Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Vet Rec ; 187(8): 327-328, 2020 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060242

RESUMEN

Gillian Nevin argues that vets would be unfairly disadvantaged if the RCVS changes to a civil standard of proof in disciplinary cases.


Asunto(s)
Legislación Veterinaria/normas , Sociedades Veterinarias/organización & administración , Veterinarios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Legislación Veterinaria/organización & administración , Reino Unido
3.
Vet Rec ; 186(2): 43, 2020 01 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31953270
7.
PLoS One ; 10(12): e0144533, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26656893

RESUMEN

Biosecurity is crucial for safeguarding livestock from infectious diseases. Despite the plethora of biosecurity recommendations, published scientific evidence on the effectiveness of individual biosecurity measures is limited. The objective of this study was to assess the perception of Swiss experts about the effectiveness and importance of individual on-farm biosecurity measures for cattle and swine farms (31 and 30 measures, respectively). Using a modified Delphi method, 16 Swiss livestock disease specialists (8 for each species) were interviewed. The experts were asked to rank biosecurity measures that were written on cards, by allocating a score from 0 (lowest) to 5 (highest). Experts ranked biosecurity measures based on their importance related to Swiss legislation, feasibility, as well as the effort required for implementation and the benefit of each biosecurity measure. The experts also ranked biosecurity measures based on their effectiveness in preventing an infectious agent from entering and spreading on a farm, solely based on transmission characteristics of specific pathogens. The pathogens considered by cattle experts were those causing Bluetongue (BT), Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD), Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR). Swine experts expressed their opinion on the pathogens causing African Swine Fever (ASF), Enzootic Pneumonia (EP), Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), as well as FMD. For cattle farms, biosecurity measures that improve disease awareness of farmers were ranked as both most important and most effective. For swine farms, the most important and effective measures identified were those related to animal movements. Among all single measures evaluated, education of farmers was perceived by the experts to be the most important and effective for protecting both Swiss cattle and swine farms from disease. The findings of this study provide an important basis for recommendation to farmers and policy makers.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Testimonio de Experto , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/normas , Animales , Bovinos , Técnica Delphi , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Legislación Veterinaria/normas , Porcinos , Suiza , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos , Medicina Veterinaria/normas
9.
Vet Rec ; 174(6): 148-9, 2014 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24509394

RESUMEN

Veterinary practice and research are regulated through legislation, but current interpretation of this is threatening the advantages this research could bring for animals and the profession, says Nick Jeffery.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Legislación Veterinaria/normas , Medicina Veterinaria , Animales , Humanos , Reino Unido
10.
BMC Vet Res ; 10: 35, 2014 Feb 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24495664

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anaesthesia is mandatory for disbudding and castrating calves and lambs of any age, in Switzerland. According to the "anaesthesia delegation model" (ADM), anaesthesia for disbudding calves <3 weeks of age and castrating calves and lambs <2 weeks of age may be administered by certified farmers. Experience with this unique model is not available. The aim was to evaluate the experience of the veterinary practitioners with the ADM. The response rate was 42%. The survey consisted of one questionnaire for each procedure. Procedure I was the delegation of anaesthesia for disbudding calves and procedures II and III were anaesthesia for castrating calves and lambs. RESULTS: Procedure I was performed with local anaesthesia in all farms of 51.8% of the veterinary practices, while this was only 39.3% and 7.6% for procedures II and III (p < 0.001). Anaesthesia for procedure I was administered technically correctly by farmers in at least 66% of the farms of 58.3% of the practitioners, while this was 45.4% and only 23.6% for procedures II and III (p < 0.001). The ADM was assessed as a moderate to very good model to reinforce the legal obligations for procedures I, II, or III by 74.8%, 76.5% and 62.0% of the veterinary practitioners (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The delegation of anaesthesia to certified farmers may be a promising model to reinforce the obligation to provide local anaesthesia for disbudding and castrating calves, but to a lesser extent for castrating lambs.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/veterinaria , Cuernos/cirugía , Legislación Veterinaria/normas , Orquiectomía/veterinaria , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Bienestar del Animal , Animales , Bovinos , Certificación , Masculino , Propiedad , Dolor/prevención & control , Dolor/veterinaria , Ovinos , Suiza , Medicina Veterinaria/instrumentación , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA