RESUMEN
The rate of vascular recanalizations in CLTI is increasing worldwide. Safety and efficacy of surgical versus endovascular treatment in CLTI patients was investigated in 2 prospective randomized trials with contrasting results. The BEST-CLI trial randomized 1830 patients with CLTI, the Bypass versus Angioplasty for Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL-2) trial included 345 patients with CLTI. Best-CLI evaluated outcome events as the primary endpoint, which includes major reinterventions in addition to major amputations and death. Only half of the CLTI patients received a crural intervention or surgery. There were no differences in major amputations or death. After a median follow-up (FU) of 2,7 years, the surgery group showed significantly better results compared to the endovascular group, due to fewer re-interventions. BASIL-2 used amputation-free survival as the primary outcome and only included patients with lower leg lesions. After a median FU of 40 months, endovascular therapy was found to be superior. The extremely high mortality rate was remarkable in both studies. The BEST-CLI study represents CLTI patients only to a limited degree, whereas the BASIL-2 study presents the treatment of CLTI patients with below-the-knee-lesions quite well. Both studies confirm that patients with CLTI should be treated in specialized centers that offer both crural surgery and endovascular therapy. Cardiovascular risk factor management must play a more important role in reducing the high mortality associated with CLTI.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Humanos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/terapia , Isquemia/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is defined as ischemic rest pain or tissue loss (eg, ulceration/gangrene) that has been present for greater than 2 weeks. Workup includes a careful history, physical examination focused on evaluation of pulses and wounds, lower extremity noninvasive vascular studies (eg, ankle-brachial indices, toe pressures), saphenous vein mapping, and imaging of the lower extremity arterial anatomy (eg, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or subtraction angiography) if a revascularization intervention is planned.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/etiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of peripheral artery disease is growing, with millions of people globally suffering its end-stage manifestation, chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Revascularization procedures like lower extremity bypass play a vital role in limb salvage but optimal medical therapy is essential for maximizing the benefit of these procedures and reducing long-term risks of cardiovascular and limb-related events. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with PAD who undergo lower extremity bypass warrant a comprehensive approach to risk factor modification for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and limb-related complications. This includes appropriate use of high-intensity statins, smoking cessation, and management of hypertension and diabetes. Additionally, antiplatelet therapy is indicated for all patients with CLTI and additional treatment with low-dose anticoagulation may also be beneficial. SUMMARY: Optimal medical therapy is essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing lower extremity bypass.
Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Recuperación del Miembro/métodosRESUMEN
Critical Limb Ischemia or chronic limb-threatening ischemia represents the end stage of peripheral artery disease where arterial flow is compromised to the lower extremities and risk of limb loss may become imminent. Revascularization of lower extremities is one of the cornerstones of limb salvage and amputation prevention. Establishing centers of high quality CLI therapy requires creating different foundational pillars in order to be successful. This article discusses critical limb ischemia center creation from the perspective of critical limb ischemia therapists working in an outpatient setting.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Isquemia/terapia , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Crítica , Atención Ambulatoria , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Prestación Integrada de Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the lower limb manifestation of systemic atherosclerotic disease. PAD may initially present with symptoms of intermittent claudication, whilst chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), the end stage of PAD, presents with rest pain and/or tissue loss. PAD is an age-related condition present in over 10% of those aged ≥65 in high-income countries. Guidelines regarding definition, diagnosis and staging of PAD and CLTI have been updated to reflect the changing patterns and presentations of disease given the increasing prevalence of diabetes. Recent research has changed guidelines on optimal medical therapy, with low-dose anticoagulant plus aspirin recommended in some patients. Recently published randomised trials highlight where bypass-first or endovascular-first approaches may be optimal in infra-inguinal disease. New techniques in endovascular surgery have increased minimally invasive options for ever more complex disease. Increasing recognition has been given to the complexity of patients with CLTI where a high prevalence of both frailty and cognitive impairment are present and a significant burden of multi-morbidity and polypharmacy. Despite advances in minimally invasive revascularisation techniques and reduction in amputation incidence, survival remains poor for many with CLTI. Shared decision-making is essential, and conservative management is often appropriate for older patients. There is emerging evidence of the benefit of specialist geriatric team input in the perioperative management of older patients undergoing surgery for CLTI. Recent UK guidelines now recommend screening for frailty, cognitive impairment and delirium in older vascular surgery patients as well as recommending all vascular surgery services have support and input from specialist geriatrics teams.