Nocardia brasiliensis Pyomyositis in an Immunocompetent Patient Following Gardening Activity.

Nocardia pyomyositis in immunocompetent patients is a rare occurrence. The diagnosis may be missed or delayed with the risk of progressive infection and suboptimal or inappropriate treatment. We present the case of a 48-year-old immunocompetent firefighter diagnosed with pyomyositis caused by Nocardia brasiliensis acquired by direct skin inoculation from gardening activity. The patient developed a painful swelling on his right forearm that rapidly progressed proximally and deeper into the underlying muscle layer. Ultrasound imaging of his right forearm showed a 7-mm subcutaneous fluid collection with surrounding edema. Microbiologic analysis of the draining pus was confirmed to be N brasiliensis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry. After incision and drainage deep to the muscle layer to evacuate the abscess and a few ineffective antibiotic options, the patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone and oral linezolid for 6 weeks. He was then de-escalated to oral moxifloxacin for an additional 4 months to complete a total antibiotic treatment duration of 6 months. The wound healed satisfactorily and was completely closed by the fourth month of antibiotic therapy. Six months after discontinuation of antibiotics, the patient continued to do well with complete resolution of the infection. In this article, we discussed the risk factors for Nocardia in immunocompetent settings, the occupational risks for Nocardia in our index patient, and the challenges encountered with diagnosis and treatment. Nocardia should be included in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous infections, particularly if there is no improvement of "cellulitis" with traditional antimicrobial regimens and the infection extends into the deeper muscle tissues.

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid to ventilator-associated pneumonia in Colombia.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Due to the increase in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, it is important to consider other more effective and safer alternatives compared to vancomycin. This motivates evaluating whether the use of an apparently more expensive drug such as linezolid can be cost-effective in Colombia. METHODS: A decision tree was used to simulate the results in terms of the cost and proportion of cured patients. In the simulation, patients can receive antibiotic treatment with linezolid (LZD 600 mg IV/12 h) or vancomycin (VCM 15 mg/kg iv/12 h) for 7 days, patients they can experience events adverse (renal failure and thrombocytopenia). The model was analyzed probabilistically, and a value of information analysis was conducted to inform the value of conducting further research to reduce current uncertainties in the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US$5180. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost of LZD versus VCM is US$-517. This suggests that LZD is less costly. The proportion of patients cured when treated with LZD compared with VCM is 53 vs. 43%, respectively. The mean incremental benefit of LZD versus VCM is 10 This position of absolute dominance (LZD has lower costs and higher proportion of clinical cure than no supplementation) is unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. There is uncertainty with a 0.999 probability that LZD is more cost-effective than VCM. Our base-case results were robust to variations in all assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSION: LNZ is a cost-effective strategy for patients, ≥ 18 years of age, with VAP in Colombia- Our study provides evidence that can be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.

Linezolid and vancomycin for nosocomial infections in pediatric patients: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old. DATA SOURCES: This is a systematic review in which five randomized clinical trials about the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin, involving a total of 429 children with nosocomial infections, were evaluated. They were searched in scientific databases: PubMed, Bvs, and SciELO. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: The main nosocomial infections that affected children were bacteremia, skin, and soft tissue infections followed by nosocomial pneumonia. Most infections were caused by Gram-positive bacteria, which all studies showed infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci strains being isolated. Both linezolid and vancomycin showed high therapeutic efficacy against different types of nosocomial infections, ranging from 84.4% to 94% for linezolid and 76.9% to 90% for vancomycin. Patients receiving linezolid had lower rates of rash and red man syndrome compared to those receiving vancomycin. However, despite the adverse reactions, antimicrobials can be safely administered to children to treat nosocomial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. CONCLUSION: Both linezolid and vancomycin showed good efficacy in the treatment of bacterial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria in hospitalized children. However, linezolid stands out regarding its pharmacological safety. Importantly, to strengthen this conclusion, further clinical trials are needed to provide additional evidence.

Fierce poison to others: the phenomenon of bacterial dependence on antibiotics.

