RESUMEN
The addition of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) to immunotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has shown promising results. We report the real-world data from the ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) on the impact of conventional (CRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on the outcome of aUC patients receiving pembrolizumab after platinum-based-chemotherapy. Medical records of 837 patients were reviewed from 60 institutions in 20 countries. Two hundred and sixty-two patients (31%) received radiotherapy (cohort A), of whom 193 (23%) received CRT and 69 (8%) received SBRT. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with OS and PFS. With a median follow-up of 22.7 months, the median OS was 10.2 months, 6.8 months and 16.0 months in no RT, CRT and SBRT subgroups (p = 0.005), with an 1y-OS rates of 47%, 34% and 61%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 1y-OS rate in the SBRT subgroup were significantly higher for both lower (63%) and upper tract UC (68%), for pure urothelial histology (63%) and variant histologies (58%), and for patients with bone (40%) and lymph-node metastases (61%). Median PFS was 4.8 months, 9.6 months and 5.8 months in the CRT, SBRT and no RT subgroups, respectively (p = 0.060). The 1y-PFS rate was significantly higher (48%) in the SBRT population and was confirmed in all patient subsets. The difference in terms of ORR was in favour of SBRT. Our real-world analysis showed that the use of SBRT/pembrolizumab combination may play a role in a subset of aUC patients to increase disease control and possibly overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care (SoC) for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The benefit of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to platinum-based chemotherapy was recently investigated. We performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials comparing ICI-based treatments. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases. The results were filtered by including only reports on clinical trials or randomized clinical trials from 2018 to 2023, including 3047 patients from four clinical trials (EV302, CHECKMATE-901, IMVIGOR130, KEYNOTE-361). An IPD meta-analysis was performed by reconstructing IPD from Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of Pembrolizumab + EV compared to experimental arms of the other trials of immunotherapy + chemotherapy. RESULTS: The OS analysis showed an advantage of IPD from EV302 vs. all the other trials. For EV302 vs. KEYNOTE-361, the HR was 0.51; for EV302 vs. IMVIGOR130, the HR was 0.47; and for EV302 vs. CHECKMATE-901, the HR was 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51-0.85). In the PFS analysis, the EV302 arm showed a statistically significant advantage compared to CHECKMATE-901 (HR 0.66) and versus IMVIGOR130 (HR 0.51). LIMITATIONS: By using reconstructed IPD curves, it was not possible to adjust patient-level covariates, and the heterogeneity of the included population may have affected the pooled results. CONCLUSIONS: The EV302 experimental arm showed better OS and PFS when compared to the other immunochemotherapy combinations. An immunochemotherapy combination strategy at the beginning of treatment in mUC seems to be superior in terms of OS and PFS compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone. EV-Pembrolizumab resulted to have better outcomes compared to avelumab, rather than other immunochemotherapy combinations. However, given the heterogeneity of these studies, a longer follow up and prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Inmunoterapia , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials (CTs) are critical in understanding and managing cancer. However, despite being completed, CT results are often unpublished, compromising the ability to glean useful information from them. This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing the non-publication of urological oncology clinical trials. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify CTs focused on urological cancers completed between 2000 and 2020. We used the National Clinical Trial (NCT) identifier number to check whether the trial was published. RESULTS: 9,145 oncology CTs were conducted between 2000 and 2020, of which 8.39% (n = 767) focused on urological cancers, and 47.2% (n = 362) of these trials remained unpublished. Univariable analysis revealed that trials with a sample size of less than 50 and phase 4 were significantly associated with non-publication p < 0.001. In contrast, trials involving triple masking, a higher number of agents, and those conducted in High-Income Countries were associated with a higher likelihood of publication p < 0.05. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that trials enrolling more than 50 patients and employing three or more agents, along with triple and quadruple masking, had higher odds of being published (OR = 1.62; 95%CI (1.22-2.16), 1.89; 95%CI (1.10-3.27), 3.04; 95%CI (1.44-6.44), 5.62; 95%CI (1.72-18.37), and 5.41; 95%CI (1.76-16.67), p < 0.05, respectively). However, trials conducted in low-middle-income Countries had lower odds of publication (OR = 0.26; 95%CI (0.08-0.87), p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: We found that almost one-half (47.2%) of all completed urologic oncology clinical trials are not published in a PubMed-indexed journal. This non-publication rate represents a significant loss of scientific knowledge and progress. We identified several key variables including sample size.