RESUMEN
Involuntary job loss during the COVID-19 pandemic adds challenges, especially for custodial grandparents that are taking care of grandchildren. Grandparents are relatively vulnerable, and they need more attention and support when facing the negative impacts of COVID-19. This study analyzed cross-sectional survey data collected from 234 custodial grandparents via Qualtrics Panels in June 2020 in the United States. After using the propensity score weighting adjustment, results from logistic and ordinary least squares regression showed that compared with grandparents that did not lose their job during the pandemic, grandparents that did had more parenting stress and worse mental health. Moderation analysis also showed that social support was a significant moderator of the relationship between job loss and mental health, but not the relationship between job loss and parenting stress. The findings and implications are discussed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Custodia del Niño , Abuelos/psicología , Salud Mental , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Estrés Psicológico , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Niño , Custodia del Niño/economía , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Intergeneracionales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Funcionamiento Psicosocial , Apoyo Social , Estrés Psicológico/economía , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Desempleo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Objectives. To examine the extent to which differences in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in pregnancy and infant neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes are associated with maternal race/ethnicity.Methods. We performed a secondary analysis of a statewide quality improvement database of opioid-exposed deliveries from January 2017 to April 2019 from 24 hospitals in Massachusetts. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to model the association between maternal race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or Hispanic) and prenatal receipt of MOUD, NOWS severity, early intervention referral, and biological parental custody at discharge.Results. Among 1710 deliveries to women with opioid use disorder, 89.3% (n = 1527) were non-Hispanic White. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black women (AOR = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18, 0.66) and Hispanic women (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.27, 0.68) were less likely to receive MOUD during pregnancy compared with non-Hispanic White women. We found no statistically significant associations between maternal race/ethnicity and infant outcomes.Conclusions. We identified significant racial/ethnic differences in MOUD prenatal receipt that persisted in adjusted models. Research should focus on the perspectives and treatment experiences of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women to ensure equitable care for all mother-infant dyads.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Embarazo , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The present study is the largest and most rigorous study to date on the effects of being appointed a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) on permanency outcomes of children in foster care. The intent-to-treat study accounts for selection bias by applying inverse probability weighting to logistic and sequential logistic regressions in a large sample of children in foster care in the state of Texas (N = 31,754). Overall, children appointed a CASA have significantly lower odds than children without a CASA of achieving permanency. They have lower odds of being reunified, greater odds of being adopted (if not reunified), and lower odds of being placed in permanent kin guardianship (if not reunified or adopted) than children who are not appointed CASA. This study makes an additional contribution by looking beyond the aggregate effect of CASA on permanency by examining the effect of CASA for different age groups and different types of first placement after removal.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Protección Infantil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Protección a la Infancia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adopción/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Protección Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Protección a la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Servicio Social/legislación & jurisprudencia , TexasRESUMEN
Background: Parental separation is a stressful experience that can lead to parents suffering mental health problems (MHPs). Parental separation education programs for coping with post-separation adjustment have proven to be effective in reducing conflict and improving co-parenting. However, the effects of these programs on MHPs have not been assessed. A field study was carried out to assess the impact of a parental separation education program on parental MHPs. Method: A total of 116 separated parents who completed the program "Parental separation, not family breakdown" completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) pre- and post-intervention. Results: Separated parents had significantly higher pre-intervention scores on the nine symptom dimensions and the global indexes of distress in comparison to the normative population. The intervention yielded a significant improvement (i.e., reduction of clinical symptoms) in all MHPs, ranging from 19% in phobic anxiety to 36% in depression and general anxiety; and in the global indexes of distress (36% in the global severity index; 28% in the positive symptom distress index; and 33% in the positive symptom total). Approximately 45% of parents significantly improved through the intervention. Conclusions: The implications of the outcomes of the separation and intervention in parents MHPs and children wellbeing are discussed
