RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) as an accelerating global phenomenon that must be addressed. According to the WHO, thirty to fifty percent of the world's population are VH. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style demonstrated to significantly reduce VH. MI guides people toward change through the expression of empathy and by respecting an individual's autonomy. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are the primary implementors of vaccine policies and the most trusted advisors and influencers of vaccination intention at the individual patient level. Training HCPs in MI is one of the most effective strategies to overcome VH. Many countries are currently implementing HCP training programs and population-based MI interventions to improve vaccine uptake. MI conversations are 'the heart' of vaccine decision-making processes. Understanding individual patient-level drivers of hesitancy allows clinicians to efficiently provide tailored, accurate information that reinforces a person's own motivation and confidence in their own decision. This paper describes a 4-step practical framework designed to support HCPs in their dialogue with vaccine-hesitant patients. (1) Engaging to establish a trustful relationship and safety to freely express opinions, beliefs, and knowledge gaps; (2) Understanding what matters most to the individual; (3) Offering Information to co-build accurate knowledge in order to guide the individual toward vaccine intention (4) Clarifying and Accepting to validate an individual's decision-making autonomy. We believe that our pragmatic approach can contribute to greater acceptability of COVID-19 and other vaccines, and enable rapid deployment of practical MI skills across care systems.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Motivación , Entrevista Motivacional , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Vacunación , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/psicología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Consejo/métodos , Toma de Decisiones , SARS-CoV-2 , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en SaludRESUMEN
Introduction: The COVID pandemic and affiliated infodemic led to widespread health misinformation, generating confusion and distrust. Physicians must identify and address misinformation, with attention to cultural/health literacy, equity, and autonomy. Most medical students receive training in core communication techniques but are rarely taught how to combat misinformation with patients and lack opportunities for practice in diverse settings. Methods: We used mixed methods to evaluate the impact of a role-play-based training curriculum on 44 third- and fourth-year medical students' comfort and confidence applying ask-respond-tell-seek solutions (ARTS) and motivational interviewing (MI) to discuss vaccine hesitancy, using COVID-19 as an example. There were three training iterations: prior to volunteering at a community health fair, during a medicine clinical rotation, and during a pediatrics rotation. Pre- and postsession questionnaires were administered. Likert-scale questions assessed comfort and confidence using ARTS and MI. Narrative responses focused on previous experiences with vaccine hesitancy, challenges faced, and session takeaways. Results: Students' comfort, confidence with ARTS/MI, and self-reported ability to discuss COVID-19 vaccinations improved as measured by pre- and postsession surveys (p < .05). Qualitatively, students reported increased confidence delivering recommendations in plain language and exploring patients' thought processes behind choices. Discussion: Reinforcement of core communications strategies in medical school can positively impact trainees' ability and ease addressing misinformation. We recommend this 45-minute training session to effectively increase medical students' comfort and confidence in discussing COVID-19 vaccines with patients. It can be adapted to any health professions school with an existing communications thread.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comunicación , Curriculum , Desempeño de Papel , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , FemeninoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Motivational Interviewing (MI) is described as a method for improving clinical outcomes by reducing client ambivalence. If this is true, MI's focus on improving clients' motivational language should be most useful for clients with ambivalence about change and less valuable for those who are ready to implement new behaviors or are opposed to change. To address this hypothesis and potentially add precision to MI delivery in clinical settings, we tested whether the relationship between clients' in-session motivational language and posttreatment alcohol use depended on their baseline motivation to change. METHOD: Client speech from 149 sessions from Project MATCH were analyzed. A cluster analysis of the percent change talk during the first decile of the session identified three motivational groups: opposed, ambivalent, and ready. The change in percent change talk (C-PCT) across the session was calculated for each group. Zero-inflated negative binomial analysis was used to test whether the effect of C-PCT on end-of-treatment drinking varied between motivational groups. RESULTS: The count part of the model revealed a significant interaction between C-PCT and membership in the ambivalent group (b = -17.710, 95% CI [-25.775, -9.645], p < .001), only for those who received MI. Favorable C-PCT was associated with less drinking (b = -15.735, p = .004). Only baseline drinking was a significant predictor of abstinence at follow-up (b = .032, 95% CI [0.012, 0.051], p = .001). CONCLUSION: A putative MI mechanism-improved client motivational language-appears most important for clients who express ambivalence in the opening minutes of the session, with minimal value for those who do not. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Motivación , Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Alcoholismo/terapia , Alcoholismo/psicología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/terapia , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no clinical practice guidelines addressing the treatment of tobacco-cannabis co-use and a dearth of studies to inform treatment for co-use. This narrative review aims to (1) summarize promising intervention components used in published co-use treatment studies, (2) describe key gaps and emerging issues in co-use, and (3) provide recommendations and considerations in the development and evaluation of co-use interventions. METHODS: We conducted a literature search in June 2024 across several databases to update previous reviews on tobacco-cannabis co-use treatment. We found 9 published intervention studies that specifically addressed treatment for both substances. Data from these studies were manually extracted and summarized. RESULTS: Most of the 9 included studies (1) focused on acceptability and/or feasibility, (2) provided both psychosocial/behavioral and pharmacotherapy intervention components, (3) were conducted in adults, and (4) were delivered in-person, with some having digital asynchronous components, for a 5-to-12-week duration. The most common psychosocial/behavioral strategies used were Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Motivational Interviewing, and Contingency Management; while the most common pharmacotherapy was Nicotine Replacement Therapy. There was no evidence of compensatory use of tobacco or cannabis when providing simultaneous treatment for both substances. CONCLUSIONS: The literature to date provides support for well-integrated multi-component interventions of psychosocial/behavioral and pharmacotherapy strategies for co-use treatment. This review reinforces an urgent need for treatments targeting tobacco and cannabis co-use. Future interventions should address key gaps, including co-use of vaporized products among youth and young adults, tailored interventions for priority populations, and digital applications to increase reach and advance health equity.
Asunto(s)
Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Abuso de Marihuana/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking poses a major public health risk. Chatbots may serve as an accessible and useful tool to promote cessation due to their high accessibility and potential in facilitating long-term personalized interactions. To increase effectiveness and acceptability, there remains a need to identify and evaluate counseling strategies for these chatbots, an aspect that has not been comprehensively addressed in previous research. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify effective counseling strategies for such chatbots to support smoking cessation. In addition, we sought to gain insights into smokers' expectations of and experiences with the chatbot. METHODS: This mixed methods study incorporated a web-based experiment and semistructured interviews. Smokers (N=229) interacted with either a motivational interviewing (MI)-style (n=112, 48.9%) or a confrontational counseling-style (n=117, 51.1%) chatbot. Both cessation-related (ie, intention to quit and self-efficacy) and user experience-related outcomes (ie, engagement, therapeutic alliance, perceived empathy, and interaction satisfaction) were assessed. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 participants, 8 (50%) from each condition, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Results from a multivariate ANOVA showed that participants had a significantly higher overall rating for the MI (vs confrontational counseling) chatbot. Follow-up discriminant analysis revealed that the better perception of the MI chatbot was mostly explained by the user experience-related outcomes, with cessation-related outcomes playing a lesser role. Exploratory analyses indicated that smokers in both conditions reported increased intention to quit and self-efficacy after the chatbot interaction. Interview findings illustrated several constructs (eg, affective attitude and engagement) explaining people's previous expectations and timely and retrospective experience with the chatbot. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that chatbots are a promising tool in motivating smoking cessation and the use of MI can improve user experience. We did not find extra support for MI to motivate cessation and have discussed possible reasons. Smokers expressed both relational and instrumental needs in the quitting process. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Entrevista Motivacional , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Consejo/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the rise of computer science and artificial intelligence, analyzing large data sets promises enormous potential in gaining insights for developing and improving evidence-based health interventions. One such intervention is the counseling strategy motivational interviewing (MI), which has been found effective in improving a wide range of health-related behaviors. Despite the simplicity of its principles, MI can be a challenging skill to learn and requires expertise to apply effectively. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence models in classifying MI behavior and explore the feasibility of using these models in online helplines for mental health as an automated support tool for counselors in clinical practice. METHODS: We used a coded data set of 253 MI counseling chat sessions from the 113 Suicide Prevention helpline. With 23,982 messages coded with the MI Sequential Code for Observing Process Exchanges codebook, we trained and evaluated 4 machine learning models and 1 deep learning model to classify client- and counselor MI behavior based on language use. RESULTS: The deep learning model BERTje outperformed all machine learning models, accurately predicting counselor behavior (accuracy=0.72, area under the curve [AUC]=0.95, Cohen κ=0.69). It differentiated MI congruent and incongruent counselor behavior (AUC=0.92, κ=0.65) and evocative and nonevocative language (AUC=0.92, κ=0.66). For client behavior, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.70 (AUC=0.89, κ=0.55). The model's interpretable predictions discerned client change talk and sustain talk, counselor affirmations, and reflection types, facilitating valuable counselor feedback. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that artificial intelligence techniques can accurately classify MI behavior, indicating their potential as a valuable tool for enhancing MI proficiency in online helplines for mental health. Provided that the data set size is sufficiently large with enough training samples for each behavioral code, these methods can be trained and applied to other domains and languages, offering a scalable and cost-effective way to evaluate MI adherence, accelerate behavioral coding, and provide therapists with personalized, quick, and objective feedback.