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Edición/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review delves into the pressing issue of urologic oncology considerations within the transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) community. With estimates suggesting that TGD individuals constitute 0.3 to 0.5% of adults worldwide, and this number steadily rising, our review examines the barriers that impede the delivery of excellent quality care, particularly in the context of cancer diagnosis and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings highlight disparities in cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment access for TGD individuals. These challenges are compounded by a dearth of research and the failure of healthcare systems to account for gender identity and its nuances in data collection. Main themes in the literature include the impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy and surgery on cancer risk, challenges in prostate cancer screening and management, and considerations pertinent to testicular and other urological cancers in TGD patients. SUMMARY: The implications for clinical practice and research are profound and emphasize the need for multidisciplinary approaches that cater to the unique healthcare needs of TGD individuals. This includes comprehensive strategies for inclusive and accurate data collection, alongside the development of evidence-based guidelines for cancer screening and management tailored specifically to this population.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Personas Transgénero/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiología , Oncología Médica/normas , Oncología Médica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Growing attention has been drawn to urologic tumors due to their rising incidence and suboptimal clinical treatment outcomes. Cancer therapy resistance poses a significant challenge in clinical oncology, limiting the efficacy of conventional treatments and contributing to disease progression. Recent research has unveiled a complex interplay between the host microbiota and cancer cells, highlighting the role of the microbiota in modulating therapeutic responses. AREAS COVERED: We used the PubMed and Web of Science search engines to identify key publications in the fields of tumor progression and urologic tumor treatment, specifically focusing on the role of the microbiota. In this review, we summarize the current literature on how microbiota influence the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor immunity, as well as their impact on treatments for urinary system malignancies, highlighting promising future applications. EXPERT OPINION: We explore how the composition and function of the gut microbiota influence the tumor microenvironment and immune response, ultimately impacting treatment outcomes. Additionally, we discuss emerging strategies targeting the microbiota to enhance therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance. The application of antibiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and oncolytic bacteria has improved tumor treatment outcomes, which provides a novel insight into developing therapeutic strategies for urologic cancer.
Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microambiente Tumoral , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Animales , Neoplasias Urológicas/microbiología , Neoplasias Urológicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Microbiota/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Currently, treatment strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are changing rapidly. However, there are many limitations in the implementation of new surgical methods and systemic treatment options, which cannot reverse the current status quo of UTUC treatment. In recent years, antibody-drug conjugates have shown great potential in the field of cancer treatment, which can activate the immune system and enhance the effect of immunotherapy while accurately killing targeted tumor cells. The results of multiple clinical trials, including the EV-302 study, have confirmed that combination therapy can improve the survival rate of patients with advanced urothelial cancer, and may replace chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer. However, there are still a series of challenges in the application of combination therapy in UTUC, such as low level of evidence, adverse reactions, and drug resistance. In the future, it is necessary to focus on clinical trials of UTUC combination therapy, further optimize antibody drug conjugates and immunotherapy drugs to adapt to the disease characteristics of UTUC, and further study the molecular biology characteristics of UTUC to meet this series of challenges.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoconjugados , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/inmunología , Terapia Combinada , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Oncología Médica , Humanos , Urología , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapiaRESUMEN
The 2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium, this year celebrating the 20th anniversary, delved into key advancements in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and prostate cancer (PC). For UC, insights emerged from adjuvant pembrolizumab for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, and from the efficacy of the EV-302 study of enfortumab vedotin +pembrolizumab in the metastatic setting. In PC, adjuvant therapy with high-dose radiotherapy schedules plus long-t erm ADT was explored. In metastatic castration-resistant PC, highlights included a novel combo (cabozantinib+atezolizumab) for poor prognosis patients; confirmed benefits of ARSI+PARPi in BRCA-mutated patients; and safety considerations for ARSI treatments. The symposium continued its role as an indispensable platform for shaping specialized oncological care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologíaAsunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/psicología , Taiwán/epidemiología , Turquía/epidemiología , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: With the recent rising interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, many studies have explored the potential and usefulness of AI in urological diseases. This study aimed to comprehensively review recent applications of AI in urologic oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed-MEDLINE databases for articles in English on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models related to general surgery and prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer. The search terms were a combination of keywords, including both "urology" and "artificial intelligence" with one of the following: "machine learning," "deep learning," "neural network," "renal