Antecedentes: la ruptura de pareja, como evento estresante, puede derivar en Problemas en la Salud Mental (PSM) de los progenitores. Para afrontar esta contingencia se han desarrollado programas educativos que han mostrado su eficacia en la reducción del conflicto y la mejora de la coparentalidad. Pero los efectos en los PSMs no han sido estudiados. Así, nos planteamos un estudio campo para conocer los efectos de un programa educativo para la ruptura de pareja en los PSMs. Método: 116 progenitores separados que cumplimentaron el programa "Ruptura de Pareja, no de Familia" respondieron, pre- y post-intervención, al Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Resultados: los resultados mostraron, en contraste con la población normativa, que los progenitores separados puntuaban significativamente más alto en los PSMs. La intervención implicó una mejora significativa en todos PSMs, oscilando desde el 19% en ansiedad fóbica al 36% en depresión y ansiedad generalizada, así como en los índices generales de malestar (36% en el Índice de Severidad Global; 28% en el Índice de Malestar referido a Síntomas Positivos; y el 33% en el Total de Síntomas Positivos). Conclusiones: se discuten las implicaciones de los resultados de la ruptura e intervención en los PSMs de los padres separados y el bienestar de los hijos
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adaptación Psicológica , Estado Civil , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Padres/educación , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Salud Mental/educación , Padres/psicología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores Sexuales , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parental separation is a stressful experience that can lead to parents suffering mental health problems (MHPs). Parental separation education programs for coping with post-separation adjustment have proven to be effective in reducing conflict and improving co-parenting. However, the effects of these programs on MHPs have not been assessed. A field study was carried out to assess the impact of a parental separation education program on parental MHPs. METHOD: A total of 116 separated parents who completed the program "Parental separation, not family breakdown" completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Separated parents had significantly higher pre-intervention scores on the nine symptom dimensions and the global indexes of distress in comparison to the normative population. The intervention yielded a significant improvement (i.e., reduction of clinical symptoms) in all MHPs, ranging from 19% in phobic anxiety to 36% in depression and general anxiety; and in the global indexes of distress (36% in the global severity index; 28% in the positive symptom distress index; and 33% in the positive symptom total). Approximately 45% of parents significantly improved through the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The implications of the outcomes of the separation and intervention in parents' MHPs and children wellbeing are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Estado Civil , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Padres/educación , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Salud Mental/educación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Padres/psicología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores Sexuales , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: The numbers of children in conflict with the law continue to rise in Asia, yet few studies have been conducted regarding factors associated with it. It has been theorized that children with conduct disorder represent majority of children in conflict with the law, and that poor moral competence mediates the association between conduct disorder and antisocial behavior. This study aimed to present a profile of Filipino children in conflict with the law, determine the prevalence of conduct disorder in the sample, and investigate variables associated with conduct disorder. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a conflict with the law Custodial Care Center in the Philippines. The procedure entailed a diagnostic interview and questionnaire administration conducted by psychiatrists. Questionnaires administered included the Moral Competence Test and Parental Warmth and Acceptance Scale. Statistical analyses of data included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and independent t tests. SPSS v.23.0 was used for data encoding and analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three participants were included in the study, with 10 participants with conduct disorder and 13 controls. Majority were male adolescents between the ages of 16 and 18 years. Conduct disorder was associated with commission of multiple violations, particularly theft and homicide, the presence of a substance use disorder, and a history of abuse. Participants with conduct disorder had lower moral competence levels compared to participants without conduct disorder. CONCLUSION: Conduct disorder was associated with high-risk antisocial behavior and lower levels of moral competence.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno de la Conducta/epidemiología , Conducta Criminal , Condición Moral , Adolescente , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/psicología , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno de la Conducta/psicología , Criminales/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Familiares , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desarrollo Moral , FilipinasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about risk of custody loss or out-of-home placement among children whose mothers experience postpartum mental disorders, and whether this risk differs from that of children whose mothers had earlier onset of their mental disorder. METHODS: National Danish registers comprising 1 868 467 births (1982-2012) were used to determine how the timing of maternal illness onset influences out-of-home placement risk up to age 18 years among children exposed to a maternal mental disorder. RESULTS: Compared to children unexposed to maternal mental illness, risk was higher for children exposed to a maternal mental disorder whose mothers had a first contact for a mental disorder in the 0-12 months of predelivery (8.17/1000 person-years; aIRR 4.56, 95% CI 4.08-5.09), the first 3 months postpartum (4.60/1000 person-years; 3.55, 2.95-4.26) and 4-12 months postpartum (6.49/1000 person-years; 3.93, 3.50-4.41). Risk was even higher for children exposed to a maternal mental disorder when illness onset was more than 1-year predelivery (9.11/1000 person-years; 5.48, 5.32-5.66). CONCLUSION: Risk of out-home placement in children exposed to mothers with a