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/epidemiología , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/terapia , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/diagnóstico , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Factores de Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Occlusion after infra-inguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease is a major complication with potentially devastating consequences. In this descriptive analysis, we sought to describe the natural history and explore factors associated with long-term major amputation-free survival following occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass. METHODS: Using a prospective database from a tertiary care vascular center, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent a first-time infra-inguinal bypass and subsequently suffered a graft occlusion (1997-2021). The primary outcome was longitudinal rate of major amputation-free survival after bypass occlusion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to explore predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1318 first-time infra-inguinal bypass surgeries performed over the study period, 255 bypasses occluded and were included in our analysis. Mean age was 66.7 (12.6) years, 40.4% were female, and indication for index bypass was chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in 89.8% (n = 229). 48.2% (n = 123) of index bypass conduits used great saphenous vein, 29.0% (n = 74) prosthetic graft, and 22.8% (n = 58) an alternative conduit. Median (interquartile range) time to bypass occlusion was 6.8 (2.3-19.0) months, and patients were followed for median of 4.3 (1.7-8.1) years after bypass occlusion. Following occlusion, 38.04% underwent no revascularization, 32.94% graft salvage procedure, 25.1% new bypass, and 3.92% native artery recanalization. Major amputation-free survival following occlusion was 56.9% (50.6%-62.8%) at 1 y, 37.1% (31%-43.3%) at 5 y, and 17.2% (11.9%-23.2%) at 10 y. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower amputation-free survival were older age, female sex, advanced cardiorenal comorbidities, CLTI at index procedure, CLTI at time of occlusion, and distal index bypass outflow. Initial treatment after occlusion with both a new surgical bypass (HR 0.44, CI: 0.29-0.67) or a graft salvage procedure (HR 0.56, CI: 0.38-0.82) showed improved amputation-free survival. One-year rate of major amputation or death were 59.8% (50.0%-69.6%) for those who underwent no revascularization, 37.9% (28.7%-49.0%) for graft salvage, and 26.7% (17.6%-39.5%) for new bypass. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term major amputation-free survival is low after occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass. While several nonmodifiable risk factors were associated with lower amputation-free survival, treatment after graft occlusion with either a new bypass or a graft salvage procedure may improve longitudinal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/epidemiología , Recuperación del Miembro/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Injerto Vascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a collagen disease with immune abnormalities, vasculopathy, and fibrosis. Ca blockers and prostaglandins are used to treat peripheral circulatory disturbances. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a disease characterized by extremity ulcers, necrosis, and pain due to limb ischemia. Since only a few patients present with coexistence of CLTI and SSc, the treatment outcomes of revascularization in these cases are unknown. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of seven patients with CLTI and SSc, and 35 patients with uncomplicated CLTI who were hospitalized from 2012 to 2022. A higher proportion of patients with uncomplicated CLTI had diabetes and male. There were no significant differences in the age at which ischemic ulceration occurred, other comorbidities, or in treatments, including antimicrobial agents, revascularization and amputation, improvement of pain, and the survival time from ulcer onset between the two subgroups. EVT or amputation was performed in six or two of the seven patients with CLTI and SSc, respectively. Among those who underwent EVT, 33% (2/6) achieved epithelialization and 67% (4/6) experienced pain relief. These results suggest that the revascularization in cases with CLTI and SSc should consider factors such as infection and general condition, since revascularization improve the pain of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapia , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/complicaciones , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/etiología , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/diagnóstico , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/terapia , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Estudios Retrospectivos , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/terapia , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In India, a significant scarcity of published data exists regarding chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and its management, especially among the elderly population. CLTI, often accompanied by frailty poses a significant healthcare challenge. While endovascular interventions offer hope, there remains a dearth of outcome data for this age group. This study seeks to address this critical gap by investigating the impact of frailty on outcomes, emphasizing amputation-free survival (AFS), wound healing, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Our study included 131 elderly CLTI patients aged ≥70 years who underwent infrainguinal endovascular interventions between April 2018 and August 2021, with a follow-up period of 2 years. Among the patients, 93.9% had diabetes mellitus and 82.4% had hypertension. Clinical frailty was assessed using the clinical frailty scale (CFS). Patients were categorized into group 1 (CFS 1-5) and group 2 (CFS 6-9). Primary outcomes were AFS, wound healing, HRQoL, and their association with frailty. Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure-related complications, major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, vessel patency, re-intervention rates, and mortality rates including periprocedural and overall mortality. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 86.3% of patients, with frailty significantly influencing this outcome. Group 2 exhibited reduced technical success (80.8%) compared to group 1 (93.1%). The major amputation rate was 9.2%, with higher rates in group 2 [univariate hazard ratio: 5.20; P = 0.033]. Similarly, group 2 showed elevated overall mortality [univariate hazard ratio: 5.18; P < 0.001]. AFS at 1 and 2 years were 67.9% and 55%, respectively, with higher rates in group 1. Wound healing was achieved in 76.1% of patients (83/109), with frailty significantly associated with delayed wound healing (P < 0.001). Vessel patency at 1 year was observed in 88.8% of patients. HRQoL significantly improved postintervention, with vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 (VascuQol-6) scores increasing from an average of 9 of 24 at baseline to 20 of 24 at 2 years. Frailty score significantly correlated with VascuQol-6 scores at 1 and 2 years (P < 0.0012). Group 1 exhibited higher VascuQol-6 scores than group 2, indicating improved HRQoL during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Successful endovascular treatments in high-risk CLTI patients promote improved wound healing and post-treatment quality of life. Frailty should be assessed before endovascular interventions as it correlates with adverse outcomes, including amputations and mortality. While revascularization holds promise, caution is advised for frailer patients, emphasizing the importance of personalized care and tailored treatments for elderly CLTI patients.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Calidad de Vida , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/mortalidad , Fragilidad/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Edad , Evaluación Geriátrica , India , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infra-popliteal interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) can be impacted by the morphology of the tibial vessels. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a novel morphology-driven classification on the outcomes of isolated tibial intervention for CLTI. METHODS: A database of patients undergoing isolated tibial interventions for CLTI at a single center between 2010 and 2020 was retrospectively queried. Patients with isolated infra-popliteal disease were identified, and their anatomy was scored as present or absent for lesion calcification (1 point), target vessel diameter<3.0 mm (1 point), lesion length>300 mm (1 point), and poor pedal runoff score (1 point). Patients were then divided into 3 groups: low risk (0 or 1 points), moderate risk (2 points), and high risk (3 or 4 points). Intention to treat analysis by the patient was performed. Limb-based patency (the absence of reintervention, occlusion, critical stenosis [>70%], or hemodynamic compromise with ongoing symptoms of CLTI as it related to the patency of the preoperatively determined target artery pathway) was assessed. Patient-oriented outcomes of amputation-free survival (AFS; survival without major amputation) and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE; above ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention: new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision) were evaluated. RESULTS: 1,607 patients (55% male, average age 60 years, 3,846 vessels) underwent tibial intervention for CLTI. The majority of the patients were diabetic and of Hispanic origin. Morphologically, 27%, 31%, and 42% of the vessels were categorized as low risk, moderate risk, and high risk, respectively. There was a significant worsening of the infra-popliteal Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grading as the morphological risk increased. The 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were equivalent across the groups and were under the stated objective performance goal (OPG) of ≤10%. In contrast, both the 30-day MALE and the 30-day major amputations were significantly different across the groups, with the low-risk group remaining under the OPG of ≤9% and ≤4%, respectively, while the moderate risk and high risk exceeded the goal threshold. For the OPG, freedom from MALE was 60 ± 5%, 46 ± 5%, and 22 ± 9% at 5 years for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (mean ± standard error of the mean; P = 0.008). Overall AFS was 55 ± 5%, 37 ± 6%, and 18 ± 7% at 5 years for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (mean ± standard error of the mean; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Tibial anatomic morphology impacts isolated tibial endovascular intervention with adverse morphology associated with poorer short- and long-term outcomes. Risk stratification based on anatomic predictors should be an additional consideration as one intervenes on infra-popliteal vessels for CLTI.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Bases de Datos Factuales , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Arterias Tibiales , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Arterias Tibiales/fisiopatología , Arterias Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Tibiales/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients aged ≥ 80 years and < 80 years. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of 789 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2021. The end points were 2-year overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 200 patients aged < 80 years underwent bypass surgery (BSX), and 205 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 294 patients aged < 80 years underwent endovascular therapy (EVT). Before the propensity score matching, multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 80 years, lower body mass index and serum albumin levels, nonambulatory status, and end-stage renal disease were independent risk factors for 2-year mortality in the BSX and EVT groups. After propensity score matching, the 2-year OS was better in the < 80 years cohort than in the ≥ 80 years cohort in both the BSX and EVT groups (P = 0.018 and P = 0.035, respectively). There was no difference in the 2-year LS rates between the < 80 years and the ≥ 80 years cohorts in both the BSX and EVT groups (P = 0.621 and P = 0.287, respectively). According to the number of risk factors, except for age ≥ 80 years, there was no difference in the 2-year AFS rates between the < 80 years and ≥ 80 years cohorts for the BSX and EVT groups with 0-1 risk factor (P = 0.957 and P = 0.655, respectively). However, the 2-year AFS rate was poor, especially in the ≥ 80 years cohort in the BSX with 2-4 risk factors (P = 0.015). The Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV complication rates tended to be higher in the ≥ 80 years cohort than in the < 80 years cohort only in the BSX with 2-4 risk factors (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLTI aged ≥ 80 years had poorer OS than those aged < 80 years. However, there was no difference in LS between the ≥ 80 years and < 80 years cohorts in both the BSX and EVT groups. Although age ≥ 80 years was associated with poorer OS, patients with 0-1 risk factor may benefit from revascularization, including BSX, because no difference was observed in AFS or Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV complications.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Medición de Riesgo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/terapia , Isquemia/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inflammation is a key element in the initiation and progression of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Understanding the impact of inflammatory molecules, as cytokines in PAD could help us to improve the prognosis of these patients. The main goal of this study was to compare the serum level of cytokines between patients with claudication to those with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The second objective was to evaluate the relationship between the levels of cytokines and death or amputation rate. METHODS: An observational, single-center, and prospective study was conducted from January 2018 to July 2022. The study was approved by the ethical commission of the Local Hospital (75/2017). Patients with PAD, suggested by the clinical history and objective examination and confirmed with ankle-brachial index, attending vascular surgery consultations of the first author were included. The following exclusion criteria were applied: i) bedridden individuals or subjects who refused to participate in the protocol; ii) diseases responsible for body composition changes or proinflammatory state; iii) recent diet change, iv) active malignancy, v) autoimmune disease, vi) active infection, vii) chronic renal failure (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), or viii) heart failure in the past 3 months. This cohort was observed at admission, 3, 6, and 12 months. A panel of 27 cytokines was determined with ELISA, at baseline. RESULTS: We included 119 subjects (mean age: 67.58 ± 9.60 years old; 79.80% males), 65 patients with claudication and 54 with CLTI. From the 27 cytokines analyzed, patients with CLTI, when compared to those with claudication, had a higher serum level of 11 cytokines: IL1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL12 p70, G-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, PDGF-ß, RANTES, and TNF-α. From the group of patients with CLTI those who underwent a major amputation had a higher serum level of FGF-basic [median = 49.04; interquartile range = 37.03-52.49; versus median = 33.04; interquartile range = 28.60-38.98; P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLTI have higher serum level of inflammatory cytokines, which may have role in the prognosis of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Biomarcadores , Citocinas , Mediadores de Inflamación , Claudicación Intermitente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Masculino , Citocinas/sangre , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/sangre , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Claudicación Intermitente/sangre , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Claudicación Intermitente/inmunología , Factores de Tiempo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/sangre , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Regulación hacia Arriba , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Recuperación del Miembro , Isquemia/sangre , Isquemia/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different endovascular revascularisation procedures for treating chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) using network meta-analysis (NMA). DATA SOURCES: The databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were searched on 14 March 2023. REVIEW METHODS: A NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy of different endovascular revascularisation techniques for treating CLTI was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary and secondary outcomes were major amputation and death, respectively. Random effects models were developed and the results were presented using surface under the cumulative ranking curve plots and forest plots. A p value of ≤ .050 was considered statistically significant. The Cochrane collaborative tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 2 655 participants of whom 94.8% had CLTI were included. Eleven trials compared plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) vs. drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty (n = 1 771), five trials compared bare metal stent (BMS) vs. drug coated stent (DCS) (n = 466), three trials compared atherectomy vs. DCB (n = 194), two trials compared PBA vs. BMS (n = 70), one trial compared PBA vs. atherectomy (n = 50), and one trial compared BMS vs. DCB (n = 104). None of the revascularisation strategies significantly reduced the risk of major amputation or death compared with PBA. Using the network estimates, GRADE certainty of evidence for improvement in major amputation outcomes for DCB was moderate, for atherectomy and BMS was low, and for DCS was very low compared with PBA. Risk of bias was low in 16 trials, of some concerns in six trials, and high in one trial, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is no current evidence from RCTs to reliably conclude that BMS, DCB, DCS, or atherectomy are superior to PBA in preventing major amputation and death in patients with CLTI. Larger comparative RCTs are needed to identify the best endovascular revascularisation strategy.