Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.563
Filtrar
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(23): 2947-2953, 2024 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946871

RESUMEN

In this editorial, we respond to a review article by Nabi et al, in which the authors discussed gastroesophageal reflux (GER) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM is presently the primary therapeutic option for achalasia, which is both safe and effective. A few adverse effects were documented after POEM, including GER. The diagnostic criteria were not clear enough because approximately 60% of patients have a long acid exposure time, while only 10% experience reflux symptoms. Multiple predictors of high disease incidence have been identified, including old age, female sex, obesity, and a baseline lower esophageal sphincter pressure of less than 45 mmHg. Some technical steps during the procedure, such as a lengthy or full-thickness myotomy, may further enhance the risk. Proton pump inhibitors are currently the first line of treatment. Emerging voices are increasingly advocating for the routine combining of POEM with an endoscopic fundoplication method, such as peroral endoscopic fundoplication or transoral incisionless fundoplication. However, more research is necessary to determine the safety and effectiveness of these procedures in the long term for patients who have undergone them.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Miotomía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Acalasia del Esófago/fisiopatología , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatología , Esofagoscopía/efectos adversos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Miotomía/métodos , Miotomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/efectos adversos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(22): 2834-2838, 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947293

RESUMEN

This editorial is an analysis the review article by Nabi et al recently published in this journal. Achalasia Cardia is a disease whose pathophysiology is still unclear. It is known that there is inflammation of unknown aetiology leading to loss of ganglion cells in the muscularis propria. The end result is lower oesophageal sphincter spasm, loss of receptive relaxation, decreased oesophageal peristalsis, all leading on to varying degrees of dysphagia. The treatment of this condition is palliative in nature, performed by myotomy of the lower oesophagus either surgically or endoscopically. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with the myotomy performed, particularly with the Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) procedure. Nabi et al have provided an excellent overview of the latest developments in predicting, preventing, evaluating, and managing GERD subsequent to POEM. Based on this theme, this review article explores the concept of using histology of the oesophageal muscle layer, to grade the disease and thereby help tailoring the length/type of myotomy performed during the POEM procedure. In the future, will a histology based algorithm available preoperatively, help modify the POEM procedure, thereby decreasing the incidence of GERD associated with POEM?


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Humanos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/fisiopatología , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Miotomía/métodos , Miotomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/efectos adversos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Piloromiotomia/efectos adversos , Piloromiotomia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
BMJ ; 385: e074962, 2024 06 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830686

RESUMEN

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esófago de Barrett/terapia , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/patología
9.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 11(1)2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a standard treatment option for achalasia patients. Treatment response varies due to factors such as achalasia type, degree of dilatation, pressure and distensibility indices. We present an innovative approach for treatment response prediction based on an automatic three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of the tubular oesophagus (TE) and the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) in patients undergoing POEM for achalasia. METHODS: A software was developed, integrating data from high-resolution manometry, timed barium oesophagogram and endoscopic images to automatically generate 3-D reconstructions of the TE and LES. Novel normative indices for TE (volume×pressure) and LES (volume/pressure) were automatically integrated, facilitating pre-POEM and post-POEM comparisons. Treatment response was evaluated by changes in volumetric and pressure indices for the TE and the LES before as well as 3 and 12 months after POEM. In addition, these values were compared with normal value indices of non-achalasia patients. RESULTS: 50 treatment-naive achalasia patients were enrolled prospectively. The mean TE index decreased significantly (p<0.0001) and the mean LES index increased significantly 3 months post-POEM (p<0.0001). In the 12-month follow-up, no further significant change of value indices between 3 and 12 months post-POEM was seen. 3 months post-POEM mean LES index approached the mean LES of the healthy control group (p=0.077). CONCLUSION: 3-D reconstruction provides an interactive, dynamic visualisation of the oesophagus, serving as a comprehensive tool for evaluating treatment response. It may contribute to refining our approach to achalasia treatment and optimising treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 22-0149.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior , Imagenología Tridimensional , Manometría , Humanos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Manometría/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Esófago/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Miotomía/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Adulto Joven
12.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services yet is vital to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett's surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national pragmatic retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett's patients requiring urgent endoscopy. METHODS: All patients undergoing OCCD testing for Barrett's surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorize patients into risk groups. Endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. RESULTS: 4204 OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients underwent endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett's segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test. 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high-grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this equates to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no cancers diagnosed within 12 months post-OCCD in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk patients with Barrett's oesophagus requiring further investigation with endoscopy within the real-world setting.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagoscopía , Humanos , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Escocia/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Medición de Riesgo , Esófago/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Adulto
13.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3602-3608, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although esophageal achalasia has been historically treated by Heller myotomy, endoscopic esophageal dilatations are nowadays often the first-line treatment in children. The aim was to assess whether performing an endoscopic dilatation before a Heller myotomy is associated with higher risks of esophageal perforation in children. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study was performed, including children that underwent a Heller myotomy (2000-2022, 10 centers). Two groups were compared based on the history of previous dilatation before myotomy. Outcomes esophageal perforation (intra-operative or secondary) and post-operative complications requiring surgery (Clavien-Dindo III). Statistics Comparisons using contingency tables or Kruskal-Wallis when appropriate. Statistical significance: p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: A Heller myotomy was performed in 77 children (median age: 11.8 years), with prior endoscopic dilatation in 53% (n = 41). A laparoscopic approach was used in 90%, with associated fundoplication in 95%. Esophageal perforation occurred in 19% of children (n = 15), including 12 patients with intra-operative mucosal tear and 3 with post-operative complications related to an unnoticed esophageal perforation. Previous endoscopic dilatation did not increase the risk of esophageal perforation (22% vs 17%, OR: 1.4, 95%CI: 0.43-4.69). Post-operative complications occurred in 8% (n = 6), with similar rates regardless of prior endoscopic dilatation. Intra-operative mucosal tear was the only risk factor for post-operative complications, increasing the risk of complications from 5 to 25% (OR: 6.89, 95%CI: 1.38-31.87). CONCLUSIONS: Prior endoscopic dilatations did not increase the risk of esophageal perforation or postoperative complications of Heller myotomy in this cohort of children with achalasia. Mucosal tear was identified as a risk factor for post-operative complications.