Beyond the development of resistance, the effects of antibiotics on bacteria and microbial communities are complex and far from exhaustively studied. In the context of the current global antimicrobial resistance crisis, understanding the adaptive and physiological responses of bacteria to antimicrobials is of paramount importance along with the development of new therapies. Bacterial dependence on antibiotics is a phenomenon in which antimicrobials instead of eliminating the pathogens actually provide a boost for their growth. This trait comprises an extreme example of the complexities of responses elicited by microorganisms to these drugs. This compelling evolutionary trait was readily described along with the first wave of antibiotics use and dependence to various antimicrobials has been reported. Nevertheless, current molecular characterizations have been focused on dependence on vancomycin, linezolid and colistin, three critically important antibiotics frequently used as last resource therapy for multi resistant pathogens. Outstanding advances have been made in understanding the molecular basis for the dependence to vancomycin, including specific mutations involved. Regarding linezolid and colistin, the general physiological components affected by the dependence, namely ribosomes and membrane function respectively, have been established. Nonetheless the implications of antibiotic dependence in clinically relevant features, such as virulence, epidemics, relationship with development of resistance, diagnostics and therapy effectiveness require clarification. This review presents a brief introduction of the phenomenon of bacterial dependence to antibiotics and a summary on early and current research concerning the basis for this trait. Furthermore, the available information on the effect of dependence in key clinical aspects is discussed. The studies performed so far underline the need to fully disclose the biological and clinical significance of this trait in pathogens to successfully assess its role in resistance and to design adjusted therapies.

Mucoid Staphylococcus haemolyticus: an unheeded multidrug-resistant pathogen.

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) are among the most abundant members of human skin microbiome. CoNS have lately been recognized as substantial agents in plethora of infections, especially nosocomial infections in preterm infants and immunocompromised patients. Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the second most common species isolated from blood, and identification is further hindered when there is a deviation in morphology from the classical one. Here, we report an uncommon case of multidrug resistant mucoid S. hemolyticus isolated from blood in a patient of polytrauma. The patient was managed with ceftriaxone-sulbactam, gentamicin, and meropenem as empirical therapy, which was subsequently changed to intravenous vancomycin. The patient showed favorable response to treatment. Mucoid isolates are known to be more virulent and multi-drug resistant than the classical morphotypes. We also conducted systematic review to decipher the prevalence of mucoid S. hemolyticus and linezolid (LZD) resistance in the same. This case highlights the significance of awareness of mucoid phenotypes of Gram-positive cocci for clinical microbiologists to reach accurate identification. Resistance to LZD further underscores the need of restriction policies in hospitals and to roll out antimicrobial stewardship program stringently, so that the growing resistance could be contained.

Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients with bloodstream infection obtained in two time periods.

Background: In recent years Staphylococcus epidermidis has been considered an important and frequent causative agent of health care-associated infections (HAIs), increasing the costs of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation are the most important obstacles in the treatment of infections caused by this microorganism. The aim of this work was to determine the most prevalent STs, as well as the antibiotic resistance profile and biofilm formation of S. epidermidis clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in two hospitals in Acapulco, Guerrero in two time periods. Methods: Twenty methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis strains isolated from patients with bacteremia in two hospitals in two time periods were analyzed. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility were performed using the Vitek automated system. Molecular confirmation of the identification and methicillin resistance was performed by duplex PCR of the mecA and nuc genes. Biofilm production was analyzed, and the clonal origin was determined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Results: We identified 14 antibiotic resistance profiles as well as 13 sequence types (ST), including the new ST761. We also found that ST2 and ST23 were the most prevalent and, together with ST59, were found in both time periods. Seventeen of our clinical isolates were multidrug-resistant, but all of them were sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin, and this was not related to biofilm production. Additionally, we standardized a duplex PCR to identify methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis strains. In conclusion, S. epidermidis STs 2, 23, and 59 were found in both time periods. This study is the first report of S. epidermidis ST761. The clinical isolates obtained in this work showed a high multidrug resistance that is apparently not related to biofilm production.

Risk Factors Associated with Failure of Linezolid Therapy in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Referral Center in Mexico.