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Metaanálisis en Red , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Stents , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are regarded as one of the frailest patient groups among the chronic limb-threatening ischaemia population with high perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. As a result, alternative vein bypass surgery in the absence of sufficient great saphenous vein is often not considered as a potential treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the results of octogenarians undergoing alternative vein bypass surgery due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia to younger patients. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing bypass surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia with alternative autologous vein grafts between 1997 and 2018 was performed. Patients aged over 80 years were compared with those under 80 years. Graft patency rates were assessed and a risk factor analysis for limb loss was performed. RESULTS: In total, 592 patients underwent bypass surgery during the study interval. Twenty-one per cent (n = 126) of patients were 80 years or older. At 4 years, primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency as well as limb salvage rates were not significantly different between the two groups (46% versus 50%, 60% versus 66%, 69% versus 72%, 72% versus 77%, for octogenarians versus non-octogenarians respectively). Major amputations were performed in 27 (21%) octogenarians and 91 (20%) non-octogenarians (P = 0.190). No higher 30-day and long-term mortality rates nor morbidity rates were detected in the octogenarian group with a median follow-up time of 27 (interquartile range 12-56) months. Minor amputation, the reason for alternative vein grafts, as well as the profunda femoris artery as proximal origin of the bypass were risk factors for limb loss in the postoperative course. CONCLUSION: Alternative vein bypass surgery in octogenarians with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia is safe and effective in terms of patency rates, limb salvage and survival compared with younger patients in the absence of sufficient great saphenous vein. Age alone should not be a deterrent from performing bypass surgery.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Recuperación del Miembro , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Vena Safena/trasplante , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Edad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We developed a patient decision aid to enhance patient participation in amputation level decision making when there is a choice between a transmetatarsal or transtibial amputation. METHODS: In accordance with International Patient Decision Aid Standards, we developed an amputation level patient decision aid for patients who are being considered for either a transmetatarsal or transtibial amputation, incorporating qualitative literature data, quantitative literature data, qualitative provider and patient interviews, expert panel input and iterative patient feedback. RESULTS: The rapid qualitative literature review and qualitative interviews identified five domains outcome priority domains important to patients facing amputation secondary to chronic limb threatening ischemia: 1) the ability to walk, 2) healing and risk for reamputation, 3) rehabilitation program intensity, 4) ease of prosthetic use, and 5) limb length after amputation. The rapid quantitative review identified only two domains with adequate evidence comparing differences in outcomes between the two amputation levels: mobility and reamputation. Patient, surgeon, rehabilitation and decision aid expert feedback allowed us to integrate critical facets of the decision including addressing the emotional context of loss of limb, fear and anxiety as an obstacle to decision making, shaping the decision in the context of remaining life years, and how to facilitate patient knowledge of value tradeoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Amputation level choice is associated with significant outcome trade-offs. The AMPDECIDE patient decision aid can facilitate acknowledgment of patient fears, enhance knowledge of amputation level outcomes, assist patients in determining their personal outcome priorities, and facilitate shared amputation level decision making.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Humanos , Amputación Quirúrgica/psicología , Amputación Quirúrgica/rehabilitación , Participación del Paciente , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/etiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with a high risk of amputation, yet patients undergoing amputation due to CLTI have little knowledge of the amputation process and the rehabilitation that awaits. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate information material for patients undergoing amputation. METHODS: Nine participants were included in the study. Two focus group interviews were performed with seven patients who had undergone lower extremity amputation due to CLTI within the past 2 y. Additionally, two individual interviews were carried out. A semistructured interview guide was used, and the interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis with a deductive approach. RESULTS: Three themes were identified as essential for the design of the written information: Perspectives on design and formatting, Providing information to enhance participation in care, and Accessibility to information and support. The prototyped information leaflet was perceived as acceptable, useable, relevant, and comprehensible by the participants. CONCLUSIONS: For patients to actively engage in their care, it is vital that their information needs are met and that they are provided with psychosocial support when needed. Written and oral information should be provided by a trusted healthcare professional.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Grupos Focales , Extremidad Inferior , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Amputación Quirúrgica/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Entrevistas como Asunto , Folletos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes after major lower-limb amputation have been historically poor. The current care provided to most amputees is often disorganized and without physician supervision. The primary purpose of this study is to examine rates of postamputation mobility achieved with a prosthesis by patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and/or diabetes who required major lower-limb amputation and were treated under an established physician-led collaborative care pathway. The secondary purpose is to describe the structure and utilization of the care pathway by multiple independent vascular surgery practices in the United States to enable future exploration of its impact on key clinical outcomes within this patient population. METHODS: Clinical records of 2,475 patients from 6 vascular practices that adopted this collaborative care pathway between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Only records with sufficient documented histories of amputation surgeries, prosthetic services, and mobility status were included. RESULTS: Of 2,475 patient records reviewed, 1,787 patients (2,157 major amputations) were eligible for analysis. Sixty-two-point 2 percent (n = 1,111) of patients achieved mobility with the collaborative care pathway. Mobility rate varied by amputation level in the study. Prosthetic mobility was achieved in 73.5% of transtibial amputations, 40.4% of transfemoral amputations, and 35.7% of through-knee amputations, regardless of patient laterality, which is superior or equivalent to the best published rates of mobility. CONCLUSIONS: The study describes the structure and utilization of a physician-led collaborative care pathway for treating patients who require lower-limb amputation that meets 5 of the 7 recommendations from the 2019 Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia. Internal data analysis results suggest that patients treated via this care pathway can potentially achieve improved mobility rates with a prosthesis following amputation. This collaborative care pathway should be further evaluated for its ability to directly improve mobility and other clinically relevant amputation outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Amputados , Miembros Artificiales , Extremidad Inferior , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Recuperación de la Función , Conducta Cooperativa , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Limitación de la Movilidad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estado Funcional , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular complications after revascularization to treat chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are a major concern that guides treatment. Our goal was to assess periprocedural cardiac and vascular serious adverse events (SAEs) in the Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial. METHODS: BEST-CLI was a prospective randomized trial comparing surgical (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) revascularization for patients with CLTI. Thirty-day SAEs, classified as cardiac or vascular, were analyzed. Adverse events are defined as serious when they affect safety in the trial, require prolonged hospitalization, result in significant disability or incapacitation, are life-threatening, or result in death. Interventions were analyzed in a per protocol fashion. RESULTS: In the BEST-CLI trial, 850 OPEN and 896 ENDO interventions were evaluated. Forty (4.7%) and 34 (3.8%) patients experienced at least one cardiac SAE after OPEN and ENDO intervention, respectively (P = .35). Overall, there were 53 cardiac SAEs (0.06 per patient) after OPEN and 40 (0.045 per patient) after ENDO interventions. Cardiac SAEs in the OPEN arm were classified as related to ischemia (50.9%), arrhythmias (17%), heart failure (15.1%), arrest (13.2%), and heart block (3.8%); in the ENDO arm, they were classified as ischemia (47.5%), heart failure (17.5%), arrhythmias (15%), arrest (15%), and heart block (5%). Approximately half of SAEs were classified as severe for both OPEN and ENDO. SAEs were definitely or probably related to the procedure in 30.2% and 25% in the OPEN and ENDO arms, respectively (P = .2). Vascular SAEs occurred in 58 (6.8%) and 86 (9.6%) of patients after OPEN and ENDO revascularization, respectively (P = .19). In total, there were 59 (0.07 per patient) and 87 (0.097 per patient) vascular SAEs after OPEN and ENDO procedures. Vascular SAEs in the OPEN arm were classified as distal ischemia/infection (44.1%), bleeding (16.9%), occlusive (15.3%), thromboembolic (15.3%), cerebrovascular (5.1%), and other (3.4%); in the ENDO arm, they were distal ischemia/infection (40.2%), occlusive (31%), bleeding (12.6%), thromboembolic (8%), cerebrovascular (1.1%), and other (4.6%). SAEs were classified as severe for OPEN in 45.8% and ENDO in 46%. SAEs were definitely or probably related to the procedure in 23.7% and 35.6% in the OPEN and ENDO arms (P = .35), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing OPEN and ENDO revascularization experienced similar degrees of cardiac and vascular SAEs. The majority were not related to the index intervention, but approximately half were severe.