Asunto(s)
Entrevista Motivacional , Prevención del Suicidio , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Líneas Directas , Aprendizaje Automático , Inteligencia Artificial , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Consejo/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Approximately 16.5% of U.S. young adults have a cannabis use disorder (CUD) and are at risk for negative outcomes. Treatment can reduce cannabis use, but young adults are less likely to seek help than older adults. Peer Network Counseling-txt (PNC-txt) is a brief, text-delivered, Motivational Interviewing-informed substance use intervention focusing on peer relations and activity spaces as mechanisms for behavioral change. PNC-txt has shown evidence of reducing tobacco and cannabis use with adolescents and young adults, but it has not been tested in the context of legal cannabis use. The current randomized controlled trial sought to expand the evidence regarding the context of PNC-txt effects, comparing one state in which cannabis is legal (Colorado) and one state in which it is not (Tennessee). We hypothesized that participants randomized to PNC-txt would show significant reductions in cannabis use compared to controls, with larger reductions for females and those in Colorado, and that peer relations and activity space would mediate effects. METHODS: One thousand, seventy eight 18-25 year olds (CO: 551; TN: 527) who met screening criteria for CUD and biologically-verified cannabis use were randomly assigned to PNC-txt or waitlist control condition. Every other day for 4 weeks, participants assigned to PNC-txt received pre-programmed text conversations, tailored via data from the baseline assessment. Self-report and biological indicators of cannabis use were measured at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. DISCUSSION: Data analysis is underway. Results will provide evidence regarding whether, and how, PNC-txt reduces cannabis use in young adults with CUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on September 28, 2020 with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04567394).
Asunto(s)
Consejo , Abuso de Marihuana , Entrevista Motivacional , Grupo Paritario , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Abuso de Marihuana/terapia , Abuso de Marihuana/psicología , Adolescente , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Adulto , Consejo/métodos , Colorado , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) is beneficial but difficult to maintain during chemotherapy. This pilot RCT explored the feasibility of the MI-Walk intervention-an 8-week motivational enhancement therapy- and home-based brisk walking intervention-among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty stage II-IV GI cancer survivors were recruited from 5 sites at their second infusion visit. Participants were randomized to receive PA education alone or the MI-Walk intervention: motivational enhancement therapy consisting of 3 motivational interviewing and self-efficacy-enhancing counseling sessions, a Fitbit Charge 2, exercise diaries, telephone follow-up, scripted motivational email messages, and optional weekly walking groups. RESULTS: The enrollment and completion rates were 62% and 90%, respectively. The MI-Walk participants (n = 29; mean age = 56.79, SD = 11.72; 97% white; 79% male) reported a baseline moderate-vigorous PA duration of 250.93 (SD = 636.52) min/wk. The mean MI-Walk Intervention acceptability score was 50.32 (SD = 12.02) on a scale of 14-70. Mean Fitbit and counseling helpfulness scores on a 5-point scale were 3.67 (SD = 1.43) and 3.44 (SD = 1.36), respectively. Participants' Fitbit moderate-vigorous PA 8-week averages ranged from 0 to 716.88 min/wk; 64% of participants adhered to ≥127 min/wk. Several characteristics (e.g., age, comorbidity, PA level, employment status, BMI, education level, gender, symptoms) were associated with enrollment, attrition, and intervention acceptability and adherence (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Enrollment and retention were adequate. The Fitbit and counseling were the most helpful. Acceptability and adherence varied based on participant characteristics; therefore, intervention tailoring and further research among cancer survivors less physically active at baseline and most in need of complex exercise intervention are needed. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT03515356.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Ejercicio Físico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Proyectos Piloto , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Antineoplásicos , Adulto , CaminataRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality for US women; lack of health insurance contributes to poor control of risk factors and increased mortality. Health coaching including motivational interviewing can support primary and secondary CVD prevention, but among uninsured women, improving health outcomes is dependent on successfully reaching priority populations. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the implementation and reach of health coaching with motivational interviewing among clients in the Illinois WISEWOMAN Program (IWP), a CVD screening and risk-reduction program for uninsured women aged 40 to 64. INTERVENTION: Following CVD screening, motivational interviewing is offered to all IWP clients via four 30-min one-on-one health coaching sessions to offer personalized guidance on setting and achieving health behavior goals. SETTING: Our analysis included clients from the eight community-based Illinois agencies that implemented IWP from 2019 to 2023. DESIGN AND MEASURES: We assessed client demographic and baseline health characteristics among all IWP clients, those who participated in health coaching by attending at least one session, and those who completed health coaching by attending at least three of four sessions. We also assessed