We aimed to assess the factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREf) bloodstream infection (BSI) who received treatment with linezolid in an 11-year retrospective cohort of patients with VREf BSI. A univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine 30-day mortality factors. Moreover, a Cox proportional hazards analysis of predictor covariates of mortality was performed. Eighty patients were included in the final analysis; 42 (53%) died and 38 (47%) survived 30 days after the index bacteremia. Thirteen patients of 42 (31%) died in the first 7 days. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.76; p < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis. Moreover, VREf BSI persisting for more than 48 hours was a strong factor related to 30-day mortality (aOR, 19.6; 95% CI: 1.46-263; p = 0.01). Adequate control of infection source showed a trend to be protective without reaching significance in the multivariate analysis (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04-1.0; p = 0.05). The Cox proportional hazards analysis confirmed the same significant mortality predictor besides linezolid treatment within the first 48 hours as a protective factor (hazard ratio 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.92, p = 0.02). Severely ill patients with high APACHE II score and persistent bacteremia have a higher risk of failure with linezolid therapy.

[Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis in adults and children. A narrative review]. / Tratamiento de la tuberculosis drogorresistente en adultos y niños. Revisión narrativa.

Since 2018, important changes in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis have been produced in the light of new evidence. The discovery of new anti-tuberculosis drugs, such as bedaquiline and nitroimidazopirane derivatives, as well as the use of repurposed drugs, led to international organizations to recommend new, totally oral, treatment regimens for mono-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, leaving aside the prolonged use of injectables, with their inherent toxicity and discomfort. Some definitions of drug-resistant tuberculosis have changed. The duration of treatment is also under review, leading some new regimens under study, such as BPaL (bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid), to a duration similar to that for treating susceptible tuberculosis. In this narrative review, we describe the new definitions, some basic diagnostic aspects, the pharmacological aspects, and the new classification of drugs to be used in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis as well as the currently proposed schemes to treat it available within the Argentinean context. Finally, we include a brief review of ongoing clinical trials on new shortened treatments.

Desde 2018 han surgido a la luz de la evidencia importantes cambios en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis drogorresistente. El descubrimiento de nuevas drogas antituberculosis, como la bedaquilina y los derivados de nitroimidazopiranos, así como la utilización de drogas repropuestas, llevó a la recomendación de organismos internacionales de nuevos esquemas de tratamiento de la tuberculosis monorresistente y multidrogorresistente que son totalmente orales y así dejan de lado el uso prolongado de inyectables, con su inherente toxicidad e incomodidad. Algunas de las definiciones de tuberculosis drogorresistente han cambiado. También está en revisión el tiempo de su tratamiento y con algunos nuevos esquemas en estudio, como el BpaL (bedaquilina, pretomanid y linezolid), se ha logrado una duración similar a la del tratamiento de la tuberculosis pansensible. En esta revisión bibliográfica narrativa describimos las nuevas definiciones, algunos aspectos diagnósticos básicos, los aspectos farmacológicos y la nueva clasificación de las drogas a utilizar en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis drogorresistente, así como los esquemas actualmente propuestos para tratarla, contextualizados con la realidad nacional. Finalizamos con una breve reseña de los estudios clínicos en curso de nuevos esquemas acortados de tratamiento.

Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: After the wide use of linezolid (LZD), numerous reports of uncontrolled studies have suggested that LZD is associated with high rates of thrombocytopenia. We conducted this matched case-control study to identify the risk factors for LZD-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during the period of myelosuppression. METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved laboratory and clinical data from the medical records of 180 Chinese with AML. Among them, 60 received ≥ 72 h of therapy with LZD during myelosuppression. The remaining patients who did not receive LZD therapy were matched individually in a ratio of 1:2 according to the basic characteristics of the LZD group. RESULTS: We found that in the LZD group, age, history of liver or kidney disease, the baseline level of bilirubin, and creatinine clearance rate (CCR) did not affect the recovery time of platelets. Patients who received LZD for more than 7 days during the period of myelosuppression had a significantly longer time of platelet recovery and platelet count increase. CONCLUSION: The use of LZD > 7 days during the course of myelosuppression and the low level of albumin can prolong the time required for platelet count increase and recovery. Further study is needed to assess the potential adverse effects of LZD in larger AML patient populations.

Bedaquilina para pacientes com tuberculose resistentes à rifampicina, multirresistentes e extensivamente resistentes a medicamentos / Bedaquiline for tuberculosis-resistant patients rifampicin, multi-resistant and extensively resistant to medicines

INTRODUÇÃO: A tuberculose (TB), conhecida anteriormente como tísica, é uma doença que pode ser causada por sete espécies do gênero do complexo Mycobacterium sendo a mais importante, do ponto de vista de saúde pública, a M. tuberculosis. Globalmente cerca de 10 milhões de pessoas tiveram TB no ano de 2018. No Brasil, em 2018, foram diagnosticados 72.788 casos novos de TB o que representa uma incidência de 34,8 casos por 100 mil habitantes. A TB pode ser classificada como pulmonar e extrapulmonar, sendo a primeira forma mais prevalente. Além disso, a TB pode ser classificada conforme a resistência à medicamentos, tais como: RR-TB, MDR-TB e XDR-TB. PERGUNTA DE PESQUISA: A bedaquilina (BDQ) associada ao tratamento padrão para pacientes adultos com RR-TB, MDR-TB ou XDR-TB, é mais eficaz, efetiva e segura comparado ao tratamento padrão utilizado pelo SUS (levofloxacino, moxifloxacino, amicacina, capreomicina, etionamida, terizidona, linezolida, clofazimina, pirazinamida, etambutol, isoniazida, rifampicina e paraminossalicílico) ou placebo? TECNOLOGIA: Bedaquilina (Sirturo®). EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: A revisão sistematizada recuperou nove estudos (uma revisão sistemática [RS] com meta-análise em rede [network meta-analysis - NMA], um ensaio clínico randomizado [ECR] com dois relatos e sete estudos de coorte [seis retrospectivas e uma prospectiva]). A RS, com NMA, avaliou a BDQ em comparação aos medicamentos delamanida, metronidazol, moxifloxacino e levofloxacino. A RS avaliou os desfechos conversão de cultura do escarro e aceitabilidade, e não foram verificados resultados estatisticamente significantes. Os estudos de coorte avaliaram a BDQ em comparação aos mais diversos tratamentos disponíveis para RR-TB, MDR-TB e XDR-TB. As coortes avaliaram os seguintes desfechos: sobrevida sucesso no tratamento, tratamento completo, cura, conversão da cultura do escarro e mortalidade. Os resultados não foram estatisticamente significantes na meta-análise de modelo de efeitos randomizados para todos os desfechos avaliados, porém os resultados dos efeitos fixos demostraram resultados estatisticamente significantes favorecendo o tratamento com BDQ em comparação ao tratamento sem BDQ. Vale salientar que foram realizadas análises de subgrupos com o ECR, TMC207, que avaliou eficácia e segurança da BDQ associado ao tratamento padrão em comparação ao grupo placebo associado ao tratamento padrão em até 120 semanas para os desfechos de conversão da cultura do escarro, cura e segurança (mortalidade), porém não mudaram a direção dos resultados nas duas modelagem da meta-análise. AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA (AE): Os tratamentos com BDQ comparado aos tratamentos do SUS mostraram-se dominados na avaliação de custo-efetividade, para o desfecho paciente curado. Assim, os tratamentos do SUS para RR-TB, MDR-TB e XDR-TB dominaram todos os tratamentos com BDQ, ou seja, todos os tratamentos com BDQ foram menos efetivos e mais caros que os tratamentos do SUS para obter a cura dos indivíduos com RR-TB, MDR-TB e XDR-TB. AVALIAÇÃO DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO (AIO): A AIO, para os pacientes com RR-TB, variou entre um custo incremental R$ 936 mil no caso base a uma economia de -R$ 1 milhão ao final do quinto ano no cenário alternativo; para MDR-TB variou entre uma economia de -R$44 mil no caso base a um gasto de R$ 110 mil ao final do quinto ano no cenário alternativo; e para XDR-TB variou entre um custo incremental de R$ 188 mil no caso base a R$ 4 mil no cenário alternativo ao final do quinto ano. MONITORAMENTO DO HORIZONTE TECNOLÓGICO (MHT): Cinco medicamentos foram detectados no MHT para pacientes com MDR-TB e XDR-TB (canamicina, cicloserina, sutezolida, pretomanide e protionamida). CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS: Há resultados conflitantes nas evidências encontradas no relatório. O ECR, analisado como de alto risco de viés (Risk of Bias 2.0) mostrou que a BDQ associada ao tratamento padrão é eficaz em comparação ao grupo de tratamento placebo associado ao tratamento padrão, porém com maior número de mortes e episódios de náusea em comparação ao grupo de tratamento sem a BDQ. Os resultados da RS, com NMA, de qualidade moderada, não demonstraram diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre as tecnologias avaliadas. Os resultados das meta-análises dos estudos de coorte de baixa qualidade metodológica (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), em combinação com o ECR da BDQ, foram demonstrados em efeitos fixos e randomizados. Os desfechos sucesso no tratamento, tratamento completo, cura, conversão da cultura do escarro e mortalidade não foram