new-onset postpartum mental disorder is almost as high as in children whose mothers have long-standing illness. A better understanding of the trajectories of these mothers and children is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Puerperales/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The study examines and evaluates the effectiveness of a federal and county collaboration in Pennsylvania designed to help military veterans with child support arrearages in the criminal justice system. The study focused on the veteran participants (n=232) identified psychosocial problems, their range of justice involvement, strategies to mitigate, address barriers and legal dilemmas through the collaborative. The average age 40, majority male, Caucasian, divorced, enrolled in Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare, serving on supervised parole or probation, homeless episodes, and income <$500.00 per month. In general, the findings enhance the limited body of knowledge about military-veteran child support and provide strategies and specific insight into the problems veterans face on individual, familial, and societal levels.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/organización & administración , Derecho Penal/organización & administración , Servicio Social/organización & administración , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Cooperativa , Derecho Penal/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Rol Profesional , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare mental illness diagnoses and treatment use among mothers who lost custody of their child through involvement with child protection services and those seen in mothers dealing with the death of a child. METHODS: We studied mental health outcomes of a cohort of women whose first child was born in Manitoba, Canada between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2015. Of these women, 5,792 had a child taken into care, and 1,143 mothers experienced the death of a child (<18 y old) before 31 March 2015. Adjusted relative rates (ARR) of 3 mental health diagnoses and 3 mental health treatment use outcomes between these 2 groups were examined. RESULTS: Mothers with a child taken into care had significantly greater ARR of depression (ARR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.82 to 1.98), anxiety (ARR = 2.51; 95% CI, 2.40 to 2.63), substance use (ARR = 8.54; 95% CI, 7.49 to 9.74), physician visits for mental illness (ARR = 3.01; 95% CI, 2.91 to 3.12), and psychotropic medication use (ARR = 4.95; 95% CI, 4.85 to 5.06) in the years after custody loss compared with mothers who experienced the death of a child. CONCLUSION: Losing custody of a child to child protection services is associated with significantly worse maternal mental health than experiencing the death of a child. Greater acknowledgement and supportive services should be provided to mothers experiencing the loss of a child through the involvement of child protection services.
Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Protección Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Muerte , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Manitoba/epidemiología , Registro Médico Coordinado , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The objective of this study is to determine which maternal events and diagnoses in the two years before childbirth are associated with higher risk for having a first child taken into care at birth by child protection services. A population-based retrospective cohort of women whose first child was born in Manitoba, Canada between 2002 and 2012 and lived in the province at least two years before the birth of their first child (n=53,565) was created using linkable administrative data. A logistic regression model determined the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of having a child taken into care at birth. Characteristics having the strongest association with a woman's first child being taken into care at birth were mother being in care at the birth of her child (AOR=11.10; 95% CI=8.38-14.71), substance abuse (AOR=8.94; 95% CI=5.08-15.71), schizophrenia (AOR=6.69; 95% CI=3.89-11.52) developmental disability (AOR=6.45; 95% CI=2.69-14.29), and no prenatal care (AOR=5.47; 95% CI=3.56-8.41). Most characteristics of women deemed to be at high risk for having their child taken into care at birth are modifiable or could be mitigated with appropriate services.
Asunto(s)
Orden de Nacimiento , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Protección Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Niño , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Manitoba/epidemiología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Preconceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Over the past two decades there has been a rapid increase in the number of children and youth living in guardianship and adoptive homes who were previously in foster care. Further, previous studies compared outcomes for children in guardianship homes to those for children in adoptive homes, despite the fact that many factors likely affect the selection of foster youth into different types of permanent placements. This study examined two counterfactuals for guardianship as a permanent placement type: adoption only and adoption or long-term-fostercare (A+LTFC). Longitudinal outcomes were tracked for children who exited foster care with relatives through guardianship (N=4,884) or adoption (N=12,163), as well as children in long-term foster care with relatives (N=4,840). Propensity scores were used to match children on key indicators. In the matched sample of guardianship versus adoption cases only, children who exited to guardianship were more likely to experience discontinuity than children who exited through adoption, 11% vs. 6% respectively. However, when guardianship was compared to the combination of adoption or long-term foster care, children in guardianship experienced the same proportion of discontinuity, 11% vs. 11% respectively. These results suggest that simply matching guardianship to adoption without taking into account LTFC may be the wrong way to estimate the "what if" counterfactual if children were not discharged to guardianship. Findings also support the use of guardianship as a potential solution for children in LTFC whose caregivers are not planning to adopt.