health coaching participation and completion by agency and examined agency-specific associations between client characteristics and health coaching participation and completion. RESULTS: Among IWP enrollees (n = 3094), 89.7% participated in at least one health coaching session but only 31.4% completed health coaching by attending at least three sessions. Over 90% of IWP clients participated in at least one health coaching session at 4 IWP agencies. Further, over 85% of health coaching participants completed health coaching at four agencies. Across agencies, no client-level characteristics were consistently associated with health coaching participation or completion. CONCLUSIONS: High motivational interviewing participation rates support its acceptability among uninsured women, but agency-level community-level barriers likely prevent client engagement in multiple sessions. Reducing CVD risk requires working with partner agencies to address barriers to reaching the priority population.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Tutoría , Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos , Femenino , Illinois , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Tutoría/métodos , Tutoría/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/psicología , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of behavioural interventions that include motivational interviewing on physical activity outcomes in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. STUDY SELECTION: A search of seven databases for randomised controlled trials published from inception to 1 March 2023 comparing a behavioural intervention including motivational interviewing with a comparator without motivational interviewing on physical activity outcomes in adults. Outcomes of interest were differences in change in quantitative measures of total physical activity, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and sedentary time. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Population characteristics, intervention components, comparison groups, and outcomes of studies were summarised. For overall main effects, random effects meta-analyses were used to report standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differential effects based on duration of follow-up, comparator type, intervention duration, and disease or health condition of participants were also examined. RESULTS: 129 papers reporting 97 randomised controlled trials totalling 27 811 participants and 105 comparisons were included. Interventions including motivational interviewing were superior to comparators for increases in total physical activity (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.65, equivalent to 1323 extra steps/day; low certainty evidence) and MVPA (0.45, 0.19 to 0.71, equivalent to 95 extra min/week; very low certainty evidence) and for reductions in sedentary time (-0.58, -1.03 to -0.14, equivalent to -51 min/day; very low certainty evidence). Evidence for a difference in any outcome compared with comparators of similar intensity was lacking. The magnitude of effect diminished over time, and evidence of an effect of motivational interviewing beyond one year was lacking. Most interventions involved patients with a specific health condition, and evidence of an effect of motivational interviewing to increase MVPA or decrease sedentary time was lacking in general population samples. CONCLUSIONS: Certainty of the evidence using motivational interviewing as part of complex behavioural interventions for promoting total physical activity in adults was low, and for MVPA and sedentary time was very low. The totality of evidence suggests that although interventions with motivational interviewing increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behaviour, no difference was found in studies where the effect of motivational interviewing could be isolated. Effectiveness waned over time, with no evidence of a benefit of motivational interviewing to increase physical activity beyond one year. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020219881.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Adulto , Conducta Sedentaria , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Promoción de la Salud/métodosRESUMEN
The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of motivational interviewing as based on Pender's health promotion model (HPM) on diabetes self-management behavior among individuals with Type 2 diabetes. Apart from their routine care, the individuals in the intervention group were given a 30-45-minute motivational interview based on Pender's HPM once a week for three months. Statistically significant differences were determined between the groups in the total score of the scales and its sub-dimensions (p < .05). The intervention applied in the present study can be used as an effective and easy method through which to develop and maintain diabetes self-management behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Promoción de la Salud , Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Automanejo/métodos , Automanejo/psicología , Autocuidado/métodos , Motivación , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Adulto , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Moderately vigorous physical activity (PA) may be beneficial for people with sub-acute low back pain (LBP), but may initially be painful for patients and challenging for physical therapists to facilitate. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated motivational interviewing (MI) delivered by physical therapists and a smartphone app for increasing PA in people with LBP. METHODS: A mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial involving 46 adults with LBP in Melbourne, Australia. Participants attended weekly 30-min physical therapy consultations for 6 weeks. Experimental group physical therapists were taught to embed MI into consultations and patients were provided with a self-directed app. The primary outcome was accelerometer-derived moderately vigorous PA. Secondary outcomes were LBP disability (Oswestry Disability Index), functional capacity (Patient Specific Functional Scale), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Between-group differences were analysed by ANCOVA post-intervention. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and control group for PA. Between-group differences in LBP disability (MD= 19.4 units, 95% CI: 8.5, 30.3), functional capacity (primary MD= -4.1 units, 95% CI: -6.9, -1.3; average MD= -3.1, 95% CI: -4.9, -1.2) and self-efficacy (MD -11.3 units, 95%CI -20.2, -2.5) favoured the control group with small to moderate effect sizes. There were low levels of overall engagement with the app. CONCLUSION: The embedded MI intervention was no more beneficial than physical therapy alone for PA and was associated with poorer LBP disability, function, and self-efficacy. The effectiveness of embedding MI and a smartphone app into usual care for LBP was not supported.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Entrevista Motivacional , Teléfono Inteligente , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Aplicaciones Móviles , Australia , Adulto , Autoeficacia , Masculino , Modalidades de FisioterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The three types of evidence-based treatment options for adults with overweight and obesity - behavioral weight management, anti-obesity medications (AOM), and bariatric surgery - are underutilized in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. Our objective in this manuscript is to describe the study protocol for an adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a behavioral intervention: TOTAL (Teaching Obesity Treatment Options to Adult Learners) to increase patient uptake of obesity treatment. METHODS: In this multi-site, parallel, RCT, eligible Veterans with a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 27 who had not received obesity treatment within the past 12 months were randomly assigned to TOTAL or usual care. TOTAL involves watching an 18-min video that highlights obesity health risks, pros/cons of all three evidence-based obesity treatments, and expected treatment outcomes. It also includes motivational sessions delivered via televideo at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the video (target n = 494 participants). The primary outcome is initiation of behavioral weight management treatment within 18 months of randomization. Secondary outcomes include sustained behavioral weight management treatment, initiation of AOM, bariatric surgery referral, and weight change across 18 months. CONCLUSION: TOTAL, which seeks to increase delivery of weight management treatment within the largest integrated health system in the U.S., combines patient education with motivational interviewing components. If efficacious in this trial, further evaluation of intervention effectiveness and implementation throughout the VHA and other healthcare systems would be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Terapia Conductista , Obesidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Obesidad/terapia , Sobrepeso/terapia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Pérdida de Peso , Programas de Reducción de Peso/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors, at risk for late effects, including cancer-related fatigue, cardiovascular issues, and psychosocial challenges, may benefit from interventions stimulating behaviour adjustments. Three nurse-led eHealth interventions (REVIVER) delivered via video calls and elaborating on person-centred care, cognitive behaviour therapy and/or motivational interviewing were developed. These interventions target: 1) fatigue management, 2) healthier lifestyle behaviours, and 3) self-efficacy and self-management. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of the REVIVER interventions for CAYA cancer survivors and healthcare professionals. METHODS: In a single-group mixed methods design, CAYA cancer survivors aged 16-54, more than five years post-treatment, were enrolled. Feasibility, assessed via Bowen's outcomes for feasibility studies, included acceptability, practicality, integration and implementation, demand and adherence. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and a focus group interview with survivors and healthcare professionals supplemented the evaluation. Paired sample t-tests assessed changes in self-reported quality of life, fatigue, lifestyle, self-management, and self-efficacy at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2). RESULTS: The interventions and video consults were generally acceptable, practical, and successfully integrated and implemented. Success factors included the nurse consultant (i.e., communication, approach, and attitude) and the personalised approach. Barriers included sustainability concerns, technical issues, and short intervention duration. Regarding demand, 71.4%, 65.4%, and 100% of eligible CAYA cancer survivors engaged in the fatigue (N = 15), lifestyle (N = 17) and empowerment (N = 3) intervention, respectively, with 5, 5 and 2 participants interviewed, correspondingly. Low interest (demand) in the empowerment intervention (N = 3) and dropout rates of one-third for both fatigue and empowerment interventions were noted (adherence). Improvements in quality of life, fatigue (fatigue intervention), lifestyle (lifestyle intervention), self-efficacy, and self-management were evident among survivors who completed the fatigue and lifestyle interventions, with medium and large effect sizes observed immediately after the intervention and six months post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of nurse-led video coaching (REVIVER interventions) despite lower demand for the empowerment intervention and lower adherence to the fatigue and empowerment interventions. The medium and high effect sizes found for those who completed the interventions hold potential clinical significance for future studies investigating the effectiveness of the REVIVER interventions.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Estudios de Factibilidad , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Telemedicina , Tutoría/métodos , Autoeficacia , Fatiga/etiología , Neoplasias/enfermería , Neoplasias/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Automanejo/métodos , Niño , Entrevista Motivacional/métodosRESUMEN