estatisticamente significantes no modelo de efeito randomizados na meta-análise. No entanto, foram estatisticamente significantes no modelo de efeito fixos da metaanálise, e favoreceram o tratamento com BDQ em comparação aos pacientes não tratados sem BDQ. A AE demonstrou que os tratamentos com BDQ foram dominados em relação aos tratamentos disponibilizados no SUS sem BDQ, para o desfecho paciente tratado, sendo, portanto, mais custosos e menos efetivos. A AIO, para pacientes com RR-TB, variou entre R$ 936 mil no caso base a uma economia de -R$ 1 milhão no cenário alternativo ao final do quinto ano, para MDRTB variou entre uma economia de -R$44 mil no caso base a um custo de R$ 110 mil ao final do quinto ano no cenário alternativo e para XDR-TB variou entre um custo adicional de R$ 188 mil no caso base a um custo adicional de R$ 4 mil ao final do quinto ano no cenário alternativo. RECOMENDAÇÃO PRELIMINAR DA CONITEC: A Conitec, em sua 87ª reunião ordinária, realizada nos dias 03 e 04 de junho de 2020, deliberou que a matéria fosse disponibilizada em consulta pública com recomendação preliminar favorável à incorporação no SUS da bedaquilina para pacientes com tuberculose resistente à rifampicina (RR-TB), a tuberculose multirresistente (MDR-TB) e para tuberculose extensivamente resistente a medicamentos (XDR-TB), condicionada ao monitoramento e apresentação dos dados de vida real, efetividade e segurança, da utilização da bedaquilina pela população brasileira e conforme critérios estabelecidos em protocolo do Ministério da Saúde. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: A Consulta Pública nº 24/2020 foi realizada entre os dias 22/06/2020 a 13/07/2020. Foram recebidas 66 contribuições no total, das quais 19 (29%) foram pelo formulário para contribuições técnico-científicas e 47 (71%) pelo formulário para contribuições sobre experiência ou opinião de pacientes, familiares, amigos ou cuidadores de pacientes, profissionais de saúde ou pessoas interessadas no tema. Das 19 contribuições de cunho técnico-científico, 95% submeteram a contribuição com opinião concordando totalmente com a recomendação preliminar da comissão. Apenas uma contribuição discordou da recomendação preliminar da Conitec, mas foi uma contribuição equivocada e se tratava de outro tema de consulta pública, portanto, foi excluída da análise. Das 47 contribuições recebidas sobre experiência ou opinião, apenas 15 foram analisadas, pois 32 estavam em branco, se tratavam de outro tema ou foram preenchidas inadequadamente. As 15 contribuições remanescentes concordaram 100% com a decisão preliminar da comissão. Após a apreciação das contribuições encaminhadas na consulta pública nº 24/2020, o plenário da Conitec considerou que: I) Foi apresentado um novo preço de USD 340 da bedaquilina pela Johnson & Johnson, sendo proposto um desconto de 15% no preço utilizado no relatório de recomendação preliminar (USD 400); II) Foram enviadas novas estimativas de incidência para pacientes com tuberculose multirresistente, bem como evidência de possíveis limitações na análise de impacto orçamentário; III) A nova análise de impacto orçamentário, utilizando os novos parâmetros enviados na consulta pública, aponta para economia de recursos na população com tuberculose multirresistente e um custo incremental com tuberculose resistente à rifampicina e tuberculose extensivamente resistente no cenário sem taxa de difusão gradual da bedaquilina (100% no primeiro ano de incorporação). No entanto, ao adotarmos o cenário com taxa difusão gradual da bedaquilina, 30% no primeiro ano de incorporação a 70% no quinto ano, os resultados mudam e proporcionam economia de recursos para pacientes com tuberculose resistente à rifampicina e um custo incremental para pacientes com tuberculose multirresistente e tuberculose extensivamente resistente. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL DA CONITEC: Os membros da Conitec presentes na 89ª reunião ordinária, no dia 05 de agosto de 2020, deliberaram por unanimidade recomendar a incorporação da bedaquilina para pacientes com tuberculose resistentes à rifampicina, multirresistentes e extensivamente resistente a medicamentos, condicionado a apresentação de dados de vida real e conforme preconizado pelo Ministério da Saúde. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 538/2020. DECISÃO: Incorporar a bedaquilina para pacientes com tuberculose resistentes à rifampicina, multirresistentes e extensivamente resistente a medicamentos, condicionado a apresentação de dados de vida real e conforme preconizado pelo Ministério da Saúde, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, conforme Portaria nº 36, publicada no Diário Oficial da União nº 168, seção 1, página 77, em 01 de setembro de 2020.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 17 de julho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on July 17, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 14 artigos e 13 protocolos.