Asunto(s)
Adopción/psicología , Custodia del Niño , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/psicología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/psicología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Protección a la Infancia/psicología , Protección a la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Femenino , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores Sexuales , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Parental support has been shown to be important for children's self-esteem, which in turn is related to later important life outcomes. Today, an increasing number of children in the Western world spend time in both the parents' respective households after a separation. Children who live with both parents report more parental support than children who live only with one parent after a divorce. We took the opportunity of the commonness of children sharing their time between their parents' homes in Sweden to investigate children's self-esteem in relation to family type. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With nationally representative survey data (ULF) collected from both parents and children, we analyze differences in children's self-esteem among 4823 10-18 year olds in nuclear families, joint physical custody and those living mostly or only with one parent after a separation using ordinary least squares regression, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in self-esteem between children who lived equally much with both parents, mostly with one parent and those in nuclear families, whereas children in single care showed lower self-esteem compared with children in the other living arrangements. The difference was not explained by socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION: The self-esteem of children who share their time between their parent's respective homes after a separation does not deviate from that in their peers in nuclear families. Instead, those in single care reported lower self-esteem than those in the other living arrangements. These differences were not explained by socioeconomic factors. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish pre- and post-separation family characteristics that influence self-esteem and well-being in young people.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoimagen , Adolescente , Niño , Divorcio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Socioeconómicos , SueciaRESUMEN
If a case of physical child abuse is suspected in Germany, the general feeling is often that "it does not matter whether you make a report or not" because, generally, no conviction is made anyway. This study investigates the juridical analysis of complaint cases of physical child abuse [criminal complaint parag. 225 StGB (German penal code) with filial victim]. It focuses on the doctor's role and the impact of their practice in relation to a later conviction. It is based on the analysis of 302 files of the enquiry from 2004-2009 from the department of public prosecution in Cologne, Germany. Besides general epidemiological data on the reporting person, the affected child and the presumed offender, the documents were reassessed for the relevance of medical reports for successful convictions. Only 7% (n = 21) of 302 complaints led to a conviction. In 38.1% (n = 8) of those cases, a medical report was mentioned as a piece of evidence, and just in two cases a (legal) medical report was quoted and mentioned as relevant for the conviction. 50% of the complaint cases with legal medical expertise led to a trial. In contrast, only 30.2% with a common medical report and 7.3% without a report led to a trial. The results show how a medical report existed in only a few cases. In those cases, the rate of performed trials was higher than for those without a medical report, but the report played a minor part when reasoning a verdict.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/legislación & jurisprudencia , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Rol del Médico , Adolescente , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Protección Infantil , Preescolar , Violencia Doméstica/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Escritura Manual , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to explore women's perceptions of the power and control tactics used by their former husbands post-separation. A total of 22 in-depth interviews with divorced mothers who reported male-initiated partner abuse (psychological and/or physical) during and/or after their marriages were analyzed. The most common themes to emerge from the narratives were, in order of prevalence, as follows: Using the Children; Using Threats, Harassment, and Intimidation; Emotional Abuse; Economic Abuse; "Stuff to Try to Hurt Me"; Disrupting Her Relationships With the Children; Using the System; and Physical Violence. We also found that the violent and coercive behaviors men used during the marriage continued to influence the women's perceptions of the power and control their former husbands had over them post-separation. As a result, many of the women described how they gave up everything just to get out of their abusive marriages.
Asunto(s)
Cultura , Divorcio/psicología , Control Interno-Externo , Poder Psicológico , Maltrato Conyugal/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Coerción , Divorcio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Violencia de Pareja , Masculino , Matrimonio/psicología , Madres , Narración , Prevalencia , Problema de Conducta/psicología , Maltrato Conyugal/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the role of measured intellectual function in framing parents as 'unfit' in child custody deprivation cases. METHOD: Grounded theory was used to analyse a national sample of custody deprivation cases in Iceland 2002-2014. RESULTS: The terminology used to evaluate and describe the intellectual and developmental status of parents in child deprivation custody cases served as a device to define and shape the 'unfit parent'. Intellect itself, whether as low, average or even above average at times acts as a master narrative which informs and explains all manner of perceived parental deficiencies. CONCLUSION: The intellectual and developmental status served as a yardstick of identifying, understanding and interpreting the unfit parent. As a tool to achieve an end, parents were framed in language and culture using underlying belief set to make sense of events and issues.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Discapacidad Intelectual , Padres , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , IslandiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study addresses children of parents with intellectual disability in Norway. The aim was to examine: (i) the impact of definitions of intellectual disability on prevalence, (ii) whether numbers were increasing, (iii) the prevalence of motherhood and fatherhood and (iv) rates of lost custody. METHODS: Analyses of national registers (n = 30 834) and mapping in four municipalities (n = 85). RESULTS: 0.19% of all children had parents with recorded intellectual disability, increasing to 0.87% with wider inclusion criteria. The number of children born to parents with intellectual disability has been declining since the mid-1980s. The proportion of mothers with intellectual disability was twice that of fathers. Parental custody was revoked for 30-50% of children, with single mothers being at particular risk. Parents with intellectual disability accounted for 20-25% of all custody cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that prevalence depends on the definition of intellectual disability. The decreasing number of children and the need for development of specially adapted family supports are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/estadística & datos numéricos , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Custodia del Niño/tendencias , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Information about parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in the child protection system (CPS) continues to evolve. This study examined characteristics, experiences and representation of parents with IDD across three CPS decision points, as compared to parents with other disabilities and parents without disabilities in the United States. METHODS: The sample consisted of 303,039 individuals: 2,081 were individuals identified as parents in a CPS investigation; 1,101 had children in out-of-home care (OHC); and 308 experienced termination of parental rights (TPR). Descriptive statistics, chi-square analysis, disparity indices and logistic regression were employed. RESULTS: Parents with IDD were significantly more likely than parents without disabilities (but not significantly more likely than parents with other types of disabilities) to experience disproportionately representation. CONCLUSIONS: Parents with IDD are generally over-represented within CPS; however, this representation is dependent upon the comparison group utilized and other risk factors. CPS system-level changes are necessary.
