[The transgenerational mechanisms in developmental programming of metabolic diseases]. / Mecanismos transgeneracionales en el desarrollo de enfermedades metabólicas.

Human epidemiological and experimental animal studies have shown that suboptimal environments in the womb and during early neonatal life alter growth and may program offspring susceptibility to lifelong health problems. One of the most interesting and significant feature of developmental programming is the evidence that adverse consequences of altered intrauterine environments can be passed from first generation to second generation offspring. To obtain the transgenerational phenotype, a negative environment is required during fetal or early neonatal life, the physiologic phenotype or disease can be transmitted through the germ line and the subsequent generations are not directly exposed to the environmental factor. The hypothesis has become well accepted by compelling animal studies that define the outcome of specific challenges such as: 1) nutrient restriction or overfeeding during pregnancy and lactation; 2) uterine blood flow restriction; 3) fetal exposure to inappropriately high levels of glucocorticoids, and 4) experimental maternal diabetes. Maternal protein restriction in the rat adversely affects glucose metabolism of male and female second generation offspring in a gender and developmental time window-specific manner. Other studies have proved transgenerational passage of effects resulting from treatment of pregnant rats with dexamethasone by either maternal or paternal lines. First generation female diabetic offspring of F0 rats treated with streptozotocin during pregnancy had F2 offspring with altered glucose and carbohydrate metabolism. The studies suggest that the mechanisms involved in developmental programming are likely epigenetic rather than due to DNA sequence mutations. Many individuals all over the world experience undernutrition, stress, hyperglycemia and other negative environmental factors during pregnancy and/or lactation. Insult during this critical period of development may induce malprogramming and adversely alter not only the F1 generation but also future generations. Preventing or treating these conditions will help to minimize the risk of transmission of metabolic diseases to future generations.

Protein restriction during gestation and/or lactation causes adverse transgenerational effects on biometry and glucose metabolism in F1 and F2 progenies of rats.

Substantial evidence suggests that poor intrauterine milieu elicited by maternal nutritional disturbance may programme susceptibility in the fetus to later development of chronic diseases, such as obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. One of the most interesting features of fetal programming is the evidence from several studies that the consequences may not be limited to the first-generation offspring and that it can be passed transgenerationally. In the present study, female rats (F0) were fed either a normal-protein diet [control diet (C); 19 g of protein/100 g of diet] or a low-protein diet [restricted diet (R); 5 g of protein/100 g of diet]. The offspring were termed according to the period and the types of diet the dams were fed, i.e. CC, RC, CR and RR (first letter indicates the diet during gestation and the second the diet during lactation). At 3 months of age, F1 females were bred to proven males, outside the experiment, to produce F2 offspring. At weaning, F2 offspring were divided by gender. RC1 offspring (with the number indicating the filial generation) were born with low birthweight, but afterwards they had catch-up growth, reaching the weight of the CC1 offspring. The increased glycaemia in RC1 offspring was associated with insulin resistance. CR1 and RR1 offspring had impaired growth with no changes in glucose metabolism. RC2 offspring had high BM (body mass) at birth, which was sustained over the whole experiment in male offspring. The F2 generation had more alteration in glucose metabolism than the F1 generation. CR2 and RC2 offspring had hyperglycaemia accompanied by hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance in both genders. CR2 offspring had an increase in body adiposity with hyperleptinaemia. In conclusion, low protein during gestation improves BM, fat mass and growth rate in F1 rats, but has adverse effects on glucose and leptin metabolism, resulting in insulin resistance in adult F1 and F2 offspring. Low protein during lactation has adverse effects on glucose, insulin and leptin metabolism, resulting in insulin resistance in adult F2 offspring. These findings suggest that low protein during gestation and/or lactation can be passed transgenerationally to the second generation.