Shortened tuberculosis treatment regimens: what is new?

Given the global burden of tuberculosis, shortened treatment regimens with existing or repurposed drugs are needed to contribute to tuberculosis control. The long duration of treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) is associated with nonadherence and loss to follow up, and the treatment success rate of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is low (approximately 50%) with longer regimens. In this review article, we report recent advances and ongoing clinical trials aimed at shortening regimens for DS-TB and MDR-TB. We discuss the role of high-dose rifampin, as well as that of clofazimine and linezolid in regimens for DS-TB. There are at least 5 ongoing clinical trials and 17 observational studies and clinical trials evaluating shorter regimens for DS-TB and MDR-TB, respectively. We also report the results of observational studies and clinical trials evaluating a standardized nine-month moxifloxacin-based regimen for MDR-TB. Further studies, especially randomized clinical trials, are needed to evaluate regimens including newer drugs, drugs proven to be or highly likely to be efficacious, and all-oral drugs in an effort to eliminate the need for injectable drugs.

A critical review of HPLC-based analytical methods for quantification of Linezolid.

Linezolid is a synthetic antimicrobial agent belonging to the oxazolidinone class. Since its approval in the year 2000 until now, linezolid remains the main representative drug for the oxazolidinone class of drugs, which is used in therapy due to its unique mode of action, which involves inhibition of protein synthesis. As linezolid holds great importance in antimicrobial therapy, it is necessary to compile the various analytical methods that have been reported in the literature for its analysis. Analytical techniques used for pharmaceutical analyses and therapeutic drug monitoring play an important role in comprehending the aspects regarding bioavailability, bioequivalence, and therapeutic monitoring during patient follow-ups. Even though linezolid has had the approval for clinical use for more than 18 years now, most of the analytical methods for its determination reported in the scientific literature are the ones which utilize HPLC. Therefore, the present review provides a summary of the HPLC-based methods used in the determination and quantification of linezolid in different matrices since the time of its discovery.

Shortened tuberculosis treatment regimens: what is new? / Esquemas mais curtos de tratamento da tuberculose: o que há de novo?

ABSTRACT Given the global burden of tuberculosis, shortened treatment regimens with existing or repurposed drugs are needed to contribute to tuberculosis control. The long duration of treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) is associated with nonadherence and loss to follow up, and the treatment success rate of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is low (approximately 50%) with longer regimens. In this review article, we report recent advances and ongoing clinical trials aimed at shortening regimens for DS-TB and MDR-TB. We discuss the role of high-dose rifampin, as well as that of clofazimine and linezolid in regimens for DS-TB. There are at least 5 ongoing clinical trials and 17 observational studies and clinical trials evaluating shorter regimens for DS-TB and MDR-TB, respectively. We also report the results of observational studies and clinical trials evaluating a standardized nine-month moxifloxacin-based regimen for MDR-TB. Further studies, especially randomized clinical trials, are needed to evaluate regimens including newer drugs, drugs proven to be or highly likely to be efficacious, and all-oral drugs in an effort to eliminate the need for injectable drugs.