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the influence of inframalleolar (IM) P0/P1 on wound healing in bypass surgery vs endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. IM P represents target artery crossing into foot, with intact pedal arch (P0) and absent or severely diseased pedal arch (P1). The endpoints were wound healing, limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 66 and 189 propensity score-matched pairs in the IM P0 and IM P1 cohorts, respectively. In the IM P0 cohort, the 1-year wound healing rates were 94.5% and 85.7% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .092), whereas those in the IM P1 cohort were 86.2% and 66.2% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P < .001). In the IM P0 cohort, the 2-year LS rates were 96.7% and 94.1% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .625), and those in the IM P1 cohort were 91.8% and 81.5% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .004). No significant differences were observed between the bypass surgery and EVT in terms of postoperative complication rates in either the IM P0 or P1 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass surgery facilitated better wound healing and LS than EVT in patients with IM P1. Conversely, no differences in wound healing or LS were observed between groups in patients with IM P0. Bypass surgery should be considered a better revascularization strategy than EVT in patients with tissue loss and IM P1 disease.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Inframalleolar disease is present in most diabetic patients presenting with tissue loss. Inframalleolar (pedal) artery disease and pedal medial arterial calcification (pMAC) are associated with major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). This study aimed to examine the impact of pMAC on the outcomes after isolated inframalleolar (pedal artery) interventions. METHODS: A database of lower extremity endovascular intervention for patients with tissue loss between 2007 and 2022 was retrospectively queried. Patients with CLTI were selected, and those undergoing isolated inframalleolar intervention on the dorsalis pedis and medial and lateral tarsal arteries and who had foot x-rays were identified. X-rays were assessed blindly for pMAC and scored on a scale of 0 to 5. Patients with concomitant superficial femoral artery and tibial interventions were excluded. Intention to treat analysis by the patient was performed. Amputation-free survival (survival without major amputation) was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (51% female; 87% Hispanic; average age, 66 years; 323 vessels) underwent isolated infra-malleolar intervention for tissue loss. All patients had diabetes, 96% had hypertension, 79% had hyperlipidemia, and 63% had chronic renal insufficiency (55% of these were on hemodialysis). Most of the patients had Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage 3 disease and had various stages of pMAC: severe (score = 5) in 48%, moderate (score = 2-4) in 31%, and mild (score = 0-1) in 21% of the patients. Technical success was 94%, with a median of one vessel treated per patient. All failures were in severe pMAC. Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events was 0.9% at 90 days after the procedure. Following the intervention, most patients underwent a planned forefoot amputation (single digit, multiple digits, ray amputation, or trans-metatarsal amputation). WIfI ischemic grade was improved by 51%. Wound healing at 3 months was 69%. Those not healing underwent below-knee amputations. The overall 5-year amputation-free survival rate was 35% ± 9%. The severity of pMAC was associated with decreased AFS. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing severity of pMAC influences the technical and long-term outcomes of infra-malleolar intervention in diabetes. Severe pMAC is associated with amputation and should be considered as a variable in the shared decision-making of diabetic patients with CLTI.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/mortalidad , Calcificación Vascular/complicaciones , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Calcificación Vascular/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Our study aimed to assess the influence of incorporating new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy on clinical outcomes among patients who underwent endovascular intervention for below-the-knee (BTK) occlusions necessitating reintervention. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and had undergone a successful endovascular intervention for BTK artery occlusion, necessitating reintervention. Patients who underwent endovascular interventions for BTK reocclusion were compared to those who received dual-pathway inhibition with NOAC (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg 2 × 1) and clopidogrel (NOAC group), or dual-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin (DAPT group). The primary endpoints were target vessel reocclusion and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at the 1-year follow-up, while major and minor amputations served as the secondary endpoint. Additionally, a one-year comparison was conducted between the two groups for major bleeding events. 64 patients in our clinic treated with endovascular reintervention (NOAC = 28, DAPT = 34). The TLR rate is 10.7% in NOAC group (N = 3) and 32.4% in DAPT group (N = 11, p = 0.043). The target vessel reocclusion rate is 17.8% in NOAC group (N = 5) and 41.2% in DAPT group (N = 14, p = 0.048). Minor or major amputation rate at 1-year follow-up was 3.6% in NOAC group (N = 1) and 11.7% in DAPT group (N = 4, p = 0.245). The patency rate is significantly higher, and the TLR rate is significantly lower in the NOAC group compared to the DAPT group, with no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Although no statistically significant difference exists in amputation rates, a numerical distinction is evident.