unités des soins intensifs adultes, et à proposer des recommandations pour favoriser cette implication. Méthode: Une revue rapide des écrits a été réalisée dans MEDLINE et CINAHL afin d'étudier les articles publiés entre 2010 et 2021 en français ou en anglais. Résultats: Au total, 25 articles ont été retenus (n = 20 études primaires, n = 5 synthèses des connaissances). Conclusion: Cette revue permet d'identifier les enjeux organisationnels, cliniques et humains relatifs à l'implication des PA dans les soins directs afin de proposer des recommandations pour faciliter l'implantation de cette approche dans les unités des soins intensifs.

Update in Pediatric Neurocritical Care: What a Neurologist Caring for Critically Ill Children Needs to Know.

Currently nearly one-quarter of admissions to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) worldwide are for neurocritical care diagnoses that are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pediatric neurocritical care is a rapidly evolving field with unique challenges due to not only age-related responses to primary neurologic insults and their treatments but also the rarity of pediatric neurocritical care conditions at any given institution. The structure of pediatric neurocritical care services therefore is most commonly a collaborative model where critical care medicine physicians coordinate care and are supported by a multidisciplinary team of pediatric subspecialists, including neurologists. While pediatric neurocritical care lies at the intersection between critical care and the neurosciences, this narrative review focuses on the most common clinical scenarios encountered by pediatric neurologists as consultants in the PICU and synthesizes the recent evidence, best practices, and ongoing research in these cases. We provide an in-depth review of (1) the evaluation and management of abnormal movements (seizures/status epilepticus and status dystonicus); (2) acute weakness and paralysis (focusing on pediatric stroke and select pediatric neuroimmune conditions); (3) neuromonitoring modalities using a pathophysiology-driven approach; (4) neuroprotective strategies for which there is evidence (e.g., pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, post-cardiac arrest care, and ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke); and (5) best practices for neuroprognostication in pediatric traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrest, and disorders of consciousness, with highlights of the 2023 updates on Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria. Our review of the current state of pediatric neurocritical care from the viewpoint of what a pediatric neurologist in the PICU needs to know is intended to improve knowledge for providers at the bedside with the goal of better patient care and outcomes.