RESUMO Em virtude da carga global da tuberculose, esquemas mais curtos de tratamento com medicamentos já existentes ou reaproveitados são necessários para contribuir para o controle da doença. A longa duração do tratamento da tuberculose sensível (TBS) está relacionada com não adesão e perda de seguimento, e a taxa de sucesso do tratamento da tuberculose multirresistente (TBMR) é baixa (de aproximadamente 50%) com esquemas mais longos. Neste artigo de revisão, relatamos avanços recentes e ensaios clínicos em andamento cujo objetivo é encurtar os esquemas de tratamento de TBS e TBMR. Discutimos o papel da rifampicina em altas doses, assim como o da clofazimina e linezolida em esquemas de tratamento de TBS. Relatamos também os resultados de estudos observacionais e ensaios clínicos de avaliação de um esquema padronizado de nove meses à base de moxifloxacina para o tratamento de TBMR. Mais estudos, especialmente ensaios clínicos randomizados, são necessários para avaliar esquemas que incluam medicamentos mais novos, medicamentos comprovadamente ou provavelmente eficazes e medicamentos exclusivamente orais na tentativa de dispensar o uso de medicamentos injetáveis.

Blefarite: epidemiologia, etiologia, apresentações clínicas, tratamento e evolução de nossos pacientes / Blepharitis: epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentations, treatment and evolution of our patients

Resumo Objetivo: A blefarite é uma das condições mais comumente encontradas na prática oftalmológica e se constitui em uma causa frequente de irritação e desconforto ocular. Por ser uma doença de difícil tratamento, os autores buscaram compreender melhor a epidemiologia, etiologia, apresentações clínicas, tratamento e evolução de seus pacientes, visando maior sucesso terapêutico. Métodos: Foram avaliados retrospectivamente e transversalmente o prontuário de 124 pacientes do Centro de Oftalmologia Tadeu Cvintal, os quais apresentavam blefarite e foram submetidos à classificação de gravidade e coleta de secreções palpebrais para cultura bacteriana e antibiograma. Resultados: A media da idade dos pacientes foi de 67,4 anos, o sexo feminino foi responsável por 70 (56,4%) casos e o masculino por 54 (43,5%). Quanto à gravidade da doença, constatou-se 71 casos de blefarite leve (56,8%), 52 (41,6%) com intensidade moderada e 2 (1,6%) casos graves. Avaliando o seguimento do tratamento da doença, foi observado que 103 (82,4%) pacientes não retornaram para avaliar o resultado do tratamento e apenas 22 (17,6%) retornaram. Em relação às culturas realizadas, 82 (66,1%) não apresentaram crescimento microbiano. Dentre as 42 (33,8%) amostras positivas, os Staphylococcus coagulase negativo foram os mais prevalentes, sobretudo os Staphylococcus epidermidis, responsável por 35 (83,3%) delas. Quanto à sensibilidade aos antibióticos, os agentes de nossa amostra demonstraram maior resistência à Penicilina, Eritromicina e Ciprofloxacino e 100% de sensibilidade à Linezolida, Vancomicina e Daptomicina. Conclusão: Conhecendo melhor as características epidemiológicas da blefarite e a sensibilidade antimicrobiana das bactérias envolvidas, é possível oferecer tratamentos mais eficazes.