cell carcinoma," "kidney cancer," "urothelial carcinoma," "bladder cancer," "prostate cancer," and "robotic surgery." RESULTS: A total of 58 articles were included. The studies on prostate cancer were related to grade prediction, improved diagnosis, and predicting outcomes and recurrence. The studies on bladder cancer mainly used radiomics to identify aggressive tumors and predict treatment outcomes, recurrence, and survival rates. Most studies on the application of ML and DL in kidney cancer were focused on the differentiation of benign and malignant tumors as well as prediction of their grade and subtype. Most studies suggested that methods using AI may be better than or similar to existing traditional methods. CONCLUSIONS: AI technology is actively being investigated in the field of urological cancers as a tool for diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and decision-making and is expected to be applied in additional clinical areas soon. Despite technological, legal, and ethical concerns, AI will change the landscape of urological cancer management.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Masculino , Oncología Médica/métodos , Aprendizaje Profundo , Aprendizaje AutomáticoRESUMEN
Immunotherapy is defined as a therapeutic approach that targets or manipulates the immune system. A deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular composition of the tumour environment, as well as the mechanisms controlling the immune system, has made possible the development and clinical investigation of many innovative cancer therapies. Historically, immunotherapy has played an essential role in treating urologic malignancies, while in the modern era, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been critical to urology. Urothelial carcinoma is a common type of cancer in the genitourinary system, and treatment strategies in this area are constantly evolving. Intravesical and systemic immunotherapeutic agents have begun to be used increasingly frequently in treating urothelial carcinoma. These agents increase the anti-tumour response by affecting the body's defence mechanisms. Immunotherapeutic agents used in urothelial carcinoma include various options such as BCG, interferon, anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been known for many years as a tumour with unique sensitivity to immunotherapies. The recent emergence of ICIs that block PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab) or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) signalling pathways has reestablished systemic immunotherapy as central to the treatment of advanced RCC. In light of randomized clinical trials conducted with increasing interest in the application of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting, combination therapies (nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, pembrolizumab/ axitinib, pembrolizumab/lenvantinib) have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Prostate cancer is in the immunologically "cold" tumour category; on the contrary, in recent years, immunotherapeutic agents have come to the fore as an essential area in the treatment of this disease. Especially in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, immunotherapeutic agents constitute an alternative treatment method besides androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and Sipuleucel T (Vaccine-based) are promising alternative treatment options. Considering ongoing randomized clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents promise to transform the uro-oncology field significantly. In this review, we aimed to summarize the role of immunotherapy in urothelial, renal and prostate cancer in the light of randomized clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor engineered T (CAR T) cell therapy has developed rapidly in recent years, leading to profound developments in oncology, especially for hematologic malignancies. However, given the pressure of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, antigen escape, and diverse other factors, its application in solid tumors is less developed. Urinary system tumors are relatively common, accounting for approximately 24% of all new cancers in the United States. CAR T cells have great potential for urinary system tumors. This review summarizes the latest developments of CAR T cell therapy in urinary system tumors, including kidney cancer, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer, and also outlines the various CAR T cell generations and their pathways and targets that have been developed thus far. Finally, the current advantages, problems, and side effects of CAR T cell therapy are discussed in depth, and potential future developments are proposed in view of current shortcomings.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Animales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/metabolismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Climate change and global warming are an omnipresent topic in our daily lives. Planetary health and oncology represent two critical domains within the broader spectrum of healthcare, each addressing distinct yet interconnected aspects of human well-being. We are encouraged to do our part in saving our planet. This should include the decisions we make in our professional life, especially in uro-oncology, as the healthcare sector significantly contributes to environmental pollution. AREAS COVERED: There are many aspects that can be addressed in the healthcare sector in general, as there are structural problems in terms of energy consumption, water waste, therapeutic techniques, transportation and drug manufacturing, as well as in uro-oncology specific areas. For example, the use of different surgical techniques, forms of anesthesia and the use of disposable or reusable instruments, each has a different impact on our environment. The literature search was carried out using PubMed, a medical database. EXPERT OPINION: We are used to making decisions based on the best outcome for patients without considering the impact that each decision can have on the environment. In the present article, we outline options and choices for a more climate-friendly approach in urologic oncology.