Asunto(s)
Dilatación , Acalasia del Esófago , Perforación del Esófago , Esofagoscopía , Miotomía de Heller , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Miotomía de Heller/efectos adversos , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Perforación del Esófago/etiología , Perforación del Esófago/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adolescente , Dilatación/métodos , Preescolar , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/efectos adversos
14.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3636-3644, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769185

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) is increasing, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been frequently performed for its treatment. However, the differences between the characteristics and ESD outcomes between short- and long-segment BEA (SSBEA and LSBEA, respectively) are unclear. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of ESD between both groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 155 superficial BEAs (106 SSBEAs and 49 LSBEAs) treated with ESD in 139 patients and examined their clinicopathological features and ESD outcomes. SSBEA and LSBEA were classified based on whether the maximum length of the background mucosa of BEA was < 3 cm or ≥ 3 cm, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with SSBEA, LSBEA showed significantly higher proportions of cases with the macroscopically flat type (36.7% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001), left wall location (38.8% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001), over half of the tumor circumference (20.4% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), and synchronous lesions (17.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Compared with SSBEA, regarding ESD outcomes, LSBEA showed significantly longer resection duration (91.0 min vs. 60.5 min, p < 0.001); a lower proportion of submucosal invasion (14.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.047), horizontal margin negativity (79.6% vs. 94.3%, p = 0.0089), and R0 resection (69.4% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.024); and a higher proportion of post-procedural stenosis cases (10.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.027). The 5-year cumulative incidence of metachronous cancer in patients without additional treatment was significantly higher for LSBEA than for SSBEA (25.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The clinicopathological features of LSBEA and SSBEA and their treatment outcomes differed in many aspects. As LSBEAs are difficult to diagnose and treat and show a high risk of metachronous cancer development, careful ESD and follow-up or eradication of the remaining BE may be required.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esófago de Barrett , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Masculino , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esofagoscopía/métodos
15.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3503-3519, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782829

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging effective treatment for achalasia. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond well to the treatment. After over a decade of clinical practice, potential risk factors associated with POEM failure have been identified. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence of risk factors for POEM failure. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 10th, 2022. We included English studies that reported POEM outcomes in achalasia patients and identified risk factors for POEM failure. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed using fixed- or randomized-effect models to pool the effect size. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies comprising 9371 patients with achalasia were included in this review. The pooled failure rate was 8% (90% CI 7%-10%). We identified sigmoid esophagus (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.45-2.47), type I achalasia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63), and type III achalasia (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78) were associated with a worse clinical response. Conversely, type II achalasia was associated with a better response (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.75). Prior treatment with Heller myotomy (OR 5.75, 95% CI 3.97-8.34) and prior balloon dilation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.29) were also associated with a higher risk of clinical failure. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis results demonstrated that sigmoid esophagus, manometric achalasia subtype, and prior treatment were associated with POEM failure. This information could be used to guide treatment decisions and improve the success rate of POEM in achalasia patients.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Miotomía , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Humanos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Miotomía/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Miotomía de Heller/métodos
16.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 276-282, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782380

RESUMEN

The endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has evolved significantly in the past 20 years. Current practices include devices specifically designed for GERD. Newer techniques aim to use less extra equipment, to be less costly, and to use accessories readily available in endoscopy units, as well as using standard endoscopes to apply such techniques. It is of utmost importance to properly select the patients for endoscopic therapy, and it should be done in a multidisciplinary approach.


El tratamiento endoscópico de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) ha evolucionado significativamente en los últimos 20 años. Las prácticas actuales incluyen dispositivos diseñados específicamente para la ERGE. Las técnicas más nuevas tienen como objetivo utilizar menos equipos adicionales, ser menos costosos y utilizar accesorios fácilmente disponibles en las unidades de endoscopia, así como utilizar endoscopios estándar para aplicar dichas técnicas. Es de suma importancia seleccionar adecuadamente a los pacientes para la terapia endoscópica, y debe hacerse en un enfoque multidisciplinario.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...