Abstract Objective: Blepharitis is one of the most commonly encountered conditions in ophthalmic practice and is a frequent cause of eye irritation and discomfort. Being a difficult to treat disease, the authors sought to better understand the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentations, treatment and evolution of their patients, aiming at greater therapeutic success. Methods: The medical records of 124 patients of Centro de Oftalmologia Tadeu Cvintal who had blepharitis were retrospectively and cross-sectionally evaluated and underwent severity classification and collection of eyelid secretions for bacterial culture and antibiogram. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.4 years, females accounted for 70 (56.4%) cases and males for 54 (43.5%). Regarding the severity of the disease, there were 71 cases of mild blepharitis (56.8%), 52 (41.6%) with moderate intensity and 2 (1.6%) severe cases. Evaluating the follow-up of treatment of the disease, it was observed that 103 (82.4%) patients did not return to evaluate the treatment outcome and only 22 (17.6%) returned. In respect of the cultures performed, 82 (66.1%) did not show microbial growth. Among the 42 (33.8%) positive samples, coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most prevalent, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis, responsible for 35 (83.3%) of them. As for antibiotic sensitivity, the agents in our sample showed greater resistance to Penicillin, Erythromycin and Ciprofloxacin and 100% sensitivity to Linezolid, Vancomycin and Daptomycin. Conclusion: By better understanding the epidemiological characteristics of blepharitis and the antimicrobial sensitivity of the bacteria involved, it is possible to offer more effective treatments.

Characterization of Vancomycin Reactions and Linezolid Utilization in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Red man syndrome (RMS) occurs because of non-IgE-mediated histamine release. Unlike vancomycin allergy, which necessitates the use of an alternative drug (often linezolid), RMS does not typically preclude further vancomycin use. Care should be taken to differentiate these reaction types from one another to prevent unnecessary vancomycin avoidance. OBJECTIVE: To characterize vancomycin reaction types in our population, and to determine whether having a reaction consistent with RMS is associated with otherwise unexplained vancomycin avoidance and linezolid use. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts for children with documented vancomycin reactions. We classified the in-hospital reactions via an objective analysis and estimated the prevalence of different reaction types. We then identified children who received linezolid over 3 years, and investigated reasons for linezolid use instead of vancomycin. RESULTS: Of the 78 in-hospital reactions we characterized, 72 (92%) were objectively consistent with RMS, 5 we could not objectively classify (2 most likely RMS, 3 more suspicious for possible IgE-mediated allergy), and 1 was a non-RMS/non-IgE reaction. Of 60 children who received linezolid, 19 had previous reactions consistent with RMS, which should not preclude further vancomycin. Nevertheless, only 7 of 19 (37%) had a clear explanation for receiving linezolid instead of vancomycin compared with 32 of 39 (82%) children without previous vancomycin reactions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients had vancomycin reactions consistent with RMS. These patients are at risk for unnecessary vancomycin avoidance and linezolid utilization. We propose that this may be related to how reactions appear in the electronic medical record.

Avances en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis multirresistente / Advances in the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Resumen El tratamiento de las tuberculosis multidrogorresistentes (TBC-MDR) se basa en esquemas de fármacos con diseños muy variables, en pacientes con patrones de resistencia heterogéneos y seguimientos no estandarizados, lo que hace dificil plantear recomendaciones con fuerte nivel de evidencia. Además, sólo una minoría de estos enfermos recibe tratamiento a nivel mundial y con los actuales esquemas menos del 50% de los que logran ser tratados curan. Afortunadamente, durante los últimos años han aparecido nuevos medicamentos, (bedaquilina, delamanid y pretomanid), que están demostrando ser de real utilidad para estos pacientes en ensayos con mejor diseño y seguimiento, donde se puede establecer con mayor precisión la eficacia, toxicidad y grado de recaídas. Además, algunos fármacos ya conocidos, (fluoroquinolonas, linezolid, clofazimina) están siendo introducidos dentro de los nuevos esquemas de tratamiento.

Abstract Therapy of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) is based on trials with drugs with highly variable patterns of resistance and non-standardized follow-ups that make it difficult to provide recommendations with strong levels of evidence. Also, the vast majority of MDR-TB patients fail to receive therapy and those who receive it, only achieve around 50% of good results. Fortunately new drugs have emerged (bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid) that are being useful for these patients with better designed trials and monitoring, in which the efficacy, toxicity and degree of relapses can be evaluated more accurately. Some drugs already known (fluorquinolones, linezolid and clofazimine) are also being introduced in new schemes of therapy.