Asunto(s)
Cambio Climático , Calentamiento Global , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Oncología Médica , Contaminación Ambiental/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Toma de Decisiones , Salud GlobalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The application of precision medicine in clinical practice implies a thorough evaluation of actionable genomic alterations to streamline therapeutic decision making. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor via next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a great opportunity but also several challenges. During the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat, we aimed to provide expert recommendations for the optimal use of NGS in urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphi method was utilized, involving a panel of 12 experts in UC from European and United States centers, including oncologists, urologists, pathologists, and translational scientists. An initial survey, conducted before the meeting, delivered 15 statements to the panel. A consensus was defined when ≥70% agreement was reached for each statement. Statements not meeting the consensus threshold were discussed during the meeting. RESULTS: Nine of the 15 statements covering patient selection, cancer characteristics, and type of NGS assay, achieved a consensus during the survey. The remaining six statements addressing the optimal timing of NGS use, the ideal source of tumor biospecimen for NGS testing, and the subsequent need to evaluate the germline nature of certain genomic findings were discussed during the meeting, leading to unanimous agreement at the end of the conference. CONCLUSION: This consensus-building effort addressed multiple unanswered questions regarding the use of NGS in UC. The opinion of experts was in favor of broader use of NGS. In a setting where recommendations/guidelines may be limited, these insights may aid clinicians to provide informed counselling and raise the bar of precision and personalized therapy.
Asunto(s)
Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Técnica Delphi , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/genética , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , ConsensoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Oligometastatic tumors illustrate a distinct state between localized and systematic disease and might harbor unique biologic features. Moreover, these tumors represent a different clinical entity, with a potential of long-term disease control or even cure, therefore they receive growing attention in the field of urologic oncology. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer, most experts limit it to a maximum of three to five lesions and involvement of no more than two organs, excluding visceral metastases. Quality data on oligometastatic bladder cancer is scarce, however, a consensus of experts defined it as a maximum of three metastatic lesions, either resectable or suitable for stereotactic therapy, without restrictions to the number of organs involved. As for kidney cancer, a maximum number of five metastases, without limitations to the location are defined as oligometastatic, with an important implication of timing of developing metastases since diagnosis of the primary tumor. SUMMARY: Defining oligometastatic state among urological tumors reflecting their distinct biological and clinical behavior is crucial to establish a sound framework for future clinical trials, and to facilitate guideline and policy formulation for improved patient care. Advancements in molecular imaging are expected to transform the field of oligometastatic urologic tumors in the future.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Aim: This study assessed real-world treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany. Materials & methods: Patients diagnosed with mUC from 2015 to 2019 were identified in two claims databases: AOK PLUS and GWQ. Results: 3226 patients with mUC were analyzed; 1286 (39.9%) received systemic treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (platinum-based chemotherapy: 64.2%). Factors associated with receiving treatment were: younger age, male sex, less comorbidity and recent diagnosis. In AOK PLUS and GWQ populations, unadjusted median overall survival (interquartile range) from diagnosis in treated patients was 13.7 (6.8-32.9) and 13.8 (7.1-41.7) months, and in untreated patients was 3.0 (1.2-10.8) and 3.6 (1.2-18.8) months, respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with mUC in Germany receive no systemic treatment.
What is this article about? This article reports the results from a study in Germany between 2015 and 2019 that investigated how advanced bladder cancer that has spread to other organs was treated and how long people lived after diagnosis. The study looked at systemic therapies, which means treatments that affect the entire body.What were the results? Only 40% of people diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer received systemic treatment within the first 12 months. Of those who did receive systemic treatment, the majority received combination therapy that included a chemotherapy drug containing platinum (64%). Systemic treatment was more likely to be given to people who were younger, less sick, male, or more recently diagnosed. After 12 months, 56% of treated people were still alive, compared with 26% of people without treatment. On average, people who received systemic treatment lived for about 14 months, while people without systemic treatment lived for only 3 to 4 months.What do the results of the study mean? Many people with advanced bladder cancer in Germany do not receive systemic treatment. People who receive treatment are likely to live longer than those who do not receive treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alemania/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
Metastasis is a major contributor to treatment failure and death in urological cancers, representing an important biomedical challenge at present. Metastases form as a result of cancer cells leaving the primary site, entering the vasculature and lymphatic vessels, and colonizing clones elsewhere in the body. However, the specific regulatory mechanisms of action underlying the metastatic process of urological cancers remain incompletely elucidated. With the deepening of research, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been found to not only play a significant role in tumor progression and prognosis but also show aberrant expression in various tumor metastases, consequently impacting tumor metastasis through multiple pathways. Therefore, circRNAs are emerging as potential tumor markers and treatment targets. This review summarizes the research progress on elucidating how circRNAs regulate the urological cancer invasion-metastasis cascade response and related processes, as well as their role in immune microenvironment remodeling and circRNA vaccines. This body of work highlights circRNA regulation as an emerging therapeutic target for urological cancers, which should motivate further specific research in this regard.