Pharmacokinetic characteristics of N7-substituted theophylline derivatives and their interaction with quinolone in rats.

Disposition of diprophylline (DPP) and proxyphylline (PXP) and the effect of enoxacin on their disposition were investigated in rats. Concentrations of the two drugs in plasma and urine were measured by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs were estimated by model-independent methods. Although the chemical structures of the two drugs are very similar, remarkable differences in the disposition of the two drugs were observed. Total body clearance (CLT) of DPP was 1.77 L/h/kg, which was sevenfold greater than that of PXP (0.26 L/h/kg). Diprophylline was excreted in an almost completely unchanged form in the urine, but only 50% of PXP was excreted. However, no binding of either drug to proteins in rat plasma was observed. The DPP renal clearance (CLR) was 1.75 L/h/kg, approximately 13-fold the CLR for PXP (0.13 L/h/kg) and sevenfold the rat glomerular filtration rate. This study indicates that in rats, DPP is mainly excreted by active tubular secretion and that renal tubular reabsorption contributes to renal excretion of PXP with glomerular filtration. No significant changes in any pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs were observed when they were coadministered with enoxacin, compared with the drug administered alone, suggesting that enoxacin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of either drug.

Utilization of intravenous dihydroxypropyl theophylline (dyphylline) in an aminophylline-sensitive patient, and its pharmacokinetic comparison with theophylline.

The pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of intravenously administered 7-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl) theophylline (dyphylline), were studied in a 37-yr-old asthmatic woman with ethylene diamine sensitivity who manifested intolerance to intravenous aminophylline on three separate occasions. In this subject, intravenously administered dyphylline was tolerated very well and was effective in the subsequent management of acute bronchospastic episodes. Dyphylline was significantly concentrated in the urine. This, coupled with its rapid clearance, suggests potential clinical application in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Though aminophylline sensitivity is rare, ethylene diamine sensitivity should be considered in untoward reactions to this drug.

Urinary excretion of dyphylline in humans.

The pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of a single dyphylline dose were studied in five normal volunteers. The mean dyphylline half-life was 1.8 +/- 0.2 hr; the mean total body clearance rate and mean renal clearance rate were 333 +/- 62 and 276 +/- 52 ml/min, respectively; and the mean volume of distribution was 0.8 +/- 0.2 liter/kg. In the urine, 83 +/- 5% of the dose was excreted as unchanged drug, and theophylline was not detected. Dyphylline doses of 19--27 mg/kg, resulting in peak serum dyphylline concentrations of 19.3--23.5 micrograms/ml, were tolerated well by four subjects. One subject had a severe headache following a 28-mg/kg dose, associated with a peak serum dyphylline concentration of 36.4 micrograms/ml. This study confirms speculation that dyphylline is not metabolized to theophylline in vivo.