Importance: Most individuals with problem gambling or gambling disorder remain untreated due to barriers to treatment. Limited research exists on alternative treatments. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a self-guided internet-based intervention for individuals with gambling problems and to identify potential outcome moderators. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 13, 2021, to December 31, 2022, at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Participants were recruited across Germany for 2 assessments (before intervention [t0] and 6 weeks after intervention [t1]). Eligible participants were individuals aged 18 to 75 years with gambling problems, internet access, German proficiency, and willingness to participate in 2 online assessments. Intervention: The self-guided internet-based intervention was based on cognitive behavioral therapy, metacognitive training, acceptance and commitment therapy, and motivational interviewing. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was change in gambling-related thoughts and behavior as measured with the pathological gambling adaption of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale. Secondary outcomes were change in depressive symptoms, gambling severity, gambling-specific dysfunctional thoughts, attitudes toward online interventions, treatment expectations, and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 243 participants (154 [63.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 34.73 [10.33] years) were randomized to an intervention group (n = 119) that gained access to a self-guided internet-based intervention during 6 weeks or a wait-listed control group (n = 124). Completion at t1 was high (191 [78.6%]). Results showed a significantly greater reduction in gambling-related thoughts and behavior (mean difference, -3.35; 95% CI, -4.79 to -1.91; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.59), depressive symptoms (mean difference, -1.05; 95% CI, -1.87 to -0.22; P = .01; Cohen d = 0.33), and gambling severity (mean difference, -1.46; 95% CI, -2.37 to -0.54; P = .002; Cohen d = 0.40) but not in gambling-specific dysfunctional thoughts (mean difference, -1.62; 95% CI, -3.40 to 0.15; P = .07; Cohen d = 0.23) favoring the intervention group. Individuals in the intervention group who had a positive treatment expectation and more severe gambling-specific dysfunctional thoughts and gambling symptoms benefited more on the primary outcome relative to the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the effectiveness of a self-guided internet-based intervention for individuals with self-reported problematic gambling behavior was demonstrated when measured 6 weeks after start of the intervention. The study's findings are particularly relevant given the increasing need for accessible and scalable solutions to address problematic gambling. Trial Registration: bfarm.de Identifier: DRKS00024840.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Juego de Azar , Intervención basada en la Internet , Humanos , Masculino , Juego de Azar/terapia , Juego de Azar/psicología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Alemania , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Anciano , Adulto Joven , InternetRESUMEN
Effective training of mental health professionals is crucial for bridging the gap between research and practice when delivering cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing (MI) within community settings. However, previous research has provided inconclusive evidence regarding the impact of training efforts. The current study aimed to systematically search, review and synthesize the literature on CBT and MI training to assess its effect on practitioner behavioural outcomes. Following prospective registration, a literature search was conducted for studies where mental health practitioners were exposed to training in face-to-face CBT or MI, reporting on at least one quantitative practitioner behavioural outcome. A total of 116 studies were eligible for the systematic review, and 20 studies were included in four meta-analyses. The systematic review highlights the need to establish psychometrically valid outcome measures for practitioner behaviour. Results of the meta-analyses suggest that training has a greater effect on practitioner behaviour change compared to receiving no training or reading a treatment manual. Training combined with consultation/supervision was found to be more effective than training alone, and no differences were found between face-to-face and online training. Results should be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations in the primary studies, large heterogeneity, and small samples in the meta-analyses. Future directions are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Personal de Salud/educación , Personal de Salud/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/psicologíaRESUMEN