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Protección Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Discapacidades del Desarrollo , Discapacidad Intelectual , Padres , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Custodia del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Minnesota , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Despite a lack of research on parent programs for separating unmarried parents, many judicial officers mandate participation. Rudd, Holtzworth-Munroe, Reyome, Applegate, and D'Onofrio (2015) conducted the only randomized controlled trial of any online parent program for separating parents, ProudToParent.org (PTP), and related court processes (e.g., having a waiting period between the establishment of paternity and the court hearing regarding child related issues vs. having the hearing the same day). They recruited a unique sample of 182 cases in a Title IV-D Court (i.e., a court for primarily low income parents) (Authorization of Appropriations, 42 U.S.C. § 651, 2013), in which paternity was previously contested but subsequently established via court-ordered genetic testing. Unexpectedly, cases assigned to PTP and a waiting period were the least likely to reach agreement at their court hearing. In the current study, we extend these results to examine the impact of the study conditions on relitigation in the year following the court hearing; only 11.2% of cases filed a motion, and 7.8% had a hearing. The group that was least likely to reach full initial agreement (i.e., assigned to PTP and the waiting period) were the most likely to relitigate. Further, controlling for study conditions, reaching a full agreement in the Title IV-D court decreased the odds of having a court hearing in the following year. Reaching agreements on the specific issues involved in such cases (e.g., custody, child support) reduced the likelihood of both motions and hearings in the year after the Title IV-D hearings. The implications of these findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
Asunto(s)
Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Divorcio/estadística & datos numéricos , Paternidad , Padres Solteros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Divorcio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Padres Solteros/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Parents who use opioids and are involved in the child welfare system are less likely to retain custody of their children than parents who use other drugs. No previous studies have described medication-assisted treatment (MAT) utilization and child permanency outcomes for this population. The Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Team (START) model is a child welfare-based intervention focused on families with co-occurring substance use and child abuse / neglect issues. This study examined the prevalence and correlates of MAT utilization among parents in the START program with a history of opioid use, and compared child outcomes for families who received MAT services to those who did not. Of the 596 individuals with a history of opioid use in the START program, 55 (9.2%) received MAT. Receipt of MAT services did not differ by gender, age, county of residence, or drug use, though individuals who identified as White were more likely to participate in MAT. In a multiple logistic regression model, additional months of MAT increased the odds of parents retaining custody of their children. To address barriers to MAT, results-focused educational interventions may be needed for the child welfare workforce, as well as programs to improve collaboration and decision-making between the child welfare workforce, court personnel, and drug addiction treatment providers.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Protección a la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Kentucky , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: Increasing proportions of Scandinavian children and children in other Western countries live in joint physical custody, moving between parents' homes when parents live apart. Children and parents in non-intact families are at risk of worse mental health. The potential influence of parental ill-health on child well-being in the context of differing living arrangements has not been studied thoroughly. This study investigates the psychological complaints of children in joint physical custody in comparison to children in sole parental care and nuclear families, while controlling for socioeconomic differences and parental ill-health. METHODS: Data were obtained from Statistics Sweden's yearly Survey of Living Conditions 2007-2011 and child supplements with children 10-18 years, living in households of adult participants. Children in joint physical custody (n=391) were compared with children in sole parental care (n=654) and children in nuclear families (n=3,639), using a scale of psychological complaints as the outcome measure. RESULTS: Multiple regression modelling showed that children in joint physical custody did not report higher levels of psychological complaints than those in nuclear families, while children in sole parental care reported elevated levels of complaints compared with those in joint physical custody. Adding socioeconomic variables and parental ill-health only marginally attenuated the coefficients for the living arrangement groups. Low parental education and parental worry/anxiety were however associated with higher levels of psychological complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological complaints were lower among adolescents in joint physical custody than in adolescents in sole parental care. The difference was not explained by parental ill-health or socioeconomic variables.