Polycystic ovary syndrome is one of the commonest and complex endocrine disorders in females of reproductive age. Attention to self-care behaviors such as health-promoting behaviors can improve physiological and psychological conditions in women with PCOS. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of Social Network-Based Motivational Interviewing on health-promoting behaviors and quality of life of infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. In this randomized controlled trial, 60 infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome were randomly selected and assigned to the interventio (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30). Participants in the control group received routine care. Those in the intervention group received five motivational group sessions in WhatsApp, which were conducted in five groups of six participants each. The data related to health-promoting behaviors and quality of life were collected through an online questionnaire. Both groups were followed up immediately and 2 months after the intervention. Data collected in the two stages were analyzed using the paired-samples t-test, Chi-square, and repeated measures analysis. No significant difference was observed between the two groups before the intervention means health-promoting behaviors and quality of life scores (p>0.05). Immediately and two months after the intervention, the mean scores of health-promoting behaviors and their domains increased in the intervention group. This increase is statistically compared to the first test, and the scores obtained by the control group in the second (p< 0.001, ES = 1.5) and the third test (p< 0.001, ES= 1.3) were significant. The score of the quality of life variable increase was not statistically significant compared to the first test and also to the scores obtained by the control group. However According to the Generalized estimating equations (GEE) test, the changes in quality of life score between the two groups in the three stages of measurement are statistically significant. WhatsApp support increases the health-promoting self-care behaviors rate and has favorable effects on follow-up.Trial registration: Iranian Registry for Clinical Trial (the link to trial: https://www.irct.ir/trial/48089 ). Registered August 11 2020.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Infertilidad Femenina , Entrevista Motivacional , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/psicología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Adulto , Infertilidad Femenina/psicología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Red Social , Adulto Joven , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Counselling adolescents with chronic medical conditions (CMCs) can be challenging regarding suitable interviewing skills and clinicians' attitudes toward the patient. Successful communication can be a key element of treatment. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is broadly applicable in managing behavioural problems and diseases by increasing patient motivation for lifestyle changes. However, data concerning the applicability, feasibility and implementation of MI sessions in everyday practice are missing from the physicians' point of view. METHOD: The present study was conducted as a mixed methods design. Twenty paediatricians were randomized to a 2-day MI course followed by MI consultations. Data were collected through a questionnaire one year after MI training. Factors for effective training and possible barriers to successful use of MI were examined. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 19 of 20 paediatricians. The paediatricians' experiences with MI demonstrate that MI is regarded as a valuable tool when working with adolescents with CMCs. 95% of all respondents reported that they found MI education necessary for their clinical work and were using it also outside the COACH-MI study context. 73.7% percent saw potential to strengthen the connection to their patients by using MI. The doctors were already using more MI conversation techniques after a 2-day MI course. Obstacles were seen in the short training, the lack of time and missing undisturbed environment (interruptions by telephone, staff, etc.) during clinical flow. CONCLUSIONS: MI techniques are not yet a regular part of medical training. However, a 2-day MI course was rated effective and provided a lasting impact by physicians caring for children and adolescents with chronic medical conditions (CMCs), although booster sessions should be offered regularly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00014043) on 26/04/2018.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Entrevista Motivacional , Pediatras , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Adolescente , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Pediatras/educación , Pediatras/psicología , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pediatría/educaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based approach to enhance patients' motivation and is increasingly in demand in medical practice. Online teaching methods offer advantages to train health care professionals, but only very few studies examined whether MI-specific interviewing skills (""MI-skills""), and especially MIspecific attitudes (the "MI-spirit"), can be taught online and whether learning gains differ from those in face-to-face courses. This study compared the effects of 7 h of basic training for experienced general practitioners (GP) in either an online or a traditional face-to-face format with a non-trained control group. METHODS: "MI-skills" and "MI-spirit" were measured in a prospective analysis in 49 experienced GPs before and one week after training RESULTS: An ANOVA on gain-scores demonstrated significant differences between groups in both MI-specific skills (VASE-R, p = 0.006) and "MIspirit" (MIKAT, p = 0.029; HRQ, p < 0.001) from pre- to posttest. Post-hoc comparisons revealed significant improvement only in the training groups (VASE-R, p < 0.001; MIKAT, p = 0.014 for online, p = 0.003 for face-to-face; HRQ, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest similar effects of both online and face-to-face training of "MI-skills" and "MI-spirit" to GPs. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Online learning opportunities should be integrated in MIT programs for general practitioners where appropriate.